PIL Case Digest - Territory - Law of The Sea

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

JD 3 0 6: P UB LI C INT E R NA TIO NA L LA W

S a tur da y 6: 0 0 PM t o 9: 0 0 P M
1 s t S e me s te r S Y 2 0 2 2 - 2 0 2 3

C ove r ag e :
V II . T E RR IT O RY : LA W OF T H E S EA

© 2020, TOMAS CLAUDIO COLLEGES, COLLEGE OF LAW; TAGHANGIN MORONG, RIZAL


TA BL E O F CONT EN TS
C OR F U CH AN N E L C AS E ................................ ................................................................ . 1

MA RI TI ME DE LI MI T A TI O N AN D TE R RI T OR IA L QU E S TI ON S BE T WE E N QA T AR AN D B AH RA IN .. 2

N OR T H S E A CON T IN E N T AL S HE LF C AS E S ( GE RM AN Y/ DE N M A RK AN D
GE RM AN Y/N E T HE R LAN D S ) ............................................................................................ 3

© 2020, TOMAS CLAUDIO COLLEGES, COLLEGE OF LAW; TAGHANGIN MORONG, RIZAL


JD 3 0 6: P UB LI C INT E R NA TIO NA L LA W
- 1 -
COR F U CH AN N E L C A SE
[I C J RE PO RTS , 1 9 4 9 ]

F AC TS:
On O c to be r 2 2 , 1 9 4 6 , tw o Br it ish c ru ise rs a nd tw o de s tr oye rs, c o mi ng f ro m the
sou th , e n te re d t he N or th C or fu S tr a it . T he c ha nne l t he y w e re fo llo w i ng , w hic h w as i n
A lb ani a n w a te rs , w as re g ar de d as s af e : i t h ad b e e n sw e p t i n 1 9 4 4 an d c he c k -s w e p t i n
1 9 4 5. One of t he de s t roye rs , t he S au m are z , w he n of f S ar an da , s t ruc k a m ine a nd w as
g rave ly d a m ag e d . Th e ot he r de s tr oye r , th e V ol ag e , w as se n t to h e r ass is ta nc e a nd , w h ile
to w ing he r , s tr uc k an ot he r m ine an d w as a lso se ri ous ly d a m ag e d. F or ty -fi ve Br i tish
of fic e rs a nd s a il ors l o s t the ir l iv e s , a nd f or t y -tw o ot he rs w e re w o unde d.
The Un i te d Ki ng d om s e ize d t he Co ur t of th e disp u te by a n A pp li c at i on file d on 2 2
Ma y 1 9 4 7 a nd ac c us e d A lb an i a o f h avi ng l a id o r a ll ow e d a t hir d S t ate t o l ay the m ine s
af te r m ine -c le ari ng o pe r at io ns h a d be e n c arr ie d ou t by the A ll i e d n ava l a u th or it ie s . The
c ase h ad pre v io us l y b e e n br o ug h t be f ore t he Uni te d N at io ns an d, in c onse que nc e of a
re c o m me n da t io n b y t he S e c u ri ty C ou nc il , h ad b e e n r e fe rre d t o t he C o ur t.
A lb ani a , f o r i ts p ar t , ha d s u bm i tte d a c o un te r -c la i m ag ai ns t the Un i te d Ki ng d om . It
ac c use d the l a t te r of hav ing v io la te d A l ba n ia n sov e re ig n ty b y se ndi ng w ars hips in t o
A lb ani a n te rr it or ia l w at e rs an d o f c a rry ing ou t mi ne sw e e ping o p e ra ti on s in A lb an i an
w a te rs af te r t he e x p l os i ons .
The C our t did n ot ac c e pt th e f irs t o f the se c o mpl ai n ts b ut f ou nd th a t t he Un i te d
King do m ha d e x e rc is e d t he r ig h t o f i nn oc e nt pass ag e th r oug h in te r na t io na l s tr ai ts. O n
the o the r h an d, i t f ou nd th a t t he mi ne sw e e ping ha d vi ol a te d A lb an ia n so ve re ig n ty ,
be c a use i t h a d be e n c arr ie d ou t ag ain st t he w ill o f t he A l ba ni a n G ove r n me n t. In
par t ic u la r, it di d n o t ac c e p t the no t io n o f “ se lf - he l p” asse rte d by the U ni te d Ki ng d o m to
jus ti fy i ts in te rv e n ti o n.

I SSUE :
Whe the r A l ba ni a s h o uld be he ld r e sp ons ib le f or the e x pl osi o ns th a t c a use d
da m ag e t o the Br it is h w ars hi ps u nde r in te r na ti on a l l aw

H E L D:
[Y E S ] The H ag ue C onv e nt io n of 1 9 0 7 , N o. V TI I, is a pp lic ab le i n t i me of w ar t hus the
obl ig at io n of A lb an ia is t o be ba se d i n ac c o rd o f c e r t ai n g e ne ra l an d w e l l -re c og n ize d
pri nc ip le s i n i n te r na ti on al , n a me ly: e le me n ta ry c ons ide ra ti o ns o f h um a ni ty , e ve n m or e
e x ac ting in pe ac e t ha n in w a r; the pr inc i pl e of t he f re e d o m o f m ari ti me c o m mu nic a t io n;
an d e ve r y S t a te 's o bl i g at i on n o t to al lo w k n ow i ng ly i ts t e rr it or y t o be use d fo r ac ts
c on tr ar y t o the rig hts of o the r S t a te s . A lb a ni a , ha ving t he e x c l us ive c o nt r ol w i t hi n i ts
fr on tie rs c o ns ti tu t ing jur is d ic t io n , h ad th e re sp ons ibi li ty t o i nf or m or to w ar n the Bri t i sh
ve sse ls an d s hi pp ing in g e n e r al of th e e x is te nc e o f m ine s in t he C or fu Ch a nne l . T he m ine -
lay ing in th e C or fu C h an ne l c ou ld no t h ave be e n e ffe c te d w i th o u t t he k now le dg e or
c onse n t o f A l ba ni a – ac t s o f w h ic h t ha t are c on tr ar y t o the rig ht s of t he o t he r S ta te s .
The re f ore , A l ba ni a s h ou ld be he l d re s po nsi ble f or t he e x p los i on c aus ing the
da m ag e t o the Br it is h c ruis e rs and de s tr oy e rs .

© 2020, TOMAS CLAUDIO COLLEGES, COLLEGE OF LAW; TAGHANGIN MORONG, RIZAL


JD 3 0 6: P UB LI C INT E R NA TIO NA L LA W
- 2 -
M ARI TI ME DE LI MI T A TI ON AN D TE RRI T ORI AL QUE S TI ON S
BE T WE E N QA T AR AN D B AH RAI N
[I C J RE PO RTS , 1 6 MA R C H 2 0 0 1]

F AC TS:
A dis p u te c o nc e r ni ng s ov e re ig n ty ove r c e r t ai n is l a nds an d sh o al s, i nc l udi ng the
de li m it a ti on o f a m ar i ti me bo un da ry w e r e i ssue s u po n w hic h Qa t ar an d B ahr a in s oug h t
to re s olve fo r 2 0 ye ar s . D u ring t his pe ri od of ti me , le t te rs w e re e x c ha ng e d an d
ac k n ow le dg e d by bo t h p ar tie s ’ he ads o f s t at e .
A Tri pa rt i te Co m mi t te e “f or the pu rp ose of app r oac hi ng t he I n te r na ti on a l C o ur t o f
Jus tic e … ” w a s f or me d by re pre s e nt a tive s o f Qa ta r, Ba hr ai n and S au di A r ab i a. Th oug h t he
c o mm i tte e me t s e v e r al ti me s , i t fa ile d t o p rod uc e an ag re e me n t on the spe c i fic te rm s fo r
sub mi t ti ng t he d is p ut e t o t he Co ur t. Eve n t ua lly , the me e t ing s c ul mi na te d in “ Min u te s”,
w hic h re af fi rm e d the proc e s s a nd s t ipu la te d t ha t the pa r tie s “ m ay ” sub m i t t he d isp ut e t o
the I CJ a fte r g iv ing th e S au di King six mo n t hs t o re so lve the d isp ute .
A fte r a le ng t hy j ur is d i c ti on al ph ase , the c o ur t iss ue d its me ri ts j udg me n t , a w a rd ing
sove re ig n ty ov e r t he H aw a r Is la nds t o B ah rai n , a nd ove r Z ub ar a h a nd Ja na n Isl an d,
inc l ud ing H add J an an , to Q a t ar . T he c o ur t’s sove re ig n ty de te r mi na ti on s f ac to re d
c ons ide ra bly in t o t he loc a ti on of t he m a ri ti me b ou nd ar y .

I SSUE :
Whe the r a n i n te rn a ti on al ag re e me n t c re a t ing r ig h ts an d o blig a t io ns c a n be
c ons ti t ut e d b y t he s ig na t orie s t o the m inu t e s of me e t ing s an d le t te rs e x c ha ng e d .

H E L D:
[Y E S ] In in te r n at io n al law , i n te r na ti o na l ag re e me n ts d o n o t tak e a si ng le fo r m u nde r t he
Vie nn a C onv e n ti on on the L aw o f T re at ie s , an d t he Co ur t has e nf orc e d t his rul e in t he
pas t. The C ou r t s a id , the re is no do ub t th a t l ang uag e pl ays a v it al r o le in in fl ue nc ing a
c ou rt ’s de c is i on as t o w he t he r a n ag r e e me nt has be e n e n te re d i nt o and in t his p a rt ic ul ar
c ase , t he l a ng u ag e w as the m ai n f oc us o f t he I C J a nd it w as th e c on te n ts o f t he M in u t e s
th a t pe rsu ade d t he IC J t o re je c t t he B ah r ai n f ore ig n mi nis te r ’s c l ai m th a t he did n ot
in te n d t o e nte r i nt o a n ag r e e m e n t. Whe re t his is c o mp ar e d to g e ne r al U .S . c on tr ac t l a w ,
w he re a c l ai m by one of th e p ar tie s t ha t n o c on tr ac t e x is te d be c ause t he re w as n o
me e ti ng o f the mi nds mig ht be the g ro un d up on w hic h a U .S . c o ur t w o ul d c o ns i de r
w he t he r a c on tr ac t d i d e x is t w i t h m o re c a r e an d t h oug ht th a n t he I C J g ave t he f ore ig n
mi nis te r o f B ah ra in ’s c la ims .
In th is c a s e , t he M in u te s n o t o nl y c o n ta in t he re c ord o f t he me e t ing s be tw e e n the
par t ie s , i t a ls o c o nt a i ne d the re a f fir m a ti on of ob lig a ti ons pre v io usly ag re e d to an
ag re e me nt t o a ll ow t he Ki ng of S au di A ra b ia t o t ry to fi nd a s ol u ti on t o t he d isp u te
dur ing a six - m on t h p e ri od , a nd in dic ate d t he p ossi bil i ty of th e i nvo lve me n t of th e I C J The
Min u te s s ti pul a te d c o m mi t me n ts t o w h ic h t he p ar tie s ag re e d , t h e re by c re a t ing r ig h ts an d
obl ig at io ns i n i n te rn a ti on al l aw . Thi s is the bas is t he re f ore , of th e e x ist e nc e of
in te r na ti o na l ag re e m e nt .

© 2020, TOMAS CLAUDIO COLLEGES, COLLEGE OF LAW; TAGHANGIN MORONG, RIZAL


JD 3 0 6: P UB LI C INT E R NA TIO NA L LA W
- 3 -
N OR TH SE A C ON TI N E N T AL SH E LF C ASE S
(GE R MAN Y / DE N MA R K A N D GE R MAN Y /N E TH E RL AN D S)
[I C J RE PO RTS , 2 0 FE B R UA RY 1 9 6 9]

F AC TS:

Pro ce ed ing s jo i ned w it h No rth Sea C o nt in en t al Sh el f ( Fed er al Re pu bli c o f


Ge r man y / Net he rla nds ) o n 26 Apr il 1968 .
The c as e i nv olv e d t he de li m it a ti on o f t he c on ti ne n t al s he l f are a s in the N or t h S e a
be tw e e n Ge rm a ny an d D e n m ark an d Ge r m any a nd Ne t he rl a nds be yo nd t he p ar ti al
bo und ar ie s p re v i o us l y ag re e d u po n b y t he se S t at e s , t ha t the bo und ar ie s be tw e e n the ir
re spe c tive are as of t h e c on ti ne n t al s he l f i n the N o rt h S e a a nd th e are a c l ai me d by t he
Fe de r al Re pu blic o f G e rm an y , s h ou ld b e de te r mi ne d by the a ppl i c at i on of th e pr inc ipl e of
e qui dis t anc e as s e t f or th in A rt ic le 6 of t h e Ge ne v a C o nve n ti o n of 1 9 5 8 on t he
C on ti ne n t al S he l f , w h ic h b y J an u ary 1 , 1 9 6 9 h a d be e n r at if ie d o r ac c e de d to by 3 9 s t at e s
bu t t o w hic h Ge r m an y w as no t a p ar ty , w a s the ba sis of D e n ma r k ’s a nd th e Ne the r l an d’s
c on te n t io n.
Be c a us e the us e o f th e de li m it a ti on me t ho d w as no t me r e ly a c o nve n ti on a l
obl ig at io n , b ut a r ule th a t w as p ar t o f the c orp us of g e ne r al in te rn at io n al l aw an d l ik e
ot he r ru le s o f g e ne r al or c u s t o m ary in te r na ti on al l aw , w hic h w as bin di ng a u to m at ic all y
on Ge rm a ny , i nde p e n de n t o f any spe c i fic a sse n t, dir e c t or in dire c t , g ive n by Ge r ma ny ,
D e n ma rk a nd th e N e t he rl a nd’ s c o nte nde d t ha t Ge r m an y w as b ou nd to ac c e p t th e
de li m it a ti on on a n e q uid is ta nc e b asis .

I SSUE :
Whe the r de li mi t a ti on be t he o bje c t of a n e qui t ab le ag re e me n t b e tw e e n t he s ta te s
inv olve d

H E L D:
[Y E S ] D e li m it a ti on m u s t be t he o bje c t of an e qui t ab le ag re e me n t be tw e e n the s t a te s
inv olve d. A s s t ipu l ate d in A rt ic le 6 o f t he G e ne va C on ve n ti on , e q uid is ta nc e p rinc ip le i s
no t p ar t of c us to m ar y in te r na ti o na l l aw . A r tic le 6 m ak e s t he o bl i g at i on to use the
e qui dis t anc e me th o d a s e c ond ar y o ne w hic h c o me s in to pl ay on l y w he n ag re e me n ts
be tw e e n the pa r tie s a re a bs e n t. A l th oug h t he pr inc ipl e o f e q ui di st anc e is n ot g ive n a
fu nd am e n t al n or m -c r e a ting c h ar ac te r b y A rt ic le 6 , w h ic h is ne c e ssar y t o the f or ma t io n o f
a g e ne ra l r ule of la w .
The v i e w t h at c us to m ary ru le s o f i n te r na ti on al law de te r mi ne d the bo un da rie s o f
are as l oc at e d on the c on ti ne n t al s he l f be t w e e n the ir c ou nt rie s an d t he Fe de r al Re pu blic
of Ge r ma ny w a s c on t e nde d by D e n ma rk a n d t he Ne the rl an ds. In th is c as e , a fte r tak in g
in to c on side r at io n all re le v an t c i rc u ms t anc e s, the de l im i ta ti o n h e re is to be e x c u se d by
e qui t ab le ag re e me n t .

© 2020, TOMAS CLAUDIO COLLEGES, COLLEGE OF LAW; TAGHANGIN MORONG, RIZAL

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy