Project Exhibition 2 PROJECT FORMAT
Project Exhibition 2 PROJECT FORMAT
Project Exhibition 2 PROJECT FORMAT
Expense Tracker
<Font Size 18><1.5 line spacing>
A PROJECT REPORT
Submitted by
<Font Size 14><Italic>
BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY
<Font Size 16>
in
PROGRAM OF STUDY
<Font Size 14>
A PROJECT REPORT
Submitted by
BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY
in
COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
<Font Style Times New Roman – size -16>
Certified that this project report titled “Expense Tracker” is the bonafide work of
“Devyanshu Gagneja (21BCE11512), Aayushi Jain (21BCE11523), Bhavya
Lalchandani (21BCE11108), Sourav Makur (21BCE11506), Gourav Makur
(21BCE11496)” who carried out the project work under my supervision. Certified
further that to the best of my knowledge the work reported here does not form part of
any other project / research work on the basis of which a degree or award was
conferred on an earlier occasion on this or anyother candidate.
PROJECT SUPERVISOR
Dr. G Ganesan ,<<Designation>>
School of Computer Science and Engineering
VIT BHOPAL UNIVERSITY
First and foremost I would like to thank the Lord Almighty for His presence and immense blessings
Aeronautical Science for much of his valuable support encouragement in carrying out this work.
I would like to thank my internal guide Mr./Ms._____________,for continually guiding and actively
I would like to thank all the technical and teaching staff of the School of Aeronautical Science, who
Last, but not the least, I am deeply indebted to my parents who have been the greatest support while
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
<Font Style Times New Roman 16 - bold>
LIST OF FIGURES
Abstract should represent the synopsis of the project. The content of the abstract should be in font
Times New Roman with size 14. Line spacing should be double.
<Font Style Times New Roman 16 - bold>
TABLE OF CONTENTS (SPECIMEN)
CHAPTER TITLE PAGE NO.
NO.
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Limitation/Constraints of the System
6.3 Future Enhancements
6.4 Conclusion
Appendix A
Appendix B
References
SPECIMEN
<<Font Size -16 Times New Roman Bold, Line Spacing – 1.5>>
LITERATURE REVIEW
Boix et al (1995) used vectorial model to assess the influence of local breeze and other
meteorological parameters on the ground level concentrations of SO2 and particulate matters in the
urban area of Castello´n-Spain. They reported a decrease in the concentrations of SO 2 and particulate
matters in winter months due to strong prevailing wind while measured concentrations in summer
were higher than recorded in winter months.
Seiber et al (1996) estimated flux values using ISCST3 model and compared with
CALPUFF for airborne methyl bromide downwind of a treated agricultural field. The ISCST3
model, under predicted concentrations for 76% of data while the CALPUFF model also under
predicted 67% of observations.
Yates et al (1996) also estimated the flux values and observed that ISCST3 model over-
predicted concentrations by a factor of 2 for 67% of data and the CALPUFF over-predicted
concentrations by a factor of 1.6 for over 50% of data.
Anh, et al (1998) present a generic reaction set (GRS) model which offers a convenient
framework for studying the photochemical smog production. The performance of the model has been
found comparable to more detailed photo chemical mechanisms such as the CBM – IV. The
presentation also discusses about the GRS model expansion to include spatial advection and
diffusion in the airshed. The expanded model is implemented on a simple grid of seven stations in
the Sydney monitoring network. Comparison with observed data indicates that the model performs
quite well, in particular, it traces the ozone episodes accurately.
SPECIMEN
REFERENCES
2. Aggarwal A.L, Sivacoumar R. and Goyal SK Air Quality Prediction : influence of model
parameters and sensitivity analysis, Indian Journal of Environmental Protection, 1997, 17(9),
650-655.