European Research Studies,

Volume XIV, Issue (2), 2011

“Carolina Herrera” Internationalization Strategy: Democratic

Luxury or Maximum Exclusiveness?

Cristina Calvo Porral1, Domingo Calvo Dopico2

Abstract:

The Company Carolina Herrera has identified a market niche that demands
garments, apparel and accessories and to which it can offer a somewhat differentiated
product with excellent quality. This market niche is the target of several companies such as
Loewe and Vuitton, which may be clearly identified as the leading companies and worldwide
references. In this scenario, the question of which internationalization strategy must be
pursued to access the luxury fashion product market should be raised. A Benchmarking
analysis was carried out for the purpose of identifying best commercial performances of
leading worldwide Brand names to determine the marketing planning strategy. Results show
the companies’ recognition of a globalised luxury and the discovery of a global market niche
with huge growth potential, such as luxury handbags, make us state that there are still
growth opportunities that have not been exploited.

Key Words: Internationalization, Benchmarking, Branding, Fashion Markets

JEL Classification L21, M30, M31

1
University of A Coruna, Faculty of Economics, Spain, email: ccalvo@udc.es
2
University of A Coruna, Faculty of Economics, Spain, email: domingo@udc.es
4 European Research Studies, Volume XIV, Issue (2), 2011

1. Introduction

Carolina Herrera is a fashion Brand name with a renown and quality image.
The company has identified a market niche that demands garments, apparel and
accessories to which it may offer a somewhat differentiated product with excellent
quality. However, this market niche is already targeted by several companies with
very renowned Brand names and great reputation, such as Loewe and Vuitton,
which could clearly be identified as the leading companies and worldwide
references in the luxury fashion apparel sector (Reynolds, 1985). Faced this
scenario, we examine whether there is the possibility of carrying out a complete new
Brand positioning to enter this market niche, or on the contrary, efforts should focus
on strengthening its Brand positioning strategy within an international scope.
To answer this question, Spanish fashion retailer Carolina Herrera’s
(hereinafter CH) internationalization process and strategy are going to be analysed
as a case study. For that purpose, three elements of marketing strategic planning will
be used, such as the Benchmarking, segmentation and positioning and finally the
Marketing-mix, viz., marketing variables that the Company has to reach this
potential market. Because Brand plays a determining role in the firm’s
internationalization and in penetrating international markets (Malhotra, Peterson and
Kleiser, 1999), the role played by Brand as a transmissive vehicle of
internationalization strategy is analysed in this study.

2. The Company’s Beginning, Conceptualization and Internationalization

Process

2.1 The Beginning of the Company and the Carolina Herrera Concept in
Current Context
The European textile and clothing sector is characterized by its fragmented
and disperse production, with great number of small and medium size companies
(Nordas, 2004), whereas textile distribution channels are characterized by their huge
concentration level (Stengg, 2001). In this context, the Company Sociedad Textil
Lonia, S.A, (STL) was launched in 1997, as an industrial project of clothing and sale
of garments, apparel and accessories whose aim is the medium-term development of
several brands in all worldwide markets.
The first brand that STL launched onto the Spanish market in 1998 was
Purificación García, with men and women’s collections, aiming at the market
segment with a medium-high purchasing power and which also demands quality and
design apparel.
On the other hand, fashion designer Carolina Herrera, signed in 2000 a
commercial licensing contract with STL to start up the worldwide expansion of her
firm and planning the inauguration of stores in Europe, the United States, South
America and Asia in the medium term. CH aimed primarily at the market segment
with high purchasing power, offering great quality and exclusive design products.
 “Carolina Herrera” Internationalization Strategy: Democratic
Luxury or Maximum Exclusiveness? 5

Nowadays, the CH brand is the flagship of the company located in Ourense (Spain).
Over a thirteen-year period, STL has opened 305 stores in 23 countries worldwide
and 102 points of sale for the PG Brand in three countries.
The textile Company owns a commercial licensing contract for both brands.
Under this contract, STL is in charge of the global design, tailoring, distribution and
management of the two brands. Control of the overall procedure, including design,
production and distribution is from central headquarters in Ourense.
Due to its business experience and to the abolition of quotas on textile
exports in 2005, the company has reorganized its production process, getting rid of
the tailoring and dressmaking activities. So, following Berkeley and Steuer (2000);
and Keenan, Saritas and Kroener (2004) there is a clear example of product
subcontracting of the labour intensive parts of the production process to third
countries with lower wages costs.

2.2. The Business and Management Model: “One Company, Two Brands”
Dealing with two fashion projects set in different market segments such as
PG and CH has forced the company to lay down two different marketing strategies
for the two brands. The company has tackled possible cannibalization between CH
and PG by differentiating brands, particularly by product, image and target market.
Fashion companies are becoming much more flexible and vertically
organized (Samiee, 1995), and are adopting new technology to increase productivity
and development (Berkeley and Steuer, 2000). In fact, the business strategy
followed by STL lies in its unified, quasi-integrated and global management model,
which provides the company with great control over the production process,
distribution and commercialization, as well as great flexibility and speed in adapting
production to market needs in the short term.
This enables the company to have a large degree of verticalization, meaning
that different stages of the value chain are integrated, such as the design, patterning,
distribution and store management. Its flexible structure, as well as its customer
orientation and the advanced information technologies used, allow a flexible and
swift response to the customers’ demand and excellent market orientation. Even
though it cannot be called a ‘Just-in-time production system’, it does fall into the
quick response system, because it allows a rapid response to changing customer
demands (Castellano, 1993, 2002) and makes the productive and commercialization
system more flexible.
That way, the management method used by the company is quasi-integrated
management of design, production and distribution, which allows adjusting
production to real demand and removing production channel intermediaries. As
remarked on previously, this integrated and global business management model
gives production control to the company. This management model is backed by an
advanced IT system, which every day processes all information from the stores to
central headquarters, which provides daily monitoring of articles sold at each point
of sale.
6 European Research Studies, Volume XIV, Issue (2), 2011

2.3 The CH Brand Internationalization Process: Motives, Market

Selection and Entry Process

2.3.1 The Carolina Herrera Brand’s Internationalization Process

A trend observed in recent decades in the textile, clothing and fashion sector
consists of the sector’s increasing internationalization, as well as the appearance of
new international rivals (Akehurst and Alexander, 1996; Bonache and Cerviño;
1997; Cerviño, 1998; Guillén, 2006).
In this extremely competitive setting, CH opened its first store in Ourense in
2001. International expansion began in 2002 with the inauguration of the Miami
store (USA). In 2010 the company operated in 23 countries and international sales
accounted for 60% of total sales, with the United States and South America by far
the most important markets. The reason for commencing international growth in
North American market was due to the fame fashion designer Carolina Herrera
attained in this market, where she continues with her haute couture company
‘Carolina Herrera New York’. The company continued to expand in Mexico and
South American countries, likewise because of the fame the fashion designer had in
those markets, due to her Venezuelan status.

2.3.2 Internationalization Motives

Previous literature has classified retail internationalization reasons into
‘push’ factors, those that encourage the company to search for international
opportunities, and ‘pull’ factors, those that involve attractive conditions in foreign
markets (Alexander, 1995; Treadgold and Davies, 1988). The limited growth
opportunities in the domestic market had been the main influence in Carolina
Herrera’s international expansion decision. So, as Treadgold (1990) remarked, the
perception of non-existent opportunities in their domestic markets, linked to the
business opportunities perception in new international markets is the most important
motivating factor.
Thus, ‘pull’ or motivating factors for CH are brand awareness in foreign
countries such as the United States or South American countries, uniformity of
consumption patterns throughout the different countries ‘sharing a unique fashion
culture’, the existence of consumer groups that demand design and quality fashion in
different countries and finally, the abolition of barriers to export and import, and the
development of IT.
McGoldrick (1995) and Hutchinson, Alexander, Quinn and Doherty (2007);
contribute with a third group of factors related to company organization, which are
the qualifying or empowering factors. CH’s expansion in New York, specifically the
store on Madison Avenue that opened in 2010 and upcoming openings in Paris and
Tokyo, are only justified on image and status reasons, because these capital cities
are considered ‘fashion capitals’ and are extremely competitive.
Quinn et al. (2009) also mentions the inhibiting factors, that hinder
internationalization. The first stage of internationalization is characterized by
 “Carolina Herrera” Internationalization Strategy: Democratic
Luxury or Maximum Exclusiveness? 7

physical and cultural distance, perceived risk and lack of experience. Administrative
barriers in South American countries (export trade barriers in countries like Mexico,
Colombia, Venezuela or Argentina) and the different season in the Southern
hemisphere in South America were inhibiting factors, as well as the cultural distance
in the Middle East and the geographical distance in Asia.
The notion of physical distance and level of uncertainty a company has to
certain foreign markets have been cited as a critical factor in deciding where to carry
out international expansion (Dupuis and Prime, 1996; Evans, Treadgold and
Movondo, 2000). However, previous research has shown that some retailers
overcome physical barriers due to their products and particularly desirable brands
(Fernie, Fernie and Moore, 2003; Moore, 1998). Many authors have pointed out that
this is the situation of fashion retailers that sell exclusive brands (Laulajainen, 1992;
Lewis and Hawksley, 1990; Moore, 2001).

2.3.3 Market Selection: Disperse Internationalization

Carolina Herrera’s internationalization process in no way follows the classic
‘stages model’ (Cavusgil, 1980; Bilkey and Tesar, 1977; Johanson and
Wiedersheim-Paul, 1975), starting their expansion in closer geographical and
cultural markets, followed by more distant ones. Carolina Herrera carries out what
author Treadgold (1990) calls Disperse internationalization. Thus, the expansion
process began in the United States, a geographically and culturally distant market,
and it was the popularity of the fashion designer in this country that was the key
factor in market choice.
In this first stage of ‘cautious expansion’, between 2002 and 2004, CH
expanded in the North American market, especially in large cities with a large
Hispanic population such as Miami, New York, Las Vegas, San Diego, Houston,
South Coast and Dallas. In 2010 expansion continued with the ‘image’ store opening
on Madison Avenue in New York, which was a strategic company decision to create
brand awareness and international prestige. 2010 also saw the Orlando Outlet
(Florida) open for logistics reasons.
The second stage in the expansion process, in 2005, focused on Mexico,
followed in 2006 and 2007 by the Middle East (Kuwait, Qatar, UAE, Bahrain, Saudi
Arabia and Lebanon). From 2006 to 2009 growth focused on South America:
Panama, Colombia, Venezuela, Aruba, Argentina, Costa Rica, Brazil, while at the
same time point of sales continued to open in new cities in Mexico, like Puebla,
Monterrey, Los Cabos and Cancun.
European expansion began in 2009, starting with London and Warsaw
openings and continued with Paris in 2010. Having overcome the continuous export
barriers in South American countries, the company planned brand expansion in
countries such as the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Chile and Uruguay. It was also
in 2010 when the company attempted to conquer the Asian markets, such as Japan
and China, searching for local partnerships and agreements with commercial
partners well established in this area. The company is now planning to open in cities
8 European Research Studies, Volume XIV, Issue (2), 2011

like Tokyo, Osaka, Seoul, Kuala Lumpur, Hong Kong and Taipei. A summary of the
countries where the company has already entered, as well as chronological
development and the entry method used in each country is shown in Table 1 (Market
Entry Strategies).

Table 1: Market Entry Strategies

Number of stores by type of entry
Year of
Country Type of entry own joint
Establishment corner franchise
store venture
Spain 2001 Own store and 30 75
corner
Portugal 2001 Own store 4 1
USA:
Miami 2002 Own store 1
New York 2003 Own store 1
Woodbury 2003 Own store 1
(Outlet)
Las Vegas 2004 Own store 1
Houston 2004 Own store 1
Dallas 2004 Own store 1
San Diego 2005 Own store 1
Scottsdale 2005 Own store 1
Boca Raton 2004 Own store 1
Orlando 2010 Own store 1
(Outlet)
New York 2010 Own store 1
(Madison Ave.)
Mexico:
Mexico D.F. 2004 Own store and 4 16
corner
Puebla 2004 Own store and 3
corner
Monterrey 2004 Own store and 3
corner
Cancun 2004 Own store and 1 2
corner
Guadalajara 2004 Own store and 3
corner
Los Cabos 2009 Own store 1
(Outlet)
Punta Norte 2009 Own store and 1
corner
Middle East:
UAE (Dubai) 2005 Franchise 4
Kuwait 2006 Franchise 1
Lebanon 2007 Franchise 1
Saudi Arabia 2007 Franchise 1
Qatar 2007 Franchise 1
Bahrain 2007 Franchise 1
 “Carolina Herrera” Internationalization Strategy: Democratic
Luxury or Maximum Exclusiveness? 9

Number of stores by type of entry

Year of
(cont’d) Country Type of entry own joint
Establishment corner franchise
store venture
Central America:
Panama 2007 Franchise 1
Aruba 2008 Franchise 1
Costa Rica 2009 Franchise 1
South America:
Colombia 2008 Franchise 3
Venezuela 2009 Franchise 3
Costa Rica 2009 Franchise 1
Brazil 2009 Franchise 1
Argentina 2009 Franchise 1
Dominican 2010 Franchise 1
Republic
Chile 2011 Franchise 1
Ecuador 2011 Franchise 1
Peru 2011 Franchise 1
Uruguay 2011 Franchise 1
Europe:
United Kingdom 2009 Own store 1
(London)
Poland 2009 Own store 1
France (Paris) 2011 Own store 1
Romania 2011 Own store 1
Czech Republic 2011 Own store 1
Asia:
Turkey (Istanbul) 2011 Franchise 1
Russia 2011 Joint Venture 1
Japan 2011 Joint Venture 1
South Korea 2011 Joint Venture 1
Taiwan (Taipei) 2011 Joint Venture 1
Malaysia 2011 Joint Venture 1
Source: Own elaboration (2010 data).

Carolina Herrera’s international expansion has adopted three different entry

methods. First, its own point of sales or branches. This direct investment strategy is
the most expensive and means high control and risk levels. Carolina Herrera has
adopted this strategy in most European countries, the United States and South
American countries.
The second method is the ‘joint-ventures’. This is a cooperation strategy
that combines ‘know-How’ and foreign company experience with production
facilities, especially in large competitive markets (Gualti, 1995; Jorde and Teece,
1992; Ring and Van de Ven, 1992). This entry strategy is considered for more risky
markets due to geographical and cultural distance, such as Asian countries where
CH is not yet established but planning future openings.
The third and final strategy is the franchise, which is selected for high risk
countries that are culturally distant (Coviello and McAuley, 1999; Flavian and Polo,
10 European Research Studies, Volume XIV, Issue (2), 2011

2000). These include important markets like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait or Central
America countries. The CH franchise follows the same business model as its own
point of sales, meanwhile, the franchisee is responsible for fixed assets investment
and staff recruitment.
Once a decision is taken for entering a specific country, CH follows an
expansion pattern known as ‘oil stain’, a strategy defined by Castellano (2002) as
opening the first store in a strategic area for the company, for the clear purpose of
obtaining information related to this market and gaining experience (Blanco and
Salgado, 2004). An example can be seen with Carolina Herrera, which began its
North American experience in Miami and spent one year learning about customers,
their needs and preferences and a year later, it continued its expansion in New York
City, gradually and slowly expanding throughout the entire territory.

3. Benchmarking and Competition Analysis

3.1 Carolina Herrera’s Rivals on a Worldwide Scale: Loewe and Louis

Vuitton
Company management believes that its main rivals are Loewe and Louis
Vuitton, so we will analyse their commercial and international expansion strategies.

3.1.1 Loewe: History, Commercial and Internationalization Strategy

Loewe, the most emblematic firm in Spanish luxury industry, has belonged
to the Möet Hennessy Louis Vuitton Group since 1996, when the French group,
which pools together different luxury firms, took overall control of the Spanish
company. The French group was trying to strengthen the Loewe foreign
implementation process; because important synergies were obtained with its own
international brands network (Barwise and Robertson, 1992).
In this new stage, Loewe began an image modernization process and
renewed its product line. The goal set by the company was to provide the historic
firm with a more trendy and dynamic image, getting closer to younger customers,
yet protecting the classic Loewe identity and its quality, design and handmade
craftsmanship. With this objective, it launched a more aggressive communication
campaign and started up a new architectural design in the firm’s eighty stores.
The company carried out an optimum resource plan. First it reduced the
number of handbag models, to launch a far more uniform range and to cut expenses,
down from 230 ladies’ handbags in 1996 to around a hundred. Leather goods and
accessories dropped from more than a hundred to little more than sixty and those
models less in demand were removed. The company has revived private fashion
shows to commercialize its catwalk collection. After huge success in Asia, Loewe
launched the ‘Made to Order’ sales formula in the Spanish market in 2008, an
annual leather and furriery collection that is sold at private event presentations.
Regarding its financial results, Loewe failed to make profits in 2008, as a
consequence of reserving funds for the firm’s reorganization plan, recording a total
 “Carolina Herrera” Internationalization Strategy: Democratic
Luxury or Maximum Exclusiveness? 11

loss of 10.53 million euros. Nowadays, the company has a total of 125 own stores
and also sells at a hundred of multi-brand point of sales. We should emphasize that
51.4% of its turnover comes from outside Spain. This is a remarkable difference
with STL, which under no circumstance sells its products in multi-brand stores,
believing that this distribution format loses customer contact and product control.

3.1.2 Loewe Brand Internationalization Process

The new commercial strategy of the company aspires to turn Loewe in a
worldwide benchmark luxury brand for leather articles. The company wants to
develop the Loewe Brand as a global brand and empower its internationalization
based on its strong point, which is leather craftsmanship.
The company's future plan consists of three different operating guidelines.
The first one, a new product policy, reducing the number of models and developing
the men’s prêt-à-porter collection. Furthermore, the company wants to boost fashion
apparel collections in order to endow the company’s prêt-à-porter with prestige and
strengthen it. Another of the company’s lines is the perfumes, where there are
ambitious projects in place, due to their obvious synergies with the LVMH group.
When analysing the company’s product portfolio, we see that in 2009 handbags
accounted for 40% of company sales, followed by accessories and leather articles
that represented 18%. Taking into consideration the company’s turnover, perfumes
are third, totalling 16% this year. Finally, women’s collection accounts for 12% of
turnover and scarves and ties for 9%. Men’s collection only represents 5%.
The company’s second line of action is the ambitious internationalization
plan that involves new store openings in Europe, especially in Germany and France.
In addition, the company plans to approach the North American market, and for that
reason fashion designer Narciso Rodríguez was commissioned in 2007. Finally, the
company expects to approach the South American market in 10 years’ time. Japan is
one of the company’s bulwarks, where the brand has been present for 45 years, and
is its biggest foreign market, with a higher trade volume than the Spanish one.
The outline followed by the company in selecting foreign markets for
internationalization is of particular interest. The first country was Japan in 1965, a
country with outstanding cultural differences with Spain and geographically quite
far-off. The selection of Germany as the second destination market might be
explained by the German origins of the company’s founder and therefore it could be
considered an emotional expansion reason, because Germany is also a market that is
culturally different from Spain (Treadgold, 1990). It would make more sense to
continue international expansion in South America instead of the United States of
America, due to its higher cultural proximity. Data from 2009 are quite significant,
because they reveal that the European market accounts for up to the 45% of total
sales of the company (including the Spanish market), meanwhile the Pacific region
represents 34% of total sales and Japan the remaining 21%.
12 European Research Studies, Volume XIV, Issue (2), 2011

Table 3: Markets where brand Loewe is set up (year 2009)

EUROPE: Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain (29), United Kingdom.
AMERICA: Canada, Colombia, Mexico, United States of America (5).
ASIA: China (14), Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan (41), Korea, Macao, Malaysia, Singapore,
Thailand, Taiwan, Vietnam.
MIDDLE Lebanon, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates (U.A.E.).
EAST: Australia, Guam, New Zealand, Saipan.
OCEANIA:

Source: Own (number of most remarkable countries point of sales).

Finally, an innovation plan. The extremely high quality level of its products
has led the company to manufacture products for other luxury brands such as
Cartier, Escada Piel and Dunhill, due to the high company’s production capacity.
This fact should be highlighted in comparison with STL, which has never
manufactured for other brands, keeping a full control over its designs and products.
Furthermore, the product development strategy, clearly identifying the luxury
leather handbag segment, with excellent quality and a classic design, has been
imitated by CH as well as by PG.

3.1.3 Louis Vuitton: History, Commercial Strategy and

Internationalization Strategy
This company was launched in 1854 as a specialised travel articles brand.
Nowadays, the suitcases, trunks and handbags have become key products of the
company, but the Louis Vuitton brand ranges from garments to accessories. A
decisive step in the company’s expansion process was its introduction into the North
American market, because great Hollywood film stars were loyal brand customers.
 “Carolina Herrera” Internationalization Strategy: Democratic
Luxury or Maximum Exclusiveness? 13

In general, we can state that Louis Vuitton is the very first luxury brand in
the world, a firm that links fashion with tradition. The brand is also owned by the
French group Möet Hennessy Louis Vuitton (LVMH).
This is a company especially sensitive to forgery, putting a ‘zero’ tolerance
policy in place, with constant monitoring in the fight against forgeries. It is the
leading brand in luxury products, and therefore the most forged.
Handbags are the company’s most important product, along with leather
accessories, as these are the most popular items sold. In spite of new trends, classic
icon handbags, like the ‘Speedy’, continue to head the sales figures. In 2009, up to
37% of company’s turnover came from leather accessories and fashion collections.
The company that brought luxury to handbags and suitcases 150 years ago
has a vertical organizational structure: the retail chain controls product distribution
and it defines itself as a ‘retailer’, because it completely controls the distribution
channel. The sale of its products is exclusively through its own point of sales, thus
controlling the customer’s purchasing experience and in fact maintaining brand
control. It does not sell through commercial licences or franchises in any country.
At this point, we find great differences in comparison with STL, especially
in making use of franchise as a way of entering international markets and
particularly in those markets that are distant from the Spanish one. This way, a faster
expansion is achieved by the company; however, the company loses control over the
point of sale and customer contact. On the other hand, STL, as occurred with
Vuitton, has strengthened in the luxury handbag segment by imitating the strategy
followed by its competitors.
It is important to remark that Vuitton is conscious about the fact that the
luxury market is becoming democratic and that luxury and glamour are not only
reserved for a few privileged persons. This situation does not concern the company,
which recognizes that luxury is global and plural nowadays and underlines the brand
emerging markets like China or Brazil (Table 4).
Besides searching for new markets, the company explores new consumer
niches. If traditionally it aimed at women, it is currently beginning to aim at men
and since 2010 the company has been immersed in online store development. This
business development strategy has also been imitated by STL, maybe encouraged by
the success acquired by this purchasing channel at the Spanish company Inditex,
with its Zara Brand.
14 European Research Studies, Volume XIV, Issue (2), 2011

Table 4: Markets with Louis Vuitton brand presence (year 2009)

EUROPE: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Cyprus, Denmark, Finland, France (9), Germany (9),
Greece (3), Hungary, Ireland, Italy (9), Luxemburg, Monaco, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal,
Romania, Russia (3), Spain (6), Switzerland, Sweden, Ukraine, United Kingdom (5).
AMERICA: Argentina, Aruba, Bermuda, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Mexico
(5), Panama, United States of America (36), Uruguay.
AFRICA: Morocco, South Africa.
ASIA: China, Hong Kong, India (3), Indonesia, Japan (28), Korea (9), Macao, Malaysia, Mongolia,
Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan (5), Vietnam.
MIDDLE Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Israel, Kuwait, Lebanon, Qatar, Turkey, United Arab Emirates
EAST: (U.A.E.).
OCEANIA: Australia, Guam, New Zealand.

Source: Own (number of most remarkable countries point of sales).

3.1.4 Benchmarking Analysis Managerial Implications

From this ‘Benchmarking’ analysis we can conclude three important
questions. First of all, as the company Louis Vuitton had already perceived, the
luxury market is going through a democratization process, which fully explains the
intense internationalization and deep expansion processes carried out by the three
companies analysed (Carolina Herrera, Loewe and Louis Vuitton).
In second place, we can comment on the real find of a global market niche,
with huge growth potential, like the luxury handbags segment, which now represents
the highest sales percentage to these companies, moving ahead of fashion
collections.
In third and final place, another issue that merits attention is the brand
extension strategies followed by the companies analysed to other products or items
that complement the fashion collections and handbags, such as perfumes, leather
 “Carolina Herrera” Internationalization Strategy: Democratic
Luxury or Maximum Exclusiveness? 15

articles, and other accessories. In that respect, we find that there are great growth
opportunities as yet unexploited. In Carolina Herrera’s particular case, last year’s
brand extension focused on children’s garment collection, baby articles and jewelry,
for the clear purpose of continuing brand extension to home clothing.

4. Segmentation and Positioning

At an international level, the textile sector is also suffering sweeping

changes and transformations (Cerviño, 1998) and over the last two decades it is
appropriate to highlight three phenomena of huge relevance in the fashion markets.
Firstly, we can mention the ‘democratisation’ phenomenon of the fashion sector
(Mazaira, González and Avendaño, 2003). Thus, huge textile distributors like Zara
or H&M have greatly contributed to this change, offering the latest designs at
affordable prices. However, STL considers itself to be a company that designs,
produces and sells ‘stylish’ products, viz., garments that are not subject to the
vagaries of fashion, which could be the case with Zara, and which require great care
in the quality and details. Secondly, there is an ever greater number of consumers
that want to purchase clothes that lend them a different and original style, but at
reasonable prices. Lastly, there is a trend towards globalisation of markets. Levitt
(1983) describes the appearance of globalised markets and the opportunity to
identify global segments. These new consumers have been referred to as ‘global
consumers’ and possess similarities with people from other countries in terms of
lifestyle and consumption patterns (Hassan, Craft and Kortam, 2003). Based on this
idea Parrish, Cassill and Oxenham (2006), pointed to the importance of
appropriately defining and identifying the segment or strategic niche where
companies from the fashion sector should position themselves.

4.1 Definition of the segment at which the company should target itself
As specified in the previous section, a new group of consumers has arisen in
recent years, with similar preferences, who purchase similar brands and who
communicate globally (Levitt, 1983). These new consumers have been referred to as
global consumers, and possess similarities with people from other countries in terms
of lifestyle and consumption patterns (Hassan et al., 2003). The lifestyle related to
fashion is defined as the attitudes, values and interest of consumers with regard to
purchasing fashion products (Gutman and Mills, 1982; Ko, Kim and Kwon, 2006).
This variable is deemed very important in predicting consumers’ behaviour in
purchasing products and brands. Using this idea, and bearing in mind the global
niche or segment concept, we can define that the segment the CH Brand should
target is characterised by the style and exclusive nature of Carolina Herrera New
York. In fact, the Carolina Herrera CH Brand creates a lifestyle and concept
characterised by a modern image based on values such as elegance, femininity, taste
for detail, cosmopolitanism and design.
16 European Research Studies, Volume XIV, Issue (2), 2011

4.2 Positioning
Carolina Herrera offers a luxury prêt-à-porter collection, with a unique style.
The sales price of its products is three or four times higher than in the medium
segment of the market, and is a further positioning tool of the brand in the market.
To set a sales prices abroad, the company carries out a comparative analysis of its
rivals Vuitton and Loewe, yet always remembering that it is selling a luxury brand
not only targeted at a few, but to a global segment of the market, and therefore can
be considered as a sales price that is accessible for this segment.
This positioning map of the Carolina Herrera Brand and other brands uses
the price and quality attributes. These two attributes are commonly accepted as the
most important ones for this kind of fashion product (Brown and Rice, 1998). While
the price is an objective attribute, quality depends on the subjective perception of the
consumer and is extremely difficult to define (Roger and Lutz, 1990).
The studies reveal the characteristics of a purchaser of the CH brand:
73% are women and the remaining 27% are men, 46% have a high level of
income (with high considered as income of €60,000/year), while 52% have
average income, 89% live in urban areas with more than 100,000 inhabitants
and 68% have a high or medium cultural level.
Figure 2: Positioning matrix of fashion brands (attributes considered: Price and quality)

Democratic Luxury Brands vs. Luxury Brands Fashion accessories

Source: Sociedad Texil Lonia (figures from 2009).
 “Carolina Herrera” Internationalization Strategy: Democratic
Luxury or Maximum Exclusiveness? 17

The product and business lines targeted at the higher segment and the
prestige of the CH Brand have allowed the brand to see a broader horizon, such as
the launch of a line of luxury accessories, which includes handbags, leather goods,
footwear, scarves, ties and costume jewellery. The company has also launched a line
of perfumes and is extending the line of products with the Carolina Herrera
accessories Brand, always targeted at the market segment that demands quality
brand products (Figure 2).

5. Brand Equity Strategy and Marketing-Mix Variables in the Fashion

Products of the Luxury Segment

We will analyse the role of the brand and the key marketing variables. So,
although it is important to position the brand properly and focus it towards a specific
niche or segment in the global market –in our case it would be the luxury and highly
exclusive accessories niche-, management of this will also be important.
Moreover, in the current globalisation process the brand is seen as a
strategic variable of growing importance for internationalisation strategies and
decisions (Cerviño, 2002; Kelz and Block, 1993; Luostarinen and Gabrielsson,
2004) as well as for the creation of greater brand capital. For this brand capital to
acquire the highest value possible for the client, it is essential to have appropriate
management of marketing variables (Holehonnur et al.; 2009; Raggio and Leone,
2009). In this regard, the costs in communication, sales network, PR, packaging and
marketing events are factors that contribute to brand equity (Simon and Sullivan,
1993).

5.1 Product Standardization versus Adaptation and Unique Design

An examination of the benchmarking carried out shows that achieving a
unique design is associated to high exclusivity. This aspect becomes even more
relevant in the case of fashion products and has been highlighted by Moore et al.,
(2000) and Zaichkowsky (2010), whereby personalisation also plays a determining
role. Here, we can state that CH sells a product that to a large extent is uniform for a
global market. However, there are some adaptations to its product offer, because of
the differences in local markets. The clothing sizes of collections in the United
States have been adapted, the colouring of the collection has also been adapted for
the Mexican market. However, we can state that the company does not anticipate the
particularities of each market, but rather has a reactive attitude, modifying the
features of products as an afterthought.
Of note is the fact that the company refuses to use any kind of identification
or association with its Galician or even Spanish heritage (Ghemawat and Nueno,
2003), meaning that the country of origin removes importance from the expression
of the global image.
18 European Research Studies, Volume XIV, Issue (2), 2011

5.2 Distribution: Strategic, Selective Location and Utmost Service

The distribution channel can directly affect brand equity through actions of
support promotion and, indirectly, in the nature of product associations. Moreover,
the distribution channel plays a determining role in achieving an exclusivity image.

5.2.1 Setting and Location of the Store

The image of the point of sale has been considered as one of the most
important determining factors in the distributor's success (Amirani and Gates, 1993).
Consumers’ perceptions about retail stores are formed quickly and unthinkingly
(Oxenfeld, 1974; Sewell, 1974) and this is why the atmosphere inside a point of sale
is a key factor when it comes to influencing the decision-taking process (Birtwistle
and Shearer, 2001; Greenberg et al., 1983). In addition, studies suggest that
consumers tend to mentally abstract the information on image attributes such as
style, trends, range of products and reputation or notoriety of the distributor
(Boulding, 1956; Newman, 2003).
We can state that CH has great potential as it focuses very carefully on its
points of sales, carefully checking every detail of the décor and furniture of the
stores, which are renewed every so often to bring them up to date. Another of the
key elements of the point of sale is the location. The top designers from France,
Italy, United Kingdom and, to a lesser extent, the USA, which head the list of luxury
brands, have chosen London as the first worldwide reference centre to launch their
luxury brands onto the international stage. This data strengthens the theory of the
importance of the utmost exclusivity in positioning a luxury fashion brand.

5.2.2 Customer Service

Service, which includes relations with sales staff, is an essential part of the
distributor's image, and promotes favourable emotions and feelings in consumers
(Bitner, 1992; Mattila and Wirtz, 2001). As highlighted previously, personal
treatment enables value to be added to the end product (Berman and Evans, 1992),
which confirms the importance of the store’s service as a hugely important factor in
supplying greater value-added.

5.3 The Price

The prices of CH garments vary from country to country, and it is the
Spanish and Portuguese markets where the lowest prices can be found, while prices
in international markets are generally higher due to the logistics expenses. Prices are
set in accordance with a market focus strategy and bearing in mind the position
chosen by the brand. This means that certain articles such as handbags and
accessories are never put in the sales. In the case of fashion, price promotions are an
effective marketing tool for sales but have a negative influence on perceptions of
quality (Tong and Hawley, 2009), and they communicate negative product
association (Blattberg and Neslin, 1990).
 “Carolina Herrera” Internationalization Strategy: Democratic
Luxury or Maximum Exclusiveness? 19

5.4 Communication
Communication plays a vital role in the creation of brand equity (Biel,
1993).We can state that companies like Vuitton or Loewe have followed the brand
alliance strategy with designers and celebrities. However, there are notable
differences between them, because while Loewe pursues a brand alliance with a
renowned designer like Narciso Rodríguez to strengthen its brand, for its latest
advertising campaigns Vuitton has opted to recruit global celebrities with a high
worldwide impact, yet not directly related to the world of fashion, such as Mijail
Gorvachev, Francis Ford Coppola, Bono or Sean Connery. Studies reveal that the
support from celebrities, used properly, plays a very valuable role in development of
brand equity and in increasing its competitive position in the market (Till and
Shimp, 1998).
The different means of advertising reveal different effects and strengths in
the creation of brand equity. While television as a communication media has
penetrated most households and is the most popular communications media among
consumers (Liu, 2002), printed advertising, especially in magazines, is an effective
communication media for fashion brands and products. However, CH conducts very
little advertising on TV and press and relies on the store, together with PR, as the
core communication tool.

6. Implications and Conclusions

Below we synthesise the main business implications and conclusions as a

result of analysing this case. We have followed the logical order presented
throughout the case.

6.1 Management Model

The business strategy pursued by STL lies in its unified, quasi-integrated
and global business management model, which provides the company with great
control over the process of production, distribution and marketing, as well as huge
flexibility and agility to adapt production to market needs in a short period of time.
So, the company has a large degree of verticalisation, which enables it to
integrate different stages of the value chain such as design, patterning, and delivery
at points of sale, distribution and store management. Its flexible structure, as well as
client focus and the use of advanced IT technologies, enable a rapid and flexible
response to consumer demand and very good market orientation. Although we
cannot say this is a just-in-time production system, it does fall within the quick
response system, as it enables a quick response to changing demands of consumers
and gives flexibility to the productive and marketing system.

6.2 Management Model

Four fundamental issues can be concluded from this benchmarking analysis.
Firstly, luxury and glamour are not reserved for the elite or a few privileged persons,
20 European Research Studies, Volume XIV, Issue (2), 2011

and they implicitly recognise, with their internationalisation plans, that nowadays
luxury is globalised, understanding that there is a worldwide market niche that
requires exclusive and high-quality products. In this regard we should point to the
emergence of new markets for these brands such as China or Brazil, economies with
high growth rates and which represent very important markets. However, it is
appropriate to point out that luxury, understood as the utmost exclusivity, must not
be confused with democratic luxury. Brands like Hermés, Armani or Gucci are for
the elite and not for the masses.
Secondly, we can highlight the discovery by the three companies analysed
of a global market niche, with huge growth potential, such as luxury handbags,
which now represent the highest percentage of sales for these companies, ahead of
the fashion collections. There is logic to this fact, given that both Loewe and Vuitton
started out by manufacturing articles of leather and luxury briefcases and handbags,
before subsequently developing the collections.
Thirdly, another issue that merits attention is the strategy of brand extension
pursued by the companies analyzed towards other products or goods that
complement fashion collections and handbags, such as perfumes, leather goods or
accessories. Here, we understand that there are still growth opportunities that have
not been exploited.

6.3 Segmentation and Positioning

Variables like exclusivity, design, service quality and location and format of
the point of sale -as mentioned previously- are key factors in developing a luxury
fashion brand. In addition to these variables, brand positioning is also extremely
important. Recent research (Moore et al., 2000) has suggested that there are two
fundamental aspects to creating a real luxury brand identity: i) its capacity to create
a specific lifestyle; and ii) not everybody that aspires to a specific brand can afford
it. This data strengthens the theory of the importance of the utmost exclusivity in
positioning a luxury fashion brand.
A fundamental element in positioning of luxury brands is the store location
and setting. Thus, through merchandising and an innovative design, certain flagships
(the discreet setting of an Armani store or the elegance of Gucci) have created a
distinct brand. Analogously, the location must respect the criteria of utmost
exclusivity.

6.4 Brand Strategy and Comprehensive Management of Marketing-Mix

Variables
6.4.1 Diversification of the Brand Portfolio, Range Extension and Global
Niches
To deal with the spread of demand and a greater increase in demand for
designer brands, we propose the formula of diversification and definition of
segments or global market niches. We propose creating new brands with products
that are less expensive than the main brand or line as well as extending the brand
 “Carolina Herrera” Internationalization Strategy: Democratic
Luxury or Maximum Exclusiveness? 21

towards new product categories that must be targeted at a different segment (e.g.
Emporio Armani).

6.4.1 Diversification of the Brand Portfolio, Range Extension and Global

Niches
To deal with the spread of demand and a greater increase in demand for
designer brands, we propose the formula of diversification and definition of
segments or global market niches. We propose creating new brands with products
that are less expensive than the main brand or line as well as extending the brand
towards new product categories that must be targeted at a different segment (e.g.
Emporio Armani).

6.4.2 Comprehensive Management of the Marketing-Mix Variables

The brand requires comprehensive management of the marketing-mix
variables. Thus, the product or collection, packaging and even fashion events must
be based on the fundamental values on which the brand is supported.
Given all these criteria, we can conclude that the position put forward by the
company in order to compete directly with brands like Prada, Armani or Gucci is
desirable in the long-term but would lack sense as things stand today, due to the
absence of any highly exclusive brand image, definition of a specific lifestyle and
the need to foster the distribution strategy by creating exclusive places and settings
that are far more innovative. Therefore, the strategy to strengthen the company's
position in international markets and position in the democratic luxury market is
more consistent at the current time.

References

1. Alexander, N. (1990), “Retailers and International Markets: motives for Expansion”,

International Marketing Review, Vol.7 No. 4, pp. 75-85.
2. Alexander, N. (1995), “Internationalisation: interpreting the motives”, in McGoldrick,
P.J. and Davies, G. (Eds.), International Retailing: Trends and Strategies, Pitman, London,
pp. 77-98.
3. Amirani, S. and Gates, R. (1993), “An attribute-anchored conjoint approach measuring
store image”, Internacional Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 2 No. 5,
pp. 30-39.
4. Barwise, P. and Robertson, T. (1992), “Brand Portfolios”, European Management
Journal, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 277-285.
5. Berkeley, N. and Steuer, N. (2000), “Comparative analysis of EU and nacional trends in
the textile and clothing industry”, available at: www.stile.coventry.ac.uk/adapt (accesed
April 2006).
6. Berman, B. and Evans, J. (1992), Retail Management: A Strategic Approach, McMillan,
New York, NY.
22 European Research Studies, Volume XIV, Issue (2), 2011

7. Biel, A. (1993), “Converting image into equity”, in D.A Aaker and A.L. Biel (Eds.),
Brand Equity and Advertising: Advertising’s Role in Building Strong Brands, Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 67-82.
8. Bilkey, W. and Tesar, G. (1977), “The export behaviour of smaller-sized Wisconsin
manufacturing firms”, Journal of Internacional, Business Studies, Vol. 8, pp. 93-98.
9. Birtwistle, G, Clarke, I., and Freathy, P. (1998), “Customer decision making in fashion
retailing: a segmentation analysis”, International Journal of Retail and Distribution
Mangement, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 147-54.
10. Birtwistle, G. and Shearer. L. (2001), “Consumer perception of five UK fashion
retailers”, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 9-18.
11. Bitner, J. (1992), “Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customer
and Employees”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 56, pp. 57-71.
12. Blanco, X.R. and Salgado, J. (2004), Amancio Ortega, de cero a Zara: el primer libro
de investigación sobre el imperio Inditex, La esfera de los libros, Madrid.
13. Blattberg, R. and Neslin, S. (1990), Sales Promotion: Concepts, Methods and Strategies,
Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
14. Bonache, J. and Cerviño, J. (1996), “Caso Zara: El Tejido Internacional”, in J.J. Duran
(Ed.), Multinacionales Españolas I: Algunos Casos Relevantes, Pirámide, Madrid, pp. 51-
86.
15. Bonache, J. and Cerviño, J. (1997), “Cortefiel: un proceso internacional de innovación y
aprendizaje organizativo”, in J.J. Duran (Ed.), Multinacionales Españolas II: Nuevas
Experiencias de Internacionalización, Pirámide, Madrid, pp. 163-214.
16. Boulding, K.E. (1956), “The Image: Knowledge in Life and Society”, The University of
Michigan Press, East Lansing, MI.
17. Brown, P. and Rice, J. (1998), “Ready-to-wear: Apparel Analysis”, 2nd edit.,
Merill/Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
18. Brown, S. and Burt, S. (1992), “Conclusion-Retail Internationalisation: Past Imperfect,
Future Imperative”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 26 No. 8 / 9, pp. 80 -84.
19. Castellano, J. M. (1993), “Una ventaja competitiva: el factor tiempo. El caso Inditex-
Zara”, Papeles de Economía Española, Vol. 56, pp. 402-404.
20. Castellano, J.M. (2002), “El proceso de internacionalización de Inditex”, Información
Comercial Española, Vol. 799, pp. 209-17.
21. Cavusgil, S. (1980), “On the internationalisation process of the firm”, European
Research, Vol.8, No. 6, pp. 273-81.
22. Cerviño, J. (1998), “Las empresas de distribución de productos de confección: Un caso
de proyección internacional”, Distribución y Consumo, Vol. 8, No. 38, pp. 50-67.
23. Cerviño, J. (2002), Marcas Internacionales: cómo crearlas y gestionarlas, Ed. Pirámide,
Madrid.
24. Coviello, N. and McAuley, A. (1999), “Internationalisation and the smaller firm: a
review of contemporary empirical research”, Management International Review, Vol. 39,
No. 3, pp. 223-256.
25. Crawford, L. (2000), “Management fashion retailing”, Financial Times, 26 September,
2000.
26. D’Andrea, G. and Arnold, D. (2003), “Zara”, Harvard Business School Press,
Cambridge, MA.
27. Dupuis, M. and Prime, N. (1996), “Business distance and global retailing: a model for
analysis of key success and failure factors”, International Journal of Retail and
Distribution Management, Vol. 2 No. 11, pp. 30-38.
28. Evans, J., Treadgold, A., and Movondo, F. (2000), “Psychic distance and the
performance of international retailers: a suggested theorical framework”, International
Marketing Review, Vol. 17 No. 4/5, pp. 373-391.
29. Fabrega, F. (2004), Zara: El modelo de negocio de Inditex, Claves de gestión, Madrid.
 “Carolina Herrera” Internationalization Strategy: Democratic
Luxury or Maximum Exclusiveness? 23

30. Fernie, J, Fernie, S., and Moore, C. (2003), Principles of Retailing, Butterworth
Heinemann, Oxford.
31. Flavian, C. and Polo, Y. (2000), “Inditex (1994-1999)”, in J.L Munuera and A.I.
Rodríguez (Eds.), Estrategias de marketing para un crecimiento rentable. Casos prácticos,
ESIC, pp. 133-161.
32. Ghemawat, P. and Nueno, J. (2003), “Zara: Fast fashion”, Harvard Business School
Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 703–497.
33. Greenberg, C., Sherman, E., and Schiffman, L. (1983), The measurement of fashion
image as a determinant of store patronage”, in W.R. Darden and R.F. Lush. (Eds.),
Patronage Behaviour and Retail Management, North-Holland, New York, pp. 151-163.
34. Gualti, R. (1995), “Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The implications of Repeated ties for
contractual choice in Alliances”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.38, No.1, pp. 85-
112.
35. Guillén, M. (2006), El auge de la empresa multinacional española, Ed. Marcial Pons
and Fundación Rafael del Pino, Madrid.
36. Gutman, J. and Mills, M.K. (1982), “Fashion life style, self-concept, shopping
orientation and store patronage: an integrative analysis”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 58, No.
2, pp. 64-86.
37. Hassan, S., Craft, S. and Kortam, W. (2003), “Understanding the new bases for global
market segmentation”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 20 No. 5, pp. 446-462.
38. Hollander, S.C. (1970), “Who are the multinational retailers?”, in S.C. Hollander (Ed.),
Multinational Retailing, Michigan State University Press, MI, USA, pp. 14-53.
39. Holehonnur, A., Raymond, M.A., Hopkins, C.D., and Fine, A.C. (2009), “Examining
the customer equity framework from a consumer perspective”, Journal of Brand
Management, Vol. 17, pp. 165-180.
40. Hutchinson, K., Alexander, N., Quinn, B., and Doherty, A.M. (2007),
“Internationalization Motives and Facilitating Factors: Qualitative Evidence from Smaller
Specialist Retailers”, Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 96-122.
41. Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J.E. (1977), “The internationalisation process of the firm: A
model of knowledge development and increasing foreign commitments”, Journal of
International Business Studies, Vol. 8, pp. 23-32.
42. Johanson, J. and Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1975), “The internationalisation of the firm:
four Swedish case studies”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 12, pp. 305-322.
43. Jorde, T. and Teece, D. (1992), “Innovation, Cooperation and Antitrust”, in T. Jorde,
and D. Teece (Eds.), Antitrust, Innovation and Competitiveness, Oxford University Press,
pp. 47-55.
44. Keenan, M P., Saritas, O., and Kroener I. (2004), “A dying industry or not? The future
of the European textiles and clothing industry”, Foresight, Vol.6 No. 5, pp. 313-322.
45. Kelz, A. and Block, B. (1993), “Global Branding: Why and How”, Industrial
Management and Data, Vol. 93 No. 4, pp. 11-17.
46. Klein, S. and Roth, V.J. (1990), “Determinants of export channel structure: the effects of
experience and psychic distance revisited”, International Marketing Review, Vol. 7 No.5,
pp. 27-38.
47. Ko, E., Kim, K., and Kwon, J. (2006), “Impact of fashion online community
characteristics on brand royalty: comparisons among lifestyle groups”, Journal of Korean
Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 87-106.
48. Laulajainen, R. (1992), “Louis Vuitton Malletier: a truly global retailer”, Annals of the
Japanese Association of Economic Geographers, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 15-70.
49. Levitt, T. (1983), “The globalization of markets”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 6, pp.
92-102.
50. Lewis, B.R. and Hawksley, A.W. (1990), “Gaining competitive advantage in fashion
retailing”, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 18, No. 4,
pp.5-18.
24 European Research Studies, Volume XIV, Issue (2), 2011

51. Liu, W.L. (2002), “Advertising in China: product branding and beyond”, Corporate
Communications, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 117-126.
52. Luostarinen, R. and Gabrielsson, M. (2004), “Finnish perspectives of international
entrepreneurship”, in L.P. Dana (Ed.), Handbook of research on international
entrepreneurship, Edward Elgar Publishing, UK, pp. 383-403.
53. Malhotra, N.K., Peterson, M., and Kleiser, S.B. (1999), “Marketing Research: A State-
of-the-Art Review and Directions for the Twenty-First Century”, Journal of the Academy
of Marketing Science, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 160-183.
54. Martínez, J.A. (1997), “Jose María Castellano”, Economistas, Vol. 73, pp.118-126.
55. Mattila, A. and Wirtz, J. (2001), “Congruency of scent and music driver of in-store
evaluations and behavior”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 77, pp. 273-89.
56. Mazaira, A., González, E. and Avendaño, R. (2003), “The role of market orientation on
company performance through the developent of sustainable competitive advantage: the
Inditex-Zara case”, Marketing Ingelligence and Planning, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 220-229.
57. McGoldrick, P.J. (1995), “Introduction to international retailing”, in P.J. McGoldrick
and G. Davies (Eds.), International Retailing: Trends and Strategies, Pitman, London, pp.
1-14.
58. Moore, C. (1998), “La mode sans Frontiers: the internationalisation of fashion
retailing”, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 345-356.
59. Moore, C.M., Fernie, J., and Burt, S. (2000), “Brands without boundaries – the
internationalisation of the designer retailer’s brand”, European Journal of Marketing,
Vol.34, No. 8, pp. 919-937.
60. Newman, A. (2003), “Some manipulable elements of the service setting and their impact
on company image and reputation”, International Journal of New Product Development
and Innovation Management, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 287-304.
61. Nordas, H.K. (2004), “The global textile and clothing industry post the agreement on
textiles and clothing”. Discussion papers, No.5. (Accessed in April 2006) Available at:
http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/discussion_papers5_e.pdf,
62. Oxenfeld, A. (1974), “Developing a favourable price-quality image”, Journal of
Retailing, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 8-14.
63. Parrish, E.D., Cassill, N.L. and Oxenham, W. (2006), “Niche market strategy in the
textile and apparel industry”, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, Vol. 10 No.
4, pp. 420-432.
64. Quinn, B., Hutchinson, K., Alexander, N., and Doherty, A.M. (2009), “Retailer
internationalization: overcoming barriers to expansion”, The International Review of
Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 251-272.
65. Raggio, R. and Leone, R. (2007), “The theorical separation of brand equity and brand
value: Managerial Implications for strategic planning”, Brand Management, Vol. 14 No. 5,
pp. 380-395.
66. Reynolds, C. (1985), Couture: The Great Fashion Designers, Thames and Hudson,
London.
67. Ring, P. and Van de Ven, A. (1992), “Structuring cooperative relationships between
organizations”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 13, pp. 483-498.
68. Roger, J. and Lutz, S. (1990), “Quality indicators used by retail buyers in the parchase
of women’s sportsvear”, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, Vol.9, No.1, pp.11-17.
69. Samiee, S. (1995), “Strategic considerations in European retailing”, Journal of
International Marketing, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 49-76.
70. Sewell, S. (1974), “Discovering and improving store image: an introductory summary”,
Journal of Retailing, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 3-9.
71. Simon, C. and Sullivan, W. (1993), “The measurement and determinants of Brand
Equity: A Financial Approach”, Marketing Science, Vol. 12, pp. 28-52.
 “Carolina Herrera” Internationalization Strategy: Democratic
Luxury or Maximum Exclusiveness? 25

72. Stenng, W. (2001), “The textile and clothing Industry in the EU: A survey”, Enterprise
Papers, Vol. 2. European Commission, Brussels.
73. Till, B. and Shimp, P. (1998), “Endorsers in advertising: the case of negative celebrity
information”, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 67-82.
74. Tong, X. and Hawley, J. (2009), “Creating Brand Equity in the Chinese clothing
market”, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 566-581.
75. Treadgold, A. (1990), “The Developing Internationalisation of Retailing”, International
Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 4-11.
76. Treadgold, A. and Davies, R. (1988), The Internationalisation of Retailing, Oxford
Institute of Retail Management, Longman, London.
77. Wheaty, J. and Chiu, J. (1977), “The effect of price, store image and product and
respondent characteristics on perceptions of quality”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.
4, pp.181-186.
78. Zaichkowsky, J.L. (2010), “Strategies for distinctive brands”, Brand Management, Vol.
17, No. 8, pp. 548-560.
26 European Research Studies, Volume XIV, Issue (2), 2011