Twin Block 01-02-23
Twin Block 01-02-23
Twin Block 01-02-23
Introduction
Twin Blocks are constructed to a protrusive bite that effectively modifies the
occlusal inclined plane by means of acrylic inclined planes on occlusal bite
blocks.
Twin block
Philosophy
The basic philosophy behind the twin block therapy was if the mandibular
inclined planes are in a distal relation to that of maxilla then the force acting
on the mandibular teeth will have a distal force vector leading to a class II
growth tendency. The aim of the twin block is to modify these inclined
planes and cause more favourable growth pattern. Secondly, since it could
be worn 24 hours, the masticatory forces can be transmitted via the
appliance to the dentition and then to the bony trabeculae thereby
influencing the rate of growth and the trabecular structure of the supporting
bone.
History
Orthodontic force
Fixed appliances are designed to apply light orthodontic forces that move
individual teeth. Schwarz (1932) defined the optimum orthodontic force as
28 g/cm2 of root surface.
By applying light forces with archwires and elastic traction, fixed appliances
do not specifically stimulate mandibular growth during treatment. A bracket
or “small handle” is attached to individual teeth. Pressure is then applied to
those teeth by ligating light wires to the brackets.
The resulting forces applied through the teeth to the supporting alveolar
bone must remain within the level of physiological tolerance of the
periodontal membrane to avoid damage to the individual teeth and/or their
sockets of alveolar bone.
Orthopedic force
Orthopedic force levels are not confined by the level of tolerance in the
periodontal membrane but rather by the much broader tolerance of the
orofacial musculature.
The forces of occlusion applied to opposing teeth in mastication are in the
range of 400–500 g and these forces are transmitted through the teeth to the
supporting bone. Occlusal forces form a major proprioceptive stimulus to
growth whereby the internal and external structure of supporting bone is
remodeled to meet the needs of occlusal function. This is effected by
reorganization of the alveolar trabecular system and by periosteal and
endochondral apposition.
The investigations of Graf (1961, 1975) and Witt & Komposch (1971) have
shown that for 1 mm of anterior displacement the forces of the stretched
retractor muscles amount to approximately 100 g. A construction bite of 5–
10 mm will therefore transmit considerable forces to the dentition through
the functional receptors.
Orthopedic forces would exceed the level of tolerance of the periodontal
tissues if applied to individual teeth. However, these forces are spread
evenly in the dental arches by appliances that are not designed to move
individual teeth, but to displace the entire mandible and promote adaptation
within the muscles of mastication.
The muscles are the prime movers in growth, and bony remodeling is related
to the functional requirements of muscle activity. The goal of functional
appliances is to elicit a proprioceptive response in the stretch receptors of the
orofacial muscles and ligaments and as a secondary response to influence the
pattern of bone growth correspondingly to support a new functional
environment for the developing dentition.
Orthopedic traction
Before Twin Blocks were developed, the author used extraoral traction with
removable appliances as a means of anchorage to retract upper buccal segments to
correct Class II malocclusion In the early years using Twin Blocks, tubes were
added to clasp for extraoral traction on the upper appliance to be worn at night so
as to reinforce the functional component for correction of a Class II buccal
segment relationship.
A vertical orthopedic force to the upper appliance applies an intrusive force to the
upper posterior teeth and palate, and limits downward maxillary growth. Intrusion
of the upper posterior teeth allows the bite to close by a favorable forward rotation
of the mandible, and facilitates correction of mandibular retrusion in vertical
growth discrepancies. The addition of traction is optional in reduced overbite
cases, and many cases respond well to treatment without traction. Traction is
indicated in severe discrepancies with vertical growth which are unfavorable for
functional correction. A vertical component of traction force is particularly
effective in controlling this type of malocclusion.
The Concorde facebow is adjusted so that it lies just below the level of the upper
lip at rest, with the ends of the outer bow sloping slightly upward above the level
of the inner bow. The resulting extraoral traction applies an upward component of
force that helps to retain the upper appliance.
Clinical examination
Photographic Records
Orthodontic Records
Examination of models
Bite registration for Twin Blocks originally aimed for a single activation to
an edge-to-edge incisor relationship with 2 mm interincisal clearance for an
overjet of up to 10 mm. Allowance was made for individual variation if the
patient had difficulty in maintaining an edge-to-edge position on registering
the occlusion. This proved to be successful in correcting the overjet and
reducing the distal occlusion in the majority of cases.
The George Bite Gauge has a millimeter gauge to measure the protrusive
path of the mandible
Lateral views to show method of bite registration
Labial Bow
Labial bow
In the early stages of development, the upper Twin Block incorporated a
labial bow.
It was observed that if the labial bow engaged the upper incisors during
functional correction it tended to overcorrect incisor angulation.
Retracting upper incisors prematurely limits the scope for functional
correction which led to the conclusion that a labial bow is not always
required.
If a labial bow is included in the appliance design, and it is activated
prematurely to retract upper incisors, this will act as a brake to limit the
functional correction by mandibular advancement.
The appliance prescription includes all the details required for correction of
the individual malocclusion, with specific instructions on appliance design,
including springs and screws to correct individual teeth, or segmental
correction by transverse and/or sagittal correction, to improve archform.
Delta Clasp
The delta clasp was designed by the author to improve the fixation of
Twin Blocks.
The delta clasp is similar to the Adams clasp (Adams, 1970) in
principle, but incorporates new features to improve retention, reduce
metal fatigue and minimize the need for adjustment.
The retentive loops were originally triangular in shape (from which
the name “delta” is derived), or alternatively the loops may be circular
or ovoid, both types having similar retentive properties.
In the permanent dentition, delta clasps are placed routinely on upper
first molars and on lower first premolars.
They may also be used on deciduous molars. Additional interdental
ball-ended clasps, finger clasps or C-shaped clasps may be placed to
improve retention and provide resistance to anteroposterior tipping.
Ball-ended clasps are routinely employed mesial to lower canines and
in the upper premolar or deciduous molar region to gain interdental
retention from adjacent teeth.
Appliances may either be made with heat cure or cold cure acrylic.
Heat cure acrylic has the advantage of additional strength and
accuracy. Making the appliances in wax first allows the blocks to be
formed with greater precision.
Cold cure acrylic has the advantage of speed and convenience, but
sacrifices something in strength and accuracy. It is essential to use a
top-quality cold cure acrylic to avoid problems with breakage,
especially in the later stages of treatment, after trimming the blocks to
allow eruption in treatment of deep overbite.
The inclined planes can lose their definition as a result of wear if a
soft acrylic is used.
Base plate with pre formed heat cure blocks
1. Class II div 1 malocclusion with well aligned upper and lower arches
2. Class II div 2
3. Class I open bite
4. Class I closed bite
5. Class III
6. Having overjet of 10-12 mm with a deep bite
7. Horizontal growth pattern
8. Patient should preferably be in pubertal growth spurt
9. Have a positive VTO
10. Can also be used in TMJ therapy
11. Anterior and posterior arch length discrepancy
12.Lateral arch constriction
1. Factors that are unfavorable for correction by Twin Blocks include cases
with vertical growth and crowding that may require extractions.
2. Although the majority of Class II malocclusions are suitable for correction
by Twin Blocks, there are some exceptions.
3. Examination of the profile is the most important clinical guideline. If the
profile does not improve when the mandible is advanced, this is a clear
contraindication for functional mandibular advancement, and an alternative
approach should be considered.
4. Maxillary incisors should not be too vertical or lingually inclined (as in class
II div1).
5. Maxillary incisors must be torqued correctly.
6. No skeletal or facial asymmetry.
The Facial Wedge the Ricketts triangle defines the face in profile as a wedge-
shaped triangle attached to the undersurface of the cranial base.
• The base of the triangle extends from basion to nasion and defines the cranial
base plane.
• The facial plane extends from nasion tangent to the chin at pogonion to define
the angulation of the face in the anterior plane.
• The mandibular plane is the third leg of the triangle defining the angulation of
the lower border of the mandible.
• The triangle is bisected by the facial axis, extending from pterygoid to gnathion
to define the direction of growth of the chin.
The facial wedge defined by the Ricketts triangle is superimposed on the facial
rectangle to provide a good visual representation of the face with the component
parts orientated in a common framework.
A facial rectangle is formed to frame the face. The formation of a facial rectangle
helps to define the relative position and angulation of cranial, maxillary,
mandibular and dentoalveolar structures. The rectangular framework makes it
easier to identify areas where growth departs from normal in the facial pattern.
Perhaps the most obvious feature of the analysis is the visual simplification of the
underlying pattern that results from placing the face in a rectangle. It is easier to
recognize the pattern of the jigsaw puzzle when the pieces are fitted together in a
recognizable framework. The same principle lends itself to three-dimensional (3D)
analysis.
Skeletal Planes
Soft-Tissue Planes
Pre-treatment Post-functional
Angular Parameters Normal Value
Value Value
Mandibular-Plane
Angle (Go-Me to FH 26⁰+/-4⁰
Plane)
Cranio-mandibular
Angle (Ba-N to 53⁰+/-5⁰
mandibular plane)
Craniomaxillary Angle
(Ba-N to maxillary 27⁰+/-3⁰
plane)
Maxillary Deflection
(Maxillary plane to FH 0⁰+/-3⁰
plane)
Lower incisor to N
25⁰+/-4⁰
vertical
Pre-treatment Post-functional
Linear Parameters Normal Value
Value Value
-2mm at 8
Lower lip to E plane
(↓ 0.2mm/yr)
The primary indication for twin blocks in early mixed dentition is in Class II,
division 1 malocclusion in which prominent upper incisors rest outside the lower
lip and are not protected by the lips.
The deciduous molars and canines may not provide adequate undercuts for
fixation, but this problem is easily overcome.
In mixed dentition, the appliance design is modified by using C- shaped
clasps that may be directly bonded to deciduous teeth with composite to
temporarily fix the appliances in the mouth for 10 days to initiate full-time
appliance wear.
After a few days the clasps can be freed and the composite left in place to
improve undercuts for fixation.
In the initial stage the twin blocks may even be cemented or bonded directly
to the teeth in addition to the application of composite to secure the clasps.
The fixation enables the patient to adjust to wearing the appliance full time
during the critical first few days.
At this stage of development, the procedure of temporary fixation of twin
blocks to the teeth carries minimal risk, especially if first permanent molars
are fissure sealed.
Stages of Treatment
During the active phase of treatment, twin blocks are worn full time.
The objective is to correct arch relationships in the antero-posterior, vertical,
and transverse dimensions.
Normally, overjet and overbite are corrected within 6 months, and the lower
molars have erupted into occlusion within 9 months.
The average wear time for twin blocks is 6 to 9 months.
Appliance Fitting
The patient should now be wearing the appliances comfortably and eating
with them in position. The initial discomfort of a new appliance should
have resolved and the patient should be biting consistently in the
protrusive bite. Patient motivation is reinforced by offering
encouragement for their success on becoming accustomed to the
appliance so quickly, and reassurance on any difficulties. The patient
should now be turning the upper midline screw one quarter turn per
week. In the treatment of deep overbite the upper bite block should be
trimmed clear of the lower molars leaving a clearance of 1–2 mm to
allow these to erupt. At this stage, it is important to detect if the patient is
failing to posture forward consistently to occlude correctly on the
inclined planes.
This would indicate that the appliance has been activated beyond the level
of tolerance of the patient’s musculature. It would then be appropriate to
reduce the activation by trimming the inclined planes, to reduce the
forward mandibular displacement until the patient closes comfortably on
the appliances. The angulation of the inclined planes may be reduced to
45° if the patient is failing to posture consistently forward to occlude the
blocks correctly.
This may be an early sign that progress will be slower than normal, due to
weakness in the patient’s musculature reducing the functional response.
This response is more likely in the patient who has a vertical growth
pattern. Mandibular advancement will then be more gradual, usually
requiring incremental activation of the occlusal plane.
At the first monthly visit positive progress should already be evident with
respect to better facial balance.
Photographs demonstrate this very clearly, and may be repeated at this
stage to record progress. Progress can be confirmed also by noting the
amount of reduction in overjet, as measured intraorally with the mandible
fully retracted. To monitor progress, the overjet should be measured and
noted on the record card at each visit. This allows any lapse in progress
or cooperation to be detected readily.
There should be a steady and consistent reduction of overjet and
correction of distal occlusion. If cooperation is suspect it is advisable to
fix the appliance in place in the mouth to exert immediate control and
restore full-time appliance wear.
Within a few days of fitting of twin block appliances, the position of muscle
balance is altered so greatly that the patient experiences pain when retracting
the mandible.
This has been described as the pterygoid response or the formation of a
tension zone distal to the condyle.
On removal of the appliance, the mandible is retracted and the condyle
compresses the connective tissue and blood vessels that have proliferated in
the tension zone behind the condyle.
Elastic bands
Palatal Spinner
A palatal spinner may be added to the upper appliance to help control an anterior
tongue thrust. The spinner is an acrylic bead that is free to rotate round a trans-
palatal wire positioned in the palate. The objective is to encourage the tongue to
curl upwards and backwards instead of thrusting forwards.
Spinner on tubing
Tongue guard
It is in the form of a recurved wire extending from the premolar region towards the
midline and is recurved to its point of attachment.
Modified anterior inclined plane with palate-free area to control tongue thrust
The most crucial time to establish good cooperation with the patient is in the first
few days after fitting the Twin Blocks, when he or she is learning to adjust to the
new appliance. Twin Blocks have the unique advantage compared to other
functional appliances in that they can be fixed to the teeth. Such temporary fixation
guarantees full-time wear, 24 hours per day and excellent cooperation is
established at the start of treatment. There are two alternative methods of fixation
of Twin Blocks:
The appliances may be fixed to the teeth by spreading cement on the tooth-
bearing areas of the appliance but not on the gingival areas. The appliance is
then inserted and secured in place with cement adhering to the teeth. Zinc
phosphate or zinc oxide cement is suitable for temporary fixation.
Alternatively, a small quantity of glass ionomer cement may be used, taking
care to ensure that the appliance can be freed easily from the teeth.
Twin Blocks may also be bonded directly to the teeth by applying composite
around the clasps. This is a useful approach in mixed dentition when ball
clasps may be bonded directly to deciduous molars to improve fixation.
Patient maintenance
After 10–14 days, when the patient has adapted to the Twin Block and is
wearing it comfortably, the appliance can be removed by freeing the clasps
with a sickle scaler. Sharp edges of composite can be smoothed over,
leaving some composite attached to the teeth. The altered contour of the
deciduous teeth will improve the retention of the appliance. If cooperation is
doubtful at any stage of treatment, the operator should not hesitate to fix the
appliance in for 10 days to regain control and restore full-time wear. After
10 days full-time wear the patient is more comfortable with the appliance in
the mouth than without it.
Reactivation of Twin Blocks
As indicated previously, an overjet of up to 10 mm in a patient who is
growing well and has free protrusive movement may be corrected without
reactivation of the Twin Blocks during treatment.
If growth is less favorable, or in treatment of larger overjets, or when the
protrusive path of the mandible is restricted, it is necessary to reactivate the
inclined planes more gradually in progressive increments during treatment.
Reactivation is a simple procedure that is achieved by extending the anterior
incline of the upper Twin Block mesially to increase the forward posture.
Cold cure acrylic may be added at the chairside, inserting the appliance to
record a new protrusive bite before the acrylic is fully set. Even in cases with
an excessive overjet, a single reactivation of Twin Blocks is normally
sufficient to correct most malocclusions.
Several indications exist for the integration of twin blocks with fixed appliances. A
combined fixed and functional approach is necessary for correction of more
complex malocclusions in which skeletal and dental factors require a combination
of orthopedic and orthodontic techniques.
Depending on the timing of treatment and the features of the individual case,
alternative approaches may be considered to resolve multifactorial problems.
First, a preliminary stage of treatment with fixed appliances may be
indicated before the fitting of twin blocks if upper and lower arch form does
not match and the arches need to be leveled or aligned before functional
correction. This technique may be useful if crowding is moderate or severe
and cannot be resolved by twin blocks alone. Depending on the severity of
the problem, lingual appliances may be fitted for interceptive treatment and
arch development or full, bonded, fixed appliances may be used if required.
Second, because no anterior wires are used in twin blocks, brackets may be
fitted in the labial segments during twin block treatment, and a segmented
arch may be included. This allows the clinician to correct alignment while
reducing overjet, correcting distal occlusion, reducing overbite, and
correcting the transverse dimension. All these objectives can be achieved
simultaneously during the twin block phase of treatment.
A third possibility is that a full lower fixed appliance may be fitted during
the support phase. Alternatively, a lower lingual appliance may be fitted at
this stage to allow the premolars to erupt while retaining the correct arch
form.
Finally, twin blocks may be combined with bonded fixed appliances by two
different approaches. Simple, removable twin blocks may be constructed to
fit over a fixed appliance, and ball clasps may be used for retention. Another
option is to construct fixed twin blocks designed for full-time wear and
integration with fixed appliances. Clark has recently designed suitable
components to achieve this objective. Prototype appliances are currently
being used in clinical tests. This new approach to construction may extend
the integration of twin blocks with fixed appliances.
Treatment of Class II Div 2 Malocclusion:
Two sagittal screws are positioned in the palate to advance the upper
anterior teeth. Normally the palatal screws are angled to drive the
upper posterior segments distally and buccally along the line of the
arch.
This movement is necessary to ensure that the arch expands in the
molar region as the screws are opened. If the screws are set parallel in
the palate, the molars are driven into crossbite.
The screws should be in horizontal plane and should not have a
downward inclination anteriorly. This would make the appliance ride
down the anterior teeth, reducing its effectiveness.
The anteroposterior positioning of the screws and location of the cuts
determine whether the appliance acts mainly to move upper anterior
teeth labially or to distalise upper posterior teeth. The interdental
clasps also affect the reciprocal action of opening the palatal screws.
The position of anterior cut determines the number of anterior teeth
included in the anterior segment.
If only the central incisors are retroclined, these maybe the only teeth
moved labially, alternatively the lateral incisors also may be advanced
by placing the cut distal to the lateral incisors. The incisors are then
opposed against the posterior teeth to advance the labial segment.
The sagittal design also is useful for unilateral correction through
unequal operation of the sagittal screws according to the amount of
activation required on each side.
The lower twin block sagittal appliance applies similar principles in
the lower arch.
The sagittal screws are normally activated twice a week in growing
children: one quarter turn of each screw in the midweek and at the
weekend.
Less activation may be required for older patients whose tooth
movements are slower.
Sagittal twin blocks may be combined with brackets on the upper
anterior teeth with a sectional arch wire to correct individual tooth
alignment. This combination of fixed and functional appliance
treatment is effective in correcting arch relationships and alignment
simultaneously during the twin block phase of treatment.
Attracting magnets
The attracting magnets increase the frequency of occlusal contact on the inclined
planes. Indeed patients have observed that on waking, the blocks are in contact,
probably as a result of attracting magnets. This contact may increase the
effectiveness of appliance at night. Care must be taken to limit the attractive force
magnitude. If the force is too strong, the appliances may be displaced or become a
monobloc, thus losing the advantage of twin block flexibility.
Repelling magnets
• Comfort—patients wear Twin Blocks 24 hours per day and can eat comfortably
with the appliances in place.
• Aesthetics—Twin Blocks can be designed with no visible anterior wires without
losing efficiency in correction of arch relationships.
• Function—the occlusal inclined plane is the most natural of all the functional
mechanisms. There is less interference with normal function because the mandible
can move freely in anterior and lateral excursion without being restricted by a
bulky one-piece appliance.
Facial appearance—from the moment Twin Blocks are fitted the appearance is
noticeably improved. The absence of lip, cheek or tongue pads, as used in some
other appliances, places no restriction on normal function, and does not distort the
patient’s facial appearance during treatment. Improvements in facial balance are
seen progressively in the first 3 months of treatment.
• Safety—Twin Blocks can be worn during sports activities with the exception of
swimming and violent contact sports, when they may be removed for safety.