Trend and Issue About End of Life in Icu
Trend and Issue About End of Life in Icu
Trend and Issue About End of Life in Icu
SUPPORTING LECTURER:
ARRAGED BY:
Nim : P1337420620039
NURSING DEPARTEMENT
2023
TREND AND ISSUE ABOUT END OF LIFE IN ICU
End-of-life care is a global concern. During EOL care, many patients experience life
events, where they have insufficient control over important changes in their lives leading to
confusion. Nurses are well-versed in the physical and psychological conditions and
preferences of their patients and hence, must cope with these complex needs. Critical care
nurses play an integral role in supporting older patients and their families facing the EOL
care decision-making challenge. Despite national imperatives to improve the quality of EOL
care, patients continue to experience uncontrolled pain, inadequate communication, and life-
sustaining treatment against their will (Kim et al., 2021).
In the Intensive Care Unit patients are submitted to sophisticated treatments in order
to support organ failure while specific therapies are administrated in an attempt to
definitively control the disease. Unfortunately, this goal is not always obtained and despite
great improvements in the care of critical patients, death is frequent in the ICU setting and is
often preceded by decisions to forego lifesustaining treatments (Consales et al., 2014).
A high percentage of patients die in the ICU, often after a prolonged period of illness
and being unable to make decisions for themselves. Timely communication about life
expectancy and endof-life care is crucial for ensuring good patient quality-of-life at the end of
life and a good quality of death. In such conditions, the responsibility for these decisions falls
upon clinical staff and patient's relatives. The decision making process must be aimed to
choose amongst treatment options trying to meet patients and families' wishes and "shared
decision making" is now considered as the best practice in dealing with the EOL dilemmas in
the ICU. Ensuring the autonomy consists in respecting the selfdetermination of patients and
supporting them such that they can make their own decisions, as many times as it is possible.
Beneficence refers to providing potential or actual benefits to patients, whilst non-
maleficence is a broad concept including active and passive measures .
EOL choices can be subdivided into two broad categories. Choices are
"unconstrained" when multiple treatment options are available and limited only by clinical
standards and patient's preferences. On the other hand, sometimes choices can be
«constrained» due to unavailability or to inherent impossibility to work. The latter cases of
constrained choices imply many ethical problems. Indeed, unavailability of treatment options
must be limited by the adoption of good clinical practice criteria, mainly standard admission
and discharge criteria and expediting bed flow. Doing so, the need for rationing or «allocation
of health resources in the face of limited availability» can be dramatically reduced. Triage is
required when needs exceed supply, in order to provide the best to everyone who needs,
relying upon objective and transparent criteria of priority.
Respect and care for a patient should include respect for the cultural group values
involved in their decision-making process. These principles represent the prerequisites for
the conduction of the "Family Meeting" in the ICU that must be recognized as a basic
procedure in critical care. The Family Meeting is a multidisciplinary procedure aimed to
achieve shared choices while allowing humanization of care when dealing with EOL
decisions in the ICU. The practice goals of a Family Meeting have been widely
described29e31 and can be summarised as follows. First of all, physicians have to assess the
family understanding and concerns, sharing information and providing emotional support.
Doing so, it is possible to build trust and to encourage the relatives to use substituted
judgement to establish the goals of care. The Family Meeting may be reactively initiated in
response to specified problems, or it may be proactively established on a routine basis.
A conceptual model of the domains of physicians' skill at providing high quality end-
of-life care was described by Curtis et al. First of all, a dyad of cognitive and affective skills
is considered as the basis for an adequate communication with patients/families that focus on
the patients' values in order to construct a patientcentred care system. Despite a growing body
of scientific evidence and clinical experience mandates a specific training on bioethical
aspects of clinical practice in critical care, significant shortcomings in the quality of end of
life care are still observed. Indeed, patients and their families are often not satisfied with the
care received at the end of life in the ICU and communication with caregivers is the least
accomplished factor in quality of care.
REFERENCES
Consales, G., Zamidei, L., & Michelagnoli, G. (2014). Education and training for moral and
ethical decision-making at the end of life in critical care. Trends in Anaesthesia and
Critical Care, 4(6), 178–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tacc.2014.10.005
Kim, K., Jang, S. G., & Lee, K. S. (2021). A network analysis of research topics and trends in
end-of-life care and nursing. International Journal of Environmental Research and
Public Health, 18(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010313