Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 29 views

    Arconado PHILARTS1 Case Study

    Uploaded by

    Rengel Arconado
    The document analyzes how the bahay kubo became viewed as the national house of the Philippines despite its status being influenced by colonialism and politics. After independence, leaders promoted vernacular architecture as representing Filipino identity. In the 1970s, tropical regionalism rose which honored the bahay kubo as the ideal structure for the Philippines' climate. National Artists Leandro Locsin and Francisco Manosa helped popularize the bahay kubo through their works. However, defining a solely authentic national identity ignores the country's diversity and colonial influences.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Arconado PHILARTS1 Case Study

    Uploaded by

    Rengel Arconado
    29 views4 pages
    The document analyzes how the bahay kubo became viewed as the national house of the Philippines despite its status being influenced by colonialism and politics. After independence, leaders promoted vernacular architecture as representing Filipino identity. In the 1970s, tropical regionalism rose which honored the bahay kubo as the ideal structure for the Philippines' climate. National Artists Leandro Locsin and Francisco Manosa helped popularize the bahay kubo through their works. However, defining a solely authentic national identity ignores the country's diversity and colonial influences.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document analyzes how the bahay kubo became viewed as the national house of the Philippines despite its status being influenced by colonialism and politics. After independence, leaders promoted vernacular architecture as representing Filipino identity. In the 1970s, tropical regionalism rose which honored the bahay kubo as the ideal structure for the Philippines' climate. National Artists Leandro Locsin and Francisco Manosa helped popularize the bahay kubo through their works. However, defining a solely authentic national identity ignores the country's diversity and colonial influences.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    29 views4 pages

    Arconado PHILARTS1 Case Study

    Uploaded by

    Rengel Arconado
    The document analyzes how the bahay kubo became viewed as the national house of the Philippines despite its status being influenced by colonialism and politics. After independence, leaders promoted vernacular architecture as representing Filipino identity. In the 1970s, tropical regionalism rose which honored the bahay kubo as the ideal structure for the Philippines' climate. National Artists Leandro Locsin and Francisco Manosa helped popularize the bahay kubo through their works. However, defining a solely authentic national identity ignores the country's diversity and colonial influences.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 4

    Bahay Kubo, Kahit Munti:

    An Analysis on the Status of the Bahay Kubo as a Cultural Icon of the Philippines

    A case study by: Rengel De Vera Arconado

    There is a general perception in the Philippines that the “pambansang bahay” of


    the country is the bahay kubo. The understanding was that this lowland vernacular is the
    perfect structure that can accommodate the tropical climate of the Philippines and is
    representative of Philippine culture. However, the truth is, the status of the bahay kubo
    as the national house is merely a result of a long history of colonialism and politics.

    In 1946, when the Philippines declared its independence from the United States,
    the country began its search for a “national identity” as a testament of its freedom from
    its colonizers. In the field of architecture, this reflected with the country’s efforts to
    establish an architecture that is for and by Filipinos. The immediate response was to deny
    the Philippines’ colonial history and return to its primeval roots – vernacular architecture.
    The early attempts of smearing structures with a sense of national identity was to “dress
    up” modern international style buildings with motifs and ornamentations that suggest
    “Filipino-ness”.

    In 1965, when Ferdinand Marcos became the President of the Republic of the
    Philippines, he used the country’s hunger for a concrete national identity by utilizing it as
    an important step in his palingenesis or national rebirth. He promised the Filipinos a “new
    nation” that is bred from Malayan ancestry. He gave his wife, Imelda Marcos, the reigns
    for the country’s culture and the arts. The former First Lady’s first step was to advocate
    the return of the “folk cultures”. She then saw the potential of architecture as an avenue
    in promoting the nation’s “Filipino-ness”. From here, she initiated the search for a national
    architectural style. Architects then experimented with forms, styles, and materials that are
    indigenous in nature.

    However, the oil crisis in the 1970s pushed architects to reassess current building
    traditions since the modern style building rely heavily on energy and oil for function and
    ventilation. Thus, tropical regionalism was born – an architectural movement that focuses
    on a region’s indigenous architectural style which is believed to be the utmost design that
    is suitable for that region’s microclimate. Regionalism became a factor in architectural
    practice and education. With architects hopping on the tropical romantic regionalism train,
    Manila was then bombarded by architecture that honor the low-land dwelling that is
    eminent in the Tagalog region – the bahay kubo

    During this period where the search for a national architectural style was rampant,
    the most recognized schools of architecture are the University of Santo Tomas, University
    of the Philippines, and the MAPUA University. Not surprisingly, all three universities are
    located within the National Capital Region. With the regionalism on trend, it would not be
    impossible that these schools also instilled in their students the importance of the bahay
    kubo’s design in the tropical climate of Manila, and the Philippines in general. They would
    later produce architecture graduates who would utilize the idea of the bahay kubo as a
    starting point in their designs. Two of these students would be UST graduates who would
    later on be recognized as National Artists for Architecture – Leandro Locsin and Francisco
    Manosa.

    Locsin and Manosa believed in the potential of neo-vernacularism or regionalism


    as an approach to the Philippine climate. They have designed different structures that
    took inspiration from native architectural forms such as Isneg houses and the Ifugao’s
    Fale. However, majority of their works, and the most notable ones, were influenced by
    none other than the bahay kubo.

    The influence of these two National artists, and the knowledge being taught in
    these schools of architecture that are within the National Capital Region in the field of
    architecture and the people’s perception as to what Filipino architecture should be could
    not be more highlighted.

    This is also where the issue of Imperial Manila comes into play. Manila, being seen
    as the center of the Philippines, holds power and influence that is unequal to other regions
    of the country. It is favored when it comes to dispersal of government funds, which fuels
    the unequal distribution of infrastructure projects. Meaning there’s more opportunity for
    Manila to showcase its structures that is representative of their take on what Filipino
    architecture should be.

    There is also the perception that Manila is at the center of the Philippine society,
    making it the home of mass media corporations which means that it gets more attention
    in news and tv shows, again taking advantage in publicizing to the country the works of
    “Filipino architecture” In the national capital region, which in turn, further popularizes the
    bahay kubo and unconsciously instilling to the minds of the Filipino people that this
    lowland vernacular dwelling is the utmost representation of what Filipino architecture is
    all about.

    The process of establishing representation is a highly political act. Symbols that


    are selected may come as problematic since there’s a huge possibility that they may not
    truly be representative of the cultural heterogeneity of the Philippines. The imaginings of
    a national culture was biased and prejudiced according to the ideas of architects,
    designers, and leaders. Evidently, whoever is in a position of power has the ability to
    influence and dictate the construction of national identity.

    Another issue that would arise is the notion of authenticity. In Philippine history,
    establishing Filipino identity has veered away from the country’s colonial past in order to
    create something that is “purely Filipino and differs from other cultures”. The term
    “authenticity” can be put into question. How authentic is an authentic Filipino architecture?

    Our cultural heritage is there as a testament and as a legacy of our nation’s past.
    It is part of our identity, but it is not our only identity. The discourse for national identity in
    architecture must not dwell on the question of origin but should rather shift on the question
    of practice.

    To define a national identity in architecture, the Philippines must deal with the ever-
    changing identities of contemporary Philippines.
    REFERENCES

    Alcazaren, Paulo. “Manosa: A Man for All-Seasons.” The Philippine Star, 18 Mar. 2017.

    Cabalfin, Edson. “‘Modernizing the Native: The Vernacular and the Nation in Philippine
    Modern Architectures.’” DOCOMOMO Journal 34 (2006): n. pag. Print.

    Cabalfin, Edson. “‘Postcolonial Identity Politics and Philippine Pavilions in International


    Expositions, 1958-1992.’” International Research Symposium Proceedings: “Expo and
    Human History” (2017)

    Henares, Ivan. “Balara Filtration Plant.” Industrial Heritage in the Philippines | TICCIH
    Philippines, Blogger, 25 Nov. 2020, https://www.ticcihphilippines.org/2020/11/balara-
    filtration-plant.html.

    Lamudi - December 7, et al. “Architect Francisco Mañosa: Defining Philippine Architecture


    through the Lens of a National Artist.” Lamudi, 4 July 2021,
    https://www.lamudi.com.ph/journal/architect-francisco-manosa-defining-philippine-
    architecture-through-the-lens-of-a-national-artist/.

    Lasco, Gideon. “'Imperial Manila'.” INQUIRER.net, 28 Dec. 2015,


    https://opinion.inquirer.net/91545/imperial-manila.

    Lico, Gerard. “‘Arkitekturang Filipino : A History of Architecture and Urbanism in the


    Philippines. “‘Diliman, Quezon City:University of the Philippines Press (2008)

    “History of Philippine Architecture.” United Architects of the Philippines,


    https://www.unitedarchitects.org/.

    Lifestyle Inquirer. “Mañosa at National Museum: The Filipino Artist Who Should Have
    Been National Artist.” Lifestyle.INQ, 14 Feb. 2017,
    https://lifestyle.inquirer.net/254488/manosa-national-museum-filipino-artist-national-
    artist/#ixzz7m9TOPlyC.

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy