Decline of the Mughals:

Reasons:
Aurangzeb’s religious reforms

 Reinstituted Jizya Tax on non-Muslims.

 Destroyed Hindu Temples
 Enforced Islamic Laws
 Banned Suttee (Hindu Tradition)
 All of which led to Hindu’s (who formed a large part of India) agitation.
Aurangzeb’s wars.

 Fought a war against the Rajputs

 Attempted to expand North (in a campaign against NWFP pathans) Numerous Rebellions (Sikhs, Satnamis,
Jatts). The Maratha War which was the costliest.
 ^All these wars resulted in heavy taxes, and emptied the Mughal treasury. Leaving the Mughal Empire in
economic misery.
Aurangzeb’s love for luxury.

 Built palaces, spend huge sums on himself.

 ^E.g Pearl Mosque for his own private prayers in Dehli made him unpopular. Furthered economic decline.
Indefinite law of succession.

 The dead Mughal emperor’s sons would fight for power.

 He tried preventing this by dividing the empire between his 4 sons. Didn’t work
 Muezzin was first emperor. Died. His sons fought. In 10 years, 12 claimed the throne. These wars cost a
lot. Weakening the economy. Many capable soldiers, nobles died. Left the empire divided and weak.
Lazy ass successors.

 Were lazy, incompetent. Unable to control government.

 Handed the government over to the mansabdars (Nobles put in charge, system started by Akbar. These
were often corrupt, disloyal and sought their own gains) these often corrupt nobles grew in power. Some
princes and rulers were assassinated by courtiers. Such as Farukhsiyar and Alamgir
 Thus, there was an imbalance of power. Any emperor who would take control could not rule.
>Military Inefficiency.

 Mughals used to be powerful, disciplined armies. Used to fight with clever tactics. With strong
commanders.
 They became complacent with time. Didn’t feel the need for an army. Army became weak. Less
disciplined. No modern advancements in warfare.
 Army was also made of different groups: Persian. Afghani etc.
 The Mughals lacked a naval fleet as well, despite having numerous ports.
>Vast Empire.

 Over 1000’s of Communication and transport was difficult. Months before news e.g: Rebellions reached
the emperor, and he couldn’t react in time.
 The Mansabdary system was weak and corrupt, no longer countered tis. Bihar, Deccan, Bengal managed to
declare independence at points.
>Invaders.
  Nadir Shah, Persian leader invaded. Defeated Muhammad Shah at Karnal 1734
 He sacked Delhi. Left after 2 months with many jewels, good and the peacock throne Ahmed Shah, an
Afghan came in 1747.Attacked Kabul, Peshawar and Lahore. Had control over Punjab by 1749.
Kashmir, Multan by 1756.
>British.

 Finally took control and effectively ended Mughal Rule

 They were military better equipped. Also employed local sepoys. Had military experience from their
combat against the French, Portuguese.
 Won decisive Battles: Plassey, Buxar. Mir Jafar betrayed Indians, helped British. Exploited captured lands
for a lot of profit.

British Rule
Why the British took control over the EIC.
The Volume of trade and profit to the British was extremely significant. The crown did not feel that a thing of such
importance should remain in the hands of a private company. They thus took control of the EIC.

The British needed to shape their foreign policy, since the Russians seemed to be trying to expand . This couldn’t be
done under the EIC.

British Prestige was at stake. The needed expansion to regain the image they had lost in their disgraceful loss at
Kabul by the Afghans.

Why European nations became involved in the subcontinent.

India had certain raw materials that the rest of the world did not have and they desired, including spices, cotton,
sugar, silk, jute etc

The British had a great regard for the raw materials, since they had recently undergone the industrial revolution and
wished to expand their industries.

The Middle Eastern countries had a tax on Europeans, and the Byzantine Empire was now under the ottomans who
sought cheaper trade routes.

They avoided land routes in the middle East, since trading via sea was cheaper, more effective and gave economy of
scale.

British went to India since other lands (e.g: Africa) were already under Portuguese control. They also fought against
the French here.

Taking control of India:

Successes (Of Indians in resisting)

In 1666, EIC grew proud, refused taxes and issued coins. Aurangzeb sent a force against them, defeated them. EIC
paid a fine, apologized, reduced activities. >In 1756, Nawab of Bengal, Siraj ud Daulah defeated EIC and managed
to drive them away from and they captured Calcutta.

Tipu Sultan had French support, and used his strong army against the EIC at several times. Defeating them.
Failures:

The very next year in 1757, The British, under Robert Clive defeated Siraj ud Daulah’s forces with the help of Mir
Jafar’s betrayal. Siraj died, and the Mir Jafar was placed as a puppet ruler by the British

In The Battle of Buxar of 1764, the British defeated the Mir Jafar’s son, Mir Qasim and Shah Alam II and the
Nawabs of Oudh. This extended their influence, gave them Bengal, Bihar and Orissa. They collected Revenue from
here, managed to get a bigger army. Ended true Muslim Rule.

In 1782, first GG, Warren Hastings signed a treaty with the Marathas They could now focus on other places, and
Maratha take over was prevented.

In 1799, GG Wellesley invaded Mysore and killed Tipu Sultan. They thus killed a strong enemy and took control of
his lands in Mysore.

In 1803, The British entered Delhi, forced Shah Alam II to accept rule under “British Protection” … which basically
meant that The Emperor no longer had any real power. British were true rulers by this point.

They provoked the Sindh Amirs into war despite a treaty signed between the two parties in an attempt to make up
for their disgrace in Afghanistan.

British managed this partly because of the Industrial Revolution, which made them technologically superior, giving
them an edge over the Indians with their weapons, techniques.

British Reforms/Rule.
India was very wealthy, but this wealth was heavily exploited by the british, with all this wealth going over to the
British.

In 1829, they banned Suttee (A common hindu tradition)

Replaced Persian with English as the government language … Indians could no longer get government jobs.

Indians had to send their children to co-ed schools with westernized Educations. They disliked this as it went against
their culture and religion.

Christian Missionaries came and set up schools, and seemed to try and convert the local populace to Christianity.
This was resented by the Indians.

British brought in the railway system, which is also annoyed the Indians as they felt that the British were trying to
intervene in India too much.

British sold cotton in India (thanks to Industrial Revolution) and collapsed the Indian Textile Industry, leaving
millions jobless and poor.

The War of Independence.

Reasons for outbreak:
Political: The British introduced the Doctrine of Lapse, allowing them to confiscate the territory of any local ruler
who did not have a real male heir. This did not please the Indian landlords as they were being deprived for their
lands and thus rebelled.

Political: In 1957 the Mughal Emperor had little power left but was still an important symbolic figure. The British
moved the Royal family form the Red fort of Delhi to a more obscure Qutub Sahi. Indians saw this as mistreatment.

Political: At a lower level of society there was a resentment of the lack of oppurtunities for native Indians in the
Civil service. This resulted in more hatred for the British as their rights were not considered.

Political: 1934, English replaced Persian as the official language of administration. This created resentment because
it wasn’t only seen as cultural intervention but also increased Indian unemployment as they didn’t know English.

Military: Greased Cartridge Incident

Military: Most of the sepoys were Indian, whereas officers were always British.

Military: They sent Indan troops to fight in Afghanistan. Unpopular as Hindus didn’t want to leave mother India and
Muslims didn’t want to fight other Muslims.

Religious: Furthermore, regular rumors that Muslim, Hindu, Sikh soldiers would be forced to convert to
Christianity. Angered Indian solders who felt that their religion was under threat.

Religious: Hindu tradition suttee was abolished, widow remarriage allowed. Pardha was ridiculed by the British,

Religious: Christian Missionaries made schools, taught Christianity, expected locals to give up own religion.
Employers sometimes offered incentives for this.

Social: British had a very low view of the Indians. The tried to spread their own culture, and considered the Indians
inferior and were reluctant in giving them high posts.

Social: The British were tried in special courts, but Indians/Locals were tried in ordinary courts. Judgments were
made by the British and were often cruel/harsh.

Reasons for failure:

Disunity: There was disunity among the rebels. They lacked a common purpose and everyone fought for personal
interest, often refused to fight unless they were harmed. …Nana Sahib, only interested in getting doctrine of lapse
reversed and was ready to come to terms if this demand was accepted. Thus, Muslims lacked a common cause from
the Indians, weakening them.

Disunity: Some of the princely state rulers supported the British in order to maintain their own power. Such as the
ruler of Kashmir, who sent 2000 troops to help the British. Thus their strength against the war grew, and the Indians
were less united.

Disunity: Lord Canning, the Governor General, adopted a conciliator policy towards the rebels. He allowed many
concessions for them: Announcing the rebels who gave up their arms were to be forgiven. Thus, quite a few leaders
left the battlefield to join in negotiations with the government.
Disunity: There had been a great deal of vandalism in the war, thus the local population was harmed and became
displeased with the rebel’s nefarious activities. Instead, they sympathized with the British who stood for law and
order. Hence the British strength increased even further, rebels weakened.

British Strength: Punjab and Sindh had been conquered by the British with their troops from Bengal and Central
Asia. So, when the troops rebelled in 1857, the Punjabis and Singhies did not support. Meaning a much smaller
amount of rebels against the British might.

British Strength: The Last Mughal emperor, Bahadur Shah II, who was considered the main leader of the revolt
showed incompetence during the war. More interested in poetry and luxury, and neglected the affairs of combat.
Thus, his poor administration meant weak control.

British Strength: The British had experienced the Industrial Revolution and were technologically much more
superior. Thus they had advanced weaponry, giving them an edge over the Mughal/Indian forces who had traditional
and outdated weaponry.

British Strength: The British were a superpower at that time and had well trained, confident soldiers led by
outstanding generals such as Edwards and Neil. Who fought with devotion and loyalty to the British Queen. The
rebel leaders in comparison were indecisive and short sighted and hence were easily defeated by the British.

Results of the war of Independence:

Negative: The Indians failed their main objective of ending British Rule/Driving them out of the subcontinent. They
not only failed, but ended as slaves to the British. They British attained complete autonomy over the country and
established a rather tyrannical rule over the Indians.

Negative: The Mughal Empire was removed from the Indian political scene forever as the country came directly
under the British Crown by the 1858 proclamation by Queen Victoria. The Muslims were greatly dismayed by this,
as the main figure of Muslim authority was exiled.

Negative: The war left a trail of mutual fear and distrust in the minds of the ruler and the ruled. The British became
cautious, rigid, reactionary in their attitude towards the Indians especially the Muslims, considering to be solely
responsible for the revolt, since the wanted to restore the Mughal Empire. Thus the British began to develop a policy
of suppressing the Muslims in their every walk of life. This hatred continued for half a century.

Negative: The army taking the initiative in the War of Independence was thoroughly revised. The number of
European Soldiers was increased. Dismaying the Indians, who took part in an attempt to gain better posts and
salaries through the revolt. Instead, some soldiers became jobless

Negative: The forces that had rebelled were executed by the British. Cruel punishments, such as being blown to
pieces by a canon were used.

Positive: The British tried to being about a change in their administration and policies. They ended the “British East
India Co’ to the happiness of the Indians who were now relieved of the Company’s tyranny. Thus there now to be
ruled through a new, possibly less cruel ruler.

Positive: New reforms and constitutional changes were introduced. An act for the better government of India was
passed and introduced. It involved a Secretary of State with a council of 15 members to help him. Policy of
centralization in the 1833 act was changed, and new principles of decentralization and indianisation were
recognized. And Indians could now be elected in provincial councils and thus attain power at a provincial level.
Positive: Moreover the 1861 Act restored legislative powers to the governments of Bombay and Madras. New
Legislative Councils were established in many provinces including Punjab, Bengal etc. Thus, Indians were given
much more political say, which had been an aim of theirs in the War of Independence.

Positive: The British policy of annexations was changed. The queen declared no more extensions to their present
territorial possessions. Also, the Doctrine of Lapse was abandoned and Indians could now inherit ancestral lands
with ease.

Positive: Greased Cartridge supply stopped. Indians relieved of a very sensitive Religious issue.

Shah Wali Ullah

Why he wished to revive Islam In the subcontinent:
He believed that most of the problems of Muslims was due to their incomplete Knowledge and understanding of the
Holy Quran. As the Holy Quran is in Arabic whereas common Muslims knew Persian. He wanted that the Quranic
teachings be made accessible to the common people so they may act on them

The Muslim community was divided into sects, such as Sunni and Shia. Thus they were vulnerable to attacks on
their religion. SWU wanted them to put aside their differences o that a more united and strong community could be
created.

Many Unislmaic practices had enterest Islam due to constant interaction with Hindus and other no Muslim
communities. Thus they had forgotten the moral andspiritual principles of Islam. Hence SWU wished to revive
Islam to purify the Islamic Society.

Works:
Translation of Quran into Persian, the local language, despite opposition of the ulemas. So it was easier for common
Muslims to act on Islamic teachings. Thus Islam was revived among the locals. This also paved way for his sons to
translate it into Urdu, making it available to even more people.

Also treid to stop the Muslims dividing into sects. Studied the differences between Sunni and Shia objectively and
wrote an account of the first four caliphs in a way acceptable to both groups. Thus treid to reconcile between them to
unite the Muslims >Wrote 51 books on different aspects of Islam like Fiqh and HAdis. Significant among them were
the Hujjatullah ul Baligha and Izalat ul Akhfa. This helped Muslim understand Islamic principles and act on them.

Also taught at the Madrassa Rahimiya for many years. Important as it paved for the youth to familiarize themselves
with the fundamental principles and glorious past of Islam hence inducing solidarity and pride in them regarding
their religion.

Tried to unite the Muslims against the Marathas and Sikhs so Islam could be protected and revived. It was he who
invited Ahmed shah Durrani from Persia. He defeated the Marathas and the Muslims were saved from no Muslim
tyranny.
Revived Islam in the prevalent economic system by stressing on social justice, equibilarium. He made laborers and
craftsmen more aware by stressing that they should be paid justly and urged traders and business to adapt a fair
Islamic system of trading thus eliminating sense of corruption in Business activities.

Haji Shariat Ullah

Why he wished to revive Islam in the subcontinent.
Believed that Muslims of the sub continent were leading miserable lives because they had started following Hindu
practices due to their interaction with them. Thus they started the Faraizi Movement to purify the Islamic society.

Muslims in Bengal were surprised by the Hindu landlords. HSU wanted to end this tyranny. Thus he started the
Faraizi Movement to create a sense of Jihad in muslims so that they could fight for their rights.

Muslims had forgotten the basic principles of Islam and did not practice religious obligations i.e Faraizi prayer and
fasting. Thus he started the Faraizi movement to insist upon them to follow the pillars of Islam

Work:
He began his reform movement known as the “Faraizi Movement” started as a reaction to the anti Islamic policies of
British and Hinds. The movement insisted upon the fullfillument of Fariaz i.e one’s religious obligations imposed by
God and His Prophets. His followers came to be known as the “fairizis” on account of their insistence of the
fulfillment of one’s duties. As a result many Muslims declared themselves to the performance of their duties and
became staunch Muslims

Brought the Muslim peasantry together against the cruel exploitation by the Hindu Zamindars, infused a spirit
amongst the Peasants who got together to direct Jihad against the then religious and social oppression to fight for
their rights. This confidence and awakening of the Bengalis from their slumber prepared the grounds for future
works of his successors like Titu Mir and Dadu mian.

Worked towards elimination of Hind customs that had crept into Muslim society due to their continuous interaction.
Significant as he attempted to purify the lives of Muslims so that they oculd not only distinguish Islamic practices
and rituals but also follow the true Islam.

Syed Ahmed Shaheed Barelvi

Why he launched the Jihad movement against Sikhs of Punjab.
The Sikh rulers of Punjab were not letting the Muslims practice their religious freely and even the Azaan was
banned. This angered SASB and he launched the Jihad movement against the Sikhs for Muslim religious freedom.

He launched it against the two main anti Muslim forces, British in Bengal and Sikhs in Punjab. He was aware that
British were hard to defeat as a superpower, and thus hard to defeat. Therefore he launched the Jihad against the
Siks first as they were a relativel weaker force and he thus was more likely to win against them

SASB knew that Punjab was surrounded by Muslim tribes, which encouraged him to fight against the Sikhs as these
could help him

Work:
Launched the Jihad Movement against the Sikhs in Punjab as they were not letting the Muslims practice their
religion freely. He gathered an army and launched war on them. Although the Mujahedeen were later defeated, this
shows his commitment to liberate Muslims from oppressive rulers and grant them their due rights.
This movement not only infused a great deal of determination and moral courage but also had influence on future
generations, inspiring them. It was like a forerunner for the Pakistan Movement.

It Unified Muslims together of different regions, created awareness among of them regarding their political,
religious and cultural rights. It was also the first movement meant to free Muslims from tyranny rather than place a
ruler in power.

Reasons for the movement’s failure.

SASB was not well trained in military tactics. Most of the fighters were teachers, or spiritual leaders. This made it
difficult for the Mujahideen forces to fight against the Sikhs and come up with clever strategies to defeat them. On
the other hand, the Sikhs were tough and well trained under Ranjit, who was a strong military ruler.

The Muslim army was disunited. The Muslims were of many different backgrounds. Soldiers often mistrusted each
other and were reluctant to agree with one another. As a result, due to internal conflicts there wasn’t always full
support from everybody. Which weakened the Muslim forces..

The Pathans did not tolerate being in an army that they weren’t ruining themselves. They weren’t ready to
compromise which strained their relations with other Muslims. This weakened the Muslim forces as there was less
support from pathan tribes. >SASB imposed taxes on locals to bear military costs, but local people were pissed off
since they had never payed such a tax and were thus resented SASB. As a result, SASB lost support of the local
people which further weakened his forces. >He thus lost money from taxes and his funds became limited and thus
not all the military costs could be afforded. They could not improve upon/buy more needed military equipment.

Moreover, SASB’s army was not as sincere to him. There were attempts by Yar Muhamad Khan to assassinate
SASB. He thus had to tackle with internal threats as well as external ones. Thus, his attention was diverted from his
main goal, which was to defeat the Sikhs. Yar Muhammad’s army betrayed him in battle in Akora, weakened his
fighting and causing his defeat.

When SASB was moving to Balakot, traitors informed Sikhs of the Muslim’s route. Thus, the Sikhs prepared
themselves and strengthened their forces which made it easier for them to defeat the Muslims. So, when they
launched their surprise attack at Balakot, the Muslims were unprepared for this unexpected attack, and were
defeated. >Sikhs outnumbered the Muslims in this battle. The weaker Mujahideen lost, and SASB was killed,
effectively ending the movement.

Sir Syed Ahmed Khan:

Why he was considered Pro British:
SSAK saved the lives of many British women and children during the WoI. Since the Muslims were fighting against
the British, this angered the Muslims and they started calling him pro-British.

Sir Syed wanted the Musims to not fight against the British in WoI. As he believed that they would be easily
defeated by the British, as they were a superior power. Therefore he was called Pro British as everyone thought he
was trying to establish British Power. >Muslims of the subcontinent believed that the British were invaders.
Whereas Sir Syed believed that the Muslim should accept that British were rulers of the Indians and should accept
their ideas, such as Western Education therefore this angered the Muslims and they labeled him pro British.

Why he established the Aligarh movement:

The British considered the Muslims guilty for the 1857 uprising. So after the war, the British started the policy of
repression against the Muslims. Sir Syed wanted to end this policy. He thus started the movement to strengthen
relations between Muslims and British by removing doubts of the British of Muslim loyalty.>Muslims considered
the British as only invaders, and didn’t accept co operation with them. SSAK believed that Muslims should accept
that British were now rulers and to accept British ideas, such as Western Education, so that they could improve their
social and economic relations which will enable them to take jobs in civil service and army.

The Hindus of the sub continent were progressing socially, politically and economically due to their co operation
with the British. This worried SSAK as he believed that the Muslims would get dominated by the Hindus and
therefore he established the Aligarh Movement to inform the Muslims about the Hindu threat, and counter it.

Why SSAK tried to improve British – Muslim relationship.

The British considered the Muslims responsible for the WoT. Therefore they started a policy of repression against
them. As SSAK wanted an end to this tyranny, therefore he tried to improve British – Muslim relationship to remove
British Doubts about Muslim loyalty.

Muslims considered British as foreign invaders and were thus reluctant to acquire Western Education whereas
SSAK believed that Western Education was important for Muslims to live a prosperous life. Therefore he tried to
bridge the gap between the two communities so that Muslims could accept British Ideas.

SSAK feared that the Hindus would dominate Muslims as due to their co-operative attitude towards the rulers, they
were developing economically, socially and politically. Therefore, SSAK tried to improve the British – Muslim
relationship so that Muslims could come on par with the Hindus.

Why did SSAK want insist upon Muslims to acquire Western Education?
SSAK asked Muslims to acquire western educations so that Muslims could get civil service jobs because no
language of administration was English and to improve their social and economic condition

Hindus received educations from English schools which improved their confidence and they viewed illiterate
Muslims as inferiors. This worried SSAK and he asked Muslims to acquire education to come on par with the
Hindu.

SSAK believed that as Quran stressed upon knowledge and exploring the universe, therefore western education of
science was in line with the Quranic teachings. So he emphasized upon Muslims to acquire education to understand
the full majesty of God as the creator.

Why SSAK developed his two nation theory:

Firstly Urdu had been the official language of India for many years. However the Hindus wanted it changed to their
language, Hindi. This view wasn’t shared by the Muslims as Urdu was their main language. This provoked SSAK to
give his “Two Nation Theory” as he realized that the Hindus and Muslims were two different nations because of
their opposite cultures.

Secondly the Hindus wanted parliamentary system in India. Sir Syed, however rejected this by saying that as Hindus
were in majority they wanted to dominate the Muslim minority b winning ever election. So that’s why SSSAK
advocated his “Two Nation Theory” as he realized that These nations could not live in harmony.

Thirdly the Congress spoke of open competitive examinations for government jobs. However, SSAK rejected this as
Muslims were not educated enough to pass these exams and so most of the posts would be taken over the educated
Hindus.

Efforts to improve British Muslim relations:

Wrote the loyal Mohammadans of India – Gave a detailed account of the loyal services which Muslims had given
and named various Muslims who had shown particular loyalty to the British. He not only defended Muslims from
British accusations that they were disloyal but also called on them to end their hostility towards the Muslims

Wrote pamphlet: “Essay on the causes of the Indian revolt” – Pointed out causes of the WOI. (Poor management of
India, forced conversions). Pamphlet helped convince the British that they were wrong to blame the uprising on
Muslims. Some British readily decreased hostility and sympathized.

Sir Syed removed the “Nadarath” misunderstanding – British thought this was insult. Sir Syed said it meant
“Helper”. Thus term reflected the positive term the Muslims had of the British.

Wrote rebuttal of an English book on The Holy Prophet (pbuh)’s life – Corrected errors concerning the life of the
Holy Prophet (pbuh) and Islam. Tried to convince the British that their Islamic knowledge was limited and needed to
improve upon it to remove misconceptions.

Wrote Tabyin ul Kalam (Commentary on the bible) – Pointed out similarities between Islam and Christianity. This
was incomplete, but shows his commitment in improving Muslim British relationship.

Established British Indian association – A platform where members of both communities could interact with each
other and discuss various issues…helped to improve the level of understanding and cooperation between the two
people.

Wrote pamphlet “Ahka Amet’ame ahle kitab” Food laws of people of the book – Told Muslims that they were
allowed in Islam to dine with other chirstians …Urged upon them that they were closer to the British than the
Hindus (Who were reluctant to eat with the Muslims)

Efforts to make Muslims acquire western education:

Journal on Tehzib ul Akhlaq – This journal included articles from influential Muslims who agreed with Sir Syed that
there was a need for new approach regarding education. Some Ulemas attacked it, yet it played a major part in
bringing about an intellectual revolution amongst the Muslim thinkers.

Scientific society at Ghazipur – Translated scientific writings from English, Persian or Arabic into Urdu; the main
language of the Muslims. Muslims knew knowledge of science was being improved. Helped reduce Muslim hatred
towards British as they read about scientific works and realized that they were more than just invaders but had done
a lot for humanity through scientific inventions

Founded schools in Ghazipur, Muradabad

These efforts of Sir Syed shows his commitment towards expanding educational opportunities for
Muslims as Muslims were reluctant to go in British Schools

Established MAO (Muhammad Anglo Oriental) school in 1875, made into college in 1877 – Provided Western and
Islamic education on the pattern of English Public School system. This proved beneficial for Muslims in many
ways:

 Provided quality educations to the Muslims of India and after graduating from this institute they could get
better jobs in te Government Department
 It became a symbol of unity fr Muslims in the absence of the Muslim League
  Many future leaders of Pakistan such as LAK and Ayub Khan were educated there and many historians
believe that this institution contributed the most for the formation of Pakistan
 It also helped to improve British Muslim relationship as noy only many British were teaching in this
institute which created respect in the hearts of Muslims for the British but also after receiving English
education, now the Muslims were in a better position to communicate with the British in their language and
remove misconceptions
Mohammaden Educational Conference – Aim was to publicize the new educational Methods being used at MAO.

This helped improve Muslim education standards

Also played a major role in establishing a Muslim political platform in the days before the League was
established as it attracted famous orators and writers who discussed the political problems of the Muslims
in India

It was after the 29th session of the same organization in December 1906 at Dhaka that major leaders
gathered to form the Muslim League, which was the founding party of Pakistan.