Cambridge IGCSE ™: French 0520/23 October/November 2022
Cambridge IGCSE ™: French 0520/23 October/November 2022
Cambridge IGCSE ™: French 0520/23 October/November 2022
FRENCH 0520/23
Paper 2 Reading October/November 2022
MARK SCHEME
Maximum Mark: 45
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the October/November 2022 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE™, Cambridge International A and AS Level components and some Cambridge O Level
components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers. They should be applied alongside the
specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these
marking principles.
The following guidance underpins the detailed instructions provided in the mark scheme. Where a decision is taken to deviate from this guidance
for a particular question, this will be specified in the mark scheme.
Often the additional guidance points will have to be weighed up against each other, e.g. the answer might look or sound like the intended
word/phrase in French, but if what the candidate has written means something different in French from what is expected, the mark cannot be
awarded.
It is not possible to list all acceptable alternatives in the mark scheme. If you encounter an answer which is not covered by the mark scheme, you
will need to make a decision about whether it communicates the required elements (in consultation with your Team Leader if necessary, or with
your Product Manager if you are a single examiner), and award marks accordingly.
• Crossing out:
(a) If a candidate changes his/her mind about an answer and crosses out an attempt, award a mark if the final attempt is correct.
(b) If a candidate crosses out an answer to a whole question but makes no second attempt at it, mark the crossed out work.
(a) If more than one attempt is visible but the candidate has clearly indicated which attempt is his/her final answer (e.g. by crossing out
other attempts or by annotating the script in some way), mark in the usual way.
(b) If two attempts are visible (e.g. two boxes ticked instead of the one box stipulated), and neither has been crossed out/discounted by
the candidate, no mark can be awarded.
• For questions requiring more than one element for the answer, 1 and 2, where the answers are interchangeable:
(a) Both of the correct answers are on line 1 and line 2 blank (or vice versa) = 2 marks
(b) Both correct answers on line 1 and line 2 contains a wrong answer (or vice versa) = 1 mark
(a) If you read aloud what the candidate has written, does it sound like the correct answer? Would a native speaker of French understand
it?
(b) Does what the candidate has written look like the correct answer, e.g. one letter missing but no other word created? Would a native
speaker of French understand it?
(a) INV = invalidation. This is used when the additional material included by the candidate is judged to invalidate an otherwise correct
answer and therefore prevents him/her from scoring the mark. (INV = 0)
(b) tc = ‘tout court’. This means that, on its own, the material is not sufficient to score the mark.
(c) HA = harmless addition. This means that the candidate has included additional material which, in conjunction with the correct answer,
does not prevent him/her from scoring the mark.
(b) Award 0:
If there is any attempt that earns no credit, e.g. the candidate has copied out part or all of the question.
(a) Extra material, mentioned in the This is acceptable and is not penalised.
mark scheme, which reinforces
the correct answer or in itself
constitutes an alternative correct
answer:
(b) Extra material which constitutes The examiner needs to decide, by consulting the transcript/text and the Team Leader if necessary,
an alternative answer, but which whether the alternative answer constitutes:
is not explicitly mentioned in (i) an alternative correct answer, in which case this falls into category (a) and the answer should be
the mark scheme: rewarded, or
(ii) an answer which on its own would be rejected, in which case this falls into category (c) and the
answer should be rejected.
(c) Extra material which constitutes This puts the examiner in the position of having to ‘choose’ which the intended answer is. The
an alternative answer examiner cannot therefore be sure what the candidate has understood and the mark cannot be
specifically rejected in the mark awarded.
scheme:
(d) Extra material which distorts or This affects communication. The examiner cannot be sure what the candidate has understood and
contradicts the correct answer: therefore the mark cannot be awarded.
(e) Extra material introduced by the This affects communication. The examiner cannot be sure what the candidate has understood and
candidate and which does not therefore the mark cannot be awarded. It can sometimes be difficult to draw the line between what
feature in the original text: is a deduction made by an able candidate on the basis of what they have read and pure guesswork.
Therefore, where a particular answer is not covered by the mark scheme, the examiner should
consult the Team Leader.
6(f) près de chez lui/Serge/sa maison 1 Refuse le jardin public près de chez lui
2 ne pas/jamais abandonner 1