Activity 12 (A)
Activity 12 (A)
Noriel Rendiza
Schedule: TF 8:30-10:00
Answer:
b. The firearm issued to security personnel of private security agency/private detective
agency/company security services/government security unit shall be carried by the
security personnel only within the compound of the establishment where he is assigned
to guard, except when the security personnel is escorting big amount of money or
valuables or conduction duties outside its jurisdiction or area of operation, upon prior
coordination with the nearest PNP units/stations or when in hot pursuit of criminal
offenders.
2. What are he limitations/ prohibitions for private security agencies in the deployment of security
guards?
Answer:
Limitations and Prohibitions. 1. On Membership: (a) No agency operating in the City of Manila and
suburbs may employ more than 1,000 watchmen or security guards; (b) no agency operating in other
cities and first class municipalities may employ more than 500 watchmen or security guards; (c) no
agency operating in municipalities other than first class may employ more than 200 watchmen or
security guards.
3. On Service: No agency shall offer, render or accept its services to gambling dens or other
illegal enterprises. The extent of the security service being provided by any security agency shall
not go beyond the whole compound or property of the person or establishment requesting the
security service except when they escort big amount of cash.
Answer:
The kabit system is an arrangement whereby a person who has been granted a certificate of public
convenience allows other persons who own motor vehicles to operate them under his license,
sometimes for a fee or percentage of the earnings. Although the parties to such an agreement are not
outrightly penalized by law, the kabit system is invariably recognized as being contrary to public policy
and therefore void and inexistent under Art. 1409 of the Civil Code. Lim et al. v. CA, et al. [G.R. No.
125817, January 16, 2002]
If a registered owner is allowed to escape liability by proving who the supposed owner of the vehicle is,
it would be easy for him to transfer the subject vehicle to another who possesses no property with
which to respond financially for the damage done. Thus, for the safety of passengers and the public who
may have been wronged and deceived through the baneful kabit system, the registered owner of the
vehicle is not allowed to prove that another person has become the owner so that he may be thereby
relieved of responsibility.