Section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act deals with desertion as grounds for divorce. Desertion requires two elements from the deserting spouse: the fact of separation and the intention to desert. Desertion only occurs when both of these elements are present. Prior to 1976, desertion was only grounds for judicial separation, but it was amended to also allow for divorce. Desertion can be actual physical desertion from the marital home or constructive desertion through words or conduct that make living together impossible.
Section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act deals with desertion as grounds for divorce. Desertion requires two elements from the deserting spouse: the fact of separation and the intention to desert. Desertion only occurs when both of these elements are present. Prior to 1976, desertion was only grounds for judicial separation, but it was amended to also allow for divorce. Desertion can be actual physical desertion from the marital home or constructive desertion through words or conduct that make living together impossible.
Section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act deals with desertion as grounds for divorce. Desertion requires two elements from the deserting spouse: the fact of separation and the intention to desert. Desertion only occurs when both of these elements are present. Prior to 1976, desertion was only grounds for judicial separation, but it was amended to also allow for divorce. Desertion can be actual physical desertion from the marital home or constructive desertion through words or conduct that make living together impossible.
Section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act deals with desertion as grounds for divorce. Desertion requires two elements from the deserting spouse: the fact of separation and the intention to desert. Desertion only occurs when both of these elements are present. Prior to 1976, desertion was only grounds for judicial separation, but it was amended to also allow for divorce. Desertion can be actual physical desertion from the marital home or constructive desertion through words or conduct that make living together impossible.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3
Section 13(1) (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 deals with desertion as a
ground for divorce . Desertion means the desertion of the petitioner by the other
party to the marriage without reasonable cause and without the consent of or against the wish of such party and includes the wilful neglect of the petitioner by the other party to the marriage. . There are mainly four basic elements which are primarily to be satisfied to constitute desertion The first two are to be present in the deserting spouse. 1. The fact of separation (factum deserdendi) 2. The intention to desert (animus deserdendi) Desertion is a state which occurs only on the co-existence of both of these elements. If either of these two ingredients is absent, the petition for divorce on desertion fails. The interesting phenomenon in desertion is that either of the elements can precede the other; however, desertion will result only when both coincide and form a union. The word desert literally means ‘to abandon or give up or forsake without any sufficient reason or intention to return’
Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has introduced a revolutionary
amendment to the shastric Hindu law. It provides for the dissolution of marriage. Under Hindu law, divorce does not take place unless it has been granted by a court. Before passing of the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976, the grounds for judicial separation and divorce were different. The Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976 makes the grounds of divorce and judicial separation common. An aggrieved party may sue for divorce or judicial separation. Under Shastric Hindu law, wedlock was unbreakable, and the marital bond existed even after the death of a party to a marriage. Divorce was known only as a matter of exception in certain tribes and communities which were regarded uncivilized by the Hindu elite. The courts recognized it in these communities due to the binding force of custom. But the general Hindu law did not recognize it. The provisions regarding divorce have been twice amended since the passing of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: 1. By the Hindu Marriage (Amendment) Act, 1964, and 2. By the Marriage Laws4 (Amendment) Act, 1976. The original provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act regarding divorce have been liberalized by the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976. It also added a new ground namely divorce by mutual consent of the parties has been made available as a matrimonial relief under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Desertion was a ground only for judicial separation under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. However, after passing of the Act of 1976, this is a ground for both divorces as well as judicial separation under Section 13 (1) (i-b). Desertion may be actual or constructive. Constructive desertion may contain the characteristics of cruelty. In actual desertion, there is forsaking of the matrimonial home while in constructive desertion, there is forsaking of the matrimonial relationship. This forsaking of the matrimonial relationship must be accompanied by the animus deserendi. It is the neglecting spouse that is solely responsible for constructive desertion. If by words or conduct, a spouse makes it impossible for the other spouse to live in his or her company and as a result, the other spouse leaves the matrimonial home, the other spouse cannot be said to be the deserter. Desertion is a continuing offence. It is possible to bring the state of desertion to an end by some act or conduct on the part of deserting spouse. It may come to an end in the following ways: Resumption of cohabitation, resumption of marital intercourse and supervening animus revertendi, or offer of reconciliation. In Gagandeep Gupta v. Dr. Sonika Gupta5 , the husband filed a petition for divorce on the ground of desertion by the wife. There was no cohabitation between the parties since they separated. The wife continued to remain in matrimonial home by asserting her right of residence in spite of matrimonial discord. Wife had deserted husband without any reasonable cause for more than two years preceding presentation of the petition. The court held that the husband would be entitled to a decree of divorce. Talking about the loopholes in the laws of desertion in India, Recognizing the loophole in the law of desertion, the Courts sought to restrict such abuse of this provision by laying down stipulations such as casual acts of intercourse are not to be considered as proof of resumption of the marital relationship. Additionally, the offer of reconciliation must be genuine and in good faith. There may be instances where the deserting spouse has given just cause for leaving the matrimonial home. In these instances, the deserted spouse cannot possibly be expected to subject herself to a risk of recurrence and should be allowed to refuse reconciliation. At the end, it can be suggested that Due to the subjectivity and absence of any guidelines for the determination of desertion petitions, the discretion and prejudices play a huge role in the process. It is true that every case needs to be weighed according to the individual facts and background, however for consistency in dispensing justice; there is a need to introduce guidelines for the judges. The deserted spouse is left with no option but to wait for the deserting spouse and in cases wherein the deserted spouse is aware that the deserting spouse has deserted him or her, he or she still do not possess the qualification to knock the door of the Court for being granted a divorce, since that 2-year condition sword is hanging which needs to be necessarily fulfilled.
Financial and Managerial Accounting 12th Edition by Carl S. Warren Carl S. Warren & James M. Reeve & Jonathan E. Duchac all chapter instant download