Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 11 views

    Hossein

    Uploaded by

    mohsen morshedi
    The document summarizes the results of a structural analysis for two load combinations - LRFD-Nonlin and Emh-Nonlin. For each load combination, it provides the demands on the frame (forces and moments), demand/capacity ratios, member properties, and checks that capacities are sufficient for axial force, bending, shear, and other limit states. The analysis found the demands were below the prescribed capacity limits for all limit states checked under both load combinations.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Hossein

    Uploaded by

    mohsen morshedi
    11 views2 pages
    The document summarizes the results of a structural analysis for two load combinations - LRFD-Nonlin and Emh-Nonlin. For each load combination, it provides the demands on the frame (forces and moments), demand/capacity ratios, member properties, and checks that capacities are sufficient for axial force, bending, shear, and other limit states. The analysis found the demands were below the prescribed capacity limits for all limit states checked under both load combinations.

    Original Title

    hossein

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document summarizes the results of a structural analysis for two load combinations - LRFD-Nonlin and Emh-Nonlin. For each load combination, it provides the demands on the frame (forces and moments), demand/capacity ratios, member properties, and checks that capacities are sufficient for axial force, bending, shear, and other limit states. The analysis found the demands were below the prescribed capacity limits for all limit states checked under both load combinations.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    11 views2 pages

    Hossein

    Uploaded by

    mohsen morshedi
    The document summarizes the results of a structural analysis for two load combinations - LRFD-Nonlin and Emh-Nonlin. For each load combination, it provides the demands on the frame (forces and moments), demand/capacity ratios, member properties, and checks that capacities are sufficient for axial force, bending, shear, and other limit states. The analysis found the demands were below the prescribed capacity limits for all limit states checked under both load combinations.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    results of LRFD Project

    Job Number
    Load combination Engineer
    SAP2000
    AISC 360-16 STEEL SECTION CHECK (Summary for Combo and Station)
    Units : Kgf, m, C

    Frame : 2 X Mid: -2.1 Combo: LRFD-Nonlin Design Type: Column


    Length: 3.2 Y Mid: -2.1 Shape: IPE270 Frame Type: SMF
    Loc : 3.2 Z Mid: 4.8 Class: Compact Princpl Rot: 0. degrees

    Provision: LRFD Analysis: Direct Analysis


    D/C Limit=0.95 2nd Order: General 2nd Order Reduction: Tau-b Fixed
    AlphaPr/Py=0.032 AlphaPr/Pe=0.042 Tau_b=1. EA factor=0.8 EI factor=0.8

    PhiB=0.9 PhiC=0.9 PhiTY=0.9 PhiTF=0.75


    PhiS=0.9 PhiS-RI=1. PhiST=0.9

    A=0.005 I33=5.790E-05 r33=0.112 S33=4.289E-04 Av3=0.002


    J=1.590E-07 I22=4.200E-06 r22=0.03 S22=6.222E-05 Av2=0.002
    E=2.039E+10 Fy=24000000. Ry=1.2 z33=4.840E-04 Cw=7.087E-08
    RLLF=1. Fu=37000000. z22=9.700E-05

    STRESS CHECK FORCES & MOMENTS (Combo LRFD-Nonlin)


    Location Pu Mu33 Mu22 Vu2 Vu3 Tu
    3.2 -3503.863 2890.647 -1.426E-15 -1560.762 -1.407E-14 -4.672E-18

    PMM DEMAND/CAPACITY RATIO (H1-1b)


    D/C Ratio: 0.307 = 0.031 + 0.277 + 0.
    = (1/2)(Pr/Pc) + (Mr33/Mc33) + (Mr22/Mc22)

    COMPACTNESS
    Slenderness Lambda Lambda_p Lambda_r Lambda_s Compactness
    Major/Flange 6.618 11.076 29.147 Compact
    /Web 33.273 109.592 166.137 260. Compact
    Minor/Flange 6.618 11.076 29.147 Compact
    /Web 33.273 109.592 166.137 260. Compact
    Axial/Flange 6.618 16.322 Compact
    /Web 33.273 43.429 Compact

    AXIAL FORCE & BIAXIAL MOMENT DESIGN (H1-1b)


    Factor L K1 K2 B1 B2 Cm
    Major Bending 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 0.307
    Minor Bending 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1.

    Lltb Kltb Cb
    LTB 1. 1. 2.218

    Pu phi*Pnc phi*Pnt
    Force Capacity Capacity
    Axial -3503.863 56709.453 99144.

    Mu phi*Mn phi*Mn phi*Mn


    Moment Capacity No LTB Cb=1
    Major Moment 2890.647 10454.4 10454.4 8726.818
    Minor Moment -1.426E-15 2095.2

    SHEAR CHECK
    Vu phi*Vn Stress Status
    Force Capacity Ratio Check
    Major Shear 1560.762 25660.8 0.061 OK
    Minor Shear 1.407E-14 35691.84 0. OK

    CONTINUITY PLATE, DOUBLER PLATE AND BEAM/COLUMN RATIOS


    Cont Pl Dbl Pl BC Ratio BC Ratio
    Area Thick Major Minor
    Joint Design 4.637E-04 0. N/C N/C

    D:\university\master\term 2\Seismic Design\assignment\HW5\Hossein\SAP\401200822-HW5.sdb 5/5/2023 1:48 AM


    results of Emh Project
    Job Number
    Load combination Engineer
    SAP2000
    AISC 360-16 STEEL SECTION CHECK (Summary for Combo and Station)
    Units : Kgf, m, C

    Frame : 2 X Mid: -2.1 Combo: Emh-Nonlin Design Type: Column


    Length: 3.2 Y Mid: -2.1 Shape: IPE270 Frame Type: SMF
    Loc : 3.2 Z Mid: 4.8 Class: Compact Princpl Rot: 0. degrees

    Provision: LRFD Analysis: Direct Analysis


    D/C Limit=0.95 2nd Order: General 2nd Order Reduction: Tau-b Fixed
    AlphaPr/Py=0.038 AlphaPr/Pe=0.05 Tau_b=1. EA factor=0.8 EI factor=0.8

    PhiB=0.9 PhiC=0.9 PhiTY=0.9 PhiTF=0.75


    PhiS=0.9 PhiS-RI=1. PhiST=0.9

    A=0.005 I33=5.790E-05 r33=0.112 S33=4.289E-04 Av3=0.002


    J=1.590E-07 I22=4.200E-06 r22=0.03 S22=6.222E-05 Av2=0.002
    E=2.039E+10 Fy=24000000. Ry=1.2 z33=4.840E-04 Cw=7.087E-08
    RLLF=1. Fu=37000000. z22=9.700E-05

    STRESS CHECK FORCES & MOMENTS (Combo Emh-Nonlin)


    Location Pu Mu33 Mu22 Vu2 Vu3 Tu
    3.2 -4151.036 4551.921 -1.018E-15 -2392.901 -4.250E-14 -2.866E-17

    PMM DEMAND/CAPACITY RATIO (H1-1b)


    D/C Ratio: 0.472 = 0.037 + 0.435 + 0.
    = (1/2)(Pr/Pc) + (Mr33/Mc33) + (Mr22/Mc22)

    COMPACTNESS
    Slenderness Lambda Lambda_p Lambda_r Lambda_s Compactness
    Major/Flange 6.618 11.076 29.147 Compact
    /Web 33.273 109.592 166.137 260. Compact
    Minor/Flange 6.618 11.076 29.147 Compact
    /Web 33.273 109.592 166.137 260. Compact
    Axial/Flange 6.618 16.322 Compact
    /Web 33.273 43.429 Compact

    AXIAL FORCE & BIAXIAL MOMENT DESIGN (H1-1b)


    Factor L K1 K2 B1 B2 Cm
    Major Bending 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 0.322
    Minor Bending 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1.

    Lltb Kltb Cb
    LTB 1. 1. 2.21

    Pu phi*Pnc phi*Pnt
    Force Capacity Capacity
    Axial -4151.036 56709.453 99144.

    Mu phi*Mn phi*Mn phi*Mn


    Moment Capacity No LTB Cb=1
    Major Moment 4551.921 10454.4 10454.4 8726.818
    Minor Moment -1.018E-15 2095.2

    SHEAR CHECK
    Vu phi*Vn Stress Status
    Force Capacity Ratio Check
    Major Shear 2392.901 25660.8 0.093 OK
    Minor Shear 4.250E-14 35691.84 0. OK

    CONTINUITY PLATE, DOUBLER PLATE AND BEAM/COLUMN RATIOS


    Cont Pl Dbl Pl BC Ratio BC Ratio
    Area Thick Major Minor
    Joint Design 4.892E-04 0. N/C N/C

    D:\university\master\term 2\Seismic Design\assignment\HW5\Hossein\SAP\401200822-HW5.sdb 5/5/2023 1:48 AM

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy