LíneAceroEC

Phone: 0996599096

Simulation of (C3D)
Estructura para
Análisis
Date: viernes, 12 de noviembre de 2021
Designer: Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
Study name: Estructura – Cruceta Hexagonal
Analysis type: Static

Table of Contents
Description ............................................ 1
Assumptions .......................................... 2
Model Information ................................... 2
Study Properties ..................................... 6
Units ................................................... 6
Description Material Properties .................................. 7
Cruceta Hexagonal para Reflector Loads and Fixtures................................... 8
Connector Definitions ............................... 8
Contact Information ................................. 9
Mesh information .................................... 9
Sensor Details ...................................... 10
Resultant Forces ................................... 10
Beams ................................................ 11
Study Results ....................................... 14
Conclusion .......................................... 37

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 1

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

Assumptions

Model Information

Model name: (C3D) Estructura para Análisis

Current Configuration: Default<As Machined>
Beam Bodies:
Document Name and Document Path/Date
Formulation Properties
Reference Modified
Section Standard-iso/Tube
Beam-1(Tube (square) 50 X
(square)/50 x 50 x 1.5
50 X 1.5(2)[2])
Section Area: J:\JORGE
0.000281343m^2 CARRERA\Análisis Estático
Length:971.132mm Ing. Santiago Vaca\(C3D)
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:0.000273215m^3 Estructura para
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 Análisis.SLDPRT
Mass:2.14474kg Nov 12 18:11:36 2021
Weight:21.0185N

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 2

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

Section Standard-iso/L Angle

Beam-2(Trim/Extend8) (equal)/45x45x4
Section Area: J:\JORGE
0.000347648m^2 CARRERA\Análisis Estático
Length:1631.96mm Ing. Santiago Vaca\(C3D)
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:0.000567348m^3 Estructura para
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 Análisis.SLDPRT
Mass:4.45368kg Nov 12 18:11:36 2021
Weight:43.6461N

Section Standard-iso/Tube
Beam-3(Tube (square) 50 X
(square)/50 x 50 x 1.5
50 X 1.5(2)[3])
Section Area: J:\JORGE
0.000281343m^2 CARRERA\Análisis Estático
Length:971.132mm Ing. Santiago Vaca\(C3D)
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:0.000273218m^3 Estructura para
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 Análisis.SLDPRT
Mass:2.14476kg Nov 12 18:11:36 2021
Weight:21.0187N

Section Standard-iso/L Angle

Beam-4(Trim/Extend12) (equal)/45x45x4
Section Area: J:\JORGE
0.000347648m^2 CARRERA\Análisis Estático
Length:1634.97mm Ing. Santiago Vaca\(C3D)
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:0.000568397m^3 Estructura para
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 Análisis.SLDPRT
Mass:4.46191kg Nov 12 18:11:36 2021
Weight:43.7268N

Section Standard-iso/Tube
Beam-5(Tube (square) 50 X
(square)/50 x 50 x 1.5
50 X 1.5(2)[1])
Section Area: J:\JORGE
0.000281343m^2 CARRERA\Análisis Estático
Length:971.132mm Ing. Santiago Vaca\(C3D)
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:0.000273215m^3 Estructura para
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 Análisis.SLDPRT
Mass:2.14474kg Nov 12 18:11:36 2021
Weight:21.0185N

Section Standard-
Beam-6(Trim/Extend9)
Section Area:
J:\JORGE
0.000347648m^2
CARRERA\Análisis Estático
Length:1629.52mm
Ing. Santiago Vaca\(C3D)
Beam – Uniform C/S Volume:0.000566455m^3
Estructura para
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3
Análisis.SLDPRT
Mass:4.44667kg
Nov 12 18:11:36 2021
Weight:43.5774N

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 3

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

Section Standard-iso/Tube
Beam-7(Tube (square) 50 X
(square)/50 x 50 x 1.5
50 X 1.5(2)[4])
Section Area: J:\JORGE
0.000281343m^2 CARRERA\Análisis Estático
Length:971.132mm Ing. Santiago Vaca\(C3D)
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:0.000273215m^3 Estructura para
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 Análisis.SLDPRT
Mass:2.14474kg Nov 12 18:11:36 2021
Weight:21.0185N

Section Standard-iso/L Angle

Beam-8(Trim/Extend7) (equal)/45x45x4
Section Area: J:\JORGE
0.000347648m^2 CARRERA\Análisis Estático
Length:784.149mm Ing. Santiago Vaca\(C3D)
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:0.000272612m^3 Estructura para
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 Análisis.SLDPRT
Mass:2.14001kg Nov 12 18:11:36 2021
Weight:20.9721N

Section Standard-iso/Tube
Beam-9(Tube (square) 50 X
(square)/50 x 50 x 1.5
50 X 1.5(2)[6])
Section Area: J:\JORGE
0.000281343m^2 CARRERA\Análisis Estático
Length:971.132mm Ing. Santiago Vaca\(C3D)
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:0.000273218m^3 Estructura para
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 Análisis.SLDPRT
Mass:2.14476kg Nov 12 18:11:36 2021
Weight:21.0187N

Section Standard-iso/L Angle

Beam-10(Trim/Extend11) (equal)/45x45x4
Section Area: J:\JORGE
0.000347648m^2 CARRERA\Análisis Estático
Length:861.289mm Ing. Santiago Vaca\(C3D)
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:0.000299427m^3 Estructura para
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 Análisis.SLDPRT
Mass:2.3505kg Nov 12 18:11:36 2021
Weight:23.0349N

Section Standard-iso/L Angle

Beam-11(Trim/Extend4) (equal)/45x45x4
Section Area: J:\JORGE
0.000347648m^2 CARRERA\Análisis Estático
Length:784.149mm Ing. Santiago Vaca\(C3D)
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:0.000272612m^3 Estructura para
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 Análisis.SLDPRT
Mass:2.14001kg Nov 12 18:11:36 2021
Weight:20.9721N

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 4

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

Section Standard-iso/L Angle

Beam-12(Trim/Extend5) (equal)/45x45x4
Section Area: J:\JORGE
0.000347648m^2 CARRERA\Análisis Estático
Length:1620.74mm Ing. Santiago Vaca\(C3D)
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:0.000563442m^3 Estructura para
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 Análisis.SLDPRT
Mass:4.42302kg Nov 12 18:11:36 2021
Weight:43.3456N

Section Standard-iso/L Angle

Beam-13(Trim/Extend10) (equal)/45x45x4
Section Area: J:\JORGE
0.000347648m^2 CARRERA\Análisis Estático
Length:877.654mm Ing. Santiago Vaca\(C3D)
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:0.000305087m^3 Estructura para
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 Análisis.SLDPRT
Mass:2.39493kg Nov 12 18:11:36 2021
Weight:23.4703N

Section Standard-iso/Tube
Beam-14(Tube (square) 50
(square)/50 x 50 x 1.5
X 50 X 1.5(2)[5])
Section Area: J:\JORGE
0.000281343m^2 CARRERA\Análisis Estático
Length:971.132mm Ing. Santiago Vaca\(C3D)
Beam – Uniform C/S
Volume:0.000273215m^3 Estructura para
Mass Density:7850kg/m^3 Análisis.SLDPRT
Mass:2.14474kg Nov 12 18:11:36 2021
Weight:21.0185N

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 5

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

Study Properties
Study name Estructura – Cruceta Hexagonal
Analysis type Static
Mesh type Beam Mesh
Solver type Direct sparse solver
Inplane Effect: Off
Soft Spring: Off
Inertial Relief: Off
Incompatible bonding options Automatic
Large displacement Off
Compute free body forces On
Result folder SOLIDWORKS document (J:\JORGE
CARRERA\Análisis Estático Ing. Santiago Vaca)

Units
Unit system: SI (MKS)
Length/Displacement mm
Temperature Celsius
Angular velocity Rad/sec
Pressure/Stress N/mm^2 (Mpa)

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 6

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

Material Properties
Model Reference Properties Components
Name: ASTM A36 Steel SolidBody 1(Tube (square) 50
Model type: Linear Elastic Isotropic X 50 X 1.5(2)[2])((C3D)
Default failure Unknown Estructura para Análisis),
criterion: SolidBody
Yield strength: 250 N/mm^2 2(Trim/Extend8)((C3D)
Tensile strength: 400 N/mm^2 Estructura para Análisis),
Elastic modulus: 200000 N/mm^2 SolidBody 3(Tube (square) 50
Poisson’s ratio: 0.26 X 50 X 1.5(2)[3])((C3D)
Mass density: 7.85 g/cm^3 Estructura para Análisis),
Shear modulus: 79300 N/mm^2 SolidBody
4(Trim/Extend12)((C3D)
Estructura para Análisis),
SolidBody 5(Tube (square) 50
X 50 X 1.5(2)[1])((C3D)
Estructura para Análisis),
SolidBody
6(Trim/Extend9)((C3D)
Estructura para Análisis),
SolidBody 7(Tube (square) 50
X 50 X 1.5(2)[4])((C3D)
Estructura para Análisis),
SolidBody
8(Trim/Extend7)((C3D)
Estructura para Análisis),
SolidBody 9(Tube (square) 50
X 50 X 1.5(2)[6])((C3D)
Estructura para Análisis),
SolidBody
10(Trim/Extend11)((C3D)
Estructura para Análisis),
SolidBody
11(Trim/Extend4)((C3D)
Estructura para Análisis),
SolidBody
12(Trim/Extend5)((C3D)
Estructura para Análisis),
SolidBody
13(Trim/Extend10)((C3D)
Estructura para Análisis),
SolidBody 14(Tube (square)
50 X 50 X 1.5(2)[5])((C3D)
Estructura para Análisis)
Curve Data:N/A

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 7

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

Loads and Fixtures

Fixture name Fixture Image Fixture Details
Entities: 8 Joint(s)
Type: Fixed Geometry

Fixed-1

Load name Load Image Load Details

Entities: 6 Beam (s)
Reference: Face< 1 >
Type: Apply force
Values: ---, ---, 338 N
Force-1 Moments: ---, ---, --- N.m

Reference: Top Plane

Values: 0 0 -9.81
Units: m/s^2

Gravity-1

Connector Definitions
No Data

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 8

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

Contact Information
No Data

Mesh information
Mesh type Beam Mesh

Mesh information – Details

Total Nodes 420
Total Elements 405
Time to complete mesh(hh;mm;ss): 00:00:03
Computer name: JORGE

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 9

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

Sensor Details
No Data

Resultant Forces
Reaction forces
Selection set Units Sum X Sum Y Sum Z Resultant
Entire Model N 3.8147e-05 2415.92 0 2415.92

Reaction Moments
Selection set Units Sum X Sum Y Sum Z Resultant
Entire Model N.m -23.0837 -59.1186 283.801 290.81

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 10

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

Beams
Beam Forces
Joint Axial(N Shear1( Shear2( Moment1(N. Moment2(N. Torque(N.
Beam Name
s ) N) N) m) m) m)
Beam-1(Tube 1 93.9217 18.5602 -320.393 117.769 1.32852 27.3191
(square) 50 X 50 -
2 -18.56 -38.0215 15.2635 16.1597 -27.3192
X 1.5(2)[2]) 93.9217
-
Beam- 1 2.62386 13.4339 6.7937 2.40831 -2.41661
536.705
2(Trim/Extend8)
2 499.246 6.40198 7.1632 -1.67683 0.674508 2.41661
1 228.345 -503.239 -327.421 -102.387 2.28282 106.797
Beam-3(Tube
2 180.413 -76.0046 -2.34685 8.28943 -34.2109 -37.6063
(square) 50 X 50
X 1.5(2)[3]) -
3 503.239 312.581 89.5433 17.9161 -106.797
228.345
Beam- -
1 -39.4042 16.9886 5.67166 41.1814 -7.19608
4(Trim/Extend12 809.493
) 2 844.744 45.6994 8.18518 1.52501 28.3896 7.19609
1 63.0345 -72.0585 38.0214 -31.2909 -16.1597 0.441147
Beam-5(Tube -
2 72.0586 -228.44 -37.3288 -20.9536 -0.441152
(square) 50 X 50 63.0342
X 1.5(2)[1]) -
3 -65.042 41.7255 32.6875 -0.554558 2.02795
14.0535
1 802.114 24.7056 26.148 -11.9485 11.9676 -5.37825
Beam-
-
6(Trim/Extend9) 2 1.09834 -27.7741 -31.9741 7.26208 5.37825
766.989
1 156.028 118.24 2.34685 -28.4233 34.2109 -25.982
Beam-7(Tube -
2 -118.24 -170.969 -11.1003 19.7169 25.982
(square) 50 X 50 156.028
X 1.5(2)[4]) -
3 41.2448 22.4014 29.7311 3.23437 -28.6271
22.5635
1 407.431 -15.4497 26.739 3.61025 5.43537 0.063537
Beam-
-
8(Trim/Extend7) 2 36.4429 -26.7389 17.3571 14.9104 -0.0635352
407.431
Beam-9(Tube -
1 -20.3503 -41.7255 14.5875 0.554558 29.3222
(square) 50 X 50 63.3548
X 1.5(2)[6]) 2 63.3548 20.3503 -317.315 119.229 19.2083 -29.3222
Beam- -
1 -48.0338 176.446 -53.2577 -7.91708 24.0554
10(Trim/Extend1 686.953
1) 2 691.214 43.6404 -154.215 -89.1395 -31.5618 -24.0554
Beam- 1 139.099 404.782 -154.595 -120.369 -260.257 -9.89189
11(Trim/Extend4 -
2 -383.789 154.595 -0.856622 -48.9212 9.89186
) 139.099
1 37.2013 8.96381 -20.4553 16.5763 7.26399 2.79784e-06
Beam-
-
12(Trim/Extend5 8.6991e 4.44653e-
2 2.46596e- 1.58446e-11 -2.35223e-11 -2.53774e-13
) -09 09
09
Beam- 1 481.218 54.81 123.557 67.8384 -21.2692 23.764

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 11

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

13(Trim/Extend1 -
2 -55.0374 -146.684 50.7504 -26.9348 -23.764
0) 477.073
Beam-14(Tube -
1 1.08191 -335.935 -157.074 2.21882 -40.0614
(square) 50 X 50 47.0008
X 1.5(2)[5]) 2 47.0008 -1.08194 -22.4014 9.92619 -3.23436 40.0614

Beam Stresses
Upper bound
Bending Bending
Joint Axial(N/m^2 Torsional axial and
Beam Name Dir1(N/m^2 Dir2(N/m^2
s ) (N/m^2) bending(N/m^2
) )
)
5.21683e+0
1 -333833 -2.72104e+07 306955 2.78512e+07
Beam-1(Tube 6
(square) 50 X 50 X -
1.5(2)[2]) 2 -333834 3.52662e+06 -3.73369e+06 5.21685e+0 7.59415e+06
6
Beam- 1 -1.54382e+06 4.21326e+06 1.21841e+06 -665398 6.97549e+06
2(Trim/Extend8) 2 -1.43607e+06 1.61927e+06 1.29306e+06 665398 4.34839e+06
2.03938e+0
1 811625 -2.36566e+07 -527445 2.49957e+07
7
-
Beam-3(Tube
2 -641256 -1.91527e+06 -7.90441e+06 7.18125e+0 1.04609e+07
(square) 50 X 50 X
6
1.5(2)[3])
-
3 811625 -2.0689e+07 4.13951e+06 2.03938e+0 2.56401e+07
7
Beam- 1 -2.32848e+06 -1.43666e+07 -2.96152e+07 -1.9814e+06 4.63103e+07
4(Trim/Extend12) 2 -2.42988e+06 1.17691e+07 2.1505e+07 1.9814e+06 3.5704e+07
Beam-5(Tube 1 -224049 7.22975e+06 -3.7337e+06 84240.8 1.11875e+07
(square) 50 X 50 X 2 -224048 -8.62482e+06 4.84133e+06 -84241.9 1.36902e+07
1.5(2)[1]) 3 -49951.5 7.55245e+06 128131 387255 7.73053e+06
-
1 -2.30726e+06 1.4808e+07 1.48142e+07 1.48087e+0 3.19294e+07
Beam-
6
6(Trim/Extend9)
1.48087e+0
2 -2.20622e+06 -2.832e+07 -2.02773e+07 5.08036e+07
6
-
1 -554584 6.56719e+06 7.90441e+06 4.96149e+0 1.50262e+07
Beam-7(Tube 6
(square) 50 X 50 X
4.96149e+0
1.5(2)[4]) 2 -554584 -2.56473e+06 -4.55557e+06 7.67489e+06
6
3 -80199.2 6.86936e+06 -747300 -5.4666e+06 7.69685e+06
Beam- 1 1.17196e+06 341694 -2.60226e+06 17494.5 4.11591e+06
8(Trim/Extend7) 2 1.17196e+06 -6.76603e+06 3.7356e+06 -17494.1 1.16736e+07
5.59933e+0
1 -225187 3.37044e+06 -128131 3.72376e+06
Beam-9(Tube 6
(square) 50 X 50 X -
1.5(2)[6]) 2 -225187 -2.75479e+07 4.43807e+06 5.59934e+0 3.22112e+07
6
Beam- 6.62352e+0
1 1.976e+06 3.80339e+07 1.81242e+07 5.81341e+07
10(Trim/Extend11 6

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 12

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

) -
2 1.98826e+06 -5.52989e+07 -1.60159e+07 6.62352e+0 7.33031e+07
6
-
1 400115 2.46931e+07 1.4857e+08 2.72367e+0 1.73663e+08
Beam-
6
11(Trim/Extend4)
2.72367e+0
2 400115 -2.16658e+07 -3.78662e+07 5.99321e+07
6
1 -107008 -9.64655e+06 -1.88758e+06 0.770369 1.16411e+07
Beam-
-6.98753e-
12(Trim/Extend5) 2 2.50227e-05 2.31302e-05 2.5629e-05 7.37819e-05
08
6.54328e+0
1 1.38421e+06 4.33402e+07 -1.43396e+07 5.9064e+07
Beam- 6
13(Trim/Extend10 -
) 2 1.37229e+06 -2.73904e+07 2.10729e+06 6.54328e+0 3.08699e+07
6
-
Beam-14(Tube 1 -167059 -3.6292e+07 -512657 7.65007e+0 3.69717e+07
(square) 50 X 50 X 6
1.5(2)[5]) 7.65008e+0
2 -167059 -2.29344e+06 -747299 3.2078e+06
6

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 13

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

Study Results

Name Type Min Max

Stress1 Upper bound axial and bending 4.915 N/mm^2 (Mpa) 173.66 N/mm^2
Element: 397 (Mpa)
Element: 309

(C3D) Estructura para Análisis-Estructura – Cruceta Hexagonal-Stress-Stress1

Name Type Min Max

Stress2 Axial P/A -2.430e+00N/mm^2 1.988e+00 N/mm^2
(Mpa) (Mpa)
Element: 91 Element: 289

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 14

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

(C3D) Estructura para Análisis-Estructura – Cruceta Hexagonal-Stress-Stress2

Name Type Min Max

Stress3 Bending Ms/Ss -55.299 N/mm^2 43.340 N/mm^2
(Mpa) (Mpa)
Element: 289 Element: 372

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 15

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

(C3D) Estructura para Análisis-Estructura – Cruceta Hexagonal-Stress-Stress3

Name Type Min Max

Stress4 Bending Mt/St -5.492 ksi 21.548 ksi
Element: 290 Element: 309

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 16

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

(C3D) Estructura para Análisis-Estructura – Cruceta Hexagonal-Stress-Stress4

Name Type Min Max

Stress5 Torsional -20.394 N/mm^2 7.650 N/mm^2
(Mpa) (Mpa)
Element: 90 Element: 394

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 17

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

(C3D) Estructura para Análisis-Estructura – Cruceta Hexagonal-Stress-Stress5

Name Type Min Max

Stress6 Shear in DIR 1 -1.161 N/mm^2 4.087 N/mm^2
(Mpa) (Mpa)
Element: 309 Element: 90

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 18

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

(C3D) Estructura para Análisis-Estructura – Cruceta Hexagonal-Stress-Stress6

Name Type Min Max

Stress7 Shear in DIR 2 -2.602 N/mm^2 2.660 N/mm^2
(Mpa) (Mpa)
Element: 1 Element: 89

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 19

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

(C3D) Estructura para Análisis-Estructura – Cruceta Hexagonal-Stress-Stress7

Name Type Min Max

Displacement1 UY: Y Displacement -4.2 mm 0.086 mm
Node: 205 Node: 256

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 20

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

(C3D) Estructura para Análisis-Estructura – Cruceta Hexagonal-Displacement-Displacement1

Name Type Min Max

Displacement2 UX: X Displacement -0.712 mm 0.608 mm
Node: 125 Node: 359

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 21

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

(C3D) Estructura para Análisis-Estructura – Cruceta Hexagonal-Displacement-Displacement2

Name Type Min Max

Displacement3 UZ: Z Displacement -0.358 mm 0.656 mm
Node: 188 Node: 359

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 22

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

(C3D) Estructura para Análisis-Estructura – Cruceta Hexagonal-Displacement-Displacement3

Name Type Min Max

Displacement4 URES: Resultant Displacement 4.915 mm 4.241 mm
Node: 67 Node: 205

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 23

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

(C3D) Estructura para Análisis-Estructura – Cruceta Hexagonal-Displacement-Displacement4

Name Type Min Max

Displacement5 RFX: X Reaction Force -262.504 N 399.605 N
Node: 67 Node: 228

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 24

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

(C3D) Estructura para Análisis-Estructura – Cruceta Hexagonal-Displacement-Displacement5

Name Type Min Max

Displacement6 RFY: Y Reaction Force 4.915 N 691.585 N
Node: 1 Node: 94

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 25

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

(C3D) Estructura para Análisis-Estructura – Cruceta Hexagonal-Displacement-Displacement6

Name Type Min Max

Displacement7 RFZ: Z Reaction Force -706.019 N 486.956 N
Node: 274 Node: 94

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 26

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

(C3D) Estructura para Análisis-Estructura – Cruceta Hexagonal-Displacement-Displacement7

Name Type Min Max

Displacement8 RFRES: Resultant reaction force 4.915 N 846.019 N
Node: 1 Node: 94

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 27

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

(C3D) Estructura para Análisis-Estructura – Cruceta Hexagonal-Displacement-Displacement8

Name Type Min Max

Displacement9 RX: Rotation in X Direction -0.074 deg 0.089 deg
Node: 5 Node: 402

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 28

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

(C3D) Estructura para Análisis-Estructura – Cruceta Hexagonal-Displacement-Displacement9

Name Type Min Max

Displacement10 RY: Rotation in Y Direction -0.054 deg 0.034 deg
Node: 286 Node: 177

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 29

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

(C3D) Estructura para Análisis-Estructura – Cruceta Hexagonal-Displacement-Displacement10

Name Type Min Max

Displacement11 RZ: Rotation in Z Direction -0.401 deg 0.029 deg
Node: 301 Node: 106

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 30

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

(C3D) Estructura para Análisis-Estructura – Cruceta Hexagonal-Displacement-Displacement11

Name Type Min Max

Displacement12 RMX: Reaction Moment about X -55.986 N.m 47.608 N.m
Direction Node: 274 Node: 360

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 31

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

(C3D) Estructura para Análisis-Estructura – Cruceta Hexagonal-Displacement-Displacement12

Name Type Min Max

Displacement13 RMY: Reaction Moment about Y -120.369 N.m 22.342 N.m
Direction Node: 317 Node: 94

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 32

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

(C3D) Estructura para Análisis-Estructura – Cruceta Hexagonal-Displacement-Displacement13

Name Type Min Max

Displacement14 RMZ: Reaction Moment about Z -18.742 N.m 259.056 N.m
Direction Node: 94 Node: 317

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 33

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

(C3D) Estructura para Análisis-Estructura – Cruceta Hexagonal-Displacement-Displacement14

Name Type Min Max

Displacement15 RMRES: Resultant Reaction Moment 4.915 N.m 286.915 N.m
Node: 1 Node: 317

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 34

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

(C3D) Estructura para Análisis-Estructura – Cruceta Hexagonal-Displacement-Displacement15

Name Type Min Max

Factor of Safety1 Automatic – VM 1.440e+00 3.000e+00
Node: 316 Node: 1

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 35

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

(C3D) Estructura para Análisis-Estructura – Cruceta Hexagonal-Factor of Safety-Factor of Safety1

Name Type Min Max

Equation1 “URES: Resultant Displacement” 0.000e+00 SI 4.241e-03 SI
Node: 67 Node: 205

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 36

 LíneAceroEC Ing. Jorge W. Carrera B. Msc.
12/11/2021

(C3D) Estructura para Análisis-Estructura – Cruceta Hexagonal-Equation-Equation1

Conclusion

 La Estructura Metálica formada por tubos cuadrados (50 x1.5mm), ángulo de alas iguales (40 x
6mm), abrazaderas de diámetro 250mm y pernos de 5/8 pulg., soporta las cargas de 76 libras
(34.473 Kg / 337 N) en cada lado del Hexagono.
 Material de la Estructura ASTM A-36.
 Factor de Seguridad de la Estructura Metálica es de 1.4 lo que indica que soporta el 40% adicional
de su carga nominal.

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of (C3D) Estructura para Análisis 37