Compassion Fatigue of Addiction Counselor
Compassion Fatigue of Addiction Counselor
Compassion Fatigue of Addiction Counselor
Abstract
Talking about addiction rehabilitation, addiction counselor became one of the most important
roles. Addiction counselors work full time and have big responsibility. The burden and
responsibility they got, might lead them to experience a fatigue which is called compassion
fatigue. It is exactly dangerous to the performance, personal life, and psychological well
well-being of
the counselors. This research used qualitative research method with thematic analysis approach
that aimed to get the description of compassion fatigue of the addiction counselors. The
participants of this research were 4 addiction counselors in Jambi. The data collection technique
used in this research was in in-depth
depth interview. In thematic analysis, the process of coding could
produce theme lists and then those themes can be identified at the manifest level. The results
showed that there were three components described in ccompassion ompassion fatigue of addiction
counselor: symptom, risk factors, and protective factors. The addiction counselor showed some
compassion fatigue in order of cognitive, emotional, and behavior domain. Being apathy, as in
cognitive domain, was the strongest ssymptom
ymptom among the others. Addictive counselor were at
risk to suffer from compassion fatigue due to their experience worked as counselor, their
experience as an addict—sincesince mostly addictive counselor was an addict once
once—work stress,
maladaptive coping strategies,
egies, unhealthy relationship, and their personal problem. Despite of
the risks they face, the addictive counselors could still manage them and perform well with
regard to the protective factors: adaptive coping strategies, selfself-development
development activity, work-
work
environment, support system, and optimism.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons 4.0 Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use
use, distribution,
and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
cited. ©2018 by author and Faculty of education, Universitas Negeri
Padang.
Introduction
Substance abuse is a critical problem in Indonesia across all segments of the population and
impacts in some way all members of our society. Based on United Nations World Agency’s Report on
Drug and Crime (UNODC) in 2012, it is estimated that 149 to 272 mimillion
llion people consumed drugs in
2009, with the age group 15-64
64 years old. While in Indonesia, in 2004 the prevalence of drug abusers
was 1,5 % and in 2008 it was 1,99% or around 3,2
3,2-3,6
3,6 million people, consisting of 26% tried to use,
27% regularly used, and 47% addicts (National Survey of BNN and Pultikes UI, 2008). The significant
number of the Indonesian population having substance abuse problems wass indicated by
approximately 19,34 % abusing illegal drugs, 7,3% having problems with drinking, 4,25% being
addicted to nicotine and, conservatively, 5% addicted to prescription medications (BNN and Pultikes
UI, 2017).
Substance abuse is defined as the categories classified in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV
(DSM-IV) (American Psychiatric Association, 1994) as Substance-Related Disorders and Substance-
Induced Disorders. These disorders include the active use and/or dependency on any mood-altering
substance. Substances include alcohol, sedatives, amphetamines, cannabis, cocaine, hallucinogens,
inhalants, opioid, caffeine, nicotine, and prescription drugs, as well as legal drugs. Addictive behavior
is characterized by preoccupation with the substance or the experience, withdrawal symptoms after
not engaging in the substance or experience, increased tolerance for the substance or activity in order
to achieve the same effect, and continued use despite negative consequences. An individual with a
substance abuse problem is unique in his/her history, pattern of use and abuse, and counseling and
related treatment needs.
While many models of causation of substance abuse have been proposed, no clear etiology has
been identified. Models emphasize morality or individual conscious choice, biological or disease
vulnerability, behavioral learning patterns, cultural–environmental concerns, or biopsychosocial
impact. The biopsychosocial model views substance abuse as a complex interaction of all of the other
models and endorses multiple strategies for counseling from these models as appropriate. Counselors
need to review these models to develop a conceptual position regarding causation upon which he/she
can make consistent therapeutic assumptions and decisions to guide counseling practice.
Addiction counselors in Indonesia in general are former drug abusers who have successfully
passing through rehab and participate in an addiction training to become a counselor. There is also
No. history of drug abuse, but there has been special training to become an addiction counselor. The
one of institution X in Jambi has five counselors in which four former drugs users. Since 2016 until
August 2018, the Rehabilitation Institute X in Jambi has handled many clients, both who attended
inpatient and outpatient programs. The following are data of clients who have participated are:
Table. 1
Client Data in Rehabilitation Institute X Jambi
2016 21 7 28
All counselors no matter what their specialty or setting will encounter clients with presenting or
related problems of substance abuse. Addiction is severe and chronic, the disorder requires treatment.
That treatment is supplied by addiction professionals who are specifically trained to treat addiction.
Many times, these professionals have not received any specific training geared toward treating the co-
occurrence of addiction and other mental conditions such as trauma (Bride, Hatcher, & Humble,
2009). Not having specific training regarding how to treat addiction and trauma is an issue because
addiction professionals may not be prepared for the possible negative reactions they may experience
due to dealing with the traumatic stress of their clients (Knight, 2010).
Addictions counselors work under difficult conditions: funding cuts, restrictions on the delivery of
services, changing certification and licensure standards, mandated clients, and clients that need
special care (Osborn, 2004). In addition, other situational factors such as low salaries, staff turnover,
agency upheaval, and limited opportunities for career development create additional burdens
(Ogborne, Braun, & Schmidt, 1998); not to mention the well-known difficulty of working with clients
who have high relapse rates (Festinger, Rubenstein, Marlowe, & Platt, 2001) and high rates of
psychiatric comorbidity (McGovern, Xie, Segal, Siembab, & Drake, 2006).Under those circumstances,
burnout has been reported as a prevalent problem among addiction counselors and other providers
of mental health care (Balogun, Titiloye, Balogun, Oyeyemi, & Katz, 2002; Osborn, 2004), especially
among those rendering direct services to their recipients (Peterson, 1990).
Compassion fatigue is defined as a combination of physical, emotional and spiritual depletion
related to caring for clients with emotionally suffering conditions and experiencing significant
physical stress (Lombardo & Eyre, 2011). Compassion fatigue is an emotional residue exposed from
work to face the suffering of others, especially individuals who suffer from traumatic events.
Compassion fatigue is an emotional residue exposed from work to face the suffering of others,
especially individuals who suffer from traumatic events. Professional who listens to other people’s
stories of fear, pain and suffering from others will also feel fear and the same pain because they care.
Professional are very vulnerable to Compassion Fatigue, including emergency workers, counselors,
mental health and medical professionals, pastors, advocates, and human service workers. If an
individual experiences as if losing his sense of self, he might be experience compassion fatigue
(Thompson, et al, 2014).
The impacts of Compassion Fatigue in someone is characterized by a decrease in performance,
error in work and even affect personal life. Compassion fatigue can also have an impact on a person’s
health loss. A special profession such as a counselor may experience compassion fatigue because he
works with clients who suffer and do it every day (Cummins, et al, 2007). This process requires the
counselor to consistently gather energy to engage with the emotions of others. The symptoms are
avoiding clients, reducing the ability to feel empathy for clients, increased absent in the office, and
overall fear of work (Lombardo & Eyre, 2011). The impact might arise if there is a compassion fatigue
can disrupts the performance of the counselor and their personal life. Considering that most of
addiction counselors are former abusers, it is not impossible that compassion fatigue can also lead
them to relapse and using drugs again.
Based on the explanation above, it is interesting to examine further and in depth description about
compassion fatigue among addiction counselors. It is necessary to extract in-depth data about the
perceptions and the emotions among addiction counselor when carrying out their roles. Based on
these, it interesting to explain the dynamics of the compassion fatigue experienced by addiction
counselors X rehabilitation in Jambi. It also to know the strategy for countering compassion fatigue
carried out by addiction counselor in Jambi.
Method
This study used qualitative methods that aim to understand a phenomenon in a social context
naturally to obtain a deeper description and information about compassion fatigue among addiction
counselors. Qualitative research also aimed to provide an implicit explanation of the structure, order
and the patterns found in a group of participants. The method used in this study is a thematic
approach. According to Boyatzis (Braun & Clarke, 2006) a thematic approach is a method for
identifying, analyzing and reporting on themes contained in a phenomenon.
Respondent in this research were selected by purposive sampling technique. In this descriptive
qualitative research, four experienced addiction counselors who work with people with drug addicts
and trauma were interviewed about their experiences. This research was conducted in Rehabilitation
Institute X Jambi. The rehabilitation institution is a private that provides inpatient and outpatient
services to various drug abuse cases in Jambi. Respondents in the study disclosed extremely sensitive
information about their personal and professional attributes. Therefore, confidentiality of respondents
was of the most importance to the researchers. To protect the confidentiality of the respondents,
further identifying information about the respondent could not be provided. As for the criteria of
respondents, were: (1) Addiction counselor at the Rehabilitation Institute X in Jambi; (2) Having a full
experience of handling clients; (3) Willing to be an informant.
To obtain data that accordance with the research objectives, data collection techniques used in
depth interview methods. Through in-depth interviews, the researchers could explore counselors’
personal and emotional experience in handling drug addicts, even their own personal traumatic
experience.
The stages of analysis data of this research were : (a) Transcribing data; (b) Generating initial
codes; (c) Searching for themes; (d) Reviewing themes; (e) Defining and naming themes; (f) Producing
the report. (Braun & Clarke, 2006).
The counselors who were an addict, had to attend several programs before becoming an addiction
counselor. They had to do a rehab until they had a sober clearance, then attend on-the-job training as
a counselor in one of the rehab center with specific program. After that, they had to be a volunteer in
rehab center and worked under supervision. P.S had different path to be an addictive counselor. She
studied psychology and worked in BNN. Still, she had to do some training about addiction from
BNN or Social Ministry.
After some interview sessions with all of the participants, each interview transcripts was coded in
some steps. These are the summary of the coded data:
Table 3.
Early step of thematic analysis
Participants
Domain Themes Subthemes
P.F P.W P.H P.S
1. Apathy √ √ √
2. Low self esteem √ √ √
SYMPTOM A. Cognitive
3. Lack of concentration √ √
4. Negativistic √ √
1. Anger √ √ √ √
2. Emotional rapid changing √ √ √
3. Feeling guilty √ √
B. Emotional
4. Helplessness √ √
5. Feeling depressed √
6. Emotional Depletion √
1. Blaming self or the Client √ √ √
2. Difficulty in separating personal problems √ √ √ √
3. Alert √ √ √
C. Behavior 4. Impatience √ √ √
5. Oversensitive √ √
6. Careless √
7. Demotivation √
A. Experience 1. Handling traumatic client √ √ √
with client 2. Interaction with the client’s family √ √
1. Experience as an addict √ √
B. Personal 2. Relapse experience √ √
Experience 3. Traumatic experience √ √ √
4. Not Supportive family √
1. Heavy Workload √ √ √ √
RISK C. Stressful 2. Inappropriate salary √ √ √
FACTOR Work System 3. Unsupportive office system √ √
4. Lack of competence √ √
D. Maladaptive 1. Ignoring the problem √ √
Coping √
2. Do Nothing
Strategies
1. Incompatibility √
E. Negative
2. Bad influence from colleagues √
relationship
3. Problems with colleagues √ √
a. Regulating emotion √
1. Emotional b. Positive Reappraisal √ √ √
Focused c. Personal activity √ √
A. Adaptive d. Seeking family support √
Coping a. Understand the problem √ √ √
2. Problem
Strategies objectively
Focused
b. Make a plan √
a. Gratitude √ √
3. Spiritual
b. Learn about religion √
PROTECTIVE B. Self- 1. Training √ √ √ √
FACTOR Development 2. Autodidact learning √
1. Supportive work system √ √
C. Work
2. Constructive supervision √ √ √ √
environment
3. Reward system √
D. Social 1. Family support √ √ √
Support 2. Friend support √ √ √
1. Having hope √ √ √ √
E. Optimism
2. Satisfaction in helping client √
F. Self- √
Awareness of self-limitation
Awareness
This research explored three domains in compassion fatigue: symptom, risk factor, and protective
factor. All participants had been exposed to compassion fatigue while handling the clients. They had
different symptom in all area, dominantly in behavioral symptom. P.S had almost all of the symptom
except feeling depressed and demotivation, while P.W had the least symptom and most of it were
emotional symptoms. P.W was the only participant that had not handled traumatic client yet.
Compassion fatigue is specifically defined as a state of tension, stress, and preoccupation felt by
counselor in helping traumatized client by re-experiencing the traumatic events of the client (Figley,
2002). According to that statement, it was not accurate to say that P.W exposed to compassion fatigue.
He indeed had similar symptom to compassion fatigue, but it could be any other condition except
compassion fatigue.
Compassion fatigue has similar construct with concept of burn out. Burnout is defined as, “a
psychological syndrome that develops in response to chronic emotional and interpersonal stress”
(DePippo, 2015). The most important difference between compassion fatigue and burnout was
whether the counselor exposed to traumatized client or not. Burnout is a state of emotional and
physical exhaustion caused by excessive and prolonged stress (Circenisa & Millere, 2011). So, P.W
might suffer more from burnout than compassion fatigue.
Some addiction counselors were an addict before, just like those participants. This became a
unique challenge to them since they similar experience to their client. On the other hand, it made
them vulnerable to run into compassion fatigue, because of the traumatic event as an addict. It was
like the client’s traumatic experience channeling to the counselor’s personal traumatic experience. So,
not only traumatized client, but also counselors’ personal traumatic event could be the risk factor to
compassion fatigue (DePippo, 2015).
According to the participants, they still counseled their client despite of all the symptoms.
Sometimes they could build a good relationship and fully help the client, and other time they did not.
CF symptom shown by the participant were influenced by the risk factors. Risk factor is anything--
including emotional conditions--that are the trigger of negative behavior or activity (DePippo, 2015) .
According to the participants, they still counseled their client despite of all the CF symptoms.
Sometimes they could build a good relationship and fully help the client, and other time they did not.
When they succeed in conquering the CF symptoms, protective factors made them be able to manage
it. Protective Factor is a characteristic found in individuals and also outside itself and capable to
reducing or fighting the behavior problem (DePippo, 2015).
In the early thematic analysis, there were five risk factors of compassion fatigue to the addiction
counselor: (1) experience with the client, specially traumatized client, (2) personal experience,
including traumatic experiences, (3) stressful work system, (4) maladaptive coping strategies, (5)
negative relationship. Stressful work system and negative relationship were things that could lead the
counselor into burnout, so those factors included as burnout. In the final analysis, CF risk factors were
divided into four categories: (1) experience with the client, (2) personal experience, (3) maladaptive
coping strategies, and (4) burnout.
In the beginning, there were six protective factors: (1) adaptive coping strategies, (2) self-
development, (3) work environment, (4) social support, (5) optimism, and (6) self-awareness. Positive
work environment and social support, in the contrary to risk factor, could lead the counselors to have
more healthy conditions. So, in the final analysis, there were only four protective factors: (1) adaptive
coping strategies, (2) self-development, (3) optimism, and (4) self-awareness. Coping played an
important role that could lead the counselor into compassion fatigue or not. Adaptive coping would
make the counselor be able to handle their emotional and personal distress so they still could perform
in their high functioning work. In the contrary, maladaptive coping strategies would make the
counselor stay in the bad situation that lead to compassion fatigue.
To make it clear,
ear, the cycle of compassion fatigue is explained in Figure.1
Figure 1. Risk factor and Protective factor of compassion fatigue adapted from Middleton and developed based on research
result (Cocker, 2016)
When the counselor handling traumatized client, it might lead them to compassion fatigue if they
had personal traumatic experience, burnout, and could not perform any adaptive coping strategies.
But, if they had protective factors more than risk factors and they can perform adaptive coping, they
might not ot have compassion fatigue. This research explored the experiences of four addictive
counselors in on rehabilitation center. The concept above need to be proved in bigger subject so it can
be generalized in bigger population. Comparing counselor with and w without
ithout addiction experience
would be one of the topics for further research.
Conclusions
Compassion fatigue could be face by any addictive counselor. The symptoms would be shown in
cognitive, emotional, and behavioral domain. Every counselor would show di different symptoms.
Addictive counselors suffered from compassion fatigue due to the combination of risk factors and
protective factors. The risk factors were: 1) experience with the client, (2) personal experience, (3)
maladaptive coping strategies, and (4) burn out. The protective factors were: 1) adaptive coping
strategies, (2) self-development,
development, (3) optimism, and (4) self
self-awareness.
awareness. The result of this research need
to be presented to stakeholders of Rehabilitation Institute X in Jambi so they could make a policy to
reduce the compassion fatigue among the addictive counselor in there.
Acknowledgments
This research would not have been possible without the financial support of Faculty Medicine and
Health Science, University of Jambi. We were grateful to all ooff those with whom we have had the
pleasure to work during this and other related projects. Each of members of our research assistance
has provided us extensive personal and work professional. We would especially like to thank our
participants, also the chairman
irman of Rehabilitation Institute X in Jambi, for the kindness and
cooperation.
References
Balogun, J.A. Titiloye, V, Balogun, A. Oyeyemi, A. & Katz, J. (2002). Prevalence and Determinants of
Burnout Among Physical and Ocuupational Therapist. Journal of Allied Health (31), 131-139
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Clark, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in Psychology. Qualitative
Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bride, B. E., Hatcher, S. S., & Humble, M. N. (2009). Trauma training, trauma practices, and secondary
traumatic stress among substance abuse counselors. Traumatology, 15(2), 96–105.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1534765609336362
BNN & Pusat Penelitian Kesehatan Universitas Indonesia. 2017. Laporan Survei Penyalahgunaan
Narkoba di Indonesia. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia
Cocker, F., & Joss, N. (2016). Compassion fatigue among healthcare, emergency and community
service workers: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public
Health, 13(6), 1–18. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13060618
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Penelitian kualitatif dan desain riset (A. Lazuardi, Trans.), Yogykakarta:
Pustaka pelajar. (Naskah asli diterbitkan tahun 2013)
Cummins, P. N., Massey, L., & Jones , A. (2007). Keeping ourselves well: Strategies for promoting and
maintaining counselor wellness. The Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education and Development
(46), 35-49. Doi: 10.1002/j.2161-1939.2007.tb00024.x
DePippo, A. G. (2015). Compassion Fatigue and Self-Care Strategies among Addiction Professionals:
A Qualitative Study. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, (January), 170. Retrieved from
http://ezproxy.lib.ryerson.ca/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1696782198?account
id=13631%5Cnhttp://sfx.scholarsportal.info/ryerson??url_ver=Z39.88-
2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&genre=dissertations+&+theses&sid=ProQ:Pr
oQue
Festinger, D.S. Rubenstein, D. F. Marlowe, D.B & Platt, J. J. (2001). Relapse: Contributing Factors,
Causative Models and Empirical Considerations. New Haven, CT, US: Yale University Press.
Figley, C. R. (2002). Compassion fatigue: Psychotherapists’ chronic lack of self care. Journal of Clinical
Psychology, 58(11), 1433–1441. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10090
Knight, C. (2010). Indirect trauma in the field practicum: Secondary traumatic stress, vicarious
trauma, and compassion fatigue among social work students and their instructors. Journal of
Baccalaureate Social Work, 15 (1), 31-52. https://doi.org/10.5555/basw.15.1.1568283x21397357
Lombardo, B., & Eyre, C.(2011). Compassion Fatigue: A Nurse’s Primer. The Online Journal of Issues in
Nursing (16). Doi : 10.3912/OJIN.Vol16No01mAN03.
Mc Govern, M. P. Xie, H. Y. Segal, S. R. Siembab, L & Drake, R.E. 2006. Addiction Treatment Services
and Co-occurring disorders: Prevalence Estimates, Treatment Practices, and Barriers. Journal of
Substance Abuse Treatment (31), 267-275. Doi: 10.1016/j.sat.2006.05.003
Ogborne, A.C. Braun, K. & Schmidt, G. (1998). Working in Addictions Treatment Services: Some
views of a sample of Service Providers in Ontario. Substance Use & Misuse (33), 2425-2240.
Osborn, C.J. (2004). Seven Salutary Suggestions for Counselor Stamina. Journal of Counseling &
Development (82), 319-328. http://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2004.tb00317.x
Peterson, K. H. (1990). Occupational Stress and Burnout Among Addiction Counselors. Dissertation
Abstracts International (50), 2781-2782
Thompson, I. A., Amatea, E.S., & Thompson, E. S. (2014). Personal and Contextual Predictors of
Mental Health Counselor’s Compassion Fatigue and Burnout. Journal of Mental Health Counseling (36),
58-77