Role and Purpose of Education: Ociology Actsheet
Role and Purpose of Education: Ociology Actsheet
Role and Purpose of Education: Ociology Actsheet
uk
Sociology Factsheet
Number 43
Activity
What do you think the purpose of education is? Formal education provides students opportunities to learn though the official curriculum, which includes all the subjects studied in lessons e.g. maths, English. Informal education provides students with the opportunity to learn outside the classroom. The hidden curriculum generally involves learning rules, routines and regulations. Students may learn these things without necessarily realising they are learning them.
Exam Hint:You may be asked to explain terminology such as hidden curriculum Make sure you know key terms and can explain them. Chief Examiners comment that it is important to read these questions carefully. You may be asked to define/ describe a term (e.g. hidden curriculum) or you may be asked to explain the function of . Make sure you answer these questions appropriately.
Evidence
In Leaning to Labour :How working class Kids Get Working Class jobs, Paul Willis studied a group of 12 working class boys (the lads) during their last year and a half at school and their first few months at work. He found the lads rejected school and created their own counter school culture. However, this very rejection of school prepared them for the low skilled low status jobs they were to take.The lads rejected educational success as defined by the school. Boredom at school was relieved by mucking around and breaking rules, also preparing them for boredom in work.
Role of Education
Different sociological approaches have different views on the role of education in society: Functionalist sociologists examine institutions in terms of the positive role they play in society as a whole. For functionalists, education is seen as performing a beneficial role in society. Marxist sociologists examine society in terms of the struggle between powerful and less powerful groups. They argue that the powerful groups in society use the education system to impose their own beliefs and values on the rest of society. From this point of view, education seems to have a beneficial role only for certain groups Interpretive approaches focus on small scale interaction. They examine the meanings and the consequences of those meanings for education.
Interpretive Approach
Interpretative sociologists argue that pupils preparation for the world of work in affected by teacher expectations.
Evidence
Rosenthal and Jacobson (1968) examined the effects of teachers definitions of pupils. They told teachers in an elementary school in California that they had identified a number of pupils (labelled the spurters) as likely to make rapid progress. Unknown to the teachers, these children had been selected at random. A year later, the spurters made greater progress than their classmates and Rosenthal and Jacobson concluded that this was due to the way they had been labelled. Teachers expected more from them, conveyed their expectations to them and they acted in terms of it. These pupils were more prepared for the higher positions in the world of work than those who were not expected to achieve.
www.curriculum-press.co.uk
Sociology Factsheet
Evidence
Talcott Parsons saw the school as a bridge between the family and wider society. Within the family the childs status is ascribed fixed a birth. In wider society status is achieved. Adults achieve their status as bricklayers, doctors, clerks, teachers etc on the basis of ability and effort. Parsons further believes that schools help to select young people and allocate them to adult roles. Pupils are assessed and sorted in terms of their talents and abilities and this helps to allocate them to appropriate occupations. Marxists do not believe the education system provides equal opportunities for everyone. They argue that it is designed to benefit the powerful groups. They claim that both teachers and schools reject working class children and that working class children therefore underperform. Marxists do not see the education system as meritocratic because it does not offer an equal opportunity to all groups in society.
Interpretive approaches argue that pupils are constantly being assessed and classified. On the basis of this they are defined as able or less able, placed in particular sets or streams, entered for particular examinations and given or denied access to certain parts of the school curriculum. Teachers are more likely to define middle rather than working class pupils as able, good students and well behaved. This may well disadvantage working class pupils. A label is a major identifying characteristic. If for example, a pupil is labelled bright, others will respond to this pupil and interpret their actions in terms of this label. There is a tendency for a selffulfilling prophecy to result. The pupil will act in terms of the label and see themselves as bright (so fulfilling the prophecy others have made)
Evidence
Becker (1977) interviewed 60 Chicago teachers and found they tended to share a picture of the ideal pupil. This was used as a benchmark to judge the pupils they taught. The ideal pupil was highly motivated, intelligent and well behaved. Pupils judged to be closest to this ideal were likely to come from middle class backgrounds, those furthest from it from lower working class backgrounds. As a result this group were labelled as discipline problems, as unmotivated as unlikely to succeed. These labels may have a significant effect on their education and on their future jobs.
Evidence
Findings from Douglas provides support for Cultural Deprivation Theory. This theory states that those at the bottom of the class system are deprived of certain values, attitudes and skills which are required for educational success. They begin school deprived of many of the qualities needed to do well. The effect of this disadvantage is cumulative it grows as the child moves through the education system. They lack ambition and motivation and become fatalistic they accept the situation rather than trying to improve it. This can lead to the self-fulfilling prophecy. Interpretive Approach emphasises the importance of a socially constructed identity. This identity is shaped partly by peoples perceptions of how others see them. There is a tendency for people to act in terms of the image of themselves which others project. This can lead to the self-fulfilling prophecy.
Evidence
Beynon (1985) examined how boys classified and evaluated each other during their first three months of secondary school. Their classification included good kids (who stood up to the teachers), TPs (teachers pets), bullies, dippoes or weirds and snobs and toffees. On the basis of these and other categories the boys formed friendship groups. Social classifications are important as they define what a person is and what others think about and expect from them
www.curriculum-press.co.uk
Sociology Factsheet
Evidence
Bowles and Gintis (1976) argue the correspondence between school and the workplace effectively reproduces labour power from one generation to the next. Schools, like wider society are based on hierarchies. Teachers give orders, pupils are expected to obey. Pupils have little control over their work or over the curriculum they follow. This corresponds to their later experience of lack of control in the workplace. Schools reward punctuality, obedience and hard work. This is directly in line with the requirements of employers in capitalist society. Interpretive approaches can be explained in terms of teachers and pupils negotiating a working consensus in the classroom. Each attempts to define and control classroom interaction. Teachers use a range of tactics including providing rewards and punishments to pupils. They use tales of what happened to previous students as warnings to their current pupils. Teachers are in a more powerful position than pupils they have formal authority which is backed up by sanctions. However, pupils have ways of influencing the actions of teachers. Hargreaves (1975) argues that the order in the classroom is a negotiated order based on a consensus worked out between teacher and pupils.
Test yourself!
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. What are the main roles of the Education System? How would Functionalist explain the purpose of education? Chose one role of education and describe how functionalists would explain this role of education How would Marxists explain the purpose of education? Chose one role of education and describe how Marxists would explain this role of education How would interpretive approach explain the purpose of education Chose one role of education and describe how the interpretive approach would explain this role of education Explain how one political perspective would explain the role of education
Acknowledgements: This Sociology Factsheet was researched and written by Rosie Owens. Curriculum Press. Bank House, 105 King Street, Wellington, TF1 1NU. Sociology Factsheets may be copied free of charge by teaching staff or students, provided that their school is a registered subscriber. No part of these Factsheets may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any other form or by any other means, without the prior permission of the publisher. ISSN 1351-5136