Communication - Unit 3 - Models
Communication - Unit 3 - Models
Communication - Unit 3 - Models
Ans. Models are representations. In each case, the model is designed to provide a simplified
view of some more complex object, phenomenon, or process, so that fundamental properties or
characteristics can be highlighted and examined. Models highlight some features that their
designers believe are particularly critical, and there is less focus on other features. Thus, by
examining models, one learns not only about the object, situation, or process, but also about the
perspective of the designer.
According to Mortensen; ‘In the broadest sense, a model is a systematic representation of an
object or event in idealized and abstract form. Models are somewhat arbitrary by their nature.
The act of abstracting eliminates certain details to focus on essential factors. The key to the
usefulness of a model is the degree to which it conforms in point by point correspondence- to the
underlying determinants of communicative behavior.
The simplest definition of a model is that it is an analogue. Models are metaphors. They allow us
to see one thing in terms of another. Models represent system or processes. They are a symbolic
way at looking at systems to help us think about them more lucidly. Models give us an idea of
complicated events in a general way.
A Model is an abstract representation of reality but being an abstraction is not the reality but a
representation of reality and executive of that process. Models tend to give us a simplified view
of a complete phenomenon.
https://www.academia.edu/16662535/Models_of_Communication
https://thebusinesscommunication.com/what-is-communication-model-functions-of-
communication-model/
Example: Alexander gave brave speech to his soldiers in the war field to defeat Persian Empire.
Speaker – Alexander
Speech – about his invasion
Occasion – War field
Audience – Soldiers
Effect – To defeat Persia
Aristotle has given importance to a good communicator role in communication. Here are the
three elements that should be present in a good public speaker to engage his audience-
1. Ethos- Ethos is the first most important quality that should be present in a good speaker. If he
takes the credibility of his words and speech, the speech would automatically be liked and
acknowledged by the audience.
If the speaker is not taking credit for his speech, the audience might feel cheated and won’t
believe in the user.
2. Pathos -Pathos means feeling connected. If a speaker is giving a speech and the audience feels
emotional bonding with the speech, they’ll automatically be mesmerized by it. This sort of
emotional bonding with the speaker would result in high engagement from the audience.
For example, a politician visits a village and notices people are constantly complaining about the
water crisis. He automatically includes this problem in his speech and talks about the solutions
for removing the crisis. This is another well-appreciated quality of a speaker.
3. Logos- Logos means logic. The speech needs to be engaging as well as have some logic
behind it. If the content is irrelevant and has no association with the occasion and the audience,
the speech won’t be appreciated and liked.
There has to proper information backed by adequate logic and sense. Any persuasion can only
work if it has some relevance and specificity.
Another example is- A politician (the speaker) gives a speech on a market square during an
election campaign (the occasion). His goal is the win the votes of the citizens (the audience)
present as well as those of the citizens potentially watching the speech on TV. The people will
vote (the effect) for the politician if they believe in his views. At the same time, the way in which
he presents his story is crucial in convincing his audience.
The politician talks about his party’s standpoints and will probably be familiar with his audience.
In other situations, it would be more suitable to actively research the audience in advance and
determine their potential viewpoints or opinions.
Despite the fact that at first glance there does not seem much wrong with Aristotle’s
communication model, there are important points of criticism of the model.
The main point of communication is that the model considers a directional process, from
speaker to receiver. In reality, it is a dynamic process in which both the speaker and receiver
are active. Evidence for this can be found, for example, in the technology of eavesdropping.
Because of the above, the model is useless in many situations because the feedback is not
included. The phenomenon of noise is also missing from the model, these matters are
considered important components within the communication.
https://digiaide.com/aristotle-model-of-communication/
https://medium.com/@pragyamishra_84005/aristotles-model-of-communication-254aa568fb0a
https://www.toolshero.com/communication-methods/aristotle-model-of-communication/
https://www.communicationtheory.org/aristotle%E2%80%99s-communication-model/
Shannon-Weaver model of communication
In 1948, Shannon was an American mathematician, Electronic engineer and Weaver was an American
scientist both of them join together to write an article in “Bell System Technical Journal” called “A
Mathematical Theory of Communication” and also called as “Shannon-Weaver model of
communication”.
This model is specially designed to develop the effective communication between sender and receiver.
Also they find factors which affecting the communication process called “Noise”.
The model deals with various concepts like Information source, transmitter, Noise, channel, message,
receiver, channel, information destination, encode and decode.
Sender : The originator of message or the information source selects desire message
Encoder : The transmitter which converts the message into signals
Note: The sender’s messages converted into signals like waves or Binary data which is compactable to
transmit the messages through cables or satellites. For example: In telephone the voice is converted into
wave signals and it transmits through cables
Decoder: The reception place of the signal which converts signals into message. A reverse process of
encode
Note: The receiver converts those binary data or waves into message which is comfortable and
understandable for receiver. Otherwise receiver can’t receive the exact message and it will affect the
effective communication between sender and receiver
Receiver: The destination of the message from sender
Note: Based on the decoded message the receiver gives their feed back to sender. If the message
distracted by noise it will affect the communication flow between sender and receiver
Noise: The messages are transferred from encoder to decoder through channel. During this process the
messages may distracted or affected by physical noise like horn sounds, thunder and crowd noise or
encoded signals may distract in the channel during the transmission process which affect the
communication flow or the receiver may not receive the correct message
Note : The model is clearly deals with external noises only which affect the messages or signals from
external sources. For example: If there is any problems occur in network which directly affect the mobile
phone communication or distract the messages.
Practical Example of Shannon-Weaver model of communication :
Thomson made call to his assistant “come here I want to see you”. During his call, noise appeared
(transmission error) and his assistant received “I want” only. Again Assistant asked Thomson (feedback)
“what do you want Thomson”.
Sender : Thomson
Encoder : Telephone (Thomson)
Channel : Cable
Noise : Distraction in voice
Reception : Telephone (Assistant)
Receiver : Assistant.
Due to transmission error or noise, Assistant can’t able to understand Thomson’s messages.
*The noise which affect the communication flow between them.
Sender: The person who wishes to communicate the message. He or she makes up the message and the
way it is communicated.
Encoder: This is the was the message is changed into signals, for example sound waves. This is done by
the sender when transmitting the message. It can also be, for example, the language used when
speaking, or the grammar used when writing. In this case, since the model was made up for technical
communication and example of encoding could be when the voice over the telephone gets coded into
wave and transmitted through cables (CommunicationTheory.org, 2010).
Decoder: Decoding is done by the receiver when he gets the message. He has to decode the message
that was coded by the receiver in order to be able to understand it.
Receiver: The recipient of the message from the sender. He usually gives feedback to the sender in
order to make sure that the message was properly received.
Noise: The message is transferred through a channel, which can be interrupted by external noise. This in
turn could result in the receiver getting an inaccurate message. This is why feedback from the receiver is
important in case the message is not properly received. Furthermore, the noise can also affect the
decoding of the message by the receiver.
Feedback: This is when the receiver asks for clarifications from the sender. Feedback is important in
order to make sure that the message has been well received.
Therefore, the sender encodes messages and transmits it to the sender via a channel. There is physical
noise through that channel which can interfere with the reception of the message.
Sender (Information source), Encoder (Transmitter), Channel, Decoder (Receiver), Receiver
(Destination) & Noise.
Lasswell's communication model was developed by communication theorist Harold D. Lasswell (1902-
1978) in 1948. Lasswell’s model of communication (also known as action model or linear model or one
way model of communication) is regarded as one the most influential communication models.
Components of Lasswell's Communication Model
Lasswell's communication model has 5 components which are used as an analysis tool for evaluating the
communication process and components. The components are the questions to be asked to get the
answers and keep communication going.
Components Meaning Analysis
With What Effect the feedback of the receiver to the sender Effect Analysis
Though Lasswell's model was developed to analyze mass communication, this model is used for
interpersonal communication or group communication to be disseminated message to various groups
in various situations. The point in Lasswell’s comment is that there must be an “Effect”, if
communication takes place. If we have communicated, we have “motivated” or produced an “Effect”.
Lasswell's model was developed to study the media propaganda of countries and businesses at that
time. Only rich people used to have communication mediums such as televisions and radios back them.
It was made to show the mass media culture.
Lasswell also brought the concept of Effective Communication Process. He talked about the relation
between presentation of facts and how it generates different effects. The use of the concept of effect
makes Lasswell's model non-linear unlike its name. It's because effect can also be taken as feedback.
Though, generally, the component of effect was made to be more about outcome of the message, the
model is applied in different Medias and fields despite being developed specifically for mass
communication.
Their model is more graphical than Lasswell's. George Gerbner, who is the founder of the cultivation
theory, expanded Lasswell's model and included the concept of reaction of the receiver.
The major criticism of Lasswell’s Model is that it does not include feedback and it ignores the possibility
of noise. Without feedback, a communication process cannot be fruitful.
Lasswell's model is very linear and does not consider barriers in the communication process. The model
is also criticized for being very general and only including very traditional topics.
The model is very simplistic. The model is said to be propaganda based as it is more focused on the
resulting outcome and generally used for media persuasion.
THEODORE M.NEWCOMB (July 24, 1903) in Rock Creek, at the northeastern tip of Ohio and he was a
great pioneer in the field of social psychology. Merely 50 years he worked for the improvement of
human motivation, perception and learning to shape the deep understanding of social process. In 1929,
he started his professional career in the department of psychology at University of
Michigan. In 1931, he moved to Cleveland College, University of Western Reserve
from University of Michigan. In 1934, he got a great offer from New Bennington
College in Vermont which caused remarkable changes in his rest of his professional
career. His works “Personality and Social Change” (1943), “Social Psychology” (1950).
He published a new social approach in field of communication which is called “ABX”
system (later it became Newcomb’s model) and it’s published in the name of “An
Approach to the Study of Communicative Acts (1953)”. He published another great
work in the field of social psychology called “The Acquaintance Process” (1961).
The New Comb’s model of communication was introduced by Theodore M Newcomb
of the University of Michigan in 1953. He gives different approach to the communication process. The
main purpose of this theory is to introduce the role of communication in a social relationship (society)
and to maintain social equilibrium within the social system. He does not include the message as a
separate entity in his diagram, implying it only by use of directional arrows. He concentrates on the
social purpose of communication, showing all communication as a means of sustaining relationships
between people. Sometimes it’s called as an “ABX” model of communication.
wecommunication.blogspot.com/2012/01/theories-of-communication-newcombs.html
Westley and MacLean’s Model of Communication was suggested by Bruce Westley (1915-
1990) and Malcolm S. MacLean Jr. (1913-2001) in 1957. This model was an adaptation from
Newcomb’s model of communication, which talked about co-orientation for simultaneous
orientation in a two way communication. It also consisted of some concepts from Lewin’s
model. Unlike Dance’s Helical Model of Communication, the model says that communication
does not begin when one person starts speaking, but it does when a person responds to
something from his/her surroundings. The person must first receive message from the
environment and then, he/she responds according to his/her object of orientation.
The Westley and MacLean’s model can be applied in two contexts: interpersonal and mass
communication, the point of difference being the feedback. Feedback is direct and fast in
interpersonal communication and indirect and slow in mass communication. The model also
differentiates message as purposive and non-purposive.
The major components in the communication process for the model are
Source (A) - Source is the message creator and sender.
Environment (X) - Environment is the physical and psychological situation where the message
is being created and sent.
Sensory experience (X1…) - Sensory experience is the first thing that the source sees by which
the source gets the idea for the formation of the message.
Objects of Orientation (X1, X2,…) - Objects of orientation is the person's social and cultural
reality that has formed from his/her past experiences and teachings.
Message Interpretation or Coding (X’) - Message is interpreted with the objects of orientation
of the receiver of the message.
Receiver (B) - The person who gets the message sent by the source and the person who
interprets according to his/her objects of orientation.
Object of Orientation of Receiver (X, b) - The views and ideas of the receiver or his/her social
reality is his/her object of orientation. That is how the receiver interprets the message.
Feedback (f) - The receiver forms another message after interpreting the message and sends it
back to the sender. It is known as feedback.
Gatekeeper (C) - Gatekeepers are found in mass communication. The gatekeeper is the editor
who filters the message as per the needs of the audience and media institution.
Opinion Leader - Opinion leaders are well known and recognized people who can influence
public opinions.
Mr. George Gerbner is one of the pioneers in the field of communication research. His works are
descriptive as well as very easy to understand any other before. He is working as a professor and head of
the Annenberg School of Communications in the University of Pennsylvania. In 1956, Gerbner
attempted the general purpose of communication models. He stressed the dynamic nature of
communication in his work and also the factor which affecting the reliability of communication.
(Note: This model can be best understood when read along with the diagram beginning at E – Event.)
OR
(i) Perceptual Dimension:
An ‘E’ is an event happens in the real life and the event content or message is perceived by ‘M’ (Man or
a Machine). After Perceives the message from “E” by “M” is known as “E1”. E1 is not same as like ‘E’.
Because any man or machine can’t perceives the whole event and they perceives only the part of the
event (E1). This is known as “Perceptual Dimension”.
M (man or machine) cannot perceive the entire content of the event “E”. So M selects the interesting or
needed content from the entire event and filtering the others. The context occurs in the event and
Availability is based on ‘M’s attitude, mood, culture and personality. (For eg. How a journalist perceives
the messages from the event and also can’t focus the whole event so they filter the unwanted or
unrelated content from the event. This filtered content is not same as like the actual event content
because the journalist edits the content based on his attitude, mood and cultural background or press
policies).
This process can be extended to infinitum by adding on other receivers (M2, M3etc.) who have further
perceptions (SE3, SE4 etc.) of the statements about perceived events.
Example:- In case of news reporting, E can be any event that has happened and the reporter (M) selects
a particular part of event (E1) that may be provide his channel higher TRP ratings or the news may boost
the particular party which his channel supports. This SE2 is sent through a medium to the mass
audience. Then the audience distributed the message (SE2) and he (M1) sends to his friends with his
interpretation and the process continues.
The George Gerbner Model of Communication has the following advantages and disadvantages:
Advantages
The George Gerbner Model of Communication approaches communication as a two-way street.
This makes the model applicable in general communication.
Compared to, for example, the Shannon Weaver model, this model is easy to understand.
The role of feedback plays an important role, so that nuance can be added.
The George Gerbner Model of Communication is applicable for both human and
telecommunication.
Disadvantages
George Gerbner Model of Communication does not address barriers and challenges in
communication in addition to feedback.
Summary of the George Gerbner Model of Communication
In addition, various factors play a role in the reliability of communication. The model is an
extension of the Laswel communication model and describes the process of communication in
two different dimensions: the perceptual dimension and the means and control dimension. Here
E is the event or situation, M the observer and S the perception variable.
https://www.toolshero.com/communication-methods/george-gerbner-model-of-
communication/#:~:text=The%20George%20Gerbner%20Model%20of%20Communication%20
is%20an%20extension%20of,sends%20messages%20to%20the%20sender.
https://www.academia.edu/16662535/Models_of_Communication
Media influence affects the order of presentation in news reports about news events, issues in the
public mind. More importance to a news-more importance attributed by audience. Media
Priorities It says what people should think about and how people should think about.
First Level: Mostly studied by researchers, media uses objects or issues to influence the people
what people should think about.
Second level: Media focuses on the characters of issues how people should think about. Agenda
setting theory used in political ad, campaigns, business news, PR (public relation) etc.
The main concept associated with the agenda setting theory is gate keeping. Gate keeping
controls over the selection of content discussed in the media; Public cares mostly about the
product of a media gate keeping. It is especially editors media itself is a gatekeeper. News media
decides ‘what’ events to admit through media ‘gates’ on ground of ‘newsworthiness’.
For e.g.: News Comes from various sources, editors choose what should appear and what should
not that‘s why they are called as gatekeepers.
Priming
Activity of the media in proposing the values and standards by which objects of the media
attention can be judged. Media‘s content will provide a lot of time and space to certain issues,
making it more vivid.
To say in simple words, Media is giving utmost importance to news so that it gives people the
impression that is the most important information. This is done every day the particular news is
carried as a heading or covered everyday for months.
Headlines, Special news features, discussions, expert opinions are used.
Media primes a news by repeating the news and giving it more importance E.g. Nuclear deal.
Framing
Framing is a process of selective control
Two Meanings
1. Way in which news content is typically shaped and contextualized within same frame of
reference.
2. Audience adopts the frames of reference and to see the world in a similar way. It is how
people attach importance to a news and perceive it context within which an issue is viewed.
Framing talks about how people attach importance to certain news for e.g. in case of attack,
defeat, win and loss, how the media frames the news such that people perceive it in a different
way.
We can take India and Pakistan war; same happening is framed in different ways in both the
countries. So depending on which media you view your perception will differ.
Here are examples that can help you better understand the theory of agenda-setting:
Media agencies sometimes highlight certain events like sporting events, musical concerts or
cultural events in a manner that generates the public's interest. The audience may not be
organically interested in the particular event, but the ongoing media reportage may influence the
group to look forward and even go to the event. Such media coverage campaigns help these
events be successful and profitable and help the media house generate revenues through
marketing them.
A full-page news advertisement or a special broadcast on a certain weight loss pill can help
create curiosity among people about its effectiveness. Such media campaigns usually introduce
new products and services to the public and target audiences to try the product. This fulfils the
agenda of growth in sales by acquiring more customers when people purchase the pill after
seeing or reading about it.
Celebrities and movie actors may get substantial positive coverage from the media after a public
controversy or scandal. The public relations team of celebrities generally work toward positive
image building so that the audience forgets the unpleasant things associated with the person and
remembers the favourable things said in the media about the celebrity. This helps protect the
public image and also helps build a loyal fan base for the celebrity.
https://in.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/agenda-setting-theory
https://www.communicationtheory.org/agenda-setting-theory/
http://zimmer.csufresno.edu/~johnca/spch100/7-4-agenda.htm
helpfulprofessor.com/agenda-setting-theory/
The closer a person believes the opinion held is similar to the prevailing public opinion, the more they
are willing to openly disclose that opinion in public. Then, if public sentiment changes, the person will
recognize that the opinion is less in favour and will be less willing to express that opinion publicly. As the
perceived distance between public opinion and a person's personal opinion grows, the more unlikely the
person is to express their opinion.
Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann, the German political scientist contributes the famous model called “Spiral of
Silence”. In 1947 Neumann and her husband found “Public Opinion Organization” in German and also
she was a President of “World Association for Public Opinion Research” in 1978 to 1980. Through this
Spiral of Silence theory Neumann indirectly explains the Jews status during World War II under Nazi’s
control. Here, Adolf Hitler dominated the whole society and the minority Jews became silent due to the
fear of isolation or separation.
Source: Noelle-Neumann (1991).
Scope and Application
It is related to the mass media, in such a way that mass media influences public opinion. Shifts in public
opinion occur commonly and therefore this theory is used to search an explanation for behavior (speak
up or stay silent).
The theory has also been criticized for ambiguity and methodological weakness, but the idea has
persisted. Evidence of the spiral effect is usually small but significant.
Example- This example shows an effect of the theory where during the 1991 Gulf War the U.S. support
for the war was measured. Either it is a consensus view or did media coverage contribute to a spiral of
silence that dampened opposition to the war? In a survey that asked about people’s opinions,
respondents were clearly less supportive of the war than the popular support depicted by the media.
Those who watched television and perceived that the public supported the war, were more likely to
support the war themselves. This study supports the spiral of silence and suggests that people are
swayed by bandwagon effects rather than fearing social isolation.
Example:
In a company, the managing director decides to increase their working hour from 8 to 10 and
send e-mail to all employees. Majority of them accept this time changes and few employees are
not satisfied with his decision. But they cannot or ready to express their thought publicly.
Because
1. They may feel unsupported by the other employees.
3. “Fear of Rejection” By rejecting their personal opinion from the public will help to avoid
fight.
4. They may try to save their job by suppressing or avoid personal statement in public.
2. In this social environment, People have fear of rejection to express their opinion or views
and they known well what behaviors will make a better likelihood. It’s called “fear of Isolation”.
3. Being the part of Minority. People loss their confidence and silent or mute to express their
views because of the fear of isolation or they feel alone or unsupported.
4. Sometimes the minorities withdraw their expressed opinion from public debates to secure
themselves from the majority.
5. Maximum numbers get more vocal space in the society and lesser number become less vocal
space or become silent.
3. Spiral of silence theory – which helps to raise question about considering the role and
responsibility of media in the society.
4. The theory which is not considering the other explanation of silencing. In some cases the
person may feel the majority’s ideas or opinion is much better than his own view.
https://www.communicationtheory.org/the-spiral-of-silence-theory/