Scribd
Upload
129 views1 page

Validation Sheet FPR Research Questionnaires

This document is a validation sheet for evaluating research questionnaires. It asks validators to rate various aspects of the questionnaire such as clarity, presentation, suitability, adequacy of content, and attainment of objectives. The ratings are on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being excellent and 1 being poor. The document also provides information about the title of the research questionnaire being evaluated, which is about the journey of senior high school students from single-parent households. It lists the names of the researchers and asks for the date of evaluation and any remarks from the validator.

Uploaded by

Jocelyn Mae Cabrera
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
129 views1 page

Validation Sheet FPR Research Questionnaires

This document is a validation sheet for evaluating research questionnaires. It asks validators to rate various aspects of the questionnaire such as clarity, presentation, suitability, adequacy of content, and attainment of objectives. The ratings are on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being excellent and 1 being poor. The document also provides information about the title of the research questionnaire being evaluated, which is about the journey of senior high school students from single-parent households. It lists the names of the researchers and asks for the date of evaluation and any remarks from the validator.

Uploaded by

Jocelyn Mae Cabrera
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

VALIDATION SHEET FOR RESEARCH

QUESTIONNAIRES

Name of Validator:
Degree:
Position:
No. of years in teaching:

Note of the evaluator: Kindly check the appropriate box for your ratings.
Scale: 5-Excellent 4-Very Good 3-Good 2-Fair 1-Poor
5 4 3 2 1
1.Clarity and Direction of items
The vocabulary level, language, structure, and conceptual
level of participants as well as the test directions and the items
are written in a clear and understandable manner.
2.Presentation and Direction of items
The items are presented and organized in logical manner.
3.Suitability of items
The items appropriately presented the substance of the
research. The questions are designed to determine the area
that must be answered.
4.Adequateness of the Content
The sub-questions per main research questions are
substantially agreeable in attaining the research objectives.
5.Attainment on Purpose
This instrument as a whole fulfills the objectives needed for
the research.
6. Objective
Each question seeks to callout the essence of the research
objectives, hence, bringing out the credibility and reliability of
the research participants’ answer.

Title of the Researcher Questionnaire: Unspoken Pleas: Unraveling the


Journey of Senior High School Students with Single-Parent Household
Name of the Researchers: Jacinth T. Dellosa, Hans Ezekiel R. Jancinal, Edwin
L. Ortillano Jr., Charmell Nicole M. Amar, Elexa O. Bacalto, Angeline C.
Carumayan, Marjorie A. Francisco, Ain M. Lucero, Cyra E. Pantaleon, Liana Esza
R. Toribio, Shaira Lyn G. Undalayan
Date of Evaluation of the Questionnaire:
Remarks of the Evaluator:

Signature above Printed Name

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy