Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 16 views

    Final Defense Rubrics - XLSX - Group 1

    Uploaded by

    LEE
    This assessment sheet evaluates dimensions of a research project on exceptionality, including problem/aims, method, analysis, results, and conclusion. It rates each dimension on a scale from exceptional (3 points) to poor (0 points). The dimensions assess clarity of problem/aims statement, design and reporting of method, appropriateness of analysis, clear description of results and findings, and discussion of implications. Projects are given a sub-total score and final grade based on the average scores of a panel.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Final Defense Rubrics - XLSX - Group 1

    Uploaded by

    LEE
    16 views4 pages
    This assessment sheet evaluates dimensions of a research project on exceptionality, including problem/aims, method, analysis, results, and conclusion. It rates each dimension on a scale from exceptional (3 points) to poor (0 points). The dimensions assess clarity of problem/aims statement, design and reporting of method, appropriateness of analysis, clear description of results and findings, and discussion of implications. Projects are given a sub-total score and final grade based on the average scores of a panel.

    Original Title

    Final Defense Rubrics.xlsx - Group 1

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This assessment sheet evaluates dimensions of a research project on exceptionality, including problem/aims, method, analysis, results, and conclusion. It rates each dimension on a scale from exceptional (3 points) to poor (0 points). The dimensions assess clarity of problem/aims statement, design and reporting of method, appropriateness of analysis, clear description of results and findings, and discussion of implications. Projects are given a sub-total score and final grade based on the average scores of a panel.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    16 views4 pages

    Final Defense Rubrics - XLSX - Group 1

    Uploaded by

    LEE
    This assessment sheet evaluates dimensions of a research project on exceptionality, including problem/aims, method, analysis, results, and conclusion. It rates each dimension on a scale from exceptional (3 points) to poor (0 points). The dimensions assess clarity of problem/aims statement, design and reporting of method, appropriateness of analysis, clear description of results and findings, and discussion of implications. Projects are given a sub-total score and final grade based on the average scores of a panel.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 4

    Assessment Sheet

    Exceptional Good Average Poor Panel


    Dimension
    3 2 1 0
    Problem Concise and clearly Concise and Clearly Stated but difficult inferred
    stated; Rationale and Stated to understand
    significance are
    discussed

    Aims/Goal clear, concise, and Clear Vague Not Addressed


    relevant

    Method Clearly stated Design of study clearly Design of Study Design of study
    sampling procedure stated; Sampling clearly stated; sampling selection,
    and measurement procedure and Sampling selection measurement tools
    tools are clearly measurement tools procedure and and procedures were
    identified; Reliability were clearly defined; measurement vague
    and Validity were Procedures are clearly tools are stated;
    discussed stated procedures are
    difficult to
    understand

    Analysis Clear and consistent Data analysis were Data analysis is Data analysis is not
    with presented vague stated
    aims; Research design
    appropriate for type
    of data
    collected
    Result Clearly described; Results and findings Results and Results and findings
    Limitations were presented findings were were not stated
    and generalizability is vague
    discussed
    Conclusion Implication to Implication for Implication for Implication for
    professional professional professional professional
    practice is discussed; practice is described practice is vague practice is not stated
    Limitation and
    generalizability
    is discussed

    Presentation Impressive and Complete Presentation not Presentation is poor


    complete presentation completed and
    presentation within the incomplete
    required period
    Manuscript Well written, correct Clearly written; Few Vague, poor Research is
    spelling misspelled words; grammar; Did disorganized
    and grammar; Follows Few not follow
    required format formatting problems required format
    Sub-Total
    Final Grade (Total Panel Scores/No. of Panel Members)

    Recommendations
    Panel Panel
    AVE

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy