ENG 475-2022 Syllabus
ENG 475-2022 Syllabus
Margaret Oakes
Wednesdays, 2:30-5:20 FH 100-E
FH 121 Office phone: 294-3148
Email for any appointment
anytime!
In the English major literature track senior seminar, students will develop an idea of their own
choosing into a literary critical essay of 4500-6000 words excluding a bibliography – that is, an
essay the length of a short scholarly article. The essay should develop significantly work that
the student has done in an English class thus far. It is theoretically possible for students to bring
a new idea to the table for this seminar, but in order to do so the student should show
convincing evidence of sufficient prior knowledge of the topic, as well as the discipline and
motivation to develop a wholly new idea in a semester.
Finished essays will demonstrate proficiency in developing a clear theoretical lens on a topic,
marshaling evidence from close reading and formal analysis of literature to formulate and
sustain a critical argument, and orienting this argument in context with current criticism on the
topic.
REQUIRED TEXTBOOKS
Booth, Wayne C., Gregory G. Columb, Joseph M. Williams. The Craft of Research, Third Edition,
U of C P, 2008, ISBN 9780226065663
Hayot, Eric. The Elements of Academic Style: Writing for the Humanities, Columbia UP, 2014 ISBN
978-0-231-16801-4
https://furman-my.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/personal/moakes_furman_edu/
EcGh1w_m4LJOs0Q02irY1FQBrBHcMq0DKjcaUc1oZw8akg?e=z6iETu
I STRONGLY suggest that you print out the portions we are reading – trying to work on your
computer in class and read a textbook on your computer in class is ridiculously ineffective (and
looks silly as you frantically scroll around and flip between apps)
2. Plagiarism: will not be tolerated in this course. Penalties for plagiarism may range from
failure of an assignment to expulsion from the university, depending on the seriousness of the
offense. You are expected to know the Furman policies on this matter on the Furman University
website at https://www.furman.edu/academics/academic-resources/academic-integrity/ If you
have a question about using cited material or comments from your peer workshops, please
consult me to avoid problems.
Jan. 12: In-class: Students develop a project proposal, including research questions which will
expand previous work, a timeline of work for the term, and an organizational scheme for data
collection and writing/editing.
Jan. 19 2:30 Advanced research instruction with a research librarian ON ZOOM IN SOME
LOCATION WHERE YOU CAN BE UNMASKED.
3:30-5:20 – reading assignment: Hayot, Chs. 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7, and Booth, et al Chs. 2, 3 and 4.
Discussion of writing a scholarly argument – content and process, why and how (no virtuous
procrastination!)
Jan. 25: DUE -- a preliminary list of possible sources (in addition to any already used in a
previous iteration of the project)
DURING THE WEEK OF JANUARY 24: students begin weekly meeting/check-in with content
advisors for suggestions on researching and developing topics.
DURING THE WEEK: students will meet individually with a research librarian
Feb. 2 Round table discussion with guest speakers Dr. Nick Radel and Dr. Jeanne Provost to
discuss research methods in literary studies – what works, what doesn’t.
We will sign up today for a schedule to share feedback in writing workshop format starting Feb.
9.
Feb. 8 DUE Comprehensive argument template (enhanced outline in full sentences with
potential sources identified for sections of the argument) AND annotated bibliography of
potential sources (at least 15).
Feb. 9 Begin writing workshops -- students will have page assignments to meet, and each week
a given segment of the seminar will share their work with the class. Some weeks we will have
individual conferences with me or group conferences with your writing groups.
Feb. 16
Feb. 22 DUE -- FIRST DRAFT– at least eight pages
Feb. 23
March 2
March 16
March 22 DUE -- SECOND DRAFT– close to finished length, but needs lots of revision and
cleanup
March 23
March 30
April 6