Before The Session Judge Mohmond

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6

BEFORE THE SESSION JUDGE MOHMOND

Cr.R.No._______/2020

Dawajan S/o Sefat


R/O Aipi Kor Dawezai Tehsil Padialai, District Mohmond.
.. . Petitioner/Complainant
Versus
1. Rahim S/o Tamin
R/O Aipi Kor Dawezai Tehsil Padialai, District Mohmond

2. The State. .. . Respondents

__________________

REVISION PETITION U/S 439 A Cr.P.C


AGAINST THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
AND ORDER DATED 08.01.2020 PASSED
BY THE LEARNED JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE-11 MOHMOND,
WHEREBY THE COMPLAINT
OF PETITIOER / COMPLAINANT
HELD NOT MAINTAINABLE AND
DISMISSED.

Prayer-In-Revision:
2

On acceptance of this revision petition, the


impugned judgement and order dated
08/01/2020 passed by the learned judicial
magistrate-11 mohmond my kindly be set-
aside, the complaint of the

petitioner/complainant be maintained for


further proceeding according to law and
fair trail opportunity be provided to the
petitioner/complainant according to law.
___________________

Respectfully Sheweth:

The facts of the case are as under:

1. That the petitioner/complainant is the permanent resident of


Aipi Kor Dawezai Tehsil Padialai, District Mohmond and is
owner of large number of land, while the respondent No1.is
residing in city Lahore and visited the village in a special
occasion. the disputed land is also surrounded by the land of
petitioner/complainant situated in village Aipi kor dawezai
Pandiali.

2. That the respondent No.1 purchased 08 (jerab) land in the


middle of the land of the petitioner/complainant with bad
intention. To this effect the petitioner/complainant file a suit of
pre-emption in the court of civil judge-11which is still pending.

3. That there was a previous dispute between the parties and due
to which he purchased this property, on which several times
quarreled occurred between the parties and apprehension of
breach of peace is there.

4. That there was a breach of piece on this disputed land to this


effect the complainant filed a complaint u/s 145 Cr.p.c in the
subordinate court and he sent that the complaint to the police
for legal proceedings, and the police gave the detail in the naqal
mad, which support the version of the complainant, despite that
the learned Judicial \magistrate without considering the merits
of the case dismissed the complaint, held, not maintainable.
3

(Attested copy of the impugned judgment dated 08/01/2020 is


Annexed as Annexure “A”)

Now the petitioner/ complainant approaches this


Honourable Court, inter alia, on the following amongst other
grounds;

G R O U N D S:

A. That the impugned order and judgment dated 08/01/2020 of


Judicial Magistrate-11 Mohmond which is against law, facts
and evidence available on record.

B. That the impugned order and judgment dated 08/01/2020 of


Judicial Magistrate-11 Mohmond is neither appropriate, nor in
consonance with the provisions of law.

C. That the facts and circumstances also support the version the
petitioner/ complainant.

D. That the petitioner/ complainant seeks leave of this Honourable


Court to raise additional grounds at the time of arguments.

It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that


on acceptance of this revision petition, the
impugned judgement and order dated
08/01/2020 passed by the learned judicial
magistrate-11 mohmond my kindly be set-
aside, the complaint of the
petitioner/complainant be maintained for
further proceeding according to law and
fair trail opportunity be provided to the
petitioner/complainant according to law.
Petitioner/Complainant
Through

Jehan Parwar
&
Syed Shakeel Ahmad
Dated: 12/02/2020 Advocate
High Court,
4

C E R T I F I C A T E:

As per instructions of my client petitioner/ complainant no such like


revision petition has earlier been filed before this Honourable Court.
Advocate
BEFORE THE PESHAWAR HIGH COURT, PESHAWAR

Cr.R.No._______/2016

Junas Khan .…………………………... . Petitioner/Complainant


Versus
Qazi Ilyas-ul-Haq & another. ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Respondents

I N D E X

S.No Description of Documents Annex Pages


1. Opening Sheet A
2. Revision Petition 1-5
3. Copy of judgment dated 15.11.2016 “A” 6-16
passed by learned ASJ-IV, Nowshera
4. Wakalatnama 17

Petitioner/Complainant
Through

Muhammad Saeed Khan


Advocate
High Court, Peshawar
Dated: 25.11.2016 Cell: 0300-9020797
(A)

Opening Sheet for Criminal Revisions


(U/S 439 Criminal Procedure Code)
IN THE PESHAWAR HIGH COURT, PESHAWAR
(Judicial Department)
Criminal Revision No._____________/2016

District Date of Whether filed by complainant in Stamp on


Filing person or by pleader or agent petition
Petition

Peshawar 25.11.2016 Muhammad Saeed Khan Nil


Advocate, Peshawar

Junas Khan .…………………………............. . Petitioner/Complainant


Versus
Qazi Ilyas-ul-Haq & another. ... . . . . . . . . . . . ……….. . . Respondents

Appeal against the order of: Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Nowshera

Dated: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15.11.2016

Charge u/s: . . . . . . . . . . . 302/324/ 34 PPC

Sentence: . . . . . . . . . . . . Accused/ respondent No.1 was convicvted and


sentenced u/s 302 PPC for life imprisonment
alongwith fine of Rs.2,00,000/- to be paid to the
legal heirs of both the deceased, benefit of
Section 382-B Cr.PC was also extended to the
accused

Prayer: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . On acceptance of this revision petition, the


imprisonment awarded to convict/ respondent
No.1 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV
Nowshera vide order dated 15.11.2016 Session
case No.7 of 2016 may very graciously be
enhanced to major penalty of death alongwith
compensation amount may also be enhanced
according to law.

(GROUNDS OF REVISION ARE ATTACHED)

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy