Rogelio Bayotas was convicted of rape but died while his conviction was pending appeal. The Supreme Court had to determine if his death extinguished his civil liability. The Court ruled that Bayotas' death extinguished his criminal liability and civil liability based solely on the rape charge, as civil liability is extinguished if the offender dies before final judgment. However, if the victim wishes to recover damages from other potential sources of obligation stemming from the same act, such as quasi-delict, a separate civil action could be filed against the executor of Bayotas' estate.
Rogelio Bayotas was convicted of rape but died while his conviction was pending appeal. The Supreme Court had to determine if his death extinguished his civil liability. The Court ruled that Bayotas' death extinguished his criminal liability and civil liability based solely on the rape charge, as civil liability is extinguished if the offender dies before final judgment. However, if the victim wishes to recover damages from other potential sources of obligation stemming from the same act, such as quasi-delict, a separate civil action could be filed against the executor of Bayotas' estate.
Rogelio Bayotas was convicted of rape but died while his conviction was pending appeal. The Supreme Court had to determine if his death extinguished his civil liability. The Court ruled that Bayotas' death extinguished his criminal liability and civil liability based solely on the rape charge, as civil liability is extinguished if the offender dies before final judgment. However, if the victim wishes to recover damages from other potential sources of obligation stemming from the same act, such as quasi-delict, a separate civil action could be filed against the executor of Bayotas' estate.
Rogelio Bayotas was convicted of rape but died while his conviction was pending appeal. The Supreme Court had to determine if his death extinguished his civil liability. The Court ruled that Bayotas' death extinguished his criminal liability and civil liability based solely on the rape charge, as civil liability is extinguished if the offender dies before final judgment. However, if the victim wishes to recover damages from other potential sources of obligation stemming from the same act, such as quasi-delict, a separate civil action could be filed against the executor of Bayotas' estate.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1
People v Bayotas
G.R. No. 102007
Topic: Delicts Facts: Rogelio Bayotas was charged and eventually convicted with rape on June 19, 1991. Pending appeal of his conviction, Bayotas died on February 4, 1992 at the National Bilibid Hospital due to cardio respiratory arrest. Consequently, the SC dismissed the criminal aspect of the appeal in its Resolution of May 20, 1992. In the Solicitor General’s comment, he expressed his view that the death of accused- appellant did not extinguish his civil liability as a result of his commission of the offense charged. This was opposed by the counsel of the accused-appellant invoking the ruling of the CA in People v Castillo and Ocfemia which held that the civil obligation in a criminal cases takes root in the criminal liability, and, therefore, civil liability is extinguished if accused should die before final judgment is rendered. Issue/s: Whether or not the death of the accused pending appeal of his conviction extinguish his civil liability. Ruling: The death of appellant Bayotas extinguished his criminal liability and the civil liability based solely on the act complained of, i.e., rape. Civil liability is extinguished only when the death of the offender occurs before final judgment. The term final judgment as employed in the RPC means judgment beyond recall. A judgment in a criminal case becomes final “after the lapse of the period for perfecting an appeal or when the sentence has been partially or totally satisfied or served, or the defendant has expressly waived in writing his right to appeal.” It is evident that as jurisprudence evolved from Castillo to Torrijos, the rule established was that the survival of the civil liability depends on whether the same can be predicated on sources of obligations other than delict. If the private offended party, upon extinction of the civil liability ex delicto desires to recover damages from the same act or omission complained of, he must subject to Section 1, Rule 111 file a separate civil action, this time predicated not on the felony previously charged but on other sources of obligation. The source of obligation upon which the separate action is premised determines against whom the same shall be enforced. If the same act or omission complained of also arises from quasi-delict or may, by provision of law, result in an injury to person or property, the separate civil action must be filed against the executor or administrator of the estate of the accused.