WHP 5-5-1 Read - Overview of New Economic Systems - 1100L
WHP 5-5-1 Read - Overview of New Economic Systems - 1100L
WHP 5-5-1 Read - Overview of New Economic Systems - 1100L
By Eman M. Elshaikh
We’re used to credit cards now, but the very idea of credit, interest, and
banking were pretty radical innovations in our economic history—and they
led to the emergence of capitalism in Europe.
1100L
Overview of New Economic Systems
Eman M. Elshaikh
Introduction
A character in Shakespeare’s Hamlet gave his son some stern advice when he said: “Neither a borrower nor a
lender be.” His words reflected the idea that lending money was immoral, at least in his own society in England.
But if you look at the economic history of the world in Era 5 (when Hamlet was written), people didn’t really follow
that advice. By Shakespeare’s time, lending money had become incredibly common, especially in England, but also
in other parts of the world! It enabled many major economic, social and political transformations. It was part of a
broader pattern of economic change that completely reshaped production and distribution around the world; formed
new networks; created a middle class; and also contributed to the rise of nation-states and capitalism.
Innovations in finance
In order to understand these changes, we’re going to need to step back to a moment in history when credit wasn’t
so widespread. But first, let’s define it. Credit is an agreement between a borrower and a lender that a loan will be
repaid later. In many cases, the agreement includes interest. Interest is what the borrower must repay in addition to
the value of the initial loan. There are some ancient examples of credit and interest. Archaeologists have discovered
ancient Mesopotamian tablets from the second millennium BCE that have financial contracts carved into them
describing an amount of barley that must be paid back.
Mesopotamian tablet from c. 1780 BCE with a contract for a loan of barley carved in cuneiform.
By the Metropolitan Museum of Art, public domain.
So why did a Shakespearean character say it was so wrong 3,600 years later? Why was it not commonly used? First,
charging interest was banned by the Christian Church and by other religious institutions. So non-Christian groups,
who were often were excluded from economic opportunities, tended to be the only ones who did it. Becoming
money-lenders only increased discrimination against them. In fact, another of Shakespeare’s play, The Merchant of
Venice, features a Jewish money-lender named Shylock as its central villain, reflecting an antisemitic stereotype.
2
Overview of New Economic Systems
Eman M. Elshaikh
Fun fact: the English word for check came from the third century Persian word čak, which became the Arabic word
sakk during the Abbasid Caliphate!
currency for debits and transfers. Trade got more efficient, because now you could move money without having
to use coins or bills of exchange.
Bonds
Around this time, banks started to manage money on much larger scales, including dealing with government debt.
For example, when the English government needed money to finance a war with France, the Bank of England sold
bonds to its customers. Bonds were basically loans to the government, which individuals could give through a bank,
and the government promised to pay back the loan plus interest at a later date.
Sealing of the Bank of England Charter (1694), by Lady Jane Lindsay, 1905. Public domain.
Joint-stock companies were the answer. Ownership of a joint-stock company was shared by several investors—
they simply split initial costs and shared the profits. High-risk, high-profit business ventures became more common.
4
Overview of New Economic Systems
Eman M. Elshaikh
Yes, they could still fail, but joint-stock companies minimized individual losses. The company basically became a
separate thing so that no one person took on a huge burden. Soon, stock markets emerged, making it easy to buy
and sell shares in a company. For better or for worse, a much larger segment of the population were now traders.
Empires as businesses
Strictly speaking, joint-stock companies were not new, since we know they were used in the Song Dynasty in
China around 1000 CE. They were also around in a different form in the Muslim world. But in the sixteenth and
seventeenth centuries, the joint-stock model really took off on a more international scale, starting in Europe.
Imperialism as a private business may sound strange, but joint-stock companies were often able to fund colonizing
projects better than governments. Running an empire was not cheap, since travel and administration costs really
added up. So when it came to building overseas empires, joint-stock companies were key. Among the wealthiest
were the British East India Company and the Dutch East India Company. These were companies, not governments,
yet they performed colonial administration in India on behalf of the British and the Dutch.
As Europeans gained access to spices and other goods from around the globe, consumer demand increased
dramatically—and a quick walk through your grocery story will show the demand never went away. Things like
sugar, pepper and coffee had been too expensive to import into Europe. But under European imperialism, they were
valuable commodities as raw materials, which were then turned into highly profitable finished goods.
A painting by the Flemish artist Andries van Eertvelt depicting ships returning from an early Dutch trading expedition to the East Indies
in 1599, with the city of Amsterdam visible on the right. Public domain.
5
Overview of New Economic Systems
Eman M. Elshaikh
A global competition
European countries, which wanted to control resources across the globe, began to see other nations as
competition. Many European countries promoted mercantilist policies. Mercantilism is an economic philosophy in
which a government uses its economy to expand political power, prohibiting free trade. The goal is to sell more than
you buy to make your country wealthier and more self-sufficient.
These economic policies made imperialists hungry for more colonies for a couple of reasons. First, new land was
a source of raw materials needed to make all the stuff that had become so marketable. Second, the colonies were
new places for Europeans to sell their finished goods. But it didn’t go both ways; colonial and indigenous inhabitants
were not able to trade with other countries.
Conclusion
It’s impossible to overstate the dramatic effects of these economic changes. Credit was not new, but it got a
major reboot in Era 5. Financial innovations like joint-stock companies directly contributed to the expansion of
colonial systems. The other big reboot was production and distribution, with production of goods concentrated
in the European colonies, but their distribution going to both Europe and the colonies. Goods, money and people
flowed through new networks, completely reorganizing communities into nations with distinct classes. And those
classes and nations—particularly in Europe—eventually adopted a capitalist economy that would completely change
production and distribution globally.
6
Overview of New Economic Systems
Eman M. Elshaikh
Sources:
Ashtor, Eliyahu. “Banking Instruments Between the Muslim East and the Christian West” 3 (1972). http://www.jeeh.it/
articolo?urn=urn:abi:abi:RIV.JOU:1972;3.553&ev=1.
Banaji, Jairus. “Islam, the Mediterranean and the Rise of Capitalism.” Historical Materialism 15, no. 1 (2007): 47–74. https://doi.
org/10.1163/156920607X171591.
Ferguson, Niall. The Ascent of Money : A Financial History of the World. New York: Penguin Press, 2008.
Goetzmann, William N. Money Changes Everything : How Finance Made Civilization Possible. Princeton: Princeton University
Press, 2016. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/uchicago/docDetail.action?docID=11169727.
Goetzmann, William N., K. Geert Rouwenhorst –, Marc van de Mieroop –, Ulrike Malmendier –, Valerie Hansen, Ana Mata-Fink
–, Richard von Glahn –, et al., eds. The Origins of Value : The Financial Innovations That Created Modern Capital Markets.
Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Heck, Gene W. Charlemagne, Muhammad, and the Arab Roots of Capitalism. Studien Zur Geschichte Und Kultur Des Islamischen
Orients (2004) ; Berlin ; New York: De Gruyter, 2006.
Labib, Subhi Y. “Capitalism in Medieval Islam.” The Journal of Economic History 29, no. 1 (1969): 79–96.
Lieber, Alfred E. “Eastern Business Practices and Medieval European Commerce.” The Economic History Review 21, no. 2 (1968):
230–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/2592433.
Quinn, Stephen F., and William Roberds. “The Evolution of the Check as a Means of Payment: A Historical Survey.” Economic
Review, 2008. https://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedaer/y2008nv.93no.4.html.
Saeed, A, and O Salah. “Development of Sukuk: Pragmatic and Idealist Approaches to Sukuk Structures,” no. 1 (2013): 12.
Skeen, Bradley. “Trade and Exchange: The Islamic World.” In Encyclopedia of Society and Culture in the Medieval World, edited by
Pam J. Crabtree, 1093–95. Facts on File Library of World History. New York: Facts On File, 2008.
Udovitch, Abraham L. Bankers without Banks : Commerce, Banking, and Society in the Islamic World of the Middle Ages. Princeton,
N.J.: Program in Near Eastern Studies, Princeton University, 1981.
“What Is Capitalism? - Back to Basics - Finance & Development, June 2015.” Accessed July 30, 2019. https://www.imf.org/
external/pubs/ft/fandd/2015/06/basics.htm.
Eman M. Elshaikh
The author of this article is Eman M. Elshaikh. She is a writer, researcher, and teacher who has taught K-12 and undergraduates
in the United States and in the Middle East and written for many different audiences. She teaches writing at the University of
Chicago, where she also completed her master’s in social sciences and is currently pursuing her PhD. She was previously a World
History Fellow at Khan Academy, where she worked closely with the College Board to develop curriculum for AP World History.
Image credits
Cover: The courtyard of the Beurs in Amsterdam, Emanuel de Witte, public domain. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_
courtyard_of_the_Beurs_in_Amsterdam,_by_Emanuel_de_Witte.jpg
Mesopotamian tablet from c. 1780 BCE with a contract for a loan of barley carved in cuneiform. By the Metropolitan Museum of
Art, Public domain. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/321821.
A page from the Liber Abaci. Public domain. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liber_Abaci#/media/File:Liber_abbaci_magliab_f124r.jpg.
Sealing of the Bank of England Charter (1694), by Lady Jane Lindsay, 1905. Public domain. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_of_
England#/media/File:Bank_of_England_Charter_sealing_1694.jpg.
A painting by the Flemish artist Andries van Eertvelt depicting ships returning from an early Dutch trading expedition to the East
Indies in 1599, with the city of Amsterdam visible on the right. Public domain. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_
Return_to_Amsterdam_of_the_Second_Expedition_to_the_East_Indies_on_19_July_1599.jpg#/media/File:The_Return_to_
Amsterdam_of_the_Second_Expedition_to_the_East_Indies_on_19_July_1599.jpg.
7
Overview of New Economic Systems
Eman M. Elshaikh