Animals 12 01402
Animals 12 01402
Animals 12 01402
Review
Dead or Alive? A Review of Perinatal Factors That Determine
Canine Neonatal Viability
Oliwia Uchańska , Małgorzata Ochota * , Maria Eberhardt and Wojciech Niżański
Department of Reproduction and Clinic of Farm Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wroclaw University of
Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-366 Wroclaw, Poland; o.uchanska@gmail.com (O.U.);
maria.eberhardt@upwr.edu.pl (M.E.); wojciech.nizanski@upwr.edu.pl (W.N.)
* Correspondence: malgorzata.ochota@upwr.edu.pl
Simple Summary: The article summarizes the current knowledge on factors related to pregnancy,
parturition, and newborns that affect the health status of a puppy and determine its chances for
survival and development. The detailed information is provided in terms of breed predispositions,
objectives of pregnancy monitoring, potential sources of complications, and veterinary advances in
care and treatment of perinatal conditions. Successful pregnancy outcomes still pose challenges in
veterinary neonatology; thus, publications presenting the current state of knowledge in this field are
in demand.
Abstract: The perinatal period has a critical impact on viability of the newborns. The variety of
factors that can potentially affect the health of a litter during pregnancy, birth, and the first weeks of
life requires proper attention from both the breeder and the veterinarian. The health status of puppies
can be influenced by various maternal factors, including breed characteristics, anatomy, quality of
nutrition, delivery assistance, neonatal care, and environmental or infectious agents encountered
Citation: Uchańska, O.; Ochota, M.;
during pregnancy. Regular examinations and pregnancy monitoring are key tools for early detection
Eberhardt, M.; Niżański, W. Dead or
of signals that can indicate disorders even before clinical signs occur. Early detection significantly
Alive? A Review of Perinatal Factors
increases the chances of puppies’ survival and proper development. The purpose of the review was
That Determine Canine Neonatal
to summarize and discuss the complex interactions between all elements that, throughout pregnancy
Viability. Animals 2022, 12, 1402.
https://doi.org/10.3390/
and the first days of life, have a tangible impact on the subsequent fate of the offspring. Many of these
ani12111402 components continue to pose challenges in veterinary neonatology; thus, publications presenting the
current state of knowledge in this field are in demand.
Academic Editors: Daniel
Mota-Rojas, Julio Martínez-Burnes
Keywords: dog; pregnancy; parturition; puppy; neonatology
and Agustín Orihuela
might be transmitted to the next generation [19]. A study comparing the fertility of bitches
undergoing surgical vaginal correction and those without surgery showed that although
there was a relatively non-significant effect on reproductive performance, pregnancy rates
were substantially lower in the group of bitches with severe abnormalities. Furthermore,
the same group of bitches showed a markedly greater predisposition to dystocia and thus
cesarean section than the group of bitches with mild abnormalities [8].
2.2. Inbreeding
When analyzing the causes that could affect the litter size, inbreeding should also be
considered. According to research, a high inbreeding rate can result in impaired fertility
and therefore a reduction in the number of pups in the litters that are born [20]. In pedigree
dogs, breeding decisions on mating closely related individuals are motivated by the need to
obtain the desired phenotype or behavioral traits, leading to genetic bottlenecks. Targeted
selection in pedigree dogs for traits of morphology and performance has greatly decreased
fertility rates, increased reproductive problems, and significantly contributed to dystocia
due to anatomical disproportions in some breeds [10]. The most notable among these
are brachycephalic breeds, in which reproduction without assisted mating and a planned
caesarean section is today almost not feasible [21]. Focusing on breeding for desired
appearance alone raises a lot of public concern today, which hopefully will lead to better
awareness and more responsible dog breeding in future.
The availability of genetic tests dedicated to particular breeds is also worth mentioning.
Today, the problem of selecting pairs of animals for breeding rests mainly on the responsible
approach of the owner, and any poorly considered actions can lead to the perpetuation of
traits detrimental to the health of dogs and the narrowing of their genetic pool [22]. The
number of breed-specific conditions increased at more than 100% between year 2013 and
2020 [23]. The range of dedicated tests for their identification is also growing steadily [23].
Among the 10 breeds for which test availability is the greatest, are Labrador Retriever,
Beagle, Australian Shepherd, German Shepherd, Standard and Miniature Poodle, Golden
Retriever, Collie, Pembroke Welsh Corgi, and Dachshund [23]. Detailed information on the
range of genetic tests for detecting inherited diseases can be accessed online at: The WSAVA-
PennGen DNA Testing Database, which is part of “A project of the WSAVA Hereditary
Disease Committee” [24].
Large litters can also be associated with risks to maternal health. Among other things,
it can be one of the factors contributing to the bitch’s disease during pregnancy and it
can increase the risk of dystocia. Gestational toxemia, for example, occurs most often
secondarily to a negative energy balance associated with inadequate nutrition and largely
with the presence of a large litter of puppies [26,27].
The importance of maternal age played a role in very young (1 year and under) and
older (6 years and older) bitches, that tend to have fewer pups (one or two) than bitches
aged 2 to 5 years [13,14]. It is worth noting here that primiparous bitches older than
6 years are predisposed to single-puppy pregnancies, uterine disorders, and prolonged
labor [3,13]. Hence, such factors would significantly increase the risk of dystocia, and it is
highly inadvisable to breed bitches over 6 years of age [13].
The mating method can also be a limiting factor in terms of the number of offspring.
The most commonly used method is natural mating or artificial insemination (AI). AI
can be intravaginal, intracervical, or surgical, using fresh, chilled, or frozen semen [28,29].
The highest efficiency in obtaining numerous litters was reported through natural mating
rather than with the artificial insemination method [11]. However, natural mating has
become less and less popular among dog breeders, mainly due to the need to travel long
distances for a chosen male. This makes breeders much more eager to choose the artificial
insemination methods and shipped semen [29]. The use of the artificial insemination
method also provides highly satisfactory results in terms of litter size, especially when
using fresh semen rather than chilled or frozen-thawed [12,30].
with excessive fetal growth (macrosomia), which contributes to dystocia and birth trauma,
and, as a result, increased maternal, fetal, and neonatal morbidity and mortality [37,38]. In
humans, the prevalence of congenital malformations is higher than in the general popula-
tion if GDM occurs early in pregnancy, but not in mid-pregnancy or later [39]. In bitches
diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus, fetal viability should be assessed regularly
with ultrasound; knowing whether the pups are large enough to be at risk of dystocia or
are no longer alive would guide treatment decisions, such as the schedule of the cesarean
section. Such puppies would be at increased risk of premature delivery if CS was decided
too early, while if delayed too long, it would lead to fatal distress and metabolic disorders.
Published reports of managing canine GDM are rare [35,36,40]. Similar to humans, in case
of GDM neonatal hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, hypocalcemia, and poor suckling can
occur more frequently in puppies, and proper management involves intensive fluid and
insulin therapy to correct water, electrolyte, acid-base, and glucose derangements [33,40].
2.4.2. Hypoluteoidism
Hypoluteoidism is described as insufficient production and secretion of progesterone
by the corpus luteum [41]. Necessary to maintain pregnancy, proper corpus luteum
function and progesterone production, if defective, can determine the fate of any pregnancy
at its very early stage. A serum progesterone level of at least 2 ng/mL is considered
by many authors to be the key to maintaining a canine pregnancy [34,42]. A decrease
in progesterone concentration below 2 ng/mL in a pregnant bitch has been shown to
lead to abortion [34,42]. Interestingly, some authors reported that miscarriage can occur
even when the progesterone level drops below 10 ng/mL [43]. Since serum progesterone
measurements can be performed using a variety of methods and devices on the market,
with RIA being considered the reference assay, the exact progesterone values may vary
between published studies and reports [44]. In all cases, the interpretation of the results
should be approached with caution and the device and method used should always be
considered when analyzing the progesterone concentration.
Distinguishing between corpus luteum insufficiency as the primary cause of fetal
death, rather than its consequence, is certainly worth attention, especially in bitches who
lose litters in the second half of pregnancy despite the exclusion of other causes. The
reasons and pathogenesis of corpus luteum insufficiency, despite many studies, are still
incompletely investigated and diagnosis often poses a problem because many factors, such
as maternal health status, fetal death, infectious agents, trauma, or poor nutrition, may
contribute to the primary decrease in progesterone level [34,45,46]. Some studies confirmed
the association of corpus luteum insufficiency with the presence of IgE antibodies against
endogenous progesterone in bitches [47]. These authors suggested a genetic link to the
occurrence of hypoluteoidism in specific breeds, such as German Shepherds.
The diagnosis of primary corpus luteum insufficiency as a cause of pregnancy loss
is complex. It requires confirmation of a gradual decrease in progesterone levels while
assessing fetal viability. The possibility that the decrease in serum progesterone levels
occurred due to fetal distress or abortion must be excluded. The function of the corpus
luteum can be influenced by many endo- and exogenous factors that control its lifespan, and
among the most important substances with luteolytic effects are PGF2a and antigestagens
such as aglepristone [46,48].
If the diagnosis is confirmed, exogenous progestin supplementation therapy is rec-
ommended, of which medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), alternogest, or progesterone
in oil are the most commonly used in dogs [34,49]. The administration of progestins in
pregnant bitches may be associated with side effects such as the development of pyometra,
septicemia, or placentitis, and the risk of prolonged pregnancy-causing dystocia [34,42,50].
Furthermore, progestogens, which have androgenic effects, may lead to masculinization of
female fetuses [42].
Animals 2022, 12, 1402 6 of 26
Recently, the first documented case of mammary gland fibroadenoma in dogs, so far
reported only in cats, has also been described. An Istrian Shorthaired Hound bitch was
diagnosed with primary corpus luteum insufficiency in three consecutive pregnancies [51].
Based on the diagnosis established during the first pregnancy, in the second one with re-
peated suspicion of corpus luteum insufficiency, the bitch was treated with 1.65 mg/kg of
progesterone in oil intramuscularly (PROGEST-E® , Fort Dodge Animal Health S.p.A., Bologna,
Italy) daily, from day 19 to day 22, and every 48 h from day 23 to day 58. During the third
pregnancy, based on previous experience, the bitch also received 0.075 mg/kg alternogest
(Regumate® , Intervet Italia S.r.l., Peschiera Borromeo, MI, Italy) from day 8 and then every
24 h until day 52 of pregnancy. The dose was reduced to 0.058 mg/kg PO from day 53 to
day 57 [51]. Both times, an increase in the size of the mammary glands was observed. One
of the pregnancies required a cesarean section due to fetal macrosomia. Whereas, females
born in the other pregnancy, according to the owner’s report, showed no signs of estrus cycle
during the first 3 years of life; moreover, in one female, clitoral hypertrophy and a blindly
ending vagina were diagnosed. Such abnormalities may be related to progestin treatment
in the embryogenesis stage, as they affect the development of the genital tract. If progestins
are used as a supplemental treatment for hypoluteoidism, administration should not begin
before days 30–35 to avoid genital abnormalities [49,52]. Since hypoluteoidism is an ovarian
dysfunction and its treatment with progestins might lead to severe unwarranted effects, it is
recommended to exclude affected bitches from breeding.
2.4.3. Hypothyroidism
An equally interesting topic is the relation between pregnancy and hypothyroidism.
In general, hypothyroidism is a common endocrine disease in dogs. Many previous studies
have demonstrated a heritable tendency in dogs of certain breeds, such as Toy Fox Terriers,
Giant Schnauzers, Boxers, or Scottish Deerhounds [53]. Bitches with untreated hypothy-
roidism often exhibit a significant reduction in fertility that prevents natural pregnancy, as
well as variable interestrus intervals, abortions, and stillbirths [54]. Studies have shown
that they are also at risk of developing dystocia as a result of a prolonged duration of labor
contractions and a decrease in their intensity. Puppies have been reported to have a higher
incidence of low birth weight, low viability, and overall increased litter mortality [54]. The
situation changed when levothyroxine supplementation was started, which was shown
to reverse the negative effect of hormone deprivation on neonates’ birth weight and high
mortality [55]. The question of changes that occur in thyroid hormone concentrations
during the course of pregnancy in bitches certainly requires further study. Some data
indicated insignificant fluctuations that do not require adaptive hormonal supplementa-
tion during pregnancy [56,57]. In contrast, others suggested that significant changes may
occur, especially during the second half of pregnancy, when the rate of fetal development
increases, and therefore the rate of maternal metabolism should follow to meet the energy
demands [42,58]. The same is true in human pregnancy, where adequate supplementation
during pregnancy is necessary for its maintenance and must be gradually increased, as well
as the fetal development and metabolic rates [59]. In bitches experiencing miscarriage, a
significant decrease in thyroid hormones and a correlating decrease in progesterone levels
were observed even one week before the first clinical symptoms [42]. The problem of
levothyroxine supplementation recommendations and the need to increase the dose with
the progression of pregnancy certainly require further research and attention; this is still
a matter of debate according to different study results [56–58], because decisions made
during treatment can have a significant impact on the outcome of the bitch’s pregnancy
and therefore the health status of the whole litter.
Animals 2022, 12, 1402 7 of 26
If possible, the litter should be weaned permanently and hand-reared to prevent the risk of
hypocalcemia relapse.
Another nutrient that has also attracted interest is folic acid, recommended for preg-
nant women. Experiments conducted on mice as experimental animal models also demon-
strated that folic acid is necessary for normal embryonic-fetal development [72,73]. Some
studies have shown its important role in the prevention of cleft lip and/or palate in
brachycephalic puppies [74–76]. However, no similar relationship was proven in a study
conducted on bitches of breeds considered as non-predisposed (Labrador, Golden Retriever,
and Labrador/Golden crosses) to the cleft palate problem [77]. If considering supplemen-
tation in dogs, studies suggest one should start folic acid when a bitch is intended for
breeding/enters the estrus phase, since the medullary tube closes during the first part of
gestation to reduce the risk of developing cleft lip or palate [66].
The crucial importance of a proper diet for the health of the pregnant bitch and her
offspring remains undisputed. In addition to portioning daily food intake and administer-
ing it in appropriate amounts to avoid excessive weight gain, the trend of administering
certain supplements deserves attention, especially calcium and folic acid supplementation.
A rational approach to the use of nutritional supplements and the application of sound
feeding practices are key aspects in providing adequate care to the pregnant bitch.
values [85]. This is especially the case when combined with Doppler examination, which
enables one to visualize and compare the blood flow of the uteroplacental and umbilical
arteries in normal and abnormal conceptus [78]. Accurate understanding of the changes
that occur can contribute to early diagnosis for identification and, if possible, exclusion of
the problem to ensure the safety of the developing offspring.
3. Type of Delivery, Perinatal Complications, and Proper Management of the Bitch and
Her Offspring
3.1. Normal Parturition
The pregnancy in the bitch is expected to last between 57 and 72 days from the day of
mating [40,86]. Estimating the exact date of parturition in dogs is sometimes difficult. The
timing of ovulation is usually delayed in relation to both the LH surge and the liberation of
the immature ovum, which needs to mature further to be competent for fertilization in the
oviduct [87]. It is also necessary to consider the 24–48 h period in which the ovum can be
fertilized and the survival of the sperm in the reproductive tract, depending on the date of
mating or the type of insemination.
Serum P4 concentration is considered an essential parameter for the detection of the
LH peak, ovulation, and parturition date. Serum P4 concentration begins to increase before
the onset of the luteal phase, and the first day when P4 is >1.5 ng/mL is considered to
indicate the peak of LH [88]. On the day of ovulation, which occurs almost 48–60 h after the
peak of LH, the length of pregnancy is reported to be 63 ± 1 days (62–64 days) [40,88]. The
accuracy of parturition timing using prebreeding P4 concentration is described to be 67,
90, and 100% within 65 ± 1, ±2, and ±3 days, respectively [88]. Instead, vaginal cytology
for continuous monitoring of the reproductive cycle could be helpful in determining the
appropriate time to start serum P4 monitoring [86]. Vaginal cytology can also be used to
determine the first day of diestrus (D1), after which the pregnancy should last 57 ± 3 days
(54–60 days) [86]. The determination of D1 does not present difficulties because the image
in this phase of the cycle clearly differs from that in estrus by the decrease in the percentage
of cornified cells from 80–100% to at least 20%, and the appearance of parabasal cells and
neutrophils. These changes occur in less than 24–48 h [86].
A normal parturition in a dam is divided into three phases. In phase one, the pro-
gesterone block is lifted with the onset of uterine contractions and cervical dilation. The
duration varies between 6 and 24 h, possibly up to 36 in a primiparous or very nervous
bitch [40]. During the second phase of labor, uterine contractions are combined with abdom-
inal wall contractions, and the fetuses are expelled sequentially from the uterus. Although
there may be a longer interval between the first and subsequent pups, births usually occur
every 15 to 120 min, depending on the size and breed of the mother and the number of
puppies. The third phase involves placental expulsion and occurs immediately or within
15 min after the birth of each pup [40]. However, several placentas may be delivered at
once [89].
section on the health of puppies, two key things should be remembered. One is related to
whether the cesarean section is performed as an emergency or a scheduled procedure, and
the other is the type of anesthetic protocol used during the intervention.
For brachycephalic breeds born by cesarean section, an exclusive scale has been
designed for the evaluation of brachycephalic newborns [95]. The scale was specially
modified after the Veronesi et al. scoring system and adapted to their characteristics due to
the lower degree of vitality after birth often observed in newborns of these breeds. A heart
rate above 180 bpm gets 2 points, between 120 and 180 gets 1 point, and below 120 gets 0
points [95]. Other parameters including respiratory effort, reflex irritability, motility and
mucus color are scored the same as in the APGAR scale proposed by Veronesi et al. [94].
Neonatal viability reflexes (NVR) can also be assessed. The purpose of this scale is
to evaluate a newborn’s postnatal depression based on active searching for the mammary
gland and the strength of the sucking, measured as weak, moderate, or normal [5].
These reflexes are essential in the early postnatal period to ensure newborn feeding
and survival. The suckling reflex can be assessed by inserting the gloved tip of the smallest
digit into the mouth of the neonate and checking the suckling force; it can be described
as strong (5 suckles/min), weak (>3 suckles/min) or absent. The rooting reflex can be
assessed by approaching the nose of the neonate with the forefinger and thumb shaped
into a circle and checking whether the neonate inserts its nose into this circle; immediate,
slow or absent muzzle fitting inside the circle can be observed. The righting reflex of the
neonate can be evaluated by placing it on its back on a soft surface and verifying whether
it is able to return to the sternal recumbence. Those reflexes are also scored from 0 to 2
points, and the interpretation is as follows: 0–2 points: weak viability; 3–4 points: moderate
viability; 5–6 means normal viability. Weak reflexes are often the primary sign of hypoxia
in puppies [5].
The better the viability of the newborn, the higher score it receives on each scale
mentioned above, and therefore the prognosis of its short-term survival would be better.
The transient decline in vital functions immediately after birth is often observed even
in eutocic pups [5]. Healthy newborns quickly regain their vitality; however, due to the
special vulnerability in the first few hours of life, each should receive special attention and
care. The critical and weak puppies (0–6 on the APGAR score) need even more attention
and care, as they are much more likely to have a fatal outcome within the first 2 h of life [5].
To increase the chances for survival of weak newborns, prompt and efficient resuscita-
tion is crucial. The protocol proposed by Traas et al. adopted the following sequence of
actions according to their importance: warmth, airway, breathing, circulation, and drug
administration [96]. In each case, the treatment should consist of clearing airways, drying of
a puppy, respiratory stimulation (cardiopulmonary resuscitation), oxygenation, ventilation
by a mask or endotracheal tube and, when necessary, fluid administration [5,96]. Intra-
venous administration of drugs such as doxapram, aminophylline, or epinephrine could
also be considered [96]. Naloxone can be given to reverse the anesthetic effect of opioids ad-
ministered to the dam prior to the cesarean section. In distressed newborns at risk of sepsis
due to hypoxia-induced bacterial translocation, the administration of safe antibiotics (these
include cephalosporins, penicillins, clavulanic acid, macrolides, trimethoprim-sulfonamide,
and amikacin) should be considered [18,96].
Blood glucose measurements are also helpful in assessing the risk in frail puppies.
Hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL) within the first 8 h of life was associated with high mortality
in newborns during the first 24 h of life. At 24 h of life, the level of 92 mg/dL or below was
associated with a higher risk of mortality during the entire neonatal period (1–21 days) [4].
A second useful parameter for predicting neonatal mortality within the first 48 h of
life is the lactate level. Its concentration in the umbilical cord blood reflects the presence of
acidosis in a neonate, with high levels noted in distressed pups and low levels in healthy,
vigorous ones [97]. Both parameters combined with the neonatal APGAR score can be a
useful tool for the early identification of weak newborns that require special care, thus
reducing neonatal mortality.
Animals 2022, 12, 1402 13 of 26
Awareness must also be given to the fact that each evaluation should always be
objectively performed by experienced practitioners. Low scores do not always determine
a negative outcome for a puppy; however, high neonatal mortality is more frequently
correlated with it [90]. When performing a viability evaluation, each newborn should also
be checked for the presence of birth defects such as cleft lip/palate, presence of a hernia, or
atresia ani.
was recorded at 61.4%, while from day 3 to day 30 it was 38.6%. In the vast majority of cases,
single malformations were present [104]; much less frequently, simultaneous occurrence
of two or more in one fetus was observed [105]. The risk of malformations is much more
common in pedigree dogs, and the brachycephalic dogs are among the most predisposed
breeds [2,21]. The accumulation of genetic defects over the years due to inbreeding or
selective breeding leads to reduced genetic diversity and increased predisposition of these
animals to present anatomical anomalies [10]. However, not all anomalies are associated
with an increased risk of mortality. For example, puppies born with additional fingers
(polydactyly) are unlikely to suffer from other health problems. The vast majority of
congenital malformations do, however, have a marked effect on longevity; in the case of
anasarca, hydrocephalus, cleft palate, atrophied intestine fragments, or atresia ani, the life
span will be substantially affected. Puppies with a cleft palate often develop aspiration
pneumonia due to milk entering the airways during sucking [106]. Those with intestinal
fragment atrophy are unable to pass meconium and feces, which initially leads to painful
constipation and over time death [107]. For some anatomical malformations, surgical
correction may be considered. For example cleft palate surgery [106,108] and surgical
operation of the posterior gastrointestinal obstruction [107,109] have been reported with
variable success. However, in most cases and with significant severity of defects, euthanasia
of affected puppies is often chosen to avoid unnecessary suffering.
The diagnosis of malformations is often difficult and many of them remain undetected
mainly due to a lack of clinical examination or inaccurate clinical examination or the initial
absence of clinical signs. Investigation of malformations in newborns immediately after
birth is fundamental because an early diagnosis of these conditions could lead to timely
clinical interventions and help to minimize mortality.
4.3.1. Hypoxia
Hypoxia is the first emerging state responsible for 60% of all neonatal deaths. The
oxygen deficits in neonates usually start from the dysfunction of umbilical circulation that
can be caused by prolonged and/or complicated parturition, i.e., umbilical cord vessel
compression or rupture, as well as too early placental detachment while a puppy is still in
the birth canal [92]. In addition, it was reported that puppies born in posterior presentation
were more susceptible to respiratory and metabolic acidosis than those born in anterior
presentation [123]. Furthermore, administration of oxytocin, anesthetic agents, surgical
preparation, and the cesarean section may also contribute to newborn hypoxia [92]. Mildly
hypoxic neonates are able to shift circulating blood from intestines, kidneys, spleen, or
skin and towards heart, brain, diaphragm, and adrenal glands. Severe oxygen deprivation
decreases fetal heartbeat, leading to tissue hypoxia and ischemia and finally multiorgan
failure. Affected puppies are more prone to amniotic fluid aspiration, and their mucous
membranes become less resistant to the pathogens’ penetration [92].
4.3.2. Hypothermia
The next noninfectious condition that may threaten the life of the newborn is hypother-
mia. Immediately after birth, any neonate is introduced into the adversely cool environment
in comparison to the intrauterine conditions [111,124]. The cooling sensation is escalated
by the amniotic fluid residuals. Hypothermia could lead to a significant drop in the heart
rate (200–250 bpm at 35.6 ◦ C vs. 40–50 bpm at 21.1 ◦ C), respiratory rate decrease, and
loss of suckling reflex, which in turn can cause dehydration and gastrointestinal disorders.
Such puppies would be much more susceptible to infections (e.g. herpes virus, bacteria,
and opportunistic pathogens) [92]. As thermoregulation is not fully developed in newborn
puppies and they are not able to shiver until day 7 of life, to compensate for the temperature
loss, they can only use the high energy-consuming thermal conduction [111]. Therefore,
the body temperature of a puppy strictly depends on the efficiency of the mother’s care. If
the dam’s maternal instincts are inadequate, the proper room temperature and additional
heat sources are essential for puppies’ survival [111].
4.3.3. Hypoglycemia
Hypoglycemia might be the consequence of the low core temperature or occur sepa-
rately with the suckling failure due to a variety of reasons. A neonate is born with immature
liver and the energy stored as hepatic glycogen is usually enough only for the first day of
life [92,125]. Moreover, some factors such as mother’s malnutrition or insufficient nutrition
during pregnancy could reduce the newborn’s glycogen supplies. Within 8–12 h after being
born, a puppy is forced to rely on colostrum/milk intake to maintain the proper glucose
blood level. Reduced or no food intake would result in rapid glycogen reserves depletion
and the development of hypoglycemia with typical symptoms of nervousness, vocalization,
Animals 2022, 12, 1402 16 of 26
irritability, and intense hunger that, if not corrected, would be followed by lethargy, mental
dullness, depression or stupor, seizures, tremors, and finally the death of the puppy [92]. It
is worth noticing that the severity of hypoglycemia symptoms does not always correspond
to relatively low blood glucose levels. Moreover, the clinical condition reflects the puppy’s
energy reserve. That explains why empirically based treatment with intravenous or oral or
glucose in many cases does not lead to a clinical improvement in the neonate [123].
4.3.4. Dehydration
Dehydration represents another homeostatic disorder which is usually a result of a
non-properly functioning excretory system, but can also occur with inadequate milk intake.
Newborn’s kidneys are not fully developed at birth and need a minimum 2–3 weeks to
undergo nephrogenesis to become fully functional [111,125]. The early kidney filtration is
characterized by a slow clearance of fluids, increased sodium loss, and, most importantly,
the inability to conserve water. That is why neonates are extremely susceptible to dehy-
dration [111]. It is important to remember that water turnover rate in pups is double than
in adult dogs and they demand an intake of approximately 132–220 mL/kg/day [111].
Usually, a sick puppy, independently of cause, brought to a veterinary clinic presents a set
of common symptoms such as low body temperature, malnutrition, and dehydration [111].
similar age to ensure sufficient immune protection [130]. It was also reported that the oral
administration of canine serum immediately after birth resulted in sufficient protective
IgG level (2.3 g/L) in puppies’ serum [131]. It is recommended that plasma donors live in
the same environment. Moreover, promising results were obtained with the use of serum
containing specific antibodies against common canine pathogens [131]. Many products
are available on the market; unfortunately, no milk substitute can completely replace the
colostrum or natural milk. Immunoglobulins present in some of the formulae can, to some
extent, replace the effect of colostrum by coating the intestinal epithelium and creating
a barrier against pathogens’ adhesion and translocation to the bloodstream [131]. Some
authors also suggested the establishment of dog colostrum banks, similar to farm animals’
husbandry [131].
5. Infectious Factors
A physiologically immature puppy without proper neonatal care will be more prone
to suffer from inadequate colostrum intake, and thus will have deficient immunity and
increased risk of infection. A bitch may come into contact with different microorganisms at
different stages of life. The outcome of pregnancy and the viability of the offspring are most
influenced by dams’ immunization (vaccinations), mating hygiene, care during pregnancy
and perinatal period, as well as the conditions in which the mother and her puppies are
housed for the first few weeks of their lives. Infectious agents are considered the second
main cause of a high mortality rate after dystocia [92]. Microorganisms can be transmitted
from bitch to pups during pregnancy through the placenta, during delivery, and later from
vaginal and oronasal discharges, feces, urine, or milk [135].
Animals 2022, 12, 1402 18 of 26
cause miscarriage. Fetal resorptions and sudden infant death have also been reported [151].
T. gondii has also been isolated from pups of seropositive dams without clinical signs [150].
Toxoplasmosis is frequently associated with secondary infections in dogs. When combined
with viral infections, such as the distemper virus (CDV), it can cause the death of the
entire litter due to a complete immune failure in very young animals (up to 30 days of
age) [152]. The second intracellular parasite is the protozoan Neospora caninum [153]. Dogs
can be intermediate or definitive hosts, while infection occurs mainly through contact with
contaminated water or food containing cysts. The horizontal transmission of the parasite
from mother to fetus through the placenta is also possible [153]. Robbe et al. reported that
pregnancy might be a predisposing factor for the Neospora caninum infection, which usually
results in abortion or the birth of weak puppies that die shortly after [154]. In Australia, a
case of a bulldog litter born from a seropositive mother was reported, in which one of the
seven pups died from a multisystemic infection caused by Neospora caninum [155]. The pup
was the smallest of the litter and was reported to have signs of weakness, lack of sucking
reflex, and difficulty breathing. When necropsy was performed, diffuse pulmonary edema,
inflammatory changes in internal organs, and acute myocarditis were detected. Studies
conducted in Italy [154], Iran [156], Brazil [157], and Australia [158] indicated that parasitic
diseases in breeding dogs are underestimated and often overlooked despite the significant
prevalence of toxoplasmosis and neosporosis in the companion dog population. It should
be noted that they are related to the trend of feeding raw animal meat in the BARF diet,
which, at least for this reason, should not be recommended for feeding pregnant females,
as it can be a potential source of infection with these protozoa [159,160].
6. Conclusions
The neonatal period is a challenging time of adaptation for any puppy to life outside
their mother’s body. In our review, we have discussed a variety of factors that affect puppy
viability in the early stages of life. The order of discussion was guided by the natural course
of pregnancy, birth, and the neonatal period. The viability of puppies depends first on the
health of the mother and the environment that affects her in different ways, and then on
the maturity of the adaptive mechanisms developed by those puppies during embryonic
and fetal development.
For the early detection of the first signs of any emerging abnormality, the fundamental
factor is conducting examinations and observing the pregnant bitch. Regular ultrasound
and electrocardiographic monitoring enable rapid diagnosis of abnormalities, which, in
turn, increases the chance of effective implementation of therapeutic measures [5,78–82,84].
This is especially true in the case of potential perinatal complications, because the impact
of delivery on pup viability should always be kept in mind. The emergency cesarean
section carries far greater risks than natural birth or planned surgery, and delaying the
decision can often be fatal to the viability of the pups [5]. Therefore, the safest solution
would be a planned cesarean section in the case of bitches known to be prone to perinatal
complications, either due to breed predisposition or previous history. After the surgery, it is
necessary to perform a quick evaluation of newborns, usually using the modified APGAR
score [94] and the NVR [5], which are highly effective in identifying weak pups that require
special care.
The cesarean section is also a challenging procedure due to the adequate intra- and
postoperative care. For the safety of milk-sucking puppies, medications given to the mother
are often highly restricted. However, after all, they are essential for dams’ welfare and
could significantly reflect the quality of care a female provides for her puppies [100,133,134].
In the authors’ opinion, the problem of providing adequate analgesia protection to the bitch
after a cesarean section is urgent and certainly requires further research to improve current
surgical protocols. However, it should be remembered that once a puppy does not take
milk, especially not colostrum, the risk of developing immunity problems would increase.
Any factors that weaken a newborn’s immunity drastically increase its susceptibility to
Animals 2022, 12, 1402 20 of 26
infections. Thus, it is crucial to provide diligent care and hygiene for the bitch and her
offspring. The risk of certain infections can be reduced through regular vaccinations.
In conclusion, all collected information focuses on factors influencing the viability of
puppies during their most critical infancy period. The authors hope that this review would
be helpful both for scientists and practitioners to grasp the picture of the vastness of the
interrelationships during the perinatal period that determine neonatal health and welfare. It
should also be mentioned that canine reproduction currently focuses on pedigree dogs only.
Hence, inbreeding and focusing solely on exterior characteristics significantly increased
susceptibility to perinatal complications [10]. This leads to a situation observed more
and more often nowadays, where reproduction in some breeds, mainly brachycephalic, is
impossible due to their anatomy and physiology, without medical assistance performed
by veterinarians [21]. The ethics of such a practice is difficult to assess due to divergent
opinions among scientists, physicians, and breeders involved in small animal reproduc-
tion [17,161]. Cooperation between science and veterinary medicine can contribute to a
more effective accumulation of knowledge in the field of canine neonatology and thus a
further improvement in the quality of services provided.
References
1. O’neill, D.G.; O’sullivan, A.M.; Manson, E.A.; Church, D.B.; Boag, A.K.; Mcgreevy, P.D.; Brodbelt, D.C. Canine Dystocia in 50 UK
First-Opinion Emergency Care Veterinary Practices: Prevalence and Risk Factors. Vet. Rec. 2017, 181, 88. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. O’Neill, D.G.; O’Sullivan, A.M.; Manson, E.A.; Church, D.B.; McGreevy, P.D.; Boag, A.K.; Brodbelt, D.C. Canine Dystocia in 50
UK First-Opinion Emergency Care Veterinary Practices: Clinical Management and Outcomes. Vet. Rec. 2019, 184, 409. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
3. Münnich, A.; Küchenmeister, U. Dystocia in Numbers-Evidence-Based Parameters for Intervention in the Dog: Causes for
Dystocia and Treatment Recommendations. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2009, 44, 141–147. [CrossRef]
4. Mila, H.; Grellet, A.; Delebarre, M.; Mariani, C.; Feugier, A.; Chastant-Maillard, S. Monitoring of the Newborn Dog and Prediction
of Neonatal Mortality. Prev. Vet. Med. 2017, 143, 11–20. [CrossRef]
5. Vassalo, F.G.; Simões, C.R.B.; Sudano, M.J.; Prestes, N.C.; Lopes, M.D.; Chiacchio, S.B.; Lourenço, M.L.G. Topics in the Routine
Assessment of Newborn Puppy Viability. Top. Companion Anim. Med. 2015, 30, 16–21. [CrossRef]
6. Cornelius, A.J.; Moxon, R.; Russenberger, J.; Havlena, B.; Cheong, S.H. Identifying Risk Factors for Canine Dystocia and Stillbirths.
Theriogenology 2019, 128, 201–206. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7. Eneroth, A.; Linde-Forsberg, C.; Uhlhorn, M.; Hall, M. Radiographic Pelvimetry for Assessment of Dystocia in Bitches: A Clinical
Study in Two Terrier Breeds. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1999, 40, 257–264. [CrossRef]
8. Moxon, R.; England, G.C.W. Fertility and Whelping Complications in Bitches Following Correction of Vaginal Abnormalities. Vet.
Rec. 2011, 168, 642. [CrossRef]
9. Dobak, T.P.; Voorhout, G.; Vernooij, J.C.M.; Boroffka, S.A.E.B. Computed Tomographic Pelvimetry in English Bulldogs. Theri-
ogenology 2018, 118, 144–149. [CrossRef]
10. Marelli, S.P.; Beccaglia, M.; Bagnato, A.; Strillacci, M.G. Canine Fertility: The Consequences of Selection for Special Traits. Reprod.
Domest. Anim. 2020, 55, 4–9. [CrossRef]
11. Borge, K.S.; Tønnessen, R.; Nødtvedt, A.; Indrebø, A. Litter Size at Birth in Purebred Dogs—A Retrospective Study of 224 Breeds.
Theriogenology 2011, 75, 911–919. [CrossRef]
12. Hollinshead, F.K.; Hanlon, D.W. Factors Affecting the Reproductive Performance of Bitches: A Prospective Cohort Study
Involving 1203 Inseminations with Fresh and Frozen Semen. Theriogenology 2017, 101, 62–72. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Animals 2022, 12, 1402 21 of 26
13. Tønnessen, R.; Borge, K.S.; Nødtvedt, A.; Indrebø, A. Canine Perinatal Mortality: A Cohort Study of 224 Breeds. Theriogenology
2012, 77, 1788–1801. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Chastant-Maillard, S.; Guillemot, C.; Feugier, A.; Mariani, C.; Grellet, A.; Mila, H. Reproductive Performance and Pre-Weaning
Mortality: Preliminary Analysis of 27,221 Purebred Female Dogs and 204,537 Puppies in France. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2017, 52,
158–162. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15. Frehner, B.L.; Reichler, I.M.; Keller, S.; Goericke-Pesch, S.; Balogh, O. Blood Calcium, Glucose and Haematology Profiles of
Parturient Bitches Diagnosed with Uterine Inertia or Obstructive Dystocia. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2018, 53, 680–687. [CrossRef]
16. Bergström, A.; Nødtvedt, A.; Lagerstedt, A.S.; Egenvall, A. Incidence and Breed Predilection for Dystocia and Risk Factors for
Cesarean Section in a Swedish Population of Insured Dogs. Vet. Surg. 2006, 35, 786–791. [CrossRef]
17. Farstad, W. Ethics in Animal Breeding. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2018, 53, 4–13. [CrossRef]
18. Johnston, S.D.; Root Kustritz, M.V.; Olson, P.N.S. Canine and Feline Theriogenology; Saunders: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2001; ISBN
0721656072.
19. Arlt, S.P.; Rohne, J.; Ebert, A.D.; Heuwieser, W. Endoscopic Resection of a Vaginal Septum in a Bitch and Observation of Septa in
Two Related Bitches. N. Z. Vet. J. 2012, 60, 258–260. [CrossRef]
20. Schrack, J.; Dolf, G.; Reichler, I.M.; Schelling, C. Factors Influencing Litter Size and Puppy Losses in the Entlebucher Mountain
Dog. Theriogenology 2017, 95, 163–170. [CrossRef]
21. De Cramer, K.G.M.; Nöthling, J.O. Towards Scheduled Pre-Parturient Caesarean Sections in Bitches. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2020,
55, 38–48. [CrossRef]
22. Bovenkerk, B.; Nijland, H.J. The Pedigree Dog Breeding Debate in Ethics and Practice: Beyond Welfare Arguments. J. Agric.
Environ. Ethics 2017, 30, 387–412. [CrossRef]
23. Rokhsar, J.L.; Canino, J.; Raj, K.; Yuhnke, S.; Slutsky, J.; Giger, U. Web Resource on Available DNA Variant Tests for Hereditary
Diseases and Genetic Predispositions in Dogs and Cats: An Update. Hum. Genet. 2021, 140, 1505–1515. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24. The WSAVA-PennGen DNA Testing Database. Available online: http://research.vet.upenn.edu/WSAVA-LabSearch (accessed on
17 May 2022).
25. Forsberg, C.L.; Persson, G. A Survey of Dystocia in the Boxer Breed. Acta Vet. Scand. 2007, 49, 8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
26. Lamm, C.G.; Njaa, B.L. Clinical Approach to Abortion, Stillbirth, and Neonatal Death in Dogs and Cats. Vet. Clin. North Am.-Small
Anim. Pract. 2012, 42, 501–513. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
27. Dejneka, J.G.; Ochota, M.; Bielas, W.; Niżański, W. Dystocia after Unwanted Mating as One of the Risk Factors in Non-Spayed
Bitches—A Retrospective Study. Animals 2020, 10, 1697. [CrossRef]
28. Mason, S.J.; Rous, N.R. Comparison of Endoscopic-Assisted Transcervical and Laparotomy Insemination with Frozen-Thawed
Dog Semen: Aretrospective Clinical Study. Theriogenology 2014, 82, 844–850. [CrossRef]
29. Mason, S.J. Current Review of Artificial Insemination in Dogs. Vet. Clin. North Am.-Small Anim. Pract. 2018, 48, 567–580.
[CrossRef]
30. Nizański, W. Intravaginal Insemination of Bitches with Fresh and Frozen-Thawed Semen with Addition of Prostatic Fluid: Use of
an Infusion Pipette and the Osiris Catheter. Theriogenology 2006, 66, 470–483. [CrossRef]
31. Lamm, C.G.; Makloski, C.L. Current Advances in Gestation and Parturition in Cats and Dogs. Vet. Clin. North Am.-Small Anim.
Pract. 2012, 42, 445–456. [CrossRef]
32. Nak, D.; Nak, Y.; Shahzad, A.H. Pregnancy Toxemia in a Golden Retriever Bitch, a Case Report. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2020, 8,
1184–1187. [CrossRef]
33. Balogh, O.; Bruckmaier, R.; Keller, S.; Reichler, I.M. Effect of Maternal Metabolism on Fetal Supply: Glucose, Non-Esterified Fatty
Acids and Beta-Hydroxybutyrate Concentrations in Canine Maternal Serum and Fetal Fluids at Term Pregnancy. Anim. Reprod.
Sci. 2018, 193, 209–216. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
34. Johnson, C.A. High-Risk Pregnancy and Hypoluteoidism in the Bitch. Theriogenology 2008, 70, 1424–1430. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
35. Nelson, R.W.; Reusch, C.E. Animal Models of Disease: Classification and Etiology of Diabetes in Dogs and Cats. J. Endocrinol.
2014, 222, T1–T9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
36. Fall, T.; Johansson Kreuger, S.; Juberget, Å.; Bergström, A.; Hedhammar, Å. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in 13 Dogs. J. Vet. Intern.
Med. 2008, 22, 1296–1300. [CrossRef]
37. Johns, E.C.; Denison, F.C.; Norman, J.E.; Reynolds, R.M. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Mechanisms, Treatment, and Complica-
tions. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 29, 743–754. [CrossRef]
38. Szmuilowicz, E.D.; Josefson, J.L.; Metzger, B.E. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am. 2019, 48, 479–493.
[CrossRef]
39. Johnson, C.A. Glucose Homeostasis during Canine Pregnancy: Insulin Resistance, Ketosis, and Hypoglycemia. Theriogenology
2008, 70, 1418–1423. [CrossRef]
40. Norman, E.J.; Wolsky, K.G.; MacKay, G.A. Pregnancy-Related Diabetes Mellitus in Two Dogs. N. Z. Vet. J. 2006, 54, 360–364.
[CrossRef]
41. Arlt, S.P. The Bitch around Parturition. Theriogenology 2020, 150, 452–457. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
42. Hinderer, J.; Lüdeke, J.; Riege, L.; Haimerl, P.; Bartel, A.; Kohn, B.; Weber, C.; Müller, E.; Arlt, S.P. Progesterone Concentrations
during Canine Pregnancy. Animals 2021, 11, 3369. [CrossRef]
Animals 2022, 12, 1402 22 of 26
43. Thuróczy, J.; Müller, L.; Kollár, E.; Balogh, L. Theriogenology Thyroxin and Progesterone Concentrations in Pregnant, Nonpreg-
nant Bitches, and Bitches during Abortion. Theriogenology 2016, 85, 1186–1191. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
44. Hussein, H.A.; Schuler, G.; Conze, T.; Wehrend, A. Comparison of Three Progesterone Quantification Methods Using Blood
Samples Drawn from Bitches during the Periovulatory Phase. Vet. World 2022, 15, 119–123. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
45. Ilicic, M.; Zakar, T.; Paul, J.W. Epigenetic Regulation of Progesterone Receptors and the Onset of Labour. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2019,
31, 1035–1048. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
46. Papa, P.C.; Kowalewski, M.P. Factors Affecting the Fate of the Canine Corpus Luteum: Potential Contributors to Pregnancy and
Non-Pregnancy. Theriogenology 2020, 150, 339–346. [CrossRef]
47. Krachudel, J.; Bondzio, A.; Einspanier, R.; Einspanier, A.; Gottschalk, J.; Kuechenmeister, U.; Muennich, A. Theriogenology
Luteal Insuf Fi Ciency in Bitches as a Consequence of an Autoimmune Response against Progesterone? Theriogenology 2013, 79,
1278–1283. [CrossRef]
48. Kowalewski, M.P. Luteal Regression vs. Prepartum Luteolysis: Regulatory Mechanisms Governing Canine Corpus Luteum
Function. Reprod. Biol. 2014, 14, 89–102. [CrossRef]
49. Urhausen, C.; Wolf, K.; Einspanier, A.; Oei, C.; Piechotta, M. Serum Progesterone in Pregnant Bitches Supplemented with
Progestin Because of Expected or Suspected Luteal Insufficiency. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2012, 47, 55–60. [CrossRef]
50. Galac, S.; Kooistra, H.S.; Okkens, A.C.; Go, S. Hypoluteoidism in a Bitch. Theriogenology 2005, 64, 213–219. [CrossRef]
51. Zedda, M.T.; Bogliolo, L.; Antuofermo, E.; Falchi, L.; Ariu, F.; Burrai, G.P.; Pau, S. Hypoluteoidism in a Dog Associated with
Recurrent Mammary Fibroadenoma Stimulated by Progestin Therapy. Acta Vet. Scand. 2017, 59, 55. [CrossRef]
52. Kustritz, M.V.R. Pregnancy Diagnosis and Abnormalities of Pregnancy in the Dog. Theriogenology 2005, 64, 755–765. [CrossRef]
53. Graham, P.A.; Refsal, K.R.; Nachreiner, R.F. Etiopathologic Findings of Canine Hypothyroidism. Vet. Clin. North Am.-Small Anim.
Pract. 2007, 37, 617–631. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
54. Panciera, D.L.; Purswell, B.J.; Kolster, K.A. Effect of Short-Term Hypothyroidism on Reproduction in the Bitch. Theriogenology
2007, 68, 316–321. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
55. Panciera, D.L.; Purswell, B.J.; Kolster, K.A.; Werre, S.R.; Trout, S.W. Reproductive Effects of Prolonged Experimentally Induced
Hypothyroidism in Bitches. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2012, 26, 326–333. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
56. Cardinali, L.; Troisi, A.; Verstegen, J.P.; Menchetti, L.; Elad Ngonput, A.; Boiti, C.; Canello, S.; Zelli, R.; Polisca, A. Serum
Concentration Dynamic of Energy Homeostasis Hormones, Leptin, Insulin, Thyroid Hormones, and Cortisol throughout Canine
Pregnancy and Lactation. Theriogenology 2017, 97, 154–158. [CrossRef]
57. Cecere, J.; Purswell, B.; Panciera, D. Levothyroxine Supplementation in Hypothyroid Bitches during Pregnancy. Theriogenology
2020, 142, 48–53. [CrossRef]
58. Reimers, T.J.; Mummery, L.K.; McCann, J.P.; Cowan, R.G.; Concannon, P.W. Effects of Reproductive State on Concentrations of
Thyroxine, 3,5,3’-Triiodothyronine and Cortisol in Serum of Dogs. Biol. Reprod. 1984, 31, 148–154. [CrossRef]
59. Sullivan, S.A. Hypothyroidism in Pregnancy. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 62, 308–319. [CrossRef]
60. Steiner, M.; Mariani, C.; Suchodolski, J.S.; Guard, B.C.; Mila, H.; Steiner, J.M.; Mariani, C.; Suchodolski, J.S.; Chastant-Maillard,
S. Characterization of the Fecal Microbiome during Neonatal and Early Pediatric Development in Puppies. PLoS ONE 2017, 12,
e0175718.
61. Kajdič, L.; Plavec, T.; Zdovc, I.; Kalin, A.; Pipan, M.Z. Impact of Type of Parturition on Colostrum Microbiota Composition and
Puppy Survival. Animals 2021, 11, 1897. [CrossRef]
62. Melandri, M.; Aiudi, G.G.; Caira, M.; Alonge, S. A Biotic Support during Pregnancy to Strengthen the Gastrointestinal Performance
in Puppies. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 1–6. [CrossRef]
63. Zakošek Pipan, M.; Kajdič, L.; Kalin, A.; Plavec, T.; Zdovc, I. Do Newborn Puppies Have Their Own Microbiota at Birth? Influence
of Type of Birth on Newborn Puppy Microbiota. Theriogenology 2020, 152, 18–28. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
64. Tal, S.; Tikhonov, E.; Aroch, I.; Hefetz, L.; Turjeman, S.; Koren, O.; Kuzi, S. Developmental Intestinal Microbiome Alterations in
Canine Fading Puppy Syndrome: A Prospective Observational Study. Npj Biofilms Microb. 2021, 7, 52. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
65. Dzanis, D.A. The Association of American Feed Control Officials Dog and Cat Food Nutrient Profiles: Substantiation of Nutritional
Adequacy of Complete and Balanced Pet Foods in the United States. J. Nutr. 1994, 124, 2535–2539. [CrossRef]
66. Fontaine, E. Food Intake and Nutrition during Pregnancy, Lactation and Weaning in the Dam and Offspring. Reprod. Domest.
Anim. 2012, 47, 326–330. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
67. Gram, A.; Boos, A.; Kowalewski, M.P. Uterine and Placental Expression of Canine Oxytocin Receptor during Pregnancy and
Normal and Induced Parturition. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2014, 49, 41–49. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
68. Connolly, K.M.; Heinze, C.R.; Freeman, L.M. Feeding Practices of Dog Breeders in the United States and Canada. J. Am. Vet. Med.
Assoc. 2014, 245, 669–676. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
69. Kölle, P.; Schmidt, M. Raw-Meat-Based Diets (RMBD) as a Feeding Principle for Dogs. Tierarztl. Prax. Ausgabe K Kleintiere-Heimtiere
2015, 43, 409–419.
70. Schmitt, S.; Dobenecker, B. Calcium and Phosphorus Metabolism in Peripartal Dogs. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2020, 104,
707–714. [CrossRef]
71. Hollinshead, F.K.; Hanlon, D.W.; Gilbert, R.O.; Verstegen, J.P.; Krekeler, N.; Volkmann, D.H. Calcium, Parathyroid Hormone,
Oxytocin and PH Profiles in the Whelping Bitch. Theriogenology 2010, 73, 1276–1283. [CrossRef]
Animals 2022, 12, 1402 23 of 26
72. Spiegelstein, O.; Lu, X.; Le, X.C.; Troen, A.; Selhub, J.; Melnyk, S.; James, S.J.; Finnell, R.H. Effects of Dietary Folate Intake and
Folate Binding Protein-2 (Folbp2) on Urinary Speciation of Sodium Arsenate in Mice. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2005, 19, 1–7.
[CrossRef]
73. Kappen, C. Folate Supplementation in Three Genetic Models. Am. J. Med. Genet. C Semin. Med. Genet. 2005, 15, 24–30. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
74. Elwood, J.M.; Colquhoun, T.A. Observations on the Prevention of Cleft Palate in Dogs by Folic Acid and Potential Relevance to
Humans. N. Z. Vet. J. 1997, 45, 254–256. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
75. Malandain, E. Nutrition and Reroduction in Bitches and Queens. In Proceedings of the 5th Biannual Congress, European
Veterinary Society for Small Animal Reproduction (EVSSAR), Budapest, Hungary, 7–9 April 2006; pp. 180–224.
76. Domosławska, A.; Jurczak, A.; Janowski, T. Oral Folic Acid Supplementation Decreases Palate and/or Lip Cleft Occurrence in
Pug and Chihuahua Puppies and Elevates Folic Acid Blood Levels in Pregnant Bitches. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2013, 16, 33–37. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
77. Gonzales, K.L.; Famula, T.R.; Feng, L.C.; Power, H.M.N.; Bullis, J.M. Folic Acid Supplementation Does Not Decrease Stillbirths
and Congenital Malformations in a Guide Dog Colony. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2021, 62, 286–292. [CrossRef]
78. de Freitas, L.A.; Mota, G.L.; Silva, H.V.R.; Carvalho, C.F.; Silva, L.D.M. da Can Maternal-Fetal Hemodynamics Influence Prenatal
Development in Dogs? Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2016, 172, 83–93. [CrossRef]
79. Blanco, P.G.; Rodríguez, R.; Rube, A.; Arias, D.O.; Tórtora, M.; Díaz, J.D.; Gobello, C. Doppler Ultrasonographic Assessment of
Maternal and Fetal Blood Flow in Abnormal Canine Pregnancy. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2011, 126, 130–135. [CrossRef]
80. Blanco, P.G.; Huk, M.; Lapuente, C.; Tórtora, M.; Rodríguez, R.; Arias, D.O.; Gobello, C. Uterine and Umbilical Resistance Index
and Fetal Heart Rate in Pregnant Bitches of Different Body Weight. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2020, 212, 106225. [CrossRef]
81. Barella, G.; Faverzani, S.; Faustini, M.; Groppetti, D.; Pecile, A. Neonatal Mortality in Dogs: Prognostic Value of Doppler Ductus
Venosus Waveform Evaluation-Preliminary Results. Vet. World 2016, 9, 356–360. [CrossRef]
82. Van den Bossche, L.; van Steenbeek, F.G. Canine Congenital Portosystemic Shunts: Disconnections Dissected. Vet. J. 2016, 211,
14–20. [CrossRef]
83. Barstow, C.; Wilborn, R.R.; Johnson, A.K. Breeding Soundness Examination of the Bitch. Vet. Clin. N. Am.-Small Anim. Pract. 2018,
48, 547–566. [CrossRef]
84. Blanco, P.G.; Batista, P.R.; Re, N.E.; Mattioli, G.A.; Arias, D.O.; Gobello, C. Electrocardiographic Changes in Normal and Abnormal
Canine Pregnancy. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2012, 47, 252–256. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
85. Alonge, S.; Mauri, M.; Faustini, M.; Luvoni, G.C. Feto-Maternal Heart Rate Ratio in Pregnant Bitches: Effect of Gestational Age
and Maternal Size. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2016, 51, 688–692. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
86. Siena, G.; Milani, C. Usefulness of Maternal and Fetal Parameters for the Prediction of Parturition Date in Dogs. Animals 2021, 11,
878. [CrossRef]
87. Reynaud, K.; Fontbonne, A.; Saint-Dizier, M.; Thoumire, S.; Marnier, C.; Tahir, M.Z.; Meylheuc, T.; Chastant-Maillard, S.
Folliculogenesis, Ovulation and Endocrine Control of Oocytes and Embryos in the Dog. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2012, 47, 66–69.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
88. Kutzler, M.A.; Mohammed, H.O.; Lamb, S.V.; Meyers-Wallen, V.N. Accuracy of Canine Parturition Date Prediction from the
Initial Rise in Preovulatory Progesterone Concentration. Theriogenology 2003, 60, 1187–1196. [CrossRef]
89. Smith, F.O. Guide to Emergency Interception During Parturition in the Dog and Cat. Vet. Clin. North Am.-Small Anim. Pract. 2012,
42, 489–499. [CrossRef]
90. Veronesi, M.C. Assessment of Canine Neonatal Viability—The Apgar Score. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2016, 51, 46–50. [CrossRef]
91. De Cramer, K.G.M.; Nöthling, J.O. Curtailing Parturition Observation and Performing Preparturient Cesarean Section in Bitches.
Theriogenology 2019, 124, 57–64. [CrossRef]
92. Münnich, A.; Küchenmeister, U. Causes, Diagnosis and Therapy of Common Diseases in Neonatal Puppies in the First Days of
Life: Cornerstones of Practical Approach. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2014, 49, 64–74. [CrossRef]
93. Antończyk, A.; Ochota, M.; Niżański, W. Umbilical Cord Blood Gas Parameters and Apgar Scoring in Assessment of New-born
Dogs Delivered by Cesarean Section. Animals 2021, 11, 685. [CrossRef]
94. Veronesi, M.C.; Panzani, S.; Faustini, M.; Rota, A. An Apgar Scoring System for Routine Assessment of Newborn Puppy Viability
and Short-Term Survival Prognosis. Theriogenology 2009, 72, 401–407. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
95. Batista, M.; Moreno, C.; Vilar, J.; Golding, M.; Brito, C.; Santana, M.; Alamo, D. Neonatal Viability Evaluation by Apgar Score in
Puppies Delivered by Cesarean Section in Two Brachycephalic Breeds (English and French Bulldog). Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2014, 146,
218–226. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
96. Traas, A.M. Resuscitation of Canine and Feline Neonates. Theriogenology 2008, 70, 343–348. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
97. Groppetti, D.; Pecile, A.; Del Carro, A.P.; Copley, K.; Minero, M.; Cremonesi, F. Evaluation of Newborn Canine Viability by
Means of Umbilical Vein Lactate Measurement, Apgar Score and Uterine Tocodynamometry. Theriogenology 2010, 74, 1187–1196.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
98. Martínez-Burnes, J.; Muns, R.; Barrios-García, H.; Villanueva-García, D.; Domínguez-Oliva, A.; Mota-Rojas, D. Parturition in
Mammals: Animal Models, Pain and Distress. Animals 2021, 11, 2960. [CrossRef]
99. Lezama-García, K.; Mariti, C.; Mota-Rojas, D.; Martínez-Burnes, J.; Barrios-García, H.; Gazzano, A. Maternal Behaviour in
Domestic Dogs. Int. J. Vet. Sci. Med. 2019, 7, 20–30. [CrossRef]
Animals 2022, 12, 1402 24 of 26
100. Mathews, K.A. Analgesia for the Pregnant, Lactating and Neonatal to Pediatric Cat and Dog. J. Vet. Emerg. Crit. Care 2005, 15,
273–284. [CrossRef]
101. Ferrari, D.; Lundgren, S.; Holmberg, J.; Edner, A.; Ekstrand, C.; Nyman, G.; Bondesson, U.; Hagman, R. Concentration of
Carprofen in the Milk of Lactating Bitches after Cesarean Section and during Inflammatory Conditions. Theriogenology 2022, 181,
59–68. [CrossRef]
102. Schneider, M.; Kuchta, A.; Dron, F.; Woehrlé, F. Disposition of Cimicoxib in Plasma and Milk of Whelping Bitches and in Their
Puppies. BMC Vet. Res. 2015, 11, 4–9. [CrossRef]
103. Kusse, G.; Birhanu, M.; Ayele, T. Review on Dog Neonatal Mortality. Adv. Life Sci. Technol. 2018, 65, 19–26.
104. Nobre Pacifico Pereira, K.H.; Cruz dos Santos Correia, L.E.; Ritir Oliveira, E.L.; Bernardo, R.B.; Nagib Jorge, M.L.; Mezzena
Gobato, M.L.; Ferreira de Souza, F.; Rocha, N.S.; Chiacchio, S.B.; Gomes Lourenço, M.L. Incidence of Congenital Malformations
and Impact on the Mortality of Neonatal Canines. Theriogenology 2019, 140, 52–57. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
105. Kim, M.J.; Oh, H.J.; Kim, G.A.; Jo, Y.K.; Choi, J.; Kim, H.J.; Choi, H.Y.; Kim, H.W.; Choi, M.C.; Lee, B.C. Reduced Birth Weight,
Cleft Palate and Preputial Abnormalities in a Cloned Dog. Acta Vet. Scand. 2014, 56, 18. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
106. Davidson, A.P.; Gregory, C.; Dedrick, P. Successful Management Permitting Delayed Operative Revision of Cleft Palate in a
Labrador Retriever. Vet. Clin. North Am.-Small Anim. Pract. 2014, 44, 325–329. [CrossRef]
107. Mahler, S.; Williams, G. Preservation of the Fistula for Reconstruction of the Anal Canal and the Anus in Atresia Ani and
Rectovestibular Fistula in 2 Dogs. Vet. Surg. 2005, 34, 148–152. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
108. Fiani, N.; Verstraete, F.J.M.; Arzi, B. Reconstruction of Congenital Nose, Cleft Primary Palate, and Lip Disorders. Vet. Clin. North
Am.-Small Anim. Pract. 2016, 46, 663–675. [CrossRef]
109. Ellison, G.W.; Papazoglou, L.G. Long-Term Results of Surgery for Atresia Ani with or without Anogenital Malformations in
Puppies and a Kitten: 12 Cases (1983-2010). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2012, 240, 186–192. [CrossRef]
110. Mila, H.; Grellet, A.; Feugier, A.; Chastant-Maillard, S. Differential Impact of Birth Weight and Early Growth on Neonatal
Mortality in Puppies. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 93, 4436–4442. [CrossRef]
111. Ki, O.; So, O.; Mma, D.; Mh, A.; Eo, A.; Jg, G. A Review of Neonatal Mortality in Dogs. Int. J. Life Sci. 2016, 4, 451–460.
112. Mugnier, A.; Mila, H.; Guiraud, F.; Brévaux, J.; Lecarpentier, M.; Martinez, C.; Mariani, C.; Adib-Lesaux, A.; Chastant-Maillard, S.;
Saegerman, C.; et al. Birth Weight as a Risk Factor for Neonatal Mortality: Breed-Specific Approach to Identify at-Risk Puppies.
Prev. Vet. Med. 2019, 171, 104746. [CrossRef]
113. Tesi, M.; Miragliotta, V.; Scala, L.; Aronica, E.; Lazzarini, G.; Fanelli, D.; Abramo, F.; Rota, A. Relationship between Placental
Characteristics and Puppies’ Birth Weight in Toy and Small Sized Dog Breeds. Theriogenology 2020, 141, 1–8. [CrossRef]
114. Groppetti, D.; Pecile, A.; Palestrini, C.; Marelli, S.P.; Boracchi, P. A National Census of Birthweight in Purebred Dogs in Italy.
Animals 2017, 7, 43. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
115. Mugnier, A.; Chastant-Maillard, S.; Mila, H.; Lyazrhi, F.; Guiraud, F.; Adib-Lesaux, A.; Gaillard, V.; Saegerman, C.; Grellet, A. Low
and Very Low Birth Weight in Puppies: Definitions, Risk Factors and Survival in a Large-Scale Population. BMC Vet. Res. 2020,
16, 354. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
116. Reyes-Sotelo, B.; Mota-Rojas, D.; Mora-Medina, P.; Ogi, A.; Mariti, C.; Olmos-Hernández, A.; Martínez-Burnes, J.; Hernández-
ávalos, I.; Sánchez-Millán, J.; Gazzano, A. Blood Biomarker Profile Alterations in Newborn Canines: Effect of the Mother0 s Weight.
Animals 2021, 11, 2307. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
117. Sanin, L.H.; López, S.R.; Olivares, E.T.; Terrazas, M.C.; Silva, M.A.R.; Carrillo, M.L. Relation between Birth Weight and Placenta
Weight. Biol. Neonate 2001, 80, 113–117. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
118. Dombrowski, M.P.; Berry, S.M.; Johnson, M.P.; Saleh, A.A.A.; Sokol, R.J. Birth Weight–Length Ratios, Ponderal Indexes, Placental
Weights, and Birth Weight–Placenta Ratios in a Large Population. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 1994, 148, 508–512. [CrossRef]
119. Katheria, A.C.; Lakshminrusimha, S.; Rabe, H.; McAdams, R.; Mercer, J.S. Placental Transfusion: A Review. J. Perinatol. 2017, 37,
105–111. [CrossRef]
120. Elliott, C.; Morton, J.; Chopin, J. Factors Affecting Foal Birth Weight in Thoroughbred Horses. Theriogenology 2009, 71, 683–689.
[CrossRef]
121. Dwyer, C.M.; Calvert, S.K.; Farish, M.; Donbavand, J.; Pickup, H.E. Breed, Litter and Parity Effects on Placental Weight and
Placentome Number, and Consequences for the Neonatal Behaviour of the Lamb. Theriogenology 2005, 63, 1092–1110. [CrossRef]
122. Sarli, G.; Castagnetti, C.; Bianco, C.; Ballotta, G.; Tura, G.; Caporaletti, M.; Cunto, M.; Avallone, G.; Benazzi, C.; Ostanello, F.;
et al. Canine Placenta Histological Findings and Microvascular Density: The Histological Basis of a Negative Neonatal Outcome?
Animals 2021, 11, 1418. [CrossRef]
123. Lawler, D.F. Neonatal and Pediatric Care of the Puppy and Kitten. Theriogenology 2008, 70, 384–392. [CrossRef]
124. Reyes-Sotelo, B.; Mota-Rojas, D.; Martínez-Burnes, J.; Olmos-Hernández, A.; Hernández-Ávalos, I.; José, N.; Casas-Alvarado, A.;
Gómez, J.; Mora-Medina, P. Thermal Homeostasis in the Newborn Puppy: Behavioral and Physiological Responses. J. Anim.
Behav. Biometeorol. 2021, 9, 1–25. [CrossRef]
125. Von Dehn, B. Pediatric Clinical Pathology. Vet. Clin. North Am.-Small Anim. Pract. 2014, 44, 205–219. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
126. Fitzgerald, K.T.; Newquist, K.L. Husbandry of the Neonate. In Small Animal Pediatrics; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
2011; pp. 44–52. ISBN 9781416048893.
Animals 2022, 12, 1402 25 of 26
127. Mila, H.; Feugier, A.; Grellet, A.; Anne, J.; Gonnier, M.; Martin, M.; Rossig, L.; Chastant-Maillard, S. Inadequate Passive Immune
Transfer in Puppies: Definition, Risk Factors and Prevention in a Large Multi-Breed Kennel. Prev. Vet. Med. 2014, 116, 209–213.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
128. Mila, H.; Grellet, A.; Mariani, C.; Feugier, A.; Guard, B.; Suchodolski, J.; Steiner, J.; Chastant-Maillard, S. Natural and Artificial
Hyperimmune Solutions: Impact on Health in Puppies. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2017, 52, 163–169. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
129. Rossi, L.; Lumbreras, A.E.V.; Vagni, S.; Dell’Anno, M.; Bontempo, V. Nutritional and Functional Properties of Colostrum in
Puppies and Kittens. Animals 2021, 11, 3260. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
130. Chastant-Maillard, S.; Aggouni, C.; Albaret, A.; Fournier, A.; Mila, H. Canine and Feline Colostrum. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2017,
52, 148–152. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
131. Chastant, S.; Mila, H. Passive Immune Transfer in Puppies. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2019, 207, 162–170. [CrossRef]
132. Kaszak, I.; Ruszczak, A.; Kanafa, S.; Piłaszewicz, O.W.; Sacharczuk, M.; Jurka, P. New Insights of Canine Mastitis—A Review.
Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 2018, 36, 33–44.
133. Guardini, G.; Bowen, J.; Raviglione, S.; Farina, R.; Gazzano, A. Maternal Behaviour in Domestic Dogs: A Comparison between
Primiparous and Multiparous Dogs. Dog Behav. 2015, 1, 23–33. [CrossRef]
134. Santos, N.R.; Beck, A.; Fontbonne, A. A Review of Maternal Behaviour in Dogs and Potential Areas for Further Research. J. Small
Anim. Pract. 2020, 61, 85–92. [CrossRef]
135. Meloni, T.; Martino, P.A.; Grieco, V.; Pisu, M.C.; Banco, B.; Rota, A.; Veronesi, M.C. Studio Del Ruolo Delle Infezioni Batteriche
Nella Mortalità Neonatale Dei Cani. Vet. Ital. 2014, 50, 293–299. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
136. Corrò, M.; Skarin, J.; Börjesson, S.; Rota, A. Occurrence and Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Pseudinter-
medius in Successive Parturitions of Bitches and Their Puppies in Two Kennels in Italy. BMC Vet. Res. 2018, 14, 308. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
137. Guerrero, A.E.; Stornelli, M.C.; Jurado, S.B.; Giacoboni, G.; Sguazza, G.H.; de la Sota, R.L.; Stornelli, M.A. Vaginal Isolation of
Beta-Haemolytic Streptococcus from Bitches with and without Neonatal Deaths in the Litters. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2018, 53,
609–616. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
138. Fernández, A.G.; Hielpos, M.S.; Ferrero, M.C.; Fossati, C.A.; Baldi, P.C. Proinflammatory Response of Canine Trophoblasts to
Brucella Canis Infection. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0186561. [CrossRef]
139. Goericke-Pesch, S.; Fux, V.; Prenger-Berninghoff, E.; Wehrend, A. Bacteriological Findings in the Canine Uterus during Caesarean
Section Performed Due to Dystocia and Their Correlation to Puppy Mortality at the Time of Parturition. Reprod. Domest. Anim.
2018, 53, 889–894. [CrossRef]
140. Montgomery, M.P.; Robertson, S.; Koski, L.; Salehi, E.; Stevenson, L.M.; Silver, R.; Sundararaman, P.; Singh, A.; Joseph, L.A.;
Weisner, M.B.; et al. Multidrug-Resistant Campylobacter Jejuni Outbreak Linked to Puppy Exposure—United States, 2016–2018.
MMWR. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2018, 67, 1032–1035. [CrossRef]
141. Lashnits, E.; Grant, S.; Thomas, B.; Qurollo, B.; Breitschwerdt, E.B. Evidence for Vertical Transmission of Mycoplasma Haemocanis,
but Not Ehrlichia Ewingii, in a Dog. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2019, 33, 1747–1752. [CrossRef]
142. Santos, R.L.; Souza, T.D.; Mol, J.P.S.; Eckstein, C.; Paíxão, T.A. Canine Brucellosis: An Update. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 1–17.
[CrossRef]
143. Latrofa, M.S.; Dantas-Torres, F.; De Caprariis, D.; Cantacessi, C.; Capelli, G.; Lia, R.P.; Breitschwerdt, E.B.; Otranto, D. Vertical
Transmission of Anaplasma Platys and Leishmania Infantum in Dogs during the First Half of Gestation. Parasites Vectors 2016, 9,
269. [CrossRef]
144. Matei, I.A.; Stuen, S.; Modrý, D.; Degan, A.; D’Amico, G.; Mihalca, A.D. Neonatal Anaplasma Platys Infection in Puppies: Further
Evidence for Possible Vertical Transmission. Vet. J. 2017, 219, 40–41. [CrossRef]
145. Decaro, N.; Carmichael, L.E.; Buonavoglia, C. Viral Reproductive Pathogens of Dogs and Cats. Vet. Clin. N. Am.-Small Anim.
Pract. 2012, 42, 583–598. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
146. Ström Holst, B.; Hagberg Gustavsson, M.; Grapperon-Mathis, M.; Lilliehöök, I.; Johannisson, A.; Isaksson, M.; Lindhe, A.; Axnér,
E. Canine Herpesvirus During Pregnancy and Non-Pregnant Luteal Phase. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2012, 47, 362–365. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
147. Mila, H.; Grellet, A.; Feugier, A.; Desario, C.; Decaro, N.; Buonavoglia, C.; Mariani, C.; Chastant-Maillard, S. General and Type 2
Parvovirus-Specific Passive Immune Transfer in Puppies-Evaluation by Early Growth. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2018, 53, 96–102.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
148. Muñoz, A.I.; Vallejo-Castillo, L.; Fragozo, A.; Vázquez-Leyva, S.; Pavón, L.; Pérez-Sánchez, G.; Soria-Castro, R.; Mellado-
Sánchez, G.; Cobos-Marin, L.; Pérez-Tapia, S.M. Increased Survival in Puppies Affected by Canine Parvovirus Type II Using an
Immunomodulator as a Therapeutic Aid. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 19864. [CrossRef]
149. Decaro, N.; Buonavoglia, C.; Barrs, V.R. Canine Parvovirus Vaccination and Immunisation Failures: Are We Far from Disease
Eradication? Vet. Microbiol. 2020, 247, 108760. [CrossRef]
150. Calero-Berna, R.; Gennari, S.M. Clinical Toxoplasmosis in Dogs and Cats: An Update. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019, 6, 54. [CrossRef]
151. Dubey, J.P.; Murata, F.H.A.; Cerqueira-Cézar, C.K.; Kwok, O.C.H.; Yang, Y.; Su, C. Toxoplasma Gondii Infections in Dogs:
2009-2020. Vet. Parasitol. 2020, 287, 2009–2020. [CrossRef]
Animals 2022, 12, 1402 26 of 26
152. Headley, S.A.; Alfieri, A.A.; Fritzen, J.T.T.; Garcia, J.L.; Weissenböck, H.; da Silva, A.P.; Bodnar, L.; Okano, W.; Alfieri, A.F.
Concomitant Canine Distemper, Infectious Canine Hepatitis, Canine Parvoviral Enteritis, Canine Infectious Tracheobronchitis,
and Toxoplasmosis in a Puppy. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2013, 25, 129–135. [CrossRef]
153. Anvari, D.; Saberi, R.; Sharif, M.; Sarvi, S.; Hosseini, S.A.; Moosazadeh, M.; Hosseininejad, Z.; Chegeni, T.N.; Daryani, A.
Seroprevalence of Neospora Caninum Infection in Dog Population Worldwide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Acta
Parasitol. 2020, 65, 273–290. [CrossRef]
154. Robbe, D.; Passarelli, A.; Gloria, A.; Di Cesare, A.; Capelli, G.; Iorio, R.; Traversa, D. Neospora Caninum Seropositivity and
Reproductive Risk Factors in Dogs. Exp. Parasitol. 2016, 164, 31–35. [CrossRef]
155. McAllister, M.M.; Funnell, O.; Donahoe, S.L.; Šlapeta, J. Unusual Presentation of Neosporosis in a Neonatal Puppy from a Litter
of Bulldogs. Aust. Vet. J. 2016, 94, 411–414. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
156. Gharekhani, J.; Yakhchali, M.; Berahmat, R. Neospora Caninum Infection in Iran (2004–2020): A Review. J. Parasit. Dis. 2020, 44,
671–686. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
157. Cerqueira-Cézar, C.K.; Calero-Bernal, R.; Dubey, J.P.; Gennari, S.M. All about Neosporosis in Brazil Tudo Sobre Neosporose No
Brasil. Electron. Braz. J. Vet. Parasitol. 2017, 26, 253–279. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
158. Sloan, S.; Šlapeta, J.; Jabbar, A.; Hunnam, J.; De Groef, B.; Rawlin, G.; McCowan, C. High Seroprevalance of Neospora Caninum in
Dogs in Victoria, Australia, Compared to 20 Years Ago. Parasites Vectors 2017, 10, 503. [CrossRef]
159. van Bree, F.P.J.; Bokken, G.C.A.M.; Mineur, R.; Franssen, F.; Opsteegh, M.; van der Giessen, J.W.B.; Lipman, L.J.A.; Overgaauw,
P.A.M. Zoonotic Bacteria and Parasites Found in Raw Meat-Based Diets for Cats and Dogs. Vet. Rec. 2018, 182, 50. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
160. Ahmed, F.; Cappai, M.G.; Morrone, S.; Cavallo, L.; Berlinguer, F.; Dessì, G.; Tamponi, C.; Scala, A.; Varcasia, A. Raw Meat Based
Diet (RMBD) for Household Pets as Potential Door Opener to Parasitic Load of Domestic and Urban Environment. Revival of
Understated Zoonotic Hazards? A Review. One Health 2021, 13, 100327. [CrossRef]
161. Broeckx, B.J.G. The Dog 2.0: Lessons Learned from the Past. Theriogenology 2020, 150, 20–26. [CrossRef]