PRODUCTION
PRODUCTION
PRODUCTION
PRODUCTION ENGINEERING
“Students are reminded that any file or attachment shared with you by your course lecturer is SOLELY for educational
purposes and/or your personal and private study ONLY, and therefore cannot be shared with or disseminated to
anyone else or uploaded on any website without the permission or authorisation of the copyright owner”.
Objective: Production
test data
• To select the optimum tubing size that can PVT matched
deliver the reservoir target rate and matched
sustain within reasonable time frame of
producing life.
VLP
• To generate a lift curve for reservoir correlation
simulation
Productivity/Injectivity:
• Ability of a well to produce or inject is described as Productivity or injectivity index (i.e. produced or injected
volumes per unit time per differential pressure drop near the wellbore region, bopd/psi).
Drawdown:
• As times goes by, another term which is equally important is well drawdown (Pr - Pwf). The reduction of well
drawdown has brought us to the need of production enhancement and well stimulation.
• Superficially, the lower the Pwf is, the larger production rate would be. However, this situation is not always
desirable.
• Other effects related to lower Pwf:
• Scale, paraffins, asphaltene deposition, water and/or gas coning, sand production.
• Thus, it is important to note that production optimization goal is not just to increase well productivity, but to
also improve the overall asset value while satisfying all physical and financial constraints.
Designing a well model
Inflow Performance Relationship (IPR)
Darcy’s
Law Darcy’s Law for radial flow into a wellbore
Darcy’s
Law What is this expression?
Designing a well model
Inflow Performance Relationship (IPR)
The productivity index (PI) is equal to the flow rate divided by the “drawdown”.
The straight line PI works great for single phase fluid (i.e.
water, oil or water/oil*) flowing into wellbore. But , what
happens if gas “comes out of solution” in the reservoir?
*even though water and oil are two separate phases, they are considered single phase since
thy are both liquid.
Designing a well model
Inflow Performance Relationship (IPR)
• Typically, multiphase will occur during the producing life of a well. Even the Pwf is above Pb, further pressure
decrease will be needed to drive the reservoir fluid to the surface.
• In almost all cases, gas will come out of the solution and more than one phase will coexist during the vertical
lift.
• Free gas may help to lighten the liquid hydrostatic column up to a certain point. But, too much leads to
friction losses.
• In general, multiphase flow deals with the concurrent flow of oil, water and gas in vertical and inclined
pipes.
• In a more complex situation, we can have sands, and solids such as waxes, paraffins and asphaltenes.
• Such cases needed an advanced strategy such as controlling reservoir drawdown, maintaining Pwf and Pwh
above flocculation and injecting chemicals may be necessary to assure flow.
Designing a well model:
Flow through pipes and Outflow Performance
Objective:
Evaluation of
• To choose type of artificial lift system to be used in types of artificial
lift
Detail design
the FDP and the perform detail design of the based on worst
condition
artificial lift system.
Production
optimization
based on the
selected
artificial lift
system
• During the life of a producing field, static reservoir pressure may not be in adequate amount to lift economic
flow-rates through the wellbore and overcome surface pressure restrictions.
• Low production rates are also observed when wellbore fluid gradient increases as a consequence of water
presence form the reservoir.
• Thus, artificial lift is used with the objective to reduce bottom hole flowing pressure, Pwf and increase the flow
rate:
✓ ESP – creates head i.e. delta P to lower the Pwf
✓ Gas lift – reduces fluid column gradient to lower Pwf
✓ PCP – creates head i.e. delta P to lower Pwf
✓ Jet pump – provides pressure drop in venturi to lower Pwf
✓ Rod pump – intermittently sucks fluid from wellbore, thus lowering Pwf
▪ Q: Are all the methods above increase drawdown to produce flow? Y/N
• Selection is many. Decision should be based on the method that most applicable to expected surface
requirement, reservoir fluid and operating conditions.
• Compare the advantages/disadvantages
Objective: Partial
pressure
• To choose suitable material of the for CO2 ,
completion equipment. PVT report H2S
Tubing
stress
analysis
Completion options:
1. Vertical/slanted/ horizontal/multilateral/extended reach – recovery must be justifiable
2. Open hole vs perforated – cost, technical
3. Single zone vs commingled – fluid compatibility, back pressure (thieve zones), water, IOR opportunity?
Features of Features
a single ofstring
a Single String
Completion Completion
are listedare listed below:
below:
- Through -tubingThrough tubing perforation
perforation
can be performed.
Can be performed.
- Packer can be set with x-mas
- Packer can be set with x-mas
tree in place.
Tree in place.
- Reservoir can be isolated and
- Reservoirworkover
can be isolated
operationand can be
Workover done.operation can be
Done. - Downhole measurements can
- Downhole bemeasurements
effectively conducted.
can
- Artificial
Be effectively lift methods as gas
conducted.
- Artificial lift,
lift ESP, etc. can
methods asbe
gasdeployed.
Lift, ESP, etc. Can be deployed.
Completion Strategy and Well architecture
A multiple-string configuration
consists of two or more
completion strings in one well.
• Sand, if not addressed properly can cause a wide range of costly and potentially hazardous problems.
• Sand production accumulating in the tubulars will reduce oil and/or gas production from wells.
• If the well has enough energy to carry the sand to surface, it can cause severe pipe erosion.
• Premature failure of downhole equipment such as ESP, can prove very costly.
• Failure of SSSV can be extremely dangerous.
• Thus, it is important that the potential of sand production is identified before completing the well and
steps are taken to prevent it.
A. Pre-planning:
Before starting to design the completion program, engineer should collect and review :
• The location data, especially the ground and derrick floor elevations
• The casing and wellhead specifications
• The drilling fluid data corresponding to any pay zones (weight, type, losses)
• The drilling highlights (TD, plugback depth, problems, drilling time in production casing, cement tops, well status)
• The core data and geological description of the pay zones
• The pressure data collected in this well and offsets
• The logs and their interpretation, especially the resistivity, density, sonic, gamma ray, and caliper, remembering to
• The data from any dsts, rfts, or kicks
• The casing leakoff tests
• The cementation data on the production casing (pressure, volumes, cement type)
• Any special completion requirements from the geologist or reservoir engineers (required separation of zones, exp
• Any reservoir fluid analysis
• The performance of any offset wells
APPENDIX I
Completion Planning – things to be considered. Not a must-have, but good to know
C. Production reviews:
If the new well (to be completed) is not the only well in the reservoir, completion engineer should ascertain:
• The performance data in the offset wells (rate, watercut, pressure)
• Completions used in the offset wells
• The the production decline curves of the offset wells
• Well test analyses
• The reservoir development plan and drive mechanism (can depletion drive have water breakthrough?
And is the completion were planned to have that?
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION