BRS20103 RM - Assignment Instruction & Rubric - Feb 2023

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

SESSION: FEBRUARY 2023

BRS20103 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT
Literature Review Research (& Article Summary)

PREPARED FOR:
Dr. FORBIS AHAMED
Individual Report
NAME MATRIX ID (100 Marks)
Weightage: 20%

[Photo]

DATE OF SUBMISSION: WEEK 6


20Th MAR 2023 (MONDAY)

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND LAW


FACULTY OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT & PROFESSIONAL STUDIES
MANAGEMENT AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY
BRS20103 Research Methodology (BHCM)
Assignment 1: Introduction, Literature Review, and Conceptual Framework
Mode: Individual Report
Submission Date: 20th March 2023 (Monday)
Weightage: 20%

Course Outcomes
CO1 Understand the importance of research for solving problem in markets and
organizations
CO5 Design appropriate research methods including data type, collection methods,
questionnaire and sampling

Activities
Select any of the research topics proposed below and collect 10 research paper/articles
related to the same topic from EMERALD (EKLAS) and Google scholar. Then, perform
the following:
First, summarize the 10 QUANTITAIVE research articles published in online journals (by
every individual) and provide the summary of each article in the Table below:

Summarization of the articles


No Authors Problem statement Objectives Key Findings
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

* Authors: Use only the first name of each author and the (year). E.g. Ibrahim (2016), or Hanifa & Salim (2017). In case
of more than 2 authors, you just need to put the name of the first author followed by “et al.”. E.g. Imran et al. (2018).

Second, using the existing literature (these articles as well as other articles), you are
suggested to write a systematic literature review and develop a research framework
followed by hypotheses based on relationship between IVs and DV in the framework.
Your hypotheses MUST be supported by the existing literature (Previous Studies).
Below are some proposed variables that you can use in your framework (You can
use other HR RELATED variables and generate ideas from the article review):
Review of the literature must include descriptions on all study variables, such as:
1. ……………... (DV)
2. ……………... (IV1)
3. ……………... (IV2)
4. ……………... (IV3)
5. ……………... (IV4), add here if you identified more IVs
*Example: One Dependent Variable (DV) & Multiple Independent variable (IVs)
Report Format
Headline (Font Size) : 14 (Bold)
Subhead (Font Size) : 12 (Bold)
Spacing : 1.5
Alignment : Justified
Font : Times New Roman (12)/ Arial (11)

Report structure (Example) – page # may vary based on your arrangement*


- Page 1: Cover Page (MSU Standard) Names, Matric Numbers & personal photos
- Page 2: Rubric
- Page 3: Table of Contents
- Page 4: Introduction
- Page 5: Problem Statement
- Page 6: Research Objectives
- Page 7: Literature Review* (variables, framework, hypothesis, relevant theories)
- Summarization of the articles (in Table - landscape layout).
(Note: It is advisable to write summary of the review in paragraph form too
describing the variables one by one – you may begin with your DV)
- Page ….: The research conceptual framework followed by the hypotheses.
- Page …: References of all the used materials (articles and books). Please arrange your
references in alphabetical order (*Use APA referencing style only).
- Page…: Appendix – evidence (1st page of each the articles).

*Note 1: Marks will be deducted for late submission


*Note 2: Any evidence of individuals found copying from each other will cause MAJOR
mark deduction or ZERO mark for every individual involved in the misconduct.
Rubric Assignment 1: Literature Review (& Article summaries)
BRS20103 Research Methodology (BHCM)

Names: Matric No:

ARTICLE REVIEW SUMMARIES

9-10 M 7-8 M 5-6 M 3-4 M 1-2 M Marks


Problem Very well Well- Acceptable Mediocre Poorly
statement explained explained explanation explanation understood
Objectives Very well Well- Acceptable Mediocre Poorly
explained explained explanation explanation understood
Key findings Very well Well- Acceptable Mediocre Poorly
explained explained explanation explanation understood
CONCEPTUAL MODEL (FRAMEWORK) Sub-total

8-10 M 4-7 M 1-3 M


Underpinning Related and Related but with moderate No related or poorly
Theories well explained explanation explained

Discussion on 23-30 M 16-22 M 8-15 M 1-7 M


relationships & Well Acceptable Not clear Poorly formulated
Hypotheses formulated formulation formulation

17-20 M 13-16 M 9-12 M 5-8 M 1-4 M


Very clear & Clear Some Many wrong Wrong
Research
logical relationships mistakes on assumptions relationship
model/
presentation proposed the suggested regarding the and/or with
Framework
of relationship among the relationships relationships arrowhead
(drawn)
among the variables among suggested
variables variables
Evidence 8-10 M 4-7 M 1-3 M
(articles) Quite Available but not proper Not available
Complete and/or complete

Grand TOTAL /100

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy