Tabaco Accupuncture
Tabaco Accupuncture
Tabaco Accupuncture
Abstract
Background: Acupuncture combined with auricular acupressure has been used as a complementary and alterna‑
tive treatment for smoking cessation in Hong Kong for over 10 years. This study aimed to investigate the success rates
of smoking cessation posttreatment, and to evaluate treatment effects on tobacco dependence, smoking behavior,
anxiety levels, and sleep disturbances between successful and unsuccessful quit smokers in Hong Kong.
Methods: This prospective, multicenter clinical study conducted between September 2020 and February 2022 in
Hong Kong was part of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area project on smoking cessation. Thirty eli‑
gible current smokers (mean age 47.10 years; 40% female) were recruited and received a combination of standardized
acupuncture and auricular acupressure treatments twice weekly for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was the success
rate of smoking cessation at week 24. The secondary outcomes were the success rates of smoking cessation at weeks
8 and 16, exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) levels, and changes in scores on the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Depend‑
ence (FTND), Autonomy Over Smoking Scale (AUTOS), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Self-rating Anxiety
Scale (SAS), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Adverse events were also recorded.
Results: Of 30 eligible participants, 28 completed 6 or more treatment sessions; all completed follow-up assess‑
ments. At week 24, the success rate of smoking cessation was 46.67%. The successfully quit rates at weeks 8 and 16
were 36.67% and 43.33%, respectively. The overall change in mean FTND scores from baseline improved significantly
from weeks 2 to 24 (P < 0.05), with the successful quit group showing significantly greater improvement between
weeks 8 and 24 (P < 0.01). Compared with baseline values, there were significant reductions in mean AUTOS scores
from weeks 6 to 24 (P < 0.001), with the successful quit group showing greater improvement at weeks 16 (P = 0.04)
and 24 (P < 0.001). No significant changes were detected in exhaled CO levels or HAM-A, SAS, and PSQI scores. No
study-related adverse events were observed.
*Correspondence: holaifun@gmail.com
1
Chinese Medicine Services, Pok Oi Hospital, G/F, Shatin (Taiwai) Clinic, 2 Man
Lai Road, Taiwai, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong, SAR, China
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
© The Author(s) 2022. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which
permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the
original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or
other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line
to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory
regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this
licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativeco
mmons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Ho et al. Chinese Medicine (2022) 17:92 Page 2 of 12
Conclusions: Acupuncture combined with auricular acupressure could be an effective alternative treatment for
smoking cessation and reduction of tobacco dependence among Hong Kong smokers.
Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, No. ChiCTR2000033650. Registered on June 7, 2020. http://www.chictr.
org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=54866
Keywords: Acupuncture, Auricular acupressure, Clinical trial, Smoking cessation, Tobacco dependence
combined with auricular acupressure treatments. In (8) had a history of smoking cessation treatments, such as
addition, we evaluated changes in tobacco dependence, acupuncture, auricular acupressure, or nicotine replace-
smoking behavior, anxiety levels, and sleep disturbances ment therapy, within the previous month.
between successful and unsuccessful quit smokers. After eligibility assessment by the research team, the
participants were enrolled and underwent baseline pre-
Methods treatment evaluations. Routine biochemical and hema-
Study design and setting tological tests and electrocardiography were performed
This prospective, multicenter, open-label clinical study before treatment administration.
was conducted between September 24, 2020, and Feb-
ruary 22, 2022. The trial sites included Pok Oi Hospital‒
The Chinese University of Hong Kong Chinese Medicine Intervention
Clinic cum Training and Research Centre (Shatin Dis- All participants received standardized acupuncture and
trict), and two community-based mobile clinics. The trial auricular acupressure treatments twice weekly for 8
consisted of 8 weeks of treatment and 16 weeks of follow- consecutive weeks. The treatments were performed by
up (an 8-week treatment period with follow-up at weeks Hong Kong Registered Chinese Medicine Practitioners
16 and 24). The trial was approved by the Joint Chinese who had over 3 years of practice experience and received
University of Hong Kong‒New Territories East Cluster training to execute standard protocol procedures prior to
Clinical Research Ethics Committee (No. 2020.116) and study initiation. The treatment protocol was developed
registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. based on the neural mechanism of acupuncture [6, 7],
ChiCTR2000033650). The trial adhered to the Declara- previous clinical studies [19, 20], and the clinical experi-
tion of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. ence of acupuncture experts.
The study was conducted in accordance with the STand- For acupuncture treatments, the acupoints Baihui
ards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of (GV20), Yintang (GV29), bilateral Lieque (LU7), and
Acupuncture recommendations [17]. All participants bilateral Hegu (LI4) [21, 22] were used based on the
provided written informed consent prior to participation. methodology of an earlier smoking cessation study [20].
Treatments were provided free, and no subjects were During each treatment session, the participants were
paid for their participation. in a supine position exposing the acupoints. After skin
disinfection, sterile, single-use acupuncture needles
Participants (0.25 mm × 25/40 mm; Suzhou Medical Appliance Fac-
Current smokers who wanted to quit smoking were tory, Suzhou, China) were inserted obliquely into GV20
recruited and underwent eligibility assessment by cross- (depth, 0.8–1.0 cun) and bilateral LU7 (depth, 0.5–1.0
referral from all Chinese medicine service units under cun until it reached Yangxi [LI5]), inserted transversely
the management of Pok Oi Hospital (covering all districts into GV29 (depth, 0.8 cun), and inserted perpendicularly
in Hong Kong) between September 2020 and August into bilateral LI4 (depth, 0.5–0.8 cun). The needles were
2021. manipulated using the lifting and thrusting method [23]
Eligible participants had to meet the following inclu- until deqi sensation [24] was achieved for each acupoint
sion criteria: (1) voluntarily quit smoking; (2) aged whenever possible, and retained in situ for 30 min before
18‒65 years; (3) smoked for ≥ 1 year; (4) consumed ≥ 20 removal. During retention, the needles were manipulated
cigarettes per day in the previous year; (5) positive sali- by lifting and thrusting 20 times every 10 min.
vary cotinine test; (6) nicotine dependence score (Fager- Auricular acupressure was administered unilaterally,
ström Test for Nicotine Dependence, FTND [18]) of ≥ 4 alternating between the left and right ear in each treat-
points; (7) provided written informed consent and vol- ment session. The auricular acupoints used were Shen-
unteered to participate; and (8) undergone a washout men (TF4), Fei (CO14), Wei (CO4), Neifenmi (CO18),
period of more than 1 month if other smoking cessation Pizhixia (AT4), Jiaogan ( AH6a), and Kou ( CO1) [25]. After
treatments were previously conducted. skin disinfection, Vaccariae seeds (Wang Bu Liu Xing)
Participants were excluded if they: (1) had severe and 2 mm in diameter were adhered with adhesive tape to the
unstable cardiac, pulmonary, cerebral, or hematologic surface of the 7 auricular acupoints and maintained for
diseases or diabetes with other complications; (2) had 3 days. Participants were instructed to press each auricu-
mental illness or drug abuse; (3) had apoplexy or other lar acupoint via the central plastered seed 3–5 times per
nervous system diseases; (4) had unknown diseases; (5) day for 30–60 s.
had blood coagulation disturbances or were undergoing During the study period, the research team advised
treatment with anticoagulant drugs; (6) had moderate or each participant to avoid any other treatments for smok-
severe liver or kidney impairment; (7) were pregnant; or ing cessation but to continue medications for diseases
Ho et al. Chinese Medicine (2022) 17:92 Page 4 of 12
such as hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and coro- We used the statistical package IBM SPSS Statistics
nary heart disease. version 27.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) for conduct-
ing statistical analyses, and all participants’ data were
included. Analyses were performed by a statistician not
Outcome measures involved in treatment provision or data collection. All
Evaluations in this study were performed at baseline and statistical tests were two-sided, with a significance level
at weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8 after the start of treatment and of 0.05.
again at weeks 16 and 24 when follow-up was performed. To analyze the data, appropriate parametric or non-
The primary outcome measure was the success rate parametric statistical tests were used in accordance with
of smoking cessation at week 24. Success was defined the nature of the data. Baseline participant characteris-
as self-reported quitting and verified by an exhaled CO tics were reported as mean and standard deviation for
level < 10 parts per million (ppm) within 24 h of self- continuous variables and as count and percentage for cat-
reported abstinence, measured using CO Check Pro (MD egorical variables.
Diagnostics Ltd, Chatham, UK), and a negative test result To investigate changes in the mean scores for all con-
for salivary cotinine, measured using the Oral Fluid Coti- tinuous outcome variables from baseline to week 24,
nine Test Mini Cube (TestCountry, San Diego, CA, USA). linear mixed-effects model (LMM) analyses were con-
Secondary outcomes were the success rates of smok- ducted. The fundamental assumptions of the LMM
ing cessation at weeks 8 and 16, exhaled CO levels at each (including normality, validity of the model, and inde-
evaluation time point, efficacy indicators of the FTND pendence of data points) were tested to ensure the accu-
and Autonomy Over Smoking Scale (AUTOS) at each racy of the test results.
evaluation time point, and scale evaluations of the Ham- The overall and individual group changes for each
ilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Self-rating Anxiety continuous outcome from baseline across all measure-
Scale (SAS), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at ment points were analyzed using LMM analyses. In
each evaluation time point. The FTND (score, 0–10) is a addition, LMM analyses were performed to compare
validated 6-item instrument devised to evaluate the num- treatment effects between the successful and unsuccess-
ber and strength of cigarettes smoked as well as smok- ful quit groups across all study time points from baseline
ing behavior, with higher scores indicating higher levels to week 24 (group-by-time interaction effects). Post-hoc
of nicotine dependence [18]. AUTOS (score, 0–36) is a between-group and within-group differences were com-
validated 12-item theory-based instrument with three puted using the Bonferroni adjustment for multiple com-
subscales to assess withdrawal symptoms, psychological parisons (six time points).
dependence, and cue-induced craving [26, 27]. HAM-A Furthermore, binary logistic regression was adopted
(score, 0–56) is a validated 14-item (symptom-defined to analyse the relationship between a series of baseline
elements) clinician-rated instrument for quantifying characteristics that could act as possible predictors and
anxiety symptoms, with higher scores indicating greater the success rate of smoking cessation at week 24 and was
symptom severity [28, 29]. The SAS (index, 25–100) is a reported as odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (OR
validated 20-item rating instrument for anxiety disorders, and 95% CI). Adverse events and additional information
with higher scores indicating greater anxiety [30]. PSQI were descriptively analyzed and reported.
(score, 0–21) is a validated 19-item self-rated question-
naire for assessing sleep quality and disturbances, with
higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality [31]. Possi- Results
ble predictors for smoking cessation were evaluated, and Participant flow and baseline characteristics
all adverse events or reactions were monitored, appro- From September 2020 to August 2021, a total of 33 cur-
priately managed, and recorded throughout the study rent smokers who expressed interest in the study were
period. screened. Of these 33 smokers, 3 declined participation
before the start of treatment. The remaining 30 par-
ticipants were enrolled and treated; none were lost to
Statistical analysis follow-up. Of these 30 participants, 15 completed all 16
This study was part of the Guangdong-Hong Kong- treatment sessions, and only 2 received less than 6 treat-
Macau Greater Bay Area Smoking Cessation Project, and ment sessions. All pretreatment salivary cotinine test
the Hong Kong site was assigned to recruit 30 subjects. results were positive. The study flowchart is shown in
Therefore, no additional formal sample size calculations Fig. 1.
were performed. This sample size is similar to that rec- The demographic and clinical characteristics of
ommended by previous research on sample size determi- the participants are presented in Table 1. All partici-
nation for pilot trials [32]. pants were Chinese, 40.00% were female, and 76.67%
Ho et al. Chinese Medicine (2022) 17:92 Page 5 of 12
were aged 40 years and above. The mean age was those who successfully quit smoking had a lower level of
47.10 ± 10.74 years, and most participants were between exhaled CO before treatment.
40 and 49 years old (43.33%). The mean duration of
smoking was 24.10 ± 11.43 years, and 70.00% of the par-
ticipants smoked at least 10 cigarettes per day. In addi- Primary outcome
tion, 46.67% of participants had tried to quit smoking in Regarding the primary outcome, the success rate of
the past. The mean scores for FTND and AUTOS were smoking cessation at week 24 was 46.67% (Fig. 2). Thir-
5.06 ± 1.87 and 19.33 ± 7.99, respectively. Moreover, we teen out of the 14 participants who successfully quit
presented the baseline data of participants by categoriz- smoking attended 6 or more treatment sessions. Among
ing them into successful and unsuccessful quit smokers those who did not quit smoking (n = 16), 11 (68.75%)
(based on smoking cessation at week 24). The baseline reported a reduction in the number of cigarettes smoked
characteristics of the two groups were similar, except that per day at week 24.
Table 1 Baseline participant characteristics
Characteristic Total (n = 30) Successful Quit (n = 14) Unsuccessful Quit (n = 16) P value
Table 1 (continued)
Characteristic Total (n = 30) Successful Quit (n = 14) Unsuccessful Quit (n = 16) P value
AUTOS
Withdrawal symptoms 6.33 ± 3.20 6.78 ± 2.75 5.93 ± 3.60 0.48
Psychological dependence 5.83 ± 3.20 6.35 ± 3.20 5.37 ± 3.24 0.41
Cue-induced craving 7.16 ± 2.50 7.85 ± 2.31 6.56 ± 2.58 0.16
Total 19.33 ± 7.99 21.00 ± 7.53 17.87 ± 8.34 0.29
HAM-A 16.06 ± 9.02 18.85 ± 9.33 13.62 ± 8.26 0.11
SAS 50.80 ± 7.82 50.92 ± 8.84 50.68 ± 7.10 0.93
PSQI 7.43 ± 4.05 7.35 ± 4.03 7.50 ± 4.21 0.92
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or as number (%)
CO, carbon monoxide; ppm, parts per million; FTND, Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence; AUTOS, Autonomy Over Smoking Scale; HAM-A, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale; SAS, Self-rating Anxiety Scale; PSQI,
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
*One participant in the unsuccessful quit group used electronic cigarettes
Page 7 of 12
Ho et al. Chinese Medicine (2022) 17:92 Page 8 of 12
Table 2 Change from baseline for secondary outcome measures at different time points
Outcome Total P valuea Successful Quit (n = 14) Unsuccessful Quit (n = 16) P valueb
FTND
Week 2 − 0.80 (− 3.51 to − 0.08) 0.03 − 2.57 (− 5.44 to 0.30) − 1.12 (− 3.27 to 1.02) 0.18
Week 4 − 2.06 (− 3.77 to − 0.35) 0.006 − 3.07 (− 6.01 to − 0.12)* − 1.18 (− 3.17 to 0.79) 0.06
Week 6 − 2.50 (− 4.16 to − 0.84) < 0.001 − 3.35 (− 6.21 to − 0.50)* − 1.75 (− 3.70 to 0.20) 0.08
Week 8 − 2.73 (− 4.49 to − 0.97) < 0.001 − 4.35 (− 6.98 to − 1.72)‡ − 1.31 (− 3.48 to 0.85) 0.006
Week 16 − 2.73 (− 4.51 to − 0.95) < 0.001 − 4.42 (− 7.02 to − 1.83)‡ − 1.25 (− 3.44 to 0.94) 0.004
Week 24 − 2.76 (− 4.48 to − 1.05) < 0.001 − 4.78 (− 7.04 to − 2.52)‡ − 1.00 (− 3.05 to 1.05) < 0.001
AUTOS
Week 2 − 3.30 (− 9.83 to 3.23) 1.00 − 4.85 (− 14.43 to 4.72) − 1.93 (− 11.18 to 7.31) 0.90
Week 4 − 5.83 (− 12.22 to 0.55) 0.11 − 9.07 (− 18.80 to 0.65) − 3.00 (− 11.74 to 5.74) 0.10
Week 6 − 8.93 (− 14.82 to − 3.04) < 0.001 − 12.14 (− 21.65 to − 2.62)† − 6.12 (− 13.62 to 1.37) 0.24
Week 8 − 10.73 (− 16.55 to − 4.91) < 0.001 − 14.00 (− 23.48 to − 4.51)† − 7.87 (− 15.54 to − 0.20)* 0.46
‡
Week 16 − 12.56 (− 18.10 to − 7.02) < 0.001 − 17.50 (− 25.99 to − 9.00) − 8.25 (− 15.71 to − 0.78)* 0.04
Week 24 − 13.03 (− 19.10 to − 6.96) < 0.001 − 20.28 (− 27.89 to − 12.67)‡ − 6.68 (− 15.09 to 1.72) < 0.001
HAM− A
Week 2 − 0.86 (− 8.64 to 6.91) 1.00 − 2.00 (− 13.48 to 9.48) 0.12 (− 10.29 to 10.54) 0.40
Week 4 − 4.13 (− 11.69 to 3.42) 1.00 − 5.78 (− 17.48 to 5.91) − 2.68 (− 12.35 to 6.97) 0.60
Week 6 − 6.20 (− 13.54 to 1.14) 0.20 − 7.14 (− 19.51 to 5.23) − 5.37 (− 13.85 to 3.10) 0.55
Week 8 − 6.53 (− 13.82 to 0.75) 0.12 − 8.14 (− 20.17 to 3.89) − 5.12 (− 14.00 to 3.75) 0.80
Week 16 − 4.96 (− 12.13 to 2.20) 0.66 − 6.07 (− 17.98 to 5.84) − 4.00 (− 12.62 to 4.62) 0.36
Week 24 − 5.80 (− 13.08 to 1.48) 0.29 − 9.14 (− 20.44 to 2.15) − 2.87 (− 12.80 to 7.05) 0.97
SAS
Week 2 − 2.40 (− 8.61 to 3.81) 1.00 − 1.00 (− 11.45 to 9.45) − 3.62 (− 11.52 to 4.27) 0.23
Week 4 − 4.16 (− 9.97 to 1.64) 0.55 − 3.28 (− 13.06 to 6.48) − 4.93 (− 12.41 to 2.54) 0.26
Week 6 − 3.60 (− 8.82 to 1.62) 0.66 − 3.21 (− 12.43 to 6.01) − 3.93 (− 10.54 to 2.67) 0.47
Week 8 − 5.03 (− 10.95 to 0.89) 0.19 − 5.57 (− 16.06 to 4.92) − 4.56 (− 11.92 to 2.79) 0.86
Week 16 − 3.66 (− 8.99 to 1.65) 0.67 − 3.00 (− 12.28 to 6.28) − 4.25 (− 11.06 to 2.56) 0.27
Week 24 − 2.33 (− 7.58 to 2.91) 1.00 − 1.71 (− 10.77 to 7.34) − 2.87 (− 9.71 to 3.96) 0.37
PSQI
Week 2 − 0.80 (− 3.79 to 2.19) 1.00 − 1.00 (− 5.66 to 3.66) − 0.62 (− 4.70 to 3.45) 0.64
Week 4 − 1.26 (− 4.43 to 1.90) 1.00 − 1.57 (− 6.56 to 3.41) − 1.00 (− 5.38 to 3.38) 0.52
Week 6 − 1.53 (− 4.69 to 1.62) 1.00 − 1.85 (− 6.76 to 3.05) − 1.25 (− 5.62 to 3.12) 0.44
Week 8 − 1.60 (− 4.68 to 1.48) 1.00 − 1.85 (− 6.61 to 2.89) − 1.37 (− 5.67 to 2.92) 0.41
Week 16 − 1.53 (− 4.75 to 1.68) 1.00 − 2.00 (− 6.91 to 2.91) − 1.12 (− 5.70 to 3.45) 0.45
Week 24 − 1.66 (− 5.06 to 1.73) 1.00 − 2.85 (− 7.64 to 1.93) − 0.62 (− 5.61 to 4.36) 0.14
Data are presented as estimated mean (95% CI) from the linear mixed-effects model
FTND, Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence; AUTOS, Autonomy Over Smoking Scale; HAM-A, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale; SAS, Self-rating Anxiety Scale; PSQI,
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
a
P values were calculated using a linear mixed-effects model to illustrate pre- and posttreatment differences
b
P values were calculated using a linear mixed-effects model to illustrate between-group differences
*
P < 0.05, compared with pretreatment within-group
†
P < 0.01, compared with pretreatment within-group
‡
P < 0.001, compared with pretreatment within-group
reported in our results showed the positive therapeutic Although no significant changes were found in these
effects of acupuncture on tobacco dependence in smok- scores, our study still provided preliminary insight into
ers. Furthermore, HAM-A is a reliable and valid anxiety the effects of combined acupuncture and auricular acu-
evaluation questionnaire, and SAS is a rating instrument pressure on smokers’ anxiety status and sleep quality.
for measuring anxiety disorders, while PSQI provides Our study also has several limitations. This was a
a standardized, quantitative measure of sleep quality. single-arm clinical trial without control group, which
Ho et al. Chinese Medicine (2022) 17:92 Page 11 of 12
Abbreviations
CO: Carbon monoxide; ppm: Parts per million; FTND: Fagerström Test for
Nicotine Dependence; AUTOS: Autonomy Over Smoking Scale; HAM-A:
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale; SAS: Self-rating Anxiety Scale; PSQI: Pittsburgh
Sleep Quality Index; LMM: Linear mixed-effects model; OR: Odds ratio; CI:
Confidence interval.
Acknowledgements
We thank all participants for their contributions to the study. We also thank
the Hospital Authority Chinese Medicine Department of Hong Kong for their
expert advice and monitoring of the trial’s progress.
Author contributions
LFH, WKH, GHL, and ZXL conceived and contributed to the study design. LFH,
WKH, and KLC obtained ethical approval. MC, GHL, BN, and ZXL supervised the
study. LFH and WKH contributed to the study collaboration. LLW, ZWC, SYT,
CMW, KSC, and CLL participated in clinical treatment and data collection. LFH
Fig. 5 Changes in mean AUTOS scores over time. AUTOS, and WKH were responsible for data management and analysis. LFH drafted
Autonomy Over Smoking Scale; Wk, Week. * denotes a significant the manuscript. MC, KLC, BN, and ZXL reviewed the manuscript. All authors
between-group difference; # denotes a significant within-group read and approved the final manuscript.
difference compared with the pretreatment value
Funding
This study was supported and funded by the reserve of Pok Oi Hospital‒The
Chinese University of Hong Kong Chinese Medicine Clinic cum Training and
affected the quality of our study design and results. All Research Centre (Shatin District). Funding played no role in the study design,
30 smokers in our study received combined acupunc- collection, management, or analysis, nor in the interpretation of the data, writ‑
ing of the report, or decision to submit the report for publication.
ture and auricular acupressure treatments, and no con-
trols were used for comparison. This small and relatively Availability of data and materials
homogenous sample size may prevent the extrapolation The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from
the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
of the findings and may be insufficient to generate pre-
cise results. Further large-scale, high-quality randomized
controlled trials with proper comparison groups are war- Declarations
ranted to verify our findings. In addition, we investigated Ethics approval and consent to participate
the therapeutic effects of combined acupuncture and This study was reviewed and approved by the Joint Chinese University of
Hong Kong‒New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee
auricular acupressure for smoking cessation in moderate (CREC Ref. No. 2020.116) in April 2020. Written informed consent was obtained
and heavy smokers. Future studies focusing on light and from all participants.
intermittent smokers would be useful since light smok-
Consent for publication
ing also carries substantial health risks [39]. Moreover, Not applicable.
our follow-up period was only up to week 24. A longer
follow-up period will provide more insights into the Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
therapeutic effects of combined acupuncture and auricu-
lar acupressure for long-term smoking cessation, help- Author details
ing smokers to maintain a longer-term or even life-long 1
Chinese Medicine Services, Pok Oi Hospital, G/F, Shatin (Taiwai) Clinic, 2 Man
Lai Road, Taiwai, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong, SAR, China. 2 School of Chinese Medi‑
smoke-free life. Therefore, more research is required to cine, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong,
verify the exact role of acupuncture and auricular acu- SAR, China. 3 Hong Kong Institute of Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine,
pressure treatments for smoking cessation and to provide The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China. 4 The First Affili‑
ated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
more robust and precise scientific evidence. 5
Chinese Medicine Department, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396:1223–49. https:// 23. World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific. WHO
doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2. international standard terminologies on traditional medicine in the
4. West R. Tobacco smoking: health impact, prevalence, correlates and inter‑ Western Pacific Region. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/206952.
ventions. Psychol Health. 2017;32:1018–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870 Accessed 22 Feb 2022.
446.2017.1325890. 24. Yang XY, Shi GX, Li QQ, Zhang ZH, Xu Q, Liu CZ. Characterization of deqi
5. Livingstone-Banks J, Lindson N, Hartmann-Boyce J, Aveyard P. Effects of sensation and acupuncture effect. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med.
interventions to combat tobacco addiction: Cochrane update of 2019 2013;2013: 319734. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/319734.
and 2020 reviews. Addiction. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15769. 25. Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. GB/T
6. Kang OS, Kim SY, Jahng GH, Kim H, Kim JW, Chung SY, et al. Neural substrates 13734–2008 Nomenclature and location of auricular points. https://openstd.
of acupuncture in the modulation of cravings induced by smoking-related samr.gov.cn/bzgk/gb/newGbInfo?hcno=D6A125ED4011A9A625F8A3ACE
visual cues: an fMRI study. Psychopharmacology. 2013;228:119–27. https://doi. 425EE09. Accessed 6 Mar 2020. [In Chinese]
org/10.1007/s00213-013-3015-y. 26. DiFranza JR, Wellman RJ, Ursprung WW, Sabiston C. The autonomy over smok‑
7. Wang YY, Liu Z, Chen F, Sun L, Wu Y, Yang JS, et al. Effects of acupuncture ing scale. Psychol Addict Behav. 2009;23:656–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/
on craving after tobacco cessation: a resting-state fMRI study based on the a0017439.
fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 27. DiFranza JR, Savageau JA, Wellman RJ. A comparison of the autonomy over
2019;9:1118–25. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims.2019.06.07. tobacco scale and the Fagerström test for nicotine dependence. Addict Behav.
8. Ma E, Chan T, Zhang O, Yang JS, Wang YY, Li YC, et al. Effectiveness of acupunc‑ 2012;37:856–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.03.013.
ture for smoking cessation in a Chinese population. Asia Pac J Public Health. 28. Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol.
2015;27:2610–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539513503867. 1959;32:50–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1959.tb00467.x.
9. Wang YY, Liu Z, Wu Y, Yang L, Guo LT, Zhang HB, et al. Efficacy of acupuncture 29. Maier W, Buller R, Philipp M, Heuser I. The Hamilton Anxiety Scale: reliability,
is noninferior to nicotine replacement therapy for tobacco cessation: results validity and sensitivity to change in anxiety and depressive disorders. J Affect
of a prospective, randomized, active-controlled open-label trial. Chest. Disord. 1988;14:61–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0327(88)90072-9.
2018;153:680–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2017.11.015. 30. Zung WW. A rating instrument for anxiety disorders. Psychosomatics.
10. He D, Medbø JI, Høstmark AT. Effect of acupuncture on smoking cessation or 1971;12:371–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3182(71)71479-0.
reduction: an 8-month and 5-year follow-up study. Prev Med. 2001;33:364–72. 31. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh
https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.2001.0901. Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research.
11. McFadden DD, Chon TY, Croghan IT, Schroeder DR, Mallory MJ, Ebbert JO, et al. Psychiatry Res. 1989;28:193–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(89)
Trial of intensive acupuncture for smoking cessation: a pilot study. Acupunct 90047-4.
Med. 2015;33:375–80. https://doi.org/10.1136/acupmed-2015-010794. 32. Browne RH. On the use of a pilot sample for sample size determination. Stat
12. Wang YY, Liu Z, Wu Y, Zhang O, Chen M, Huang LL, et al. Acupuncture for Med. 1995;14:1933–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780141709.
smoking cessation in Hong Kong: a prospective multicenter observational 33. Liu Z, Yang JS, Wu Y, Zhang O, Chen M, Huang LL, et al. Predictors for smoking
study. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2016;2016:2865831. https://doi. cessation with acupuncture in a Hong Kong population. Evid Based Comple‑
org/10.1155/2016/2865831. ment Alternat Med. 2015;2015: 189694. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/189694.
13. Zhang YY, Yu ZY, Lan HD, Liang SB, Fang M, Robinson N, et al. Non-traditional 34. Shie HG, Pan SW, Yu WK, Chen WC, Ho LI, Ko HK. Levels of exhaled carbon
acupuncture therapies for smoking cessation: a systematic review of rand‑ monoxide measured during an intervention program predict 1-year smoking
omized controlled trials. Eur J Integr Med. 2021;47: 101390. https://doi.org/10. cessation: a retrospective observational cohort study. NPJ Prim Care Respir
1016/j.eujim.2021.101390. Med. 2017;27:59. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-017-0060-8.
14. Di YM, May BH, Zhang AL, Zhou IW, Worsnop C, Xue CC. A meta-analysis of 35. Bilici M, Güven S, Köşker S, Şafak A, Semiz ÜB. Electroacupuncture therapy in
ear-acupuncture, ear-acupressure and auriculotherapy for cigarette smoking nicotine dependence: a double blind, sham-controlled study. Noro Psikiyatr
cessation. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;142:14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. Ars. 2016;53:28–32. https://doi.org/10.5152/npa.2015.9887.
drugalcdep.2014.07.002. 36. Bier ID, Wilson J, Studt P, Shakleton M. Auricular acupuncture, education, and
15. Wang JH, van Haselen R, Wang M, Yang GL, Zhang Z, Friedrich ME, et al. smoking cessation: a randomized, sham-controlled trial. Am J Public Health.
Acupuncture for smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 2002;92:1642–7. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.92.10.1642.
24 randomized controlled trials. Tob Induc Dis. 2019;17:48. https://doi.org/10. 37. Deveci SE, Deveci F, Açik Y, Ozan AT. The measurement of exhaled carbon
18332/tid/109195. monoxide in healthy smokers and non-smokers. Respir Med. 2004;98:551–6.
16. Dai R, Cao Y, Zhang H, Zhao N, Ren D, Jiang X, et al. Comparison between https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2003.11.018.
acupuncture and nicotine replacement therapies for smoking cessa‑ 38. Raja M, Garg A, Yadav P, Jha K, Handa S. Diagnostic methods for detection
tion based on randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and of cotinine level in tobacco users: a review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10:04–6.
Bayesian network meta-analysis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/17360.7423.
2021;2021:9997516. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9997516. 39. Schane RE, Ling PM, Glantz SA. Health effects of light and intermittent smok‑
17. MacPherson H, Altman DG, Hammerschlag R, Li Y, Wu T, White A, et al. ing: a review. Circulation. 2010;121:1518–22. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCU
Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acu‑ LATIONAHA.109.904235.
puncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement. Acupunct Med.
2010;28:83–93. https://doi.org/10.1136/aim.2009.001370.
18. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerström KO. The Fagerström Publisher’s Note
Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in pub‑
Questionnaire. Br J Addict. 1991;86:1119–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j. lished maps and institutional affiliations.
1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x.
19. Liu Z, Wang YY, Wu Y, Zhang F, Qi SL, Yang JS. Modern literature study on
smoking cessation with acupuncture. J Tradit Chin Med. 2015;56:2116–
20. https://doi.org/10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2015.24.012.[InChinese].
20. Zhang FF, Wang YY, Liu C, Wu Y, Yang JS. Analysis of acupuncture point
selection for smoking cessation with acupuncture. Shanghai J Acu-mox.
2016;35:230–2. https://doi.org/10.13460/j.issn.1005-0957.2016.02.0230.
21. Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. GB/T
12346–2006. Nomenclature and location of acupuncture points. https://
openstd.samr.gov.cn/bzgk/gb/newGbInfo?hcno=66FB7D61A6999FF
D9ED9701178228E0A. Accessed 6 Mar 2020. [In Chinese]
22. World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific. WHO
standard acupuncture point locations in the Western Pacific region.
https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/353407. Accessed 22 Feb 2022.