Farap 4504
Farap 4504
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING & REPORTING / AUDITING PRACTICE S. IRENEO G. MACARIOLA C. ESPENILLA J. BINALUYO
Problem 2: On March 1, 2022, Helium Company purchased an equipment from a local dealer under the terms of
3/15, n/30 for P3,000,000. Helium Company paid installation costs of P14,000. In addition, Helium Company paid
advertising and promotional expense amounting to P 20,000 and incurred initial operating losses of P 12,000.
Helium Company paid the account on March 16, 2022.
Problem 3: Lithium Corporation purchased a new Machine on November 1, 2022. A P2,000 down payment was
made and two annual installments of P4,000 each are to be made beginning November 1, 2023. The machine
has no cash price equivalent but the prevailing interest rate for this type of note is 10%. The present value of P1
at 10% for 2 periods is 0.8264 while the present value of ordinary annuity at 10% for 2 periods is 1.7355.
Problem 4: Bery Company acquired Land from Abe Company which will be used as a plant site in exchange for
20,000 newly issued shares of Bery’s ordinary shares. At the date of acquisition, the Bery’s ordinary shares had
a par value of P20 per share and a fair value of P30 per share. The fair value of the Land was P 500,000 when
Abe Company acquired this 2 years ago.
Problem 5: Below are the data relative to Boron’s asset that was exchanged for a new asset:
Old Equipment
Book Value Fair Value Cash Paid
With Commercial Substance 75,000 85,000 15,000
Lacking Commercial Substance 50,000 75,000 7,000
Problem 6: Oxygen Company constructed its own factory building. The company had a P1,000,000, two-year
12% loan specifically obtained to finance the asset construction. The construction began on January 1, 2019 and
the building was completed on October 31, 2020. Expenditures on the building were made as follows:
January 1, 2019 800,000 March 1,2020 600,000
April 30, 2019 300,000 September 30,2020 400,000
November 1, 2019 600,000
Oxygen Company has the following outstanding loans:
General borrowings:
10% note issued prior to construction of the new building, term, 10 years, P3,000,000.
15% note issued prior to construction of the new building, term, 15 years, P2,000,000.
Problem 7: On April 1, 2021, Fluorine Company acquired an equipment worth P2,500,000 for its operations. The
equipment has an estimated useful life of 10 years with P300,000 residual value. It’s the company’s policy to
depreciate all equipment using the SYD method.
2. How much is the accumulated depreciation on December 31, 2022 assuming the method is double declining
balance method?
a. 875,000 b. 800,000 c. 770,000 d. 704,000
Problem 8: On January 1, 2019, Neon Company acquired an equipment worth P2,050,000 for its operations.
The equipment has an estimated useful life of 8 years and an estimated salvage value of P50,000. It’s the
company’s policy to depreciate all equipment using the straight-line basis. On January 1, 2021, Neon Company
revised the total useful life of the equipment to be 5 years from the date of acquisition.
Problem 9: On June 1, 2020, Sodium Mining Company purchased a mineral mine for P2,000,000 with removal
ore estimates at 1,000,000 tons. Sodium expects to extract 10,000 tons per month. The property has an
estimated value of P200,000 after the ore has been extracted. Sodium Mining Company incurred P280,000 in
exploration and evaluation costs in establishing the technical feasibility and commercial viability of the property
and P220,000 of intangible development costs (cost of constructing tunnels, sinking mine shafts, etc.) to
preparing the property for ore extraction.
Sodium Mining Company also purchased a new equipment on the same date costing P1,500,000 with a useful life
of 8 years. However, after all the resources are removed, the equipment will be of no use and will be sold for
P150,000. During 2020, 60,000 tons were extracted and sold. The company is using the straight-line method.
Problem 10: On January 1, 2016, Magnesium Company purchased a machinery for P600,000, with an estimated
economic useful life of 12 years. Straight line method of depreciation was used. On December 31, 2019, it was
properly determined that the estimated fair value less cost of disposal was P235,000 while the value in use was
P240,000. On January 1, 2022, the recoverable amount of the asset was P250,000.
4. Assuming the recoverable value on January 1, 2022 to be P330,000, how much is the recovery from
impairment and revaluation surplus, respectively, on January 1, 2022 using the cost model?
a. 120,000; 150,000 b. 120,000; 0 c. 120,000; 30,000 d. 150,000; 0
5. Assuming the recoverable value on January 1, 2022 is P330,000, how much is the recovery from impairment
and revaluation surplus, respectively, on January 1, 2022 using the revaluation model?
a. 120,000; 150,000 b. 120,000; 0 c. 120,000; 30,000 d. 150,000; 0
AUDITING PRACTICE
Significant Business Process: Acquire to Retire (Formerly Investing Cycle)
PROBLEM 1: (COMPREHENSIVE: INITIAL AND BS MEASUREMENT)
Braid Corp. started business on January 1, 2019, by purchasing two equipment having the following list prices:
Equipment A P800,000
Equipment B 750,000
These equipment were acquired under credit term of 10/10, n/30. The company failed to pay within the discount
period. The assets were recorded at the total amount paid. Since the date of purchase, the company has charged
depreciation at 20% on the balance of the asset account at the end of each year. The amount of depreciation
computed on each year has been credited directly to the asset account. Moreover, all purchases since the
inception of the operations have been debited to the equipment account. Cash proceeds from the disposal of
equipment were credited to the same account.
All the Equipment were estimated to have a useful life of 5 years and were supposed to be depreciated under the
straight-line method. Salvage value on all equipment is estimated at 10% of the correct initial cost.
Your first-time audit of the equipment account in 2021 revealed the following information:
• On March 31, 2019, Equipment C was purchased on an installment basis at total installment price of
P1,080,000. The installment contract called for 12 monthly payments of P90,000. The equipment had a
cash price of P850,000. Freight and handling charges including insurance while in transit amounting to
P30,000 was incurred and charged as outright expense. The company recorded Equipment C at the total
installment price.
• On June 30, 2020, Equipment D was purchased by paying P400,000 cash down-payment and issuing
P1,200,000 note payable due at P400,000 annually thereafter. The company incurred P60,000 in
installation cost and is estimated to incur P69,202 in dismantling cost upon its retirement. The market
rate of interest on this date was at 12%. The company recorded the equipment at P1.6M and charged the
installation cost to expense.
• On September 30, 2020, Equipment E was acquired in exchange of a parcel of land located. The equipment
had a fair value of P920,000. The land had a carrying value of P1.4M and a fair market value of P1.5M.
Cash amounting to P580,000 was received from the exchange. Future cash flows related to the assets
exchanged are considered significant. The company recorded the equipment at the book value of the land
given up net of the cash received.
• On March 30, 2021, Equipment B was traded for Equipment F, which had a cash price of P1,050,000. The
company paid P500,000 in the trade-in transaction. The company recorded the trade-in by debiting the
equipment account for the cash payment.
• On July 1, 2021, Equipment C was sold for P500,000. The company incurred cost to sell on the machinery
amounting to P8,000. The equipment account was credited for the net cash received.
Requirements:
1. What is the gain or loss on exchange on September 30, 2020?
2. Assuming that the exchange on September 30, 2020, was considered with no commercial substance, how
much should the equipment be initial recognized and how much is the gain or loss should be recognized?
3. What is the gain or loss on the trade-in on March 30, 2021?
4. What is the gain or loss on the disposal of Equipment C on July 1, 2021?
5. How much is the total depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2021?
6. What is the total carrying value of all the equipment as of December 31, 2021?
Information pertaining to Extraction Corporation’s property, plant and equipment for 2021 is presented below:
The salvage values of the assets are estimated at 10% of cost. All assets were acquired at the beginning of 2016.
Transactions during 2021:
On January 1, the company purchased a new automotive equipment for P800,000 cash and traded-in an old
automotive equipment with an original cost of P500,000. The new car has a cash price of P900,000; market
value of trade-in is not known.
On June 30, a machine with an original cost of P500,000, was totally destroyed by fire. Extraction Corporation
recovered P200,000 from its insurance company.
On July 1, a replacement machinery and equipment were acquired in exchange of 10,000 shares of the company’s
own ordinary shares (P50 par value). The new machinery and equipment had a cash price of P550,000. Additional
costs of P5,000 for freight and P25,000 for installation were incurred.
Requirements:
1. What is the gain or loss on the trade-in on January 1?
2. How much impairment loss should be recognized from the machinery on June 30?
3. What is the correct depreciation expense for 2021 of the following PPE items:
a. Building
b. Machinery and equipment
c. Automotive equipment
4. What is the correct carrying values as of December 31, 2021 of the following PPE items:
a. Building
b. Machinery and equipment
c. Automotive equipment
The Kit Corp. is assessing one of its factories for impairment as of December 31, 2021 due to a competitor
launching a more superior product rivaling the product line being produced by the factory. The factory produces
one of the company’s product lines and is considered a separate cash generating unit from the rest of its other
factories. The assets in the factory included the Land (Cost: P1M); Building (Cost: P6M) and an Equipment (ABC)
(Cost: P2M) which were acquired in January of 2018 (when the product line has been launched). Another
Equipment (DEF) (Cost: P3M) was acquired in January of 2020 (when the product line was expanded). The
building had a useful life of 20 years while the equipment were estimated to have a useful life of 10 years. Assets
are being depreciated under the straight-line method to zero residual value.
Individual cash flows related to each asset comprising the factory cannot be ascertained thus you suggested that
the company treat the factory as a single cash generating unit for the purpose of applying PAS 36, Impairment
of assets. A cash generating unit as defined by the said standards is the smallest identifiable group of assets that
generates cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets or group of assets.
As a result of the introduction of a more superior product by the competitor, the client ascertained that the product
being currently produced by the factory can now only generate cash flows for the company for the next five years,
after which the assets in the factory can be disposed for a total of lump-sum of P1.4M. The following presents the
estimates of the said cash flows (pre-tax):
Seth Company acquired a machine on January 1, 2018, at a cost of P1,500,000. It was expected to have a useful
economic life of 10 years. The comany uses the straight-line method in depreciating its machinery and equipment
and reports on a calendar year basis.
On December 31, 2021, the machine was appraised as having a gross replacement cost of P2,700,000. Seth
applies the revaluation model in valuing this class of property, plant, and equipment after its initial recognition.
Requirements:
1. How much is the depreciation expense in 2022?
2. How much is the balance of the revaluation surplus account on December 31, 2022, assuming that the
company uses the “Piecemeal basis” of transferring the revaluation surplus to retained earnings?
3. What is the carrying value of the machine on December 31, 2022?
4. Assuming that the machinery was sold on December 31, 2023, at P1,400,000, what is the gain or loss to
be recognized in the profit or loss for 2023 and how much revaluation surplus should be transferred as a
“lump-sum” to retained earnings?
5. Assuming that the fair market value of the equipment is P2.45M on December 31, 2021, what is the
balance of the revaluation surplus on December 31, 2022, if the “Piecemeal basis” of transferring the
revaluation surplus to retained earnings is adopted?
On December 31, 2023, the company adopted the revaluation model for its building which has fair market value
of P13.2M as of this date.
Requirements:
1. How much impairment loss is recognized in 2021?
2. How much is the depreciation expense recognized in 2022?
3. How much gain on recovery is recognized in 2023 income statement?
4. How much is the depreciation expense recognized in 2024 under the revaluation model?
5. What is the balance of the revaluation surplus as of December 31, 2024?
6. How much is the depreciation expense recognized in 2024 had the cost model been used in valuing the
property?
Holmes Co. purchased a building on January 1, 2018, for P6,000,000. The same had an expected useful life of
10 years. Straight-line depreciation method is used. On December 31, 2021, the asset was appraised as having
a sound value (depreciated replacement cost) of P5,400,000. On December 31, 2024, as a result of an evidence
of a possible impairment, the asset was tested for possible impairment based on its current recoverable amount
at P1,200,000 with a revised remining useful life of only two years.
Requirements:
1. How much is credited to the revaluation surplus as a result of the revaluation in 2021?
2. What is the correct depreciation to be recognized in 2022?
3. How much is the impairment loss to be recognized for the year ended December 31, 2024?
4. What is the depreciation expense in 2025?
3. When auditing investing cycle related account balances (PPE, Intangibles and other Non-current Assets), the
auditor acknowledges that there is a higher risk of ___________, therefore shall develop an audit program
that shall focus on _______________ assertions.
a. Overstatement; Completeness and valuation
b. Overstatement; Existence, rights and valuation
c. Understatement; Completeness and valuation
d. Understatement; Existence, rights and valuation
4. When auditing current year PPE transactions, the auditor shall request a schedule of property additions for
the year and a schedule of repairs and maintenance expanse for the year. The audit procedure of analyzing
the schedule of property additions is designed primarily to provide evidence in support of the audit proposition
that _________, which is consistent with validating __________ assertion.
a. All expenditures for fixed assets have been recorded in the proper period; Completeness of PPE.
b. All capital expenditures have been properly authorized and are in fact capitalizable under PFRS;
Existence and Rights of PPE.
c. All noncapitalizable expenditures have been properly expensed; Occurrence of Repairs and
Maintenance Expense.
d. All qualified capitalizable expenditures under PFRS for fixed assets have been in fact capitalized;
Completeness of PPE.
5. When auditing current year PPE transactions, the auditor shall request a schedule of property additions for
the year and a schedule of repairs and maintenance expense for the year. The audit procedure of analyzing
the repairs and maintenance accounts is designed primarily to provide evidence in support of the audit
proposition that _________, which is consistent with validating __________ assertion.
a. All expenditures for fixed assets have been recorded in the proper period; Existence & Rights of PPE.
b. All capital expenditures have been properly authorized and are in fact capitalizable under PFRS;
Existence and Rights of PPE.
c. All noncapitalizable expenditures have been properly expensed; Occurrence of Repairs and
Maintenance Expense.
d. All expenditures for fixed assets have been capitalized; Occurrence of Repairs and Maintenance
Expense.
6. In violation of company policy, Red Corp. erroneously capitalized the cost of routinary repairs and
maintenance on factory equipment. The auditor examining Red Corp.’s financial statements would be most
likely detect this when ________. This procedure is designed to audit _______ assertion on PPE.
a. Discussing capitalization policies with the company’s controller; Existence.
b. Examining maintenance expense accounts; Completeness.
c. Physical inspection of factory equipment during ocular inspection; Completeness.
d. Examining the major repairs and overhaul work orders supporting items capitalized during the
year; Existence.
7. Red Corp. misclassified an equipment replacement as repairs expense, this would most likely be detected by
an internal control that provides for:
a. Segregation of duties of employees in the accounts payable department.
b. Independent verification of invoices for disbursements recorded as equipment.
c. Authorization by the board of directors of significant acquisitions.
d. Investigation of variance within a formal capital budgeting system.
8. In testing for unrecorded retirements of equipment, an auditor most likely would ___________. This is
consistent with auditing ____________ assertion on PPE.
a. Select items of PPE from the records and then locate them during the plant tour; Existence.
b. Compare depreciation journal entries with similar prior year entries in search of fully depreciated
equipment; Completeness.
c. Inspect items of equipment observed during the plant tour and then trace them to the equipment
subsidiary ledger; Existence.
d. Scan the general journal for unusual equipment additions and excessive debits to repairs and
maintenance accounts; Completeness.
9. Which procedure would an auditor least likely perform in obtaining evidence about valuation of PPE?
a. Inspecting acquisition documents to support the initial cost of the asset
b. Recomputing the depreciation based on the company’s depreciation policy and ascertaining the
reasonableness of the depreciation policy used.
c. Physical inspection of PPE for possible evidence of physical obsolescence or damage.
d. Confirming ownership and corroborating transactions through inquiries with the management.
10. In testing the reasonableness of the client’s depreciation policy, which of the following will be the least likely
source of evidence?
a. Industry practice in depreciating and amortizing PPE.
b. Schedule of depreciation computation in the past years with prior years PPE roll forward analysis.
c. Subsequent events.
d. Confirming ownership and corroborating transactions through inquiries with the management.
11. In testing reasonableness of a client’s depreciation policy, an auditor may conclude that depreciation charges
maybe have been understated if he or she notes:
a. Large amounts of fully depreciated assets.
b. Continuous trade-ins of relatively new assets.
c. Excessive recurring losses on retired assets.
d. Insured values greatly in excess of book values.
12. The auditor is most likely to seek information from the plant manager with respect to the ____________,
this is relevant for auditing the _____________ assertion for PPE.
a. Adequacy of the provision for depreciation; valuation.
b. Appropriateness of physical inventory observation procedures; existence.
c. Existence of obsolete machinery; valuation.
d. Deferral of procurement of certain necessary insurance coverage; existence.
- END -