Continuum Damage Mechanics Model For Damage Assessment and Strength Prediction in Laminated Composite Structures
Continuum Damage Mechanics Model For Damage Assessment and Strength Prediction in Laminated Composite Structures
Continuum Damage Mechanics Model For Damage Assessment and Strength Prediction in Laminated Composite Structures
(2022) 22:633–647
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-022-01346-4
TECHNICAL ARTICLE—PEER-REVIEWED
Submitted: 12 September 2021 / in revised form: 9 January 2022 / Accepted: 11 January 2022 / Published online: 12 February 2022
Ó ASM International 2022
123
634 J Fail. Anal. and Preven. (2022) 22:633–647
progress through the model into other elements in the mesh composites under general loads and boundary conditions
as the load is increased, but the damage within a particular for which no analytical solution is available. The contin-
element is modeled as a step function: either undamaged or uum damage model used here is based on previous work by
damaged. An additional damage evolution law called the the authors [7, 8, 21]. The main aim of the continuum
Continuum Damage Mechanics (CDM) Method available damage model is presented below.
in ANSYS. In this model, damage variables increase Constitutive model:
gradually based on energy amounts dissipated. Damage can The proposed definition for the complementary free
therefore progress within an element as well as throughout energy density of a ply is given in Eq. 1
the mesh. r211 r222 m12
Intra-ply damage modes have been investigated pri- G¼ þ r11 r11
2ð1 d1 ÞE1 2ð1 d2 ÞE2 E1
marily within the Continuum Damage Mechanics (CDM)
r212
[7–9]. In contrast, delamination has been studied exten- þ þ ða11 r11 þ a22 r22 ÞDT
2ð1 d6 ÞG12
sively using interface fracture modeling techniques such as
þ ðb11 r11 þ b22 r22 ÞDM ðEq 1Þ
cohesive zone models and virtual crack closure techniques
(VCCT) [10, 11]. The transverse strength of 90 plies The damage variable d1 is associated with longitudinal
located in cross-ply laminates subjected to transverse ten- (fiber) failure, d2 is the damage variable associated with
sion is investigated by numerical analysis [12]. The impact transverse matrix cracking, and d6 is the damage variable
of the layer thickness and the presence of micro tubes on related to longitudinal and transverse cracks. b11 and b22
the in situ strength of the 90° layer and the influence of are the coefficients of hygroscopic expansion in the
induced delamination on the strength of [0/90n/0] laminates longitudinal and transverse directions, respectively. DT
in micro and macro scales is investigated [13]. The effects and DM are the differences in temperature and moisture
of matrix crack formation on the properties of composite content concerning the corresponding reference values.
laminates subjected to bending loads, are studied analyti- The coefficients of thermal expansion of a ply are also
cally using a crack density-based model [14]. The affected by the failure mechanisms. The exact dependence
progressive damage formation in open-hole laminated of the coefficients of thermal expansion with damage can
composites subjected to axial tensile and compressive be obtained for simple laminates in the absence of stress
loading using a constitutive model is investigated [15]. A gradients [22]. The strain tensor is equal to the
new Integrated Micro-Macro (IMM) approach is proposed complementary free energy density derivative concerning
to consider the impact of debonding and its induced ma- the stress tensor as given in Eq. 2.
trix-cracking on the macro response of composite oG
laminates [16] Despite these advances in progressive e¼ ¼ H : r þ aDT þ bDM ðEq 2Þ
or
damage modeling, [17–20] have suggested that CDM
models for ply failure, coupled with cohesive zone models The lamina compliance tensor can be represented as in
for delamination, have difficulty accurately representing Eq. 3
2 1 3
laminate failure sequences that exhibit strong coupling
2 ð1d1 ÞE1 mE121 0
oG 6
between transverse matrix-cracking and delamination.
H ¼ 2 ¼ 4 E121
m 1
ð1d2 ÞE2 0 7 5 ðEq 3Þ
The present work investigates the mechanical responses or 1
0 0 ð1d6 ÞG12
of continuous fiber-reinforced composites by modifying
and extending the available micromechanical framework. Intra-laminar Damage:
A significant part of the work conducted involves analyz- The continuum damage mechanics model implemented
ing the effective damage responses due to damage to simulate intra-laminar damage is available for elements
evolutions of matrix micro cracks and fiber breakages. with a plane stress formulation and is intended to predict
elastic-brittle materials that show no appreciable plastic
deformation before failure. Four failure modes, including
Continuum Damage Mechanics Model fiber tension, fiber compression, matrix tension and matrix
compression, are considered and are represented sepa-
Strength-based failure criteria are commonly used in the rately. The most important among the proposed criteria is
finite element method to predict failure events in composite Hashin’s criterion [23] assumes a quadratic interaction
structures. Many continuum-based standards have been between the stresses acting on the fracture planes. Initiation
derived to relate stresses and experimental measures of of damage, which refers to the onset of damage at a
material strength to the onset of failure. Continuum dam- material point, is based on Hashin’s theory.
age mechanics (CDM) is a methodology well suited for the
simulation of damage evolution and ultimate failure of
123
J Fail. Anal. and Preven. (2022) 22:633–647 635
The failure criteria included in the present work analyses failure modes in each ply and apply the corresponding
are those proposed by Hashin and are summarized. Matrix reduction in material stiffness.
Failures in tension and compression occurs due to a com-
bination of transverse stresses, r22, and shear stresses, s12.
The failure index defined in terms of these stresses and the Methodology
strength parameters. Failure occurs when the index exceeds
unity. The methodology for designing high-performance struc-
The Hashin Criteria for the four different failure modes tures of composites is still evolving. In recent years,
are described in Eqs. 4-7 as follows: ‘‘virtual testing’’ has increased in use to try new materials
Fiber tension ðr11 0Þ in structures earlier in an applications timeline. Virtual
r 2 s 2 testing is made possible by conducting progressive damage
11 12
Fft ¼ þa L ðEq 4Þ analysis and combining those results to predict struc-
XT S
ture/component safety based on the physics and
Fiber compression ðr11 0Þ micro/macro mechanics of materials, manufacturing pro-
r 2
11 cesses, available data and service environments. The
Ffc ¼ ðEq 5Þ
XC approach takes progressive damage and fracture processes
Matrix tension ðr22 0Þ into account and accurately assesses reliability and dura-
r 2 s 2 bility by predicting failure initiation and progression based
22 12
Fmt ¼ þ L ðEq 6Þ on constituent material properties. Such approaches are
YT S becoming more widespread and economically advanta-
Matrix compression ðr22 0Þ geous in some applications.
" #
r 2 Y C 2 r22 s12 2
Evaluation of progressive damage technique requires a
c 22
Fm ¼ þ 1 þ L ðEq 7Þ definition of linear elastic orthotropic material and three
2ST 2ST YC S material models: Damage initiation criteria, Damage evo-
lution law and Material strength limits—selection criterion
In the above equations, rij are the components of the
for tensile, compressive failure and fiber and matrix. Cri-
effective stress tensor, and XT and XC are the longitudinal
teria include Maximum strain, Maximum stress, Puck,
tensile and compressive strengths, YT and YC are the
Hashin, LaRc03, LaRc04. User can also define up to 9
tensile and compressive strengths in the matrix direction,
user-defined criteria. Damage evolution defines how the
and SL and ST denote the longitudinal and transverse shear
material degrades following the initiation of damage. Set-
strengths. The coefficient a in Eq. 4 determines the shear
ting TBOPT = 1 sets the evolution law to the Material
stress contribution to the initiation of fiber tensile failure.
property degradation method (MPDG), which models
Once a damage initiation function is satisfied, the
instant stiffness reduction. The input to this law is the
associated damage variable is different from zero and
instant reduction factors for tensile and compressive stiff-
further loading will cause degradation of the material
ness in both tension and compression. The values can range
stiffness coefficients.
between 0 (no damage) and 1 (complete damage).
The stiffness matrix of a damaged ply is defined as in
Setting TBOPT = 2 sets the evolution law to the con-
Eqs. 8 and 9
tinuum damage mechanics method (CDM), which models
r ¼ Cd e ðEq 8Þ gradually increasing damage. The input to this law is the
2 3
ð1 d1 ÞE1 ð1 d1 Þð1 d2 Þm21 E2 0 energy dissipated per unit area and the viscous damping
14 5
Cd ¼ ð1 d1 Þð1 d2 Þm12 E2 ð1 d2 ÞE2 0 coefficient for each damage mode (8 constants total). The
D
0 0 ð1 d6 ÞG12 D damping coefficients are used to help overcome conver-
ðEq 9Þ gence difficulties that can occur for softening the material.
The Hashin failure criterion must be selected in the TB,
The damage evolution laws for the damage variables are
DGMI command.
defined in terms of the fracture energy dissipated during the
The values of the ply elastic properties are shown in
damage process. Methods for determining the fracture
Table 1. E1, E2 are the longitudinal and transverse Young’s
energies are provided in [24]. The damage evolution laws
need to ensure that the computed energy dissipated is
independent of the mesh. The energy dissipated for each Table 1 IM7/8552 Material Stiffness Properties
damage mechanism is regularized using the crack-band E11(GPa) E22 (GPa) G12 (GPa) m12
model. The failure analysis must be able to predict the
171.33 9.07 5.27 0.32
123
636 J Fail. Anal. and Preven. (2022) 22:633–647
modulus, respectively, G12 is the shear modulus, and m12 is neighboring layers. To measure the components of the
the major Poisson’s ratio. The ply strengths are shown in fracture toughness, double cantilever beam (DCB) [2] and
Table 2. Xt and Yc are the longitudinal and transverse four points bending end notched flexure (4-ENF) tests were
tensile strengths, respectively. Yt and Yc are the longitu- performed. The continuum damage mode l(CDM) also
dinal and transverse compressive strengths, respectively. S requires the fracture energies per unit surface for longitu-
is the in-plane shear strength. This input is used to define dinal failure, G1? (tension) and G1- (compression).
the maximum stresses or strains that a material can sustain Energies dissipated per unit area (Gc) represents fracture
before damage occurs. The values to be input is based on toughness. Standard tests are used to obtain these values.
the damage initiation criterion selected. The strengths are These energies measured using the Compact Tension (CT),
calculated using the models proposed by the previous and Compact Compression (CC) tests proposed by Pinho
authors [4], based on mode I fracture toughness G2?, and et al. [25, 26]. The measured fracture energies per unit
on the mode II fracture toughness, G6 [6]. These models surface areas are shown in Table 3.
use the simplified assumption that the in situ strengths are The open-hole tension (OHT) specimen was studied
not a function of the geometry and elastic properties of the experimentally and computationally by P P Camanho, P
Maimi and C G Davila [27]. The progressive damage
analysis for the standard benchmark problem [9] of open-
Table 2 IM7/8552 Material Strength Properties
hole tension specimen was conducted in ANSYS using the
XT (MPa) XC (MPa) YT (MPa) YC (MPa) S (MPa) continuum damage mechanics model to represent the intra-
2325.6 1199.7 62.0 199.7 92.4 laminar damage modes (e.g., transverse matrix-cracking
and fiber failure) and cohesive elements to capture
delamination ply interfaces. The progressive damage
analysis of OHT specimens was carried out to quantify the
Table 3 IM7/8552 Fracture Energies (kJ/m2) size effect to validate the numerical model [9]. Good
G1C? (fiber) G1C- (fiber) G1C (matrix) G1IC (matrix) agreement was arrived between results from experimental
and numerical simulations. This agreement showed the
80.82 105.4 0.275 0.781
validity of the model. In quasi-isotropic laminates, Hexcel
IM7-8552 CFRP is considered as a ply material with a
Fig. 1 Typical FE model of Composite Plate [±45/02/90]s with Rectangular Cut-out, (a) Longitudinal cut-out, (b) Transverse cut-out
123
J Fail. Anal. and Preven. (2022) 22:633–647 637
(Fibre
Tension)
`-450 ply
(Fibre
Tension)
0
0 ply
(Fibre
Tension)
0
90 ply
(Matrix
Tension)
stacking sequence of [90/0/±45]3s. Specimens with five between the working and reference temperatures used to
different hole diameters d = 2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm, 8 mm, 10 evaluate the residual thermal stresses were -155°C. In the
mm and a width to diameter ratio w/d = 6 are considered numerical analysis of progressive damage of notched
for the numerical studies. Further, the analysis has been laminate Shell181 elements are used to model 10-layer
extended to the problem of rotorcraft composite structures [±45/02/90]s composite laminate is considered. Thermal
for the investigation of the damage behavior by intra- and mechanical loading via applied displacements is
laminar and inter-laminar failure mechanisms. applied to capture the damage accumulation using appro-
priate failure criteria.
The structural response of the laminate with five dif-
Problem Statement ferent ratios of cut-out width to plate width (b/W = 0.1, b/
W = 0.2, b/W = 0.3, b/W = 0.4, b/W = 0.5) for a given a/
In the present work, the analyses have been carried out to W=0.5 is studied. From the numerical studies it is clearly
the problem of a composite plate containing rectangular/ observed that the effect of cut-out size on ultimate strength
square cut-outs under uniaxial tension (Fig. 1) for the can be explained using continuum damage model. Tables 4
investigation of the damage behavior by intra-laminar and and 5 illustrates the contour plot of Progressive Damage of
inter-laminar failure mechanisms. The typical FE model composite plate with Longitudinal cut-out and Transverse
proposed is illustrated in Fig. 1(a&b) is created using four- cut-out, respectively. The failure stresses are evolved in a
node structural shell element SHELL 181. The difference coupled manner before final failure. For all geometries,
123
638 J Fail. Anal. and Preven. (2022) 22:633–647
(Fibre
Tension)
-450 ply
(Fibre
Tension)
00 ply
(Fibre
Tension)
00 ply
(Matrix
Tension)
there are several damage processes which influences the The geometry of rectangular composite plate with a
state of stress is illustrated in Tables 6 and 7. square/rectangular cut-out is shown in Fig. 4.
Figures 2 and 3 show the plot of the total reaction force The influence of cut-out size (d//b ratio) as well as
versus the applied displacement applied to the notched composite ply layup sequence on the ultimate failure load
composite plate [±45/02/90]s predicted using the consti- of a rectangular composite plate with a square/rectangular
tutive model proposed. The slope of the reaction force over cut-out is shown in Fig. 5.
the applied displacement curve decreases as the applied Hashin failure criterion is used to predict the ultimate
displacement increases. It is also observed that the laminate failure load in this analysis. Figure 4 indicates that the
with longitudinal rectangular cut-out the strength increases ultimate load decreases when the cut-out size increases,
by 25% compared to the laminate with transverse rectan- i.e., b/W ratio increases. For the composite plate [0/90]4s,
gular cut-out. The stress-strain behavior of laminate under as the cut-out size increases from b/W=0.1 to 0.2, 0.3 and
reaction force due to applied displacement was linear 0.4, the reduction in ultimate failure load is 12%, 39% and
elastic until first ply failure. From the typical load-deflec- 52%, respectively. From the Figure 4, it is also observed
tion curve it can be observed that the displacements are that, as the cut-out size increases from d/b=0.1 to 0.2, 0.3
evaluated, and the failure loads are predicted. The stress- and 0.4, the reduction in ultimate load is different for dif-
strain behavior of laminate under uniaxial tensile loads was ferent stacking sequences.
linear elastic until breakage and the slope of the total It can be seen that, [0/90]4s composite plate is stronger
reaction force over the applied displacement curve. Sub- than [0/?45/-45/90]2s, [75/-60/30/-15]2s, [-45/45]4s, [15/-
sequently, the behavior of laminate was nonlinear until 75]4s, [30/-60]4s composite plates. [0/90]4s composite
final failure occurred. This trend was observed for in both plate is strongest and [30/-60]4s composite plate is weakest
cut-out configurations. Table 8 shows illustration of stress than other analyzed laminated composite plates. Strength
distribution predicted by the model. The effects of cut-out of [0/90]4s composite plate is 12.6 times of the strength of
size d//b ratio (for b=00) with different ply configurations [30/-60]4s composite plate. [0/90]4s composite plate is
of the composite plate with a square/rectangular cut-out on 10.16, 5.18, 1.68 and 1.60 stronger than [-45/45]4s, [15/-
the ultimate failure load are further investigated. 75]4s, [0/?45/-45/90]2s and [75/-60/30/-15]2s, respectively.
123
J Fail. Anal. and Preven. (2022) 22:633–647 639
450 Ply
-450 Ply
00 Ply
900 Ply
123
640 J Fail. Anal. and Preven. (2022) 22:633–647
450 Ply
-450 Ply
00 Ply
900 Ply
123
J Fail. Anal. and Preven. (2022) 22:633–647 641
Fig. 2 Plot of the total reaction force vs. the applied displacement Fig. 4 Geometry Model
applied to the composite plate with Longitudinal cut-out (a/W=0.5)
Composite Material Modeling for Stress Analysis
of Rotor Blade
123
642 J Fail. Anal. and Preven. (2022) 22:633–647
GENOA MS-PFA for simulation under centrifugal, lead- carried out to assess the stress induced in the main rotor
lag, flap and torsion as a combined loading. Figures 7 and 8 blade with effect of ply-drop-off, and features at the
show more details about a typical section of the model, reduced skin thicknesses along the root end span.
total thickness map, offsets and all sections for the model. Figures 9 and 10 shows overall damage mechanisms for
The computational modeling approach is followed to the main rotor blade root end. They are split up into matrix
assess the damage and static strength from rotor loading by shear, matrix compression, matrix tension and fiber failure.
considering the effects of material variability to assess When a damage occurs, material degradation softens the
structural advantages of main rotor blade under service region and prevents other damages from happening. Here
loads. A micromechanics based multi-scale modeling matrix tension and shear seem to have prevented much
approach that detects damage and fracture evolution is matrix compression from happening. Figure 9 shows
123
J Fail. Anal. and Preven. (2022) 22:633–647 643
123
644 J Fail. Anal. and Preven. (2022) 22:633–647
123
J Fail. Anal. and Preven. (2022) 22:633–647 645
Fig. 10 Ply Damages in 176 plies for Fiber Failure (S11T) and Matrix Tensile Failure (S22T)
Fig. 11 Deformation of Rotor Blade Fig. 12 Normal Stress in fiber direction (s11)
matrix tension and fiber failure damages side by side within stress s12. The intra-laminar failure modes considered are
176 layers. Figure 11 shows the deformed behavior of rotor (i) Fiber failure in tension and compression (ii) Matrix-
blade. cracking in tension and compression. The stresses are
Figures 12, 13 and 14 shows the stress distribution, in computed in the principal material directions for each ply
fiber direction r11, matrix direction r22 and in-plane shear orientation and are used in the unidirectional failure
123
646 J Fail. Anal. and Preven. (2022) 22:633–647
References
123
J Fail. Anal. and Preven. (2022) 22:633–647 647
12. R. Alireza, M. Hamidreza, F. Amin, H. Miguel, In situ strength 20. E.V. Iarve, D. Mollenhauer, R. Kim, Theoretical and experi-
analysis of cross-ply composite laminates containing defects and mental investigation of stress redistribution in open hole
interleaved woven layer using a computational micromechanics composite laminates due to damage accumulation. Compos. A
approach. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 44(5), 1225–1240 Appl. Sci. Manuf. 36, 163–171 (2005)
(2021) 21. Maimı, P., Camanho, P. P., Mayugo, J. A., Davila, C. G. (2006)
13. F. Amin, M. Hamidreza, N. Mohsen, R. Alireza, A.T. Seyed, H. A thermodynamically consistent damage model for advanced
Miguel, Micromechanical investigation of cross-ply carbon composites. NASA Technical Memorandum 214282, National
composite laminates with glass microtubes using CZM and Aeronautics and Space Administration
XFEM. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 27, 1–3 (2021) 22. R. Joffe, A. Krasnikovs, J. Varna, COD-based simulation of
14. F. Amin, B. Mohammad, B. Ramzan, Predicting the matrix transverse cracking and stiffness reduction in (S/90n)s laminates.
cracking formation in symmetric composite laminates subjected Compos Sci Technol. 61, 637–656 (2001)
to bending loads. Compos. Struct. 223, 110945 (2019) 23. Z. Hashin, Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites. J.
15. F. Amin, B. Ramzan, Development of an integrated micro macro Appl. Mech. 47, 329–334 (1980)
model for anticipating matrix cracking evolution and fiber 24. G. Catalanotti, P.P. Camanho, J. Xavier, C.G. Dávila, A.T.
breakage in the laminated composite containing an open hole. Marques, Measurement of resistance curves in the longitudinal
Eng. Fract. Mech. 211, 161–179 (2019) failure of composites using digital image correlation. Compos.
16. B. Ramzan, F. Amin, Predicting the debonding formation and Sci. Technol. 70, 1986–1993 (2010)
induced matrix cracking evolution in open-hole composite lam- 25. Pinho, S. T. (2005) Modelling failure of laminated composites
inates using a semi-consequence micro-macro model. Compos. using physically-based failure models, PhD thesis. Department of
Struct. 210, 274–293 (2019) Aeronautics, Imperial College London, UK,
17. Mabson, G., Lyle, R.D., Dopker, B., Hoyt, D.M., Baylor, J.S., and 26. S.T. Pinho, P. Robinson, L. Iannucci, Fracture toughness of the
Graesser, D.L. (2007) Fracture interface elements for static and tensile and compressive fibre failure modes in laminated com-
fatigue analysis. 16th International Conference on Composite posites. Compos Sci Technol. 66, 2069–2079 (2006)
Materials. Kyoto, Japan 27. P.P. Camanho, P. Maimı́, C.G. Dávila, Prediction of size effects
18. F.P. van der Meer, L.J. Sluys, Continuum models for the analysis in notched laminates using continuum damage mechanics.
of progressive failure in composite laminates. J. Compos. Mater. Compos. Sci. Technol. 67(13), 2715–2727 (2007)
40, 2131–2156 (2009)
19. F.P. van der Meer, C. Oliver, L.J. Sluys, Computational analysis Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to
of progressive failure in a notched laminate including shear jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
nonlinearity and fiber failure. Compos. Sci. Technol. 70(4), 692–
700 (2010)
123