Project Report Icsi - 1
Project Report Icsi - 1
Legal Provisions
on
Merger & Amalgamation
SUBMITTED TO
Signature:
2|Page
CONTENTS
Post Merger
3|Page
INTRODUCTION
The Companies Act, 2013 appears to be opening new and simple avenues for
mergers,acquisitions and restructuring operations in India. While the Act
retains the old provisions, italso adds robust and progressive new ones.
Changes made in it are likely to have a positiveimpact on the manner in which
corporate structuring is undertaken in India due to numerousprocedural
changes.
The 2013 Act seeks to simplify the overall process of acquisitions, mergers
andrestructuring, facilitate domestic and cross-border mergers and
acquisitions, and thereby,make Indian firms relatively more attractive to PE
investors. Some of the changes tolook for at the conceptual level include
merger/demerger processes, cross-border and fasttrack mergers between small
companies and holdings, subsidiaries and provisions relatingto minority
shareholders’ protection and exits.
The term amalgamation is not defined under the Companies Act, 2013. Thus
resort has to be taken to the following dictionary and other meanings of the
term amalgamation:
4|Page
As per general dictionary meaning: Amalgamation is to compound, to
consolidate or to combine two or more things.
5|Page
To put to use the liquidity available with the company for achieving
growth through diversification
To acquire and maximize the available managerial skills to increase the
profitability
To take advantage of the concession given by the tax laws
Elimination of Competition
As per the latest rules below mentioned will be process of Compromise and
arrangement.
2. Who can file the application for Compromise & Arrangement can
propose: Section230(1)
An application for Compromise & Arrangement can be file with Tribunal (NCLT)
byfollowings:
1. The Company or
2. Creditor or
3. Member of the Company, or
4. In the case of a company which is being wound up, of the Liquidator.
6|Page
Joint Application:Rule 3(2)
Where more than one company is involved in a scheme, such application may,
at thediscretion of such companies, be filed as a joint-application.
3. Format of Application
Application to the tribunal for Compromise & Arrangement will be submitted in
formNCLT-1 along with following documents: Rule 3(1)
7|Page
iv. where the company proposes to adopt the corporate debt restructuring
guidelinesspecified by the Reserve Bank of India, a statement to that effect; and
v. a valuation report in respect of the shares and the property and all assets,
tangible andintangible, movable and immovable, of the company by a
registered valuer.
f) The applicant shall also disclose to the Tribunal in the application, the basis
on which eachclass of members or creditors has been identified for the
purposes of approval of thescheme.
5. Notice of Meeting:
The Notice of the meeting pursuant to the order of tribunal to be givein Form
No. CAA-2.
8|Page
The notice shall be sent individually to each of theCreditors or Members and
the debenture-holders at the address registered with thecompany.
a. Details of the order of the Tribunal directing the calling, convening and
conducting of themeeting:-
Date of the Order;
Date, time and venue of the meeting.
9|Page
c. Relationship in case of Combined Application:
if the scheme of compromise orarrangement relates to more than one
company, then the fact and details of any relationshipsubsisting between such
companies who are parties to such scheme of compromise orarrangement,
including holding, subsidiary or of associate companies.
10 | P a g e
o Non-Promoter Members;
o Depositors;
o Creditors;
o Debenture holders;
o Deposit trustee and debenture trustee;
o Employees of the company:
11 | P a g e
The Notice of the meeting shall be advertisedin form No. CAA-2 at least in one
English Newspaper and in at least one vernacular language newspaper. It shall
indicate the time within which copies of the compromise orarrangement shall
be made available to the concerned persons free of charge from theregistered
office of the company
Notice shall be sent to the office of the authority after sending of notice to
members orcreditors of the Company by Registered post, or by Speed post, or
by courier, or by handdelivery.
Representation by authority:
The authority desire to make any representation then shall sent to the
tribunal within a periodof 30 days from the date of receipt of such notice.
Copy of such representation shall simultaneously be sent to the
concerned companies
In case of no representation within the 30 days then presumed that
authority doesn’t haveany representation.
8. Voting:
12 | P a g e
The persons to whom the notice is sent may vote in the meeting either
themselves or through proxies or by postal ballot to the adoption of the
compromise orarrangement within one month from the date of receipt of such
notice. Section 230(4) Rule 9
The report of the result of the meeting shall be in Form No. CAA.4 and shall
state accurately
The number of creditors or class of creditors or
The number of members or class of members, as the case may be,
o who were present and
13 | P a g e
o who voted at the meeting either in person or by proxy, and
o Where applicable, who voted through electronic means, their
individual values and the waythey voted.
The same shall be binding on the company, all the creditors, or class of
creditors ormembers or class of members, as the case may be, or, in case of a
company being woundup, on the liquidator and the contributories of the
company.
After completion of the Voting and report of result of the meeting by the
chairman to thetribunal next step will be confirmation of C&A form the
Tribunal (NCLT).
Right of Creditor to file the petition: Where the company fails to present the
petition forconfirmation of the compromise or arrangement as aforesaid, it shall
be open to any creditoror member as the case may be, with the leave of the
Tribunal, to present the petition and thecompany shall be liable for the cost
thereof.
14 | P a g e
VII. Notice of Hearing by Tribunal Rule 16;
The Tribunal shall fix a date for the hearing of thepetition.
Legal Responsibility of the Tribunal: The notice of the hearing of the petition
shall also beserved by the Tribunal ;
To the Objectors or
To Their Representatives under sub-section (4) of section 230 of the Act
and
To the Central Government and
Other Authorities who have made representation under rule 8 and have
desired to be heardin their representation.
Power of Tribunal
If the Tribunal is satisfied that the compromise or arrangement sanctioned
under section 230cannot be implemented satisfactorily with or without
modifications, and the company isunable to pay its debts as per the scheme, it
may make an order for winding up the companyand such an order shall be
deemed to be an order made under section 273.
Sub-section (1):
Tribunal’s power tocall meeting of creditors or members, with respect to
merger or amalgamation of companies.
Where an application is made to the Tribunal under section 230 for the
sanctioning of a compromise or an arrangement proposed between a company
and any such persons as are mentioned in that section, and it is shown to the
Tribunal—
(a) that the compromise or arrangement has been proposed for the purposes of,
or in connection with, a scheme for the reconstruction of the company or
companies involving merger or the amalgamation of any two or more
companies; and
(b) that under the scheme, the whole or any part of the undertaking, property
or liabilities of any company (hereinafter referred to as the transferor company)
is required to be transferred to another company (hereinafter referred to as the
transferee company), or is proposed to be divided among and transferred to two
or more companies,
the Tribunal may on such application, order a meeting of the creditors or class
of creditors or the members or class of members, as the case may be, to be
called, held and conducted in such manner as the Tribunal may direct and the
provisions of sub-sections (3) to (6) of section 230 shall apply mutatis
mutandis.
Sub-section (2)
Circulation of documents for members/creditors meeting.
Where an order has been made by the Tribunal under sub-section (1), merging
companies or the companies in respect of which a division is proposed, shall
also be required to circulate the following for the meeting so ordered by the
Tribunal, namely:
(a) the draft of the proposed terms of the scheme drawn up and adopted by the
directors of the merging company;
16 | P a g e
(b) confirmation that a copy of the draft scheme has been filed with the
Registrar;
(c) a report adopted by the directors of the merging companies explaining effect
of compromise on each class of shareholders, key managerial personnel,
promoters and non-promoter shareholders laying out in particular the share
exchange ratio, specifying any special valuation difficulties;
Sub-section (3):
Sanctioning of scheme by tribunal
The Tribunal, after satisfying itself that the procedure specified in sub-sections
(1) and (2) has been complied with, may, by order, sanction the compromise or
arrangement or by a subsequent order, make provision for the following
matters, namely:—
(a) the transfer to the transferee company of the whole or any part of the
undertaking, property or liabilities of the transferor company from a date to be
determined by the parties unless the Tribunal, for reasons to be recorded by it
in writing, decides otherwise;
17 | P a g e
(d) dissolution, without winding-up, of any transferor company;
(e) the provision to be made for any persons who, within such time and in such
manner as the Tribunal directs, dissent from the compromise or arrangement;
(f) where share capital is held by any non-resident shareholder under the
foreign direct investment norms or guidelines specified by the Central
Government or in accordance with any law for the time being in force, the
allotment of shares of the transferee company to such shareholder shall be in
the manner specified in the order;
(g) the transfer of the employees of the transferor company to the transferee
company;
(h) where the transferor company is a listed company and the transferee
company is an unlisted company,—
(A) the transferee company shall remain an unlisted company until it becomes
a listed company;
(B) if shareholders of the transferor company decide to opt out of the transferee
company, provision shall be made for payment of the value of shares held by
them and other benefits in accordance with a pre-determined price formula or
after a valuation is made, and the arrangements under this provision may be
made by the Tribunal:
Provided that the amount of payment or valuation under this clause for any
share shall not be less than what has been specified by the Securities and
Exchange Board under any regulations framed by it;
(i) where the transferor company is dissolved, the fee, if any, paid by the
transferor company on its authorised capital shall be set-off against any fees
payable by the transferee company on its authorised capital subsequent to the
amalgamation; and
18 | P a g e
Provided that no compromise or arrangement shall be sanctioned by the
Tribunal unless a certificate by the company’s auditor has been filed with the
Tribunal to the effect that the accounting treatment, if any, proposed in
thescheme of compromise or arrangement is in conformity with the accounting
standards prescribed under section 133.
Sub-section (4)
Transfer of property or liabilities
Where an order under this section provides for the transfer of any property or
liabilities, then, by virtue of the order, that property shall be transferred to the
transferee company and the liabilities shall be transferred to and become the
liabilities of the transferee company and any property may, if the order so
directs, be freed from any charge which shall by virtue of the compromise or
arrangement, cease to have effect.
Sub-section (5):
Certified copy of the order to be filed with the registrar
Every company in relation to which the order is made shall cause a certified
copy of the order to be filed with the Registrar for registration within thirty days
of the receipt of certified copy of the order.
Sub-section (7):
Annual statement certified by CA/CS/CWA to be filed with registrar
everyyear until the completion of the scheme.
Every company in relation to which the order is made shall, until the
completion of the scheme, file a statement in such form and within such time
as may be prescribed with the Registrar every year duly certified by a chartered
accountant or a cost accountant or a company secretary in practice indicating
whether the scheme is being complied with in accordance with the orders of
the Tribunal or not.
19 | P a g e
Sub-section (8):
Punishment
If a company fails to comply with sub-section (5), the company and every officer
of the company who is in default shall be liable to a penalty of twenty thousand
rupees, and where the failure is a continuing one, with a further penalty of one
thousand rupees for each day after the first during which such failure
continues, subject to a maximum of three lakh rupees.]
(iii) a scheme involves a division, where under the scheme the undertaking,
property and liabilities of the company in respect of which the compromise or
arrangement is proposed are to be divided among and transferred to two or
more companies each of which is either an existing company or a new
company; and
(iv) property includes assets, rights and interests of every description and
liabilities include debts and obligations of every description.
Exception\Modification\Adaptation
1.In case of Government Company - In section 232 for the word "Tribunal" the
words "Central Government" shall be substituted.
20 | P a g e
Section 237: Power of Central Government to provide for
amalgamation of companies in publicinterest
Sub-section (1):
Power of Central Government to provide for amalgamation ofCompanies
Where the Central Government is satisfied that it is essential in the public
interest that two or more companies should amalgamate, the Central
Government may, by order notified in the Official Gazette, provide for the
amalgamation of those companies into a single company with such
constitution, with such property, powers, rights, interests, authorities and
privileges, and with such liabilities, duties and obligations, as may be specified
in the order.
Sub-section (2):
Continuation of legal proceedings.
The order under sub-section (1) may also provide for the continuation by or
against the transferee company of any legal proceedings pending by or against
any transferor company and such consequential, incidental and supplemental
provisions as may, in the opinion of the Central Government, be necessary to
give effect to the amalgamation.
Sub-section (3):
Interest or rights of members, creditors, debenture holders not to be
affected.
Every member or creditor, including a debenture holder, of each of the
transferor companies before the amalgamation shall have, as nearly as may be,
the same interest in or rights against the transferee company as he had in the
company of which he was originally a member or creditor, and in case the
interest or rights of such member or creditor in or against the transferee
company are less than his interest in or rights against the original company, he
shall be entitled to compensation to that extent, which shall be assessed by
such authority as may be prescribed and every such assessment shall be
published in the Official Gazette, and the compensation so assessed shall be
paid to the member or creditor concerned by the transferee company.
Sub-section (4):
Appeal to tribunal
Any person aggrieved by any assessment of compensation made by the
prescribed authority under sub-section (3) may, within a period of thirty days
21 | P a g e
from the date of publication of such assessment in the Official Gazette, prefer
an appeal to the Tribunal and thereupon the assessment of the compensation
shall be made by the Tribunal.
Sub-section (5):
Conditions for order
No order shall be made under this section unless—
(a) a copy of the proposed order has been sent in draft to each of the companies
concerned;
(b) the time for preferring an appeal under sub-section (4) has expired, or
where any such appeal has been preferred, the appeal has been finally
disposed off; and
(c) the Central Government has considered, and made such modifications, if
any, in the draft order as it may deem fit in the light of suggestions and
objections which may be received by it from any such company within such
period as the Central Government may fix in that behalf, not being less than
two months from the date on which the copy aforesaid is received by that
company, or from any class of shareholders therein, or from any creditors or
any class of creditors thereof.
Sub-section 6:
The copies of every order made under this section shall, as soon as may be
after it has been made, be laid before each House of Parliament.
Fast Track Merger (FTM) is a new concept introduced under the Companies
Act, 2013. It isunique concept because High Court approval is not required in
this Merger, only RegionalDirectors (Powers of Central Government delegated to
Regional Director vide NotificationNo. S.O. 4090(E) dated 19th December,
2016), Registrar of Companies and OfficialLiquidator are the authorities whose
approval is required.
22 | P a g e
This mechanism offers the following benefits to the merger process among
various others:
2. Call the Board Meeting and Prepare the Draft Scheme of Amalgamation or
Merger.
23 | P a g e
b) Authorized any director or Company Secretary or any other person to
dosuch acts in this regard.
c) Prepare the Statement of Assets and Liabilities of the Companies
whichreveals the current position of the Companies and receive the
Auditor’sReport on the Statement.
24 | P a g e
7. After getting objections or suggestions call a Board meeting and amend the
DraftScheme and consider the Day, Date, Time and Place for General Meeting
andCreditors Meeting. If no such objections or suggestion received, then get the
schemeapproved without alteration and do the further proceeding for the
Meeting ofMembers and Creditors.
8. Send the notice of the meeting to the members and creditors shall be
accompaniedby-
a) a statement, as far as applicable, referred to in sub-section (3) of section
230of the Act read with sub-rule (3) of rule 6 hereof;
b)the declaration of solvency filed inForm CAA-10
c)a copy of the scheme.
9. Conduct General Meeting and get the scheme approved by the respective
membersor class of members at a general meeting holding at least 90 per cent
of the totalnumber of shares.
(Note: The meeting should be conducted after 30 days of thesending Notice in
CAA-9, so that the objections or suggestions shall be considered).
10. Conduct Creditors Meeting by giving a notice of 21 days along with the
aboveattachments (point no. 6) and get the scheme approved by majority
representing ninetenths in value of the creditors or class of creditors of
respective companies orotherwise approved in writing.
11. The Transferee company shall, within seven days after the conclusion of
the meetingof members or class of members or creditors or class of creditors,
file a copy of thescheme as agreed to by the members and creditors, along with
a report of the resultof each of the meetings in Form No. CAA.11 with the
following:
25 | P a g e
12. The objections or suggestions shall be given by ROC and OL to the RD
within 30days of the filing the Form CAA-11.
14. Where objections or suggestions are received from the ROC and OL and
theRegional Directors is of the opinion, whether on the basis of such objections
orsuggestions or otherwise, that such a scheme is not in public interest or in
theinterest of the creditors, it may file an application before the Tribunal in
form CAA-13within a period of 60 days of the receipt of the scheme stating its
objections oropinion and requesting that the Tribunal may consider the scheme
under section 232of the Companies Act, 2013.
16. The confirmation order of the scheme issued by the Regional Directors or
Tribunalshall be filed, within 30 days of the receipt of the order of confirmation,
in Form INC-28 along with the fees as provided under Companies (Registration
Offices and Fees)Rules, 2014 with the Registrar of Companies having
jurisdiction over the transfereeand transferor companies respectively.
26 | P a g e
232 of the Companies Act, 2013, including where the condition prescribed in
clause (d) of subsection(1) of section 233 of the Act has not been met.
The skeptic situation of the dominance of majority rule and at the same time
protecting therights and interest of the minority has always been the area of
controversy and discord. It isimperative for the statute to ensure that the
powers of the majority are within reasonablebounds, hence not resulting in
oppression of the minority. But the practical implication ofprotecting minority
interests while taking strategic business decisions often create obstacleswhich
lead to prolonged legal battle.
Prevalent practices for squeezing out of the minority shareholding from entity
companyaround the globe has generally been:
1. Takeovers;
2. Arrangements;
3. Mergers;
5. Capital Reduction.
‘Minority shareholding’ has not been specifically defined under the Act,
however, section 236of the Act uses the word Minority shareholding in respect
of registered holders of the issuedequity shares of the company not exceeding
ten percent.
27 | P a g e
Squeezing out minority equity shareholders- The Indian
perspective
Section 236 of the Act provides for the purchase of minority shareholding by
the majorityshareholders in accordance with the provisions of the section read
with the Companies(Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Rules,
2016 (‘CAA Rules, 2016’).
The acquirer entity or any person acting in concert with such acquirer can
become a majorityshareholder to the extent of at least 90% of the issued equity
share capital by way of:
(i) anamalgamation,
maynotify the company of their intention to buy the remaining equity shares.
The aforesaidprovision has been kept open ended for the majority shareholders
to increase their stake to90% in the transfer company. Besides the options of
amalgamation, share exchange, etc theacquirer can undertake any other
possible mode to increase its stake to a minimum of 90%for going ahead with
the exercise of acquiring minority shareholding.
Section 236(2) of the Act provides for a pre-determined exit price to be offered
to theminority shareholders to be calculated by a registered valuer in
accordance with Rule 27 ofthe CAA Rules, 2016 which provides for evaluation
criteria for listed companies as well asunlisted companies. To proceed with the
purchase of minority shareholding, the majorityshareholders are required to
deposit an amount equal to the value of shares to be acquiredby them of the
minority shareholders in a separate bank account which shall be operated
bythe transferor company for atleast one year for payment to the minority
shareholders,however, such amount shall be disbursed to the entitled
shareholders within sixty days;
28 | P a g e
Such disbursement shall continue to be made to the entitled shareholders for a
period of oneyear, where the entitled minority shareholders have failed to
receive or claim paymentarising out of such disbursement
In case the minority shareholders whose shares are intended to be bought fail
to tender theirshares within the specified time period decided by the transferor
company, such shares shallbe taken as cancelled and the transferor company
shall be authorized to issue shares in lieuof the cancelled shares and complete
the transfer by following the applicable transferprovision and dispatching the
amount paid by the acquirer in advance.
When the majority shareholder fails to acquire full purchase of the shares of
the minorityequity shareholders, due to reasons of non-traceability or death of
the shareholders, theprovisions of this section will still apply to make an offer
for sale of minority equityshareholding for a period of three years from the date
of majority acquisition or majorityshareholding
Section 236 (8) of the Act provides for a typical negotiation deal between the
acquirer andthe minority shareholders. This provision allows the majority
shareholders to share theadditional compensation paid by them for reaching
from a stake of 75% to a stake of 90% inthe transferor company with the
minority shareholders. This seems to be a protectiveprovision for the minority
shareholders.
29 | P a g e
(a) the shares of the company of the residual minority equity shareholder had
been delisted;and
(b) the period of one year or the period specified in the regulations made by the
Securitiesand Exchange Board under the Securities and Exchange Board of
India Act, 1992, hadelapsed.
30 | P a g e
4. The transferee company shall file an application with the Registrar along
with the schemeregistered, indicating the revised authorised capital and pay
the prescribed fees due onrevised capital:
Provided that the fee, if any, paid by the transferor company on itsauthorised
capital prior to its merger or amalgamation with the transferee company
shallbe set-off against the fees payable by the transferee company on its
authorised capitalenhanced by the merger or amalgamation.
31 | P a g e
amalgamated company onlywhen all the conditions, mentioned in the said
section, are satisfied.
‘Amalgamating company’ means company which is merging and ‘amalgamated
company’means the company with which it merges or the company which is
formed after merger.
However, acquisition of property of one company by another is not
‘amalgamation’.
32 | P a g e
from tax assuch transactions will not be regarded as a transfer for capital gain
purpose, if:
Note 2: Specified bank means the State Bank of India constituted under the
StateBank of India Act, 1955 or a subsidiary bank as defined in the State Bank
of India(Subsidiary Bank) Act, 1959 or a corresponding new bank constituted
under section 3of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of
Undertaking) Act, 1970 orunder section 3 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition
and Transfer of Undertaking)Act, 1980.]
33 | P a g e
ii. The amalgamated company should be an Indian Company.
34 | P a g e
Amortization of expenditure in case of Amalgamation [Sec. 35DD]:
Under Sec 35DD for expenditure incurred in connection with the amalgamation
theassessee shall be allowed a deduction of an amount equal to one-fifth of
suchexpenditure for each of the five successive previous years beginning with
theprevious year in which the amalgamation takes place.
35 | P a g e
Availability of MAT credit post Merger:
All the assets and liabilities of the Transferor companies become properties
ofthe Transferee Company pursuant to merger . As MAT credit forms part of
theassets of the transferor Company and thus the same should get
transferred tothe Transferee Company.
The Act does not specifically provide that the MAT credit should
betransferred on Amalgamation and the literal reading of the MAT
provisionssuggest that MAT credit to be availed off by the persons who paid
MAT.
ACCOUNTING ASPECTS
Accounting Standard (AS)-14 recognizes two types of amalgamation:
(i) All the assets and liabilities of the transferor company become, after
amalgamation, the assets and liabilities of the transferee company.
(ii) Shareholders holding not less than 90% of the face value of the equity
shares of the transferor company (other than the equity shares already held
therein, immediately before the amalgamation, by the transferee company or
its subsidiaries or their nominees) become equity shareholders of the
transferee company by virtue of the amalgamation.
(iv) The business of the transferor company is intended to be carried on, after
the amalgamation, by the transferee company.
36 | P a g e
(v) No adjustment is intended to be made to the book values of the assets and
liabilities of the transferor company when they are incorporated in the
financial statements of the transferee company except to ensure uniformity
of accounting policies.
Consideration
The consideration for amalgamation means the aggregate of the shares and
other securities issued and the payment made in the form of cash or other
assets by the transferee company to the shareholders of the transferor
company. In determining the value of the consideration, assessment is made of
the fair value of its various elements.
The consideration for the amalgamation should include any non-cash element
at fair value. The fair value may be determined by a number of methods.
For example, in case of issue of securities, the value fixed by the statutory
authorities may be taken to be the fair value. In case of other assets, the fair
value may be determined by reference to the market value of the assets given
up, and where the market value of the assets given up cannot be reliably
assessed, such assets may be valued at their respective net book values. While
the scheme of amalgamation provides for an adjustment to the consideration
contingent on one or more future events, the amount of the additional payment
should be included in the consideration if payment is probable and a
reasonable estimate of the amount can be made. In all other cases, the
adjustment should be recognised as soon as the amount is determinable.
37 | P a g e
Treatment of Reserves on Amalgamation
If the amalgamation is an ‘amalgamation in the nature of merger’
The difference between the amountrecorded as share capital issued (plus any
additional consideration in the form of cash orother assets) and the amount of
share capital of the transferor company is adjusted inreserves in the financial
statements of the transferee company.
38 | P a g e
transferor company acquired by thetransferee company. If the result of the
computation is negative, the difference is debitedto goodwill arising on
amalgamation and if the result of the computation is positive, thedifference is
credited to Capital Reserve.
Disclosure Requirements
(i) description and number of shares issued, together with the percentage of
eachcompany’s equity shares exchanged to effect the amalgamation;
(ii) the amount of any difference between the consideration and the value of
netidentifiable assets acquired, and the treatment thereof.
(ii) the amount of any difference between the consideration and the value of
netidentifiable assets required, and the treatment thereof including the
period ofamortization of any goodwill arising on amalgamation.
While an amalgamation is effected after the balance sheet date but before the
issuanceof the financial statements of either party to the amalgamation,
disclosure should bemade as per the provisions of AS-4, ‘Contingencies and
Events Occurring after theBalance Sheet Date’, but the amalgamation should
39 | P a g e
not be incorporated in that financialstatements. In certain circumstances, the
amalgamation may also provide additionalinformation affecting the financial
statements themselves, for instance, by allowing thegoing concern assumption
to be maintained.
Due Diligence:
The most important process among all. Each company scrutinizes the
othercompany before merger & amalgamation (or takeover). This scrutiny runs
on variousgrounds, from financial to legal and the outcome of this diligence
can affect the ultimate priceand valuation of the merger. The CS is usually
routed in for conducting the legal duediligence, which may include checking
historical data to find shortcomings in compliance,missteps in governance,
mismanagement, while additionally identifying risks (external andinternal) that
may arise due to these factors.
Valuation:
In tandem with the earlier point, the CS can be roped to quantify such risks
asthey negatively affect the deal price.
Literature:
The CS is usually the one (besides expertise from law firms) who draft the
offerdocument.
Deal Structuring:
This process might include different actions that have to be executedtimely. For
instance, incorporation of a new company for the amalgamated entity,
dissolvingthe old company, executing the share transfer, etc.
40 | P a g e
Many CS skip the point that the success of a merger is not in itsexecution but
in the strategy followed after the merger. The human resource management
ofboth companies, the internal policies and controls that have to be revamped,
businessnetwork that is to be recast, and on a whole the actual merger of the
business activity andother processes. The CS is aptly trained to handle and
structure such activities andstrategies.
Further to the above, the Merger process can be divided into 3 stages:
Pre-merger
Merger process
Post-merger
Pre-Merger:
The CS is usually routed in for conducting the legal due diligence, which
may include checking historical data to find shortcomings in compliance
Missteps in governance, mismanagement
Identifying risks (external and internal) that may arise
Examining and reporting whether the adequate systems and processes are
in place
Ensuring all the statutory and regulatory laws are complied with.
Ensuring all forms, returns and applications are filed with ROC
Finding out any litigation pending in court, Contracts and agreements
entered into bythe company with third party.
Preparation of DD report. (observations and remarks of the DD)
During Merger:
41 | P a g e
Notice of meeting to creditors/members in form No. CAA.2 atleast 1 month
before theday of meeting
Report the results of the meeting to tribunal in form No. CAA.4.
On confirmation of the scheme by the majority of members/creditors
representing3/4th of the value of the total number of creditors/members
present and vote at themeeting and by those voted by electronic means, the
company shall pray before theTribunal for sanction of the scheme of
compromise or arrangements in Form CAA.5within 7 days of the filing of
report by the Chairperson.
Call Board meeting for adopting merger order and Call an Extra Ordinary
GeneralMeeting and inform details about merger like allotment of shares,
change in objectclause.
Post-Merger:
CONCLUSION
42 | P a g e
As Dale Carnegie said “Flaming enthusiasm, backed by horse sense and
persistence, is the quality that most frequently makes for success”.
There is little to stop Indian companies that desire to be global names for
playing the merger and amalgamation game globally. With a plethora of
financing options, this aspiration has become a reality for many corporate
houses, who can now boast of having the best in the industry under their
wings. Indian companies have often surpassed their foreign counterparts in
corporate restructuring both within and beyond the national frontiers. Mergers
and acquisitions are powerful indicators of a robust and growing economy. The
legal framework for such corporate restructuring must be easy and facilitative
and not restrictive and mired in bureaucratic and regulatory hurdles. The
biggest obstacle in the way of completing a merger or an amalgamation
remains the often long drawn out court procedure required for the sanction of a
scheme of arrangement. The recommendations of the JJ Irani Report are of
particular significance in this regard. The Report has recommended that legal
recognition to ‘contractual merger’ (i.e., mergers without the intervention of the
court) can go a long way in eliminating the obstructions to mergers in India.
The report also recommended that the right to object to a scheme of merger/
acquisition should only be available to persons holding a substantial stake in
the company.
As George Bernard Shaw is reputed to have said “We are made wise not by the
recollection of our past, but by the responsibility for our future”, and the future of
India is bright indeed.
43 | P a g e