Item Analysis and Validation Module
Item Analysis and Validation Module
1. Determine the characteristics of the entire test by analyzing each item through
item analysis and index of discrimination.
2. Determine the validity of the instrument as to appropriateness, correctness,
meaningfulness, and usefulness.
3. Illustrate how item analysis and index of discrimination are done by solving
problems and showing examples.
A. Teacher’s Input
Item Analysis
Item analysis is the study of each item in a test to determine the effectiveness
of the entire test. It is done after an examination has been administered and
scored. There are many procedures that may be applied. The most common is by
analysing the difficulty of the item and the discriminating power of the item from
the number of students who answered the item correctly, considering the upper
group and the lower group of the distribution. It is either by using 1/3 of the upper
group and 1/3 of the lower group or ¼ of the upper group and ¼ of the lower
group.
2. This will allow the teacher to decide whether to revise or replace an item in a test.
Each item in a test is analyzed in terms of difficulty and its ability to discriminate.
Page | 68
3. Provide insights and skills that lead to the preparation of better tests in the
future.
1. Item Difficulty
This gives information of the difficulty of the item as to easy, with right difficulty
or difficult to have an action whether to discard, retain or revise the item.
2. Discrimination Index
ITEM DIFFICULTY
Item difficulty tells us whether the item is difficult, with right difficulty or
easy to have an action whether to discard, retain, or revise the item.
Formula:
Ru + RL
2. P x 100
T
Where:
Table of Interpretation
Page | 69
If P = 0 the item is extremely difficult
If P = 1 the item the item is extremely easy
INDEX OF DISCRIMINATION
Index of discrimination is the ability to answer the problems by those who know and
those who are merely guessing specially to the difficult items because easy items cannot be
discriminated by these two groups of learner. This can be inferred from the difference between
the number of proportion of respondents of the upper group who got the item right and the
proportion of the respondents of the lower group who got the item right. The index is
dependent upon the difficulty of the item.
Formula:
Where:
Item discrimination indices are interpreted in the context of the type of test which is
being analysed. Items with low discrimination indices should be examined. Negative indices
should be scrutinized to determine why a negative value was obtained. (It may be mis-keyed or
unkeyed)
Values of discrimination indices are classified as a) ‘good “ if the index is above 0.30;
b.) “fair “ if it is between 0.10 and 0.30; and c.) “poor” if is below 0.10.
The smaller is the index the more difficult is the item. Maximum discriminating power is
indicated by an index of 1.0.
A good item is one that has good discriminating power. It is not too difficult or too easy.
Page | 70
VALIDATION
- The process of collecting and analysing the evidences to support the meaningfulness
and usefulness of the test. Validation of instrument comes after performing the
item analysis and revision.
Purpose of Validation
To determine the characteristics of the whole test itself, namely the validity and
reliability of the test.
Relationship between scores obtained using the instrument and scores obtained
using one or more other tests. Scores are compared with scores on some other test
which presumes has already high quality. How strong is the relationship? How well
such scores estimate present or predict future performance of a certain type?
Page | 71
Application:
1. In the table below summarises the answers of 36 students who took the 100-item multiple
choice test in English 1 subjecting item 20 for ITEM analysis with letter d as the correct answer.
Shall we retain, revise, or discard item number 20?
Solution;
Solution using the upper 25% right responses and lower 25% right responses
Step 1. Arrange the test scores from highest to the lowest value.
Suggestion: Use a master sheet of scores to arrange the scores fast without missing any
value.
Procedure:
99-Highest score
73- Lowest score
2 – The difference of their tens digits
+ 4 - constant
6 – This represents the number of horizontal lines in the table counting from
the range of lowest score to highest score.
13 – is the constant which represents the number of vertical lines in the table.
Page | 72
Step 2. Tally the scores in a table
0 1 2 3 4 5 7 86 9 T
9 II III II I I 9
8 I III I II IIIIIIIII III 19
7 I II I I I II 8
T 3 0 3 2 4 7 2 7 2 6 36
Step 3. Determine the scores to be found on the upper and lower 25% of the distribution.
25% = 36 x 0.25 = 9
1. 99-B 80-B
2. 98-B 79-C
3. 97-B 79-D
4. 97-A 78-A
5. 95-E 77-B
6. 95-B 76-D
7. 95- B 74-A
8. 90-B 74-D
9. 90-B 73-A
Option A B C D E TOTAL
Upper 25% 1 7 0 0 1 9
Lower 25% 3 2 1 3 O 9
Step 4. Solve for the Item difficulty and the discrimination index of the item by using the
formula and interpret the results.
Item number 20 by interpretation using the table has right difficulty therefore it should be
retained.
2. Discrimination Index = Difficulty of the upper group – Difficulty of the lowest group
Discrimination index of 0.56 in the table is interpreted as discriminating item and therefore item
number 20 should be included in the test.
Page | 73
Step 5. Describe the characteristics of the descriptors:
Option A-good; option B- good; option C-good; option D-good; option E-poor
Option E is a poor option because some of the upper group answer Option E while no one
answer Option E in the lower group. Option E therefore is questionable. It might be that this
option is not clearly stated or presented.
B. Student’s Input
a) Activity
1. The table below reflects the scores in a 100-item multiple choice test taken by 30
students in mathematics I and their answers in item number 7 with letter E as the
correct response. Subjecting this item (number 7) for analysis, compute the Item
Difficulty and the Discrimination Index of the item and interpret your findings?
Page | 74
Work folio
Page | 75
Work folio
Page | 76
b) Reflection
Page | 77
c) Summative Statement and Evaluation
Page | 78
d) Documentary Proof of Learning
Page | 79
e) My performance in the learning episode
Page | 80