Lesson 1.3
Lesson 1.3
Lesson 1.3
3: COMMUNICATION ETHICS
Introduction // OVERVIEW
Ethics are moral values of good conduct that guide one's action, whether or not they are
governed by laws or policies. In communication, our rhetoric, along with our actions, creates
the sort of person that we are; thus, all thinking individuals constantly evaluate the words they
let out of their mouths, aiming for integrity in their language habits. This is the mark of an
ethical communicator.
Communication in the digital age has resulted in current transformations raising interrelated
questions about ethics. Upon browsing your social media account, you are unlikely to
encounter immature contents and misleading judgments expressed ubiquitously without any
corroboration. Displays of fake news currently proliferate the Internet, ignoring all
communication ethics.……….………………………………………………………………………….
Preliminary Questions/Diagnosis
Our religious upbringing, and philosophical and cultural ideals shape our communication
ethics. However, bad judgement may cloud our thoughts, thus, disrupting our morals. As a
stabilizing agent, we may consider time-tested ideals that have been useful in communication.
1. Socrates, Thomas Hobbles, and John Locke posit in social contract theory that
people in society have an unwritten agreement with one another (Staubhaaret al.,
2014). For example, new organizations uphold their social responsibility of reporting
news with integrity.
2. Aristotle’s Nicomachean ethics asserts that virtue is a state between the extremes of
excess and deficiency. A righteous person feels pleasure in behaving rightly.
3. The golden rule, “Do unto other as you would have them do unto you”, is from the
Bible. This was also taught by the Chinese philosopher, Confucius. In the context of
communication, this means everyone must treat each other fairly and respectfully.
4. The principle of honesty decrees that you should not deceive other people. One way
of deceiving people is by lying to mislead them intentionally. Another is through various
nonverbal communication, such as conveying false information by employing a
misrepresentative body language.
Ethical Communicators are not concerned with just who or what or when, but all four
dimensions simultaneously.
1. Plagiarism
2. Selective Misquoting
3. Misrepresenting Numbers
4. Distorting Visuals
PLAGIARISM
This is defined as the act of presenting another author’s work and claiming it your own.
Although there is nothing wrong with quoting a person, “copying and pasting” passages
without sighting the source is considered fraud and, therefore, illegal and unethical.
SELECTIVE MISQUOTING
The Cambridge dictionary defines misquoting as the repetition of something someone
has said in a way that is not accurate. Unlike plagiarism, selective misquoting is
deliberately misrepresenting and altering the meaning of someone’s work by taking it
out of context. To a larger extent, essential information is omitted to fabricate a better
but false picture of an individual or institution.
MISREPRESENTING NUMBERS
This is unethical manipulation of data by increasing, decreasing, altering statistics or
omitting data. A case in point is the Philippine senator who came under fire after
presenting suspicious data showing a drastic drop of murder cases in the Philippines in
2016. The senator’s presentation did not cover similar time periods. The data he plotted
from 2010 all covered full years while 2016 covered only 216 days. The senator’s graph
all significantly differed from the Philippine National Police’s record of crimes in 2016.
DISTORTING VISUALS
Have you ever been disappointed after ordering a certain item on the menu because
they look much bigger on the photo? This is a business strategy with which the
populace does not agree. Visuals are distorted by making a product look bigger or
smaller to bait customers.