Mohsenzadeh 2012
Mohsenzadeh 2012
Mohsenzadeh 2012
Received: 1 August 2011 Revised: 1 November 2011 Accepted: 1 November 2011 Published online in Wiley Online Library:
Abstract
Alkali-dissolution pretreatment of softwood spruce and hardwood birch to improve ethanol and biogas production was
investigated. The pretreatments were carried out at different temperatures between −15 and 80 ◦ C with NaOH/thiourea
(7/5.5 wt%), NaOH/urea (7/12 wt%), NaOH/urea/thiourea (7/8/6.5 wt%), and NaOH/PEG (7/1 wt%) aqueous solutions. The
pretreated materials were then subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis for 72 h. The pretreatments by NaOH/thiourea at −15 ◦ C
improved the hydrolysis yields of spruce from 11.7% to 57% of theoretical yield, and for birch from 23.1% to 83% of theoretical
yield. The enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of these pretreated materials by NaOH/thiourea with baker’s yeast resulted
in 54.0% of theoretical yield compared with 10.9% for untreated spruce and 80.9% of theoretical yield compared with 12.9% for
untreated birch. Furthermore, anaerobic digestion of pretreated materials resulted in 0.36 L g−1 VS methane compared with
0.23 L g−1 VS for untreated birch, and 0.21 L g−1 VS compared with 0.03 L g−1 VS for untreated spruce.
c 2012 Society of Chemical Industry
enzymatic hydrolysis for 72 h, and the best results were applied Digestion
for ethanol and biogas production. Using thermophilic bacteria at 55 ◦ C, anaerobic digestion was
performed in serum glass bottles which were closed with butyl
rubber seals and aluminum caps.18 The working volume of the
MATERIALS AND METHODS bottles was 118 mL. The inoculum was delivered from a 3000 m3
Raw materials and their analyses municipal solid waste digester operating at thermophilic (55 ◦ C)
Spruce (Picea abies) and birch (Betula pendula) wood species were conditions (Borås Energi och Miljö AB, Borås, Sweden). Pretreated
collected from the forests around the city of Borås in Sweden. They or untreated wood (0.25 g), 20 mL inoculum, and 5 mL deionized
were debarked and milled to particle size between 75 and 500 µm, water were added to each flask. In order to estimate the amount
and their dry weights were determined by drying at 105 ◦ C for 24 h. of biogas produced by just the inoculum, deionized water and
The carbohydrate and lignin fractions were analyzed according to inoculum were used as blank. Furthermore, each flask was flushed
NREL procedure.12 In this method, acid hydrolysis of cellulose and with a mixture of 80% nitrogen and 20% carbon dioxide to achieve
hemicelluloses is carried out to depolymerize them to sugars, and anaerobic conditions. In order to calculate the amount of methane
the lignin is measured as acid-insoluble and acid-soluble lignins. produced during digestion, samples of gas were taken from the
The acid-soluble lignin was measured by UV–vis spectroscopy at headspace of flasks on a regular basis and analyzed by a gas
205 nm with absorptivity of 30 (L g−1 cm−1 ). chromatograph (GC).
Pretreatments
Analytical methods
Aqueous alkali solutions were prepared by mixing 7 wt% NaOH
The methane and carbon dioxide in biogas were analyzed
with 12 wt% urea, 5.5 wt% thiourea, 1 wt% PEG, or 8 wt%
using a GC (Auto System Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA) supplied
urea/6.5 wt% thiourea in deionized water. For the pretreatments,
with a packed column (Perkin Elmer, 6 × 1.8 OD, 80/100,
7 g of wood species was added to 93 g alkaline solution and stirred
Mesh) and a thermal conductivity detector (Perkin Elmer)
for 30 min at room temperature. The mixtures were stored at −15,
with inject temperature of 150 ◦ C. The carrier gas used was
0, 22, and 80 ◦ C for 16 h then, 100 mL of deionized water was
added to each solution and stirred for 1 h at ambient temperature. nitrogen with a flow rate of 23 mL min−1 at 60 ◦ C. Sugars and
The pretreated wood samples were then filtered and washed with fermentation products were analyzed by HPLC (Waters, Milford,
deionized water to remove the chemicals, and neutralize to pH 7. MA) supplied with RI detector (Waters 2414) and an ion-exchange
These pretreated materials were then freeze-dried to maintain column (Aminex HPX-87H, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) at 60 ◦ C using
the water swelling state and to prevent structural collapse before 5 mmol L−1 H2 SO4 as eluent at flow rate 0.6 mL min−1 .
further use.13 The crystallinity of pretreated lignocelluloses was measured
by a Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer (Impact 410,
Nicolet Instrument Corp., Madison, WI). The spectra were acquired
Enzymatic hydrolysis
with an average of 64 scans and a resolution of 4 cm−1 , in the
The pretreated and untreated lignocelluloses were enzymatically
range from 600 to 4000 cm−119 monitored by ‘Nicolet OMNIC 4.1’
hydrolyzed using 5% w/v dry matter in 50 mmol L−1 sodium citrate
software.
buffer at pH 4.8. The suspensions were autoclaved, and then
All experiments and analyses were performed in duplicate,
supplemented with 20 FPU cellulase (celluclast 1.5L, Novozyme,
except the digestions, which were performed in triplicate, and
Denmark) and 50 IU β-glucosidase (Novozyme 188, Novozyme,
results are presented as mean values. The average standard
Denmark) per gram of dry wood. The enzymatic hydrolyses were
deviation was 4.3%.
carried out at 45 ◦ C in 100 mL flasks in a water bath shaker (OLS
200, Grant Instruments, UK) at 120 rpm for 72 h. The activities of the
cellulase and β-glucosidase were 80 FPU mL−1 and 240 IU mL−1
measured according to Adney and Baker14 and Ximenes et al.,15
RESULTS
respectively. Spruce and birch wood species were pretreated by four different
alkaline solutions including [7 wt% NaOH, 5.5 wt% thiourea],
[7 wt% NaOH, 8 wt% urea, 6.5 wt% thiourea], [7 wt% NaOH, 12 wt%
Fermentation
urea], or [7 wt% NaOH, 1 wt% PEG] at −15, 0, 22 and 80 ◦ C for 16 h.
Fermentations were performed in 118 mL anaerobic bottles. The
The effects of all pretreatments on the composition and enzymatic
fermenting microorganism was a flocculation strain of Saccha-
hydrolysis of the wood species were investigated. Then, the best
romyces cerevisiae (CCUG 53 310, Culture Collection, University of
pretreatment conditions were applied to further study of the
Gothenburg, Sweden). The strain was preserved on agar plates
crystallinity changes of the lignocelluloses, and yields of ethanol
containing (g L−1 ): yeast extract, 10; soy peptone, 10; glucose, 20;
and biogas in fermentation and anaerobic digestion, respectively.
agar, 20. It was grown at 30 ◦ C and maintained at 4 ◦ C. A volume
of 20 mL of each hydrolyzate was supplemented with 5 mL of all
other nutrients16 and were inoculated with 1.0 ± 0.1 g L−1 yeast Effects of the pretreatments on the composition of birch
and were incubated at 30 ◦ C in a shaking bath for 30 h anaero- and spruce
bically. Samples were analyzed for ethanol and sugar by HPLC. The effects of pretreatments of birch and spruce on their cellulose
All experiments were performed in duplicate and average values and lignin compositions are summarized in Table 1. Acid-insoluble
were reported. The inocula were prepared by aerobic cultivation of lignin (AIL) was dominant in these wood species. The AIL content
the yeast in 1 L cotton-plugged Erlenmeyer flasks in a water-bath of birch was 21.9%, which was increased to 23.1–27.3% after
shaker at 120 rpm and 30 ◦ C for 24 h. A 500 mL growth medium various pretreatments, while the AIL in spruce which was 28.3%
was prepared as previously reported.17 The yeast was separated was not significantly changed (Table 1). On the other hand, the
after 5 min settlement followed by 5000 rpm centrifugation for effect of alkaline pretreatment on the acid-soluble lignin (ASL)
10 min under aseptic conditions. content was more significant. By decreasing the temperature of
wileyonlinelibrary.com/jctb
c 2012 Society of Chemical Industry J Chem Technol Biotechnol (2012)
Alkali pretreatment of softwood spruce and hardwood birch www.soci.org
Table 1. Cellulose and lignin content of treated and untreated birch and spruce
Acid insoluble lignin (AIL) Birch (wt%) Acid insoluble lignin (AIL) Spruce (wt%)
Acid soluble lignin (ASL) Birch (wt%) Acid soluble lignin (ASL) Spruce (wt%)
the pretreatment, the ASL content of birch increased between 41 The cellulose contents of the pretreated and untreated
and 115% compared with an untreated sample. However, it did lignocelluloses are presented in Table 1. For all reagents, increasing
not change more than 38% for spruce (Table 1). the temperature of pretreatment generally resulted in higher
Although it seems that the pretreatment has increased the cellulose content of the pretreated materials (Table 1). The effect
lignin content, the calculated lignin removal of pretreatments of the pretreatments on the cellulose is clearer when calculating
showed dissimilar results (Table 2). A considerable part of the cellulose recovery (Table 2). The recoveries of cellulose were
lignin, i.e. 11.1–38.9%, was removed by the pretreatments. defined as the ratio of the difference between the amount of
The lignin removal by NaOH/thiourea and NaOH/thiourea/urea cellulose before and after the pretreatments to the amount of
was more successful at higher temperatures, for both hard- cellulose in untreated lignocellulose. Cellulose recovery for spruce
and softwoods – whereas at 80 ◦ C, the NaOH/thiourea solution was more than that for the birch species, and in both cases
removed 34.2 and 18.7%, and NaOH/thiourea/urea removed 38.9 it increased with the temperature due to better solubility of
and 19.4% of the lignin of birch and spruce, respectively. However, cellulose at the lower temperature (Table 2). It is apparent from
the best temperatures for lignin removal by NaOH/urea and the data in Table 2 that the cellulose recovery is more dependent
NaOH/PEG from both hard- and softwoods were 0 and 22 ◦ C, on the temperature than on the type of mixed reagent with
respectively (Table 2). NaOH. However, for all the temperatures, the recovery of cellulose
Table 2. Lignin removal and cellulose recovery after alkali pretreatment of birch and spruce species under different conditions
Birch Spruce
60 60
(A) NaOH/thiourea (B) NaOH/thiourea/urea
50 50
(% of theoretical yield)
(% of theoretical yield)
Glucose yield
Glucose yield
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
0 24 48 72 0 24 48 72
60 60
(C) NaOH/urea (D) NaOH/PEG
50 50
(% of theoretical yield)
(% of theoretical yield)
Glucose yield
Glucose yield
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
0 24 48 72 0 24 48 72
Time (h) Time (h)
Figure 1. Enzymatic hydrolysis of untreated and pretreated birch by aqueous solutions of NaOH/thiourea, NaOH/thiourea/urea, NaOH/urea, and
NaOH/PEG at different temperatures: (•) untreated wood, and pretreatment at () −15 ◦ C, () 0 ◦ C, () 22 ◦ C, and (×) 80 ◦ C. The glucose yield is
calculated as the percentage of theoretical yield [glucose produced (g L−1 ) (1.111× biomass (g L−1 ) ×F), where F is the cellulose fraction in biomass].
wileyonlinelibrary.com/jctb
c 2012 Society of Chemical Industry J Chem Technol Biotechnol (2012)
Alkali pretreatment of softwood spruce and hardwood birch www.soci.org
100 100
(A) NaOH/thiourea (B) NaOH/thiourea/urea
90 90
(% of theoretical yield)
(% of theoretical yield)
80 80
70 70
Glucose yield
Glucose yield
60 60
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
0 24 48 72 0 24 48 72
100 100
(C) NaOH/urea
90 90 (D) NaOH/PEG
(% of theoretical yield)
(% of theoretical yield)
80 80
70 70
Glucose yield
Glucose yield
60 60
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
0 24 48 72 0 24 48 72
Time (hr) Time (hr)
Figure 2. Enzymatic hydrolysis of untreated and pretreated spruce by aqueous solutions of NaOH/thiourea, NaOH/thiourea/urea, NaOH/urea, and
NaOH/PEG at different temperatures: (•) untreated wood, and pretreatment at () −15 ◦ C, () 0 ◦ C, () 22 ◦ C, and (×) 80 ◦ C. The glucose yield is
calculated as the percentage of theoretical yield [glucose produced (g L−1 ) (1.111× biomass (g L−1 ) ×F), where F is the cellulose fraction in biomass].
0.4 0.8
Untreated
Methane yield (l/g VS)
0.3 Treated
0.2
Crystallinity Index
0.7
0.1
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0.6
Time (days)
hydrolysis. Therefore, the parity of lignin removal with improving 2 Taherzadeh M and Karimi K, Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes
enzymatic hydrolysis might not be the only important factor, at to improve ethanol and biogas production: a review. Int J Mol Sci
9:1621–1651 (2008).
least for some lignocelluloses. The crystallinity of pretreated and
3 Ruan D, Lue A and Zhang L, Gelation behaviors of cellulose solution
untreated materials was also investigated. FTIR analyses showed dissolved in aqueous NaOH/thiourea at low temperature. Polymer
that the alkali pretreatment was able to reduce the crystallinity of 49:1027–1036 (2008).
both birch and spruce species. Decreasing the crystallinity index 4 Zhou Q, Zhang L, Li M, Wu X and Cheng G, Homogeneous hy-
can also result in improving the hydrolysis yield, but more investi- droxyethylation of cellulose in NaOH/urea aqueous solution. Polym
Bull 53:243–248 (2005).
gation is necessary to find the most important reason. Using these 5 Jin H, Zha C and Gu L, Direct dissolution of cellulose in NaOH/
dissolution systems is more efficient than NaOH pretreatment thiourea/urea aqueous solution. Carbohydr Res 342:851–858
alone, particularly on the softwood spruce. In another study using (2007).
the same wood species, enzymes and method, Mirahmadi et al.11 6 Egal M, Budtova T and Navard P, The dissolution of microcrystalline
cellulose in sodium hydroxide-urea aqueous solutions. Cellulose
showed that NaOH pretreatment could improve the yield of enzy-
15:361–370 (2008).
matic hydrolysis of spruce from 14.1% to 35.7%, while dissolution 7 Yan L and Gao Z, Dissolving of cellulose in PEG/NaOH aqueous solution.
with NaOH/thiourea at −15 ◦ C in the current work improved the Cellulose 15:789–796 (2008).
hydrolysis yield from 11.7% to 57%. 8 Chen J, Spear S, Huddleston J and Rogers R, Polyethylene glycol and
The ethanol yield in this work was increased from 12.9% of solutions of polyethylene glycol as green reaction media. Green
Chem 7:64–82 (2005).
theoretical yield for untreated birch to 80.9% for pretreated birch, 9 Cuissinat C and Navard P, Swelling and dissolution of cellulose part
and also from 10.9% of theoretical yield for untreated spruce to II: free floating cotton and wood fibres in NaOH-water-additives
54.9% for pretreated spruce. The pretreatment with dissolution systems. Macromol Symp 244:19–30 (2006).
systems significantly enhanced the yield of ethanol production, 10 Zhang Y and Lynd L, Toward an aggregated understanding of
enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: noncomplexed cellulase systems.
particularly for the hardwood birch. In addition, the pretreatment
Biotechnol Bioeng 88:797–824 (2004).
greatly affected the methane production for both wood species. 11 Mirahmadi K, Kabir MM, Jeihanipour A, Karimi K and Taherzadeh M,
The biogas yields of untreated birch and spruce were improved Alkaline pretreatment of spruce and birch to improve bioethanol
by 56% and 600% after pretreatment. However, the pretreatment and biogas production. BioResources 5:928–938 (2010).
was more efficient for the hardwood than for the softwood used. 12 Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, et al,
Standard biomass analytical procedures: determination of structural
The analyses of lignin removal and cellulose recovery before carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. National Renewable Energy
and after pretreatments showed that a higher temperature is Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA (<http://wwwnrelgov/biomass/
more effective for lignin removal. A lower temperature resulted in analytical procedures> html) (2004).
lower recovery of cellulose for all combinations of tested reagents, 13 Kuo C and Lee C, Enhancement of enzymatic saccharification of
implying that the dissolution of cellulose in NaOH is increased by cellulose by cellulose dissolution pretreatments. Carbohydr Polym
decreasing the temperature.9 It has previously been reported that 77:41–46 (2009).
14 Adney B and Baker J, Standard biomass analytical procedures:
the addition of urea and thiourea increases cellulose dissolution.5,9 measurement of cellulase activities. National Renewable Energy
However, these components do not interact with cellulose directly; Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA (<http://wwwnrelgov/biomass/
they trap the free water and prevent interaction between cellulose analytical procedures> html) (1996).
chains via hydrogen bonds.6 PEG molecules also act as hydrogen- 15 Ximenes E, Felix C and Ulhoa C, Production of cellulases by aspergillus
bonding acceptors and prevent the reassociation of cellulose fumigatus and characterization of one -glucosidase. Curr Microbiol
hydroxyl groups.7 Therefore, these compounds can affect the 32:119–123 (1996).
16 Taherzadeh M, Fox M, Hjorth H and Edebo L, Production of mycelium
dissolution process positively, while increasing the temperature biomass and ethanol from paper pulp sulfite liquor by Rhizopus
decreases the quality of the solvent.9 According to the results oryzae. Bioresource Technol 88:167–177 (2003).
obtained in this study, the temperature is an important factor in 17 Karimi K, Emtiazi G and Taherzadeh M, Ethanol production from
this process, which affects the composition of wood. dilute-acid pretreated rice straw by simultaneous saccharification
and fermentation with Mucor indicus, Rhizopus oryzae, and
Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Enzyme Microbiol Technol 40:138–144
(2006).
CONCLUSION 18 Hansen T, Schmidt J, Angelidaki I, Marca E, Jansen J, Mosbæk H, et al,
Among the different alkali dissolution systems, pretreatment by Method for determination of methane potentials of solid organic
NaOH/thiourea aqueous solution at −15 ◦ C and atmospheric pres-
waste. Waste Manage 24:393–400 (2004).
19 Carrillo F, Colom X, Suñol JJ and Saurina J, Structural FTIR analysis
sure is an effective alternative for pretreating hard- and softwoods and thermal characterisation of lyocell and viscose-type fibres. Eur
to enhance biogas and bioethanol production. However, the pro- Polym J 40:2229–2234 (2004).
cess is more effective for hardwood birch than for softwood spruce. 20 Gregg D and Saddler J, Bioconversion of lignocellulosic residue
to ethanol: process flowsheet development. Biomass Bioenergy
9:287–302 (1995).
21 Palonen H, Thomsen A, Tenkanen M, Schmidt A and Viikari L, Evaluation
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of wet oxidation pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of softwood.
This work was supported financially by Sparbanken Sjuhärad Appl Biochem Biotechnol 117:1–17 (2004).
(Sweden). 22 Isogai A and Atalla R, Dissolution of cellulose in aqueous NaOH
solutions. Cellulose 5:309–319 (1998).
REFERENCES
1 Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, Elander R, Lee YY, Holtzapple M,
et al, Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of
lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technol 96:673–686 (2005).
wileyonlinelibrary.com/jctb
c 2012 Society of Chemical Industry J Chem Technol Biotechnol (2012)