Chapter 04 Test Bank
Chapter 04 Test Bank
Countries with strong shareholder protection tend to have more valuable stock markets and more companies listed on stock exchanges per capita
than countries with weak protection.
True
False
References
2. Award: 1.00 point
the economic, legal, and institutional framework in which corporate control and cash flow rights are distributed among shareholders,
managers and other stakeholders of the company.
the general framework in which company management selects and monitors the Board of Directors.
the rules and regulations adopted by boards of directors specifying how to manage companies.
References
3. Award: 1.00 point
References
References
5. Award: 1.00 point
The genius of public corporations stems from their capacity to allow efficient sharing or spreading of risk among many investors, who can buy and sell
their ownership shares on liquid stock exchanges and let professional managers run the company on behalf of shareholders. This risk sharing stems
from
References
6. Award: 1.00 point
In a public company with diffused ownership, the board of directors is entrusted with
References
References
8. Award: 1.00 point
the large number of shareholders ensures strong monitoring of managerial behavior because with a large enough group, there's almost
always someone who will to incur the costs of monitoring management.
most shareholders will have a strong enough incentive to incur the costs of monitoring management.
a "free rider" problem discourages shareholder activism and few shareholders have a strong enough incentive to incur the costs of
monitoring management.
References
9. Award: 1.00 point
the conflicts of interest between shareholders and managers are worse than in countries with diffuse ownership of firms.
the conflicts of interest are greater between large controlling shareholders and small outside shareholders than between managers and
shareholders.
the conflicts of interest are greater between managers and shareholders than between large controlling shareholders and small outside
shareholders.
References
In what country do the three largest shareholders control, on average, about 60 percent of the shares of a public company?
United States
Canada
Great Britain
Italy
References
11. Award: 1.00 point
References
12. Award: 1.00 point
References
References
14. Award: 1.00 point
In theory,
managers are hired by the shareholders at the annual stockholders meeting. If the managers turn in a bad year, new ones get hired.
managers are hired by the board of directors; the board is accountable to the shareholders.
References
15. Award: 1.00 point
a typical board of directors often has relatively few outside directors who can independently and objectively monitor the management.
managers of one firm often sit on the boards of other firms, whose managers are on the board of the first firm. Due to the interlocking
nature of these boards, there can exist a culture of "I'll overlook your problems if you overlook mine."
all of the options have been true to a greater or lesser extent in the recent past.
References
English common law countries, such as Canada, the United States, and the U.K.
socialized firms.
References
17. Award: 1.00 point
References
18. Award: 1.00 point
is especially prevalent in such countries as the United States and the United Kingdom, where corporate ownership is highly diffused.
is especially prevalent in such countries as Italy and Mexico, where corporate ownership is highly concentrated.
References
In the United States, managers are legally bound by the "duty of loyalty" to
the shareholders.
the bondholders.
the government.
References
20. Award: 1.00 point
In the United States, managers are bound by the "duty of loyalty" to serve the shareholders.
References
21. Award: 1.00 point
concentrated ownership of the company is more the exception than the rule.
diffused ownership of the company is more the exception than the rule.
References
would specify exactly what the manager will do under each of all possible future contingencies.
References
23. Award: 1.00 point
the rights or control to make decisions under contingencies that are not specifically covered by complete contracts
the portion of the complete contract that deals with future contingencies forseen
neither the rights or control to make decisions under contingencies that are not specifically covered by complete contracts or the portion
of the complete contract that deals with future contingencies forseen
both the rights or control to make decisions under contingencies that are not specifically covered by complete contracts and the portion of
the complete contract that deals with future contingencies forseen
References
24. Award: 1.00 point
Why is it rational to make shareholders "weak" by giving control to the managers of the firm?
This may be rational when shareholders may be neither qualified nor interested in making business decisions.
This may be rational since many shareholders find it easier to sell their shares in an underperforming firm than to monitor the management.
This may be rational to the extent that managers are answerable to the board of directors.
All of the options are explanations for the separation of ownership and control.
References
a firm's funds in excess of what's needed for undertaking all profitable projects.
References
26. Award: 1.00 point
The investors supply funds to the company but are not involved in the company's daily decision making. As a result, many public companies come to
have
References
27. Award: 1.00 point
self-interested managers as principals and shareholders of the firm who are the agents.
altruistic managers as agents and shareholders of the firm who are the principals.
self-interested managers as agents and shareholders of the firm who are the principals.
dutiful managers as principals and shareholders of the firm who are the agents.
References
adopt anti-takeover measures for their company to ensure their personal job security.
waste company funds by undertaking unprofitable projects that benefit themselves but not shareholders.
All of the options are potential abuses that self-interested managers may be tempted to visit upon shareholders.
References
29. Award: 1.00 point
Suppose in order to defraud the shareholders, a manager sets up an independent company that he owns and sells the main company's output to this
company. He would be tempted to set the transfer price
References
30. Award: 1.00 point
Suppose in order to defraud the shareholders, a manager sets up an independent company that he owns and buys one of the main company's inputs
of production from this company. He would be tempted to set the transfer price
References
Managers are in the best position to decide the best use of those funds.
These funds are needed for undertaking profitable projects and the issue costs are less than new issues of stocks or bonds.
Managers may not be acting in the shareholders best interest, and for a variety of reasons, want to use the free cash flow.
References
32. Award: 1.00 point
Managerial entrenchment efforts are clear signs of the agency problem. They include
anti-takeover defenses.
poison pills.
changes in the voting procedures to make it more difficult for the firm to be taken over.
References
33. Award: 1.00 point
In high-growth industries where companies' internally generated funds fall short of profitable investment opportunities,
References
References
35. Award: 1.00 point
Governance mechanisms that exist to alleviate or remedy the agency problem include:
References
References
Morck, Shleifer, and Vishny (1988) studied the relationship between managerial ownership share and firm value for Fortune 500 U.S. companies. The
results of their analysis suggested that the first turning point (the first vertical, dashed line between X and Y) is reached at __________ percent and
the second turning point (the second vertical, dashed line between Y and Z) at about __________ percent, respectively.
5; 25.
15; 50.
50; 75.
References
38. Award: 1.00 point
LBOs involve managers or buyout partners acquiring controlling interests in public companies, usually financed by partners' equity.
Concentrated ownership and low levels of debt associated with LBOs are the mechanism for solving the agency problem.
LBOs improve a company's free cash flow and this is the mechanism by which they can solve the agency problem.
LBOs involve managers or buyout partners acquiring controlling interests in public companies (usually financed by heavy borrowing), and
concentrated ownership and high levels of debt associated with LBOs are the mechanism for solving the agency problem.
References
Tobin's Q is
the ratio of the market value of company assets to the replacement costs of the assets.
a means to find overvalued stocks: If Q is high it means that the cost to replace a firm's assets is greater than the value of its stock.
the ratio of the market value of company assets to the replacement costs of the assets, as well as a means to find overvalued stocks: If Q is
high it means that the cost to replace a firm's assets is greater than the value of its stock.
References
40. Award: 1.00 point
invests in stocks of a company for the explicit purpose of influencing the company’s management
References
41. Award: 1.00 point
wish to persuade the companies to make commitments to corporate social responsibilities, including increasing gender and ethnic
diversity on the board of directors
pursue their social and political agenda by promoting changes in companies’ environmental, social, and governance practices.
both A and B
References
It is important for society as a whole to solve the agency problem, since the agency problem
References
43. Award: 1.00 point
References
44. Award: 1.00 point
are compelled by law to abide by the Code of Best Practice on corporate governance.
References
legally charged with looking after the interests of stakeholders (e.g., workers, creditors, etc.) in general, not just shareholders.
References
46. Award: 1.00 point
boards of directors are legally responsible for representing the interests of the shareholders.
due to the diffused ownership structure of the public company, management often gets to choose board members who are likely to be
friendly to management.
there is a correlation between underperforming firms and boards of directors who are not fully independent.
References
47. Award: 1.00 point
In the United States, it is not uncommon for the same person to serve as both CEO and chairman of the board.
This situation must not have much conflict of interest since it is common.
This is only legal if that individual owns a controlling number of shares in the firm.
References
Suppose you are the CEO of company A, and you serve on the board of company B, while the CEO of B is on your board.
This is normal and even a desirable situation since it allows for efficient information sharing between the firms.
References
49. Award: 1.00 point
as public firms improve their corporate governance, the stock price goes up.
References
50. Award: 1.00 point
The board of directors may grant stock options to managers. These are
call options.
put options.
References
managers will set aside the accounting goal if it conflicts with the goal of maximizing shareholder wealth.
managers will be unable to manipulate the GAAP, so shareholders can be confident of having their wealth maximized.
References
52. Award: 1.00 point
References
53. Award: 1.00 point
it is important for the board of directors to set up an independent compensation committee that can carefully design the contract and
diligently monitor manager's actions.
senior executives can be trusted to not abuse incentive contracts by artificially manipulating accounting numbers since the auditors should
look in to that.
the presence of any incentive is enough, whether it is accounting based or stock-price based.
the board of directors should always give the managers a "heads I win, tails you lose" type of option.
References
is normal in the United States, following the well-publicized scandals of recent years.
is relatively rare in the United States and common in many other parts of the world.
leads to a free-rider problem with the minority shareholders relying on the majority shareholders to assume an undue burden in monitoring
the management.
References
55. Award: 1.00 point
can be an effective way to alleviate the agency problem between shareholders and managers.
References
56. Award: 1.00 point
is to reduce the information symmetry between corporate insiders and the public.
is to reduce the information asymmetry between corporate insiders and the public, as well as discourage managerial self-dealings.
References
Accounting transparency
can only be achieved when managers commit to serving on their own audit committee.
occurs when the accounting department has translucent cubicles for their workers.
promises to reduce the information asymmetry between corporate insiders and the public.
References
58. Award: 1.00 point
While debt can reduce agency costs between shareholders and management,
this does not work for firms in mature industries with large cash reserves.
References
59. Award: 1.00 point
While debt can reduce agency costs between shareholders and management,
excessive debt may also induce the risk-averse managers to engage in extra risky investment projects, causing an underinvestment
problem.
with debt financing, companies cannot misuse debt to finance corporate empire building.
excessive debt may also induce the risk-averse managers to forgo profitable but risky investment projects, causing an underinvestment
problem. Additionally, with debt financing, companies can misuse debt to finance corporate empire building.
References
debt can be a stronger mechanism than stocks for credibly bonding managers to release cash flows to investors.
equity dividends can be a stronger mechanism than bonds for credibly bonding managers to release cash flows to investors.
preferred stock dividends can be a stronger mechanism than bonds for credibly bonding managers to release cash flows to investors.
References
61. Award: 1.00 point
Debt can reduce agency costs between shareholders and management, but
only to the extent that the firm can commit all of its free cash flow.
debt is best used as a corporate governance mechanism by young companies with limited cash reserves.
References
62. Award: 1.00 point
Companies domiciled in countries with weak investor protection can reduce agency costs between shareholders and management
References
This decision provides their shareholders with a higher degree of protection than is available in Italy.
This may make investors both in Italy and abroad more willing to provide capital and to increase the value of the pre-existing shares.
References
64. Award: 1.00 point
are illegal.
reinforce the notion that managers can take their control of the company for granted.
References
65. Award: 1.00 point
In many countries, hostile takeovers are relatively rare. This is so partly because of
concentrated ownership in these countries, as well as cultural values and political environments disapproving hostile corporate takeovers.
References
References
67. Award: 1.00 point
makes a tender offer to the target shareholders at a price substantially less than the prevailing share price.
makes a tender offer to the target shareholders at the prevailing share price.
makes a tender offer to the target shareholders at a price substantially exceeding the prevailing share price.
References
68. Award: 1.00 point
Suppose the managers of a company have driven the stock price down because they have spent the investors' money on lavish perquisites like golf
club memberships.
This situation may prompt a corporate raider to buy up the shares of the firm in a hostile takeover.
If the hostile takeover is successful, the managers will probably lose their jobs in the ensuing restructuring.
If the restructuring is successful, the corporate raider can sell his shares at a profit.
References
References
70. Award: 1.00 point
English common law countries tend to provide a stronger protection of shareholder rights than French civil law countries because
the former countries tend to protect property rights better than the latter.
the former countries tend to have more separation of power than the latter.
References
71. Award: 1.00 point
Many companies issue shares with differential voting rights, deviating from the one-share one-vote principle.
By accumulating superior voting shares, investors can acquire cash flow rights exceeding control rights.
The price of the voting shares is usually twice the price of the voting shares.
By accumulating superior voting shares, investors can acquire control rights exceeding cash flow rights.
References
Studies show that the quality of law enforcement, as measured by the rule of law index, will tend to be
higher in French civil law countries than in English common law countries.
higher in English common law countries than in Scandinavian civil law countries.
highest in Scandinavian civil law countries and German civil law countries.
References
73. Award: 1.00 point
Suppose Mr. Lee and his relatives hold 30 percent of shares outstanding of Samsung Life, which in turn holds 20 percent of Samsung Electronics.
What is the cash flow right of the Lee family in Samsung Electronics?
50 percent
10 percent
20 percent
6 percent
References
74. Award: 1.00 point
Italy.
the U.K.
the U.S.
Australia.
References
References
76. Award: 1.00 point
a shareholder controls a holding company that owns a controlling block of another company, which in turn owns controlling interests in yet
another company, and so on.
equity cross-holdings among a group of companies, such as keiretsu and chaebols, can be used to concentrate and leverage voting rights
to acquire control.
a combination of these schemes may also be used to leverage control in a pyramidal ownership structure.
References
77. Award: 1.00 point
What is the difference between control rights and cash flow rights?
Since all shareholders benefit only from pro-rata cash flows, control rights and cash flow rights are the same thing.
Large investors may be able to derive private benefits from control, thus control rights can exceed cash flow rights.
Cash flow rights are more important than control rights since the only reason to invest in anything is to generate cash.
References
The key to extracting private benefits of control that are not shared by other shareholders on a pro rata basis is to
become a large shareholder and acquire control rights exceeding cash flow rights.
References
79. Award: 1.00 point
The voting premium, defined as the total vote value (value of a vote times the number of votes) as a proportion of the firm's equity market value is only
about 2 percent in the United States and 36 percent in Mexico, suggesting that in Mexico,
dominant shareholders overpay and thus fail to extract substantial private benefits.
References
80. Award: 1.00 point
they will pay small premiums for voting shares over nonvoting shares.
they will pay moderate premiums for voting shares over nonvoting shares.
they will pay substantial premiums for voting shares over nonvoting shares.
they will not pay substantial premiums for voting shares over nonvoting shares.
References
Price per share paid for the control block – the exchange price after the control transaction
the exchange price after the announcement of the control transaction
Price per share paid for the control block – the exchange price after the control transaction
price per share paid for the control block
the exchange price after the control transaction – price per share paid for the control block
price per share paid for the control block
Price per share paid for the control block – the exchange price after the control transaction
the exchange price prior to the announcement of the control transaction
References
82. Award: 1.00 point
"block premium," the difference between the price per share paid for a control block of shares versus the exchange price of regular shares.
the difference in value between non-voting shares and voting shares or "block premium," the difference between the price per share paid
for a control block of shares versus the exchange price of regular shares.
References
83. Award: 1.00 point
References
Financial development enhances the efficiency of investment allocation through the monitoring and signaling functions of capital markets.
References
85. Award: 1.00 point
Comparing the U.S. with the German and Japanese corporate governance systems,
References
86. Award: 1.00 point
Strengthen the protection of outside investors from expropriation by managers and controlling insiders.
References
strengthen the protection of outside investors from expropriation by managers and controlling insiders.
provide taxpayer financing for corporate raiders to strengthen the discipline of the marketplace.
References
88. Award: 1.00 point
In the U.S., corporate governance reform has included all of the following except
References
89. Award: 1.00 point
the company should appoint independent financial experts to its audit committee.
both CEO and CFO sign off on the company's financial statements.
References
References
91. Award: 1.00 point
has had the consequence that many foreign firms have de-listed in the U.S. exchanges and listed their shares on the London Stock
Exchange and other European exchanges.
has increased the pace of foreign firms listing their shares in the U.S.
has increased the pace of foreign firms listing their shares in the U.S. and has also had the consequence that many foreign firms have de-
listed in the U.S. exchanges and listed their shares on the London Stock Exchange and other European exchanges.
References
92. Award: 1.00 point
is a small amount, since most firms were playing by rules to begin with.
References
One implication of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act is that companies must appoint independent "financial experts" to their committees. Which of the major
components is associated with this objective?
Accounting regulation
Audit committee
Executive responsibility
References
94. Award: 1.00 point
accounting regulation: The creation of a public accounting oversight board charged with overseeing the auditing of public companies, and
restricting the consulting services that auditors can provide to clients.
audit committee: The company should appoint independent "financial experts" to its audit committee.
internal control assessment: Public companies and their auditors should assess the effectiveness of internal control of financial record
keeping and fraud prevention.
executive responsibility: Chief executive and finance officers (CEO and CFO) must sign off on the company's quarterly and annual financial
statements. If fraud causes an overstatement of earnings, these officers must return any bonuses.
References
95. Award: 1.00 point
the positions of CEO and chairman of the board should not reside in the same individual.
compliance is mandatory for public corporations, optional for listed non-public corporations.
References
some foreign firms have chosen to list their shares on the London Stock Exchange and other European exchanges, instead of U.S.
exchanges, to avoid the costly compliance.
the pace of foreign firms listing their shares in the U.S. has increased.
References
97. Award: 1.00 point
The major components of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act include all of the following except
accounting regulation: The creation of a public accounting oversight board charged with overseeing the auditing of public companies, and
restricting the consulting services that auditors can provide to clients.
audit committee: The company should appoint independent "financial experts" to its audit committee.
shareholder voting rights reform: "One share one vote" is now the law of the land.
executive responsibility: CEOs and CFOs must sign off on the company's financial statements.
References
98. Award: 1.00 point
in 1933.
in 2010.
References
The Cadbury Code has not been legislated into law, and compliance with the code is voluntary.
However, the London Stock Exchange (LSE) currently requires that each listed company show whether the company is in compliance with
the code and explain why if it is not.
This "comply or explain" approach has apparently persuaded many companies to comply rather than explain.
Currently, 90 percent of all LSE-listed companies have adopted the Cadbury Code.
References
100. Award: 1.00 point
Following the adoption of the Cadbury Code of Best Practice joint CEO/COB positions declined
References
101. Award: 1.00 point
joint CEO/COB (chief executive officer and chairman of the board) positions declined.
there has been a significant impact on the internal governance mechanisms of U.K. companies.
CEOs have become more sensitive to company performance, strengthening managerial accountability and weakening managerial
entrenchment.
References
Even though compliance with the Cadbury Code of Best Practice is voluntary,
the Cadbury Code has made a significant impact on the internal governance mechanisms of U.K. companies.
the job security of U.K. chief executives has become more sensitive to the company performance, strengthening managerial accountability
and weakening its entrenchment.
joint CEO/COB (chief executive officer and chairman of the board) positions declined.
References
103. Award: 1.00 point
The key requirements of the Cadbury Code of Best Practice state that
the positions of CEO and chairman of the board must be the same individual.
boards of directors should include at least three outside directors and the positions of CEO and chairman of the board should not reside in
the same individual.
References
104. Award: 1.00 point
The key requirements of the Cadbury Code of Best Practice state that
the compensation, nominating, and audit committees to be entirely composed of independent directors.
the positions of CEO and chairman of the board should not reside in the same individual.
References
In May 2018, the U.S. congress passed a new law called the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection act that significantly
weakened which previous Act?
References