The Different Charter - Acts
The Different Charter - Acts
The Different Charter - Acts
Members of the Board had access to and were to be furnished with all
the papers of the company.
A secret committee of 3 directors was to transmit the orders of the
Board to India.
This act gave the British Govt a measure of control over the Company’s
affairs. The formation of the BOC and inclusion of the two British
cabinet members in it reduced the power of the Directors and the
Proprietors and instead increased the rights of the British Govt in the
Administation of India.
•However, the act had a provision, that the Crown could order the
application of the whole of the revenue for the purpose of defense if the
circumstances posed such demands.
•The act reorganised the courts and redefined their jurisdictions. The
revenue administration was divorced from the judiciary functions and this
led to the disappearing of the MAAl ADALATS.
Charter Act of 1813
Charter Act of 1813 renewed the East India Company's charter thereby
terminating its monopoly in India, except in regards to tea and trade with
China. This opened India both to private investment and Christian
missionaries.
Church was placed under a Bishop which was maintained from Indian
revenue. Englishmen were granted permission to settle and hold land in India;
to the missionaries for introducing useful knowledge and propagating
religious and moral improvement and to traders for their lawful purposes,
under a system of licenses.
The Act for the first time defined the constitutional position of British
territories in India .
Presidencies lost the powers to legislate and laws made by the legislature which were to
be called Acts of the Government of India.
It enhanced the effectiveness of the BOC over the directors of the company
The Crown was empowered to appoint commissioners for Indian affairs in addition to
members of the BOC
Charter Act 1833 contd.
The Supreme Court also came under the GG due to his legislative powers.
The Acts of the central legislature were now binding on all persons, Indian or
European living in the company’s territories as also on the courts.
Charter act of 1833 distinctly spelled out the powers of the Governor-General-
in-Council. He could repeal, amend or alter any laws or regulations including
all persons (whether British or native or foreigners), all places and things in
every part of British territory in India, for all servants of the company, and
articles of war.
1833 contd…
The Charter Act of 1833 provided for splitting the Presidency of Bengal, into
two presidencies which were to be known as- Presidency of Fort William
and Presidency of Agra. But this provision never came into effect.
However, the Court of Directors acting under the Board of control could veto a
ny laws made by the Governor-General-in-Council.
Codifying the Laws: The Charter Act of 1833 is considered to be an attempt to
codify all the Indian Laws. The British parliament as a supreme body, retained
the right to legislate for the British territories in India and repeal the acts.
The act of 1833 provided that all laws made in India were to be laid before the
parliament and were to be known as Acts.
In a step towards codifying the laws, the Governor-General-in-Council was dire
cted under the Charter act of 1833, to set up an Indian law Commission.
1833 contd…
First Indian Law Commission
So the first law commission was set up by the Charter act of 1833 and Lord
Macaulay was its most important member and Chairman.
The other members of this commission were English barrister Cameron,
Macleod of Madras service, William Anderson of Bombay Service and Sir
William McNaughton of the Calcutta Service. Sir William McNaughton did
not accept the appointment.
The objective of the law commission was to inquire into the Jurisdiction, powers
and rules of the courts of justice, police establishments, existing forms of
judicial procedure, nature and operation of all kinds of laws. It was directed
that the law Commission shall submit its report to the Governor
General-in-council and this report was to be placed in the British parliament.
1833 contd…
Indians in the Government service:
Charter act of 1833 was the first act which provisioned to freely admit the natives of India
to share an administration in the country. It attempted to introduce a system of open
competitions for the selection of civil servants. However this provision was negated
after opposition from the Court of Directors who were still holding the privilege of
appointing the company officials.
The Act for the first time introduced local representation in the Indian (Central)
Legislative Council. The Governor-General's Council had six new legislative members
who were appointed by the local (provincial) governments of Madras, Bombay, Bengal
and Agra.
The Act separated, for the first time, the legislative and executive functions of the
Governor-General's Council.
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
ACT 1858
Government of India Act 1858
The Act laid down that "Indian shall be governed by and in the name of the
sovereign through one of the principal Secretaries of State (Secretary of State
of India), assisted by a Council of 15 members." The Secretary of State
received the powers so long enjoyed by the Court of Directors and the Board
of Control.
Thus, the system of 'Double Government' introduced by Pitt's India of 1784
was finally abolished . Of the 15 members of the Council of the Secretary of
State, 8 were to be appointed by the Crown and 7 by the Court of Directors.
The Act provided that at least half of these members must have served in
India for not less than ten years and they must not have been away from that
country for more than ten years at the time of their appointment.
1858 contd..
The vacancy among the Crown nominees would be filled up by the Crown,
while among those elected by the Directors would be filled up by the Council
by election. The members would continue in office during good behavior and
would be removed only on petition, to the Crown by both the Houses of
Parliament. The Council was to be advisory, in most cases the initiative and
the final decision remained with the Secretary of State.
The Governor-General received the title of Viceroy. He became the direct
representative of the Crown. The Act divided the patronage between the
Crown, the Secretary of State in Council and the authorities in India.
Appointments to the Civil Service were to be made by open competition
under the rules laid down by the Secretary of State with the help of Civil
Service Commissioners. The Act declared the Secretary of State for India as
a corporate body who could sue and be sued in England and in India.