3431 PDF
3431 PDF
INTRODUCTION
The main energy source used by humans is fossil fuels which were formed thousands of years ago and are
non-renewable energy. The need for fossil energy increases along with the increasing human population
and also the development of technology. In other words, if it is used continuously with an increasing
amount, it is possible that there will be a scarcity of energy sources that can even be depleted. 1 An alternative
to reducing the use of fossil fuels is urgently needed. One of them is making charcoal briquettes from
biomass. Biomass has the potential to be processed into alternative energy sources with relatively large
energy content, such as rambutan peel waste and durian skin waste. 2,3 Other solid organic waste (biomass)
which is very abundant and underutilized, one of which is banana peel waste, especially the kepok banana
(Musa paradisiaca F.). Kepok banana is a type of banana that is more delicious to eat after processing. In
the processing in Palu City, many Kepok bananas are used as snacks such as fried bananas, chips and banana
sticks. Banana peels can be used as compost, bioethanol raw material, animal feed, and charcoal briquettes.
However, in Palu City, the banana peel produced from this processing is underutilized, so it only becomes
waste.
The criteria that must be owned by a plant to become an energy fuel are cellulose and lignin content. 4 The
main ingredient that must be contained in the charcoal briquette raw material is lignocellulose.
Lignocellulose consists of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. The lignocellulose content in banana peels
belonging to biomass includes 38.1% hemicellulose, 58.5% lignin and 41.8% cellulose.5 The adhesive
material used is sago flour. The content of sago flour as an adhesive material includes 27% amylose and
73% amylopectin. Amylose is hard, while amylopectin is sticky, so it is good to use for bonding. 5 The
advantage of charcoal briquettes is that the materials used are easy to obtain because of the abundant and
little to develop biomass waste. By making charcoal briquettes, it is hoped that it will be able to reduce
waste to become an environmentally friendly alternative fuel. The method of making briquettes is also
relatively easy and economical and uses simple tools. Based on the above background, research using
Rasayan J. Chem., 15(1), 108-115(2022)
http://dx.doi.org/10.31788/RJC.2022.1516607 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 license.
Vol. 15 | No. 1 |108-115| January - March | 2022
Kepok banana peel waste to be used as a charcoal briquette material using sago flour as an adhesive aim to
identify the characteristics of charcoal briquettes from Kepok banana peels based on the Indonesian
National Standard.
EXPERIMENTAL
Tools and Materials
The tools used in this study were large paint cans, digital balance, mortar and pestle, oven, desiccator, watch
glass, 70 mesh sieve, briquette printer, measuring cup, beaker, spatula, container (basin), calorimeter bomb,
calorimeter, spoon, gegep, stopwatch, and Universal Testing Machine (UTM). The materials used in this
research were banana peel waste, sago flour and sufficient water.
Making Charcoal
Charcoal used is charcoal from the banana peel of Kepok. Kepok banana peels are cleaned first and then
dried in the sun for 4 days to dry. The place to make charcoal is to use a large tin with a hole in the lid about
15 cm. Banana peel that is dry is put a little into the tin to start the fire. After burning well, another banana
peel is put to the full and closed. The banana peel is allowed to burn until it becomes charcoal, which is
indicated by no more smoke coming out. The charcoal obtained is weighed, then mashed and sieved using
a 70 mesh sieve. The charcoal that has been sieved is weighed as much as 100 g of the adhesive variation
used.
Table-1: Comparison of the Mass of the Adhesive with the Volume of Water Used
No. Adhesives Concentration (%) Adhesive Material Mass (g) Water Volume (mL)
1 5 3.75 75
2 10 7.50 75
3 15 11.25 75
The method of testing the moisture content is that the cup to be used is put in an oven at a temperature of
105°C until the weight of the plate is constant ± 30 minutes and cooled in a desiccator then weighed as the
weight of an empty cup. The charcoal briquette sample was put in as much as 2 g into a cup then oven for
30 minutes at a temperature of 105°C. After that, it is cooled in a desiccator and then weighed. Repeat steps
until sample weight are constant.
Table-2: Data Analysis of the Characteristics of Kepok Banana Peel Charcoal Briquettes
Concentration of Adhesive (%) 5 10 15
Mass of adhesive/100 g of charcoal 3.750 7.50 11.25
Density (g / cm3) 0.596 0.569 0, 594
Compressive Firmness (kg/cm2) 4,892 4,616 6,862
Moisture Content (%) 8,465 8,350 9,170
Ash Content (%) 27,850 25,588 24,888
Volatile Substances (%) 46,967 51,283 52,588
Bonded Carbon Content (%) 16,718 14,780 13,535
Calorific Value (cal/g) 10,815,944 10,795,181 10,063,326
Density of Charcoal Briquettes
Density is the result of the ratio between mass and volume. The density value affects the burning rate and
calorific value of the briquettes. The higher the density, the higher the firing rate, and the better the quality
of the briquette. From Table-2 it can be seen that the charcoal briquettes that have the highest density are
charcoal briquettes with an adhesive concentration of 5%, which is 0.5957 g/cm 3, while charcoal briquettes
with an adhesive concentration of 10% have a density of 0.5689 g/cm3 and adhesive concentration 15% had
a density of 0.5941 g/cm3.
The amount of pressure applied when printing briquettes and the particle size of raw materials and adhesives
can affect density. In addition, it affects the efficiency of burning charcoal briquettes as fuel.2,8 Therefore,
before mixing it with the charcoal adhesive, it is sieved first using a 70 mesh sieve so that the particle size
is the same and the resulting mixture is homogeneous. Charcoal briquettes density obtained ranged from
111
CHARACTERISTICS OF CHARCOAL BRIQUETTES Supriadi et al.
Vol. 15 | No. 1 |108-115| January - March | 2022
0.5689 to 0.5957 g/cm3 has met the national standards of Indonesia. Similar density values have been
reported for rambutan peel biomass briquettes.2 The minimum density of charcoal briquettes is 0.4407
g/cm3 (SNI, Table-3).
optimal because it is carried out using conventional methods as previously discussed in the volatile matter
content test.10 The bonded carbon content obtained did not meet the standards (SNI 06-3730-1995) at all
adhesive concentrations. The bound carbon content according to the standard is 80% (SNI, Table-3).
Calorific Value of Charcoal Briquettes
The calorific value is the main test parameter in making charcoal briquettes. The calorific value can
determine the quality of charcoal briquettes. The higher the calorific value obtained, the better the quality
of the charcoal briquettes produced. The factors that influence the high and low calorific value of the
briquettes are moisture content, ash content, fly substance content and bound carbon content. In addition,
raw materials and adhesive materials also affect the calorific value of charcoal briquettes. 10 Table-2 shows
the highest calorific value obtained by charcoal briquettes with a concentration of 15% of 13,063.3264
cal/g, then the adhesive concentration of 5% is 10,815.9437 cal/g and the adhesive concentration of 10% is
10,795,1807 cal/g. The results obtained are not in accordance with research8, which used the raw material
of nipah fruit peel with sago starch adhesive, where the calorific value decreases along with the increasing
concentration of adhesive on charcoal briquettes. Paisal's study6 also found that the calorific value of sago
stem bark charcoal briquettes decreased with the increasing concentration of sago starch adhesive. The
difference in the results obtained is presumably because the raw materials used are different because the
raw materials have their respective characteristics.
The calorific value generated in this study ranged from 10,795,1807-13,063,3264 cal/g fulfilling the
standard (SNI01-6235-2000) with a minimum calorific value of 5000 cal/g (SNI, Table-3).
Table-3: Comparison of Test Results with Standardization of Charcoal Briquettes from Japan, England, America,
Indonesia
Characteristics of Charcoal
Japan America England SNI
Briquettes
Density (g/cm3) 1.0–2.0 0.84 1 0.4407
Compressive strength (kg/cm2) 60 12.7 62 3
Moisture content (%) 6–8 3–4 6 8
Ash content (%) 3–6 8–10 18 8
Volatile substance content (%) 15-30 16 19 15
Bound carbon content (%) 60-80 75 58 80
Calorific value (cal/g) 6000 – 7000 6500 7000 ≥5000
CONCLUSION
Charcoal briquettes produced in this study meet several characteristics in accordance with SNI. From the
test results, the best adhesive concentration is 5%. The characteristics of charcoal briquettes produced by
charcoal briquettes with a concentration of 5% that meet the SNI are a density of 0.5957 g/cm 3, a
compressive strength of 4.8920 kg/cm2, and a calorific value of 10,815.9437 cal/g. While the characteristics
that did not meet the SNI were water content of 8.465%, ash content of 27.850%, volatile matter content of
46.967% and bound carbon content of 25.183%.
REFERENCES
1. G. O. Donuata, F. K. Serangmo, and I. Gauru, Jurnal Teknik Mesin, 2(2), 47(2019),
https://doi.org/10.32511/jtm.v2i2.336
2. S. Rahmawati, Prosiding Simposium Nasional Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Sains 2013 (SNIPS 2013),
pp.251-255 (2013).
3. M. Faisal, A. R. Yelvia Sunarti and H. Desvita, Rasayan Journal of Chemistry, 11(2), 871(2018),
https://doi.org/10.7324/RJC.2018.1123035
4. D. Y. Sukowati, Pendipa Journal of Science Education, 3(3), 142(2019),
https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.3.3.142-145
5. A. O. Ifelebuegu, A. Johnson, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 47(11),
964(2017), https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2017.1318620
6. A. A. Safana, N. Abdullah, and F. Sulaiman. Journal of Oil Palm Research, 30(1), 130(2018),
https://doi.org/10.21894/jopr.2018.0007
114
CHARACTERISTICS OF CHARCOAL BRIQUETTES Supriadi et al.
Vol. 15 | No. 1 |108-115| January - March | 2022
7. S. Rahmawati, Pathuddin, J. Sakung, Suherman, A. Fudholi, and L. Sushmita, The 1st International
Conference on Lesson Study of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (ICOLSSTEM
2019), IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1563(012022), 1742(2020),
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1563/1/012022
8. S. Frodeson, G. Henriksson, and J. Berghel, Elsevier: Biomass and Bioenergy,122, 322(2019),
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.01.048
9. I. Qistina, D. Sukandar and T. Trilaksono, Jurnal Kimia Valensi, 2(2), 136(2016),
https://doi.org/10.15408/jkv.v2i2.4054
10.H. Anizar, E. Sribudiani and S. Somadona, Perennial, 16(1), 11(2020)
11.N. Kongprasert, P. Wangphanich and A. Jutilarptavorn Procedia Manufacturing, 30, 128(2019),
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.019
12.S. R. Sjarif, Journal of Industrial Technology Research, 9(2), 97(2017)
13.M. Faisal, A. Gani, F. Mulana, H. Desvita and S. Kamaruzzaman, Rasayan Journal of Chemistry,
13(1), 514(2020), https://doi.org/10.31788/RJC.2020.1315507
[RJC-6607/2021]
115
CHARACTERISTICS OF CHARCOAL BRIQUETTES Supriadi et al.