Economics
Economics
Economics
1
5) Which of the following statements is true?
A) Gold is not a scarce resource.
B) Both life-saving drugs and ice cream are examples of scarce goods.
C) If a scarce resource is given away for free, everyone will be able to consume it.
D) Scarcity means that there is an imbalance between unlimited resources and limited wants.
Answer: B
Difficulty: Easy
Topic: Economic Agents and Economic Resources
9) ________ economics is analysis that generates objective descriptions or predictions about the
world that can be verified with data.
A) Positive
B) Negative
C) Marginal
D) Normative
Answer: A
Difficulty: Easy
Topic: Positive Economics and Normative Economics
2
10) Which of the following is an example of a positive economic statement?
A) The pricing policies of monopolies should be strictly supervised.
B) Unemployment is more harmful than inflation.
C) Higher interest rates will encourage more savings.
D) Pollution is one of the most serious economic problems.
Answer: C
Difficulty: Medium
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: Positive Economics and Normative Economics
3
14) Which of the following is an example of a normative economic statement?
A) An increase in government expenditure will lead to an increase in well-being.
B) An increase in the money supply will lead to an increase in the inflation rate.
C) An increase in income is accompanied by an increase in savings.
D) An increase in income is accompanied by an increase in consumption.
Answer: A
Difficulty: Medium
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: Positive Economics and Normative Economics
16) Which of the following statements correctly differentiates between positive and normative
economics?
A) Positive economics is descriptive, whereas normative economics is advisory.
B) Positive economics describes what people ought to do, whereas normative economics
describes what people actually do.
C) Positive economics is based on judgments, whereas normative economics is not.
D) Positive economics can only be applied to microeconomics, whereas normative economics
can be applied to both microeconomics and macroeconomics.
Answer: A
Difficulty: Easy
Topic: Positive Economics and Normative Economics
4
18) Which of the following statements is true?
A) Positive economics describes what people ought to do.
B) Normative economics describes what people actually do.
C) Positive economics generates objective descriptions that can be verified with data.
D) Normative economics is free from value judgments, tastes, and preferences of economic
agents.
Answer: C
Difficulty: Easy
Topic: Positive Economics and Normative Economics
19) ________ is the study of how individuals, households, governments, and firms make
choices and how those choices affect prices, the allocation of resources, and the well-being of
other agents.
A) Growth theory
B) Microeconomics
C) Macroeconomics
D) Monetary economics
Answer: B
Difficulty: Easy
Topic: Microeconomics and Macroeconomics
5
22) ________ is the study of an economy as a whole.
A) Microeconomics
B) Game theory
C) Behavioral economics
D) Macroeconomics
Answer: D
Difficulty: Easy
Topic: Microeconomics and Macroeconomics
6
26) Which of the following statements correctly highlights the difference between
microeconomics and macroeconomics?
A) Microeconomics is descriptive, whereas macroeconomics is advisory.
B) Microeconomics primarily deals with positive analysis, whereas macroeconomics primarily
deals with normative analysis.
C) Microeconomics deals with a small part of the economy, whereas macroeconomics deals with
aggregate economic performance.
D) Microeconomics describes what economic agents actually do, whereas macroeconomics
describes what economic agents ought to do.
Answer: C
Difficulty: Easy
Topic: Microeconomics and Macroeconomics
27) The understanding of why an economy is contracting during slowdowns and how to
recommend appropriate policies is studied under:
A) macroeconomics.
B) microeconomics.
C) agricultural economics.
D) international economics.
Answer: A
Difficulty: Easy
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: Microeconomics and Macroeconomics
28) Understanding the impact of carbon taxes on the energy usage of individual households and
firms is studied under:
A) microeconomics.
B) macroeconomics.
C) fiscal economics.
D) financial economics.
Answer: A
Difficulty: Medium
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: Microeconomics and Macroeconomics
29) The relationship between the unemployment rate and inflation is studied under:
A) microeconomics.
B) macroeconomics.
C) behavioral economics.
D) international economics.
Answer: B
Difficulty: Medium
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: Microeconomics and Macroeconomics
7
30) The relationship between a firm's advertising expenditure and its profit is studied under:
A) microeconomics.
B) macroeconomics.
C) public economics.
D) international economics.
Answer: A
Difficulty: Medium
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: Microeconomics and Macroeconomics
32) What are scarce resources? Why are economic agents concerned with the allocation of these
resources?
Answer: Scarce resources are resources for which the quantity that people want exceeds the
quantity that is freely available. Economic agents need to satisfy their unlimited wants in a world
of limited resources. This makes it important for them to understand how these scarce resources
are to be used and distributed in order to optimize allocation.
Difficulty: Easy
Topic: Economic Agents and Economic Resources
8
35) Robert and Janet are discussing unemployment and inflation in their country. Robert, on the
basis of a recent newspaper report, claims that a 5% reduction in unemployment will lead to a
2% rise in inflation. On the other hand, Janet insists that inflation is a far bigger problem than
unemployment and should be addressed with prime importance. Classify Robert's and Janet's
statements as descriptive or advisory. Explain your answer.
Answer: Robert claims that a 5% reduction in unemployment will lead to a rise in a 2% in
inflation. This statement represents predictions that can be verified with data. Therefore, Robert's
approach is positive, which means it is an analysis of things as they are. Positive economics
describes what has happened or predicts what will happen. The conclusion of his statement can
be verified with data and is not subject to his tastes and preferences.
Janet claims that inflation is a far bigger problem than unemployment and should be addressed
with prime importance. Janet's statement is normative. Normative economics is analysis that
recommends what people ought to do. Unlike Robert's statement, Janet's belief that inflation is a
bigger problem than unemployment is based on her values and/or ethical judgments. Therefore,
while Robert's statement is descriptive in nature, Janet's statement is advisory.
Difficulty: Medium
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: Positive Economics and Normative Economics
36) Classify the following as positive economics statements or normative economics statements.
a) An increase in an individual's income increases consumption, but by an amount less than the
increase in income.
b) The government should undertake the responsibility of providing healthcare to all its citizens.
c) A negative current account deficit can be advantageous to an economy.
d) An increase in net exports has a positive effect on a country's national income.
e) The gross domestic product of India is increasing at 5% annually.
Answer: The statements can be classified as follows:
a) An increase in an individual's income increases consumption, but by an amount less than the
increase in income: Positive economic statement
b) The government should undertake the responsibility of providing healthcare to all its citizens:
Normative economic statement
c) A negative current account deficit can be advantageous to an economy: Normative
economic statement
d) An increase in net exports has a positive effect on a country's national income: Positive
economic statement
e) The gross domestic product of India is increasing at 5% annually: Positive economic
statement
Difficulty: Medium
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: Positive Economics and Normative Economics
9
37) a) A recent news report stated that the unemployment rate in the country Lithasia had
increased from 10.2% to 18.2% from 2003 to 2013 and that the government has adopted strict
fiscal measures to expand employment. Would this report be considered microeconomic or
macroeconomic analysis?
b) Students in a class are discussing how a monopolist should determine his profit-maximizing
output. Would this discussion be considered microeconomic or macroeconomic analysis?
Answer:
a) This report will pertain to macroeconomics. Macroeconomics refers to the study of an
economy as a whole. Macroeconomics covers economy-wide phenomena, like the growth rate of
a country's total economic output, the inflation rate, or the unemployment rate. The report
suggests that the total unemployment rate in Lithasia has increased from 10.2% to 18.2% from
2003 to 2013. This estimation is a measure of the economy-wide aggregate unemployment, and
is covered under macroeconomics.
b) Microeconomics is the study of how individuals, households, firms, and governments make
choices. The students are discussing how a single monopolist should determine its profit-
maximizing output. This is a discussion of an individual entity and so is considered
microeconomic analysis.
Difficulty: Medium
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: Microeconomics and Macroeconomics
10
3) Empiricism is analysis that uses ________ to test theories.
A) data
B) illustrations
C) philosophy
D) value judgments
Answer: A
Difficulty: Easy
Topic: Three Principles of Economics
11
1.3 The First Principle of Economics: Optimization
3) A consumer has $40 that he wants to spend. He is faced with four options: a camera that costs
$60, a cell phone that costs $150, a book that costs $10, and a Bluetooth speaker that costs $45.
Which of the following is a feasible option for the consumer?
A) The book
B) The camera
C) The cell phone
D) The Bluetooth speaker
Answer: A
Difficulty: Easy
Topic: The First Principle of Economics: Optimization
12
5) Which of the following statements is true?
A) Optimization requires individuals to foresee the future perfectly.
B) An optimizing individual need not consider the risks involved in various choices.
C) An optimizing individual is also likely to exhibit rationality.
D) The less information that is available, the easier it is to make optimal decisions.
Answer: C
Difficulty: Easy
Topic: The First Principle of Economics: Optimization
7) Which of the following correctly identifies the trade-off that a budget constraint represents?
A) The amount of income that must be given up to obtain an additional unit of a good
B) The maximum amount of two goods that a consumer can purchase given his income
C) The optimum combination of goods that a consumer with a given income should purchase
D) The amount of one good that has to be given up to purchase an additional unit of the other
good
Answer: D
Difficulty: Easy
Topic: Trade-offs and Budget Constraints
13
9) Which of the following statements is true?
A) A budget constraint is the same for a consumer at all levels of income.
B) A budget constraint quantifies the trade-offs that economic agents face while making
decisions.
C) A budget constraint is a function of the income of the consumer and not the prices of the
goods and services available for consumption.
D) A budget constraint is based on the minimum amount of money that an economic agent can
spend on goods and services.
Answer: B
Difficulty: Easy
Topic: Trade-offs and Budget Constraints
10) A consumer has $20 that he wants to spend on two goods: pens priced at $2 each, and pencils
priced at $1 each. Which of the following correctly represents his budget constraint?
A) $20 = ($2/Quantity of pens) + ($1/Quantity of pencils)
B) $20 = ($2 × Quantity of pens) + ($1 × Quantity of pencils)
C) $20 = ($3/Quantity of pens + Quantity of pencils)
D) $20 = $3 × (Quantity of pens - Quantity of pencils)
Answer: B
Difficulty: Medium
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: Trade-offs and Budget Constraints
11) An individual has 8 hours to spare. He has to divide his time between two activities: reading
and writing. Which of the following allocations will exactly satisfy the individual's budget
constraint?
A) 3 hours of reading and 4 hours of writing
B) 4 hours of reading and 6 hours of writing
C) 2 hours of reading and 2 hours of writing
D) 5 hours of reading and 3 hours of writing
Answer: D
Difficulty: Easy
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: Trade-offs and Budget Constraints
12) A consumer has $50 to spend. He has to decide between buying two goods: magazines
priced at $5 each and DVDs priced at $10 each. Which of the following combinations of the two
goods will exactly satisfy his budget constraint?
A) 3 magazines and 4 DVDs
B) 2 magazines and 4 DVDs
C) 6 magazines and 1 DVD
D) 2 magazines and 2 DVDs
Answer: B
Difficulty: Medium
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: Trade-offs and Budget Constraints
14
13) Which of the following statements is true?
A) All rational economic agents attempt to maximize their income.
B) A rational consumer makes his decisions depending on what the majority chooses.
C) A budget constraint is an economic tool that quantifies the trade-off between consumption of
two goods.
D) A trade-off refers to the exchange of goods between economic agents through a barter system
or mutual exchange.
Answer: C
Difficulty: Easy
Topic: Trade-offs and Budget Constraints
15) A student has two options: she can either surf the web, or work part-time. Working part-time
pays her $20 per hour. What is the student's opportunity cost of surfing the web for 5 hours?
A) $4
B) $20
C) $50
D) $100
Answer: D
Difficulty: Medium
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: Opportunity Cost
16) John has to choose between two jobs: one that offers him $50 per hour and one that offers
him $35 per hour. The opportunity cost of choosing the job that offers him $50 per hour is:
A) $1.5 per hour.
B) $15 per hour.
C) $35 per hour.
D) $85 per hour.
Answer: C
Difficulty: Medium
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: Opportunity Cost
15
17) ________ is a calculation that adds up costs and benefits using a common unit of
measurement, like dollar values.
A) Cost-benefit analysis
B) Revenue-income analysis
C) Budget constraint analysis
D) Expenditure-income analysis
Answer: A
Difficulty: Easy
Topic: Cost-Benefit Analysis
19) Suppose that Jinelle, an engineer, has to choose between two jobs. Which of the following
statements is true?
A) When deciding between both jobs, she should consider both wage and non-wage attributes of
each job.
B) While deciding between jobs, she should focus only on the costs of each job and ignore the
benefits.
C) While deciding between jobs, she should only focus on the benefits from each job and ignore
the costs.
D) While deciding between jobs, she should consider the wage attributes and ignore the non-
wage attributes of each job.
Answer: A
Difficulty: Easy
Topic: Cost-Benefit Analysis
16
21) Out of a set of feasible alternatives, an optimizer should choose the alternative with the:
A) highest net benefit.
B) highest opportunity cost.
C) lowest total cost, regardless of benefit.
D) highest total benefit, regardless of cost.
Answer: A
Difficulty: Easy
Topic: Cost-Benefit Analysis
22) If a particular choice that an individual faces gives him a benefit of $20 but costs $30, the net
benefit from making this choice equals:
A) $20.
B) $10.
C) -$10.
D) -$30.
Answer: C
Difficulty: Easy
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: Cost-Benefit Analysis
23) If a job pays a wage of $50 per hour, but has a non-wage cost valued at $20 per hour, the net
benefit of taking the job equals:
A) $2.5 per hour.
B) $20 per hour.
C) $30 per hour.
D) $70 per hour.
Answer: C
Difficulty: Medium
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: Cost-Benefit Analysis
Scenario: Maria has to choose between driving and taking a train to destination A. Travelling by
train will cost her $400 and will take 4 hours. Driving to destination A takes 6 hours, and the
required amount of gasoline costs $250. Her opportunity cost of time is $15 per hour.
24) Refer to the scenario above. What is the total cost involved if Maria chooses to travel by
train?
A) $60
B) $400
C) $420
D) $460
Answer: D
Difficulty: Medium
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: Cost-Benefit Analysis
17
25) Refer to the scenario above. If Maria borrows her parents' car and pays for only the gasoline,
what is her total cost of driving to destination A?
A) $90
B) $250
C) $300
D) $340
Answer: D
Difficulty: Medium
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: Cost-Benefit Analysis
27) Refer to the scenario above. If Maria's opportunity cost of time increases to $80 per hour, the
cost involved in taking the train is:
A) $320.
B) $720.
C) $800.
D) $970.
Answer: B
Difficulty: Medium
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: Cost-Benefit Analysis
28) Refer to the scenario above. If Maria's opportunity cost of time increases to $80 per hour, the
cost of driving to destination A is:
A) $480.
B) $730.
C) $800.
D) $970.
Answer: B
Difficulty: Medium
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: Cost-Benefit Analysis
18
29) Refer to the scenario above. If the opportunity cost of time increases to $80 per hour, which
of the following statements is true?
A) Maria should choose to drive as it saves her $10.
B) Maria should choose to drive as it saves her $150.
C) Maria should choose to travel by train as it saves her $10.
D) Maria should choose to travel by train as it saves her $150.
Answer: C
Difficulty: Medium
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: Cost-Benefit Analysis
32) Why do trade-offs occur? How are budget constraints related to trade-offs?
Answer: Trade-offs occur because of scarcity: economic agents need to satisfy their wants with
limited resources. Therefore, in most cases, some benefits have to be given up in order to gain
some other benefits. Budget constraints quantify the relevant trade-offs that an economic agent
faces. Once trade-offs are quantified, rational decision making becomes easier allowing the
individual to make an optimal decision.
Difficulty: Easy
Topic: Trade-offs and Budget Constraints
19
33) Define opportunity cost. A student who has just graduated from college has three job offers:
the first job pays him $35,000 a year, the second job pays him $23,000 a year, and the third one
pays him $15,000 a year. What is the student's opportunity cost of taking the first job?
Answer: Opportunity cost is the best alternative use of a resource. It is what an economic agent
is giving up when he chooses a particular option. If the individual decides to take the first job; he
will earn $35,000 a year. The opportunity cost of taking this job is the next best offer that he
could have taken up. Therefore, the opportunity cost of the first job is $23,000 a year.
Difficulty: Easy
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: Opportunity Cost
34) What is cost-benefit analysis? What are the steps involved in using cost-benefit analysis to
make the optimal choice?
Answer: Cost-benefit analysis is a calculation that adds up the costs and benefits of a particular
choice using a common unit of measurement. It involves the conversion of all costs and benefits
into a common unit of measurement so that they can be compared. The difference between the
benefits and costs of choosing an alternative is referred to as the net benefit of the alternative.
The alternative with the highest net benefit is the optimal choice.
Difficulty: Easy
Topic: Cost-Benefit Analysis
35) Kevin has a lot of free time and he decides to pick up a new hobby. He has two options—he
can take art classes or can sign up for French cooking classes. He estimates that the art classes
would cost him $70, and would provide him with a benefit of $100. On the other hand, the
cooking classes would cost him $120, but provide him benefits worth $160. Use cost-benefit
analysis to arrive at the optimum choice for Kevin.
Answer: Kevin's optimal choice would depend on the net benefits of both options.
Net benefit of taking up art classes = $100 - $70 = $30
Net benefit of taking up cooking classes = $160 - $120 = $40
Therefore, given the costs and benefits involved, Kevin should sign up for the French cooking
classes rather than the art classes.
Difficulty: Medium
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: Cost-Benefit Analysis
20
36) If Tom spends 4 hours a day on Facebook and the minimum wage in his country is $7 per
hour, what is his opportunity cost of spending time on Facebook? Given that spending time on
Facebook has an opportunity cost, does this analysis suggest that Tom should work rather than
spending his time on social networking?
Answer: Opportunity cost refers to the best alternative use of a resource. In this case, the
resource is time. So, if Tom decided to work instead of spending time on Facebook, he would
earn $7 every hour. Therefore, Tom's opportunity cost of spending time on Facebook is equal to
7 × 4 = $28.
No, economic analysis does not dictate choices. Economics would not tell Tom what to do; it
will only help him identify the trade-offs that he is making in his decisions. Whether Tom
chooses to work or spend time on Facebook is a normative choice that Tom should make based
on costs and benefits.
Difficulty: Medium
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: Evidence-Based Economics: Is Facebook Free?
37) A consumer has a monthly income of $100 that he wants to spend on two goods: rugs priced
at $10 and chairs priced at $5. What is the consumer's opportunity cost of buying a rug? What is
his opportunity cost of buying a chair? Use a table to represent the consumer's budget constraint.
Answer: Opportunity cost is the best alternative use of a resource. Buying one rug costs $10,
and each chair costs $5. So, one rug can be purchased with the same amount of money used to
buy two chairs. Therefore, the opportunity cost of buying a rug is 2 chairs. Similarly, the
opportunity cost of buying a chair is half a rug.
The consumer's budget constraint is given by:
$100 = 10 × (Quantity of rugs) + 5 × (Quantity of chairs)
The following table shows the various combinations of rugs and chairs that the consumer can
buy with $100.
21
38) a) Sam pays $600 for 30 days of guitar classes. He attends an hour-long class every day. If,
instead of attending class, he works at a part-time job, he would be paid $5 an hour. Or, he could
work at a fast-food outlet and earn $9 per hour. Once he has already paid a nonrefundable fee of
$600 to enroll in the class, what is his opportunity cost of attending each hour of class?
b) Suppose workers decide to work more and consume less leisure when their hourly wage rate
increases. What could explain this behavior?
Answer:
a) Sam's opportunity cost will measure the next best use of an hour of his time plus the hourly
cost of guitar classes. Once he pays the nonrefundable $600, there is no other cost other than the
value of his time. With an hour of time, he has two options: work for $5 per hour, or work for $9
per hour. Therefore, the next best use of an hour that Sam spends on guitar classes is equal to the
$9 he could have earned per hour by working at the fast-food outlet. Sam's opportunity cost of
attending his guitar classes is $9 per hour.
b) With an increase in their hourly wage rates, workers work more and consume less leisure due
to a change in their opportunity cost. Assuming that the initial wage of an employee is $10 per
hour, the opportunity cost of one hour of rest or leisure is $10 per hour. Now, if the wage rate
increases from $10 to $20 per hour, the opportunity cost of one hour of rest or leisure also
increases to $20 per hour. Therefore, taking an hour of rest becomes more expensive for
employees and they tend to work more than they used to.
Difficulty: Medium
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: Opportunity Cost
22
39) Wendy has to decide between taking a flight and driving to California. Air tickets cost $800
and will get her to California in 2 hours. If she decides to drive, she would need $300 worth of
gasoline and 10 hours to reach her destination. Suppose that Wendy's opportunity cost of time is
$20 per hour. Assuming that there are no other costs involved, use cost-benefit analysis to decide
whether she should fly or drive to California. If Wendy has an important business meeting to
attend and this increases her opportunity cost of time to $200 per hour, will her optimum
decision change? Explain.
Answer: Cost-benefit analysis is a calculation that adds up costs and benefits using a common
unit of measurement. It is used to identify the alternative that has the greatest net benefit, which
is equivalent to benefits minus costs.
If Wendy decides to drive down instead of flying, she saves ($800 - $300) = $500. But driving
down to California takes an additional 8 hours of travelling time.
Therefore, the net benefit of driving relative to flying = ($500 cost saving) - (8 hours of
additional travelling time) × ($20/hour) = $500 - $160 = $340.
Because the net benefit of driving is positive, driving to California is an optimum choice for
Wendy when the opportunity cost of time is $20 per hour.
If the opportunity cost of time changes, the net benefit of driving relative to flying will also
change.
Net benefit of driving relative to flying when the opportunity cost of time is $200 per hour =
($500 cost saving) - (8 hours of additional travelling time) × ($200/hour) = $500 - $1,600 = -
$1,100.
Because the net benefit of driving relative to flying is negative, flying to California is an
optimum choice for Wendy when the opportunity cost of time is $200 per hour.
Difficulty: Medium
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: Cost-Benefit Analysis
23
1.4 The Second Principle of Economics: Equilibrium
2) Which of the following will hold true if the market for cameras is in equilibrium at a price of
$40?
A) Sellers of cameras will have an incentive to charge a price higher than $40.
B) The quantity of cameras produced will equal the quantity of cameras bought in the market.
C) Buyers of cameras will want to buy fewer cameras than they are purchasing at equilibrium.
D) If the cost of producing cameras falls below $40 per camera, all sellers will stop supplying
cameras.
Answer: B
Difficulty: Medium
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: The Second Principle of Economics: Equilibrium
24
5) The term "free riders" refers to people who:
A) don't contribute but still benefit from others' actions.
B) make economic decisions randomly and are not rational.
C) selflessly pay for others' consumption of goods and services.
D) haggle over the prices of the goods and services that they buy.
Answer: A
Difficulty: Easy
Topic: The Free-Rider Problem
8) Each member in a group might do what's best for himself or herself instead of behaving in a
way that optimizes the well-being of the entire group. This gives rise to the problem of:
A) Pareto inefficiency.
B) free riding.
C) irrational behavior.
D) disequilibrium.
Answer: B
Difficulty: Easy
Topic: The Free-Rider Problem
11) When a market is in equilibrium, both buyers and sellers do not perceive a benefit from
changing their behavior. Why?
Answer: In most economic situations, an economic agent is not optimizing individually. His
decision is influenced by the decisions taken by other economic agents. In equilibrium, each and
every economic agent is doing the best that they can do, given the information they have and
given the actions of other economic agents. Therefore, nobody perceives a benefit from changing
his or her behavior.
Difficulty: Easy
Topic: The Second Principle of Economics: Equilibrium
12) Suppose the market for pizza slices is in equilibrium at a price of $1 per slice. What
conditions are likely to be satisfied in the pizza slice market?
Answer: The conditions that are satisfied when the market for pizza slices is in equilibrium are:
a) The number of pizza slices manufactured by sellers will equal the number of pizza slices
purchased by buyers.
b) Pizza sellers will produce pizzas at the point where the cost of production is less than or
equal to the market price of $1.
c) Buyers will consume pizza as long as the benefit that they derive from consumption is at
least equal to the market price of $1.
Difficulty: Medium
AACSB: Application of Knowledge
Topic: The Second Principle of Economics: Equilibrium
26
1.5 The Third Principle of Economics: Empiricism
27
6) What is the rationale behind empiricism in economic analysis?
Answer: Empiricism refers to the use of data to test theoretical ideas or concepts. Empiricism is
important as it enables economists to determine whether economic theories are consistent with
actual human behavior. This enables economists to refute faulty theories or modify them such
that they would better fit the real world. Empiricism also enables researchers to identify causal
relationships between sets of variables.
Difficulty: Easy
Topic: The Third Principle of Economics: Empiricism
28