FPSO Motion Load - Vertical

1 OF 109
UOP Process Plants Specification

G6135-414-20-CA-00-ULP R5
H2S Removal Guard Bed Calculations –
GAS TREATMENT PKG
UOP PROJECT NO. : G6135
EQUIPMENT : GAS TREATMENT UNIT
CLIENT : BW OFFSHORE
END CLIENT : PREMIER OIL UK LIMITED
CLIENT REF. NO. : 4307
LOCATION : NORTH SEA
PURCHASE ORDER NO. : 60407
No. of pages
109
Project: CATCHER DEVELOPMENT Document Family: ANST

Unit: Doc. type: CA
IMO No: 9777280 Discipline: M
Client: PREMIER OIL UK LIMITED System no: 24
Client Doc No: BWO Doc. No.: 4307-UOP-EM311-M-CA-00004
5 12.06.2015 Ikhan Cho Ilseop Eom Jinyeol Jeon

REVISION DATE PREPARER CHECKER APPROVER
2/109
I N D E X
No. SUBJECT PAGE
1 INDEX 2
2 DESIGN DATA 3
3 SETTING SUMMARY 4
4 PRESSURE SUMMARY 5
5 NOZZLE SCHEDULE 6
6 NOZZLE SUMMARY 7
7 THICKNESS SUMMARY 8 ~ 10
8 SHELL & HEAD 11 ~ 23
9 NOZZLE 24 ~ 35
10 WEIGHT SUMMARY 36
11 WIND LOAD 37 ~ 41
12 WAVE MOTION LOAD 42 ~ 49
13 BLAST LOAD 50 ~ 52
14 SKIRT & BASE RING 53 ~ 61
15 LIFTING & TAILING LUG 62 ~ 68
16 BRACE CHECK 69 ~ 71
17 LIFTING & TAILING LUG LOCAL CHECK 72 ~ 74
18 TOP DAVIT 75 ~ 78
19 HYDRO. TEST REPORT 79 ~ 81
20 CHECK OF STUD BOLT 82
21 N1 NOZZLE NECK & HOOK 83
22 ㅣ STRESS ANALYSIS REPORT FOR TAILING LUG | 84 ~ 109

3/109
ITEM NO. : 24-VF-6723A/B
DESIGN INPUT DATA

CODE ASME SEC.Ⅷ DIV.1 2013 ED. + PED 97/23/EC MODULE G + CE MARKING
CLASSIFICATION SOCIETY INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION BODY (ICP) : DNV GL

SIZE I.D 2345 x 3500 L (T.L TO T.L)
VOLUME 18.5 M3 TYPE V-SKIRT
NO. OF EQUIP. 2 CODE STAMPING NO
FLUID NATURAL GAS -

SPECIFIC GRAVITY - -
DESIGN PRESSURE (INT./EXT.) 89 / F.V Bar.G
DESIGN TEMPERATURE (MAX./M.D.M.T) 85 / -45 ℃
OPERATING PRESSURE (INT./EXT.) 69 / ATM. Bar.G
OPERATING TEMPERATURE 50 ℃
HYDRO. TEST PRESSURE 1ࣱ࣯࣯࣪ Bar.G
PNEUMATIC TEST PRESSURE - Bar.G
CORROSION ALLOWANCE 3.0 MM
S.R AFTER COLD FORMING - -
P.W.H.T. YES -
RADIOGRAPHY (SHELL/HEAD) 100% / 100% -
JOINT EFFICIENCY (SHELL/HEAD) 1.0 / 1.0 -
INSULATION 80 MM
FIRE PROOFING (IN/OUT) NONE MM
M.D.M.T. -45 ℃
M.A.W.P. 89 Bar.G
BLAST PRESSURE 0.6 Bar
WIND VELOCITY 33.5 M/S
OPERATING ACCELERATION SEE NOTE 1 -
NOTE
1. HEAVE = 1.3162g, PITCH = 0.1499g, ROLL = 0.416
2. MATERIAL ACCORDING TO NACE MR0175

Settings Summary 4/109
COMPRESS 2014 Build 7400
Units: MKS
Datum Line Location: -50.00 mm from bottom seam
Design
ASME Section VIII Division 1, 2013 Edition Metric
Design or Rating: Get Thickness from Pressure

Minimum thickness: 1.5 mm per UG-16(b)
Design for cold shut down only: No
Design for lethal service (full radiography required): No
Design nozzles for: Design P only
Corrosion weight loss: 100% of theoretical loss
UG-23 Stress Increase: 1.20
Skirt/legs stress increase: 1.2
Minimum nozzle projection: 150 mm
Juncture calculations for α > 30 only: Yes
Preheat P-No 1 Materials > 1.25" and <= 1.50" thick: Yes
UG-37(a) shell tr calculation considers longitudinal stress: No
Butt welds are tapered per Figure UCS-66.3(a).
Hydro/Pneumatic Test
Shop Hydrotest at user defined pressure

Test liquid specific gravity: 1.00
Maximum stress during test: 90% of yield
Required Marking - UG-116
UG-116(e) Radiography: RT1

UG-116(f) Postweld heat treatment: HT
Code Cases\Interpretations
Use Code Case 2547: No

Use Code Case 2695: No
Apply interpretation VIII-1-83-66: Yes
No UCS-66.1 MDMT reduction: No
No UCS-68(c) MDMT reduction: No
Disallow UG-20(f) exemptions: No
UG-22 Loadings
UG-22(a) Internal or External Design Pressure : Yes

UG-22(b) Weight of the vessel and normal contents under operating or test conditions: Yes
UG-22(c) Superimposed static reactions from weight of attached equipment (external loads): Yes
UG-22(d)(2) Vessel supports such as lugs, rings, skirts, saddles and legs: Yes
UG-22(f) Wind reactions: Yes
UG-22(f) Seismic reactions: Yes
UG-22(j) Test pressure and coincident static head acting during the test: Yes
Note: UG-22(b),(c) and (f) loads only considered when supports are present.
Pressure Summary 5/109
Pressure Summary for Chamber bounded by Bottom Head and Top Head
P T T
MAWP MAEP e MDMT MDMT Impact
Identifier Design Design external
( bar) ( bar) ( °C) Exemption Tested
( bar) ( °C) ( °C)
Top Head 89 85 92.92 52.36 85 -51 Note 1 Yes
Straight Flange on Top Head 89 85 99.14 64.72 85 -51 Note 2 Yes
Shell 89 85 90.95 59.46 85 -46.3 Note 3 Yes
Straight Flange on Bottom Head 89 85 99.14 64.72 85 -51 Note 2 Yes
Bottom Head 89 85 92.92 52.36 85 -51 Note 4 Yes
Nozzle (MW1) 89 85 89 1.03 85 -49 Note 5 No
Nozzle (MW2) 89 85 89 1.03 85 -49 Note 6 No
Nozzle (N2) 89 85 89 1.03 85 -49 Note 7 No
Chamber design MDMT is -45 °C

Chamber rated MDMT is -46.3 °C @ 89 bar
Chamber MAWP hot & corroded is 89 bar @ 85 °C
Chamber MAEP is 1.03 bar @ 85 °C

Vacuum rings did not govern the external pressure rating.
Notes for Maximum Pressure Rating:
Note # Details
1. Option to calculate MAP was not selected. See the Calculation->General tab of the Set Mode dialog.
Notes for MDMT Rating:
Note # Exemption Details
1. Straight Flange governs MDMT
UCS-66(i) reduction of 6 °C applied (ratio =

2. Material is impact tested per UG-84 to -45 °C
0.8929).
UCS-66(i) reduction of 1.3 °C applied (ratio =

3. Material is impact tested per UG-84 to -45 °C
0.9775).
4. Straight Flange governs MDMT
5. Nozzle is impact tested to -46 °C with an additional 3 °C reduction per UCS-66(g) UCS-66 governing thickness = 98 mm.
6. Nozzle is impact tested to -46 °C with an additional 3 °C reduction per UCS-66(g) UCS-66 governing thickness = 96.3 mm.
7. Nozzle is impact tested to -46 °C with an additional 3 °C reduction per UCS-66(g) UCS-66 governing thickness = 78.55 mm.
Design notes are available on the Settings Summary page.

Nozzle Schedule 6/109
Nozzle Impact
Service Size Materials Normalized Fine Grain Flange Blind
mark Tested
NPS 24 Class 600 NPS 24 Class 600

MW1 Nozzle 547.6 ID x 136.2 Nozzle SA-350 LF2 Cl 1 No No No
WN A350 LF2 Cl.1 A350 LF2 Cl.1
NPS 24 Class 600 NPS 24 Class 600

MW2 Nozzle 547.6 ID x 116.2 Nozzle SA-350 LF2 Cl 1 No No No
WN A350 LF2 Cl.1 A350 LF2 Cl.1
NPS 10 Class 600

N2 Nozzle 242.9 ID x 78.55 Nozzle SA-350 LF2 Cl 1 No No No No
WN A350 LF2 Cl.1
Nozzle Summary 7/109
Reinforcement
Shell
Nozzle OD t Req t Pad Corr A /A
n n A1? A2? a r
mark (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (%)
Nom t Design t User t Width t
pad
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
MW1 820 136.2 21.57 Yes Yes 98 95.86 N/A N/A 3 108.1
MW2 780 116.2 21.57 Yes Yes 96.3* 83.2 N/A N/A 3 109.3
N2 400 78.55 11.35 Yes Yes 96.3* 83.2 N/A N/A 3 116.9
tn: Nozzle thickness

Req tn: Nozzle thickness required per UG-45/UG-16
Nom t: Vessel wall thickness
Design t: Required vessel wall thickness due to pressure + corrosion allowance per UG-37
User t: Local vessel wall thickness (near opening)
Aa: Area available per UG-37, governing condition
Ar: Area required per UG-37, governing condition
Corr: Corrosion allowance on nozzle wall
* Head minimum thickness after forming
Thickness Summary1RUPDO2SHUDWLQJ&RQGLWLRQ 8/109
Component Material Diameter Length Nominal t Design t Total Corrosion Joint Load
Identifier (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) E
Top Head SA-516 60 2,345 ID 682.55 96.3* 92.34 3 1.00 Internal
Straight Flange on Top Head SA-516 60 2,345 ID 50 107 95.86 3 1.00 Internal
Shell SA-516 60 2,345 ID 3,400 98 95.86 3 1.00 Internal
Straight Flange on Bottom Head SA-516 60 2,345 ID 50 107 95.86 3 1.00 Internal
Bottom Head SA-516 60 2,345 ID 682.55 96.3* 92.34 3 1.00 Internal
Skirt SA-516 60 2,459 OD 1,895.5 16 2.62 0 0.55 Seismic
Nominal t: Vessel wall nominal thickness

Design t: Required vessel thickness due to governing loading + corrosion
Joint E: Longitudinal seam joint efficiency
Load
internal: Circumferential stress due to internal pressure governs
external: External pressure governs
Wind: Combined longitudinal stress of pressure + weight + wind governs
Seismic: Combined longitudinal stress of pressure + weight + seismic governs
Thickness Summary(QYLURQPHQWDO/RDG&RQGLWLRQ 9/109
Skirt SA-516 60 2,459 OD 1,895.5 16 3.14 0 0.55 Seismic

Load
Thickness Summary%ODVW&RQGLWLRQ 10/109
Skirt SA-516 60 2,459 OD 1,895.5 16 6.42 0 0.55 Wind

Load
Top Head 11/109
Component: Ellipsoidal Head

Material Specification: SA-516 60 (II-D Metric p.14, ln. 6)
Straight Flange governs MDMT
Internal design pressure: P = 89 bar @ 85 °C

External design pressure: Pe = 1.03 bar @ 85 °C
Static liquid head:
Ps= 0 bar (SG=1, Hs=0 mm Operating head)

Pth= 0.23 bar (SG=1, Hs=2345 mm Horizontal test head)
Corrosion allowance: Inner C = 3 mm Outer C = 0 mm
Design MDMT = -45°C Impact test performed

Rated MDMT = -51°C Material is normalized
Material is produced to fine grain practice
PWHT is performed
Do not Optimize MDMT / Find MAWP
Radiography: Category A joints - Seamless No RT

Head to shell seam - Full UW-11(a) Type 1
Estimated weight*: new = 5,247.2 kg corr = 5,100.5 kg

Capacity*: new = 1,903.9 liters corr = 1,922.4 liters
* includes straight flange
Inner diameter = 2345 mm

Minimum head thickness = 96.3 mm
Head ratio D/2h = 2 (new)
Head ratio D/2h = 1.9949 (corroded)
Straight flange length Lsf = 50 mm
Nominal straight flange thickness tsf = 107 mm
Insulation thk*: 80 mm density: 220 kg/m3 weight: 140.1551 kg

Insulation support ring spacing: 0 mm individual weight: 0 kg total weight: 0 kg
* includes straight flange if applicable
Results Summary
The governing condition is internal pressure.

Minimum thickness per UG-16 = 1.5 mm + 3 mm = 4.5 mm
Design thickness due to internal pressure (t) = 92.34 mm
Design thickness due to external pressure (te) = 9.12 mm
Maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP) = 92.92 bar
Maximum allowable external pressure (MAEP) = 52.36 bar
Design thickness for internal pressure, (Corroded at 85 °C) UG-32(d)(1)
t = P*D / (2*S*E - 0.2*P) + Corrosion

= 89*2,351 / (2*1,180*1 - 0.2*89) + 3
= 92.33 mm
The head internal pressure design thickness is 92.34 mm.
Maximum allowable working pressure, (Corroded at 85 °C) UG-32(d)(1)
P = 2*S*E*t / (D + 0.2*t) - Ps
= 2*1,180*1*93.3 / (2,351 +0.2*93.3) - 0
= 92.92 bar
12/109
The maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP) is 92.92 bar.
Design thickness for external pressure, (Corroded at 85 °C) UG-33(d)
Equivalent outside spherical radius (Ro)

Ro = Ko*Do
= 0.8365*2,537.6
= 2,122.73 mm
A = 0.125 / (Ro / t)
= 0.125 / (2,122.73 / 6.12)
= 0.00036
From Table CS-2 364.2902

B =
Metric: kgf/cm2
Pa = B / (Ro / t)
= 357.247 / (2,122.73 / 6.12)
= 1.03 bar
t = 6.12 mm + Corrosion = 6.12 mm + 3 mm = 9.12 mm

Check the external pressure per UG-33(a)(1) UG-32(d)(1)
t = 1.67*Pe*D / (2*S*E - 0.2*1.67*Pe) + Corrosion

= 1.67*1.03*2,351 / (2*1,180*1 - 0.2*1.67*1.03) + 3
= 4.71 mm
The head external pressure design thickness (te) is 9.12 mm.
Maximum Allowable External Pressure, (Corroded at 85 °C) UG-33(d)

Ro = Ko*Do
= 0.8365*2,537.6
= 2,122.73 mm
A = 0.125 / (Ro / t)
= 0.125 / (2,122.73 / 93.3)
= 0.005494
From Table CS-2 1,214.6462

B =
Metric: kgf/cm2
Pa = B / (Ro / t)
= 1,191.1619 / (2,122.73 / 93.3)
= 52.3551 bar
Check the Maximum External Pressure, UG-33(a)(1) UG-32(d)(1)
P = 2*S*E*t / ((D + 0.2*t)*1.67) - Ps2

= 2*1,180*1*93.3 / ((2,351 +0.2*93.3)*1.67) - 0
= 55.64 bar
The maximum allowable external pressure (MAEP) is 52.36 bar.
% Extreme fiber elongation - UCS-79(d)
EFE = (75*t / Rf)*(1 - Rf / Ro)

= (75*107 / 452.15)*(1 - 452.15 / infinity)
= 17.7485%
Shell1RUPDO2SHUDWLQJ&RQGLWLRQ 13/109
Component: Cylinder
Material specification: SA-516 60 (II-D Metric p. 14, ln. 6)
Material is impact tested per UG-84 to -45 °C
UCS-66(i) reduction of 1.3 °C applied (ratio = 0.9775).

Static liquid head:
(SG = 1, Hs = 2,345 mm, Horizontal

Pth = 0.23 bar
test head)
Corrosion allowance Inner C = 3 mm Outer C = 0 mm
Design MDMT = -45 °C Impact test performed

Rated MDMT = -46.3 °C Material is normalized
Material is produced to Fine Grain Practice
PWHT is performed
Radiography: Longitudinal joint - Full UW-11(a) Type 1

Top circumferential joint - Full UW-11(a) Type 1
Bottom circumferential joint - Full UW-11(a) Type 1
Estimated weight New = 19,625.8 kg corr = 19,048.9 kg

Capacity New = 14,684.34 liters corr = 14,759.58 liters
ID = 2,345 mm
Length
= 3,400 mm
Lc
t = 98 mm
Insulation thk: 80 mm density: 220 kg/m3 Weight: 492.7 kg
Design thickness, (at 85 °C) UG-27(c)(1)
t = P*R / (S*E - 0.60*P) + Corrosion

= 89*1,175.5 / (1,180*1.00 - 0.60*89) + 3
= 95.86 mm
Maximum allowable working pressure, (at 85 °C) UG-27(c)(1)
P = S*E*t / (R + 0.60*t) - Ps
= 1,180*1.00*95 / (1,175.5 + 0.60*95) - 0
= 90.95 bar
External Pressure, (Corroded & at 85 °C) UG-28(c)
L / Do = 3,892.83 / 2,541 = 1.5320

Do / t = 2,541 / 9.74 = 260.8466
From table G: A = 0.000204
From table CS-2
B = 205.4774 kg/cm2 (201.5 bar)
Metric:
Pa = 4*B / (3*(Do / t))

= 4*201.5 / (3*(2,541 / 9.74))
= 1.03 bar
Design thickness for external pressure Pa = 1.03 bar
= 12.74
ta = t + Corrosion = 9.74 + 3
mm
Maximum Allowable External Pressure, (Corroded & at 85 °C) UG-28(c) 14/109
L / Do = 3,892.83 / 2,541 = 1.5320

Do / t = 2,541 / 95 = 26.7473
From table CS-2
B = 1,216.3317 kg/cm2 (1,192.8111 bar)
Metric:
Pa = 4*B / (3*(Do / t))

= 4*1,192.81 / (3*(2,541 / 95))
= 59.46 bar
EFE = (50*t / Rf)*(1 - Rf / Ro)

= (50*98 / 1,221.5)*(1 - 1,221.5 / infinity)
= 4.0115%
The extreme fiber elongation does not exceed 5%.
External Pressure + Weight + Wind Loading Check (Bergman, ASME paper 54-A-104)
Pv = W / (2*π*Rm) + M / (π*Rm2)
= 10*31,126.7 / (2*π*1,223) + 10000*5,279.8 / (π*1,2232)
= 51.7428 kg/cm
α = Pv / (Pe*Do)
= 9.803*51.7428 / (1.03*2,541)
= 0.1939
n = 3
m = 1.23 / (L / Do)2
= 1.23 / (3,892.83 / 2,541)2
= 0.5241
Ratio Pe = (n2 - 1 + m + m*α) / (n2 - 1 + m)
= (32 - 1 + 0.5241 + 0.5241*0.1939) / (32 - 1 + 0.5241)
= 1.0119
Ratio Pe * Pe ≤ MAEP design cylinder thickness is satisfactory.
External Pressure + Weight + Seismic Loading Check (Bergman, ASME paper 54-A-104)
Pv = (1 + VAccel)*W / (2*π*Rm) + M / (π*Rm2)

= 1.28*10*31,126.7 / (2*π*1,223) + 10000*51,755.9 / (π*1,2232)
= 162.0322 kg/cm
α = Pv / (Pe*Do)
= 9.803*162.0322 / (1.03*2,541)
= 0.6071
n = 3
m = 1.23 / (L / Do)2
= 1.23 / (3,892.83 / 2,541)2
= 0.5241
Ratio Pe = (n2 - 1 + m + m*α) / (n2 - 1 + m)
= (32 - 1 + 0.5241 + 0.5241*0.6071) / (32 - 1 + 0.5241)
= 1.0373
Design thickness = 95.86 mm
The governing condition is due to internal pressure.

The cylinder thickness of 98 mm is adequate. 15/109
Thickness Required Due to Pressure + External Loads
Allowable Stress
Before UG-23
Corrosion C Req'd Thk Due to Tension Req'd Thk Due to
Condition Pressure P ( bar) Stress Increase ( Temperature ( °C) Load
(mm) (mm) Compression (mm)
kg/cm2)
St Sc
Wind 36.39 36.13

Operating, Hot & Corroded 89 1,203.3 1,203.3 85 3
Seismic 36.97 35.36
Wind 36.3 36.02

Operating, Hot & New 89 1,203.3 1,203.3 85 0
Seismic 36.88 35.24
Wind 0.09 0.36

Hot Shut Down, Corroded 0 1,203.3 1,203.3 85 3
Seismic 0.48 1.12
Wind 0.09 0.37

Hot Shut Down, New 0 1,203.3 1,203.3 85 0
Seismic 0.49 1.15
Wind 0.09 0.35

Empty, Corroded 0 1,203.3 1,203.3 21.11 3
Seismic 0.28 0.9
Wind 0.09 0.36

Empty, New 0 1,203.3 1,203.3 21.11 0
Seismic 0.28 0.92
Wind 0.52 0.79

Vacuum -1.03 1,203.3 1,203.3 85 3
Seismic 0.05 1.55
Hot Shut Down, Corroded, Weight & Eccentric

0 1,203.3 1,203.3 85 3 Weight 0.27 0.41
Moments Only
Shell(QYLURQPHQWDO/RDG&RQGLWLRQ 16/109
Component: Cylinder

Static liquid head:

Pth = 0.23 bar
test head)

PWHT is performed


ID = 2,345 mm
Length
= 3,400 mm
Lc
t = 98 mm

= 89*1,175.5 / (1,180*1.00 - 0.60*89) + 3
= 95.86 mm
P = S*E*t / (R + 0.60*t) - Ps
= 1,180*1.00*95 / (1,175.5 + 0.60*95) - 0
= 90.95 bar
L / Do = 3,892.83 / 2,541 = 1.5320

Do / t = 2,541 / 9.74 = 260.8466
From table CS-2
B = 205.4774 kg/cm2 (201.5 bar)
Metric:
Pa = 4*B / (3*(Do / t))

= 4*201.5 / (3*(2,541 / 9.74))
= 1.03 bar
= 12.74
mm
L / Do = 3,892.83 / 2,541 = 1.5320

Do / t = 2,541 / 95 = 26.7473
From table CS-2
B = 1,216.3317 kg/cm2 (1,192.8111 bar)
Metric:
Pa = 4*B / (3*(Do / t))

= 4*1,192.81 / (3*(2,541 / 95))
= 59.46 bar
EFE = (50*t / Rf)*(1 - Rf / Ro)

= (50*98 / 1,221.5)*(1 - 1,221.5 / infinity)
= 4.0115%
Pv = W / (2*π*Rm) + M / (π*Rm2)
= 10*31,126.7 / (2*π*1,223) + 10000*5,279.8 / (π*1,2232)
= 51.7428 kg/cm
α = Pv / (Pe*Do)
= 9.803*51.7428 / (1.03*2,541)
= 0.1939
n = 3
m = 1.23 / (L / Do)2
= 1.23 / (3,892.83 / 2,541)2
= 0.5241
Ratio Pe = (n2 - 1 + m + m*α) / (n2 - 1 + m)
= (32 - 1 + 0.5241 + 0.5241*0.1939) / (32 - 1 + 0.5241)
= 1.0119
External Pressure + Weight + Seismic Loading Check (Bergman, ASME paper 54-A-104)
Pv = (1 + VAccel)*W / (2*π*Rm) + M / (π*Rm2)

= 1.32*10*31,126.7 / (2*π*1,223) + 10000*65,533 / (π*1,2232)
= 192.7773 kg/cm
α = Pv / (Pe*Do)
= 9.803*192.7773 / (1.03*2,541)
= 0.7223
n = 3
m = 1.23 / (L / Do)2
= 1.23 / (3,892.83 / 2,541)2
= 0.5241
Ratio Pe = (n2 - 1 + m + m*α) / (n2 - 1 + m)
= (32 - 1 + 0.5241 + 0.5241*0.7223) / (32 - 1 + 0.5241)
= 1.0444

The cylinder thickness of 98 mm is adequate. 18/109
Thickness Required Due to Pressure + External Loads
Allowable Stress
Before UG-23
Corrosion C Req'd Thk Due to Tension Req'd Thk Due to
Condition Pressure P ( bar) Stress Increase ( Temperature ( °C) Load
(mm) (mm) Compression (mm)
kg/cm2)
St Sc
Wind 36.39 36.13

Operating, Hot & Corroded 89 1,203.3 1,203.3 85 3
Seismic 37.17 35.15
Wind 36.3 36.02

Operating, Hot & New 89 1,203.3 1,203.3 85 0
Seismic 37.09 35.03
Wind 0.09 0.36

Hot Shut Down, Corroded 0 1,203.3 1,203.3 85 3
Seismic 0.69 1.34
Wind 0.09 0.37

Hot Shut Down, New 0 1,203.3 1,203.3 85 0
Seismic 0.7 1.36
Wind 0.09 0.35

Empty, Corroded 0 1,203.3 1,203.3 21.11 3
Seismic 0.42 1.05
Wind 0.09 0.36

Empty, New 0 1,203.3 1,203.3 21.11 0
Seismic 0.43 1.08
Wind 0.52 0.79

Vacuum -1.03 1,203.3 1,203.3 85 3
Seismic 0.26 1.76

0 1,203.3 1,203.3 85 3 Weight 0.27 0.41
Moments Only
Shell%ODVW&RQGLWLRQ 19/109
Component: Cylinder

Static liquid head:

Pth = 0.23 bar
test head)

PWHT is performed


ID = 2,345 mm
Length
= 3,400 mm
Lc
t = 98 mm

= 89*1,175.5 / (1,180*1.00 - 0.60*89) + 3
= 95.86 mm
P = S*E*t / (R + 0.60*t) - Ps
= 1,180*1.00*95 / (1,175.5 + 0.60*95) - 0
= 90.95 bar
L / Do = 3,892.83 / 2,541 = 1.5320

Do / t = 2,541 / 9.74 = 260.8466
From table CS-2
B = 205.4774 kg/cm2 (201.5 bar)
Metric:
Pa = 4*B / (3*(Do / t))

= 4*201.5 / (3*(2,541 / 9.74))
= 1.03 bar
= 12.74
mm
L / Do = 3,892.83 / 2,541 = 1.5320

Do / t = 2,541 / 95 = 26.7473
From table CS-2
B = 1,216.3317 kg/cm2 (1,192.8111 bar)
Metric:
Pa = 4*B / (3*(Do / t))

= 4*1,192.81 / (3*(2,541 / 95))
= 59.46 bar
EFE = (50*t / Rf)*(1 - Rf / Ro)

= (50*98 / 1,221.5)*(1 - 1,221.5 / infinity)
= 4.0115%
Pv = W / (2*π*Rm) + M / (π*Rm2)
= 10*31,127.7 / (2*π*1,223) + 10000*118,381.5 / (π*1,2232)
= 292.4386 kg/cm
α = Pv / (Pe*Do)
= 9.803*292.4386 / (1.03*2,541)
= 1.0958
n = 3
m = 1.23 / (L / Do)2
= 1.23 / (3,892.83 / 2,541)2
= 0.5241
Ratio Pe = (n2 - 1 + m + m*α) / (n2 - 1 + m)
= (32 - 1 + 0.5241 + 0.5241*1.0958) / (32 - 1 + 0.5241)
= 1.0674
The cylinder thickness of 98 mm is adequate.

Thickness Required Due to Pressure + External Loads 21/109
Allowable Stress
Before UG-23
Req'd Thk Due to Tension Req'd Thk Due to
Condition Pressure P ( bar) Stress Increase ( Temperature ( °C) Corrosion C (mm) Load
(mm) Compression (mm)
kg/cm2)
St Sc
Operating, Hot & Corroded 89 1,203.3 1,203.3 85 3 Wind 37.95 34.46
Operating, Hot & New 89 1,203.3 1,203.3 85 0 Wind 37.85 34.35
Hot Shut Down, Corroded 0 1,203.3 1,203.3 85 3 Wind 1.46 2.03
Hot Shut Down, New 0 1,203.3 1,203.3 85 0 Wind 1.46 2.04
Empty, Corroded 0 1,203.3 1,203.3 21.11 3 Wind 1.38 1.93
Empty, New 0 1,203.3 1,203.3 21.11 0 Wind 1.38 1.94
Vacuum -1.03 1,203.3 1,203.3 85 3 Wind 1.04 2.45

0 1,203.3 1,203.3 85 3 Weight 0.27 0.41
Moments Only
Bottom Head 22/109
Component: Ellipsoidal Head

Material Specification: SA-516 60 (II-D Metric p.14, ln. 6)
Straight Flange governs MDMT

Static liquid head:
Ps= 0 bar (SG=1, Hs=0 mm Operating head)

Pth= 0.23 bar (SG=1, Hs=2345 mm Horizontal test head)
Corrosion allowance: Inner C = 3 mm Outer C = 0 mm
Design MDMT = -45°C Impact test performed

Rated MDMT = -51°C Material is normalized
Material is produced to fine grain practice
PWHT is performed
Do not Optimize MDMT / Find MAWP
Radiography: Category A joints - Seamless No RT

Head to shell seam - Full UW-11(a) Type 1
Estimated weight*: new = 5,512.9 kg corr = 5,357.8 kg

Capacity*: new = 1,903.9 liters corr = 1,922.4 liters
* includes straight flange
Inner diameter = 2345 mm

Minimum head thickness = 96.3 mm
Head ratio D/2h = 2 (new)
Head ratio D/2h = 1.9949 (corroded)
Straight flange length Lsf = 50 mm
Nominal straight flange thickness tsf = 107 mm
Insulation thk*: 80 mm density: 220 kg/m3 weight: 140.1551 kg

Insulation support ring spacing: 0 mm individual weight: 0 kg total weight: 0 kg
* includes straight flange if applicable
Results Summary
The governing condition is internal pressure.

Minimum thickness per UG-16 = 1.5 mm + 3 mm = 4.5 mm
Design thickness due to internal pressure (t) = 92.34 mm
Design thickness due to external pressure (te) = 9.12 mm
Maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP) = 92.92 bar
Maximum allowable external pressure (MAEP) = 52.36 bar
Design thickness for internal pressure, (Corroded at 85 °C) UG-32(d)(1)
t = P*D / (2*S*E - 0.2*P) + Corrosion

= 89*2,351 / (2*1,180*1 - 0.2*89) + 3
= 92.33 mm
The head internal pressure design thickness is 92.34 mm.
Maximum allowable working pressure, (Corroded at 85 °C) UG-32(d)(1)
P = 2*S*E*t / (D + 0.2*t) - Ps
= 2*1,180*1*93.3 / (2,351 +0.2*93.3) - 0
= 92.92 bar
23/109
The maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP) is 92.92 bar.
Design thickness for external pressure, (Corroded at 85 °C) UG-33(d)

Ro = Ko*Do
= 0.8365*2,537.6
= 2,122.73 mm
A = 0.125 / (Ro / t)
= 0.125 / (2,122.73 / 6.12)
= 0.00036
From Table CS-2 364.2902

B =
Metric: kgf/cm2
Pa = B / (Ro / t)
= 357.247 / (2,122.73 / 6.12)
= 1.03 bar
t = 6.12 mm + Corrosion = 6.12 mm + 3 mm = 9.12 mm

Check the external pressure per UG-33(a)(1) UG-32(d)(1)
t = 1.67*Pe*D / (2*S*E - 0.2*1.67*Pe) + Corrosion

= 1.67*1.03*2,351 / (2*1,180*1 - 0.2*1.67*1.03) + 3
= 4.71 mm
The head external pressure design thickness (te) is 9.12 mm.
Maximum Allowable External Pressure, (Corroded at 85 °C) UG-33(d)

Ro = Ko*Do
= 0.8365*2,537.6
= 2,122.73 mm
A = 0.125 / (Ro / t)
= 0.125 / (2,122.73 / 93.3)
= 0.005494
From Table CS-2 1,214.6462

B =
Metric: kgf/cm2
Pa = B / (Ro / t)
= 1,191.1619 / (2,122.73 / 93.3)
= 52.3551 bar
Check the Maximum External Pressure, UG-33(a)(1) UG-32(d)(1)
P = 2*S*E*t / ((D + 0.2*t)*1.67) - Ps2

= 2*1,180*1*93.3 / ((2,351 +0.2*93.3)*1.67) - 0
= 55.64 bar
The maximum allowable external pressure (MAEP) is 52.36 bar.
EFE = (75*t / Rf)*(1 - Rf / Ro)

= (75*107 / 452.15)*(1 - 452.15 / infinity)
= 17.7485%
N1 Nozzle Neck 24/109
Component: Cylinder
Material specification: SA-333 6 Wld & smls pipe (II-D Metric p. 14, ln. 22)
Pipe Description: NPS 10 Sch 80 DN 250
Material is impact tested to -45 °C with an additional 3 °C reduction per UCS-66(g)
UCS-66 governing thickness = 13.2 mm

Static liquid head:
(SG = 1, Hs = 242.87 mm, Horizontal test

Pth = 0.02 bar
head)
Design MDMT = -45 °C No impact test performed

Rated MDMT = -48 °C Material is not normalized
Material is not produced to Fine Grain Practice
PWHT is not performed
Radiography: Longitudinal joint - Seamless No RT

Estimated weight New = 36.4 kg corr = 29.5 kg

Capacity New = 17.61 liters corr = 18.49 liters
ID = 242.87 mm
Length
= 380.2 mm
Lc
t = 15.09 mm

= 89*124.43 / (1,180*1.00 - 0.60*89) + 3
= 12.83 mm
P = S*E*t / (R + 0.60*t) - Ps
= 1,180*1.00*(15.09*0.875 - 3) / (124.43 + 0.60*(15.09*0.875 - 3)) - 0
= 92.23 bar
L / Do = 380.2 / 273.05 = 1.3924

Do / t = 273.05 / 1 = 271.9164
From table CS-2
B = 214.1985 kg/cm2 (210.06 bar)
Metric:
Pa = 4*B / (3*(Do / t))

= 4*210.06 / (3*(273.05 / 1))
= 1.03 bar
= 4
ta = t + Corrosion = 1+3
mm
L / Do = 380.2 / 273.05 = 1.3924

Do / t = 273.05 / (15.09*0.875 - 3) = 26.7591
From table CS-2
B = 1,217.6713 kg/cm2 (1,194.1247 bar)
Metric:
Pa = 4*B / (3*(Do / t))

= 4*1,194.12 / (3*(273.05 / (15.09*0.875 - 3)))
= 59.5 bar
Nozzle (N2) 26/109
tw(lower) = 96.3 mm
Leg41 = 9 mm
Note: Per UW-16(b) minimum inside corner radius r = min [1 / 4*t , 3 mm] = 3 mm
1
Location and Orientation

Located on: Bottom Head
Orientation: 0°
End of nozzle to datum line: -1,400 mm
Calculated as hillside: No
Distance to head center, R: 0 mm
Passes through a Category A joint: No
Nozzle
Access opening: Yes
Material specification: SA-350 LF2 Cl 1 (II-D Metric p. 18, ln. 37)
Inside diameter, new: 242.9 mm
Wall thickness, tn: 78.55 mm
Minimum wall thickness: 15.1 mm
Corrosion allowance: 3 mm
Projection available outside vessel, Lpr: 567.23 mm
Heavy barrel length, Lhb: 185.8 mm
Projection available outside vessel to flange face, Lf: 725.98 mm
Local vessel minimum thickness: 96.3 mm
Liquid static head included: 0 bar
Longitudinal joint efficiency: 1
ASME B16.5-2009 Flange

Description: NPS 10 Class 600 WN A350 LF2 Cl.1
Bolt Material: SA-320 L7 Bolt <= 64 (II-D Metric p. 352, ln. 32)
Blind included: No
Rated MDMT: -49°C
(UG-84 provisions apply)
(Flange impact tested to -49°C (UCS-66(g)))
Liquid static head: 0 bar
MAWP rating: 95.3 bar @ 85°C
MAP rating: 102.1 bar @ 10°C
Hydrotest rating: 154 bar @ 10°C
PWHT performed: Yes
Circumferential joint radiography: Full UW-11(a) Type 1 27/109
Reinforcement Calculations for Internal Pressure
UG-45
Nozzle Wall
UG-37 Area Calculation Summary (cm2) Thickness
For P = 89 bar @ 85 °C Summary
The opening is adequately reinforced
(mm)
The nozzle passes
UG-45
A A A
A1 A2 A3 A5 treq tmin
required available welds
199.607 233.4266 44.2541 188.3622 -- -- 0.8103 11.35 15.1
UG-41 Weld Failure Path Analysis Summary

The nozzle is exempt from weld strength calculations per
UW-15(b)(1)
UW-16 Weld Sizing Summary

Required weld Actual weld
Weld description Status
throat size (mm) throat size (mm)
weld size is
Nozzle to shell fillet (Leg41) 6 6.3 adequate
WRC 107
Max Allow
Max Allow
Local Local
P Pr M1 V2 M2 V1 Mt Comb Comb Over
Load Case Primary Primary
(bar) (kgf) (kgf-m) (kgf) (kgf-m) (kgf) (kgf-m) Stress Stress stressed
Stress Stress
(kgf/cm2) (kgf/cm2)
(kgf/cm2) (kgf/cm2)
Load case 1 89 1,346.03 1,409.2 1,346.03 1,409.2 1,346.03 2,113.9 1,098.475 3,609.793 1,036.253 1,804.896 No
Load case 1 (Hot Shut Down) 0 1,346.03 1,409.2 1,346.03 1,409.2 1,346.03 2,113.9 -80.431 3,609.793 -7.734 1,804.896 No
Load case 1 (Pr Reversed) 89 -1,346.03 1,409.2 1,346.03 1,409.2 1,346.03 2,113.9 1,113.45 3,609.793 1,040.753 1,804.896 No
Load case 1 (Pr Reversed) (Hot Shut Down) 0 -1,346.03 1,409.2 1,346.03 1,409.2 1,346.03 2,113.9 80.431 3,609.793 7.734 1,804.896 No
Reinforcement Calculations for External Pressure
UG-45
Nozzle Wall
For Pe = 1.03 bar @ 85 °C Summary
(mm)
The nozzle passes
UG-45
A A A
7.6168 502.37 294.4072 207.1525 -- -- 0.8103 6.04 15.1

Weld strength calculations are not required for external
pressure
UW-16 Weld Sizing Summary 28/109
weld size is
N2 Nozzle Neck 29/109
Component: Cylinder
Material specification: SA-333 6 Wld & smls pipe (II-D Metric p. 14, ln. 22)
Pipe Description: NPS 10 Sch 80 DN 250
Material is impact tested to -45 °C with an additional 3 °C reduction per UCS-66(g)
UCS-66 governing thickness = 13.2 mm

Static liquid head:
(SG = 1, Hs = 242.87 mm, Horizontal test

Pth = 0.02 bar
head)
Design MDMT = -45 °C No impact test performed

Rated MDMT = -48 °C Material is not normalized
Material is not produced to Fine Grain Practice
PWHT is not performed
Radiography: Longitudinal joint - Seamless No RT

Estimated weight New = 146.6 kg corr = 118.8 kg

Capacity New = 70.88 liters corr = 74.43 liters
ID = 242.87 mm
Length
= 1,530 mm
Lc
t = 15.09 mm

= 89*124.43 / (1,180*1.00 - 0.60*89) + 3
= 12.83 mm
P = S*E*t / (R + 0.60*t) - Ps
= 1,180*1.00*(15.09*0.875 - 3) / (124.43 + 0.60*(15.09*0.875 - 3)) - 0
= 92.23 bar
L / Do = 1,530 / 273.05 = 5.6034

Do / t = 273.05 / 1.83 = 149.4747
From table CS-2
B = 117.7459 kg/cm2 (115.47 bar)
Metric:
Pa = 4*B / (3*(Do / t))

= 4*115.47 / (3*(273.05 / 1.83))
= 1.03 bar
= 4.83
mm
L / Do = 1,530 / 273.05 = 5.6034

Do / t = 273.05 / (15.09*0.875 - 3) = 26.7591
From table CS-2
B = 1,013.5758 kg/cm2 (993.9759 bar)
Metric:
Pa = 4*B / (3*(Do / t))

= 4*993.98 / (3*(273.05 / (15.09*0.875 - 3)))
= 49.53 bar
Nozzle (MW2) 31/109
tw(lower) = 96.3 mm
Leg41 = 9 mm
1

Located on: Top Head
Orientation: 0°
End of nozzle to datum line: 4,809 mm
Calculated as hillside: No
Distance to head center, R: 0 mm
Nozzle
Access opening: Yes
Minimum wall thickness: 31 mm
Local vessel minimum thickness: 96.3 mm

Bolt Material: SA-320 L7M Bolt <= 64 (II-D Metric p. 352, ln. 29)
Blind included: Yes
Rated MDMT: -49°C
PWHT performed: Yes
Circumferential joint radiography: Full UW-11(a) Type 1 32/109
Reinforcement Calculations for Internal Pressure
UG-45
Nozzle Wall
(mm)
The nozzle passes
UG-45
A A A
443.9633 485.0848 72.547 411.7276 -- -- 0.8103 21.57 31

UW-15(b)(1)

weld size is
WRC 107
Max Allow
Max Allow
Local Local
P Pr M1 V2 M2 V1 Mt Comb Comb Over
Load Case Primary Primary
(bar) (kgf) (kgf-m) (kgf) (kgf-m) (kgf) (kgf-m) Stress Stress stressed
Stress Stress
(kgf/cm2) (kgf/cm2)
(kgf/cm2) (kgf/cm2)
Load case 1 89 1,346.03 1,409.2 1,346.03 1,409.2 1,346.03 2,113.9 1,054.604 3,609.793 1,035.128 1,804.896 No
Load case 1 (Hot Shut Down) 0 1,346.03 1,409.2 1,346.03 1,409.2 1,346.03 2,113.9 -30.373 3,609.793 -4.5 1,804.896 No
Load case 1 (Pr Reversed) 89 -1,346.03 1,409.2 1,346.03 1,409.2 1,346.03 2,113.9 1,063.392 3,609.793 1,037.519 1,804.896 No
Load case 1 (Pr Reversed) (Hot Shut Down) 0 -1,346.03 1,409.2 1,346.03 1,409.2 1,346.03 2,113.9 30.373 3,609.793 4.5 1,804.896 No
UG-45
Nozzle Wall
(mm)
The nozzle passes
UG-45
A A A
16.9412 965.9039 482.6281 482.4655 -- -- 0.8103 5.31 31

pressure
UW-16 Weld Sizing Summary 33/109
weld size is
Nozzle (MW1) 34/109
tw(lower) = 98 mm
Leg41 = 9 mm
1

Located on: Shell
Orientation: 135°
Nozzle center line offset to datum line: 570 mm
End of nozzle to shell center: 1,925 mm
Nozzle
Access opening: Yes
Minimum wall thickness: 31 mm
Local vessel minimum thickness: 98 mm

Bolt Material: SA-320 L7 Bolt <= 64 (II-D Metric p. 352, ln. 32)
Blind included: Yes
Rated MDMT: -49°C
PWHT performed: Yes
Circumferential joint radiography: Full UW-11(a) Type 1
Reinforcement Calculations for Internal Pressure 35/109
UG-45
Nozzle Wall
(mm)
The nozzle passes
UG-45
A A A
514.0905 555.5389 11.8309 542.8976 -- -- 0.8103 21.57 31

UW-15(b)(1)

weld size is
UG-45
Nozzle Wall
(mm)
The nozzle passes
UG-45
A A A
26.9642 1,092.141 471.9933 619.3375 -- -- 0.8103 5.48 31

pressure

weld size is
Weight Summary 36/109
Weight ( kg) Contributed by Vessel Elements

Component Operating
Metal Metal Insulation Piping Test Liquid
Insulation Lining Liquid
New* Corroded* Supports + Liquid
New Corroded New Corroded
Top Head 5,247.2 5,100.5 140.2 0 0 0 0 0 2,000.4 2,021
Shell 19,625.8 19,048.9 492.7 0 0 0 0 0 14,776.8 14,854.3
Bottom Head 5,512.9 5,357.8 140.2 0 0 0 0 0 1,928.2 1,947.9
Skirt 1,786.7 1,786.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Base Ring 455.4 455.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL: 32,628 31,749.3 773 0 0 0 0 0 18,705.4 18,823.2
* Shells with attached nozzles have weight reduced by material cut out for opening.
Weight ( kg) Contributed by Attachments

Component Nozzles &
Body Flanges
Flanges
Packed Ladders & Trays
Tray Rings & Vertical
Beds Platforms Supports Clips Loads
New Corroded New Corroded
Top Head 0 0 1,802.5 1,774.8 257 0 0 0 0 0
Shell 0 0 2,124.2 2,092.6 17,474.4 0 0 0 0 7,910*
Bottom Head 0 0 307.1 293.2 257 0 0 0 0 0
- Snow Load = 262 kg

Skirt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL: 0 0 4,233.8 4,160.6 17,988.3 0 0 0 0 7,910*

- Others = 7648 kg
* This number includes vertical loads which are not present in all conditions.
Vessel operating weight, Corroded: 57,148 kg

Vessel operating weight, New: 58,100 kg
Vessel empty weight, Corroded: 38,248 kg
Vessel empty weight, New: 39,200 kg
Vessel test weight, New: 63,400 kg
Vessel test weight, Corroded: 62,566 kg
Vessel center of gravity location - from datum - lift condition
Vessel Lift Weight, New: 39,200 kg

Center of Gravity: 1,600.55 mm
Note: Vessel lift weight includes weight of insulation supports as they are assumed to be shop installed.
Vessel Capacity
Vessel Capacity** (New): 18,492 liters

Vessel Capacity** (Corroded): 18,604 liters
**The vessel capacity does not include volume of nozzle, piping or other attachments.
Wind Code 37/109
Building Code: ASCE 7-10

Elevation of base above grade: 147.6378 ft (45.0002 m)
Increase effective outer diameter by: 1.9685 ft (0.6000 m)
Wind Force Coefficient Cf: 0.7000
Risk Category (Table 1.5-1): III
Basic Wind Speed:, V: 74.9374 mph (120.6000 km/h)
Exposure category: C
Wind Directionality Factor, Kd: 0.9500
Top Deflection Limit: 5 mm per m.
Topographic Factor, Kzt: 1.0000
Enforce min. loading of 0.77 kPa: Yes
Vessel Characteristics
Vessel height, h: 20.6941 ft (6.3076 m)
Vessel Minimum Diameter, b
Operating, Corroded: 8.8615 ft (2.7010 m)
Empty, Corroded: 8.3366 ft (2.5410 m)
Hydrotest, Corroded, field: 8.3366 ft (2.5410 m)
Fundamental Frequency, n1
Operating, Corroded: 19.9931 Hz
Empty, Corroded: 24.4196 Hz
Hydrotest, Corroded, field: 19.3181 Hz
Vacuum, Corroded: 19.9931 Hz
Damping coefficient, β
Operating, Corroded: 0.0209
Empty, Corroded: 0.0210
Hydrotest, Corroded, field: 0.0260
Vacuum, Corroded: 0.0209
Table Lookup Values
2.4.1 Basic Load Combinations for Allowable Stress Design

The following load combinations are considered in accordance with ASCE section 2.4.1:
5. D + P + Ps + 0.6W
7. 0.6D + P + Ps + 0.6W
Where
D = Dead load
P = Internal or external pressure load
Ps = Static head load
W = Wind load
Wind Deflection Reports:
Operating, Corroded
Empty, Corroded
Vacuum, Corroded
Hydrotest, Corroded, field
Wind Pressure Calculations
Wind Deflection Report: Operating, Corroded 38/109
Elevation of Platform Total wind bending Deflection

Effective OD Elastic modulus Inertia
Component bottom above wind shear at shear at moment at at top
(m) E (kg/cm²) I (m4)
base (mm) Bottom (kgf) Bottom (kgf) Bottom (kgf-m) (mm)
Top Head 5,575 3.31 2,027,197.2 * 0 95.8 31.4 0.04
Shell 2,175 3.30 2,027,197.2 0.5468 0 621.9 5,279.8 0.03
Bottom Head (top) 1,895.5 3.31 2,027,197.2 * 0 664.6 5,459.7 0.01
Skirt 0 3.06 2,027,197.2 0.09162 0 936.4 6,977 0.01
*Moment of Inertia I varies over the length of the component

Wind Deflection Report: Empty, Corroded

(m) E (kg/cm²) I (m4)
Top Head 5,575 3.31 2,062,603.9 * 0 90.3 29.3 0.03
Shell 2,175 3.30 2,062,603.9 0.5468 0 590.9 5,215.8 0.03
Bottom Head (top) 1,895.5 3.31 2,062,603.9 * 0 631.5 5,386.7 0.01
Skirt 0 3.06 2,062,603.9 0.09162 0 903.3 6,841.3 0.01

Wind Deflection Report: Vacuum, Corroded

(m) E (kg/cm²) I (m4)
Top Head 5,575 3.31 2,027,197.2 * 0 95.8 31.4 0.04
Shell 2,175 3.30 2,027,197.2 0.5468 0 621.9 5,279.8 0.03
Bottom Head (top) 1,895.5 3.31 2,027,197.2 * 0 664.6 5,459.7 0.01
Skirt 0 3.06 2,027,197.2 0.09162 0 936.4 6,977 0.01

Wind Deflection Report: Hydrotest, New, field

(m) E (kg/cm²) I (m4)
Top Head 5,575 3.31 2,070,535.1 * 0 90.3 29.3 0.03
Shell 2,175 3.30 2,070,535.1 0.562 0 590.9 5,276.6 0.03
Bottom Head (top) 1,895.5 3.31 2,070,535.1 * 0 631.5 5,447.5 0.01
Skirt 0 3.06 2,070,535.1 0.09162 0 903.3 6,902.1 0.01

-->
Wind Deflection Report: Hydrotest, Corroded, field 39/109

(m) E (kg/cm²) I (m4)
Top Head 5,575 3.31 2,070,535.1 * 0 90.3 29.3 0.03
Shell 2,175 3.30 2,070,535.1 0.5468 0 590.9 5,215.8 0.03
Bottom Head (top) 1,895.5 3.31 2,070,535.1 * 0 631.5 5,386.7 0.01
Skirt 0 3.06 2,070,535.1 0.09162 0 903.3 6,841.3 0.01
Wind Pressure (WP) Calculations
Gust Factor (G¯) Calculations
Kz = 2.01 * (Z/Zg)2/α
= 2.01 * (Z/274.3200)0.2105
qz = 0.613 * Kz * Kzt * Kd * V2
= 0.613 * Kz * 1.0000 * 0.9500 * 33.50002
= 653.5423 * Kz
WP = 0.6 * qz * G * Cf (Minimum 0.0077 bar)
= 0.6 * qz * G * 0.7000 (Minimum 0.0077 bar)
Design Wind Pressures
Height Z qz WP: Operating WP: Empty WP: Hydrotest New WP: Hydrotest Corroded WP: Vacuum
Kz
(m) (bar) (bar) (bar) (bar) (bar) (bar)
4.6 0.8489 0.0056 0.0046 0.0046 N.A. 0.0046 0.0046
6.1 0.9019 0.0059 0.0046 0.0046 N.A. 0.0046 0.0046
7.6 0.9453 0.0062 0.0046 0.0046 N.A. 0.0046 0.0046
9.1 0.9823 0.0064 0.0046 0.0046 N.A. 0.0046 0.0046
12.2 1.0436 0.0068 0.0046 0.0046 N.A. 0.0046 0.0046
15.2 1.0938 0.0072 0.0046 0.0046 N.A. 0.0046 0.0046
18.3 1.1366 0.0074 0.0046 0.0046 N.A. 0.0046 0.0046
21.3 1.1741 0.0077 0.0046 0.0046 N.A. 0.0046 0.0046
24.4 1.2075 0.0079 0.0046 0.0046 N.A. 0.0046 0.0046
27.4 1.2379 0.0081 0.0046 0.0046 N.A. 0.0046 0.0046
30.5 1.2656 0.0083 0.0046 0.0046 N.A. 0.0046 0.0046
36.6 1.3151 0.0086 0.0046 0.0046 N.A. 0.0046 0.0046
42.7 1.3585 0.0089 0.0046 0.0046 N.A. 0.0046 0.0046
48.8 1.3973 0.0091 0.0046 0.0046 N.A. 0.0046 0.0046
54.9 1.4323 0.0094 0.0046 0.0046 N.A. 0.0046 0.0046
Design Wind Force determined from: F = Pressure * Af , where Af is the projected area.
Height Z(m) Kz qz(bar) WP(bar) %PRESSURESTABLEVOC%

-->
Height Z(m) Kz qz(bar) WP(bar) %PRESSURESTABLEVEC%
-->
Height Z(m) Kz qz(bar) WP(bar) %PRESSURESTABLEVVC%
-->
Gust Factor Calculations 40/109
Operating, Corroded
Empty, Corroded
Vacuum, Corroded
Gust Factor Calculations: Operating, Corroded
Vessel is considered a rigid structure as n1 = 19.9931 Hz ≥ 1 Hz.
z¯ = max ( 0.60 * h , zmin )

= max ( 0.60 * 20.6941 , 15.0000 )
= 15.0000
Iz¯ = c * (33 / z¯)1/6
= 0.2000 * (33 / 15.0000)1/6
= 0.2281
Lz¯ = l * (z¯ / 33)ep
= 500.0000 * (15.0000 / 33)0.2000
= 427.0566
Q = Sqr(1 / (1 + 0.63 * ((b + h) / Lz¯)0.63))
= Sqr(1 / (1 + 0.63 * ((8.8615 + 20.6941) / 427.0566)0.63))
= 0.9461
G = 0.925 * (1 + 1.7 * gQ * Iz¯ * Q) / (1 + 1.7 * gv * Iz¯)
= 0.925 * (1 + 1.7 * 3.40* 0.2281 * 0.9461) / (1 + 1.7 * 3.40 * 0.2281)
= 0.8967
Gust Factor Calculations: Empty, Corroded
z¯ = max ( 0.60 * h , zmin )

= max ( 0.60 * 20.6941 , 15.0000 )
= 15.0000
Iz¯ = c * (33 / z¯)1/6
= 0.2000 * (33 / 15.0000)1/6
= 0.2281
Lz¯ = l * (z¯ / 33)ep
= 500.0000 * (15.0000 / 33)0.2000
= 427.0566
Q = Sqr(1 / (1 + 0.63 * ((b + h) / Lz¯)0.63))
= Sqr(1 / (1 + 0.63 * ((8.8615 + 20.6941) / 427.0566)0.63))
= 0.9467
G = 0.925 * (1 + 1.7 * gQ * Iz¯ * Q) / (1 + 1.7 * gv * Iz¯)
= 0.925 * (1 + 1.7 * 3.40* 0.2281 * 0.9467) / (1 + 1.7 * 3.40 * 0.2281)
= 0.8970
Gust Factor Calculations: Vacuum, Corroded
z¯ = max ( 0.60 * h , zmin )

= max ( 0.60 * 20.6941 , 15.0000 )
= 15.0000
Iz¯ = c * (33 / z¯)1/6
= 0.2000 * (33 / 15.0000)1/6 41/109
= 0.2281
Lz¯ = l * (z¯ / 33)ep
= 500.0000 * (15.0000 / 33)0.2000
= 427.0566
Q = Sqr(1 / (1 + 0.63 * ((b + h) / Lz¯)0.63))
= Sqr(1 / (1 + 0.63 * ((8.8615 + 20.6941) / 427.0566)0.63))
= 0.9461
G = 0.925 * (1 + 1.7 * gQ * Iz¯ * Q) / (1 + 1.7 * gv * Iz¯)
= 0.925 * (1 + 1.7 * 3.40* 0.2281 * 0.9461) / (1 + 1.7 * 3.40 * 0.2281)
= 0.8967
Gust Factor Calculations: Hydrotest, Corroded, field
z¯ = max ( 0.60 * h , zmin )

= max ( 0.60 * 20.6941 , 15.0000 )
= 15.0000
Iz¯ = c * (33 / z¯)1/6
= 0.2000 * (33 / 15.0000)1/6
= 0.2281
Lz¯ = l * (z¯ / 33)ep
= 500.0000 * (15.0000 / 33)0.2000
= 427.0566
Q = Sqr(1 / (1 + 0.63 * ((b + h) / Lz¯)0.63))
= Sqr(1 / (1 + 0.63 * ((8.8615 + 20.6941) / 427.0566)0.63))
= 0.9467
G = 0.925 * (1 + 1.7 * gQ * Iz¯ * Q) / (1 + 1.7 * gv * Iz¯)
= 0.925 * (1 + 1.7 * 3.40* 0.2281 * 0.9467) / (1 + 1.7 * 3.40 * 0.2281)
= 0.8970
Table Lookup Values
α = 9.5000, zg = 274.3200 m [Table 26.9-1, page 256]

c = 0.2000, l = 500.0000, ep = 0.2000 [Table 26.9-1, page 256]
a¯ = 0.1538, b¯ = 0.6500 [Table 26.9-1, page 256]
zmin = 15.0000 ft [Table 26.9-1, page 256]
gQ = 3.40 [26.9.4 page 254]
gv = 3.40 [26.9.4 page 254]
42/109
******************************************************************
WIND OR WAVE MOTION LOAD AND MOMENT
******************************************************************
1. WIND LOAD & MOMENT [NORMAL OPERATING CONDITION]
1) DESIGN DATA
WIND VELOCITY V = 33.5 M/S
OPERATING WEIGHT Wo = 58100 KG
2) WIND FORCE : Fw
Fw = AS PER CAL. SHEET (REFER TO PAGE 30) = 936.4 KG
3) WIND LOAD FACTOR

a) OPERATING CONDITION = Fw/Wo = 0.016 g ===> ⓐ
2. WAVE MOTION LOAD FACTOR (BY SPEC.)
1) WAVE MOTION FACTOR

MAX. VERTICAL ACCELERATION az = 1.281 g
MAX. TRANSVERSAL ACCELERATION ax = 0.347 g
MAX. LONGITUDINAL ACCELERATION ay = 0.1377 g
2) LATERAL ACCELERATION : LA
LA = (ax2 + ay2)0.5 = 0.373 g ===> ⓑ
3. TOTAL LATERAL ACCELERATION

Lt = ⓐ + ⓑ = 0.389
4. MAX. BENDING MOMENT

Mm = AS PER CAL. SHEET (REFER TO PAGE 35) = 99533400 KG-MM
※ NOTE : THE MEANING OF SEISMIC IN CALCULATION SHEET IS WAVE MOTION.

Seismic Code 43/109
Method of seismic analysis: User-defined

Base Shear Multiplier 0.3890
Portion at Top 0.0000
Vertical Accelerations Considered: Yes
Force Multiplier: = 0.0010
Minimum Weight Multiplier: = 0.2810
Vessel height: 20.6941 ft (6.31 m)

Vessel Weight:
Operating, Corroded: 125,990 lb (57,148 kg)
Empty, Corroded: 84,322 lb (38,248 kg)
Vacuum, Corroded: 125,990 lb (57,148 kg)
Period of Vibration Calculation
Fundamental Period, T:
Operating, Corroded: 0.050 sec (f = 20.0 Hz)
Empty, Corroded: 0.041 sec (f = 24.4 Hz)
Vacuum, Corroded: 0.050 sec (f = 20.0 Hz)
The fundamental period of vibration T (above) is calculated using the Rayleigh method of approximation:
T = 2 * PI * Sqr( {Sum(Wi * yi2 )} / {g * Sum(Wi * yi )} ), where
Wi is the weight of the ith lumped mass, and

yi is its deflection when the system is treated as a cantilever beam.
Seismic Shear Reports:
Operating, Corroded
Empty, Corroded
Vacuum, Corroded
Base Shear Calculations
Seismic Shear Report: Operating, Corroded
Elevation of bottom Elastic modulus E Inertia I Seismic shear at Bending Moment at

Component
above base (mm) (kg/cm²) (m4) Bottom (kgf) Bottom (kgf-m)
Top Head 5,575 2,027,197.2 * 4,473.9 1,948.6
Shell 2,175 2,027,197.2 0.5468 20,754.8 51,879
Bottom Head (top) 1,895.5 2,027,197.2 * 21,256.5 57,758
Skirt 0 2,027,197.2 0.09162 22,230.7 99,533.4

Seismic Shear Report: Empty, Corroded 44/109

Component
Top Head 5,575 2,062,603.9 * 4,286.6 1,933.6
Shell 2,175 2,062,603.9 0.5468 13,474.3 37,415.7
Bottom Head (top) 1,895.5 2,062,603.9 * 13,912.8 41,244.4
Skirt 0 2,062,603.9 0.09162 14,878.4 69,084.3

Seismic Shear Report: Vacuum, Corroded

Component
Top Head 5,575 2,027,197.2 * 4,473.9 1,948.6
Shell 2,175 2,027,197.2 0.5468 20,754.8 51,879
Bottom Head (top) 1,895.5 2,027,197.2 * 21,256.5 57,758
Skirt 0 2,027,197.2 0.09162 22,230.7 99,533.4
Vertical Acceleration Term, VAccel
Factor is applied to dead load.

Compressive Side: = 1.0 + VAccel
VAccel Term is:

greater of (Force Mult * Base Shear / Weight) or (Min. Weight Mult.)
Force multiplier = 0.0010 Minimum Weight Multiplier = 0.2810
Force Mult * Shear
Condition Base Shear ( kgf) Weight ( kg) VAccel
Weight
Operating, Corroded 22,230.7 57,148.3 0.0004 0.281
Operating, New 22,600.9 58,100.2 0.0004 0.281
Empty, Corroded 14,878.4 38,247.9 0.0004 0.281
Empty, New 15,248.7 39,199.8 0.0004 0.281
Vacuum, Corroded 22,230.7 57,148.3 0.0004 0.281
Operating, Corroded
Empty, Corroded
Vacuum, Corroded
Base Shear Calculations: Operating, Corroded
V = Base Shear Multiplier * W

= 0.3890 * 125,990.3359
= 49,010.24 lb (22,230.67 kg)
Base Shear Calculations: Empty, Corroded

= 0.3890 * 84,322.1719
= 32,801.33 lb (14,878.43 kg)
Base Shear Calculations: Vacuum, Corroded 45/109

= 0.3890 * 125,990.3359
= 49,010.24 lb (22,230.67 kg)
46/109
******************************************************************
WIND OR WAVE MOTION LOAD AND MOMENT
******************************************************************
1. WIND LOAD & MOMENT [ENVIRONMENTAL LOAD CONDITION]
1) DESIGN DATA
WIND VELOCITY V = 33.5 M/S
2) WIND FORCE : Fw
Fw = AS PER CAL. SHEET (REFER TO PAGE 30) = 936.4 KG
3) WIND LOAD FACTOR

a) OPERATING CONDITION = Fw/Wo = 0.016 g ===> ⓐ
2. WAVE MOTION LOAD FACTOR (BY SPEC.)
1) WAVE MOTION FACTOR

MAX. VERTICAL ACCELERATION az = 1.3162 g
MAX. TRANSVERSAL ACCELERATION ax = 0.461 g
MAX. LONGITUDINAL ACCELERATION ay = 0.1499 g
2) LATERAL ACCELERATION : LA
LA = (ax2 + ay2)0.5 = 0.485 g ===> ⓑ
3. TOTAL LATERAL ACCELERATION

Lt = ⓐ + ⓑ = 0.501
4. MAX. BENDING MOMENT

Mm = AS PER CAL. SHEET (REFER TO PAGE 35) = 127031100 KG-MM
※ NOTE : THE MEANING OF SEISMIC IN CALCULATION SHEET IS WAVE MOTION.

Seismic Code 47/109
Method of seismic analysis: User-defined

Base Shear Multiplier 0.5010
Portion at Top 0.0000
Vertical Accelerations Considered: Yes
Force Multiplier: = 0.0010
Minimum Weight Multiplier: = 0.3162
Vessel height: 20.6941 ft (6.31 m)

Vessel Weight:
Operating, Corroded: 125,990 lb (57,148 kg)
Empty, Corroded: 84,322 lb (38,248 kg)
Vacuum, Corroded: 125,990 lb (57,148 kg)
Period of Vibration Calculation
Fundamental Period, T:
Operating, Corroded: 0.050 sec (f = 20.0 Hz)
Empty, Corroded: 0.041 sec (f = 24.4 Hz)
Vacuum, Corroded: 0.050 sec (f = 20.0 Hz)
The fundamental period of vibration T (above) is calculated using the Rayleigh method of approximation:
T = 2 * PI * Sqr( {Sum(Wi * yi2 )} / {g * Sum(Wi * yi )} ), where
Wi is the weight of the ith lumped mass, and

yi is its deflection when the system is treated as a cantilever beam.
Seismic Shear Reports:
Operating, Corroded
Empty, Corroded
Vacuum, Corroded
Seismic Shear Report: Operating, Corroded

Component
Top Head 5,575 2,027,197.2 * 5,762 2,509.7
Shell 2,175 2,027,197.2 0.5468 26,730.5 65,656
Bottom Head (top) 1,895.5 2,027,197.2 * 27,376.6 73,227.7
Skirt 0 2,027,197.2 0.09162 28,631.3 127,031.1

Seismic Shear Report: Empty, Corroded 48/109

Component
Top Head 5,575 2,062,603.9 * 5,520.9 2,490.4
Shell 2,175 2,062,603.9 0.5468 17,353.8 47,028.5
Bottom Head (top) 1,895.5 2,062,603.9 * 17,918.6 51,959.6
Skirt 0 2,062,603.9 0.09162 19,162.2 87,815

Seismic Shear Report: Vacuum, Corroded

Component
Top Head 5,575 2,027,197.2 * 5,762 2,509.7
Shell 2,175 2,027,197.2 0.5468 26,730.5 65,656
Bottom Head (top) 1,895.5 2,027,197.2 * 27,376.6 73,227.7
Skirt 0 2,027,197.2 0.09162 28,631.3 127,031.1
Vertical Acceleration Term, VAccel
Factor is applied to dead load.

Compressive Side: = 1.0 + VAccel
VAccel Term is:

greater of (Force Mult * Base Shear / Weight) or (Min. Weight Mult.)
Force multiplier = 0.0010 Minimum Weight Multiplier = 0.3162
Force Mult * Shear
Condition Base Shear ( kgf) Weight ( kg) VAccel
Weight
Operating, Corroded 28,631.3 57,148.3 0.0005 0.3162
Operating, New 29,108.2 58,100.2 0.0005 0.3162
Empty, Corroded 19,162.2 38,247.9 0.0005 0.3162
Empty, New 19,639.1 39,199.8 0.0005 0.3162
Vacuum, Corroded 28,631.3 57,148.3 0.0005 0.3162
Operating, Corroded
Empty, Corroded
Vacuum, Corroded
Base Shear Calculations: Operating, Corroded

= 0.5010 * 125,990.3359
= 63,121.16 lb (28,631.28 kg)
Base Shear Calculations: Empty, Corroded

= 0.5010 * 84,322.1719
= 42,245.41 lb (19,162.20 kg)
Base Shear Calculations: Vacuum, Corroded 49/109

= 0.5010 * 125,990.3359
= 63,121.16 lb (28,631.28 kg)
Wind Code%ODVW&RQGLWLRQ 50/109
Building Code: User Defined

147.6378 ft
Elevation of base above grade:
(45.0002 m)
1.9685 ft (0.6000
Increase effective outer diameter by:
m)
Top Deflection Limit: 5 mm per m.
20.6941 ft (6.3076
Vessel height, h:
m)
Vessel Minimum Diameter
8.8615 ft (2.7010
Operating, Corroded:
m)
8.3366 ft (2.5410
Empty, Corroded:
m)
8.3366 ft (2.5410
Hydrotest, Corroded, field:
m)
Fundamental Frequency, n1
Operating, Corroded: 19.9930 Hz
Empty, Corroded: 24.4193 Hz
Hydrotest, Corroded, field: 19.3179 Hz
Damping coefficient, β
Operating, Corroded: 0.0209
Empty, Corroded: 0.0210
Hydrotest, Corroded, field: 0.0260
Wind Deflection Reports:
Operating, Corroded
Empty, Corroded
Vacuum, Corroded
Wind Pressure Table
Wind Deflection Report: Operating, Corroded
Elevation of Platform Total wind bending

Effective OD Elastic modulus Inertia Deflection
Component bottom above wind shear at shear at moment at
(m) E (kg/cm²) I (m4) at top (mm)
base (mm) Bottom (kgf) Bottom (kgf) Bottom (kgf-m)
Top Head 5,575 3.31 2,027,197.2 * 0 8,756.8 2,864.8 1.18
Shell 2,175 3.30 2,027,197.2 0.5468 0 56,824.5 118,381.5 1.01
Bottom Head (top) 1,895.5 3.31 2,027,197.2 * 0 60,728.8 134,814.1 0.27
Skirt 0 3.06 2,027,197.2 0.09162 0 85,562 273,461.2 0.22

Wind Deflection Report: Empty, Corroded 51/109

Top Head 5,575 3.31 2,062,603.9 * 0 8,254.8 2,680.9 1.1
Shell 2,175 3.30 2,062,603.9 0.5468 0 53,992.7 112,530.1 0.95
Bottom Head (top) 1,895.5 3.31 2,062,603.9 * 0 57,705.4 128,144.4 0.26
Skirt 0 3.06 2,062,603.9 0.09162 0 82,538.6 261,060.8 0.2

Wind Deflection Report: Vacuum, Corroded

Top Head 5,575 3.31 2,027,197.2 * 0 8,756.8 2,864.8 1.18
Shell 2,175 3.30 2,027,197.2 0.5468 0 56,824.5 118,381.5 1.01
Bottom Head (top) 1,895.5 3.31 2,027,197.2 * 0 60,728.8 134,814.1 0.27
Skirt 0 3.06 2,027,197.2 0.09162 0 85,562 273,461.2 0.22

Wind Deflection Report: Hydrotest, New, field

(m) E (kg/cm²) I (m4)
Top Head 5,575 3.31 2,070,535.1 * 0 2,724.1 884.7 0.38
Shell 2,175 3.30 2,070,535.1 0.562 0 17,817.6 39,894.7 0.32
Bottom Head (top) 1,895.5 3.31 2,070,535.1 * 0 19,042.8 45,047.5 0.09
Skirt 0 3.06 2,070,535.1 0.09162 0 27,237.7 88,909.9 0.07

-->
Wind Deflection Report: Hydrotest, Corroded, field

(m) E (kg/cm²) I (m4)
Top Head 5,575 3.31 2,070,535.1 * 0 2,724.1 884.7 0.38
Shell 2,175 3.30 2,070,535.1 0.5468 0 17,817.6 39,833.9 0.32
Bottom Head (top) 1,895.5 3.31 2,070,535.1 * 0 19,042.8 44,986.7 0.09
Skirt 0 3.06 2,070,535.1 0.09162 0 27,237.7 88,849.1 0.07
Wind Pressure (WP) table

Design Wind Pressures 52/109
Adjusted
To Height Z Wind Pressure
by Cf
(m) (bar)
(bar)
10.00 0.6000 0.4200
20.00 0.6000 0.4200
30.00 0.6000 0.4200
40.00 0.6000 0.4200
50.00 0.6000 0.4200
60.00 0.6000 0.4200
Design Wind Force determined from: F = Pressure * Af , where Af is the projected area.
To Height Z Wind Pressure Adjusted by Cf

(m) (bar) (bar) %PRESSURESTABLEVOC%
-->
Adjusted by Cf
To Height Z Wind Pressure
(bar)
(m) (bar)
%PRESSURESTABLEVEC%
-->
To Height Z Wind Pressure Adjusted by Cf
(m) (bar) (bar) %PRESSURESTABLEVVC%
-->
Skirt1RUPDO2SHUDWLQJ&RQGLWLRQ 53/109
Material: SA-516 60 (II-D Metric p. 14, ln. 6)

Design temperature, operating: 85 °C
Design temperature, vacuum: 85 °C
Inner diameter at top, new: 2,427 mm
Inner diameter at bottom, new: 2,427 mm
Overall length (includes base ring thickness): 1,895.5 mm
Corrosion allowance inside: 0 mm
Corrosion allowance outside: 0 mm
Weld joint efficiency top: 0.55
Weld joint efficiency bottom: 0.55
Nominal thickness, new: 16 mm
Skirt is attached to: Bottom Head
Skirt attachment offset: 279.5 mm down from the top seam
Skirt design thickness, largest of the following + corrosion = 2.62 mm
The governing condition is due to earthquake, compressive stress at the base, operating & new.
The skirt thickness of 16 mm is adequate.

Vessel Governing
Temperature
Allowable Calculated Required 54/109
Loading Condition Skirt Stress Stress/E thickness
(°C)
(Stress) Location (kgf/cm2) (kgf/cm2) (mm)
Wind operating, corroded (+) top 85 1,189.4 -19.55 0.26
Wind operating, corroded (-) bottom 85 1,189.4 55.47 0.75
Wind operating, new (+) top 85 1,189.4 -19.93 0.27
Wind operating, new (-) bottom 85 1,189.4 56.33 0.76
Wind empty, corroded (+) top 10 1,189.4 -10.41 0.14
Wind empty, corroded (-) bottom 10 1,189.4 39.9 0.54
Wind empty, new (+) top 10 1,189.4 -10.79 0.15
Wind empty, new (-) bottom 10 1,189.4 40.75 0.55
Wind test, corroded (+) top 10 1,189.4 -22.31 0.3
Wind test, corroded (-) bottom 10 1,189.4 59.72 0.8
Wind vacuum, corroded (+) top 85 1,189.4 -19.55 0.26
Wind vacuum, corroded (-) bottom 85 1,189.4 55.47 0.75
Seismic operating, corroded (+) bottom 85 1,443.92 157.35 1.74
Seismic operating, corroded (-) bottom 85 1,189.4 191.85 2.58
Seismic operating, new (+) bottom 85 1,443.92 160.05 1.77
Seismic operating, new (-) bottom 85 1,189.4 195.1 2.62
Seismic empty, corroded (+) bottom 10 1,443.92 111.52 1.24
Seismic empty, corroded (-) bottom 10 1,189.4 131.54 1.77
Seismic empty, new (+) bottom 10 1,443.92 114.21 1.27
Seismic empty, new (-) bottom 10 1,189.4 134.78 1.81
Seismic vacuum, corroded (+) bottom 85 1,443.92 157.35 1.74
Seismic vacuum, corroded (-) bottom 85 1,189.4 191.85 2.58
Loading due to earthquake, operating & new

Tensile side
Required thickness, tensile stress at base:
t = -W / (π*D*St*E) + 4*M / (π*D2*St*E)

= -57,644.75 / (π*2,443*1,443.917/100*0.55) + 4*1e3*101,224.9 / (π*2,4432*1,443.917/100*0.55)
= 1.77 mm
Required thickness, tensile stress at the top:
t = -Wt / (π*Dt*St*E) + 4*Mt / (π*Dt2*St*E)

= -55,858.05 / (π*2,443*1,443.917/100*0.55) + 4*1e3*58,549.2 / (π*2,4432*1,443.917/100*0.55)
= 0.66 mm
Compressive side
Required thickness, compressive stress at base:
t = (1 + VAccel)*W / (π*D*Sc*Ec) + 4*M / (π*D2*Sc*Ec)

= (1 + 0.281)*57,644.75 / (π*2,443*1,189.4/100*1) + 4*1e3*101,224.9 / (π*2,4432*1,189.4/100*1)
= 2.62 mm
Required thickness, compressive stress at the top:
t = (1 + VAccel)*Wt / (π*Dt*Sc*Ec) + 4*Mt / (π*Dt2*Sc*Ec)

= (1 + 0.281)*55,858.05 / (π*2,443*1,189.4/100*1) + 4*1e3*58,549.2 / (π*2,4432*1,189.4/100*1)
= 1.83 mm
55/109
*****************************************************************
CALCULATION OF BASE PLATE AND WELDMENT
*****************************************************************
[NORMAL OPERATING CONDITION]

☞ DESIGN DATA
MATERIAL OF BASE PLATE = SA516 Gr.60
YIELD STRESS OF BASE PLATE Sy = 22.433 KG/MM2
ALLOWABLE STRESS OF BASE PLATE (1.2 x S) S = 14.438 KG/MM2
2
OUTWARD FILLET WELD SHEAR STRESS Sw = 8.973 KG/MM
(Sw = Sy x 0.4)
NOMINAL TH'K OF BASE PLATE tb = 38 MM
FILLET WELD LEG OF BASE PLATE L1 = 14 MM
OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF BASE PLATE D1 = 2655 MM
INSIDE DIAMETER OF BASE PLATE D2 = 2255 MM
OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF SKIRT Do = 2459 MM
INSIDE DIAMETER OF SKIRT Di = 2427 MM

MAXIMUM BENDING MOMENT Mm = 99533400 KG-MM
MAXIMUM ECCENTRIC MOMENT Me = 0 KG-MM
1 . CALCULATION OF BASE PLATE
2 2
A = π/4 x (D1 - D2 ) = 1542522.0 MM2
4 4
Z = π/32 x (D1 - D2 )/D1 = 881216524.9 MM3
2
B = (Mm + Me)/Z + (az x Wo)/A = 0.161 KG/MM
L1 = (D1 - Do)/2 = 98 MM
L2 = (Di - D2)/2 = 86 MM
L = LARGER VALUE OF L1 OR L2 = 98 MM
REQUIRED BASE PLATE TH'K : tr
2
tr = SQRT[3 x L x B / S]
= 22.077 MM ≤ tb = 38 MM O.K !!
2 . SIZE OF WELDMENT
Mm + Me 99533400.0
Ws = = = 17.978 KG/MM
Zw 5536291.3
WHERE , Zw = πd2/4 = 5536291.3 MM2
Ws 17.98
= = 2.004 ≤ 14 MM O.K !!
Sw 8.973
Skirt(QYLURQPHQWDO/RDG&RQGLWLRQ 56/109

The governing condition is due to earthquake, compressive stress at the base, operating & new.

Vessel Governing
Temperature
Allowable Calculated Required 57/109
(°C)
Wind operating, corroded (+) top 85 1,189.4 -19.55 0.26
Wind operating, new (+) top 85 1,189.4 -19.93 0.27
Wind empty, corroded (+) top 10 1,189.4 -10.41 0.14
Wind empty, new (+) top 10 1,189.4 -10.79 0.15
Wind test, corroded (+) top 10 1,189.4 -22.31 0.3
Wind vacuum, corroded (+) top 85 1,189.4 -19.55 0.26
Seismic operating, corroded (+) bottom 85 1,443.92 224.02 2.48
Seismic operating, corroded (-) bottom 85 1,189.4 230.14 3.1
Seismic operating, new (+) bottom 85 1,443.92 227.85 2.52
Seismic operating, new (-) bottom 85 1,189.4 234.04 3.15
Seismic empty, corroded (+) bottom 10 1,443.92 156.93 1.74
Seismic empty, corroded (-) bottom 10 1,189.4 157.6 2.12
Seismic empty, new (+) bottom 10 1,443.92 160.76 1.78
Seismic empty, new (-) bottom 10 1,189.4 161.5 2.17
Seismic vacuum, corroded (+) bottom 85 1,443.92 224.02 2.48
Seismic vacuum, corroded (-) bottom 85 1,189.4 230.14 3.1
Loading due to earthquake, operating & new

Tensile side
t = -W / (π*D*St*E) + 4*M / (π*D2*St*E)

= -57,644.75 / (π*2,443*1,443.917/100*0.55) + 4*1e3*129,192 / (π*2,4432*1,443.917/100*0.55)
= 2.52 mm

= -55,858.05 / (π*2,443*1,443.917/100*0.55) + 4*1e3*74,229.3 / (π*2,4432*1,443.917/100*0.55)
= 1.08 mm
Compressive side
Required thickness, compressive stress at base:
t = (1 + VAccel)*W / (π*D*Sc*Ec) + 4*M / (π*D2*Sc*Ec)

= (1 + 0.3162)*57,644.75 / (π*2,443*1,189.4/100*1) + 4*1e3*129,192 / (π*2,4432*1,189.4/100*1)
= 3.15 mm
t = (1 + VAccel)*Wt / (π*Dt*Sc*Ec) + 4*Mt / (π*Dt2*Sc*Ec)

= (1 + 0.3162)*55,858.05 / (π*2,443*1,189.4/100*1) + 4*1e3*74,229.3 / (π*2,4432*1,189.4/100*1)
= 2.14 mm
58/109
*****************************************************************
*****************************************************************
[ENVIRONMENTAL LOAD CONDITION]

☞ DESIGN DATA
2
(Sw = Sy x 0.4)

MAXIMUM BENDING MOMENT Mm = 127031100 KG-MM
2 2
A = π/4 x (D1 - D2 ) = 1542522.0 MM2
4 4
Z = π/32 x (D1 - D2 )/D1 = 881216524.9 MM3
2
B = (Mm + Me)/Z + (az x Wo)/A = 0.194 KG/MM
L1 = (D1 - Do)/2 = 98 MM
L2 = (Di - D2)/2 = 86 MM
2
= 24.202 MM ≤ tb = 38 MM O.K !!
Mm + Me 127031100.0
Ws = = = 22.945 KG/MM
Zw 5536291.3
WHERE , Zw = πd2/4 = 5536291.3 MM2
Ws 22.95
= = 2.557 ≤ 14 MM O.K !!
Sw 8.973
Skirt%ODVW&RQGLWLRQ 59/109

The governing condition is due to wind, tensile stress at the base, operating & corroded.
Vessel Governing Allowable Calculated Required

Temperature
(°C)
Wind operating, corroded (+) bottom 85 1,443.92 579 6.42
Wind operating, new (+) bottom 85 1,443.92 577.74 6.4
Wind empty, corroded (+) bottom 10 1,443.92 576.92 6.39
Wind empty, new (+) bottom 10 1,443.92 575.66 6.38
Wind test, corroded (+) bottom 10 1,443.92 123.39 1.37
Wind vacuum, corroded (+) bottom 85 1,443.92 579 6.42
Loading due to wind, operating & corroded

Windward side (tensile)
t = -W / (π*D*St*E) + 4*M / (π*D2*St*E)

= -56,693.85 / (π*2,443*1,443.917/100*0.55) + 4*1e3*273,461.1 / (π*2,4432*1,443.917/100*0.55)
= 6.42 mm

= -54,907.16 / (π*2,443*1,443.917/100*0.55) + 4*1e3*134,814 / (π*2,4432*1,443.917/100*0.55)
= 2.72 mm
Leeward side (compressive)
Required thickness, compressive stress at base: 60/109
t = W / (π*D*Sc*Ec) + 4*M / (π*D2*Sc*Ec)

= 56,693.85 / (π*2,443*1,189.4/100*1) + 4*1e3*273,461.1 / (π*2,4432*1,189.4/100*1)
= 5.53 mm
t = Wt / (π*Dt*Sc*Ec) + 4*Mt / (π*Dt2*Sc*Ec)

= 54,907.16 / (π*2,443*1,189.4/100*1) + 4*1e3*134,814 / (π*2,4432*1,189.4/100*1)
= 3.02 mm
61/109
*****************************************************************
*****************************************************************
[BLAST CONDITION]
☞ DESIGN DATA
2
(Sw = Sy x 0.4)

MAXIMUM BENDING MOMENT (REFER TO PAGE 41) Mm = 273461200.0 KG-MM
2 2
A = π/4 x (D1 - D2 ) = 1542522.0 MM2
4 4
Z = π/32 x (D1 - D2 )/D1 = 881216524.9 MM3
2
B = (Mm + Me)/Z + Wo/A = 0.348 KG/MM
L1 = (D1 - Do)/2 = 98 MM
L2 = (Di - D2)/2 = 86 MM
2
= 32.437 MM ≤ tb = 38 MM O.K !!
Mm + Me 273461200.0
Ws = = = 49.394 KG/MM
Zw 5536291.3
WHERE , Zw = πd2/4 = 5536291.3 MM2
Ws 49.39
= = 5.505 ≤ 14 MM O.K !!
Sw 8.973
62/109
CALCULATION OF BASEBLOCK UNDER LIFTING CONDITION
1. CALCULATION OF LIFTING FORCES
a) ERECTION WEIGHT We = 39200 kg

b) DYNAMIC LOAD FACTOR F= 1.5 --
c) LIFTING WEIGHT W = We x F = 58800 kg
d) DIMENSIONS ; X= 2369.0 mm
Y= 3548.0 mm
R= 1429.5 mm
* LL = W x ( Y x cosα + R x sinα ) / ( ( X + Y ) x cosα + R x sinα )

* TL = W x ( X x cosα ) / ( ( X + Y ) x cosα + R x sinα )
* LV = LL x cosα , LH = LL x sinα
* TV = TL x cosα , TH = TL x sinα
2. SUMMARY OF LIFTING FORCES IN VARIOUS ANGLES OF LIFTING
Max. Loads ; LL = 58800.0 kg ( at α = 90.00 Deg.)

LV = 35681.0 kg ( at α = 9.00 Deg.)
LH = 58800.0 kg ( at α = 90.00 Deg.)
TL = 23541.9 kg ( at α = 0.00 Deg.)
TV = 23541.9 kg ( at α = 0.00 Deg.)
TH = 14398.0 kg ( at α = 58.00 Deg.)
α LL TL LV LH TV TH
0.0 35258.1 23541.9 35258.1 0.0 23541.9 0.0
5.0 35745.4 23054.6 35609.4 3115.4 22966.8 2009.3
9.0 36125.8 22674.2 35681.0 5651.3 22395.1 3547.0
30.0 38139.9 20660.1 33030.1 19069.9 17892.2 10330.1
45.0 39839.0 18961.0 28170.4 28170.4 13407.5 13407.5
58.0 41822.2 16977.8 22162.4 35467.3 8996.9 14398.0
70.0 44650.3 14149.7 15271.3 41957.5 4839.5 13296.4
85.0 52541.2 6258.8 4579.3 52341.3 545.5 6235.0
90.0 58800.0 0.0 0.0 58800.0 0.0 0.0
63/109
3. STRENGTH OF LIFTING LUG
MATERIAL AT LUG : SA 516-60

ALLOWABLE STRESS IN TENSION Sa = 12.02 ㎏/㎟
YIELD STRESS Sy = 22.5 ㎏/㎟
Q'TY OF LIFTING LUG N = 2 ea
VERTICAL FORCE PER 1 LUG LV'= LV / N = 17840.49 ㎏
HORIZONTAL FORCE PER 1 LUG LH'= LH / N = 29400 ㎏
LIFTING HALF ANGLE β = 15 deg.
AXIAL FORCE PER 1 LUG Pa = LH' * tan β = 7877.71 ㎏
* DIMENSIONS
T= 44 ㎜ A= 850 ㎜
t= 19 ㎜ B= 130 ㎜
R= 160 ㎜ C= 350 ㎜
d= 110 ㎜ D= 370 ㎜
a= 320 ㎜ W= 29 ㎜
b= 190 ㎜ e= 660 ㎜
Dp = 0 ㎜ t2 = 0 ㎜
3-1. CHECK OF LUG

a) SHEAR STRESS DUE TO LH'
S1 = 2*LH'/{(2*R-d)*T + 1/2 * (Dp-d) * t2 * 2}
= 6.364 ㎏/㎟ < 0.4*Sy= 9 ㎏/㎟ ; O.K. !
b) TENSION DUE TO LH'

S2 = LH'/{(2*R-d)*T + (Dp-d) * t2 * 2}
= 3.182 ㎏/㎟ < 0.6*Sy= 13.5 ㎏/㎟ ; O.K. !
c) SHEAR STRESS DUE TO LV'

S3 = 2*LV'/{(2*R-d)*T + 1/2 * (Dp-d) * t2 * 2}
= 3.862 ㎏/㎟ < 0.4*Sy= 9 ㎏/㎟ ; O.K. !
d) TENSION DUE TO LV'

S4 = LV'/{(2*R-d)*T + (Dp-d) * t2 * 2}
= 1.931 ㎏/㎟ < 0.6*Sy= 13.5 ㎏/㎟ ; O.K. !
e) BENDING STRESS DUE TO LV'

S5 = 6 * LV' * B / [(2 * R)²* T * √2]
= 2.184 ㎏/㎟ < 0.66*Sy= 14.85 ㎏/㎟ ; O.K. !
64/109
3-2. STRESS OF GUIDE POINT

a) BENDING STRESS DUE TO Pa
S6 = 6*Pa*B/(2*R*T²) = 6 * 7877.71 * 130 / (2 * 160 * 44²)
= 9.918 ㎏/㎟ < 0.66*Sy= 14.85 ㎏/㎟ ; O.K. !
b) TENSION DUE TO LH'

S7 = LH'/ (2*R*T) = 29400.00 / {(2 * 160 * 44)
= 2.088 ㎏/㎟ < 0.6*Sy= 13.5 ㎏/㎟ ; O.K. !
c) COMBINED STRESS
S8 = (S6/0.66Sy) + (S7/0.6Sy) < 1
= 0.823 < 1 O.K. !
d) AXIAL STRESS DUE TO Pa

S9 = Pa / (2 * R * t)
= 1.296 ㎏/㎟ < 0.6*Sy= 13.5 ㎏/㎟ ; O.K. !
65/109
3-3. LIFTING LUG WELD CALCULATION - LUG TO PAD WELD
b = 190.00 mm
d1 = 105.00 mm
d2 = 110.00 mm
d' = 320.00 mm
e = 660.00 mm
LV' = 17840.5 kg
LH' = 29400 kg
(A) HORIZONTAL POSITION WITH LOAD LV'
1) Lug Weld Check Per Unit Width of Weld Throat
* Centroid , n = 2b2 / (4 * b + 2d1) = 74.433 mm

m=b-n = 115.567 mm
* Twisting Moment , T =(b+e-n)*LV'= 13836498 kg-mm
* The polar moment of inertia of weld , Jw

Jw = 4*[b3/12+b*(b/2-n)] + 2*d1*n2 + 2*b*(d1+d2/2)2 + 2*b*(d2/2)2 + 2*[d13/12+d1*(d1/2+d2/2)2]
= 16962671 mm3
* Distance from c.g to point being analyzed, C = √ [m2 + (0.5d')2] = 197.37 mm
Analyzed point is A
* Weld length, L = 4 * b + 2 * d1 = 970.00 mm
a) Direct shear force, fs = LV' / L = 18.392 kg/mm
b) Max. Load from twisting, f = T * C / Jw = 160.997 kg/mm
Vertical component , fv = m * f / C = 94.268 kg/mm

Horizontal component , fh=0.5d'* f/C = 130.512 kg/mm
c) Combined load per mm , F = √ [fh2 + (fs + fv)2] = 172.412 kg/mm
d) Weld size check
Allowable stress S = 0.4 * Sy = 9.000 kg/㎟
leg size, W = F / 0.707S = 27.096 mm < Min. Size = 29 mm O.K !
(B) VERTICAL POSITION WITH LOAD LH'
Weld area , A = L * (0.707 * W) = 19887.91 ㎟
fs' = LH' / A = 1.478 kg/㎟ < 0.4 * Sy = 9.000 kg/㎟ O.K !

66/109
3-4. LIFTING LUG WELD CALCULATION - PAD TO SHELL WELD
MATERIAL AT PAD = SA 516-60

YIELD STRESS = 22.50 ㎏/㎟
b = 290.00 mm
d = 420.00 mm
e = 610.00 mm
LV' = 17840.5 kg
LH' = 29400.0 kg
(A) HORIZONTAL POSITION WITH LOAD LV'
1) Lug Weld Check Per Unit Width of Weld Throat
* Centroid , n = m = b / 2 = 145.000 mm
* Twisting Moment , T =(b+e-n)*LV'= 13469572 kg-mm
* The polar moment of inertia of weld , Jw

Jw = (b + d)3 / 6 = 59651833 mm3
* Distance from c.g to point being analyzed, C = √ [m2+(0.5d')2]= 255.20 mm
Analyzed point is A or B
* Weld length, L = 2 * b + 2 * d = 1420.00 mm
a) Direct shear force, fs = LV' / L = 12.564 kg/mm
b) Max. Load from twisting, f = T * C / Jw = 57.624 kg/mm
Vertical component , fv = m * f / C = 32.741 kg/mm

Horizontal component , fh = 0.5d'*f/C= 47.419 kg/mm
c) Combined load per mm , F = √ [fh2 + (fs + fv)2] = 65.583 kg/mm
d) Weld size check
Allowable stress S = 0.4 * Sy = 9.000 kg/㎟
leg size, W = F / 0.707S = 10.307 mm < Min. Size = 14 mm O.K !
(B) VERTICAL POSITION WITH LOAD LH'
Weld area , A = L * (0.707 * W) = 14055.16 ㎟
fs' = LH' / A = 2.092 kg/㎟ < 0.4 * Sy = 9.000 kg/㎟ O.K !

67/109
4. STRENGTH OF TAILING LUG
USED MATERIAL = SA 516-60

YIELD STRESS OF TAILING LUG Sy = 22.50 ㎏/㎟
ALLOWABLE SHEAR STRESS (0.4 * Sy) Ssa = 9.000 ㎏/㎟
ALLOWABLE BENDING STRESS (0.66 * Sy) Sba = 14.850 ㎏/㎟
ALLOWABLE TENSILE STRESS (0.6 * Sy) Sta = 13.500 ㎏/㎟
TAILING LUG Q'TY. N= 1 EA
LIFTING LOAD (MAX. AT HORIZONTAL COND.) TV = 23541.86 kg
LIFTING LOAD PER TAILING LUG (VERTICAL FORCE) TV' = TV/N = 23541.86 kg
LIFTING LOAD (MAX. AT VERTICAL COND.) AT 58.00 deg. TH = 14397.97 kg
LIFTING LOAD PER TAILING LUG (HORIZONTAL FORCE) TH' = TH/N = 14397.97 kg
* DIMENSIONS
t= 44.0 mm t2 = 38.00 mm
L= 200.0 mm t3 = 0.00 mm
R= 150.0 mm L1 = 300.00 mm
d= 90.0 mm L2 = 200.00 mm
W= 14.0 mm (WELD LEG) L3 = 0.00 mm
Dp = 0.0 mm TOTAL WELD LENGTH L4 = 398.00 mm
t4 = 0.0 mm
** STRENGTH CALCULATION **
4-1) SHEAR STRESS AT HORIZONTAL STATE
S1 = 2TV' / [(2R - d) * t + 1/2 * (Dp - d) * 2t4] = 5.096 ㎏/㎟
∴ S1 = 5.096 ㎏/㎟ < Ssa = 9.00 ㎏/㎟

O.K. !
4-2) TENSION STRESS AT HORIZONTAL STATE

S2 = TV' / [(2R - d) * t + (Dp - d) * 2t4] = 2.548 ㎏/㎟
∴ S2 = 2.548 ㎏/㎟ < Sta = 13.500 ㎏/㎟

O.K. !
4-3) BENDING STRESS AT MAX. SLOPED LOAD STATE , AT 58.00 deg.

S3 = 6 * TH' * L / [(2 * R)²*t * √2] = 3.085 ㎏/㎟
∴ S3 = 3.085 ㎏/㎟ < Sba = 14.850 ㎏/㎟

O.K. !
68/109
4-4) TENSION STRESS AT MAX. SLOPED LOAD STATE , AT 58.00 deg.

S4 = TH' / [(2 * R - d) * t * √2] = 1.102 ㎏/㎟
∴ S4 = 1.102 ㎏/㎟ < Sta = 13.500 ㎏/㎟

O.K. !
4-5) COMBINE STRESS AT MAX. SLOPED STATE, AT 58.00 deg.
Scomb = S3 / Sba + S4 / Sta = 0.289 < 1.0
O.K. !
4-6) CHECK OF WELDMENT
Sw = (TV' * √2) / (2 * L4 * W) = 2.988 ㎏/㎟
∴ Sw = 2.988 ㎏/㎟ < 0.49 * Sba = 6.615 ㎏/㎟

O.K. !
69/109
5. BASE BLOCK UNDER ERECTION CONDITION
5-1. SECTIONAL PROPERTIES OF BASE BLOCK
t1 = 16.00 mm
t2 = 38.00 mm
t3 = 0.00 mm
t4 = 0.00 mm
L2a = 98.00 mm
L2b = 102.00 mm
L3 = 0.00 mm
L4 = 0.00 mm
L= 300.00 mm
Di = 2427.00 mm
5-2. EFFECTIVE LENGTH OF SKIRT
Rm = (Di + t1) / 2 = 1221.50 mm

L1 = Min.( 0.78 * √(Rm * t1), 16*t1) = 109.04 mm
5-3. SECTION AREA , A
A1 = t1 * (L + L1 + t3) = 6544.7 ㎟
A2 = t2 * (L2a + L2b) = 7600.0 ㎟
A3 = t3 * L3 = 0.0 ㎟
A4 = t4 * L4 = 0.0 ㎟
TOTAL AREA, A = 14144.7 ㎟
5-4. CENTROID, C
h1 = L2a + t1 / 2 = 106.0 mm
h2 = (L2a + L2b) / 2 = 100.0 mm
h3 = L3 / 2 - (L3 - L2a) = 98.0 mm
h4 = L2a + t1 + L4 / 2 = 114.0 mm
C = [(A1 * h1) + (A2 * h2) + (A3 * h3) + (A4 * h4)] / A = 102.78 mm

Y = (L2a + L2b) - C = 97.22 mm
5-5. MOMENT OF INERTIA OF AREA, I (ABOUT NEUTRAL AXIS)
I1 = (L + L1 + t3) * t1^3 / 12 + A1 * (h1 - C)^2 = 207640 mm^4

I2 = t2 * (L2a + L2b)^3 / 12 + A2 * (h2 - C)^2 = 25391908 mm^4
I3 = t3 * L3^3 / 12 + A3 * (h3 - C)^2 = 0 mm^4
I4 = t4 * L4^3 / 12 + A4 * (h4 - C)^2 = 0 mm^4
TOTAL I = I1 + I2 + I3 + I4 = 25599547 mm^4
5-6. MIN. SECTION MODULUS, Z
Z1 = I / C = 249081 mm^3
Z2 = I / Y = 263305 mm^3
Z = Min.(Z1, Z2) = 249081 mm^3
70/109
5-7. STRESS IN BASE BLOCK DUE TO TV
TV = 23541.9 kg (Max. Force at Tailing Lug)

R = 1224.72 mm (Radius to neutral axis)
Sy = 22.5 kg/㎟ (Yield Strength of Base)
Z = 249081 kg/mm^3 (Section Modulus of Base)
A = 14144.7 ㎟ (Section Area of Base)
a) BENDING MOMENT (Ma) & TANGENTIAL FORCE (Ta) AT BASE BLOCK
CASE ; NO BRACING : ROARK 4th ED. CASE 25
Ma = 0.2387 * TV * R = 6882265 kg-mm

Ta = 0.2387 * TV = 5619.4 kg
σ = Ma / Z + Ta / A = 28.028 kg/㎟ > 0.66Sy = 14.850 kg/㎟
THEREFORE, BRACING IS REQUIRED !!

71/109
5-8. ONE BRACING ; ROARK 4th ED. CASE 25
Ma = 0.07958*TV*R = 2294473 kg-mm

Ta = 0.2387 * TV = 5619.4 kg
σ = Ma / Z + Ta / A = 9.609 kg/㎟ < 0.66Sy = 14.850 ; O.K !
5-9. STRESS CHECK AT BRACING
a) Max. Loads at Tailing Lug
TV Max. Angle α = 0.00 Deg. TH Max.Angle α = 58.00 Deg.

TL = 23541.9 kg TL = 16977.8 kg
TV = TL * cosα = 23541.9 kg TV = TL * cosα = 8996.9 kg
TH = TL * sinα = 0.0 kg TH = TL * sinα = 14398.0 kg
CASE ; ONE BRACING
Bracing Size Size = H-200 x 200 x 8 x 12

Bracing Material Mat'l = A36
Yield Strength of Bracing Sy = 25.311 kg/㎟
Beam Cross Sectional Area Ab = 6353.0 ㎟
Beam Elastic Modulus Zb = 472000.0 mm^3
Area of Compression Flange Af = 2400.0 ㎟
Beam Depth d = 200.0 mm
Beam Length L = 2427.00 mm
Distance, H H = 200 mm
b) Max. Allowable Stress of Tension Flange
Sbt = 0.6 * Sy = 15.187 kg/㎟
c) Max. Allowable Stress of Compression Flange (AISC Eq. 1.5-7)
Sbc =Min.(12000*1.75*1000/(L*d/Af), Sbt) = 15.187 kg/㎟
d) Bending Moment (Mb), Bending Stress (Sb), Tensile Stres (St)
Mb = TH*H, Sb = Mb/Zb, St = TV/Ab
Mb Sb St
at α = 0.00 Deg. 0.000 kg-mm 0.000 kg/㎟ 3.706 kg/㎟
at α = 58.00 Deg. 2879594 kg-mm 6.101 kg/㎟ 1.416 kg/㎟
e) AISC CriteriasBending Moment (Mb), Bending Stress (Sb), Tensile Stres (St)
Sb - St < Sbc, Sb + St < Sbt
Sb-St Sbc Sb+St Sbt

at α = 0.00 Deg. -3.706 15.187 ; O.K ! 3.706 15.187 ; O.K !
at α = 58.00 Deg. 4.685 15.187 ; O.K ! 7.517 15.187 ; O.K !
Lifting Lug 72/109
Geometry
38
Height(radial): 82 mm Pad Thickness:
mm
420
Width (circumferential): 320 mm Pad Width:
mm
290
Length 190 mm Pad Length:
mm
14
Fillet Weld Size: 29 mm Pad Weld Size:
mm
Located on: Shell (320 mm from top end)
Location Angle: 135.00°
Applied Loads
Radial load: Pr = 0 kgf

Circumferential moment: Mc = 1,470 kgf-m
Circumferential shear: Vc = 17,850.02 kgf
Longitudinal moment: ML = 2,420 kgf-m
Longitudinal shear: VL = 29,400.03 kgf
Torsion moment: Mt = 0 kgf-m
Internal pressure: P= 0 bar
Mean shell radius: Rm = 1,221.5 mm
Shell yield stress: Sy = 2,253.57 kgf/cm2
Design factor: 3
Maximum stresses due to the applied loads at the lug edge (includes pressure)
γ = Rm / T = 1,221.5 / 136 = 8.9816
C1 = 189, C2 = 124 mm
Local circumferential pressure stress = P*Ri / T =0 kgf/cm2
Local longitudinal pressure stress = P*Ri / (2*T) =0 kgf/cm2
Maximum combined stress (PL+Pb+Q) = 87.6 kgf/cm2

Allowable combined stress (PL+Pb+Q) = +-3*S = +-3,609.79 kgf/cm2
The maximum combined stress (PL+Pb+Q) is within allowable limits.
Maximum local primary membrane stress (PL) = -5.41 kgf/cm2

Allowable local primary membrane stress (PL) = +-1.5*S = +-1,804.9 kgf/cm2
The maximum local primary membrane stress (PL) is within allowable limits.
Stresses at the lug edge per WRC Bulletin 107 73/109
Figure value β Au Al Bu Bl Cu Cl Du Dl
3C* 1.6329 0.1234 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4C* 1.6837 0.1402 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1C 0.1614 0.142 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2C-1 0.1247 0.142 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3A* 0.1792 0.1345 0 0 0 0 -1.406 -1.406 1.406 1.406
1A 0.1012 0.1581 0 0 0 0 -24.959 24.959 24.959 -24.959
3B* 0.5886 0.1168 -5.414 -5.414 5.414 5.414 0 0 0 0
1B-1 0.0581 0.1236 -30.232 30.232 30.232 -30.232 0 0 0 0
Pressure stress* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total circumferential stress -35.646 24.818 35.646 -24.818 -26.365 23.553 26.365 -23.553
Primary membrane
-5.414 -5.414 5.414 5.414 -1.406 -1.406 1.406 1.406
circumferential stress*
3C* 1.5724 0.1402 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4C* 1.7093 0.1234 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1C-1 0.173 0.1297 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2C 0.1344 0.1297 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4A* 0.2539 0.1345 0 0 0 0 -1.617 -1.617 1.617 1.617
2A 0.0612 0.1432 0 0 0 0 -16.663 16.663 16.663 -16.663
4B* 0.155 0.1168 -1.336 -1.336 1.336 1.336 0 0 0 0
2B-1 0.094 0.123 -49.145 49.145 49.145 -49.145 0 0 0 0
Total longitudinal stress -50.48 47.809 50.48 -47.809 -18.28 15.046 18.28 -15.046
Primary membrane
-1.336 -1.336 1.336 1.336 -1.617 -1.617 1.617 1.617
longitudinal stress*
Shear from Mt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Circ shear from Vc 17.366 17.366 -17.366 -17.366 0 0 0 0
Long shear from VL 0 0 0 0 -43.59 -43.59 43.59 43.59
Total Shear stress 17.366 17.366 -17.366 -17.366 -43.59 -43.59 43.59 43.59
Combined stress (PL+Pb+Q) -61.94 57.16 61.94 -57.16 87.532 87.602 87.532 87.602
Note: * denotes primary stress.
Maximum stresses due to the applied loads at the pad edge (includes pressure)
γ = Rm / T = 1,221.5 / 98 = 12.4643
C1 = 224, C2 = 159 mm
Local circumferential pressure stress = P*Ri / T =0 kgf/cm2
Local longitudinal pressure stress = P*Ri / (2*T) =0 kgf/cm2
Maximum combined stress (PL+Pb+Q) = 95.48 kgf/cm2

Allowable combined stress (PL+Pb+Q) = +-3*S = +-3,609.79 kgf/cm2
The maximum combined stress (PL+Pb+Q) is within allowable limits.
Maximum local primary membrane stress (PL) = -11.74 kgf/cm2

Allowable local primary membrane stress (PL) = +-1.5*S = +-1,804.9 kgf/cm2
The maximum local primary membrane stress (PL) is within allowable limits.
Stresses at the pad edge per WRC Bulletin 107 74/109
Figure value β Au Al Bu Bl Cu Cl Du Dl
3C* 2.0297 0.1526 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4C* 2.2057 0.1688 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1C 0.1249 0.1705 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2C-1 0.0902 0.1705 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3A* 0.3611 0.1636 0 0 0 0 -3.094 -3.094 3.094 3.094
1A 0.0951 0.1915 0 0 0 0 -37.333 37.333 37.333 -37.333
3B* 1.1553 0.1459 -11.741 -11.741 11.741 11.741 0 0 0 0
1B-1 0.0506 0.1533 -40.848 40.848 40.848 -40.848 0 0 0 0
Total circumferential stress -52.59 29.107 52.59 -29.107 -40.426 34.239 40.426 -34.239
Primary membrane
-11.741 -11.741 11.741 11.741 -3.094 -3.094 3.094 3.094
circumferential stress*
3C* 1.9514 0.1688 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4C* 2.2558 0.1526 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1C-1 0.133 0.1587 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2C 0.0961 0.1587 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4A* 0.5321 0.1636 0 0 0 0 -3.797 -3.797 3.797 3.797
2A 0.0557 0.178 0 0 0 0 -23.553 23.553 23.553 -23.553
4B* 0.3192 0.1459 -3.094 -3.094 3.094 3.094 0 0 0 0
2B-1 0.0816 0.1542 -65.526 65.526 65.526 -65.526 0 0 0 0
Total longitudinal stress -68.62 62.433 68.62 -62.433 -27.349 19.756 27.349 -19.756
Primary membrane
-3.094 -3.094 3.094 3.094 -3.797 -3.797 3.797 3.797
longitudinal stress*
Shear from Mt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Circ shear from Vc 20.319 20.319 -20.319 -20.319 0 0 0 0
Long shear from VL 0 0 0 0 -47.176 -47.176 47.176 47.176
Total Shear stress 20.319 20.319 -20.319 -20.319 -47.176 -47.176 47.176 47.176
Combined stress (PL+Pb+Q) -82.47 72.065 82.47 -72.065 95.266 95.477 95.266 95.477
Note: * denotes primary stress.

75/109
PROGRAM NAME : MH-DAVIT

VERSION : 1.0
MANHOLE DAVIT CALCULATION
SIZE : 4" SCH.XXS

DESIGN DATA
MATERIAL OF PIPE DAVIT SA53 Gr.B(E)
MINIMUM SPECIFIED YIELD STRESS OF PIPE DAVIT Fy = 24.608 KG/MM2
ELASTIC MODULUS OF PIPE DAVIT E = 20741.0 KG/MM2
VERTICAL IMPACT FACTOR Cv = 1.5 -
HORIZONTAL IMPACT FACTOR Ch = 0.2 -
WEIGHT OF BOOM W1 = 161.5 KG
TOTAL WEIGHT OF DAVIT WD = 189.4 KG
MAXIMUM RATED CAPACITY WL = 1100 KG
AXIAL LOAD P = 3489.4 KG
EQUIVALENT RADIAL LOAD Fre = < TABLE-1>
BENDING MOMENT IN MAST AT TOP GUIDE OR SUPPORT M1 = 1413636.8 KG-MM
MAXIMUM BENDING MOMENT IN CURVED DAVIT M2 = 1191765.5 KG-MM
LONGITUDINAL MOMENT Mx = 419079.6 KG-MM
CIRCUMFERENTIAL MOMENT Mφ = 499375.8 KG-MM
ALLOWABLE AXIAL STRESS Fa = 8.435 KG/MM2
ALLOWABLE BENDING STRESS Fb = 14.765 KG/MM2
STRESS COEFFICIENTS (MAX. VALUE) α,β,K = 1.466 -
WALL THICKNESS OF PIPE DAVIT td = 17.1 MM
OUTSIDE RADIUS OF PIPE DAVIT a = 57.15 MM
MEAN RADIUS OF PIPE DAVIT Rm = 48.6 MM
MOMENT OF INERTIA I = 6357587.8 MM4
CROSS - SECTIONAL AREA A = 5221.7 MM2
CROSS - SECTION MODULUS Z = 111243.9 MM3
LEAST RADIUS OF GYRATION r = 34.89 MM
L1
BOOM L1 = 590 MM
L2 = 1784 MM
L3 = 340 MM
L2 R L4 = 120.1 MM
L5 = N/A MM
R = 280 MM
L3 PIPE I.D : 80.1 MM

PIPE O.D : 114.3 MM
L4
76/109

VERSION : 1.0
1.MOMENT AND FORCES IN DAVIT AND VESSEL
(1) LOAD ON DAVIT
fv = Cv × WL = 1.5 × 1100 = 1650 KG
fh = Ch × WL = 0.2 × 1100 = 220 KG
(2) BENDING MOMENT IN DAVIT MAST (M1)
M1 = fv×L1 + (0.5×W1×L1) + (fh×L2)
= 1650 × 590 + 0.5 × 161.5 × 590 + 220 × 1784
= 1413636.8 KG-MM
(3) RADIAL FORCE AT GUIDE AND SUPPORT (Fr)
M1 1413636.8
Fr = = = 4,158 KG
L3 340
Fr IS MAXIMUM WHEN DAVIT ROTATION φ IS AT 0 DEG. FOR OTHER ROTATION
Fr = Fr × COSφ = 4,158 × 0.707 = 2,940 KG
(4) CIRCUMFERENTIAL MOMENT AT GUIDE AND SUPPORT (Mφ)
Mφ = Fr × L4 = 4,158 × 120.1 = 499375.8 KG-MM
Mφ IS MAXIMUM WHEN DAVIT ROTATION φ IS AT 90 DEG. FOR OTHER ROTATION
Mφ = Fr × SINφ × L4 = 4,158 × 0.707 × 120.1 = 353112.0 KG-MM
(5) AXIAL LOAD ON DAVIT MAST (P)
P = 2 × fv + WD = 2 × 1650 + 189.4 = 3489.4 KG
(6) LONGITUDINAL MOMENT AT SUPPORT (Mx)
Mx = P × L4 = 3,489.4 × 120.1 = 419079.6 KG-MM

77/109

VERSION : 1.0
2. STRESS IN DAVIT
< MASTER PROPERTIES >
d = 80.1
d D D = 114.3
π(D4 - d4)
I = = 6357588 MM4
64
π(D2 - d2)
A = = 5222 MM2
4
I π(D4 - d4)
Z = = = 111244 MM3
a 32×D
I
r = = 34.89 MM
A
td = 17.1 MM a = 57.15 MM
< SLENDERNESS RATIO >
K × L2 2.1 × 1784
KC = = = 107.4
r 34.89
CC = [(2 × π2 × E)/Fy]0.5 = 129.0
[ 1 - (KC^2)/(2×CC^2) ] × Fy
Fa =
5/3 + 3(KC)/(8×CC) - (KC)^3/(8×CC^3)
= 8.435 KG/MM2
Fb = 0.6 × Fy = 0.6 × 24.608 = 14.765 KG/MM2

78/109

VERSION : 1.0
(1) AXIAL STRESS

P 3489.4
fa = = = 0.668 KG/MM2
A 5222
(2) BENDING MOMENT (M2)
M1 × ( L2 - R ) 1,413,636.8 × 1504
M2 = = = 1191766 KG-MM
L2 1784
(3) BENDING STRESS
AT M1, M1 1413636.8
fb = = = 12.708 KG/MM2
Z 111244
AT M2,
M2 x a 2
fb = × = 9.513 KG/MM2
I 3K × 3β
< COEFFICIENTS >
td × R 17.100 × 280
α = = = 1.466
2
a 57.15
6 6
β = = = 0.335
2
5 + 6α 5 + 6×2.149
9 9
K = 1 - = 1 - = 0.749
2
10 + 12α 10 + 12×2.149
4) COMBINED STRESS
fa fb 0.668 12.708
Sc = + = +
Fa Fb 8.435 14.765
= 0.940 < 1.0 (O.K !!)

79/109
HYDRO. TEST PRESSURE
DESIGN PRESSURE = 89 Bar.G

M.A.W.P. = 89 Bar.G
DESIGN TEMP. = 85 ℃
ALLOWABLE STRESS AT DESIGN TEMP. : Sd

ALLOWABLE STRESS AT ATM. TEMP. : Sa
THE LOWEST RATIO Lst = 1.0
A) Ph1 = 1.25 x M.A.W.P. x Lst

= 1.25 x 89 x 1
= 111.25 Bar.G
B) Ph2 = 1.43 x M.A.W.P.

= 1.43 x 89
= 127.27 Bar.G
C) Ph3 = 1.5 x D.P.

= 1.5 x 89
= 133.5 Bar.G
THE LARGER VALUE OF A OR B OR C = 133.5 Bar.G
THUS, SHOP HYDRO. TEST PRESSURE = 133.5 Bar.G

Test Report 80/109
Shop test pressure determination for Chamber bounded by Bottom Head and Top Head based on user defined pressure
Shop test gauge pressure is 133.5 bar at 10 °C
The shop test is performed with the vessel in the horizontal position.
Local test Test liquid Stress Allowable

Stress
Identifier pressure static head during test test stress
2 2 excessive?
bar bar kgf/cm kgf/cm
Top Head 133.73 0.23 1,494.297 2,028.214 No
Straight Flange on Top Head 133.73 0.23 1,561.488 2,028.214 No
Shell 133.73 0.23 1,698.8 2,028.214 No
Straight Flange on Bottom Head 133.73 0.23 1,561.488 2,028.214 No
Bottom Head 133.73 0.23 1,494.297 2,028.214 No
Nozzle (MW1) 133.77 0.27 1,939.379 3,028.555 No
Nozzle (MW2) 133.64 0.14 1,944.409 3,028.555 No
Nozzle (N2) 133.63 0.13 1,734.678 3,028.555 No
Notes:
(1) PL stresses at nozzle openings have been estimated using the method described in PVP-Vol. 399, pages 77-82.
(2) 1.5*0.9*Sy used as the basis for the maximum local primary membrane stress at the nozzle intersection PL.
(3) The zero degree angular position is assumed to be up, and the test liquid height is assumed to the top-most flange.
The field test condition has not been investigated for the Chamber bounded by Bottom Head and Top Head.
The test temperature of 10 °C is warmer than the minimum recommended temperature of -29.3 °C so the brittle fracture provision of UG-99(h) has
been met.
Corroded Test Report 81/109
The shop test condition has not been investigated for the Chamber bounded by Bottom Head and Top Head.
Field test pressure determination for Chamber bounded by Bottom Head and Top Head based on user defined pressure
Field test gauge pressure is 133.5 bar at 10 °C
The field test is performed with the vessel in the vertical position.
Local test Test liquid Stress Allowable

Stress
Identifier pressure static head during test test stress
2 2 excessive?
bar bar kgf/cm kgf/cm
Top Head 133.63 0.13 1,545.17 2,028.214 No
Straight Flange on Top Head 133.63 0.13 1,607.389 2,028.214 No
Shell 133.97 0.47 1,757.755 2,028.214 No
Straight Flange on Bottom Head 133.97 0.47 1,611.455 2,028.214 No
Bottom Head 134.03 0.53 1,549.746 2,028.214 No
Nozzle (MW1) 133.94 0.44 2,010.012 3,028.555 No
Nozzle (MW2) 133.56 0.06 2,029.333 3,028.555 No
Nozzle (N2) 134.11 0.61 1,823.051 3,028.555 No
Notes:
(1) PL stresses at nozzle openings have been estimated using the method described in PVP-Vol. 399, pages 77-82.
(2) 1.5*0.9*Sy used as the basis for the maximum local primary membrane stress at the nozzle intersection PL.
82/109
PROGRAM NAME : FW03
VERSION : 1.0
******************** F L A N G E C A L C U L A T I O N ************************
(AS PER ASME SECT.VIII, DIV.1,APPENDIX-2)
[DESIGN CONDITION] PART : MW1 & MW2 NOZZLE FLANGE
* D E S I G N D A T A *
DESIGN PRESS. = 90.78 KG/CM2.G (89 Bar.G) FLANGE MATERIAL = SA350 LF.2 CL.1
DESIGN TEMP. = 85 ℃ BOLT MATERIAL = SA320 Gr.L7M
* FLANGE ALLOWABLE STRESS *
AT DESIGN TEMP. Sfo = 14.072 KG/MM2 , AT ATM TEMP.Sfa = 14.072 KG/MM2
* BOLT ALLOWABLE STRESS *
AT DESIGN TEMP. So = 14.072 KG/MM2 , AT ATM TEMP.Sa = 14.072 KG/MM2
* GASKET DATA *
GASKET MATERIAL = OCTAGONAL RING (C.S) ( O.D : 711.03 × I.D : 679.27 ) [RIB GASKET]
NORMAL WIDTH, N = 15.88 MM ALLOW. STRESS y1 = 12.644 KG/MM2 0 (y2)
EFFECTIVE WIDTH b = 1.99 MM GASKET FACTOR m1 = 5.5 0 (m2)
2
H = π×G ×P/400 = 344538.0 Kgf
HP = (2b πG m1 + RA m2) ×P/100 = 43288.4 Kgf *** RIB AREA OF GASKET ***
Wm1 = H + HP = 387826.4 Kgf RA = N/A MM2
Wm2 = πb G y1 + (RA/2)y2 = 54811.7 Kgf
Am = LARGER OF Wm1/So OR Wm2/Sa = 27560.1 MM2
Ab = π×dB2×n/4 = 35674.6 MM2 , Am < Ab (O.K !!)
W = 0.5(Am+Ab)Sa = 444919.9 Kgf
Nmin= Ab ×Sa/(2y ×π×G) = 9.09 MM
Nmin.< N , ( GASKET WIDTH O.K !! )
* BOLT DATA *
BOLT SIZE = U 1 7/8
BOLT Q'TY = 24
dB = 43.504 MM (EFFECTIVE BOLT DIA.)
G = 695.15 MM (GASKET MEAN DIA.)
83/109
*********************************************
NI NOZZLE NECK AND HOOK
*********************************************
☞ DESIGN DATA
MATERIAL OF NI NOZZLE NECK = SA420 Gr.WPL6
MATERIAL OF HOOK = SA36
YIELD STRESS OF NI NOZZLE NECK Syn = 24.473 KG/MM2
YIELD STRESS OF HOOK Syh = 25.493 KG/MM2
ALLOWABLE STRESS OF N1 NECK (0.6 x Syn) Sn = 14.684 KG/MM2
ALLOWABLE STRESS OF HOOK (0.6 x Syh) Sh = 15.296 KG/MM2
MAX. LOADING W = 1100 KG
CROSS AREA OF N1 NOZZLE NECK An = 12239.02 MM2
CROSS AREA OF HOOK Ah = 283.53 MM2
1 . STRESS OF NI NOZZLE NECK
W 1100
S = =
An 12239.0
= 0.090 < Sn = 14.684 KG/MM2 O.K
2 . STRESS OF NI HOOK
W 1100
S = =
Ah 283.5
= 3.880 < Sh = 15.296 KG/MM2 O.K

KOREA ENGINEERING CONSULTING, INC STRESS ANALYSIS FOR TAILING LUGS 84/109
PROGRAM : NISA(NISA SOFTWARE, INC.) REV. NO. : 1
ITEM : 24-VF-6723A/B PAGE NO. : 1 / 26
STRESS ANALYSIS REPORT

for
TAILING LUG
Submitted to
ULP CO., LTD.
ULSAN KOREA
4
3
2
04/24 04/24 04/24

1 FOR APPROVAL
2015 2015 2015
04/15 04/15 04/15

0 FOR APPROVAL
2015 2015 2015
REV DESCRIPTIONS PREPARED BY REVIEWED BY APPROVED BY
April 24, 2015

Report Number : A-2015-04-15-A
Rev.1
ITEM : 24-VF-6723A/B PAGE NO. : 2 / 26
[LIST OF CONTENTS]
1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................... 3
2. DESIGN CRITERIA .................................................................................................................. 4
2.1 DESIGN CONDITION ........................................................................................................ 4
3. FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS ............................................................................................... 5
3.1 MATERIAL DATA ............................................................................................................. 5
3.2 FE MODEL .......................................................................................................................... 6
3.3 BOUNDARY CONDITIONS .............................................................................................. 7
3.4 LOADING CONDITIONS .................................................................................................. 8
4. FEA RESULT ............................................................................................................................ 9
5. CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................................... 11
APPENDIX-"A".....................................................................................................................12~26
-.FE Model & Stress Figures of Model
ITEM : 24-VF-6723A/B PAGE NO. : 3 / 26
1. INTRODUCTION
For evaluating the stability analysis of the H2S REMOVAL GUARD BED(24-VF-
6723A/B) for some components under several kinds of load combinations based on the use of
Specification Material & Erection Load Datasheet depending on the loading conditions,
detailed respective FE analysis and load functionality are considered the effect of maximum
critical design load cases for comparison to acceptance criteria to determine the suitability of a
components.
A) Tailing Lug Part : Stability Analysis in Erection Cases
This report summarizes the stress analysis on tailing lug area and skirt bracing support
parts under defined erection loading conditions. The stability of tailing lug and skirt support with
base ring components are performed by means of FEA (Finite Element Analysis).
The analyses are performed under erection design load condition to determine
comparison to acceptance criteria and the suitability of a components based on the design
requirements for application of the design-by-analysis methodology described in ASME 2013 Part
5 and User Design Specification for stress evaluation which are provided as part of the design for
an accurate stress analysis including validation of all results
This analysis is accomplished by using the NISA program (Version 17.1), which is based
on the Finite Element Method (FEM) and recognized internationally for following purposes.
. Linear/Nonlinear Static Analysis

. Heat Transfer Analysis
. Dynamic Analysis
. Fatigue & Crack / Fracture Mechanics Analysis
. Optimization Analysis
. 3D Fluid Flow Analysis
ITEM : 24-VF-6723A/B PAGE NO. : 4 / 26
2. DESIGN CRITERIA
The design criteria of the equipment is provided by the Owner's Design Specification
and the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The equipment is analyzed using the codes
and standards in the following design condition.
2.1 DESIGN CONDITION
1) Code : ASME SEC. VIII Div.1, 2013 ED.
2)Design Pressure(barg) (int/ext) : 89.0 / F.V
3) Design Temperature(C) (int/ext) : 85.0 / -45.0
4) Corrosion Allowance(mm) : 3.0

ITEM : 24-VF-6723A/B PAGE NO. : 5 / 26
3. FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS
3.1 MATERIAL DATA
The material data in this model are taken from 2013Edition, ASME Code Sec. Ⅱ, Part D,
Table TM-1 for elastic modulus and Table PRD for Poisson’s ratio, respectively. And the
allowable stresses for the materials used in the construction of this air cooler are taken from Table
1A of ASME Code Sec.II, Part D.
So values of elastic modulus, allowable stress and Poisson’s ratio are listed in Table 1 as
a function of temperature.
[Table 1] Material data for Stability analysis in Erection Design Condition

Material SA 516-60
Analysis Sections Skirt / Tailing Lug
Nominal composition Carbon Steel
S 118.0
E 20.0C 202,350
ν 0.3
* E : Young's Modulus [MPa]
*ν: Poisson's Ratio
* S : Allowable stress value [MPa]
ITEM : 24-VF-6723A/B PAGE NO. : 6 / 26
3.2 FE MODEL
The general purpose finite element software NISA II and its common graphical pre and
post processor DISPLAY III has been used for finite element modeling and analysis. The details of
formulation, capabilities and validation of the finite element library can be found in NISA users
and verification manual.
This model have been modeled by using 3D shell model (4-node quadrilateral Element:
NKTP=20) to evaluate the stresses of lifting tailing lug and its related components under design
erection condition.
In order to get more accurate results, finer mesh capabilities are considered in this
model considering approximately aspect ratio 1: 1~2. The total number of nodes and elements
are tabulated in Table 2.
A. The total number of nodes and elements for FE models  Table 2
[Table 2] Number of Nodes and Elements

Model
Component Model-type Nodes Elements
No.
1 Skirt / Tailing Lug 3D Shell 67,800 67,371
ITEM : 24-VF-6723A/B PAGE NO. : 7 / 26
3.3 BOUNDARY CONDITION
The scope of analysis for tailing lug limits to study the stresses in base ring and bracing
beams are. Appropriate extents of skirt are considered for application of displacement boundary
condition.
The boundary conditions on proper extension section of skirt support are constrained as
all DOF as shown in Fig. 3.
The detailed boundary conditions for models are shown below:
 Model 1 : Fig. 3
ITEM : 24-VF-6723A/B PAGE NO. : 8 / 26
3.4 LOAD CONDITIONS
For evaluating the various stress components occurred on tailing lug connection to
reinforcing pad area under Lifting force(X&Y&Z-direction) due to erection weight of vessel
acting on tailing lug, the following loads are defined in Table 3.
Rigid link is employed at the center of tailing lug to apply the lifting loads. Specified
loads are shown in table 3 and applied to master node of rigid rink.
Various load conditions from lifting lug calculation sheet are considered the effect of
lifting load direction in FEA. As the result of checking the stresses, the assessment for two load
cases is analyzed and occurred in stresses and represented in attached figures.
The details of specified lifting load conditions applied to the Finite Element Analysis for
tailing lugs are presents below.
-. Lifting Weight of Vessel (We) : 39,200.0 kg

-. Dynamic Load Factor (F) : 1.5
-. Total Lifting Weight of Vessel (W=We ⅹ F) : 58,800.0 kg
-. Number of Lifting Device (N, Tailing Lug ) : 1
[Table 3] Loading Conditions for Lugs with Lifting Weight

Angle Lifting Force (N)
Load Case No.
(°) Fx Fy Fz
Model 1 Load Case1 0.0 230,867.2 0.0 0.0
(Tailing Lug) Load Case2 58.0 88,229.4 0.0 141,196.1

ITEM : 24-VF-6723A/B PAGE NO. : 9 / 26
4. STRESS EVALUATION
NISA II solver has been employed to carry out linear elastic response analysis. The
results from the analysis have been processed to determine the stress in the critically stressed
regions in these models under design condition.
The requirement for the acceptability of a design is that the calculated Equivalent Stress
(Von-Mises Stress) shall not exceed specified allowable Equivalent Stress limits described in
Figures 5.1[Stress Categories and Limits of Equivalent Stress] of ASME Sec. VIII, Div. 2, Part 5.
The stress results are evaluated for compliance with the criteria cited in Table
5.6[Examples of Stress Classification] of ASME Code Sec. VIII, Div. 2, Part 5 for the various
categories of equivalent stress. These include;
1) Primary General Membrane : Pm < 1.0  S

2) Primary Local Membrane : PL < 1.5  S
3) Primary Local Membrane + Bending : PL+Pb < 1.5  S
4) Primary + Secondary : PL+Pb+Q < 3.0  S
5) Bending Sb < 0.66  Sy
A quantity known as the equivalent stress is computed at any locations in the component
and compared to an allowable stress value of equivalent stress to determine if the component is
suitable for the intended design conditions. The equivalent stress at a point, in a component is a
measure of stress, calculated from stress components utilizing a yield criterion, which is used for
comparison with the mechanical strength properties in accordance with ASME Sec.II, Part D.
The stresses are occurred by the constrained of the adjacent part. So, the stress category
of Primary Local Membrane and Primary plus Secondary equivalent stresses are considered for
load cases in accordance with ASME Code Sec. VIII, Div.2.
ITEM : 24-VF-6723A/B PAGE NO. : 10 / 26
[Table 4] Stress Result for Lifting Tailing Lug Parts

Stress Evaluation [MPa]
Load Evaluation
Case Point Von-Mises Allowable FE
Descriptions
Stress (MPa) Value Result
Middle 65.37 177.00 PL(1.5 S) OK
Shell-to-
1
Tailing Top 119.7 354.00 PL+Pb+Q(3S) OK
(At 0°)
Junction
Bottom 119.7 354.00 PL+Pb+Q(3S) OK
Middle 73.19 177.00 PL(1.5 S) OK

Shell-to-
2
Tailing Top 128.8 354.00 PL+Pb+Q(3S) OK
(At 58°)
Junction
Bottom 101.6 354.00 PL+Pb+Q(3S) OK
[Table 5] Bending Stress Result of Skirt Bracing Support

Stress Evaluation [MPa]
Load Evaluation
Von-Mises Allowable FE
Case Point Descriptions
Stress (MPa) Value Result
1 Bracing
25.89 134.64 Sb=0.66 Sy OK
(At 0°) Beam
2 Bracing
23.02 134.64 Sb=0.66 Sy OK
(At 58°) Beam
ITEM : 24-VF-6723A/B PAGE NO. : 11 / 26
5. CONCLUSION
The stress evaluation of the equipment Unit is applied to ASME Code Sec. VIII, Div.2.
For the stress evaluation of the Equipment Unit, the stability analysis is made by using FEM
software of NISAⅡ/DISPLAYⅢ. The equivalent stress values by means of FE stability analysis
are used to find the acceptable limits (S) in these evaluation regions.
The results from the analysis have been processed to determine Von-Mises Stress in the
critically stressed regions of tailing lug under all applicable applied load conditions. The stress
results from finite element stress analysis are found to be comparable with those obtained from
the rule based on design calculations. The skirt, tailing lug with bracing support beams are
considered safe under erection load case conditions(i.e considering approximately aspect ratio 1:
1~3 at the stress evaluation zone for element size). It is observed that the stresses in bracing beam,
base ring of tailing lug-to-pad junction and skirt-to-pad junctions under erection load conditions
with other mechanical loads are well within allowable limits.
Therefore the design of skirt, tailing lug with bracing support beams complies with the
code requirements and is considered safe.
ITEM : 24-VF-6723A/B PAGE NO. : 12 / 26
Appendix-“A”
-. FE Model & Stress Figures of Model
ITEM : 24-VF-6723A/B PAGE NO. : 13 / 26
Skirt Support
Bracing Support Beam
FIG.1 FE Model for Tailing Lug

ITEM : 24-VF-6723A/B PAGE NO. : 14 / 26
Tailing Lug
FIG.2 FE Model for Tailing Lug

ITEM : 24-VF-6723A/B PAGE NO. : 15 / 26
All DOF : Fixed
FZ
FY
FX
Lifting Forces
FIG.3 Boundary and Loading Condition for Tailing Lug-

ITEM : 24-VF-6723A/B PAGE NO. : 16 / 26
FIG.4 Von-Mises Stress for Tailing Lug Area(Load Case 1 : 0°)

KOREA ENGINEERING CONSULTING, INC STRESS ANALYSIS FOR TAILING LUGS100/109
ITEM : 24-VF-6723A/B PAGE NO. : 17 / 26
Peak stresses for these points of the abruptly structural

variation occurred in very small area is not evaluated.
FIG.5 Von-Mises Stress for Tailing Lug Area(Load Case 1 : 0°)

ITEM : 24-VF-6723A/B PAGE NO. : 18 / 26
FIG.6 Von-Mises Stress for Tailing Lug Area( Load Case 1 : 0°)
ITEM : 24-VF-6723A/B PAGE NO. : 19 / 26
ITEM : 24-VF-6723A/B PAGE NO. : 20 / 26
ITEM : 24-VF-6723A/B PAGE NO. : 21 / 26
FIG.9 Von-Mises Stress(Combined) for Bracing Support Beam( Load Case 1 : 0° )

ITEM : 24-VF-6723A/B PAGE NO. : 22 / 26
ITEM : 24-VF-6723A/B PAGE NO. : 23 / 26
ITEM : 24-VF-6723A/B PAGE NO. : 24 / 26
ITEM : 24-VF-6723A/B PAGE NO. : 25 / 26
ITEM : 24-VF-6723A/B PAGE NO. : 26 / 26
FIG.14 Von-Mises Stress(Combined) for Bracing Support Beam( Load Case 2 : 58°)

FPSO Motion Load - Vertical

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

FPSO Motion Load - Vertical

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

FPSO Motion Load - Vertical

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1 OF 109

UOP Process Plants Specification

UOP PROJECT NO. : G6135

EQUIPMENT : GAS TREATMENT UNIT

END CLIENT : PREMIER OIL UK LIMITED

CLIENT REF. NO. : 4307

LOCATION : NORTH SEA

PURCHASE ORDER NO. : 60407

Project: CATCHER DEVELOPMENT Document Family: ANST

5 12.06.2015 Ikhan Cho Ilseop Eom Jinyeol Jeon

No. SUBJECT PAGE

8 SHELL & HEAD 11 ~ 23

12 WAVE MOTION LOAD 42 ~ 49

14 SKIRT & BASE RING 53 ~ 61

15 LIFTING & TAILING LUG 62 ~ 68

17 LIFTING & TAILING LUG LOCAL CHECK 72 ~ 74

19 HYDRO. TEST REPORT 79 ~ 81

20 CHECK OF STUD BOLT 82

21 N1 NOZZLE NECK & HOOK 83

22 ㅣ STRESS ANALYSIS REPORT FOR TAILING LUG | 84 ~ 109

ITEM NO. : 24-VF-6723A/B

DESIGN INPUT DATA

CLASSIFICATION SOCIETY INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION BODY (ICP) : DNV GL

FLUID NATURAL GAS -

2. MATERIAL ACCORDING TO NACE MR0175

COMPRESS 2014 Build 7400

Datum Line Location: -50.00 mm from bottom seam

ASME Section VIII Division 1, 2013 Edition Metric

Design or Rating: Get Thickness from Pressure

Shop Hydrotest at user defined pressure

Required Marking - UG-116

UG-116(e) Radiography: RT1

Use Code Case 2547: No

UG-22(a) Internal or External Design Pressure : Yes

Top Head 89 85 92.92 52.36 85 -51 Note 1 Yes

Straight Flange on Top Head 89 85 99.14 64.72 85 -51 Note 2 Yes

Shell 89 85 90.95 59.46 85 -46.3 Note 3 Yes

Straight Flange on Bottom Head 89 85 99.14 64.72 85 -51 Note 2 Yes

Bottom Head 89 85 92.92 52.36 85 -51 Note 4 Yes

Nozzle (MW1) 89 85 89 1.03 85 -49 Note 5 No

Nozzle (MW2) 89 85 89 1.03 85 -49 Note 6 No

Nozzle (N2) 89 85 89 1.03 85 -49 Note 7 No

Chamber design MDMT is -45 °C

Chamber MAWP hot & corroded is 89 bar @ 85 °C

Chamber MAEP is 1.03 bar @ 85 °C

Notes for Maximum Pressure Rating:

Notes for MDMT Rating:

Note # Exemption Details

1. Straight Flange governs MDMT

UCS-66(i) reduction of 6 °C applied (ratio =

UCS-66(i) reduction of 1.3 °C applied (ratio =

4. Straight Flange governs MDMT

Design notes are available on the Settings Summary page.

NPS 24 Class 600 NPS 24 Class 600

NPS 24 Class 600 NPS 24 Class 600

NPS 10 Class 600

tn: Nozzle thickness

Top Head SA-516 60 2,345 ID 682.55 96.3* 92.34 3 1.00 Internal

Shell SA-516 60 2,345 ID 3,400 98 95.86 3 1.00 Internal

t = PD / (2SE - 0.2P) + Corrosion

t = 1.67PeD / (2SE - 0.21.67Pe) + Corrosion

P = 2SE*t / ((D + 0.2t)1.67) - Ps2

EFE = (75t / Rf)(1 - Rf / Ro)

t = PR / (SE - 0.60*P) + Corrosion

Pa = 4B / (3(Do / t))

Pa = 4B / (3(Do / t))

EFE = (50t / Rf)(1 - Rf / Ro)

Pv = (1 + VAccel)W / (2πRm) + M / (πRm2)