Journal of Engineering Research and Reports

21(4): 1-10, 2021; Article no.JERR.73594

ISSN: 2582-2926

The use of Crushed Waste Glass as a Partial

Replacement of Fine Aggregates in Asphalt
Concrete Mixtures (Glassphalt)
Gbadamosi Aderemi Tobi a*, Ogunsuyi Raphael Abidemi a
and Ojo Meshach Felix a
a
Department of Civil Engineering, Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria.

Authors’ contributions

This work was carried out in collaboration among all authors. All authors read and approved the final
manuscript.

Article Information

DOI: 10.9734/JERR/2021/v21i417455
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Djordje Cica, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Reviewers:
(1) Hoikwan Lee, Dankook University, South Korea.
(2) Abdul Hameed, Osmania University, India.
Complete Peer review History: http://www.sdiarticle4.com/review-history/73594

Received 20 July 2021

Accepted 29 September 2021
Original Research Article
Published 03 November 2021

ABSTRACT
With the rapid economic growth and continuously increased consumption, a large amount of glass
waste materials is generated; this study investigated the effect of crushed waste glass as filler and
also as an aggregate in the asphalt binder course. It compares the glassphalt mix with the
specification range at different percentages to meet specifications limit according to Nigeria roads
and bridges reverse book of 1997 Waste glass are cleaned and crushed from the glass bottles and
added to the asphalt as a filler and as a replacement for coarse aggregates, the marshal method is
used to determine the optimum bitumen content and evaluate the properties of the asphalt mix.
However, 24 samples were prepared in total, 12 samples each for the asphalt mix used to
determine the optimum bitumen content and the other 12 samples for the glassphalt mix used to
find out the effect of adding the different percentages of crushed waste glass to the asphalt
mixture. The Marshall test carried out on the asphalt mixtures showed that the optimum bitumen
content of bitumen was found out to be 6.2% of the asphalt mix by weight. Also, Marshall Test
carried out on the glassphalt mix showed the optimum percentage of glass used in the binder
course of the weights of aggregates in the asphalt mix. The result of this experiment is been
checked to be consistent with the Nigeria road and bridges reverse book of 1997, i.e. Marshall
Stability, flow, bulk density, and air voids.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

*Corresponding author: Email: tobiaderemigbadamosi@gmail.com;

 Tobi et al.; JERR, 21(4): 1-10, 2021; Article no.JERR.73594

Keywords: Glassphlat; asphalt concrete; glass waste; optimum bitumen content; marshall test.

1. INTRODUCTION crushed glass in asphalt pavements include the

high angularity of the crushed glass which can
1.1 Background of the Study enhance the stability of glass asphalt mixes
when compared with conventional asphalt mixes
The use of sustainable and cost-effective with virgin aggregates [10-12,6]. Other favorable
alternative materials for asphalt mixes in road characteristics include low absorption, specific
and airfield pavements has been recently gravity and thermal conductivity, which enhances
emphasized due to the potential depletion of heat retention in mixes with glass.
natural aggregate sources and the increasing
awareness of environmental issues i.e., green Up till now, in Nigeria, there are few
gas emissions, disposals, etc., associated with investigations on the application of waste glass in
conventional asphalt materials [1,2]. For instance, the field of pavement, not to mention field
industrial by-products (e.g. steel slag) are gaining applications.
adoption worldwide for road construction. The
waste crushed glass that is processed can be The main objectives of the research are as
used as a portion of fine aggregate in asphalt follows
paving mixes [3-5]. Satisfactory performance has
been obtained from hot mix asphalt pavements  To determine the optimum glass content of
incorporating 10 to 15 percent crushed glass in a selected mix for the Asphalt wearing
wearing surface mixes [6]. The term "glassphalt" course.
has at times been used to describe these  To determine the optimum bitumen content
pavements [7]. A study by Flynn [8] for the selected mix of asphalt
demonstrated that optimum performance can  Find out the effect of adding different
best be achieved when crushed glass is used as percentages of crushed waste glass on the
a fine aggregate substitute in asphalt pavements mechanical properties of asphalt mix.
as opposed to larger-sized glass particles which  Determine the optimum percent of crushed
adversely affects pavement performance due to waste glass to be added to the hot mix
raveling and stripping related problems. asphalt.
Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that
when glass is utilized as a substitute fine 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
aggregate in hot mix asphalt, the performance-
related properties are comparable to The materials used in the research are:
conventional asphalt mixes [9]. When the glass
was initially implemented in asphalt pavements in 2.1 Aggregate
the early 1960s and 1970's, glass particles
greater than 12.7 mm and quantities more than The aggregates commonly used for asphalt
25 percent by weight of mix were utilized mixes are fine and coarse aggregates, the
[Recycled Materials Resource Centre-RMRC, aggregates used in the course of the research
USA]. Factors such as the lack of absorption of were brought in from Itami-Ekiti Quarry in Ekiti
bitumen by the glass and the hydrophilic state, sieve analysis test was carried out on all
properties of glass also contribute to the moisture the aggregates which follow the BS 1377,1990.
damage (stripping and raveling) experienced by Table (1) shows the gradation of aggregate and
glass asphalt pavements; particularly when high Table (2) summarizes the properties of
percentages and large particles are introduced aggregate used in the research.
into the surface course. Hughes [1990] revealed
that the addition of hydrated lime (approximately 2.2 Asphalt
1 to 3 percent by weight of aggregate) to mix with
glass acts as an antistripping agent and reduces In this research, a kind of asphalt binder with a
potential stripping problems. The study indicated 70/80 penetration grade was used for producing
that although antistripping agents could be all test specimens. Physical properties tests for
beneficial, however, satisfactory performance this asphalt cement were conducted in the
can be achieved if only fine-grained glass (4.75 Materials and Soil Laboratory of Federal
mm) is used with substitution rates not Polytechnic Ado-Ekiti. The table below shows the
surpassing 15 percent. The benefits of utilizing physical properties of used bitumen.

2
 Tobi et al.; JERR, 21(4): 1-10, 2021; Article no.JERR.73594

Table 1. Gradation of Aggregate

Sieve Size Specification Percentage Percentage Cumulative %

Limits % passing Passing Retained passing
¾ ” (19.5mm) 100 100 0 0
½ ” (12.5mm) 80-100 90 10 10
3/8” (9.5mm) 56-80 68 22 32
#4 (4.76mm) 35-56 45 23 55
#8 (2.36mm) 23-38 30 15 70
0.85mm 13-27 20 10 80
0.425mm 8-12 10 10 90
0.0075mm 2-8 5 5 95
pan 100

Table 2. Used Aggregates in this Research

Material Type of Aggregates Size of Aggregrate Percentage in the Mix

Coarse Granite 19.5mm 17%
Stone Dust 9.5mm 15%
Fine Quarry Dust 4.75mm 30%
River Sand 0.6mm 28%
Filler 10%

Table 3. Properties of the Asphalt Used in this Research

Test Specification Test result

Penetration @ 25 ASTM D5 70.45
Flash Point ASTM D92 273
Softening Point ASTM D36 47.2
Fire Point ASTM D92 284
Ductility ASTM D113 140.3
Specific Gravity ASTM D70 1.02

Table 4. Sieve Analysis gradations of the crushed waste glass

Sievesize (mm) Sieve # Percentage of Sample Passing

4.75 #4 97.67
2.36 #8 69.33
1.18 #16 51.00
0.6 #30 36.00
0.425 #40 30.00
0.3 #50 26.00
0.15 #100 20.13
0.075 #200 16.67
Pan pan 0.00

3
 Tobi et al.; JERR, 21(4): 1-10, 2021; Article no.JERR.73594

2.3 Crushed Waste Glass 3.1 Determination of Optimum Bitumen

Content
Fine passing sieve # 4-4.75mm with the
graduation of waste glass was used. Table (4) To determine the optimum asphalt content for the
presents the sieve analysis gradations of the mixture, the procedure indicated by the standard
crushed waste glass. American Institute MS-2 Manual (2008) and
ASTM D1559 (2008) was followed as part of this
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION study. Three specimens at each asphalt content
(5.0 5.4, 5.8 6 .2, 6.6, and 7%) were tested for
Data analysis and results of laboratory stability, flow, and air voids in mineral aggregate.
investigations that were conducted to study the The optimum bitumen content of bituminous
effect of using crushed waste glass in asphalt mixtures is determined based on the average
binder course specifically, the influence of glass values that satisfy the sets of requirements for
content on the flow, and air voids content of Marshall Stability, Marshall Flow, air voids, VMA
asphalt concrete will be presented in this chapter. and VFB.
Marshall Method for designing hot asphalt
mixtures was used to determine the optimum 3.1.1 Marshall stability
bitumen content to be added to a specific
aggregate blend. Also, Marshall Method for Stability against varying bitumen contents.
designing hot asphalt mixtures was used to
evaluate the specimens of glasphalt to determine The stability of the specimen is the maximum
the best content of glasphalt. The results of this load required to produce a failure of the
study only apply to the specific gradation of glass specimen when the load is applied at a constant
and the type of mixes that were used. Other rate of 50 mm/min [13]. From the Fig. below it is
gradations of glass or source may produce noticed that the maximum stability of asphalt mix
different results. is 940 kg at 6.2 % bitumen content.

Table 5. Summary of the Marshall Test result

Bitume Sample Corr. Flow Bulk Void Volume SGM Void Voids in
n (% No. Stability (mm) Density in of filled mineral
by total bitumen with aggregate
total mix bitumen (VMA)
weight) (VFB)
1 625.0 2.5 2.269 8.8 11.18 2.495 55.8 20
5.0 2 650.0 2.9 2.289 8.8 11.16 2.495 55.7 20
Avg. 637.5 2.7 2.279 8.8 11.17 2.495 55.9 20
1 762.0 2.8 2.33 6.7 12.30 2.479 64.7 19.4
5.4 2 763.0 2.8 2.32 6.75 12.30 2.479 64.7 19.4
Avg. 762.5 2.8 2.325 6.7 12.30 2.479 64.7 19.4
1 862.5 3.5 2.34 5.3 13.29 2.465 71.3 18.6
5.8 2 886.6 3.5 2.32 5.3 13.29 2.465 71.3 18.6
Avg. 874.5 3.5 2.40 5.3 13.29 2.465 71.3 18.6
1 910.0 4.2 2.36 3.76 14.34 2.44 79.2 18.1
6.2 2 964.0 4.2 2.36 3.76 14.34 2.44 79.2 18.1
Avg. 937.0 4.2 2.36 3.76 14.34 2.44 79.2 18.1
1 834.6 4.5 2.36 3.3 15.50 2.435 82.4 17.4
6.6 2 834.6 4.5 2.34 3.3 15.50 2.435 82.4 17.6
Avg. 834.6 4.5 2.35 3.3 15.50 2.435 82.4 17.5
1 834.4 5.0 2.28 5.9 15.6 2.42 72.5 17.0
7.0 2 743.7 5.0 2.28 5.9 15.6 2.42 72.5 17.0
Avg. 743.8 5.0 2.28 5.9 15.6 2.42 72.5 17.0

4
 Tobi et al.; JERR, 21(4): 1-10, 2021; Article no.JERR.73594

Fig. 1. A graph of Stability against volume of bitumen and stability

Fig. 2. A graph of flow against volume of bitumen

Fig. 3. A graph of bulk density against volume of bitumen

Fig. 4. A graph of Void in total mix against volume of bitumen

5
 Tobi et al.; JERR, 21(4): 1-10, 2021; Article no.JERR.73594

3.1.2 Flow compacted paving mixture [1]. From Figure

below it is noticed that the air voids content
Flow is the total amount of deformation which gradually decreases with increasing the bitumen
occurs at maximum load [13]. From the figure content this is because of the increase in voids
below it is noticed that the maximum flow is filled with bitumen in the asphalt mix.
recorded at 7% bitumen content. This indicates
that greater deformation is recorded as bitumen 3.1.5 Voids in mineral aggregates
content increases.
The voids in the mineral aggregate, VMA, are
3.1.3 Bulk density defined as the intergranular void space between
the aggregate particles in a compacted paving
Bulk density is the actual density of the mixture that includes the air voids and the
compacted mix. Fig. (3) represents the bulk effective bitumen content, expressed as a
density results for varying bitumen contents. The percent of the total volume [2]. From Figure (5)
bulk density of the HMA increases as the it's noticed that the VMA decreases gradually as
bitumen content increase till it reaches its peak at bitumen content increase but rises gradually at
the optimum bitumen content and then starts to bitumen content beyond 6.2%.
decline gradually at higher bitumen content.
From the figure below its noticed that the 3.1.6 Voids filled with bitumen
maximum bulk density is 2.36 g/cm3 at 6.2 %
bitumen content. The voids filled with bitumen, VFB, is the
percentage of the intergranular void space
3.1.4 Voids In total mix between the aggregate particles (VMA) that are
filled with bitumen [1]. From Figure (6) it's noticed
The air voids, Va, is the total volume of the small that the VFB% increases gradually as bitumen
pockets of air between the coated aggregate content increases. This occurs because as
particles throughout a compacted paving mixture, bitumen content increases more void spaces
expressed as a percent of the bulk volume of the between mineral aggregates.

Fig. 5. A graph of VMA against volume of bitumen

Fig. 6. Voids filled with bitumen against varying bitumen contents

6
 Tobi et al.; JERR, 21(4): 1-10, 2021; Article no.JERR.73594

3.1.7 Optimum bitumen content (OBC) percentages of crushed waste glass and the
results are presented below.
The optimum bitumen content was found equal
to 6.2% by weight of the total mix which is 3.3 Marshall Stability
calculated as the average of bitumen content
values that correspond to the maximum From the figure below, a steady rise in stability is
stability, maximum density and median of the air recorded as crushed waste glass content is
voids increased. However, at higher glass content
Marshall stability decreases. A minimum value of
1. Bitumen content at the maximum stability = 3.5kn is given as the required standard for the
6.2 % stability of wearing course from the Nigeria
2. Bitumen content at the maximum value of standard for roads and bridges revised
bulk density = 6.2% edition,1997. Percentages from 7.5% –17.5 %
3. Bitumen content at the median percent of meets this local requirement.
air voids = 6.15%
3.3.1 Flow
Optimum Bitumen Content (OBC) = (6.2 +6.2+
6.15) / 3 = 6.18% approx. 6.2%. The flow gives a slightly higher range value when
compared to conventional Hot Mix asphalts. The
3.2 Glassphalts Results flow percentage values of 5.0% - 10% oscillate
around the value of conventional mix which is
18 samples of glasphalt each weigh 1200gm 2mm – 4mm according to local specifications [2].
were prepared using six different crushed glass
content (5.0,7.5,10.0,12.5,15 and 17.5 %) by the 3.3.2 Bulk density
weight of total mix using the optimum bitumen
content (6.2% by the weight of total mix). The bulk density data gotten achieves the local
3
Crushed waste glass replaced river sand using and international specification which is 2.3 g/cm
the aforementioned percentages and mixed with at a glass percentage value of 10% through to
other aggregates. Marshall Stability tests were 17.5%. The general trend shows that the bulk
performed on the samples with different density increases as the glass content increases.

Table 6. Summary of properties of Asphalt mix with Crushed waste Glass

Glass Sample Corr. Flow Bulk Void Volume SGM Void Voids in
content No. Stability (mm) Density in of filled mineral
(%) total bitumen with aggregate
mix bitumen (VMA)
(VFB)
1 2.79 3.8 2.33 6.7 11.43 2.494 63.3 17.9
5.0 2 2.79 3.8 2.33 6.5 11.41 2.494 63.5 18.0
Avg. 2.79 3.8 2.33 6.6 11.42 2.494 63.4 18.0
1 3.534 4.0 2.343 5.4 12.43 2.48 70.3 17.7
7.5 2 3.534 4.0 2.353 5.2 12.43 2.478 70.1 17.7
Avg. 3.534 4.0 2.348 5.3 12.43 2.479 70.2 17.7
1 4.743 4.0 2.35 4.4 13.43 2.465 75.3 17.7
10 2 4.743 4.0 2.35 4.2 13.41 2.465 75.3 17.7
Avg. 4.743 4.0 2.35 4.3 13.42 2.465 75.3 17.7
1 4.836 5.8 2.373 3.2 14.41 2.45 82.0 17.61
12.5 2 4.836 5.8 2.373 3.2 14.43 2.45 82.0 17.61
Avg. 4.836 5.8 2.373 3.2 14.42 2.45 82.0 17.61
1 5.4 6.0 2.39 1.8 15. 2.418 89.7 17.4
15 2 5.4 6.0 2.39 1.8 15.450 2.416 89.5 17.5
Avg. 5.4 6.0 2.39 1.8 15.550 2.417 89.6 17.3
1 6.032 6.4 2.410 0.46 16.55 2.421 97.3 17.0
17.5 2 6.032 6.4 2.410 0.46 16.53 2.421 97.3 17.0
Avg. 6.032 6.4 2.410 0.46 16.54 2.421 97.3 17.0

7
 Tobi et al.; JERR, 21(4): 1-10, 2021; Article no.JERR.73594

3.3.3 Voids in total mix 3.4 Analysis of Result

The air voids of Glasphalt mix decreases Glassphalt surfaces appear to dry faster than
gradually as the glass content increase. This traditional paving after rain, because the glass
decline in air voids in Glasphalt mixes return to particles do not absorb water. Glassphalt
the reduction in internal pores of glass than river surfaces are more reflective than conventional
sand It's noticed that glass percentages 7.5% - asphalt and may improve night-time road
10.0% fall in the range of local specification 3% - visibility.
5% and are very close to the median value of
international specification of 4.0%. From the figure below, it is noticed that all values
of Marshall Stability for different glass content
3.3.4 Voids in mineral aggregates satisfy the local and international specifications
which are (3.5KN) apart from the 5% of crushed
From the results gotten, it can be seen that the glass. It should also be observed from the table
voids in mineral aggregates decrease slightly as that all our needed parameters are within the
the glass content increase. This is a result of range of the local specifications according to
better intergranular bonding as the glass content Nigeria Roads and Bridges design specifications
is added. [2].

Fig. 7. A graph of stability against varying glass content

Fig. 8. Flow against varying glass contents

Fig. 9. Bulk Density against varying glass contents

8
 Tobi et al.; JERR, 21(4): 1-10, 2021; Article no.JERR.73594

Fig. 10. Voids in total mix against varying glass contents

Fig. 11. Voids in mineral aggregates against varying glass contents

Table 7. Summary of the Glassphalt Properties

Glass Content % Stability Flow Bulk Density Voids in total mix VFB
5.0 2.79 3.8 2.33 6.6 63.4
7.5 3.534 4.0 2.348 5.3 70.2
10.0 4.73 4.0 2.35 4.3 75.3
12.5 4.836 5.8 2.373 3.2 82.0
15.0 5.4 6.0 2.39 1.8 89.6
17.5 6.032 6.4 2.410 0.46 97.3

Table 8. Nigeria Roads and Bridges Specifications [2]

Property Specifications
Min Max
Stability 3.5KN -
Flow 2mm 4mm
Void in total mix 3% 5%
Volume Filled with Bitumen 75% 82%
Bulk density 2.35 2.35

By using different percentages of glass waste, Course, where the results can be concluded as
10% glassphalt which satisfied all the the following:
requirements as per the specification limit was
found to be Optimum Glass Content.  The existence of crushed glass in the
asphalt binder course mixture is
4. CONCLUSION considered an eco-friendly material and it
can be utilized as sustainable
The objective of this study is to investigate the management of waste glass.
effect of using crushed waste glass as a filler and  Crushed waste glass can be used in
as coarse aggregates in the Asphalt wearing asphalt binder course with the maximal

9
 Tobi et al.; JERR, 21(4): 1-10, 2021; Article no.JERR.73594

size of 4.75mm and the optimum 4. ASTM, 1992, ‘Test Method for Bulk
replacement of 10% of river sand (0/4.75) Specific Gravity and Density of Compacted
aggregate. Bituminous Mixtures Using Saturated
 The results of Marshall Stability, flow, bulk Surface-Dry Specimens’, ASTM D 2041,
density and air voids of glasphalt are Philadephia, US.
consistent with the specifications range at 5. ASTM 2004, ‘Test Method for Resistance
the different percentages of glass contents to Plastic Flow of Bituminous Mixtures
(5.0% - 17.5%). Using Marshall Apparatus’, Annual Bool,
 Marshall Stability and the bulk density D3515-01, Vol 04.03
achieve the requirements of the local and 6. Wartman, J, Grubb, D & Nasim A. ‘Select
international specifications with 10% glass Engineering Characteristics of Crushed
content. Glass’. Journal of Materials in Civil
 At 10% glass content the value of flow Engineering. 2004;16(6):526–539.
consistent with the local specification and 7. Kandahl, P. S. 1992. Waste materials in
slightly higher than the maximum limit of hot mix asphalt National Center for Asphalt
the international specification. 8. Flynn, L “Recycled Plastic Finds Home in
 The results of this study apply only to the Asphalt Binder”; 1993.
specific gradation and the type of glass 9. Chesner, W. "Waste glass and sewage
that was used. Other gradations of glass or sludge ash use in asphalt pavement".
resources may produce different results. Utilization of Waste Materials in Civil
Engineering Construction. American
COMPETING INTERESTS Society of Civil Engineering.
10. Nigeria standard for roads and bridges
Authors have declared that no competing revised edition; 1997
interests exist. 11. O'Flaherty C, et al. The location, design,
construction and maintenance of
REFERENCES road pavements Butterworth-
Heinemann publications Fourth edition;
1. America Institute MS-2 Manual; 2008 2002.
2. Arnold G, Werkmeister, Alabaster S, D. the 12. Standard specification for fine aggregate
for bituminous paving mixtures-18th ed.,
effect of adding recycled glass on the
ASTM D1073-94, AASHTO- M29.
performance of base course aggregate
13. Jendia, S 2000, ‘Highway Engineering-
New Zealand: NZ Tr ansport Agency
Research Report 351 bridges; 2008. Structural Design’, Dar El-Manara
3. ASTM. ‘Method for Sieve Analysis for Fine Library.
and Coarse Aggregrate’, ASTM C136,
Philadephia, US; 1992.

© 2021 Tobi et al.; This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited.

Peer-review history:
The peer review history for this paper can be accessed here:
http://www.sdiarticle4.com/review-history/73594

10