Discourse Competence
Discourse Competence
4 (2021) 149
DISCUSSION
ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHERS' PRACTICES
OF DEVELOPING DISCOURSE COMPETENCE
THROUGH SPEAKING SKILLS FOR GRADE 10 STUDENTS:
A CASE STUDY
Abstract: Being one of the compulsory foreign languages in Vietnam and recently regarded as
one of the requirements for higher education enlistment, English has received growing attention from
Vietnam high school students (Nguyen, 2021). In Circular 32 (2018), the Vietnam Ministry of Education
and Training [MOET] officially recognised communicative competence as the primary outcome of the
English National Program of which Discourse Competence (DC) is a crucial component (MOET, 2018).
Although the program aims to achieve the outcome with more emphasis on listening and speaking skills,
Vietnamese high school students remain to struggle to form extended spoken discourse (Le, 2011). With
the view to gaining insights into the actual state of cultivating DC through speaking skills in students,
the study investigates four Grade 10 teachers with varied backgrounds and teaching styles in a private
school awarded twice by the MOET for educational reforms and their attempts to integrate CLT in the
English language teaching curriculum. After conducting the interviews and classroom observation, the
findings imply that teachers devised a combination of approaches that had implicit impacts on different
aspects of DC-based on students' English proficiency while preserving their teaching philosophies. Such
innovativeness could suggest a rudimentary framework for teaching and teacher training programs
regarding fostering DC in speaking for EFL students.
Keywords: English language teachers, discourse competence, speaking skills, perceptions,
practices, grade 10 students, Hanoi
*
Corresponding author.
Email address: nhauyen6299@gmail.com
https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4754
VNU JOURNAL OF FOREIGN STUDIES, VOL. 37, NO. 4 (2021) 150
CEFR after graduation from high school numerous challenges, such as being
(Vietnam Ministry of Education and inexperienced and the negative washback
Training, 2018) and increase their chances of from the high-impact exams (Bui, 2006;
getting into a qualified university (Ngoc, Nguyen et al., 2017; Nguyen et al., 2020)
2021). To catch up with the status quo, the 2) the issue of how to foster DC through
Ministry of Education and Training [MOET] speaking skills which is crucial to
has released Circular 32 in 2018, aiming to communicate in foreign languages (Egan,
renovate the National English Program that 1999). All in all, the research question of the
gave official recognition of CLT with study is:
emphasis on listening and speaking skills "What are the teaching practices
with communicative competence as the applied by English language teachers to
outcome (MOET, 2018). Although speaking foster the development of discourse
is recognised as a critical skill in language competence through speaking skills for
learning (Egan, 1999), students are Grade 10 students?"
accustomed to a grammar-based approach.
Quite predictably, they found producing an 2. Literature Review
extended speech an arduous task (Le, 2011;
Nguyen, 2021). "Competence" was first coined by
Chomsky (2014) that views language as
Dating back to the last few decades,
existing independently from context.
numerous efforts have been put into
However, it is soon re-considered a dynamic
delineating and constructing a relevant
process to use the language pragmatically
framework to foster and assess
(Savignon, 1983; Stern et al., 1983).
communicative competence, the ultimate
Communicative competence can be
outcome of language learning (Canale &
generally understood as a set of knowledge
Swain, 1980; Celce-Murcia et al., 1995;
and skills required to communicate (Canale
Pham, 2007). Among components of
& Swain, 1980; Savignon, 1983). The goal
communicative competence, discourse
of this concept is to put forward the
competence (DC), the ability to produce
fundamentals for effective communication
extended text and speech (Pennycook,
(Celce-Murcia, 2008) and establish a
1994), is crucial in achieving
foundation for CLT (Canale, 1983).
communicative competence and interacting
According to Circular 32 (2018),
efficiently in a cross-cultural environment
communicative competence is "the ability to
(Castro et al., 2004). Despite the attempts to
apply knowledge about language
lay the theoretical groundwork for actual
components like lexis, grammar, and
language teaching practices, investigations
phonology to fulfil communication activities
into applications and methods to cultivate
in speaking, listening, writing, reading to
communicative competence in students are
meet personal or social demands" (MOET,
limited, especially when it involves the
2018, p. 16). Communicative competence
techniques needed to foster a specific
has been delineated through history, from
component of communicative competence.
only two components (linguistic and
Regarding DC, past studies only focused on
sociolinguistic) (Hymes, 1972) to five
writing and reading skills (Mauranen, 1996;
(Canale & Swain, 1980; Canale, 1983;
Do et al., 2018). Hence, to amend for the
Celce-Murcia et al., 1995). The most
possible gap in the body of literature, this
updated model presented by Celce-Murcia et
study aims at 1) the Grade 10 EFL teachers,
al. (1995) defines the five components as
who are at the frontline to be in charge of
discourse competence, linguistic
students' learning while concurrently facing
VNU JOURNAL OF FOREIGN STUDIES, VOL. 37, NO. 4 (2021) 151
Cohesion
Deixis
- Personal (pronouns)
- Spatial (here, there; this, that)
- Temporal (now, then; before, after)
- Discourse/textual (the following chart; the example above)
Coherence
Genre/Generic structures
Conversational structures (inherent to the turn-taking system in conversation but may extend to a
variety of oral genres)
Practice is widely understood as of CLT (Li, 1998; Maley, 1984; Liao, 2000;
collecting an individual's mindset, Do, 2009; Pham, 2017). Among different
experience, skills, and behaviours (Larrivee, parts of communicative competence,
2008). On top of that, the characteristic of discourse competence is prevalent in
practice is what the participants actively act research looking into the EFL teaching of
out their consciousness in real situations, or writing skills (Belmonte & McCabe, 2004;
in other words, what they do (Ellis, 2002; Yang & Sun, 2012), reading skills (Cziko,
Grossman et al., 2009; Lampert, 2010). In 1978; Mauranen, 1996; Ntuli & Pretorius,
this sense, teaching practice is when teachers 2005), and the integration of ICT to help
carry out professional tasks based on their developing discourse competence (Chun,
perceptions of a matter (Lampert, 2010). 1994; Hussein et al., 2016). The findings
Practice entails techniques for facilitating implied that students' performance was
the ability to connect language in alignment improved with the advent of ICT. In
with the lesson objectives and some Vietnam, Do (2018) conducted experimental
everyday activities to form different stages research that showed students' writing skills
of classroom discourse like giving have favourable progress when being taught
presentations, telling stories, etc. (Richard, discoursal knowledge.
2005; Legutke, 2012). In this research, Additionally, discourse competence
practices of fostering DC in students refer to is also underscored as the goal that language
how teachers monitor the classroom and set users should attain to communicate
up activities that intentionally aim to effectively in a multicultural environment
facilitate a particular or a few aspects of DC. (Castro et al., 2004; Ngo, 2012; Nguyen,
Previous studies primarily focused 2016) with suggestions on diversifying the
on establishing the fundamentals of input of students in the class to enhance DC.
communicative competence models by The input should range from knowledge of
eminent researchers, such as Halliday and the language, knowledge of the
Hasan (1989), Hymes (1972), Canale and field/profession, to the world's knowledge
Swain (1980), Celce-Murcia and Thurrell (Do, 2009). In addition, the social-cultural
(1995), Bachman (1990), Savignon (1983), understanding of the speaking context is
Brown (2000), and the like. In Asian deemed indispensable from discourse
countries and Vietnam, multiple attempts competence. Hence, the input relevant to this
have been made to summarise the work of area is equally vital to cross-cultural
eminent experts to propagandise the benefits interactions (Ngo, 2012).
VNU JOURNAL OF FOREIGN STUDIES, VOL. 37, NO. 4 (2021) 153
overseas institution
institution
Years of 11 3 8 16
experiences
Relevant Specialised in Novice teacher. Used to study Currently a senior
experiences teaching false Used to teach abroad for a teacher and academic
beginner English in public master’s degree manager. Used to be
students. school for 2 in TESOL for 1 the Head of the
years. year. English department in
her previous job.
Classroom 33 students, 12 34 students, 18 31 students, 15 32 students, 19 boys
profile girls and 21 girls and 16 boys girls and 18 boys and 13 girls
boys Pre-intermediate Upper- Advanced level,
Foundational level, around B1- intermediate around C1-
level, around level, around B2-
A2+
After sending the invitation letters teacher had six observation sessions with a
and receiving approval from both the school pre-session and post-session interview for
principal and four EFL teachers, each each lesson.
Table 3
Data Collection Procedure
Name of the stages Content of the stage
Pre-session interview Objectives of the lesson & Rationale for each activity in the lesson in
(N = 6) terms of helping students to develop DC in students
Observation Practices of developing discourse competence in class
(N = 6)
Post-session interview Reflections on the lesson and the effectiveness of in-class practices to
(N = 6) develop DC in students
listening audios, and videos. The link picking up accurate expressions to use in
between input and development of DC has specific contexts, which is believed to
been recognised by Do (2009) and Ngo consolidate grammatico-lexical cohesion
(2012) when the input is the prerequisite for (Li, 2013).
DC, especially grammatico-lexical Regarding coherence, Huong
cohesion. allowed students to constantly review and
Huong gave attention to both reflect on the thematic staging of their
grammatical and lexical aspects of cohesion. speech by noting down their ideas on the
In terms of grammar, she instructed students paper and using the notes for speaking. With
to practice the same structure with slight the combination of task repetition
variation throughout a lesson. Regarding (answering the question structure "what
vocabulary, she extended the words with somebody is/are like") and pre-task planning
similar ones belonging to the same category (using side notes), the two most used
and explained the connotations behind each scaffolding strategies, Huong could reduce
word to widen students' lexical chains. The the strain put on students if they had to
session was inductive rather than deductive, impromptu. Notably, these scaffoldings also
a more preferred instruction delivery automatised some of the cognitive stages
approach in CLT (Nunan, 1987; Tan, 2005). required for speaking so that students could
It allows students to interact with the target focus more on the thematic structure of the
content as a cognitive process (Piaget, 1976). speech (Cameron et al., 1996; Skehan, 1998;
[Observation extract 1] Segalowitz, 2010).
Huong: So what are your friends like? [Observation extract 2]
Student A (who was reading the Huong: Next, please tell us what
notes of student B with three adjectives your parents like. C, can you tell me?
describing himself noted down): He is lazy, Student C: My mother is strict,
fat, and loyal. violent, and hard-working.
Huong: Really? B? Huong: What, your mom is violent?
Student B: Yes. Student C: Yes, when I do wrong, she
Huong: Alright, good job A and B, will hit me. But I know she loves me in her
but I don't think you should use that own way.
adjective. In English, there are words with Huong: That is typical of Asian
similar meanings but have very different tones. moms. We have different levels of Asian
The class: yeah, true moms, do you know? Like the slipper level,
the broom level, the plate level.
Huong: You can, like, use chubby
instead. Chubby is quite cute. But fat, no, if (Some of the students started to giggle).
that was your girlfriend, you could be in Student C: My mom uses hanger.
great trouble. Huong: It's only a bit over slipper
Class: (laugh) level. You are still lucky.
By giving prompts to students to (C and other students laughed).
produce their discourse first then navigating From the extract above, the
them to reflect on the connotations of their conversation was genuine and casual
choices of language was one of the ways to because Huong demanded an authentic
leave a long-lasting impression of discourse response from the students. Hence, no
formation on students (Long, 1981). As a reading materials and dictionaries should be
result, they would be more mindful of
VNU JOURNAL OF FOREIGN STUDIES, VOL. 37, NO. 4 (2021) 157
Another student: Do you grade us for then whether the speakers needed to
this? "practice more" with no insightful
Lan: Who can speak well will receive suggestions or solutions. The absence of a
a bonus point. And who is called but refuses well-defined marking rubric and proper
to speak will get the point deduced. I will peer-feedback training could be held
show the structures, vocabulary and main accountable for this (Zhu, 1995; Berg, 1999).
ideas from the previous reading passage. Hoa – The listener
You can look at it and speak.
Hoa was an EFL teacher with
Unlike Huong and other experienced considerable experience relating to
EFL teachers, Lan spoon-fed students the intercultural communication. Her students
structures, vocabulary and ideas to the point were of around B1 to B2 level following the
of over-scaffolding (Willis, 1996). It took CEFR. Her students praised her for being an
away the freedom to produce and maintain a excellent listener because she paid close
discourse independently to make it cohesive attention to what the students said during the
and coherent to the listeners (Piaget, 1976; lessons and could recall it with high
Vygotsky, 1978).
accuracy in the subsequent speaking
Like Huong, Lan taught students the sessions. Even her students were amazed at
presentation format "because it was ready- her excellent memory.
made in the textbook, so it is quite Due to the time limitation, she
convenient". Lan relied extensively on organised speaking activities in the class
feedback to guide students to present following the think - pair - share sequence.
appropriately, even though she did not Accordingly, students were guided to level
adhere to a pre-determined marking rubric.
up from just mechanically repeating what
This might help to create an interactive was learned, critically review the
lesson. However, the feedback was information, and then use it to create
repetitive and redundant across different something of their own. Because the
performances. previous activity effectively scaffolded the
[Observation extract 4] subsequent ones, students had plenty of time
Lan: Okay, anyone wants to ask any to review the text's cohesive devices and
question or comment. Remember this is coherent structures (Ellis, 2008; Wood et al.,
compulsory. Group one, anyone wants to 1976).
speak? The same as Huong and Lan,
A student from group one: I think.. receptive input was an indispensable part of
They speak very well. Especially students X Hoa's classroom. Her speaking activities
and Y. The slide is pretty, and the font is easy were tied with the content of the prior
to read. But student Z needs to speak more materials. A wide variety of input helped
confidently. equip students with general knowledge, the
Lan: I agree. The presentation is foundation of DC development (Castro et
logical, the slide is nicely designed, they can al., 2004; Do, 2009; Ngo, 2012). She asked
use pictures and videos to illustrate their questions to help students figure out how the
ideas. But I agree, Z needs to practice more idea was arranged and supported in the text.
at home. Maybe you should present in front Then, there was a follow-up speaking
of the mirror. session where students had the chance to
apply what they learned from the sample
Most of the feedback had similar
content. First, it mentioned the visual aid, instantly into use.
VNU JOURNAL OF FOREIGN STUDIES, VOL. 37, NO. 4 (2021) 159
Edwards, A. D. (1987). Language code and classroom Hymes. D. (1972). On communicative competence.
practice. Oxford Review of Education, 13(3), In J. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.),
237-247. Sociolinguistics (pp. 269-293). Penguin Books.
Egan, K. B. (1999). Speaking: A critical skill and a Kinneavy, J. L. (1971). A theory of discourse. W.W.
challenge. CALICO Journal, 16(3), 277-293. Norton & Company.
Ellis, E. (2002). Teaching from experience: A new Lampert, M. (2010). Learning teaching in, from, and
perspective on the non-native teacher in for practice: What do we mean? Journal of
adult ESL. Australian Review of Applied Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 21-34.
Linguistics, 25(1), 71-107. Larrivee, B. (2008). Development of a tool to assess
Ellis, N. C. (2008). The dynamics of second language teachers' level of reflective practice.
emergence: Cycles of language use, Reflective Practice, 9(3), 341-360.
language change, and language acquisition. Le, N. (2011, May 21). Vì sao học sinh Việt Nam
The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), "ngại" nói tiếng Anh? [Why do Vietnamese
232-249. students hesitate to speak English?]. Dân trí.
Feagin, J. R., Orum, A. M., & Sjoberg, G. (Eds.). https://dantri.com.vn/giao-duc-huong-
(1991). A case for the case study. UNC Press nghiep/vi-sao-hoc-sinh-viet-nam-ngai-noi-
Books. tieng-anh-1306225111.htm
Fischer, R. A. (1979). The inductive-deductive Legutke, M. K. (2012). Teaching teenagers. In J. C.
controversy revisited. The Modern Richards & A. Burns (Eds.), The Cambridge
Language Journal, 63(3), 98-105. guide to pedagogy and practice in second
Flowerdew, J. (2002). Genre in the classroom: A language teaching. Cambridge University
linguistic approach. In A. M. Johns (Ed.), Press.
Genre in the classroom: Multiple Li, D. (1998). It's always more difficult than you plan
perspectives (pp. 91-102). Routledge. and imagine: Teachers' perceived
Gable, G. G. (1994). Integrating case study and difficulties in introducing the
survey research methods: An example in communicative approach in South Korea.
information systems. European Journal of TESOL Quarterly, 32, 677-703.
Information Systems, 3(2), 112-126. Li, H., & Lui, Y. (2011). A brief study of reticence in
Golkova, D., & Hubackova, S. (2014). Productive ESL class. Theory and Practice in Language
skills in second language learning. Studies, 1(8), 961-965.
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Li, J. (2013). The application and significance of
143, 477-481. discourse cohesion and analysis in practical
Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., teaching of foreign language. Theory and
Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009). Practice in Language Studies, 3(8), 1393.
Teaching practice: A cross-professional Liao, X. (2000). How communicative language
perspective. Teachers College Record, teaching became acceptable in secondary
111(9), 2055-2100. schools in China. The Internet TESL Journal,
Halliday, M., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, 6(10). http://iteslj.org/Articles/Liao-
and text: Aspects of language in a social CLTinChina.html
semiotic perspective. Oxford University Press. Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction, and second‐
Hammerly, H. (1975). The deduction/induction language acquisition. Annals of the New
controversy. The Modern Language York Academy of Sciences, 379(1), 259-278.
Journal, 59(1/2), 15-18. MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1989). Anxiety
Hanks, W. F. (1992). The indexical ground of deictic and second‐language learning: Toward a
reference. Cambridge University Press. theoretical clarification. Language
Learning, 39(2), 251-275.
Hussein, N. O., & Elttayef, A. I. (2016). The impact
of utilising Skype as a social tool network Maley, A. (1984). On chalk and cheese, babies and
community on developing English major bathwater and squared circles: Can
students' discourse competence in the traditional and communicative approaches
English language syllables. Journal of be reconciled? In P. Larson, E. L. Judd &
Education and Practice, 7(11), 29-33. D. S. Messerschmitt (Eds.), On TESOL'84
(pp. 159-169). TESOL.
VNU JOURNAL OF FOREIGN STUDIES, VOL. 37, NO. 4 (2021) 164
Mauranen, A. (1996). Discourse competence - chí Khoa học và Công nghệ - Đại học Thái
evidence from thematic development in Nguyên, 167(07), 67-71.
native and non-native texts. In E. Vantola & Nguyen, T. H. (2002). Vietnam: Cultural background
A. Mauranen (Eds.), Pragmatics and beyond for ESL/EFL teachers. The Review of
new series (pp. 195 -230). John Benjamins Vietnamese Studies, 2(1), 1-6.
Publishing Company.
Nguyen, T. T. H., & Nguyen, T. H. (2020). Nghiên
McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse analysis for cứu sử dụng tài liệu bổ trợ trong dạy kỹ năng
language teachers. Cambridge University nói tiếng Anh tại trường trung học phổ thông
Press. [An investigation into using supplementary
Merrell, J., & Williams, A. (1994). Participant materials in teaching English speaking skills
observation and informed consent: at high school]. TNU Journal of Science and
Relationships and tactical decision-making Technology, 225(12), 64-69.
in nursing research. Nursing Ethics, 1(3), Ntuli, D., & Pretorius, E. J. (2005). Laying
163-172. foundations for academic language
National Center for Education. (2019, July 24). Giáo competence: The effects of storybook
viên, yếu tố then chốt nâng cao chất lượng reading on Zulu language, literacy and
dạy và học ngoại ngữ [Teachers as the key discourse development. Southern African
factor in enhancing foreign language Linguistics and Applied Language Studies,
education’s quality]. Vietnam Ministry of 23(1), 91-109.
Education and Training. Nunan, D. (1987). Communicative language
https://moet.gov.vn/Pages/tim- teaching: Making it work. ELT Journal,
kiem.aspx?ItemID=6131 41(2), 136-145.
Ngo, H. H. (2012). Vai trò của văn hóa và kiến thức Pace, G. (1992). Stories of teacher-initiated change
văn hóa nền trong việc hình thành và tiếp from traditional to whole-language literacy
nhận diễn ngôn [The role of culture and instruction. Elementary School Journal,
cultural knowledge in discourse formation 92(4), 461-476.
and acquisition]. VNU Journal of Foreign
Pennycook, A. (1994). Incommensurable discourses?
Studies, 28(1), 25-32.
Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 115-138.
Ngoc, D. (2021, April 14). Các trường xét tuyển bằng
Pham, H. H. (2007). Communicative language
chứng chỉ quốc tế, nhiều học sinh thiệt thòi?
teaching: Unity within diversity. ELT
[English international certificate as an
Journal, 61(3), 193-201.
significant advantage in higher education’s
application: An opportunity or barrier?] Pham, H. L. (2017). Phát triển năng lực tiếng của
Tuổi trẻ online. https://tuoitre.vn/cac- người học dưới ánh sáng lý luận ngôn ngữ
truong-xet-tuyen-bang-chung-chi-quoc-te- học hiện đại [Language learners’ proficiency
nhieu-hoc-sinh-thiet-thoi- development in the light of modern
20210414084953175.htm linguistics]. Tạp chí Khoa học giáo dục, 142,
34-37.
Nguyen, H. N. (2021, March 12). 'Tôi biết nhiều học
sinh học chưa tốt tiếng Anh' [I am aware that Piaget, J. (1976). Piaget's theory. In B. Inhelder, N.
there are students who might not be fluent in N. Chipman & C. Zwingmann (Eds.), Piaget
English]. Tuổi trẻ online. and his school (pp. 11-23). Springer.
https://tuoitre.vn/toi-biet-nhieu-hoc-sinh- Postiglione, G. A., Wang, L. & Watkins, D. (2008).
hoc-chua-tot-tieng-anh- Vocational and continuing education in
20210312215855479.htm China. In P. A. Elsner, G. R. Boggs & J. T.
Nguyen, Q. (2016). Từ năng lực ngôn ngữ đến năng Irwin (Eds.), Global development of
lực liên văn hoá [From linguistic community colleges, technical colleges, and
competence to intercultural competence]. further education programs (pp. 91-104).
VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 32(3), 1-9. American Association of Community
Colleges.
Nguyen, Q. T., Duong, C. D., & Vu, K. H. (2017).
Thiết kế chương trình bổ trợ nói cho học sinh Rajesh, M. (2015). Revolution in communication
lớp 10 trường trung học phổ thông Thái technologies: Impact on distance education.
Nguyên [Designing a supplementary Turkish Online Journal of Distance
English speaking material for the 10 th form Education, 16(1), 62-88.
students at Thai Nguyen high school]. Tạp
VNU JOURNAL OF FOREIGN STUDIES, VOL. 37, NO. 4 (2021) 165
Tóm tắt: Tiếng Anh hiện nay đã trở thành môn học bắt buộc từ bậc tiểu học và dần trở thành
một tiêu chí xét tuyển quan trọng tại các bậc đại học và cao đẳng, cho nên việc học tiếng Anh đã trở
thành ưu tiên hàng đầu của rất nhiều học sinh trung học phổ thông (Nguyen, 2021). Thêm vào đó, việc
học tiếng Anh hiện nay đang hướng đến hình thành năng lực giao tiếp cho học sinh, mà năng lực diễn
ngôn chính là một phần không thể thiếu. Đây cũng là một mục tiêu then chốt được khẳng định trong
Thông tư 32 (2018) của Bộ Giáo dục và Đào tạo. Mặc dù chương trình tiếng Anh mới đã có sự chú trọng
nhiều hơn vào các kĩ năng giao tiếp như nghe và nói, nhưng học sinh vẫn gặp nhiều khó khăn khi diễn
ngôn bằng lời (Le, 2011). Để mở ra những phương án giải quyết nhằm nâng cao năng lực diễn ngôn
thông qua kĩ năng nói cho học sinh, nghiên cứu đã tập trung vào bốn đối tượng giáo viên tiếng Anh với
lý lịch, kinh nghiệm và phong cách giảng dạy đa dạng từ một hệ thống giáo dục đã hai lần được giải
thưởng của Bộ Giáo dục và Đào tạo cho những đóng góp vào phong trào cải cách giáo dục và đưa đường
hướng giao tiếp vào giảng dạy tiếng Anh. Sau khi thực hiện phỏng vấn và quan sát lớp học của bốn giáo
viên, nghiên cứu nhận thấy giáo viên thường kết hợp linh hoạt nhiều cách tiếp cận khác nhau để giúp
học sinh phát triển năng lực diễn ngôn, tuy nhiên, sự kết hợp này vẫn phản ảnh đúng phương châm và
phong cách giảng dạy của giáo viên đó. Kết quả của nghiên cứu có thể trở thành nguồn tham khảo hữu
ích cho các giáo viên tiếng Anh, cũng như mở ra bước đầu trong việc xây dựng một bộ quy chiếu giúp
giáo viên tự tìm ra phương pháp thích hợp để nâng cao năng lực diễn ngôn cho học sinh của mình.
Từ khóa: giáo viên tiếng Anh, năng lực diễn ngôn, kĩ năng nói, nhận thức, thực hành, học sinh
lớp 10, Hà Nội