Competing with Nike - A Strategic Approach for Adidas

Course Title: Marketing Management

Submission Date: September 3, 2023

The athletic apparel industry is fiercely competitive, with Nike leading the way.

This case study examines how Adidas, one of Nike's chief competitors in the global

athletic apparel and footwear industry, faces a formidable challenge in trying to

compete with the dominance and success of the Nike brand. By analyzing Nike's core

marketing strategy, including its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, we

aim to develop strategic approaches for Adidas. From athlete partnerships to global

expansion and innovation, Adidas has opportunities to compete head-on with Nike,

striving to capture a larger market share. This study offers insights and

recommendations to help Adidas carve its place in the athletic apparel industry

alongside the iconic Nike.

Key Success Factors for Nike

Nike's success can be attributed to several key factors. First and foremost, the

company's commitment to designing high-quality and innovative athletic footwear

and apparel has been a cornerstone of its success. Nike's founder, Philip Knight,

recognized the potential of importing high-tech shoes at competitive prices, catering

to serious athletes. Furthermore, the "pyramid of influence" strategy, where top

athletes' preferences influenced others, helped build a loyal consumer base. The

strategic use of athlete endorsements, starting with Steve Prefontaine and later

Michael Jordan, played a pivotal role in establishing Nike as a symbol of superior

performance. Nike's iconic "Just Do It" campaign and its ability to adapt its marketing

strategies to resonate with different cultures and sports markets have also contributed
significantly to its global success. Additionally, Nike's expansion into emerging

markets, strategic partnerships with high-profile athletes, and continuous innovation

in technology, like the Nike+ platform, have fostered consumer loyalty and emotional

connections.

Vulnerabilities of Nike

Despite its remarkable success, Nike is not without vulnerabilities. One

significant vulnerability is its heavy reliance on athlete endorsements and sports

partnerships. While these have historically been successful, any controversies or

downturns in the careers of endorsed athletes can negatively impact the brand. For

instance, Nike's association with Lance Armstrong had to be severed due to doping

allegations. Another vulnerability lies in its image as a high-tech, performance-driven

brand, which may not resonate with consumers seeking eco-friendly and sustainable

products. Nike's minimal promotion of its sustainability efforts leaves room for

competitors to capitalize on this growing consumer trend.

Nike should Watch Out For

Nike should be cautious about several potential threats. One major concern is

increasing competition, both from traditional rivals like Adidas and emerging brands

that are gaining ground in the athletic apparel market. Rapid changes in consumer

preferences, such as a shift towards eco-friendly and sustainable products, pose a

challenge for Nike if it continues to downplay its sustainability initiatives.

Additionally, economic downturns or disruptions in the global supply chain can affect

production costs and supply availability, potentially impacting Nike's pricing strategy

and profitability.
 Recommendations for Senior Marketing Executives

Senior marketing executives at Nike should consider several recommendations

moving forward. First, they should continue to invest in innovation and technology to

maintain a competitive edge. This includes enhancing and expanding the Nike+

platform to engage consumers and collect valuable data. Second, while athlete

endorsements remain a core element of Nike's marketing strategy, diversifying into

non-athlete partnerships and collaborations can reduce reliance on individual athletes

and provide a broader appeal. Third, Nike should be more transparent about its

sustainability efforts, aligning them with its brand image and addressing consumer

concerns about eco-friendliness. Lastly, maintaining flexibility in marketing

approaches, adapting to diverse cultural contexts, and being mindful of changing

consumer trends are vital to sustaining global success.

Marketing Strategy

In their marketing efforts, Nike should ensure they continue to leverage their rich

history of athlete endorsements while also exploring partnerships beyond sports

figures. They should amplify their commitment to innovation, technology, and

consumer engagement through platforms like Nike+. Additionally, a more

pronounced emphasis on sustainability and eco-friendliness can help align the brand

with evolving consumer values. Nike should also monitor and adapt to changing

consumer preferences, staying agile in their marketing strategies to remain relevant in

diverse markets worldwide.

Nike's core marketing strategy has proven successful with its emphasis on athlete

endorsements, innovation, and international expansion. However, it also faces risks

related to over-reliance on athletes, market saturation, and environmental

sustainability concerns. To compete with Nike, Adidas could focus on differentiated

product innovation, strategic athlete partnerships, customized regional marketing,

enhancing digital presence, and promoting sustainability efforts. The athletic apparel

industry's dynamic nature requires brands like Adidas to adapt continually and

innovate to challenge Nike's market dominance effectively.

Beverland, M., Napoli, J., & Lindgreen, A. (2007). Industrial global brand

leadership: A capabilities view. Industrial marketing management, 36(8), 1082-1093.

Chong, D., & Ali, H. (2022). Literature Review: Competitive Strategy,

Competitive Advantages, and Marketing Performance on E-Commerce Shopee

Indonesia. Dinasti International Journal of Digital Business Management, 3(2), 299-

309.

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2021). Nike, Inc. – 2020 Form 10-K

Annual Report.