G02 CM133L Experiment6
G02 CM133L Experiment6
G02 CM133L Experiment6
1CM133L/A21, School of Chemical, Biological and Material Engineering and Science, Mapua University
ABSTRACT
Separating an organic component from a mixture of chemicals is important. A chemical process called extraction entails
dissolving the combination in the first solvent and adding a second immiscible solvent to dissolve one of the mixture's
components only. The two layers are then aggressively mixed to enable the transfer of a dissolved component from one layer
to the other. The extraction of one chemical from the mixture is then finished by separating the two layers. The experiment
conducted was successful in achieving its goals of showing the effects of salting out, extracting organic chemicals, and
figuring out how the number of extractions affected the distribution coefficient and percent yield. A proportion of component(s)
from the aqueous layer was removed from the organic layer after organic compounds were segregated based on their
solubilities. A direct correlation exists between the number of extractions and the distribution coefficient. These results are
comparable to the calculated percent yield. However, the resulting distribution coefficients are negative (-0.2224 and -0.2418)
and the percent yield exceeded 100% (128.6% and 131.9%). The calculations were double-checked and were identified to be
correct. Hence, errors can only come from procedural mistakes. This can be proven by the larger value of extracted acid
compared to the original sample. To avoid such errors, this paper also included a list of recommendation for future
researchers at the latter part.
Keywords: Extraction, Ether, Salting-out Effect, Distribution Coefficients, Direct Correlation, Immiscible
INTRODUCTION
Separating an organic component from a mixture of is soluble in both of them, which results in a partition. A very
chemicals is relatively important. These compounds are common question then arises which asks whether the
frequently created by synthetic processes or from natural organic layer sits on top or at the bottom. The relative
sources (Karger, 2022). A chemical process called densities of the organic and aqueous solvents determine
extraction involves dissolving one or more chemicals from a this. In most cases like this particular experiment, ether
mixture into the right solvent (Harris, 2015). In this solvents float on top of the mixture because they are
experiment, adipic acid and ether are separated and typically less dense than water. On the other hand,
purified from a combination of the two using the halogenated solvents are relatively heavier and usually sink
conventional method of liquid-liquid extraction. to the bottom (Nichols, 2022).
Utilizing a substance's differential solubility in several During extraction, the stopcock of the separatory funnel is
solvents, the process of liquid-liquid extraction is used to opened, enabling one layer to flow out, and the two phases
remove impurities. In contrast to crystallization, the sample are separated after they have settled back into two layers.
in this process can be either solid or liquid. This entails The liquid that released the solute is known as the extract,
dissolving the combination in the first solvent and adding a and the liquid that recovered it is known as the raffinate.
second immiscible solvent to dissolve one of the mixture's Following extraction, the sample's distribution (or partition)
components only (Sandtorv, 2021). The two layers are then coefficient KD determines the final ratio of the sample's
aggressively mixed to enable the transfer of a dissolved concentrations in the two solvents (Harvey, 2020). It is easy
component from one layer to the other since the solvents to express the concentration in mg of solute/mL of the
utilized are immiscible. The two layers are once again solution when speaking at the microscale. The
allowed to develop when the transfer is finished. The concentration of the sample in the extracting solvent 2 is
extraction of one chemical from the mixture is then finished provided by C2, while the final, or equilibrium, concentration
by separating the two layers. Though the experimented of the sample in the original solvent 1 is given by C1. The
solvents are immiscible, it should be noted that the sample
ratio between the two concentrations is the definition of the acid was transferred in the quick fit separatory funnel and
distribution coefficient, as seen below. was extracted using 10 mL of ether. The setup of the
extraction process is shown in Figure 1 below. It is to be
noted that before extraction, the two solutions were mixed
vigorously which leads to a pressure build-up inside the
vial. Because of this, the system was vented by carefully
Equation 1
removing the cap once in a while during the shaking
process. After extraction, a drop of phenolphthalein was
Needless to say, the distribution coefficient and extraction added to the aqueous layer and was once again titrated
efficiency increase with the sample concentration in the with the prepared 0.05 M NaOH. The remaining content of
extracting solvent. the separatory funnel was placed in a beaker labeled “Ether
Extract”. The same exact procedure was performed once
With all of those concepts kept in mind, the researchers again, but two extractions were made using 5 mL of ether
aimed to: each. All measurements, calculations, and observations
were recorded in the laboratory notebook.
Visualize the salting out effect
Separate organic compounds using extraction
Know the effect of the number of extraction on the
distribution coefficient
Know the effect of the number of extraction on the
percentage yield
extractions rises. This is consistent with several kinds of percentage yield have a direct proportion with the number
research showing that using modest quantities of organic of extractions.
solvents for a number of extractions is mathematically
shown to be more effective than using a big amount of To ensure precise and superior outcomes for the extracted
chemical, a number of measures must be performed during
organic solvent for a single extraction. Only a little portion of
extraction. Due to the ether being a very flammable
the analyte from the solution is recovered after a single substance, it is advised that future researchers make sure
extraction. The amount of analyte recovered from each there are no flames present in the lab when conducting the
extraction is the same, and the extracted fractions are experiment. To prevent unneeded compound leakage,
accumulated to provide a high extraction efficiency (Erkey, make sure the separatory funnel is closed when you fill it
2000). with compounds. Additionally, it is crucial to confirm that the
ether extract and the n-amyl alcohol solution were properly
disposed of in their corresponding trash bottles. Throughout
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS the actual extraction process, the mixture must be
constantly evacuated after shaking to prevent pressure
The experiment was successful in achieving its goals of buildup in the separatory funnel, which might result in
showing the effects of salting out, extracting organic accidents and funnel damage. Prior to extraction, the
chemicals, and figuring out how the number of extractions mixture must stand for a few minutes to stabilize and aid in
affected the distribution coefficient and percent yield. When the aqueous layer's settling, allowing for the extraction of
NaCl, an electrolyte, was added to the solution, the salting more desired components into the organic layer.
out effect was seen, which is the production of precipitation
owing to the lower solubility from the electrolyte influencing
the nonelectrolyte, thus creating a layer and forcing REFERENCES
separation. A proportion of component(s) from the aqueous
layer was removed from the organic layer after organic Erkey, C. (2000). Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of
compounds were segregated based on their solubilities. A metals from aqueous solutions: A review. The
direct correlation exists between the number of extractions Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 17(3), 259-
and the distribution coefficient. These results are 287. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-
comparable to the calculated percent yield. Moreover, when 8446(99)00047-9
additional components were isolated from the organic layer,
the distribution coefficient was affected by multiple Harris, D. C. (2015). Quantitative chemical analysis.
extractions. However, the resulting distribution coefficients Macmillan Higher Education.
are negative (-0.2224 and -0.2418) and the percent yield
exceeded 100% (128.6% and 131.9%). The calculations Harvey, D. (2020, August 11). 7.7: Liquid-liquid
were double-checked and were identified to be correct. extractions. Chemistry
Hence, errors can only come from procedural mistakes. LibreTexts. https://chem.libretexts.org/Courses/B
This can be proven by the larger value of extracted acid ethuneCookman_University/B-CU%3A_CH-
compared to the original sample. The fact that this is 345_Quantitative_Analysis/Book%3A_Analytical_
impossible to happen proves that there is indeed an issue Chemistry_2.1_(Harvey)/07%3A_Obtaining_and_
when the experiment was conducted. Preparing_Samples_for_Analysis/7.07%3A_Liqui
d-Liquid_Extractions
Overall, it is acceptable and justifiable to accept the
premise that extraction is a laboratory method for isolating Heinonen, J., & Sainio, T. (2013). Chromatographic
one or more components from a mixture using an extraction fractionation of Lignocellulosic
solvent. As seen on the first part, crystal violet becomes hydrolysates. Chemical Engineering for
less soluble in the presence of NaCl, an electrolyte, which Renewables Conversion, 42, 261-
leads to the formation of a layer. For the second part, it can 349. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-386505-
be inferred that the amount of titrant utilized for the aqueous 2.00005-5
layer analysis and the distribution coefficient as well as the