Atr Documents May 24 2017

ATR-600 Series
The Latest Generation Turboprop
AIRBUS FUEL EFFICIENCY

SEMINAR
Toulouse, 17th May 2017

I. ATR Fundamentals
II. Fuel Savings Initiatives
III. State-of-the-art Avionics Ready For Future

Navigation Standards
IV. Data Mining & Analysis project
V. Weight Reduction Opportunities
VI. Feedbacks
I. ATR Fundamentals

VI. Feedbacks
CONTINOUS IMPROVEMENT
From 1st Generation to -600 Series
ATR 42-300 ATR 42-320 ATR 42-500 ATR 42-600

PW120 PW121 PW127E/M PW127M
1985 1987 1995 2012
Latest developments
Glass Cockpit, • High density configuration (78 seats)
6 Blade Propeller,
« Hot &«High
Hot»& High » New Avionics • Cargo Flex solution (full pax to cargo/pax)
Engine, Acoustic
Performance
PerformanceTreatment, Cabin Suite, Engine, • Smart Galley
Cabin • RNP AR 0.3/0.3
• EFVS (Enhanced Flight Vision System)
1989 1992 1997 2011
ATR 72-200 ATR 72-210 ATR 72-500 ATR 72-600

PW124B PW127 PW127F/M PW127M
PAGE 4
© ATR. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY DOCUMENT.
WHAT MAKES OUR SUCCESS?
Unbeatable
The lowest seat mile fuel burn
cost of its category
High
dispatch reliability
Unrivalled
airfield accessibility
ATR backbone continuous product development
Same type rating ATR 42 / 72

Strong Same cockpit, engines, propellers
commonality ~85% common spare parts
PAGE 5
UNMATCHED FUEL CONSUMPTION
Fuel burn (kg)

2,000 +65%
ATR 42-600
ATR 72-600
1,800
Direct TP competitor +78%
+34%
1,600 Similar size RJ
1,400
+37%
+86% Ref.
1,200
-10%
+44%
1,000 Ref.
-10%
+92%
800 Ref.
+47% -8%
600
Ref.
-7%
400
200
0
100Nm 200Nm 300Nm 400Nm Flight sector
« When the carrier looked at the fuel burn difference of the ATR 72 and Q400, it wasn’t even close »
David Neelman – CEO Azul
ATRs’ fuel consumption is by far the most efficient in the regional market.
Assumptions: No wind, SL, ISA, 10min taxi, std alternate 100Nm, fuel PAGE 6
reserves: +5% trip fuel & 30mins holding @ 1,500ft, perfo @ max payload. © ATR. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY DOCUMENT.
LESS CONSUMPTION, LESS CO2 EMISSIONS
Relative percentage of CO2 emissions / seat
70 Seaters 90 Seaters 100 Seaters

70%
20%
Datum
2,000 tonnes less emissions / year with an ATR vs. TP competitor

4,000 tonnes less emissions / year with an ATR vs. similar size RJ.
Sector length: 300Nm PAGE 7
2,000 flights / year © ATR. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY DOCUMENT.
A QUIET AIRCRAFT
Effective Perceived Noise in decibel
275
ICAO Chapter 4 limit – 2006

(271EPNdb)
270
ICAO Chapter 14 limit – 2017/2020

265
EPNdB
(264EPNdb)
260
- 9dB
255
250
ATR Direct TP Similar size RJ
competitor
ATRs have a low level of external noise with -13dB vs. a modern regional jet.
PAGE 8
ISO 14001 CERTIFICATION
ON ENTIRE PRODUCTS LIFE CYCLE
PAGE 9
BIOFUEL FLIGHT INITIATIVE
 BRA biofuel flight

• On February 1st 2017, an ATR 72-600 of the Swedish carrier BRA flew
from Stockholm-Bromma to Umeå with a blend of conventional fuel
and biofuel.
• The aircraft was fuelled at a high rate of biofuel: 45% used cooking oil.
• On this occasion, CEO C. Scherer stood with BRA CEO to support the
development of a local biofuel industry.
 Biohub project with Airbus & Total

• A regional initiative, the “biohub” project involves local industrial players, incl. ATR, Airbus
and Toulouse Airport.
• It aims at fostering the emergence of a local biofuel industry.
• In the deployment phase, Toulouse-Blagnac Airport will provide a rate of biofuel directly into its
standard fuel pumps.
• ATR is committed to use a blend of biofuel for its internal operations (flight test campaigns).
• The deployment of the project should start by Q3 2017.
PAGE 10
I. ATR Fundamentals

VI. Feedbacks
OPERATORS’ SUPPORT
 On-line support: very few questions received from operators on fuel-efficiency

related topics
• < 0.5% of overall questions
• Areas of interest: Long Range Cruise (LRC) operations, FOS module 5, engine-out taxi,
alternative CG, etc.
 Fuel Saving brochure

• Last update 2014
• Review planned for 2018
 Guidelines for fuel efficient operations

• Flight preparation, flight management & maintenance
PAGE 12
Preparation FLIGHT PREPARATION & MANAGEMENT
Cruise Performance
Monitoring CG Fuel
> Not significative > K* = 1.018
Flight planning *: Transport coefficient, 72-212A,
Max Cruise, 300 NM trip
As a basic…
> “Direct to”
Cruise > Long Range Cruise Alternate
> Vertical path

Management
management
Climb Descent > Continuous
descent
Taxi out Taxi in
> Engine-out taxi: Not recommended > Engine-out taxi: Airline policy
> Beware of engine cool down time
PAGE 13
FLIGHT OPERATIONS SOFTWARE (FOS)
 ATR Performance Software for engineering purposes

 Computation for each flight phases
 85 customers
Module 1 – Takeoff and landing charts
Module 2 – In-flight performance for climb, cruise, descent
Module 3 – Operational flight plan
Module 4 – Decision point for driftdown limitations
Module 5 – Cruise Performance Monitoring
PAGE 14
LONG RANGE CRUISE
 Long Range Cruise as an  Flight preparation

alternative to Max Cruise • Long Range Cruise tables (TQ/FF) to be
computed - FOS module 2 / service
1000 • OFP computed in LRC (minimum time)
Max cruise - 5% fuel
900
Long Range
ATR 72-212A - Trip fuel* (kgs)
800 Cruise - 45 kgs

+ 6 min.
700
600
- 3% fuel
500
- 12 kgs
400 + 1 min.  Flight management
300 • -500/-600: manual power setting
• -600 FMS gives objective torque
200
• Fuel Flow management
100 • FCOM Climb / Cruise, Reduced power setting
in cruise
0
FL 180 / 150 FL 180 / 300
• NOT ALLOWED in icing conditions
NM NM • NOT ALLOWED in case of engine failure
PAGE 15
CRUISE PERFORMANCE MONITORING
 The Cruise Performance Monitoring module (CPM) allows to compare actual

twin-engine performance parameters measured during a stabilised cruise to
the theoretical performance parameters
MPC recording
CPM
Manual recording Manual entry
FOS module 5 output => Fuel flow

variation for a given
MSN
Operational Flight
Plan

I. ATR Fundamentals

VI. Feedbacks
MODERN THALES GLASS COCKPIT
 State-of-the-art avionics
• 5 large LCD displays
• Intuitive systems monitoring
• Improved airports accessibility
 Efficient operations
• Pilots workload reduction
• Better situational awareness
• Smart electronic check-list management
• Fuel-efficient continuous descent approach
 Modular & flexible architecture

• Easy software updates
ATR is ready for future navigation standards

PAGE 18
COMPLIANT WITH APV STANDARDS
 APproaches with Vertical guidance (APV)

• APV- Baro / VNAV based on barometric data ICAO recommends
publication of APV procedures for
• APV SBAS / LPV based on augmented satellite data instruments airports worldwide
• Relevant for regions covered with SBAS signals
(WAAS, EGNOS, GAGAN, etc.)
APV brings safe and optimised vertical profile

• continuous vertical profile = fuel-efficient approach without step-down
APV improves regional airport operations

MINIMAS
• no ground installations required but minimas equivalent to CAT I
APV Baro: down to 250ft
APV SBAS: down to 200ft
ATR, designed for optimised approach

PAGE 19
STUDY CASE: LPV GAINS
 Le Touquet airport (LFAT)

• Regional airport with only one ILS on RWY 13 only: CAT I 250 ft
• Close to Channel, difficult weather
• To land on RWY31, follow RWY13 procedure, and circle before landing
 LPV procedure for upgraded operations

VPT 31  Shorter distance
LPV 31  Gain in flight time and fuel burn
VPT 31 LPV 31 Gain
Length 38.3 Nm 30.1 Nm - 8 Nm
Flight time 12 min 10 min - 2 min
Fuel burn 136 kg 106 kg - 30 kg
Minimas 550 ft 550 ft -
$ 60,000 annual savings on fuel per aircraft

PAGE 20
Assumptions: 2,000 flights / year, 3 US$ / Gal © ATR. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY DOCUMENT.
COMPLIANT WITH RNP-AR STANDARDS
 RNP-AR 0.3 APCH allows reduced lateral margins and curved legs
RNP-AR improves accessibility to most challenging airports

• with heavy terrain or traffic constraints
RNP-AR enables efficient flight tracks

• environmental constraints avoided, and distances shortened
Minimas: down to 250ft
 RNP-AR 0.3 / 0.3 under development

EIS target  Q1 2018
RNP-AR further extends airport accessibility

PAGE 21
STUDY CASE: RNP-AR GAINS
 Cusco airport (SPZO)

• 2nd biggest Peruvian airport, gateway to Machu Picchu
• 11,000 ft elevation, terrain-challenging airport
• Only non-precision approach → many cancellations & delays due to weather
 RNP-AR 0.3 procedure for upgraded operations

 Shorter distance
 Gain in flight time and fuel burn
 Lower minimas
VOR/DME
RNP-AR 28 Gain
Circling 28
Length 115 Nm 91.4 Nm - 24 Nm
Flight time 27 min 22 min - 5 min
Fuel burn 258 kg 195 kg - 63 kg
Minimas 3,500 ft 800 ft - 2700 ft
$ 130,000 annual savings on fuel per aircraft

PAGE 22
Assumptions: 2,000 flights / year, 3 US$ / Gal © ATR. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY DOCUMENT.
ATR SUPPORT IN INDONESIA FOR PBN
 More than 70 VFR-only airports in Indonesia currently operated with ATR aircraft
 Operators use in-house procedures
 ATR part of the “PBN in Indonesia” ICAO workshops launched early 2016
 Cooperation between Civil Aviation Authority, Operators, Airbus/Navblue and ATR
to design, validate and publish new instrumented approaches on 3 airports
(target for publication: end of 2017)
 In parallel, Indonesian authorities plan to publish procedures on 6 airports in 2017.

 Early 2017, ATR proposed EASA to add 10 to 15 procedures to be designed per year
 Main goals:
 Enhance safety
 Improve operations (less number of flights cancelled)
 Reduce fuel burn
PAGE 23
ATR’s INNOVATIVE SOLUTION FOR ENHANCED OPS
ClearVisionTM System
 New in commercial aviation
Natural
 Head-up display and more… vision
 Enhanced Flight Vision System (EFVS) suitable
for all weather conditions, low visibility operations,
day and night situations
 Improved pilot awareness in poor weather conditions

 Replace natural pilot vision by enhanced vision Enhanced
vision
 “EFVS to land” concept

 Asset for airlines and passengers
 less delays, diversions, cancellations
Breakthrough technology for great operational gains

PAGE 24
I. ATR Fundamentals

VI. Feedbacks
DATA MINING & ANALYSIS PROJECT
 Use of Flight data to analyse fuel efficiency

and help airlines achieve concrete fuel
savings.
2. Data processing
and cleaning
 Objectives
• Collect data automatically from various
3. Advanced
IT systems of an airline 1. Data collection data
• Check and improve quality of the data analytic
tools
• Provide sophisticated analysis – tools to identify
fuel savings potential
• Provide tools to monitor the progress of the fuel
efficiency improvement program
• Communicate the results to stakeholders
5. Impact
assessment and 4. Fuel savings
trend monitoring opportunities
identification
PAGE 26
I. ATR Fundamentals

VI. Feedbacks
NEW LIGHTER GEVEN SFE SEATS
 Enhancing passenger comfort and weight savings
 2 types of seats: Neo Classic with pre-reclined backrest and

Neo Prestige incl. backrest wih recline
 New ergonomic shape with more leg room  1” pitch improvement

compared to existing light seats and 27” pitch capable
 Weight savings: between 100-170 kg on a standard shipset
 Improved personal space: seat width at 18” to provide

same comfort as single aisle
 Retrofittable
 Validated by customers and available in our mock-up. Significant

passenger space improvement endorsed by airlines at the Aircraft
Interiors Expo in Hamburg.
PAGE 28
VERY LIGHT SEATS - BFE SOLUTION
 New Titanium-made seat concept developed by
 Up to 300kg weight savings

 increased payload from challenging airfields:
short runways, hot and high terrains, etc.
 Retrofittable
 Already flying with
Available since Q2 2016
PAGE 29
ONBOARD WIRELESS CONTENT STREAMING
Standalone box
• Efficient integration
• Light weight (less than 4kg)
• Easy upgrade
• e-News
• e-Inflight magazine
• e-passenger questionnaire
Save weight with efficient system and paperless cabin

PAGE 30
I. ATR Fundamentals

VI. Feedbacks
TALK ABOUT ON ATRACTIVE
 ATRactive is a unique customer portal to access all e-services, including

• E-spares
• News & events
• Request Management
• ATR Documentation
• Catalogue services
 ATRactive includes a customer

forum, “TalkAbout”.
 Possibility to create a dedicated
Fuel Efficiency topic?
PAGE 32
CONTACTS
 For questions related to flight operations  Flight Ops Support team:
ops.support@atr-aircraft.com or “Request ATR” on ATRactive website
 For all other questions regarding environment topics  Solène Flahault-Rosey:
solene.flahault-rosey@atr-aircraft.com
PAGE 33
© ATR. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
This document shall not be reproduced or disclosed to a third party without the written consent of ATR. This
document and its content shall not be used for any purpose other than that for which it is supplied.
ATR, its logo, the distinctive ATR aircraft profiles and patented information relating to the ATR aircraft are the
exclusive property of ATR and are subject to copyright. This document and all information contained herein are
the sole property of ATR. No intellectual property right is granted through, or induced by, the delivery of this
document or the disclosure of its content.
The statements made herein do not constitute an offer or a representation. They are based on the mentioned
assumptions and are expressed in good faith.

Atr Documents May 24 2017

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Atr Documents May 24 2017

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Atr Documents May 24 2017

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ATR-600 Series

The Latest Generation Turboprop

AIRBUS FUEL EFFICIENCY

Toulouse, 17th May 2017

II. Fuel Savings Initiatives

III. State-of-the-art Avionics Ready For Future

IV. Data Mining & Analysis project

V. Weight Reduction Opportunities

II. Fuel Savings Initiatives

III. State-of-the-art Avionics Ready For Future

IV. Data Mining & Analysis project

V. Weight Reduction Opportunities

ATR 42-300 ATR 42-320 ATR 42-500 ATR 42-600

1985 1987 1995 2012

1989 1992 1997 2011

ATR 72-200 ATR 72-210 ATR 72-500 ATR 72-600

ATR backbone continuous product development

Same type rating ATR 42 / 72

Fuel burn (kg)

Relative percentage of CO2 emissions / seat

70 Seaters 90 Seaters 100 Seaters

2,000 tonnes less emissions / year with an ATR vs. TP competitor

Effective Perceived Noise in decibel

ICAO Chapter 4 limit – 2006

ICAO Chapter 14 limit – 2017/2020

 BRA biofuel flight

 Biohub project with Airbus & Total

II. Fuel Savings Initiatives

III. State-of-the-art Avionics Ready For Future

IV. Data Mining & Analysis project

V. Weight Reduction Opportunities

 On-line support: very few questions received from operators on fuel-efficiency

 Fuel Saving brochure

 Guidelines for fuel efficient operations

> Vertical path

Taxi out Taxi in

 ATR Performance Software for engineering purposes

Module 1 – Takeoff and landing charts

Module 2 – In-flight performance for climb, cruise, descent

Module 3 – Operational flight plan

Module 4 – Decision point for driftdown limitations

Module 5 – Cruise Performance Monitoring

 Long Range Cruise as an  Flight preparation

800 Cruise - 45 kgs

 The Cruise Performance Monitoring module (CPM) allows to compare actual

Manual recording Manual entry

FOS module 5 output => Fuel flow

© ATR. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY DOCUMENT.

II. Fuel Savings Initiatives

III. State-of-the-art Avionics Ready For Future

IV. Data Mining & Analysis project

V. Weight Reduction Opportunities

 Modular & flexible architecture

ATR is ready for future navigation standards

 APproaches with Vertical guidance (APV)

APV brings safe and optimised vertical profile

APV improves regional airport operations

ATR, designed for optimised approach

 Le Touquet airport (LFAT)