Human Right
Human Right
Human Right
Unit-I
Qs. Ancient Indian Perspective
Ans. Broadly speaking human right may be regarded as those fundamental right
which are essential for the life as human being. Human rights are the rights which
are possessed by every human being irrespective of his/her nationality, race,
religion, sex etc. Human rights are thus those rights which are inherent in our
nature and without which we cannot live as human being.
Definition of Human Right
According to Protection of Human right Act 1993 section 2(d)—
“Human right is the right related to the life, liberty, equality and dignity of the
individual guaranteed by the constitution or embodied in the international
covenants and enforceable by the courts in India.”
On the basis of above definition the meaning of human rights are-
1. Which are necessary for maintaining human dignity or for leading a
dignified life.
2. Which are necessary for physical, mental, and intellectual development of
individual.
3. Which are included in the international covenants and convention.
4. Which are protected by the Indian constitution and enforceable by the courts
in India.
Ancient Indian Perspective
Despite the scarcity of the information of the ancient Indian history scholars have
expressed the view that there was a rich jurisdiction of human right in ancient
India. On the basis of this we can divide ancient Indian perspective related to
human right in three eras-
1. Human rights in Ancient India
2. Human rights in Medieval India
3. Human rights in Modern India
Human rights in Ancient India
In India even since the beginning of the society it’s a phase was regulated by
dharma. The concept of dharma is much more comprehensive than modern
concepts of human right. The concept of dharma deals with the right as well duties.
This supreme law covers the basics principle of human rights. We also find the rich
history of human rights in Vedas and we find that there are reference of castles
society, equality and freedom. We can divide the Vedic era in two segments which
are—
A. Vedic era
B. Post Vedic era
Vedic Era
In vedic era there was lot of rights available to the all sections of the society and
which are irrelevant to the caste, creed, sex etc. like—
I. Rights to education both for males and females
II. No polygamy in the society
III. Widow can re-marry again
IV. There was no dowry system
V. No child marriage
VI. No female infanticide
VII. Equal education of male and female in gurukul
VIII. No concept of sati pratha
Post Vedic Era
There was however a downfall of human rights jurisprudence in post vedic era. It
include following—
I. There was no right of education to women
II. Polygamy had come into practice
III. Female infanticides had started
IV. Child marriage was permissible
V. Sati system was there in this era
VI. There was dowry system
VII. Re-marriage was not allowed to widow
VIII. Caste system was there
Human rights in Medieval India
Muslim period marks the beginning in new era in the legal history in India. During
the Muslims era in India especially in the Pre-Mughal period there was series of
cultural, social and political stress and strain on the style and way of life of Hindu.
The Muslims rulers in India were fundamentalist and force upon the Hindu their
own laws, customs and religious practices.
In the mughal era the Aurangzeb was the most cruel, fanatic and despotic rulers.
He makes earnest efforts and methods to convert Hindu to Islam. But some of the
mughal rulers especially Akbar the great brought about a basic change in the style
of mughal administration. He adopted the policy of tolerance and non-
discrimination to Hindus. So it is not wrong to say that Akbar the great begin a
new era in mughal customary in India in the fields of human rights with his policy
of universal reconciliation and tolerance. But in spite of all these things no better
human rights were available to the society in the medieval India—
a. Principle of natural justice was not there
b. Brutal punishment was there like cutting of hands and feets
c. Polygamy still exists
d. Education facilities were not much available.
Human rights in Modern India
The British India rulers discriminated against India in the matter of their political
and civil liberties and rights. The status of human rights revolution in modern India
can be conviently divided into two periods—
A. Pre-Independent India
B. Post-Independent India
A Pre-Independent India
In British India there was no fundamental law guaranteed related to human right
and liberties as they humiliated and discriminated Indians.
The nationalist’s movement and the birth of Indian National Congress was the
direct result of the various atrocities against the Indians. The Indian National
Congress was founded in 1885 by a Britisher officer A.O Hume. There were lots of
reforms in the social system after the establishment of Indian National Congress
which are—
a. Sati Abolition Act 1829
b. Widow re-marriage act, 1869
c. Child marriage restraining act, 1929
d. Abolition of devdasi pratha
There was a lots of social reformers in this period who act for the betterment of the
human rights in India namely—
a. Raja Ram Mohan Rai (Sati abolition)
b. Iswar Chandra Vidyasagar (Widow re-marriage)
c. Sawami Dayananda Sarswati (Arya samaj)
B Post-Independent India
Human rights have been incorporated in Indian constitution after independence in
the form of fundamental rights and directive principal of the state policy which are
—
These are the basic human rights of all citizens, defined in Part III of
the Constitution. These are applicable irrespective of race, place of birth, religion,
caste, creed, or gender. They are enforceable by the courts, subject to specific
restrictions. Following are some of the important rights of the citizens of India in
accordance with the Constitution.
Right to Equality
Right to freedom
Right against exploitation
Right to freedom of religion
Cultural and Educational Rights
Right to Constitutional Remedies
4 . Concluding
A) Limitation
Article 29 it provide that right should be provided to the individual subject to
just requirement of morality, public order and the general welfare on
democratic society. The above may mean that the right provided in the
declaration is not absolute.
B) Interpretation
Article 30 nothing in the declaration may be interpreted as implying for any
state, group or person. Any right to engage in any activity or to perform any
act at the construction of any of the right and freedom set forth hearing.
Unit-II
Qs. International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights 1966
Ans. On the recommendation of the third committee, the general assembly finally
and unanimously adopted the two international covenants namely international
covenant on civil and political rights and international covenant of social, economic
and cultural right on December 16, 1966. While the covenant of civil and political
1966 was adopted by 106 votes to nil, the international covenant of economic, social
and cultural rights was adopted by 105 votes to nil. The general assembly also
adopted an optional protocol to the international covenant on civil and political right
1966 by the 66 votes, 2 against with 38 absented. After 23 years in December 1989,
the general assembly adopted yet another protocol named second optional protocol to
the international covenant on civil and political rights on December 15, 1989.
International covenant on civil and political rights
Covenant on civil and political right is a multi-lateral treaty adopted by the UN
general assembly on 16 December, 1966 and enforced from 23rd March 1976 in
accordance with the Article 49 of the covenant. Article 49, it allowed that the
covenant will enter into force 3 month after the date of the deposit of the 35 th
instrument of ratification accession. The covenant commits its parties to respect the
civil and political rights of the individual including the right to life, freedom of
religion, freedom to speech, freedom of assembly, electoral rights. As of the August
2017 the covenant has 172 parties.
The international covenant on civil and political rights 1966 compress of 53 articles
divided into 6 parts for the convenience of study. The articles may be classified into
following categories.
1. Preamble
2. General Article (1-5 article)
3. Subsistence Right (6-27 article)
4. Implementation or enforcement machinery (28-45 article)
5. International of saving provision (article 46-47)
6. Final and concluding provision (48-53)
1 . Preamble
The state parties to the present covenant recognize that these rights derive from the
inherit dignity of the human person recognizing that in accordance with the universal
declaration of human rights the ideal of free human beings enjoying civil and
political freedom and freedom from fear and want can only be achieved if conditions
are created whereby everyone may enjoy his civil and political rights as well as his
economic, social and cultural rights.
The obligation of the state parties under the charter of the united nation to promote
universal respect for and observance of the human rights and freedom. Realizing that
the individual having duties to another individual and to the community to which he
belongs is under a responsibility to strive for the promotion and observance of the
right recognized in the present covenant.
2 . General Article
Part II of the international covenant on civil and political right are related to the
general article which are as follow—
Article 1 –
All the people have the right of self-determination and they freely determine their
political status and their economic, social and cultural development.
Article 2—
Each state party to the present covenant undertakes to respect and to ensure the entire
individual within the territory and subject to its jurisdiction. The rights recognized in
the present covenant without distinction of any kind such as race, caste, sex, language
and religion.
Article 3—
The state parties to the present covenant undertake to ensure equal rights of men and
women to the enjoyment of all civil and political rights.
Article 4—
In the time of public emergency which threaten the life of nation and the existence of
which officially proclaimed the state party to the present covenant may take measures
derogating from their obligation under the present covenant to handle the situation.
Article 5—
Nothing in the present covenant may be interpreted as employing for any right state
group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the
distinction of any of the right and freedom recognized herein the present protocol.
3 . Substantive Rights
Article 6 to 27 of covenant enumerated specific substantive civil and political rights.
They are as follow—
Article 6 Right to life
The covenant recognizes the individual “inherit right to life” and requires it to be
protected by law.
Article 7 Prohibition of torture or cruel inhuman or degrading treatment
As with article 6, it cannot be derogated from under any circumstances. The article is
now interpreted to impose similar obligation to those required by UN convention
against torture, active measures to prevent it.
Article 8 Prohibition of slavery
The article prohibits slavery and enforced servitude in all situations. Article also
prohibits forced labor.
Article 9 Right to liberty and freedom from arbitrary arrest and detention.
It recognizes the right to liberty and security of the person. It prohibits arbitrary arrest
and detention.
Article 10 right of life and personal liberty
It requires anyone deprived of liberty to be treated with dignity and humanity.
Article 11
Prohibition of imprisonment merely on the ground of inability to fulfill a contractual
obligation.
Article 12 right to liberty of movement and freedom
It also include the right of person choose their residence, to live and return to country.
These rights apply to legal aliens as well as citizen of a state.
Article 13
Freedom of aliens in the territory of state party to covenant for arbitrary expulsion.
Article 14
Right to equality before the courts and tribunals. Right to fair and public hearing.
Article 15
Non – retroactive application of criminal law.
Article 16
Right to be recognized everywhere as a person before law.
Article 17
Rights related to family, privacy, home or correspondence.
Article 18
Freedom of thought, conscience and religion.
Article 19
Right of freedom of opinion of expression.
Article 20
Prohibition of propagate of war and advocacy of national or religious hatred.
Article 21
Right of peaceful assembly
Article 22
Right of freedom of association
Article 23
Right to marry and to formed family
Article 24
Right of every child to acquire a nationality
Article 25
Right of every citizen to vote and to be selected
Article 26
Equality before law
Article 27
Right to ethnic religious or linguistic minority to enjoy their culture or to profess their
own religion and to use their own language.
The committee shall consider the communication recived under the present protocol
in the light of all written information/report made available it by the individual and
by the state party concerned. The committee shall forward its view to the state parties
concerned and to individual.
Article 6 inclusion in the Annual Report
The committee shall include in its annual report under the Article 45 of the covenant
a summary of its activities under the present protocol.
Article 7
Declaration on granting of independence to the colonies countries and individual.
Article 8
The present protocol is open for the signature, ratification and accession.
Article 9
Coming into force of the covenant.
Article 10
The provision of the present protocol shall extend to all parts of the federal states
without any limitation or exception.
Article 11 Amendments
Any state party to the present protocol may propose an amendment and file it with
the secretary general of UN at least 1/3rd of the state parties should be in the favor of
amendment.
Article 12 denounce
Any state party may denounce the present protocol at any time by the written
notification address to the secretary general assembly of Un denouncement shall take
effect 3 months after date of receive of notification of the general assembly secretary.
Article 13
The secretary general of the UN shall inform all the state referred to in article 48 of
the covenant following particulars-
a. Signature, ratification and accession
b. Amendment
c. Denouncement
Article 14 language of text
The present protocol of which the Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish
text are equally authenticated shall be deposited in the archives of the UN and
secretary general of UN shall transmit specified copies of present protocol to all the
state referred in the art 48.
1 . Preamble
The preamble of the covenant on economic, social and cultural rights almost has
same of the covenant of civil and political rights which have been referred earlier.
The reason of their similarity is that common source of both the covenant i.e. UN
charter provision and universal declaration of human rights 1948.
2 . General Article
Part II of the international covenant on Economic, Social and cultural right are
related to the general article which are as follow—
Article 1 –
All the people have the right of self-determination and they freely determine their
political status and their economic, social and cultural development.
Article 2—
Each state party to the present covenant undertakes to respect and to ensure the entire
individual within the territory and subject to its jurisdiction. The rights recognized in
the present covenant without distinction of any kind such as race, caste, sex, language
and religion.
Article 3—
The state parties to the present covenant undertake to ensure equal rights of men and
women to the enjoyment of all civil and political rights.
Article 4—
In the time of public emergency which threaten the life of nation and the existence of
which officially proclaimed the state party to the present covenant may take measures
derogating from their obligation under the present covenant to handle the situation.
Article 5—
Nothing in the present covenant may be interpreted as employing for any right state
group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the
distinction of any of the right and freedom recognized herein the present protocol.
3 . Substantive rights
Part III of ICESCR comprising of article 6 to 15. It deals with the economic, social
and cultural rights they are—
Article 6 right to work, freedom to freely choose
Article 7 right to enjoyment of just and favorable condition of works
Article 8 right to form trade union and join the trade union of choice
Article 9 right to social security including social insurance
Article 10 right related to family, motherhood, childhood
Article 11 right to adequate standard of living for himself and his family including
adequate food, clothing and housing.
Article 12 right to enjoyment of highest attainable standard of physical and mental
health.
Article 13 right of education including compulsory and free education
Article 14 undertaking to implement principle of compulsory education free of
charge of all within a reasonable number of years.
Article 15 right to
a. take part in cultural life
b. enjoy the benefit of scientific progress and its application
benefit from protection of the moral and material interest resulting from any
scientific, literacy, artistic, production of which he is the author.
4 . Implementation or enforcement machinery
The implementations or enforcement machinery provided under part IV of this
covenant. The covenant provide for the establishment of an 18 members human
rights committee which shall be composed of state parties. The committee performs
the function of implementation of human rights in the following ways—
a. The reporting procedure
b. The inter-state communication system1
c. Individual communication system
Unit-III
Qs. The European system: the European convention for the protection of
human rights and fundamental freedom, 1950 and right guaranteed.
Ans. European convention on human rights
European convention on human rights is an international convention to protect the
human rights and political freedom on the Europe drafted by the then newly found
council of Europe. It was signed at Rome on November 1950. The convention
entered into force on 3rd September 1953.
All council of Europe members state are the party to the convention and the new
members are expected to rectify the convention at the earliest opportunity. Eropean
convention on human rights formally known as the convention for the protection of
human rights and fundamental freedom.
The convention established European court of human rights. Any person who feels
that his/her rights have been violated under the convention by a state party can take a
case in court. The judgments and finding are binding on the state party concerned and
they are obliged to execute them.
Right and freedom recognized under European convention on human rights
Under article 1 of the convention the state party of the convention undertake to
secure to everyone within their jurisdiction. The rights and freedom in article 1 of the
convention thereafter article 1 enlist and defines the following right and freedom.
Article 2 right to life
Article 3 freedom from torture/inhuman/degraded treatment or punishment.
Article 4(1) freedom from slavery
Article 4(2) freedom from forced and compulsory labor.
Article 5(1) right to liberty and feedom of peron
Article 5(2) rights arrested person to be informed of the reason of his arrest.
Article 5(3) right to be brought before the judge and to be entitled to trial within
reasonable time.
Article 6(1) right to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an
independent and impartial tribunal establish by law.
Article 6(2) presumption of innocence of a person charge with a criminal offence
until proved guilt according to law.
Article 7 non retrospective application of criminal law under national and
international law.
Article 8 right to respect for private and family life, home and correspondence.
Article 9 right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion including freedom to
change religion or belief, freedom to reside either alone or in community with other.
Article 10 right to freedom of expression including freedom to hold opinion and to
receive and impart information and idea without interference by public authority.
Article 11 right to freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of association
including to form and to join trade union for the protection of his interest.
Article 12 right of men and women on marriageable age to marry and to found a
family.
Article 13 right to have an effective remedy before a national authority against the
violation of right and freedom set forth in this convention.
Article 14 protocol 1 right of every natural and legal person to the peaceful
enjoyment of his possession.
Protocol 2 right to education
Protocol 3 right to have free election and the free expression of the opinion of the
people in the choice of the legislation.
Protocol 4 right not to expel from the state of which the person is national.
Protocol 4 freedom from collective expulsion from the state.
Protocol 6 abolition of death penality.
Protocol 7 right of review of a conviction by a higher court.
Unit-IV
Qs. Human Rights in India: Constitutional guarantees of Fundamental Rights
Ans. The Fundamental Rights are defined as the basic human rights of all citizens.
These rights, defined in Part III of the Constitution, apply irrespective of race,
place of birth, religion, caste, creed or sex.
Fundamental Rights may well be called the soul of our Constitution. These are the
very basic rights that are universally recognized as fundamental to human
existence and indispensable for human development. It guarantees civil liberties
such that all Indians can lead their lives in peace and harmony as citizens of India.
They include individual rights common to most liberal democracies, such as
equality before the law, freedom of speech and expression, freedom of association
and peaceful assembly, freedom of religion, and the right to constitutional
remedies for the protection of civil right.
Article 14 - Art. 14 of the Indian Constitution say, “The State shall not deny to any
person equality before the law or equal protection of the laws within the territory
of India”. All are equal before the law. That means, no one can claim any special
privilege. Nobody is above the law of the land.
Article 15 - Prohibition of discrimination on grounds only of religion, race, caste,
sex or place of birth.
Article 16 - Article 16 of Indian Constitution ensures equality of opportunity for
all citizens in public employment. It is further provided that in case of public
employment the State cannot make any discrimination on grounds only of religion,
race, sex, descent, place of birth or residence
Article 17- Article 17 of Indian Constitution declares the abolition of
untouchability and prohibit its practice in any form. The enforcement men
disability arising out of ‘Untouchability’ shall be an offence punishable in
accordance with law .
Article 18 - Article 18 of Constitution of India prevents the State from conferring
of title. Besides, no Indian citizen shall accept any title from any foreign state. This
is considered to be an important step towards the establishment of social equality in
India.
2. Right to Freedom (Articles 19 - 22): There are six rights under this category:-
Right to freedom of Speech and Expression.
Right to freedom of peaceful Assembly with out arms.
Right to form associations or Unions.
Right to Move freely throughout the territory of India.
Right to Residence and settle in any part of the Country.
Right to practice any Profession or carry any Trade, occupations.
3. Right against Exploitation (Articles 23 - 24):
Article 23 - Article 23 of Indian Constitution declares Prohibition of traffic in
human beings and forced labor.
Article 24 - Article 24 of Indian Constitution states that the employment of
children under 14 years in factories or mines, are punishable offences.
The Supreme Court under article 32 and the High Court 226 can issue the writs
of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, and quo-warranto.
Habeas Corpus- It is a Latin word means “To have a body of”. It is an order
issued by the Court to a person who has detained another person to produce the
body of the latter before it.
Mandamus - It literally means “We Command.” A mandamus is an order from a
court to an inferior government official ordering the government official to
properly fulfill their official duties or correct an abuse of discretion.
Prohibition - Means “to forbid.” It is issued by the higher court to lower court to
prevent the latter exceeding its jurisdiction or usurping a jurisdiction that it does
not posses.
Quo-Warranto - It means “By What Authority.” It is issued by the court to
enquire into the legality of claim of a person to a public office.
Qs. The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 and functioning of the Human
Rights Commission of India
Ans. For the protection of human right protection of human right act 1993 was
passed in India on which the president of India gave his assent on 8 th January 1994
The purpose of the enactment is laid down in the Preamble of the Act i.e., it
provides for the establishment of a National Human Rights Commission, State
Human Rights Commissions in States and Human Rights Courts for better
protection of human rights.
Definition of Human Right
According to Protection of Human right Act 1993 section 2(d)—
“Human right is the right related to the life, liberty, equality and dignity of the
individual guaranteed by the constitution or embodied in the international
covenants and enforceable by the courts in India.”
On the basis of above definition the meaning of human rights are-
1. Which are necessary for maintaining human dignity or for leading a
dignified life.
2. Which are necessary for physical, mental, and intellectual development of
individual.
3. Which are included in the international covenants and convention.
4. Which are protected by the Indian constitution and enforceable by the courts
in India.
The main object of the act—
1. Better protection of human right
2. The constitution of national human right commission, state human rights
commission .
3. Setting up of human right court
National Human Rights Commission (N.H.R.C.)
Chapter II of the Act deals with the constitution of the National Human Rights
Commission (N.H.R.C.). Section 3 of the Act lays down that the Central
Government shall constitute a body known as the National Human Rights
Commission. N.H.R.C. is an eight-member body. The Commission consists of:
a) A Chairperson who has been a Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
b) One Member who is, or has been a judge of the Supreme Court
c) One Member who is, or has been, the Chief Justice of a High Court
d) Two Members to be appointed from amongst persons having knowledge of, or
practical experience in, matters relating to human rights. Besides these, the
Commission shall include:
e) The Chairperson of National Commission for Minorities
f) The Chairperson of the National Commission for the Scheduled Castes and
Scheduled Tribes
g) The Chairperson of the national Commission for Women
The Act also makes provision for a Secretary General who shall be the Chief
Executive Officer of the Commission, who shall exercise such powers and
discharge such functions of the Commission as are delegated to him.
Appointment of Chairperson and other Members
The President appoints the Chairperson and other members of the Commission
after obtaining the recommendations of the Committee consisting of:
a) Prime Minister – Chairperson
b) Speaker of the House of People - Member
c) Minister in charge of Ministry of Home Affairs in the Government of India -
Member
d) Leader of the Opposition in the House of the People - Member
e) Leader of the Opposition in the Council of States - Member
f) Deputy Chairperson of the Council of States - Member
This question is that what is life and personal liberty.” Generally it is understood as
right to live. Every person has the right to live. The right to live also has a different
meaning. It means not only with living, but with respectful and humanly pride’
living.
‘Kharak Singh Vs State of U.P.’ (A.I.R. 1963 S.C. 1295)- Supreme Court while
describing this right said that- “Right to live means not merely animal existence,
but living respectfully and human dignity.”
Similarly, “Maneka Gandhi s Union of India” (A.I.R. 1978 S.C. 597)- the
Supreme Court held that- “The expression ‘personal liberty’ covers a variety of
rights which go to constitute the personal liberty of man.’
Above analysis shows that right of life and personal liberty means- right to live
respectfully and with human dignity. With the passage of time, several subject
related to human dignity have been included in this right, namely-
Right to fair hearing and speedy trial- in changing circumstances, our courts
have included fair hearing trial ad speedy trial in the right to life and personal
liberty under Article 21.
‘State Vs Maksudan Singh (A.I.R. 1986 Patna 38)- Patna Court said that the right
to life and personal liberty has extended to the matters of speedy trial.
Right to Free Legal Aid- Now, right to free legal aid has also been considered to
be part of right to life and personal liberty under Article 21. Although, free legal
aid has not been given place in Article 21, rather it is mentioned in Article 39 A
(Directive Principles of State Policy); but judicial decision have given it the
position of fundamental right.
‘M.H. Haskot Vs state of Maharashtra (A.I.R. 1978 S.C. 1548)- Supreme Court
clearly said that- “It is the duty of state to provide free legal aid to poor, not a
relief.”
But, such law must be in accordance to the principles of natural justice and be
reasonable no one can be devoid of his right owing to an arbitrary law.
‘A.K. Gopalan Vs State of Madras’ (A.I.R. 1952 S.C. 27)- Supreme court while
ratifying it said that “Procedure established b y law must be reasonable, justifiable
and according to principles of natural justice.”
Cool Earth
It is a UK based international non-governmental organization that protects
endangered rainforest to combat global warming, protect ecosystems and provide
sustainable jobs for local people. Cool Earth also refers to a Japanese program
generally called the “Cool Earth Partnership,” inaugurated in 2007. Cool Earth
protects and secures rainforest under imminent threat of destruction, working with
other NGOs.
Human Rights Foundation
The Human Rights Foundation (HRF) is a non-profit organization whose stated
mission “is to ensure that freedom is both preserved and promoted” in the
Americas. [The Human Rights Foundation was founded in 2005 by Thor
Halverson. Its head office is in New York City, New York, USA. Its definition of
human rights focuses on the essential ideals of freedom of self-determination and
freedom from tyranny and the rights of property.
It came into existence in 1976-77 as the Delhi unit of a larger national forum, and
became PUDR on 1 February, 1981.In the last two and a half decades of its
existence the organisation has taken up hundreds of instances of violations of
democratic rights, covering most parts of the country and involving the rights of
many sections of society. PUDR conducts investigations, issues statements,
distributes leaflets, organizes public meetings, demonstrations and dharnas, and
fights legal cases to highlight the violation of people’s rights, and to help towards
their redressal. PUDR also takes up issues of general importance that affect the
rights of people through general campaigns, publications and legal interventions.
These include: gender equality; rights of forest-dwellers and forest policy; working
class rights; agrarian conflict; caste oppression; deaths, rapes and torture in police
custody; and undemocratic legislation, in particular the various incarnations of the
‘terrorist act’ (TADA and POTA) etc.
Rights and You (formerly Child Relief and You, till 2005), commonly abbreviated
as CRY is a non-profit organization in India that aims to restore children’s rights in
India. The organization was established in 1979. The organization partners with
grass-roots Nongovernmental organizations to uplift thousands of Indian children
denied basic children’s rights In 2007, its media campaign showing “smiling kids”
and asking citizens to partner instead of simple donate, was seen as departure from
stereotypical NGO sector advertising in India