Evolution of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Laws

in India

By Hritika Sharma
(She have pursued LLM (Corporate & Commercial Laws) from WBNUJS in the year 2020.
Currently, she is associated with a Law Firm 'Swasti Legal' wherein her key responsibility is to
represent clients before NCLT.)

1
IBC Laws | All about Indian Insolvency Laws www.ibclaw.in
 List of Abbreviation

SL NO. ABBREVIATION FULL FORM

1. BLRC Bankruptcy Law Reforms Committee

2. DRT Debts Recovery Tribunal

3. DRAT Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal

4. IRP Insolvency Resolution Process

5. NCLT National Company Law Tribunal

6. NCLAT National Company Appellate Tribunal

7. OC Operational Creditor

8. RDDBFI Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and

9. SARFAESI Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial

Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest

2
IBC Laws | All about Indian Insolvency Laws www.ibclaw.in
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Chapter Chapter Name Page No.

No.

List of Abbreviation 2

Table of Contents 3

Chapter 1 Introduction 4-6

Chapter 2 Need for Bankruptcy Laws in India 6-8

Chapter 3 The Evolution of Bankruptcy Laws in India 8-9

Chapter 4 The Principle Legislation for Corporate Insolvency 9-10

Chapter 5 Progression of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 10-17

Chapter 6 Conclusion and Suggestions 17

Bibliography

Contents
List of Abbreviation ................................................................................................................................. 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS............................................................................................................................... 3
INTRODUCTION: ...................................................................................................................................... 5
SCOPE OF STUDY: ................................................................................................................................ 5
OBJECTIVES: ........................................................................................................................................ 5
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: ............................................................................................................... 5
SCHEME OF CHAPTERISATION: ........................................................................................................... 6
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 6
CHAPTER 2: NEED FOR BANKRUPTCY LAWS IN INDIA .................................................................... 6

3
IBC Laws | All about Indian Insolvency Laws www.ibclaw.in
 CHAPTER 3: EVOLUTION OF INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY LAWS IN INDIA .............................. 6
CHAPTER 4: The PRINCIPLE LEGISLATION FOR CORPORATE INSOLVENCY ..................................... 7
CHAPTER 5: PROGRESSION OF INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 ............................... 7
CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS .............................................................................. 7
NEED FOR BANKRUPTCY LAWS IN INDIA ................................................................................................ 8
THE EVOLUTION OF BANKRUPTCY LAWS IN INDIA ............................................................................... 10
Indian Insolvency Act, 1848 .............................................................................................................. 10
Administration towns Insolvency Act, 1909 ..................................................................................... 10
THE PRINCIPLE LEGISLATION FOR CORPORATE INSOLVENCY ............................................................... 12
PROGRESSION OF INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 ......................................................... 13
The Bankruptcy Law Reforms Committee Report ............................................................................ 13
The significant commendations of the report are in the following way: ......................................... 14
Financial and Operational creditors’ difference: .......................................................................... 14
Uniform Legislation ....................................................................................................................... 14
Trigger ........................................................................................................................................... 15
Supervision of the entity in the course of IRP: ............................................................................. 15
Moratorium................................................................................................................................... 15
Creditor Committee: ..................................................................................................................... 16
Time bound Insolvency Resolutions: ............................................................................................ 16
No restrictions on solutions to resolve the Insolvency: ................................................................ 16
Time-Bound Liquidation with Defined Pay-out Prioritization....................................................... 17
CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS................................................................................... 19
BIBLIOGRAPHY ...................................................................................................................................... 20
d. https://ibbi.gov.in/BLRCReportVol1_04112015.pdf............................................................ 21
e. https://drt.gov.in .................................................................................................................... 21
f. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Company_Law_Tribunal ....................................... 21
g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Company_Law_Appellate_Tribunal ...................... 21

4
IBC Laws | All about Indian Insolvency Laws www.ibclaw.in
 INTRODUCTION:
When a person, company, association or any other institution do not fulfil its money related
obligation it is known as Insolvency, it is basically a state of being not able to pay the money
borrowed by an individual or company within a specified time on the other hand the
expression bankruptcy is nothing but a ground which makes a company or an organisation
capable to file a petition in the court of law in the situation when it fails to fulfil any financial
obligation or repay the owed amount to the creditors. The petition is supposed to be lodged in
the court where each and every outstanding debts of an organisation are valued and cashed
out. Bankruptcy lodging is a lawful approach carried out by an organisation to free itself from
any financial or debt obligation. Debts which are basically not fully paid to the lenders and
creditors. However the procedure to be followed in the event of filing a petition for
bankruptcy varies in different countries for instance in India if an individual files a petition
for bankruptcy, it will not be good for his credit rating as the filing of bankruptcy will make it
very hard for a company to get a fresh loan from any creditor. It can occur due to event of
specific things such as substandard money administration, increment in original money costs,
or depletion in cash flow and the list goes on. There was a time when India spotted the
industries are being surrounded by rampant industrial illness which gave rise to the situations
where creditors remained unpaid which was certainly influencing the interest of creditors and
lenders as they did not have any instrument to recover their money, this is when it has been
realized that there is a need of an enactment which will regulate the expressions such as
insolvency and bankruptcy. Consequently huge efforts made to set up a framework in order
to deal with the same.

SCOPE OF STUDY:
The chapter pays special attention on knowing by what means Indian legislation and
regulation with concern to the insolvency resulted in the development of insolvency and
bankruptcy Code 2016, by examining the existing legislation came into existence for the
purpose to regulate the acts arising out of liquidation.

OBJECTIVES:
The principle goal of this research is to find out how Indian legislation with concern to the
insolvency caused to the evolvement of insolvency and bankruptcy laws in India.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY:
The methodology followed in this research will be purely doctrinal in nature. This research is
on the “evolution and origin of insolvency and bankruptcy in India”. Therefore the researcher
will be dealing mainly with the doctrinal material available. Since various doctrinal resources
are very easily available on this particular topic, thus the researcher has contracted mainly on
such resources and has dealt in all such resources in a comparative manner and analytical
nature.

The researcher will be taking help of various primary sources 1 such as text of the Company
Act,1956 Company Act 2013, Sick Industrial Companies Act, 1985( SICA), Securitisation

1
Bare acts

5
IBC Laws | All about Indian Insolvency Laws www.ibclaw.in
and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI),
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC),The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
(Insolvency Professional Agencies) Regulations 2016, The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board
of India (Model Bye-Laws and Governing Board of Insolvency Professional Agencies)
Regulations 2016, The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Professionals)
Regulations 2016, The Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority)
Rules 2016, The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process
for Corporate Persons) Regulations,2016 and Bankruptcy Law Reforms Committee. The
secondary sources that the researcher will use are the various books, cases, journals, articles
and papers relating to this topic. The researcher will be making extensive use of both such
primary and secondary sources in this research

SCHEME OF CHAPTERISATION:

The Research Paper has been categorised into six chapters, which are as follows:

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

This chapter basically focuses on introducing the topic by answering what is Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code, why it came into existence and more on. Along with that this chapter also
talks about the objective of study, scope of study, hypothesis and research methodology.

CHAPTER 2: NEED FOR BANKRUPTCY LAWS IN INDIA

We all know that Law ensures the protection of our rights. To conduct any act appropriately
we need Law further an individual cannot live in society without Law as it oversees
everything it punishes every wrongful act so in consideration with that this chapter aims to
make things easier to understand that why there is a need of legislation to regulate bankruptcy
and insolvency.

CHAPTER 3: EVOLUTION OF INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY

LAWS IN INDIA

As the name says “evolution” this chapter will discuss about how expressions like insolvency
and bankruptcy gained popularity in the business field. What is the significance of it? The
same chapter will make the reader aware of the present status of Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Code.

6
IBC Laws | All about Indian Insolvency Laws www.ibclaw.in
CHAPTER 4: The PRINCIPLE LEGISLATION FOR CORPORATE
INSOLVENCY

Again this chapter examines the principle legislation for corporate insolvency and how it
plays significant role in protecting the rights of a creditor by laying down procedure to be
followed in the event of liquidation. It also talks about the placement of “Insolvency and
Bankruptcy” in the concurrent list mention under Schedule 7 of Indian Constitution.

CHAPTER 5: PROGRESSION OF INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY

CODE, 2016

The main objective of this chapter is to inspect about the factors which caused the
progression of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016. It also pays attention to the report of
“Bankruptcy Law Reforms Committee” and its significance. Furthermore this chapter states
about the role Insolvency “Adjudicating Authority” in resolving the issues concerning the
same, bankruptcy and insolvency.

CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS

The last chapter aims to provide suggestions regarding protection of rights for both the
creditor and the borrower along with it gives an idea and a way forward also.

7
IBC Laws | All about Indian Insolvency Laws www.ibclaw.in
 NEED FOR BANKRUPTCY LAWS IN INDIA
The Crucial focus of existing bankruptcy enactment and finance obligation reconstructing
acts is by no means the liquidation and discontinuance of matter of insolvency but somewhat
on the renewal of the substances concerning capital and gradable construction of account
possessors confronting issues concerning money for the purpose of allowing the restoration
and business of themselves. There are other parts as well, where it is a crime in context to the
bankruptcy laws for a business to move forward in the world of business whilst blotted out.
To regulate any activity we depend on law, the aim of any legislation is to balance things
which are good for society and a decent society needs laws so that an individual’s right
remains protected. For instance if we talk about traffic laws, what will happen if there is
no traffic laws isn’t there will be chaos everywhere. Yes there will be, thus we understand
that nothing could remain regulated unless and until a mechanism regulates it and for us that
mechanism is so called legislation. The same goes for bankruptcy and insolvency also,
any new age company would require capital to flourish thus it will take loan, it is
compelled to borrow money but in the event it defaults to fulfil its obligation owed to
creditors then creditors will start losing the interest to lend money so basically there is
need to protect the interest of lender so that the process of borrowing and lending will
be continue which even helps the country to grow the economy so we understand that
everything is interlinked with each other and virtually benefitting us, this is why it becomes
very important to ensure that this remains active and that the interest of a creditor remains
protected thus the legislation related to indebtness was needed.

The legislation for indebtness is nothing but a cordial statute which has been set in motion to
provide interval as well as assuagement to the equitable account possessors who for the
reason any kind of serious or unexpected requirement end up clearly incompetent for
repayment of their commitments.2

Its query is in addition of guaranteeing dissemination of an indebted person’s sphere amongst

his creditors in an impartial manner and on the basis of that point to dismiss him pursuant to
particular circumstances from taking a chance concerning to his commitments.

If we look into the Act of bankruptcy we find that it has been certainly ignored. In the event
that a person is declared insolvent, he is not viewed as trustworthy. Despite whatever has
been said the statute of bankruptcy safeguards the account holder from the embarrassment,
humiliation and abuse of his creditors.

In a case when a person is pronounced bankrupt, his creditors are exiled from filing any suit
or legal procedures in counter to him as well as they cannot even look for any remedy against
his assets related to their commitments supportable under the law of indebtness. On
arbitration of a debtor as destroyed his whole assets entrust to official collector. His banks are
anxious on the betterment of their commitments than confronting the individuals being
indebted. Consequently after vesting interest of assets in official beneficiary, it is believed

2
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Insolvency-and-Bankruptcy-Code-2016

8
IBC Laws | All about Indian Insolvency Laws www.ibclaw.in
that they are disburdening of being deceived by the one indebted person or of the concern of
the account possessor taking away his assets.3 The indebted, in case any circumstance flies
far away from the location of the Insolvency Court, it not in any way disturbs them as the
authentic consignee being the person in whom the property of the bankrupt entrusted. On the
top of that their commitments are to be recognized on the basis of returns collected by
recipients in the formal discharge of his abilities within the Insolvency law.

Speaking about the way about liquidation of an association is regulated according to

Companies Act and is under the auspices of the court. But as per the Article 19 (1)(g) of the
Constitution of India it says about the ability to exercise whatsoever profession or to keep on
any occupation, trade or business to the every inhabitants of India, there are restrictions on
completion of any contemporary endeavour. Aforementioned constraint is protected on the
basis that it is in extensive dawn eagerness to anticipate the state of being unemployed. In
view of fact that such strategy there is a possibility to seek any liberal action, nevertheless
there is no elasticity to exit.

3
IBC an on-going process

9
IBC Laws | All about Indian Insolvency Laws www.ibclaw.in
 THE EVOLUTION OF BANKRUPTCY LAWS IN INDIA
In the Presidency – towns the foremost Insolvency court were put in place by means of
statute 9 Geo.4,c. 73, go in the year 18284. Basically those were the courts established to help
the Insolvent Debtors. They were individual courts as well as courts of records. Any person
disturbed because of the choice of the abovementioned court can move or proceed to the
Supreme Court which is to be regarded as above all. The Supreme Court organized the
capacity to hear the collection and transfer such kind of requests as it distinguished fair and
considerable and identical application or demand is to be deferred through the courts for the
mitigation of insolvent or the borrower. The workers of the court of insolvency were
entrusted by the Supreme Court. One of such official was regarded as “normal appointee”. In
the event that an appeal for mediation was initiated or originated by one lender as well an
order for arbitration was created the property interest of the indebted entrusted in the simple
selected one by uprightness of the request. Agreement was in further made for the break
guarantee orders.

Indian Insolvency Act, 1848

It was the year 1848 when the past approvals were revoked and other Act was adopted so-
called the Indian Insolvency Act, being 11 and 12 Vict. c. 21.5 The Act stored the provisions
among all merchants and non-brokers make specific reference6. Through this Act the Courts
only for the alleviation of Insolvent Debtors established by the Act of 1828 were supposed to
be moved however the Court was to take place within the persistent watch of judges of
Supreme Court.

Administration towns Insolvency Act, 1909

In advance of agenda in the twentieth century it was believed that the Indian Insolvency Act,
1848 has proven out to be antiquated and it was elected or we can say nominated to
create separate law based on English Bankruptcy Acts. Same Act i.e. The Act of 1848
was to be believed as having no value or so called annulled and consequently a different
separate Act was approved in 1909 being the Presidency-towns Insolvency Act7 taking
into account of the Bankruptcy demonstration 1883 and the Bankruptcy Act 1890. As
everything has a flaw likewise the Indian Insolvency Act also has its own flaws, one of the
main and solid defaults was that the Act was rather benefitting the borrowers to greater
extent but not lenders. The troops of legal assignee were exceedingly restrained. He just
brought assets together and had no strength to consider the measures. By means of new Act
enormous strength was provided rather given to the courts to push the disclosure of the
indebted property. Section 79 speaks and requires the official trustee to investigate or inspect
the case of bankruptcy and provide an answer or respond to the court upon whatsoever
application for liberating stating whether there is encouragement to trust that the wiped out

4
Evolution of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016
5
Some Emerging Trends In The Evolution of Insolvency And Bankruptcy Code
6
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC)
7
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Practice Manual

10
IBC Laws | All about Indian Insolvency Laws www.ibclaw.in
had granted any indebtedness crimes or certain other crimes mentioned under segment 421 to
424 of the Indian Penal Code8 with concern to his indebtedness or which would justify the
court in cannot, interrupting or limiting a request for his release.

8
Administration towns insolvency Act,1909

11
IBC Laws | All about Indian Insolvency Laws www.ibclaw.in
THE PRINCIPLE LEGISLATION FOR CORPORATE INSOLVENCY
The Indian Constitution set up in 1950 provides listed the expressions such as “Insolvency”
and “Bankruptcy” in the third list of schedule 7 i.e. concurrent List. On the other hand, the
terms such as incorporation, command and liquidation of enterprises are mentioned under the
Union List.

With these strengths or we can say strong points provided in the Constitution, Companies
Act, 1956 came into the existence which gave a new shape to corporate field. In fact this
Act contained virtually all provisions concerned or related to the workings of companies
along with the process of winding up. And it is believed that it even decreased the fraudulent
activities. But the main point to be noted is the despite the Act was a good initiative by the
government but the other fact which attempts to say that this Act never made any sense
with regard to expressions like insolvency or bankruptcy and has no power to deal with
payment of debts notwithstanding that this Act was chief law for the purpose of
adjusting corporate bankruptcy. The Companies Act, 1956 included particular measures
by which the association or its lenders could try to restructure it. However, these were
particular regulations and not specific to bankruptcy or insolvency conditions.

It is noteworthy and important to know that in the year two thousand thirteen, there were
approximately 13.5 lakh enrolled organisations in our country India of which only 9.4 lakh
were active. Strangely enough on a regular note in the proximity of 2008 and 2010, not more
than 6,455 cases of twisting up were enlisted with the High Courts. Just near two hundred to
three hundred cases were incorporated each and every year and above that approximately
three hundred to six hundred fifty completed each year. These characteristics or we can say
indicators showed that the less application of the Companies Act approaches for handling
corporate indebtedness. Furthermore it demonstrates a deficiency of limit at the courts to deal
with such case volumes. Occasional evidence suggests or rather prefers that winding up or
liquidation under the said Act, generally, requires nearly five to seven years getting end as
well as in exorbitant cases evening twenty six to thirty one years.

However there was a time when innumerable changes concerned with the insolvency related
measures mentioned under Companies Act, 1956 was proposed by the Act so called “The
Companies (Amendment) Act, 2003”. Be that as it may these couldn’t be successful since
legitimate challenges.

Following this in the year 2013 the new Companies Act was approved. And a significant
proportion of the measures of the 2013 Act were in conformity with those planned under the
last amendment which occurred in the year 2002. Implementation issues concerning to the
corporate insolvency measures moved equal with the new Companies Act, 2013.

12
IBC Laws | All about Indian Insolvency Laws www.ibclaw.in
PROGRESSION OF INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016
The Bankruptcy Law Reforms Committee Report
In 2014, an essential struggle at far sighted bankruptcy amendment was cherished when the
Ministry of Finance established by the by the Bankruptcy Law Reforms Committee
(BLRC) under the Chairmanship of Dr. T. K Viswanathan9. The order of the BLRC was to
specify an Indian Bankruptcy Code that supposed to be relevant to entire non- financial
associated corporations and people as an individual, and would supersede the present
system. The aforementioned committee submitted its report and a deep seated proposal
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) to the administration in November 2015.

The Committee put forward its report on December 4, 2015 which is believed to be divided
into two sections comprises of “volume one” and “volume two”. Volume – 1 of the report
lays down the base and structure on the other hand Volume – 2 of report certainly talked
about the absolute draft of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, coating the whole
matter. The technique of Insolvency settlement and winding up under the code is
asseverated on the escorting institutional foundation.

I. A comptroller especially, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India10

(Regulator);
II. A structure of directed insolvency professionals and controlled data utilities
III. The adjudicating management, in particular the National Company Law Tribunal
which governs corporate components as well as the Debt Recovery Tribunals which
supervises number of people.
As a consequence, the Code suggests for the coverage of the full gamut of entities, not just
only corporate entities along with limited liability partnerships, but on top of that individuals
also, and stipulates procedures for handling with issues concerned to bankruptcy for every
aforementioned entity.

The Code intends substituting the existing corporate insolvency regulations through a single
widespread law that

• authorizes entire lenders (whether secured, unsecured, domestic, international,

financial or operational) to activate determination procedures;
• makes it possible that the procedures of resolution to begin at the earliest as possible
as a sign of financial hardship ;
• permits for a sole platform to monitor whole insolvency and liquidation procedures;
• allows a soothe duration wherein fresh prosecution do not dissuade current ones;
• lays down for substituting present administration throughout insolvency processes
while balancing the undertaking in the normal operation;

9
The Bankruptcy Law Reforms Committee Report

10
https://ibc.taxmann.com/

13
IBC Laws | All about Indian Insolvency Laws www.ibclaw.in
 • provides a bounded time limit during the time the debtor’s practicability can be
evaluated: and
• Sets out a lineal liquidation instrument.

The significant commendations of the report are in the following way:

Financial and Operational creditors’ difference:

The Code speaks about a difference between financial lenders (both ensured and unsecured,
who have expanded loan for interest, as distinguished from in interchange for the provisions
of goods and services). This distinction have been achieved for the purpose to

• address one and the other, secured and unsecured creditors, at face value with the
object to create an IRP and offer an opportunity or chance to take part in the policy
making procedures;
• Empower a functional lender to activate an IRP, but will not be involved in the
making of a decision because aforementioned creditor is paid for the liquidation
process, they cannot participate in the decision making process because
aforementioned creditors would be paid the winding up value at the very least.
The Code makes difference between financial creditors (both secured and unsecured
lenders, who have expanded accredit for interest) on the other hand functional lenders
(who have expanded credit in place of goods and services). The dissimilarity is designed
at the management of the secured and unsecured lenders both on same conditions with the
object to initiate an IRP and supplying an window of luck to be involved in the resolution
making procedures; functional lender is capable to activate an IRP, because
aforementioned functional creditor is remunerated for the winding up procedures, they
cannot engage in the procedures of making resolutions.

Uniform Legislation

The code stipulates for a uniform law. Each and every previous legislations, enactments
concerning with insolvency and bankruptcy those are spread are to be carried within
the frame of single legislation. It abrogated couple of laws as well as modified half of
dozen regulations handling the expressions insolvency and bankruptcy. The Presidency
Towns Insolvency act, 1909 as well as the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 got
abrogated11. Companies Act, 2013, Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions)
Repeal Act, 2013, limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008, SARFAESI Act, 2002,
RDDBFI Act, 1993 and Indian Partnership Act, 1932 was modified following the passing
of the code12.

11
Some Emerging Trends In The Evolution of Insolvency And Bankruptcy Code
12
Bare acts

14
IBC Laws | All about Indian Insolvency Laws www.ibclaw.in
Trigger

The primary and main objective of the Code is to capture the suffering as well as settle it
at the earliest possible date and along with that it basically aimed to balance the chaos
between the lender and borrower by resolving the issue. To accomplish the same, it
provides an opportunity to the IRP to be launched on the occurrence of a unique
infringement. However the procedure is slightly diverse for all the borrowers or we can say
debtors, financial lenders and functional creditors which are explained below.

Financial creditors upon the occurrence of the payment default for amounts indebted to them
or any all of the other commercial lender can lodge a request cum application in front of
NCLT in order to activate the IRP. For an operational borrower cause spark in IRP, an
announcement by the Operational Creditor to the borrower on the event of the non-payment
is needed or required. Following this kind or type of updates, notification the borrower is
imperative to whether reimburse or provide rationale because of the subsistence for an
authentic dispute. Within specified time of ten working days if the defaulter omits to do such
condition from the notification which has been published, further the OC is authorized to
lodge a complaint before the appropriate authority i.e. NCLT for the purpose and in order to
initiate the IRP. Borrower like shareholders (an individual or an organisation who owns at
minimum one share of a company’s stock), administrative personnel and any other staff
member or who provider a particular service of a company13 are totally allowed to lodge for
an IRP on the occasion of a failure granted that aforementioned debtors should be eligible of
generating in-depth verified commercial details. The Code sets out provisions for
criminalization for fake and silly or lightweight triggers in an effort to dissuade lenders
mistakenly activating IRP.

Supervision of the entity in the course of IRP:

Merely that is logged with the controller can be nominated by the official being Adjudicator
at the time IRP as Resolution Professional. Aforesaid Resolution Professional is basically
needed to run without a hitch and handles the entity and besides the resources of the entity at
the time of the IRP i.e. insolvency resolution process. The Code makes it mandatory and
necessary and that adjourned administration of an entity or any agency to collaborate and
work together with the Resolution Professional. According to the Code the controller or
supervisor is accountable to stipulate the preparedness imperative by the Resolution
Professional and also to control the RP at the time IRP.

Moratorium

During the time of the IRP, a time limit moratorium of total one eighty day’s contrary to the
loan restoration activities plus any fresh cases registered against the borrower is meted out.
This moratorium can be prolonged by approximately ninety days in the case where said

13
https://ibbi.gov.in/BLRCReportVol1_04112015.pdf

15
IBC Laws | All about Indian Insolvency Laws www.ibclaw.in
adjudicating authorization is delighted for aforementioned prolongation. It happens just to
make sure or ensure the lender and the borrower that the resources are risk-free while the
time of discussions and to evaluate the practicability of the agency. At the time of
aforementioned moratorium within the control or guidance of the NCLT (National Company
Law Tribunal) the organized practitioners regulates the property.

Creditor Committee:

Each and every commercial concerned with the issue judgement are captured by the
commission of commercial lenders. Hereinafter issues judgements can be captured by the
commission such as in the case the prolongation of the functions of the agency, resolutions
concerned with the trade of enterprise or units, reorganization of on-going liabilities.
Borrower is called by creditor committee are to be approved by the majority of 75% of the
lenders with respect to the estimate of the financial liabilities indebted to them by the
borrower.

Time bound Insolvency Resolutions:

After the completion the agreement is accomplished by whereby the agency will be balanced
as working concern, afterwards the NCLT (National Company Law Tribunal) will conclude
the case regarding insolvency. In the event no settlement about the conclusion of discussions
is attained or if accomplished it infringes any regulation or it do not comply with the
conditions stipulated in the code, then the NCLT be allowed to pass an ordinance announcing
the agency or an entity as bankrupt and providing the time since which time the
extermination or liquidation will be considered to have begun.

No restrictions on solutions to resolve the Insolvency:

According to the Code there is zero limitation upon the approach in which the agency or the
entity will be remained to be functioned as a matter of consideration, which is supposed to be
determined and decided by the creditors committee by approving the same through the large
majority as happens in parliament to get any bill approved. Furthermore the proposition
which the RP set in front of the creditors committee, there is zero limitations enforced on
him. With the exception of majority of the vote of the creditor committee, the RP is to
corroborate the NCLT by mentioning that explanation arrived by the creditor committee
accomplishes the 3 requirement14 in particular;

i. The intended way out obviously indicates the reimbursement of whichever interim
finance which benefited through the entity. That the expenses of the IRP are to
remain remunerated in precedence over any separate payments.
ii. Afterwards the resolution is being implemented of the within a considerable
specified time frame all creditors or lenders not being the participants of the
14
Treaties on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code

16
IBC Laws | All about Indian Insolvency Laws www.ibclaw.in
 creditors committee are contributed is not infringing any regulation relevant to
entity.

Time-Bound Liquidation with Defined Pay-out Prioritization

In the event creditors committee not in any way arrive on an explanation or reach in any
solution within time limit of one eighty days, then spontaneously as a matter of course NCLT
will move a winding up order without any kind of exception in conjunction with ordinance to
nominate a liquidator suggested by the regulatory body, movement of resources as property
into the trust of liquidation, to be settled by the administrator and modifying the title of the
agency to incorporate the word “in liquidation” to its authentic title. Aforementioned entity’s
council is to be substituted by the lenders cum creditors committee. In accordance with the
Code the liquidator is accountable for making sure or ensuring the greatest estimate of the
resources of an agency in a productive way. The awareness so achieved by sell off of the
resources while the winding up is to be achieved to the liquidation trust along what will be
disseminated to lenders according to the specified ordinance of preference fulfilled in the
code.

Liquidation: According to the Code, the triggers for liquidation are as follows

•In the event the settlement plan omits to carry out the requirements as referred
aforementioned as well as the identical have been dismissed by the NCLT
• In the event creditors committee neglects to arrive at a settlement during the specified
duration.
• If the creditors committee determines for the winding up.
• Whichever the requirements of the determination scheme endorsed by the NCLT and
did not pursued by the debtor.
Order of priority15: The Code lays down the order of priority which is supposed to be used
only while allocation of the property. Here is the order of priority as provided under the
Code:

a.
expenses of IRP and liquidation
b.
guaranteed creditor and functioning fee for twenty four months
officers’ earnings due for 1 year
c.
d.
Unlatched creditors fee
e.
Whichever Central and State administration dues for total two years
f.
Any liabilities of creditors for whichever amount gratuitous following the
implementation of security interest.
g. Any leftover loan
h. Allocation of remained balance to shareholders
Whole allocation of resources will take fall into place according to the order of priority and it
would be extensive of the dues of the liquidator, which would be subtracted correspondingly
15
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Practice Manual

17
IBC Laws | All about Indian Insolvency Laws www.ibclaw.in
from each and every phases of the order of priority. This is to guarantee super-fast restoration
for each and every class of beneficiary. Following the termination of a determined duration
by means of passing of a winding up or liquidation order, then the liquidation process is an
irrevocable operation.

Anybody who is unhappy with the liquidation decision might choose an appeal to keep the
same in front the NCLAT on particular factors.

Penalties: The Code states for the sanctions in order to dissuade the counterfeit and unlawful
selling and trading by the promoters of the agency which give rise to the liquidation. For the
very first ever aforementioned type of regulations are being enacted by the Code.

Insolvency Adjudicating Authority: It is only the management who is answerable or we can

say accountable for the hearing and dismissing the cases by or contrary to the debtor.

Following are the aforementioned authorities.

a. The Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT): It was in the year 1993 when for the first time
Debt Recover Tribunals was enacted through an act in order to achieve speedy
resolutions so that banks can recover soon. Actually the Banks as well as financial
institution were facing a lot of delays and difficulties in recovering the capital or
money which has been lent along with that same institutions faced delays in
enforcement of securities pledged to them for loans availed. Wherever an amount
more than 10 lakhs has been borrowed, the case could be lodged in DRT. Talking
about the working we came to know that the working of a tribunal is same as working
of court16. Thus it must be the authority to listen and dismiss the cases or suits by or
contrary to the individuals and limitless liability partnership firms. Anybody unhappy
with the so called order of the DRT has the capacity to make a request or an appeal to
the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT). However aforementioned appeal
must be made within a time limit of 45 days of receiving the orders of DRT.
b. The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)17: It must be the authority as he has the
power to hear and decide the suits through or against the companies and limited
liability partnership firms. Anybody not happy by the ordinance of the NCLT can
write an appeal to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) and in
India the tribunal has sixteen benches, six at New Delhi (out of which one is the
principal bench) two at Ahmedabad, one at Prayagraj, one at Bengaluru, one at
Chandigarh, two at Chennai, one at Cuttack, one at the city of Assam i.e. Guwahati,
three at Hyderabad of which one is Amaravati, one at Jaipur, one at Kochi, two at
Kolkata and five at Mumbai of the two new benches approved to be established, one
each in Indore and Amaravati well the Indore bench is yet to be notified.
c. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT)18: It was for the first time
constituted under Section 410 of the Companies Act 2013 in order to hear the appeals

16
https://drt.gov.in
17
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Company_Law_Tribunal
18
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Company_Law_Appellate_Tribunal

18
IBC Laws | All about Indian Insolvency Laws www.ibclaw.in
 contrary to the ordinance of National Company Law Tribunals and it is in effect since
1st June, 2016. Any person or an individual who is not pleased by the decision
approved by the Regulator in consideration with insolvency officials or information
utilities could bring an appeal in existence to the NCLAT.

CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

The course of the Indian Government in building regulations concerned to insolvency and
bankruptcy must be to save the concern or interest of the participants involved in the
procedure of debt recovery. The regulations must not be disposed towards the safeguard of
merely single specific grade of parties. When an individual or a firm gets a loan then there
obvious opportunities that at the instance of the reimbursement the debtor might not repay the
debt as contracted. Aforementioned failure by an individual or firm is because of some
specific factors. When the responsibility connected to the debt are encountered subsequently
the equity owners is supposed to get the command as quick as the borrower fails the power
to handle is forwarded from the equity owners will have nothing else to do. Consequently at
any time when there is a failure there is a sort of race amongst the creditors and the debtor to
levy the amount as soon as possible. In lieu of that what is notified is that the lenders and the
debtor must discuss between themselves for the financial restructure in order to maintain the
essence of the company, business and the firm.

To keep a credit market healthy or in good shape there is a need as well as demand that there
must be a common or uniform law, which will contain each and every kind of creditors and
debtors and which certainly determine the right of the lenders when the debtor turn into
insolvent . The previous regulations were not capable in addressing the insolvency and
bankruptcy issues. So this resulted in need of a single uniform legislation which is efficient
and less time taking in restoring the debt. The BRLC laid down a rough outline so called
“Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016”. This code comprises the big amendments and latest
provisions which were not in existence in the previous insolvency regulations. The BLRC
resulted in the enactment of the “Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code”.

19
IBC Laws | All about Indian Insolvency Laws www.ibclaw.in
BIBLIOGRAPHY

Statutes

a. Company Act,1956
b. Company Act 2013,
c. Sick Industrial Companies Act, 1985( SICA),
d. Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of
Security Interest (SARFAESI),
e. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC),
f. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Professional
Agencies) Regulations 2016,
g. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Model Bye-Laws and
Governing Board of Insolvency Professional Agencies) Regulations 2016,
h. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Professionals)
Regulations 2016,
i. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules
2016,
j. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution
Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations,2016

Reports

a. The Bankruptcy Law Reforms Committee Report

Books

a. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016

b. Treaties on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
c. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Practice Manual

Articles

a. Evolution of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016

b. IBC an On-going Process
c. Some Emerging Trends In The Evolution of Insolvency And Bankruptcy Code
d. The report of the Bankruptcy Law Reforms Committee

News Articles and Other Web Resources

20
IBC Laws | All about Indian Insolvency Laws www.ibclaw.in
 a. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/Insolvency-and-Bankruptcy-
Code-2016
b. https://ibc.taxmann.com/
c. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insolvency_and_Bankruptcy_Code,_2016
d. https://ibbi.gov.in/BLRCReportVol1_04112015.pdf
e. https://drt.gov.in
f. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Company_Law_Tribunal
g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Company_Law_Appellate_Tribunal

Disclaimer

The Opinions expressed in this article are that of the author(s).The facts and opinions
expressed here do not reflect the views of http://www.ibclaw.in.

The opinions expressed herein are those of the contributors (which shall, for these purposes,
include guests) in their personal capacity and do not, in any way or manner, reflect the views
of the organizations that the contributors are presently associated with, or that have
previously employed or retained the contributors. Postings on this blog are for informational
purposes only. Nothing herein shall be deemed or construed to constitute legal or investment
advice. Discussions on, or arising out of this, blog between contributors and other persons
shall not create any attorney-client relationship.

21
IBC Laws | All about Indian Insolvency Laws www.ibclaw.in