Untitled
Untitled
Untitled
e-ISSN: 2319-2380, p-ISSN: 2319-2372. Volume 9, Issue 1 Ver. I (Jan. 2016), PP 48-58
www.iosrjournals.org
Abstract: Early blight disease caused by Alternaria solani is considered a serious challenge for potato
production. Four bacterial strains as biocontrol agents (Brevibacillus brevis, Pseudomonas
putida,Pseudomonas aerogenosa, Bacillus subtilis ) and potassium phosphite (kPhi) , copper (Cu) as well as
difenoconazole (Score) were tested to study their effects against potato early blight disease under greenhouse
and field conditions. Also the bacterial strains were tested in vitro to study their antifungal activity on growth of
A. solani. Both strains significantly reduced the fungal growth. Higher inhibition was obtained with Bacillus
subtilis while the lowest inhibition was with Brevibacillus brevis. Under greenhouse conditions, the highest
reduction was achieved with the fungicide (active ingredient difenoconazole) where disease severity reduced by
25% to 37.8% and disease incidence reduced by 36.3% to 42.9% compared to control. Bacillus subtilis (Bsu)
was the best biological agent with all potato varieties. Under field conditions, the highest reduction was
obtained with treatment by fungicide and potassium phosphite followed by Bacillus subtitles. Potato growth,
yield and its component significantly increased by fungicide and potassium phosphite compared to other
treatments. Also, Picasso cv. gave the highest shoot fresh weight and yield followed by Burren compared with
other cultivars. Potato plant fresh weight (g), average tuber weight (g) and potato yield (kg/plot) were highly
negative correlated with early blight disease incidence percent and disease severity in both seasons.
Keywords: Early blight, biological control, Alternaria solani, potassium phosphite, integrated control, foliar
spray, potato cultivars.
I. Introduction
Total world potato production is estimated at 364.8 million tonnes in 2012 (FAOSTAT, 2014). In
Egypt, potato crop has an important position among all vegetable crops, where about 20% of total area devoted
for vegetable production is cultivated with potato and the production of potato were 4.8 million tonnes in 2013
from an area of 178,000 hectares (FAOSTAT, 2014). This crop is economically important to Egypt and any
disturbance in its production affects severely it’s local and export impact. (Kabeil et al., 2008).
Early blight disease caused by Alternaria solani is considered a serious challenge for potato growing
(Van et al., 2001). In recent years, increase in disease severity on potato foliage has been reported in various
potato growing areas (Vloutoglou and Kalogerakis, 2000; Kapsa, 2003; Simões et al., 2003; Waals et al.,
2004; Pasche et al., 2005). Primary damage by early blight is attributed to premature defoliation of the potato
plants, resulting in tuber yield reduction. The pathogen can also attack potato tubers and produce shallow, dry,
corky rot (Folsom and Bonde, 1925; O’Brien and Rich, 1976). Also, early blight caused by Alternaria solani
is a major foliar disease attacking potato plants in most potato growing regions of the world. (Waals et al.,
2003;El-Gamal et al., 2007). So, using fungicidal chemical treatments to control potatoes early blight disease
mainly had been using in most regions of the world (Kapsa, 2004; Pasche et al., 2005; Mantecon, 2007).
The development of fungal resistance and problems of environmental pollution have accompanied
excessive reliance on fungicides. These problems can be avoided or minimized by using the natural material
products such as medicinal plant extracts (Chaudhary et al., 2003; Abd-El-Khair and Haggag, 2007), alkali
metal salts (Abd-El-Kareem, 2007; Labato et al., 2008), beneficial microorganisms (Wickramaarachchi,
2005; Terry et al., 2007) and cultivars resistance (Demir and Levent, 2002; Rodriguez et al., 2006; Kapsa,
2004).
Biological control agents who include effective bacterial species have been interesting as alternatives to
chemical agents (Fravel, 2005). Many species of Bacillus are known to suppress several pathogens belonging to
the genera (Cook and Baker, 1983; McKnight, 1993; Fiddaman and Rossall, 1994). On tomato plants,
Srinivasa et al., (2013) studied the effect of Pseudomonas isolates antagonistic activity against Alternaria
solani, to determine their capacity to inhibit fungal infection. And they found that, out of twelve Pseudomonas
isolates, five isolates viz., S4B7P (27.74), S1B8P (27.33), S2B10P (25.47), S3B3PF (23.07) and S1B1P (19.69)
which showed higher mean inhibition percentage on all the isolates of Alternaria solani. Also
Wickramaarachchi (2005) studied the effect of twenty-six exotic (including Pseudomonas fluorescens,
Azospirillum sp., P. aureofasciens [P. chlororaphis], Pseudomonas sp. and Actinomycetes [Actinomycetales])
and native rhizobacterial isolates for antagonistic activity against A. solani, and he found that, all isolates were
antagonistic to Alternaria solani.
In recent years, many scientists interested to study the relationship between the role of fertilizers either
as plant stimulator to resist or suppressor of the plant pathogens. The use of foliar fertilizers as SIR agents in
conjunction with the use of resistant varieties, improves overall control of certain diseases (Keuveni and
Reuveni, 1997). Although P fertilizer improves plant health in the majority of cases (Perrenoud, 1990). In
many cases, economic control requires periodic applications of fungicides. However, optimal fertilization can be
an important and often underappreciated component of an integrated program for disease management.
Potassium or sodium bicarbonate and Nerol showed great inhibitory effect in linear growth of
Alternaria solani. Complete inhibition was obtained with potassium or sodium bicarbonate at 2% and Nerol at
0.50 %.( Abd-El-Kareem, 2007). Phosphites (Phi) are alkali metal salts of phosphorous acid, has ability to
protect potato plants against different pathogens such as Phytophthora infestans, Fusarium solaniand and
Rhizoctonia solani (Labato, et al., 2008). Also, Keuveni and Reuveni (1998) reported that phosphates and
potassium salts effectively suppressed and controlled some diseases on various crops and they mentioned to that
foliar applied phosphite appears to be effective as a nutritional supplement and a systemic induce resistant
stimulant over a broad range of conditions.
It is cleared that, the relationship between early blight disease intensity and yield loss was highly
significant (Shtienberg et al., 1994). Some potato cultivars have resistance, while other cultivars are susceptible
(Kuczynska, 1992). So the objective of this research was to evaluate the effects of some bacterial strains as
biological control agents in vitro inhibition of Alturnaria solani in laboratory assays and determine the effect of
foliar spray of some chemical, metal salts of potassium phosphite and Cupper as mineral components with most
effective bacterial isolates on early blight disease development and suppression, yield and its components of
some potato cultivars under field conditions.
Chemical compounds:
- Potafore ―a commercial compound containing 42% potassium and 38 % phosphorus as potassium phosphites
(kPhi)‖ and sprayed by 2 ml/1L water.
- Oxy plus ―a copper compound contain copper oxychloride by 47.89%‖ and sprayed by 2.5 gm/1L water.
- Score ―a fungicide contained difenoconazole and used by 0.5 ml / 1L water.
Greenhouse experiment:
The experiment was carried out in the greenhouse of plant protection department, Desert Research
Center, Egypt. Potato tubers cvs. Burren, Diamond, Picasso and Spunta were grown in plastic pots (50 cm
diameter) containing sandy loam soil at 22–25°C and RH 75–80%. Five plants/pot and three pots for each
treatment were used. Plant inoculation was carried out with 30 ml of fungus suspension when plants had 4–5
leaves. After inoculation, pots kept covered under plastic sheet for two days and treated with 90 ml from
bacterial strain with concentration of bacterial cells (108CFU/ml.) for each isolate. while the concentration of
other compounds were (2 ml/L, 2.5 gm/L and 0.5 ml/L) for Potafore, Oxy plus and Score respectively.
Inoculated potato plants treated with water were used as control. Disease incidence and severity were rated
based on percentage of damaged potato leaf area and affected number of plants.
disease symptoms in relation to the whole number of potato plants. The average of records of the surveyed
replicates for each particular treatment was calculated. Disease severity and incidence were estimated as
follows; 0 = no leaf lesion; 1= lesions on < 25% of leaf area; 2 = lesion on 26–50% of leaf area; 3 = lesion on
51–75% of leaf area and 4 = lesions on 76 up to 100% of leaf area according to the scale from 0 to 4 suggested
by Cohen et al., (1991) then the traits calculated using the following formula:
∑ (n×c)
D.S = ________
N
Where; D.S. = intensity of attack, n= number of infected plants per category, c = category number and N = total
examined plants.
Statistical analysis:
Data were subjected to statistical analysis by M-STAT C (Russel, 1991). The differences among means were
performed using least significant difference (LSD) at 5% level.
Four bacterial strains were used to study their inhibitory effect on growth of Alternaria solani in vitro.
Results indicated that both treatments reduced the linear growth of Alternaria solani. Higher inhibition was
obtained with Bacillus subtilis in all cases of tested fungal isolates while the lowest inhibition rate with
Brevibacillus brevis. The most affected pathogenic isolates was As2 followed by As1 in case of Bacillus
subtilis which reduced the linear growth by 65.67% and 62.5 % respectively. On the other hand, the As1 was
most resistant under stress of Brevibacillus brevis where recorded 25.5% inhibition rate (Fig 1). These results
are in agreement with (Edwards et al., 1994; Fravel, 2005; Sallam and Abo-Elyousr, 2012; Stepanović et al.,
2015 ). As preliminary results of screening for antagonism in petri plates assay, all tested bacterial isolates were
selected to evaluate their antifungal effects in further experiments in compared to the effect of fungicide (with
active ingredient Difenoconazole, potassium phosphite (kphi) and Cupper (cu).
Fig. 1: Linear growth of Alternaria solani as affected with bacterial isolates in vitro
Influence of foliar spray treatments on early blight diseases of potato under greenhouse conditions:
Table (2): Evaluation of biological and chemical control agents against Alternaria solani under
greenhouse conditions.
Burren Diamond Picasso Spunta X¯
Treatments DI DS DI DS DI DS DI DS DI DS
Bbr 66.7 3.3 73.3 3.7 73.3 3.7 73.3 3.7 71.7 3.6
Ppu 66.7 3.3 73.3 3.7 66.7 3.3 73.3 3.7 70.0 3.5
Pae 60.0 3.0 80.0 4.0 73.3 3.7 80.0 4.0 73.3 3.7
Bsu 53.3 2.7 66.7 3.3 53.3 2.7 60.0 3.0 58.3 2.9
(Kphi) 66.7 3.3 53.3 2.7 60.0 3.0 66.7 3.7 61.7 3.2
Cu 60.0 3.0 60.0 3.0 60.0 3.0 66.7 3.3 61.7 3.1
Score 46.7 2.3 53.3 2.7 53.3 2.7 60.0 3.0 53.3 2.7
Control 73.3 3.7 86.7 4.0 93.3 4.0 86.7 4.0 85.0 3.9
X¯ 61.7 3.1 68.3 3.4 66.7 3.3 70.8 3.5
LSD at 5%
Characters Cultivars Foliar spray Interaction
Dis. Inci. 7.4 8.0 16.0
Dis. Sev. 0.3 0.4 0.7
Potato cultivars response towards Alternaria solani infection and foliar spray under field conditions:
The efficacy of four bacterial isolates and chemical components on disease incidence and severity
under field conditions are shown in Tables (3 and 4). Results revealed that all cultivars have deferent susceptible
to early blight disease incidence and severity recorded during two seasons. Burren cultivar exhibit less
susceptibility to early blight according to disease incidence and severity compared with other cultivars.
On the other hand all foliar spray treatments gave significant results with Burren cultivar in both
seasons. Picasso cultivar seems to be moderate susceptible in both seasons (54.3% and 44.8%) (3.3 and 3.0) for
disease incidence and severity in first and second seasons respectively. Cultivars Diamond and Spunta showed
more susceptibility to early blight in both seasons. Diamond seems to be more susceptible than Spunta in first
season (63.8% and 62.9%) (4 and 3.7) for disease incidence and severity with control treatment. In the same
trend, Spunta showed more susceptible for disease incidence in second season than Diamond especially with
control where recorded (52.4% and 48.6%) for both cultivars.
Concerning foliar spray, all foliar spray treatments gave significantly decreased disease incidence and
disease severity compared with control treatment in both seasons.
Bacterial isolates Brevibacillus brevis (Bbr) Pseudomonas putida (Ppu), Pseudomonas aerogenosa
(Pae) and Bacillus subtilis (Bsu) gave significant results cambered to control. While fungicide (Score),
Potassium phosphite (kphi) and copper (cu) gave the highest significant reduction in disease incidence and
severity compared with bacterial isolates and control treatments. (Bsu) was more effective in decreasing the
disease incidence and severity than other isolates with all cultivars through two seasons where, recorded (31.7
and 26.7) and (2.7 and 1.8) of disease incidence and severity in first and second seasons, respectively. Treated
potato plants with Potassium phosphite (kphi) and Copper (Cu) gave superior results for disease incidence and
severity compared with bacterial isolates and control (Tables 3 and 4). The highly decreasing in disease
incidence and severity obtained with Score treatment compared with other treatments. These results are
agreement with (Kapsa and Osowski, 2003; Kapsa, 2004; Pasche et al., 2005; Mantecon, 2007).
Table (3): Effect of cultivars and foliar spray treatments and their interactions on potato disease
incidence during two successive growing seasons (2014 and 2015).
Burren Diamond Picasso Spunta X¯
Treatments 1St S* 2nd S** 1St S 2nd S 1St S 2nd S 1St S 2nd S 1St S 2nd S
Bbr 35.2 38.1 44.8 40.0 42.9 41.0 46.7 42.9 42.4 40.5
Ppu 34.3 35.2 42.9 40.0 41.0 39.0 43.8 44.8 40.5 39.8
Pae 31.4 32.4 41.0 41.9 42.9 41.9 42.9 41.9 39.5 39.5
Bsu 21.0 21.0 35.2 31.4 32.4 23.8 38.1 30.5 31.7 26.7
(Kphi) 19.0 21.0 32.4 30.5 21.0 21.0 34.3 28.6 26.7 25.2
Cu 21.9 22.9 28.6 26.7 26.7 21.0 29.5 31.4 26.7 25.5
Score 10.5 5.7 20.0 18.1 16.2 11.4 19.0 15.2 16.4 12.6
Control 43.8 41.9 63.8 48.6 54.3 44.8 62.9 52.4 56.2 46.9
X¯ 27.1 27.3 38.6 34.6 34.6 30.5 39.6 36.0
LSD at 5%
Cultivars Foliar spray Interaction
1St S 1.8 1.9 3.8
2nd S 2.2 3.0 5.9
*, ** Means the first (1st S) and second (2nd S) growing seasons
Table (4): Effect of cultivars and foliar spray treatments and their interactions on potato disease severity
during two successive growing seasons (2014 and 2015).
Burren Diamond Picasso Spunta X¯
Treatments 1St S* 2nd S** 1St S 2nd S 1St S 2nd S 1St S 2nd S 1St S 2nd S
Bbr 2.3 1.7 3.7 1.7 2.7 2.3 3.3 2.7 3.0 2.1
Ppu 2.0 2.0 3.7 2.7 2.3 2.3 2.7 3.0 2.7 2.5
Pae 2.3 2.3 4.0 3.0 3.0 2.7 3.3 2.7 3.2 2.7
Bsu 1.7 1.3 3.3 1.7 2.3 1.7 3.3 2.3 2.7 1.8
(Kphi) 1.7 1.7 3.0 2.3 2.7 1.7 3.7 2.3 2.8 2.0
Cu 1.7 1.3 3.0 2.0 2.3 1.3 3.0 2.0 2.5 1.7
Score 1.3 1.0 2.3 1.7 1.7 1.0 2.3 1.3 1.9 1.3
Control 2.7 2.7 4.0 3.3 3.3 3.0 3.7 3.0 3.4 3.0
X¯ 2.0 1.8 3.4 2.3 2.5 2.0 3.2 2.4
LSD at 5%
Cultivars Foliar spray Interaction
1St S 0.6 0.4 0.9
2nd S 0.2 0.4 0.9
*, ** Means the first (1st S) and second (2nd S) growing seasons. Early Blight Disease Severity Recorded
according to the Scale 0-4;
Efficacy evaluating of foliar spray application of bacterial biocontrol and chemical control agents on
early blight disease under Field condition:
To evaluating the efficacy of treatments on tested potato cultivars vegetative growth, data presented in
(Table 5) showed that potato shoot length, shoot fresh weight, leaf number and leaf chlorophyll content
significantly affected by potato cultivars and foliar spray treatments in both seasons except the effect of cultivars
in the second season. Moreover, interaction effects were not significant except their effect on shoot fresh weight
in both seasons. Picasso cv produced the highest shoot length and highest shoot weight in both seasons
compared with other cultivars, followed by Diamond for shoot length, Burren and Spunta for shoot fresh weight
in both seasons. The lowest shoot length was obtained by cvs Burren and Spunta, while cv Diamond produced
the lowest shoot fresh weight in both seasons. Burren and Diamond cultivars gave the highest leaf number
compared with cv Spunta in both seasons, while the highest leaf chlorophyll content was obtained by cv Burren
compared with other cultivars in both seasons.
Concerning foliar spray effects, data in (Table 5) showed that Score treatment (fungicide) significantly
increased shoot length, shoot fresh weight and leaf number compared with other treatments, followed by
potassium phosphite (kphi) then )Bsu( bacterial strain. While control treatment produced the lowest values
followed by other bacterial strains and Cupper treatments in both seasons. Highest leaf chlorophyll content was
obtained with potassium phosphite, Score and Cupper treatments compared with control and bacterial strains
treatments in both seasons. Picasso cultivar treated with Score gave the highest shoot fresh weight, while other
cultivars with control treatment gave the lowest value in both seasons. Similar results were obtained by
(Kuczynska, 1992; Keuveni and Reuvcni, l997; Keuveni and Reuvcni, 1998).
DOI: 10.9790/2380-09114858 www.iosrjournals.org 53 | Page
Effect of bacterial isolates and phosphite compounds on disease incidence of early blight ....
Table (5) Effect of cultivars, foliar spray treatments and their interactions on potato shoot length,
fresh weight, leaves number and leaves chlorophyll content in two seasons.
characters Shoot length (cm) Shoot fresh weight (g) Leaves number chlorophyll (SPAD)
Seasons St nd St nd St nd
1 S 2 S 1 S 2 S 1 S 2 S 1St S 2nd S
Cultivars
Burren 58.08 60.38 304.31 266.40 21.35 17.91 46.96 52.28
Diamond 64.71 67.29 243.15 243.15 20.98 18.53 43.68 49.75
Picasso 70.84 73.87 380.62 380.62 20.10 17.40 44.24 50.10
Spunta 57.90 60.54 301.88 301.88 18.89 16.03 44.91 50.31
LSD at 0.05 2.08 1.60 20.31 17.22 1.47 0.93 1.68 NS
Foliar spray
Bbr 61.24 64.26 291.12 281.56 18.56 15.57 44.17 50.15
Ppu 60.57 62.37 286.73 279.18 19.08 16.09 43.66 49.56
Pae 61.48 63.61 292.89 283.32 19.75 16.68 43.47 49.12
Bsu 61.98 65.42 309.18 303.68 20.55 17.64 44.21 50.69
(KPhi) 67.31 69.86 360.58 352.59 21.88 19.64 47.49 53.14
Cu 60.33 62.21 286.08 276.43 20.33 17.34 46.30 50.86
Score 71.07 75.29 401.65 383.66 23.90 20.41 46.92 52.58
Control 59.08 61.13 231.70 223.69 18.61 16.37 43.36 48.76
LSD at 0.05 2.34 2.39 13.57 14.43 1.46 1.23 1.96 1.67
Interaction
Bbr 55.74 58.88 307.02 268.77 20.21 16.89 46.18 52.25
Ppu 55.09 56.89 302.00 271.80 20.58 17.26 45.80 51.87
Pae 56.34 58.16 309.27 270.97 20.86 17.54 44.67 50.07
Burren
After confirming the effectiveness of treatments in reducing the disease incidence and severity of
potato late blight, the component of yield were investigated, data presented in (Table 6) showed that potato yield
per plot, tuber number, average tuber weight and tuber dry matter percent significantly affected by tested potato
cultivars and foliar spray application in both seasons. Only tuber number per plot in the second season was not
significant. Moreover, all interaction effects (Table 7) were not significant except total yield per plot in both
seasons and tuber number per plot in the first season. Picasso cultivar gave the highest potato yield, followed by
cv Burren compared with cvs Spunta and Diamond which gave the lowest yield in both seasons.
Picasso cultivar produced the highest tuber number per plot followed by Diamond in the first season
compared with cv Spunta which produced the lowest tuber number per plot. On the other hand, cvs Spunta,
Burren and Picasso in the first season, Spunta and Picasso in the second season produced the highest tuber
weight compared with cv Diamond which gave the lowest value in this respect. Regarding dry matter percent,
cvs Picasso and Diamond gave the highest percent compared with cvs Spunta and Burren in both seasons.
Concerning of foliar spray treatments, Score treatment significantly increased potato yield, tuber
weight and tuber dry matter percent followed by potassium phosphite then (Bsu) bacterial strain compared with
other treatments. Picasso cultivar treated with Score gave the highest potato yield compared with cv Diamond
treated with Cupper, bacterial strains and control treatments in both seasons.
Table (6) Effect of cultivars and foliar spray treatments on potato yield (kg/plot), tubers number per plot,
average tuber weight (g) and dry matter % in both of two growing seasons.
Potato yield (kg/plot) Tubers number/plot Average tuber weight (g) Dry matter %
Cultivars
1St S* 2nd S** 1St S 2nd S 1St S 2nd S 1St S 2nd S
Burren 29.88 25.92 285.1 270.5 104.90 96.39 18.82 16.87
Diamond 26.50 22.54 295.4 279.1 89.58 81.50 22.11 19.51
Picasso 34.80 30.92 333.9 288.60 104.35 108.50 22.78 19.34
Spunta 28.09 24.87 261.8 245.4 106.82 101.22 20.72 18.08
LSD at 0.05 3.57 2.75 43.1 NS 2.87 9.94 0.97 0.72
Foliar spray
Bbr 28.39 24.17 287.76 270.40 98.67 89.83 20.39 17.56
Ppu 28.18 23.63 287.32 270.58 98.53 88.49 20.66 17.87
Pae 28.44 23.89 287.74 269.31 98.94 89.05 20.59 18.07
Bsu 30.01 27.13 298.54 278.95 100.41 97.69 21.34 18.40
(KPhi) 34.78 30.82 323.81 283.23 107.76 109.32 21.94 19.61
Cu 27.68 23.55 278.56 256.89 99.39 92.13 20.94 18.15
Score 36.40 32.60 333.64 287.50 109.69 115.00 22.08 19.58
Control 24.67 22.70 254.93 250.32 97.91 93.27 20.90 18.38
LSD at 0.05 1.25 1.37 19.1 NS 4.00 8.16 0.81 0.54
*, ** Means the first (1St S) and second (2nd S) growing seasons.
Relationship between early blight disease control and yield components of tested potato cultivars:
Based on the obtained results, it may be worth to mention that potato plant fresh weight (g), average
tuber weight (g) and potato yield (kg/plot) were highly negative correlated with early blight disease incidence
percent in both seasons, fig.(1). A linear correlation coefficients (r) were (-0.599, -0.540), (-0.487, -0.570) and (-
0.593, -0.636) for plant fresh weight, average tuber weight and potato yield in the first and second seasons,
respectively. The corresponding coefficient of determination (r 2) was (0.359, 0.292), (0.337, 0.327) and (0.352,
0.404), which indicated that (35.9%, 29.2%), (23.7%, 32.7%) and (35.2%, 40.4%) of the variation in plant fresh
weight, average tuber weight and potato yield were related to early blight disease incidence percent in the first
and second seasons, respectively. On the other hand regression coefficients were (-3.38, -3.43), (-0.31, 0.71) and
(-0.25, -0.28) for plant fresh weight (g), average tuber weight (g) and potato yield (kg/plot) in the first and
second seasons, respectively. This indicated that when early blight disease incidence increased by one percent,
plant fresh weight, average tuber weight and potato yield decreased by (3.38g, 3.43 g), (0.31g, 0.71g) and (0.25
kg, 0.28 kg) in the first and second season, respectively fig (2).
Moreover, the same characters were highly negative controlled with early blight disease severity in
both seasons fig (2). Whereas, a linear correlation coefficients (r) were (-0.586, -0.449), (-0.573, -0.457) and (-
0.561, -0.523) for plant fresh weight (g), average tuber weight (g) and potato tuber yield (kg/plot) in the first and
second seasons, respectively. The corresponding coefficients determination (r 2) were (0.343, 0.201), (0.328,
0.209) and (0.315, 0.273) which indicated that (34.3, 20.1), (32.8, 20.9) and (31.5, 27.3) of the variation in plant
fresh weight, average tuber weight and potato yield were related to early blight disease severity in the first and
second seasons, respectively.
Table (7): The interactions between cultivars and foliar spray treatments on potato yield (kg/plot), tubers
number per plot and average tuber weight (g) of two seasons
Potato yield (kg/plot) Tubers number/plot Average tuber weight (g) Dry matter %
Characters/
seasons
1St S* 2nd S** 1St S 2nd S 1St S 2nd S 1St S 2nd S
Cultivars/
treatments
Bbr 29.33 24.78 285.80 274.51 102.34 89.86 18.22 15.58
Ppu 29.28 24.73 288.56 279.64 102.13 89.83 18.44 16.45
Pae 29.12 24.57 285.39 274.81 102.54 90.37 18.47 16.55
Burren
The regression coefficients were (-57.29, -50.87), (-6.39, -9.99) and (-4.01, -4.06) for plant fresh
weight, average tuber weight and potato yield which indicated that when early blight disease severity increased
by one grade on scale, plant fresh weight , average tuber weight and potato tuber yield decreased by
(57.29g,50.87g), (6.39g, 9.99g) and (4.01kg, 4.06kg) in the first and second seasons, respectively fig (2). Such
decrement of potato yield /plot due mainly to average of tuber weight which in turn, decreased when plant fresh
weight especially leaves (assimilative plant organs) were significantly affected by early blight disease
incidence and severity. Similar results were found by (Folsom and Bonde, 1925; O’Brien and Rich, 1976;
Vloutoglou and Kalogerakis, 2000; Simoes et al., 2003; Waals et al., 2004; Pasche et al., 2005; El-Gamal et
al., 2007; Amitava and Devi, 2014) where they reported that primary damage by early blight is attributed to
premature defoliation of the potato plants, resulting in tuber yield reduction.
IV. Conclusion
The results of this study showed that the tested biological, chemical and fertilizing factors exhibited
different levels of antifungal activities on A. solani isolates under laboratory, greenhouse and field conditions.
The highest reduction was achieved with the Score fungicide (active ingredient Difenoconazole), and Bacillus
subtilis was the most effective bacterial isolates under vitro and vivo conditions. There is a relation between
yield production and rate of disease infection either severity or incidence, and the treatments were effective in
reduce of infection rate and increase of potato yield, so we conclude that, using of Bacillus subtilis as biocontrol
agents and with integrated management program with potassium phosphite or fungicide may be useful in
controlling potato early blight disease under field conditions.
Fig.(2) Regression lines, coefficients of determination (r2) and regression coefficients (b) for plant fresh
weight (g/plant), total yield(kg/plot) and average tuber weight (g) of potato vs. early blight (A)
disease incidence % and (B) disease severity for 2014 and 2015 seasons.
Acknowledgements:
The authors would like to thank Associate Prof. Amal M. Omar, Microbiology Unit, Soil Fertilization
and Microbiology Dept. Desert Research Center, Egypt, for providing the bacterial isolates which used in this
research work.
References
[1]. Abd-El-Kareem,F. (2007) Potassium or Sodium Bicarbonate in Combination with Nerol for Controlling Early Blight Disease of
Potato Plants under Laboratory, Greenhouse and Field Conditions. Egypt. J. Phytopathol., 35(1) 73-86.
[2]. Abd-El-Khair, H. and Wafaa, M. Haggag (2007) Application of Some Egyptian Medicinal Plant Extracts Against Potato Late
and Early Blights. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 3(3): 166-175.
[3]. Alabouvette, C., P. Lemanceau and C. Stein-berg (1993). Recent advances in the bio-logical control of Fusarium wilts. Pesticide
Science 37, 365—373.
[4]. Chaudhary, R. F. Patel, R. L. Chaudhari, S. M. (2003). In vitro evaluation of different plant extracts against Alternaria
alternata causing early blight of potato. Journal of the Indian Potato Association; 2003. 30 (1/2):141-142. 5 ref. AN: 20033204686.
[5]. Cohen Y., Gisi U., Mosinger E. (1991). Systemic resistance of potato plants against Phytophthora infestans induced by
unsaturated fatty acids. Physiol. Mol. Pl. Pathol. 38: 255–263.
[6]. Cook, R. J. & Baker, K. F. (1983). The nature and practice of biological control of plant pathogens, American Phytopathological
Society.
[7]. Coskuntuna, A. and N. Özer (2008). Biological control of onion basal rot disease using Trichoderma harzianum and induction of
antifungal compounds in onion set following seed treatment. Crop Protection, 27: 330 – 336.
[8]. Demir, S. And R. Levent, (2002). Reactions of different potato cultivais against to early blight disease. Journal of Turkish
Phytopathology; 31(2):97-103.AN: 20073193875
[9]. El-Gamal, Nadia G.; Abd-El-Kareem, F.; Fotouh, Y. O. and El- Mougy, Nehal S (2007). Induction of systemic resistance in
potato plants against late and early blight diseases using chemical inducers under greenhouse and field conditions. Res. J. Agric. &
Biol.Sci., 3(2): 73-81.
[10]. FAOSTAT (2014): Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. STATISTICS DIVISION,
http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/Q/QC/E
[11]. Fiddaman, P. and Rossall, S. (1994). Effect of substrate on the production of antifungal volatiles from Bacillus subtilis. Journal of
applied microbiology 76(4): 395-405.
[12]. Folsom D, Bonde R (1925). Alternaria solani as a cause of tuber rot in potatoes. Phytopathology 15: 282-286.
[13]. Fravel, D. R. (2005). Commercialization and implementation of biocontrol1. Annual Review of Phytopathology 43(1): 337-359.
[14]. Kabeil, S.S.;M.A. Amer,; S.M. Matarand and M.H. El-Masryy (2008). In planta Biological Control of Potato Brown Rot
Disease in Egypt. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 4 (S): 803-810.
[15]. Kapsa, J (2004). Early blight (Alternaria spp.) in potato crops in Poland and results of chemical protection. Journal of Plant
Protection Research;. 44(3):231-238. 8 ref. AN: 20063079104
[16]. Kapsa, J. (2003). Usefulness of fungicides with various modes of actions in the protection of potato crops. Journal of Plant
Protection Research; 2003. 43(2):191-198. 12 ref. AN: 20033183616
[17]. Keuveni, M., Agapov. V. and Reuvcni, R. (l997). A foliar spray of micronutricnt solutions induces local and systemic protection
against powdery mildew (Spaerothcwr firlipirrcw) in cucumber plants. Eur. J. Plant Pathology, 103: 581-588.
[18]. Keuveni, M.. Agapov. V. and Reuvcni, R. (l998). Foliar-fertilizer therapy-a concept in integrated pest management. Plant
Protection, 17 (2):111-118.
[19]. Kuczynska, J.(1992). The influence of some factors on the incidence and harmfulness of early blight on potatoes. Biuletyn
Instytutu Ziemniaka; 1992. (41):73-87. 19 ref.AN: 19952308355
[20]. Lobato,M.C.;F.P.Oliviera;E.A.Gomzalez;E.A.Wolski;G.R.Daleo;D.O.Caldiz and A.B.Andreu (2008) Phosphite compounds
reduce disease severity in potato seed tubers and foliage. Eur. J. plant pathol ,(122) 349-358.
[21]. Mantecon, J. D. (2007). Potato yield increases due to fungicide treatment in Argentinian early blight (Alternaria solani) and late
blight (Phytophthora infestans) field trials during the 1996-2005 seasons. Plant Health Progress; 2007. (February):1-6. 16 ref. AN:
20073056767
[22]. McKnight, S. E. (1993). Effects of Bacillus subtilis on cotton seedling development, Nottingham Univ. (United Kingdom).
[23]. Meenakshi S, Sukhada Mohandas, Riaz Mahmood (2014). Comparison of Detached Leaf Evaluations in Different Age of
Transgenic Tomato Expressing Antimicrobial Peptide Gene (Ace-AMP1) Resistant to Early Blight Disease Caused By Alternaria
solani. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology. 3 (9): 162763-16276.
[24]. O’Brien MJ, Rich AE (1976). Potato diseases. USDA Agricultural Hand Book, pp. 474.
[25]. Omar, Amal M and Ahmed I.S. Ahmed (2014). Antagonistic and inhibitory effect of some plant rhizo-bacteria against different
Fusarium isolates on Salvia officinalis. American-Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci., 14 (12): 1437-1446
[26]. Pasche, J.S.; Piche, L.M. and Gudmestad, N.C. (2005). Effect of the F129L Mutation in Alternaria solani on fungicides affecting
mitochondrial respiration. Plant Dis., 89:269-278.
[27]. Perrenoud, S. (l990). Potussium and plant health, 2nd cd. International Potash Institute, Bern, Switzerland (IPI Research Topics
No. 3).
[28]. Rodriguez, M. A. D. Brommonschenkel, S. H. Matsuoka, K. Mizubuti, E. S. G. (2006). Components of resistance to early
blight in four potato cultivars: effect of leaf position. Journal of Phytopathology; 2006. 154(4):230-235. 41 ref. AN: 20063095962
[29]. Russell, D. F., (1991). In ― MSTATC, Directory crop soil science Department‖ Michigan Universty.USA.
[30]. Shtienberg, D. Blachinski, D. Yaniv, A. Dinoor, A. (1994). Control of potato early blight in the northern Negev region of Israel
in the fall season. [Hebrew] Hassadeh; 1994. 74(4):393-397, 473. 5 ref. AN: 19951000303
[31]. Simões C.M.O., Schenkel E.P., Gosmann G., Mello J.C.P., Mentz L.A., Petrovick P.R. (2003). Farmacognosia da Planta ao
Medicamento. 5th ed. UFRGS/UFSC: Porto Alegre/Florianópolis.
[32]. Srinivasa, N. Rymbai, H. Rajesh, A. M. Ganeshamoorthi, P. Ramanujam, B. Yathish, K. R. (2013). Morphological and
biochemical characterization of antagonist Pseudomonas isolates. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences; 2013. 9(1):14-23.
28 ref.AN: 20133276878
[33]. Terry, E. Leyva, A. Ruiz, J. Diaz, M. M. (2007). Management of bioproducts for the ecological production of tomato (Solanum
lycopersicon, L.). Cultivos Tropicales; 2007. 28(3):23-27. (c.f. CAP Abst.)AN: 20093324307
[34]. Van der Waals, J.E., L. Korsten, and T.A.S. Aveling (2001). A review of early blight of potato. Afr. Plant Protect. 7: 91-102.
[35]. Vloutoglou I, Kalogerakis SN (2000). Effects of inoculum concentration, wetness duration and plant age on development of early
blight (Alternaria solani) and on shedding of leaves in tomato plants. Plant Pathol. 49:339-345.
[36]. Waals J.E., Korsten L., Slippers B. (2004). Genetic diversity among Alternaria solani isolates from potatoes in South Africa.
Plant Dis. 88: 959–964.
[37]. Waals, J. E. van der Denner, F. D. N. Rij, N. van Korsten, L. (2003). Evaluation of PLANT-Plus, a decision support system for
control of early blight on potatoes in South Africa. Crop Protection; 2003. 22(6):821-828. 36 ref.AN: 20033123512
[38]. Wickramaarachchi, W. A. R. T. (2005) The effect of rhizobacteria on increasing plant growth and inducing systemic resistance in
tomato against early blight disease. Annals of the Sri Lanka Department of Agriculture; 2005. 7:309-325. 35 ref. AN: 20083004904