Plant Disease Detection Using Deep Learning: Anjaneya Teja Kalvakolanu
Plant Disease Detection Using Deep Learning: Anjaneya Teja Kalvakolanu
Plant Disease Detection Using Deep Learning: Anjaneya Teja Kalvakolanu
I. INTRODUCTION
Implementation of RGB and Gray scale images in plant disease
T his Research is focused on Detection of diseases that plant is
affected by using deep learning. The images of affected plant
leaves are taken as input and are sent through a network trained
detection in leaves a study by Padmavathi and Thangadurai have
given the comparative results of RGB and Gray scale images in
using transfer learning from resent 34 and resent 50. We disease finding process from leaves. Color is an important feature
considered three plants for this research Potato, Tomato, Bell in detecting the infected leaves. Color also identifies the intensity
pepper. In particular the diseases with plants considered are early They have considered Grayscale and RGB images and used
blight, mosaic virus, late blight, leaf mold, bacterial Spot, Leaf median filter for image enhancement and segmentation for
curl, Target spot ,spider mite. In addition we also considered extraction of the diseased portion which are used to identify the
Healthy plants as a class. The classes are divided based on plant disease intensity. They identified 13 different diseases from the
and disease type since each plant has a different leaves shape and healthy leaves with the capability to differentiate from the
many diseases appear similar on same plant. We used transfer surroundings from the leaves.
learning with both resent 34 and resnet 50 as our base model. We
trained the model with around 4000 images with discriminative
learning . we achieved an accuracy of 99.44% which is current
state of art for this dataset.
II. BACKGROUND
III. EXPERIMENT
There has been fast paced research for Plant disease detection
using images in the recent years. Penn state has created their own The transfer learning is done using both resent 34 and resnet 50.
Plant village has developed their own dataset to create a deep The data set obtained has over 4000 images that are divide in to
learning model for detection of diseases in plants. There have classes based on the plant type and disease type. The pre
been many models developed and tested on the plant village processing include data augmentation. The images are flipped,
dataset. Methods like segmentation are used to detect the affected warped, transformed to make the dataset more generic.
part of the leaves and they are classified using the deep learning
methods. Vgd is used to classify the images and they achieved an
accuracy of 97.2. In order to develop image classifiers for the
purposes of plant disease detection , there is a requirement of
large and verified dataset of healthy and diseased plants. Until
plant village such dataset is not available.
2
V. RESULTS
The model is trained with 3e-03 learning rate only for the newly
added layers. We tried working with both resnet 34 and resnet 50 even
though resnet 50 achieved better accuracy than resnet 34 (99.1%)
3
VI. CONCLUSION
Our proposed model with Discriminative learning rate
achieved an accuracy of 99.44 percent which is the current state
of art for this dataset. New data can be added to train the model
and this will not lower the accuracy because of the regularization
and deeper layers of resnet 50. This work can be further extended
by adding more data and training the network.
REFERENCES
Top most losses : Predicted/Actual/Loss/Probability
[1] Mohanty, Sharada P., David P. Hughes, and Marcel Salathé. "Using deep
learning for image-based plant disease detection." Frontiers in plant
science 7 (2016): 1419.
[2] Martinelli, Federico, et al. "Advanced methods of plant disease detection. A
review." Agronomy for Sustainable Development 35.1 (2015): 1-25.
[3] Emmanuel, Plant village dataset, “Kaggle”, 2019.
[4] Jeremy howard, “Fast AI”, fastai.com
[5] Ferentinos, Konstantinos P. "Deep learning models for plant disease
detection and diagnosis." Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 145
(2018): 311-318.
.
4