En48 10 21 1984 Eng

1+ Environment
Canada
Environnement
Canada
Environmental Service de la
Protection . protection de
Service I'environnement
ENVIRO
1IIIIl
Technical
1IIl
III
Information fo r
•• FERRIC CHLORIDE
Ir~blem
SPillS
,.•
-T~---
TP 1:-.
233
F4713 .i
1984
I
,i .,\
Augus( 1984
{ - -
Canada ~emlmJiIl~i~jllllmlfifmj Ililim

38510097
ENVIRONMENT AL AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION FOR PROBLEM SPILLS MANUALS
Environmental and Technical Information for Problem Spills (EnviroTIPS)

manuals provide detailed information on chemical substances. This information is
intended to assist the reader in designing countermeasures for spills and to assess their
impact on the environment. The manual has been reviewed by the Technical Services
Branch, Environmental Protection Service, and approved for publication. Approval does
not necessarily signify that the contents reflect the views and policies of the
Environmen'ta(pt~\~tiioh Service. Mention of tra?e names or commer~ial products does
not constitute endb.rsement for use.
FERRIC CHLORIDE
ENVIRONMENT AL AND TECHNICAL INFORMA nON FOR PROBLEM SPILLS
Technical Services Branch

Environmental Protection Programs Directorate
Environmental Protection Service
Ottawa, Ontario
August 1984-
'I'!e;:,oo"'-'-r':""~"-.~~-.''''''.---'''--- ~""",~~,~",,-~.~,,!..~.~,;....q.""t-'rI",,~.,\.
:;~A:.. ~·;
1
'T
f
~$V~;;' ... ,::1\;.)
;,'
·oJ(
© Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1984

Cat. No. En 4S I0/21-1984E
o
ISBN 0-662-13484-2
BEAUREGARD PRESS LIMITED
FOREWORD
The Environmental and Technical Information for Problem Spills (Enviro TIPS)
manuals were initiated in 1981 to provide comprehensive information on chemicals that
are spilled frequently in Canada. The manuals are intended to be used by spill specialists
for designing countermeasures for spills and to assess their effects on the environment.
The major focus of EnviroTIPS manuals is environmental. The manuals are not intended
to be used by first-response personnel because of the length and technical content; a
number of manuals intended for first-response use are available. The information
presented in this manual was largely obtained from literature review. Efforts were made,
both in compilation and in review, to ensure that the information is as correct as possible.
Publication of these data does not signify that they are recommended by the Government
of Canada, nor by any other group.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The final version of this manual was prepared by the staff of the
Environmental Protection Service who wrote extensive revisions to the text, drafted
illustrations and incorporated all comments and additions.
The level of detail present was made possible by the many individuals,
organizations and associations who provided technical data and comments throughout the
compilation and subsequent review. The draft of this manual was prepared under contract
to Environment Canada by M.M. Dillon Consulting Engineers and Planners, Concord
Scientific Corporation, and Waterloo Engineering Limited.
iii
T ABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
FOREWORD
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
LIST OF FIGURES vii
LIST OF TABLES viii
1 SUMMARY 1
2 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL DATA 3
3 COMMERCE AND PRODUCTION 11
3.1 Grades and Concentrations 11

3.2 Domestic Manufacturer 11
3.3 Other Supplier 11
3.4 Major Transportation Routes 11
3.5 Production Levels 11
3.6 Manufacture of Ferric Chloride 11
3.6.1 General 11
3.6.2 Raw Materials 12
3.6.3 Manufacturing Process 12
3.7 Major Uses in Canada 12
3.8 Major Buyers in Canada 13
MATERIAL HANDLING AND COMPATIBILITY 14
4.1 Containers and Transportation Vessels 14

4.1.1 General 14
4.1.1.1 Railway tank cars 14
4.1.1.2 Tank motor vehicles 15
4.1.2 Packaging 15
4.2 Off-loading 16
4.2.1 Off-loading Equipment and Procedures for Railway Tank Cars 16
4.2.2 Off-loading Equipment and Procedures for Tank Motor Vehicles 18
4.2.3 Specifications and Materials for Off-loading Equipment 18
4.3 Compatibility with Materials of Construction 19
5 CONT AMINANT TRANSPORT 26
5.1 General Summary 26

5.2 Leak Nomograms 26
5.2.-1 Introduction 26
5.2.2 Nomograms 27
5.2.2.1 Figure 7: Percent remaining versus time 27
5.2.2.2 Figure 8: Discharge rate versus time 27
5.2.3 Sample Calculations 27
iv
Page
5.3 DIspersion in the AIr 29

5.4 BehavlOur in Water 29
5.4.1 Introduction 29
5.4.2 Nomograms 30
5.4.2.1 Nomograms for non-tidal rivers 31
5.4.2.2 Nomograms for lakes or still water bodies 39
5.4.3 Sample CalculatlOns 39
5.4.3.1 Pollutant concentratlOn in non-tidal rivers 39
5.4.3.2 Average pollutant concentration in lakes
or stIll water bodIes 42
5.5 Subsurface BehavlOur: Penetration mto Soil 43
5.5.1 Mechanisms 43
5.5.2 Equations Describing Ferric Chlonde Movement into Soil 44
5.5.3 Saturated Hydraulic ConductIvity of Ferric Chloride in Soil 44
5.5.4 Soils 46
5.5.5 PenetratlOn Nomograms 46
5.5.6 Sample Calculation 46
6 ENVIRONMENT AL DATA 52
6.i Suggested or Regulated Limits 52

6.1.1 Water 52
6.1.2 AIr 52
6.2 AquatIc ToxicIty 52
6.2.1 U.S. Toxicity Rating 52
6.2.2 Measured Toxicities 52
6.2.2.1 Freshwater toxicity 52
6.2.3 AquatiC Studies 56
6.3 ToxicIty to Other Biota 56
6.3.1 LIvestock 56
6.3.2 Plants 56
6.3.3 Insects 56
6.4 DegradatlOn 57
6.4.1 Chemical Degradation 57
6.5 Long-term Fate and Effects 57
7 HUMAN HEALTH 58
7.1 Recommended Exposure L1.lJuts 58

7.2 Irritation Data 58
7.2.1 Skin Contact 58
7.2.2 Eye Contact 59
7.3 Threshold Perception PropertIes 59
7.3.1 Odour 59
7.3.2 Taste 59
7.4 Long-term Studies 59
7.4.1 Inhalation 59
7.4.2 Ingestion 61
7.4.3 Intraperitoneal 62
7;4.4 Intravenous 62
v
Page
7.4.5 Subcutaneous 63
7.4.6 Carcinogenicity, Teratogemcity, Mutagenicity 63
7.5 Symptoms of Exposure 64
7.5.1 Inhalation of Dust or SolutiOn Vapour 64
7.5.2 Ingestion 64
7.5.3 Skin Contact 64
7.5.4 Eye Contact 65
7.6 Human Toxicity to Decay or Combustion Products 65
7.6.1 Hydrogen Chloride, Ferrous Chlonde and Chlorine 65
8 CHEMICAL COMPATIBILITY 67
8.1 Compatibility of Ferric Chloride wlth Other Chemicals

and Chemical Groups 67
9 COU NTERMEASU RES 69
9.1 Recommended Handling Procedures 69

9.1.1 FIre Concerns 69
9.1.2 Fire Extinguishing Agents 69
9.1.3 Spill Actions 69
9.1.3.1 General 69
9.1.3.2 Spills on land 69
9.1.3.3 Spills in water 70
9.1.4 Cleanup and Treatment 70
9.1.4.1 General 70
9.1.5 Disposal 70
9.1.6 Protective Measures 71
9.1.7 Storage Precautions 71
9.2 Specialized Countermeasures Equipment, Materials or Systems 71
10 PREVIOUS SPILL EXPERIENCE 72
10.1 Tank Spill 72
11 ANAL YTICAL METHODS 73
11.1 Quantitative Method for the Detection of Ferric Chlonde in Air 73

11.1.1 Atomic Absorption
11.2 Qualitative Method for the Detection of Ferric Chloride in Air 74
11.3 Quantitative Method for the Detection of Fernc Chloride in
Water 74
11.3.1 Atomic AbsorptiOn 74
11.4- Qualitative Method for the DetectiOn of Ferric Chloride in Water 74
11.5 Quantltative Method for the Detection of Ferric Chloride in
SOlI 75
11.5.1 Spectrophotometric Method 75
11.6 Qualitative Method for the Detection of Ferric Chloride in SOlI 76
VI
Page
12 REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY 77
12.1 References 77
12.2 Bibliography 83
vii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1 PHASE DIAGRAM OF THE FeC13°H20 SYSTEM 8
2 DENSITY OF SOLUTIONS 9
3 VAPOUR PRESSURE vs TEMPERATURE 9
PHASE DIAGRAM 10
5 TYPICAL DRUM CONTAINER 17
6 TANK CAR WITH PUNCTURE HOLE IN BOTTOM 27
7 PERCENT REMAINING vs TIME 28
8 DISCHARGE RATE vs TIME 28
9 FLOWCHART TO DETERMINE POLLUTANT CONCENTRATION

IN NON-TIDAL RIVERS 32
10 TIME vs DISTANCE 33
11 HYDRAULIC RADIUS vs CHANNEL WIDTH 34
12 DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT vs HYDRAULIC RADIUS 35

13 ALPHA vs DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT 36
14 ALPHA vs DELTA 37
15 MAXIMUM CONCENTRATION vs DELTA 38
16 VOLUME vs RADIUS 40
17 AVERAGE CONCENTRATION vs VOLUME 41
18 SCHEMA TIC SOIL TRANSPORT 45

19 FLOWCHART FOR NOMOGRAM USE 47
20 PENETRATION IN COARSE SAND 48
21 PENETRATION IN SILTY SAND 49
22 PENETRATION IN CLAY TILL 50

viii
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 CONVERSION NOMOGRAMS 7
2 RAIL WAY TANK CAR SPECIFICATIONS 14
3 TANK MOTOR VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS 15
4 DRUMS 16
5 COMPATIBILITY WITH MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION 19
6 MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION 23
1
1 SUMMARY
FERRIC CHLORIDE (FeCI)
Brown to black solid, or yellow-brown to reddish brown solution with a slightly acidic
odour
SYNONYMS
Ferric Chloride, Solid, Solution, Anhydrous, Hexahydrate; Iron (III) Chloride; Iron
Sesquichloride; Iron Trichloride; Chlorure Ferrique (Fr.); Perchlorure de Fer (Fr.)
KDENTIFKCA nON NUMBERS
UN No. 1773 (solid), 2582 (solution); CAS No. 7705-08-0; OHM-T ADS No. 7217242; STCC
No. 4944138 (solid), 4932343 (solution)
COMMON GRADES & CONCENTRAnONS
Solid: 96 to 99 percent anhydrous ferric chloride

Solution: 29 to 46 percent aqueous solution
Hexahydrate: equivalent FeCI3, 60 percent
IMMEDIATE CONCERNS
Fire: Not combustible

Human Health: Irritating on contact. Corrosive
Environment: Harmful to some species of aquatic life at concentrations as low as 5 mg/L
PHYSICAL PROPERTY DATA
State: (l5°C, 1 atm): solid Solubility (in water): 74.4 g/lOO mL (O°C)
Boiling Point: decomposes at Behaviour (in water): sinks and mixes; solid
315-319°C reacts exothermically, producing corrosive
Melting Point: 306°C HCl fumes
Flammability: not combustible
Specific Gravity (water = 1): 2.9 (anhydrous)
(25°C/4°C); 1.4 (42°Be solution)
ENVIRONMENT AL CONCERNS
May persist in the environment indefinitely, usually in an insoluble form. Does not
biodegrade. Potential exists for accumulation of iron in the aquatic environment for
marine and freshwater plants, invertebrates, fish.
2
HUMAN HEALTH
TLV®: 1 mg/m 3 (as Fe)

IDLH: not established
Exposure Effects
Inhalation: When material is misted or sprayed in air, irritation of upper respiratory tract
may occur. Dust is an irritant
Contact: Prolonged contact with solution will cause skin staining and may cause
dermatitis similar to that caused by weak acids. Irritating to eyes
IMMEDIATE ACTION
Spill Control
Restrict access to spill site. Issue warning: "CORROSIVE". Notify manufacturer and
appropriate environmental authorities. Stop the flow and contain spill, if safe to do so.
Avoid contact with solution and solid. Keep contaminated water from entering sewers or
watercourses.
Fire Control
Not combustible. Use water spray or fog, foam, dry chemical or carbon dioxide.
COUNTERMEASURES
Emergency Control Procedures in/on
Soil: Construct barriers to contain spill. Remove material by manual or mechanical

means. Absorb small amounts of spilled liquid with sand or other absorption
materials. Shovel solid into covered containers
Water: Contain by damming or water diversion. Precipitate by treating with sodium
bicarbonate. Filter or allow solids Ito settle. Dredge or vacuum pump to remove
contaminated bottom sediments
3
2 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL DATA
Physical State Properties
Appearance Brown-black solid (CRC 1980), or an orange-

brown aqueous solution 1 (CHRIS 1978)
Usual shipping state(s) Liquid (aqueous solution) or solid (anhydrous
or hexahydrate)
Physical state at l5°C, Solid
1 atm
Melting point 306°C (CRC 1982)
Boiling point Decomposes at 315-319°C (Hawley 1977;
Merck 1983; CRC 1982)
Decom posi tion tern perature 315-319°C
Densities
Specific gravity Solid: 2.898 (25°/4°C) (CRC 1982)

Solution: 1.408 05.5°C) (42°Be, 39 percent
solution) (CRC 1980)
Fire Properties
Flammability Noncombustible (CHRIS 1978)

Heat of decomposition 43.76 kJ/mole (332°C) (JANAF 1971)
Decomposition products Ferrous chloride and chlorine (Merck 1976;
Bailar 1973; Kirk-Othmer 1981)
Other Properties
Molecular weight of pure substance 162.21 (eRC 1982)

Constituent components of typical Solid: 96-99 percent FeCl3
commercial grade Solution: 29-46 percent FeCl3
Hexahydrate: equivalent 60 percent FeCI3,
60 percent equivalent H20 (Ullmann 1975)
Viscosity 9.655 mPaos (40 percent aqueous solution
20°C) (CRC 1982)
1 Solutions containing ferric ion are characteristically yellow-brown due to the

presence of FeOH++. Ferric ion (Fe 3 +) is colourless or pale purple but undergoes
hydrolysis in aqueous solution: Fe+ 3 + H20 ~ FeOH++ + H+. A red-brown solution
indicates the presence of Fe(OH3) or more correctly Fe203oxH20. Addition of
nitric acid (HN03) to a ferric solution will make the colour disappear, whereas
addition of HCI will form a yellow solution (FeCI++ is yellow) (Cotton 1972; Sienko
1961; Hogness 1954). Thus the range of possibilities for a solution colour may be
colourless to pale purple to yellow or yellow-brown to reddish-brown.
Hygroscopicity Very hygroscopic (Merck 1976)
Latent heat of fusion 43.1 kJ/mole (at melting point) (JANAF 1971)
Heat of formation -362.81 kJ/mole (25°C) (JANAF 1971)
Heat of solution -132.7 kJ/mole (18°C) (Perry 1973)
Heat capacity
constant pressure (Cp) 134 J/(moleoOC) (25°C) (JANAF 1971)
96 J/(mole o°C) (25°C) (CRC 1982)
pH of aqueous solution 5 percent solution of hexahydrate has a pH of
1.7 (Kirk-Othmer 1981)
Solubility
In water Anhydrous: 74.4 g/100 mL (DOC),

535.7 g/lOO mL (lOO°C) (CRC 1982)
Hexahydrate: 91.9 g/mL (20°C) (CRC 1982)
In other common materials Anhydrous: in Acetone, 63 g/l 00 mL (18°C)
(CRC 1980); soluble in ethanol, methanol,
diethyl ether (CRC 1982); nitriles and amines
(Bailar 1973); glycerol (Hawley 1971); and
ketones (Ullmann 1975)
Hexahydrate: soluble in ethanol and diethyl
ether (CRC 1982)
Summary of Ferric Chloride Chemistry
Ferric chloride occurs as hygroscopic, hexagonal, dark (brown-black) crystals.

It can be prepared from the reaction of iron with gaseous chlorine at 350°C, from the
reaction of ferric oxide (Fe203) with hydrogen chloride at up to 1000°C, or by other
methods such as heating ferric oxide and carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) under pressure. The
thermal stability of the ferric halides decreases from the fluoride to the iodide: ferric
fluoride (FeF3) sublimes at a temperature greater than lOOO°C, while the chloride
sublimes above 300°C with noticeable decomposition to ferrous chloride (FeCl2) and
chlorine:
An excess of chlorine must be present to deter decomposition during the purification

(sublimation) process. In the vapour phase (at 400°C), ferric chloride exists as a dimer; at
750°C, it exists as a monomer. In the solid phase, the crystalline material has a
semicovalent layer structure with hexagonal packing of chloride ions. Each ion atom is
surrounded octahedrally by six chlorine atoms. Ferric chloride is the most commonly
encountered of the iron halides; the hexahydrate (FeCly6H20), a yellow, lumpy material,
5
CI CI CI
CI
'Fe/ ~ FeJf
/ "" CI
/ ,
CI
is the next most common. The ferric ion is a relatively strong oxidizing agent, and can
also be used as a chlorinating agent and in the manufacture of ink, pigments and dyes. It
is also extensively used in the treatment of sewage and industrial waste gases (Bailar
1973; Cotton 1972; Kirk-Othmer 1981).
Ferric chloride is soluble in water, methanol, ethanol, acetone and generally in
ethers, ketones, nitriles and amines. It is relatively insoluble in nonpolar solvents such as
benzene. It is also insoluble in ethyl acetate. Complexes are formed in donor solvents.
The chloride is freely soluble in water; many hydrates (e.g., FeC13onH20, where n = 10, 6,
3.5, 2.5 and 2) have been identified. The anhydrous chloride undergoes hydration in moist
air, forming the yellow-brown hexahydrate (FeCI] °6H20 - the actual structure is
trans-(FeCI2(H20)4)Clo2H20). The hexahydrate can also be crystallized from acidified
aqueous solution. The solid material is soluble in water, ethanol, diethyl ether and
acetone, generally with the formation of solvates, e.g., FeC1302C2H50H. Hydrolysis and
hydroxylation occur in aqueous solution to such an extent that the pH of a 5 percent
solution is 1.7. Upon standing, gelatinous hydroxy compounds begin to precipitate. Drying
of the compound at selected temperatures produces a series of lesser hydrated species
(Bailar 1973; Kirk-Othmer 1981).
Aqueous solutions of ferric chloride are strongly acidic. They dissolve
electropositive metals, such as magnesium, with evolution of hydrogen and liberate carbon
dioxide from alkali metal carbonates. In both cases, hydrous iron (III) oxide (FeO(OH» is
precipitated. The hydrolysis of the hexaquoferric ion in dilute solutions can be
represented by the following equations:
1. (Fe(H20)6)+3 + H20 (Fe(H20)5(OH»+2 + H]O+ (yellow)

2~ (Fe(H20)5(OH»+2 + H20 (Fe(H20)4(OH)2)+ + H30+
3. (Fe(H20)4(OH)2)+ + H20 (Fe(OH)3(H20)3) + H30+
4. (Fe(OH)3(H20)3) FeO(OH) + 4H20-}
The extent of hydrolysis is very great even at a pH of 2 to 3. In order to have a solution

containing primarily the hexaquo ferric ion (Fe(H206)+3), the pH must be around O. The
6
latter ion is pale purple in colour. The various hydroxo species (equations 1 and 2) are
yellow; thus, aqueous solutions of ferric salts even with noncomplexing anions are yellow
unless strongly acid. As the pH is increased above the 2-3 range, equations 2 and 3
predominate; ultimately, hydrous ferric oxide is precipitated as a red-brown gelatinous
mass. In more concentrated solutions of ferric chloride, chloride ions enter the
coordination sphere of the iron, and octahedral species such as (FeCl4(H20)2f
predominate. If hydrochloric acid is added to a concentrated solution, a polymeric species
is formed which consists of alternating FeCl4 (tetrahedral) and FeCl4(H20)2 (octahedral)
units with adjacent units sharing a chloride ion. On the other hand, dilute solutions
(0.68 M) of ferric chloride in concentrated hydrochloric acid contain primarily the
tetrahedral tetrachloroferrate (III) anion (FeCI4 -). Other chloro complexes that occur in
crystalline compounds are FeC16-3 and Fe2C19-3 (Bailar 1973; Cotton 1972).
7 TABLE 1
FERRIC CHLORIDE CONVERSION NOMOGRAMS
°c -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

I I I
Temperature
of -40
I I
I I
I
I
0
I
I
I
50
I
I
I
I
100
I
I
I
150
I
I
I
I I
I
I
200
I
Pressure 1 kPa = 1 000 Pa
kPa 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
I I
Atmospheres 0
I 0.1
I
I
I
I
0.2 0.3
I
I
0.4
I
I
0.5
I
I
0.6
I
I
I
0.7 0.8
I
I
I
0.9
I
1.0
I
kPa 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
psi 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
kPa 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
I I
mmHg(torr) 0
I I
100
I
200
I
300
I
400
I i
I
500
Ii
600
I
I I
r
700 800
Viscosity
Dynamic 1 Pa·s = 1 000 centipoise (cP)
Kinematic 1 m 2 /s = 1 000000 centistokes (cSt) Concentration (in water)

1 ppm:: 1 mg/L
Energy (heat) 1 kJ = 1 000 J
kJ 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Ii Ii
kcal
I
0
i I I
5
I i
I I
10
I i
I
15
r
Ii i
r
20 25
r
kJ 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
BTU
I
0 10
I
20
r
I
30
I
I
40
I
I
r
50
I
60
I
I
r
70 80 90
I
100
I
kg/m 3 o 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
I I
Density
Ib/ft3
I
o
I
I
2
I
3
I
4 5 6
I
8 FIGU RE 1
FERRIC CHLORIDE PHASE DIAGRAM OF THE FeCb-H20 SYSTEM
Referen ce: LIN KE 1958
300~------4--------+--------~------+-------~
250~------~-------r------~--------+-----r-~
200
I FeCb
------
u
0
Q)
-- 150
~
:::>
ro
~
Q)
Cl..
E
Q)
I-
100
50 ~-----+------+----FeCb-3.5H20 ~"-----I
:.• :::r::
• (',J
~
~'\~\. -"- : ~~~
. ~~ .... :I:: u....
~ " <.n.
,-,'<.i FeCb-6H20: ~.
o ""
t--".;;;;;::::----~---------bJj~--____l--.- U
• C"')
---t------I
~~ .~
Y . .:
-50 t---- FeCI -10H 0 ~. ~:~----+-----+----~
3 2
·
···
o 20 40 60 80 100
Weight Percent (FeCb)
9
FIGURE 2
FERRIC CHLORIDE (HEXAHYDRATE) DENSITY OF SOLUTIONS
Reference: CRC 1982
1.5 48
~
1.4 41
::::::J
E V ~
\Q.)
'-...
0.0
1.3 l/ 33
co
a
~
-:>.
C /)
co
Q.)
V
V o
C/)
CO
Q.)
0 1.2 24
V
1.1 ~
V
13
V
1.0 ~
V o
o 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40
FIGURE 3
VAPOUR PRESSURE
FERRIC CHLORIDE
VS TEMPERATURE
Referen ce: CRC 1982
100 ./
k""
./
.--...
/
C'o:::J
Cl...
...>0::
10 ./
/
Q.)
...... /"
:::s
C/)
V
/
C/)
Q.)
......
Cl...
......
:::s
0
c.
C'o:::J
1 /
:> ./
./
/
V
0.1 /
175 200 225 250 275 300 325
Temperature rC)
10
FIGURE 4
FERRIC CHLORIDE PHASE DIAGRAM
145
I
"'C
.-
:::I
cr
I ---.J
Ps .... ...... II
95 'I
~
I
~
a...
...::.::
Q)
......
:::I
(I)
Solid Gas
en
Q)
...... 45 t---- J
L
a...
I
20
V
~
0 I
0 60 120 180 240 300 ~ 360
Ts
Temperature (OC) TO (decomposes)
11
3 COMMERCE AND PRODUCTION
3.1 Grades and Concentrations (PC 1981; Ullmann 1975)
Ferric chloride is available as a solid (96 to 99 percent FeCI3, or as the

hexahydrate, FeC!306H20, with a purity of 60 percent, taken as FeCl3 equivalent) and in
solution form (sometimes referred to as coagulation or flocculation grades, with
concentrations from 29 percent to 4-5 percent).
3.2 Domestic Manufacturer (CCR 1978; Scott 1979)
Diversey Corporation of Canada

2645 Royal Windsor Drive
Mississauga, Ontario
L5J III
(416) 291-1137
3.3 Other Supplier (CBG 1980)
Pennwalt of Canada Ltd.

700 Third Line
Oakville, Ontario
L6J 5A3
(416) 827-9841
3.4 Major Transportation Routes
Since ferric chloride is used extensively in sewage treatment plants, it is

shipped across Canada.
3.5 Production Levels (PC 1981)
Capacity
Company, Plant Location· kilotonnes/yr (1981)
Diversey Wyandotte, Mississauga, Onto (solution) 23
3.6 Manufacture of Ferric Chloride (PC 1981)
3.6.1 General. Ferric chloride solution is made by reacting hydrochloric acid and
ferric oxide, or by chlorination of spent steel pickling liquor. (Pickling liquor is an acid,
usually hydrochloric, sulphuric or phosphoric, used to remove scale, oxides, or other
impurities from steel surfaces.)
12
3.6.2 Raw Materials. Materials used in the manufacture of ferric chloride include
hydrochloric acid, high-grade ferric oxide from steel processing, spent steel pickling
liquor, and chlorine.
3.6.3 Manufacturing Process. Two methods are used to produce ferric chloride
solution (Campbell 1982):
a) Ferric oxide dry cake (magnetite) from the steel industry, an iron-rich dust from the
process furnaces, is slurried and fed to a reactor system. Anhydrous hydrogen
chloride (usually a by-product material from the manufacture of chlorinated
hydrocarbons) is then added. Since the resulting ferric chloride solution contains
impurities, it is next fed to a purification system for processing and then to storage
from which it is shipped to the users. The overall reaction is represented by the
following equation:
Fe203 + 6HCI -+- 2FeCl3 + 31-120
Due to a shortage of magnetite coupled with increasing costs of the material, a

second process was developed and is currently in use in Canada.
b) Waste pickling liquor (ferrous chloride) from the steel industry is treated with
chlorine to produce usable ferric chloride:
2FeCl2 + Cl2 -+- 2FeCl3
Again, the chlorine may be considered a by-product material of the caustic soda
industry. Since waste pickling liquor may contain ferrous sulphate instead of the
chloride, this material may also be treated with chlorine. This results in the
presence of sulphate as well as chloride ions in the resulting solution containing the
ferric ion, but this is acceptable as the latter is the active ingredient for water
treatment purposes. Purification to remove undesirable contaminants is carried out
and the material made ready for shipment to the user.
3.7 Major Uses in Canada (PC 1981; Campbell 1982)
Ferric chloride solution is used for coagulation and flocculation in sewage

treatment plants, as a general chemical reagent, and for etching of electronic printed
circuit boards. It is also used for water purification and is particularly effective in
removal of phosphate from municipal sewage treatment plant effluents.
13
3.8 Major Buyers in Canada
Sewage treatment and water purification plants are the major buyers of the
product.
lit
4 MATERIAL HANDLING AND COMPATIBILITY
4.1 Containers and Transportation Vessels
4.1.1 General. Ferric chloride solutions are shipped bulk in specially designed
railway tank cars and tank motor vehicles.
Anhydrous or dry ferric chloride is shipped in drums and bags and other small
containers. The hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H20) is more corrosive to metals than the
anhydrous, and thus is shipped in nonmetallic or lined containers.
4.1.1.1 Railway tank cars. Railway tank cars used in the transportation of ferric
chloride solutions are listed in Table 2. Cars are equipped for unloading from the top by
compressed air. Ferric chloride is withdrawn through an eduction pipe which extends
from the bottom of the tank to the top operating platform where it terminates with a
63 mm (2 1/2 in.) blind flange. Air pressure of 207 kPa (30 psi) maximum is applied
through a 63 mm (2 1/2 in.) flange connection (FC).
TABLE 2 RAILWAY TANK CAR SPECIFICATIONS (RTDCR 1971t; TCM 1979)
CTC/DOT*
Specification
Number Description
103BW Steel fusion-welded tank with dome.

Uninsulated or insulated. Rubber-lined
tank. Top unloading arrangement required.
Bottom outlet or washout prohibited. Test
pressure It lit kPa (60 psi).
lllA60W5 Steel fusion-welded tank without dome.
Uninsulated or insulated. Rubber-lined tank.
2% minimum outage. Gauging device. Top
unloading arrangement required. Bottom
outlet or washout prohibited. Test pressure
Itllt kPa (60 psi).
lllAlOOW5 Steel fusion-welded tank without dome.
Uninsulated or insulated. Rubber-lined tank.
2% minimum outage. Gauging device. Top
unloading arrangement required. Bottom
outlet or washout prohibited. Test pressure
690 kPa (100 psi).
* Canadian Transport Commission and Department of Transportation (U.S.)

15
4.1.1.2 Tank motor vehicles. Ferric chloride solutions are frequently shipped by tank
motor vehicle. The capacities of the tank trucks are dependent upon the applicable
provincial truck weight regulations (FC). A double-axle type vehicle is the most common
carrier of ferric chloride solutions, ranging in capacity from 12 700 L to 19 000 L (2800-
4200 gal.) or 18 200 kg to 27 300 kg (40 000-60 000 lb.) net mass, respectively (PC 1972).
Similar to railway tank cars, these trailers are unloaded by compressed air not exceeding
207 kPa (30 psi) (HFC 1965).
Tank motor vehicles must conform to Transport Canada specification TC307
as outlined in Table 3 (TDGC 1980). As in the case of railway tank cars, the materials of
construction and thickness of material are similar. Highway tankers must be pressure
tested at 276 kPa (40 psi) minimum to allow for the compressed air pressure of 207 kPa
(30 psi) used during top unloading. The maximum working pressure of the tanker is in
effect 207 kPa (30 psi).
TABLE 3 TANK MOTOR VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS
Transport Canada
Specification Number Description
TC307 Steel butt-welded tank. Design and construct

(Incorporating MC304 in accordance with ASME Code when working
and MC307) pressures in excess of 345 kPa (50 psi).
Minimum design pressure 172 kPa (25 psi).
Gauging device required. Minimum one pres-
sure relief device per compartment. One
minimum 380 mm (15 in.) diameter manhole
per compartment. Bottom washout optional.
Corrosion allowance required. Minimum test
pressure 276 kPa (40 psi).
4.1.2 Packaging. Anhydrous ferric chloride is also transported in drums and bags.
Bags must have a minimum 3-ply moisture-resistant paper construction. Maximum net
mass is 50 kg (110 lb.) (TDGC 1980).
Drums fabricated from a variety of construction materials are permitted.
Table 4 lists drum types and descriptions (TDGC 1980).
16
TABLE 4 DRUMS
Type of Drum Designa tion Description Figure No.
Steel 1AI Nonremovable head, reusable

lAlA lAl with reinforced chime
IAlB lAI with welded closure flange
lAIC lAI with lead coating 5
lAID IAI with coating (other than
lead)
lA2 Removable head, reusable
lA2A lA2 with reinforced chime
lA2B lA2 with lead coating
lA3 Nonremovable head, single use
only
lA4 Removable head, single use only
Aluminum lBl Nonremovable head 5
lB2 Removable head
Plywood 102
Fibreboard IGI Convolutely wound plies. Maxi-
mum capacity 250 L (55 gal.)
Maximum net mass 400 kg
(882 lb.)
Plastic lHl Nonremovable head. Maximum
capacity 250 L (55 gal.) Maxi-
mum net mass 400 kg (882 lb.)
lH2 lHl except head removable
Steel Drums 6HAl Outer steel sheet in the shape
with inner of drum. Inner plastic recep-
plastic tacle. Maximum capacity
receptacles 225 L (49 gal.)
Plywood Drums 6HDl Outer plywood in shape of drum.
with inner Inner plastic receptacle.
plastic Maximum capacity 225 L
receptacles (49 gal.)
Fibreboard 6HGl Outer containers of convo-
Drums with lutely wound plies of fibreboard.
inner plastic Inner plastic receptacle in shape
receptacles of drum. Maximum capacity
225 L (49 gal.)
4.2 Off-loading
4.2.1 Off-loading Equipment and Procedures for Railway Tank Cars. Prior to off-
loading, certain precautions must be taken (HFC 1965):
17
FIGURE 5
FERRIC CHLORIDE TYPICAL DRUM CONTAINER
Typical steel drum (lined for ferric chloride service)

MIN. 2.4mm
LEAD COATING fOR
lAIC DESIGNATION - - - - - - - - - t r - - -
CONTENTS LABEL - - - - - - - - T
E
u
10
ro
BODY AND HEADS

CONSTRUCTED OF
1
ROLLED STEEL - - - - - - - -
MAX. CAPACITY
250 L
MAX. NET MASS

400 kg
53 em
-I
The storage tank must be checked to make sure that it will hold the contents of the
car.
Personnel must not enter the car under any circumstances.
Brakes must be set, wheels chocked and a derail employed.
A safe operating platform must be provided at the unloading point.
Proceed with off-loading as follows (HFC 1965):
After removing the safety vent cap and assembly from the air inlet flange, and the
blind flange from the liquid unloading connection, connect the 51 mm (2 in.)
unloading line and then the 25 mm (1 in.) air line. Air pressure must be reduced to
207 kPa (30 psi) for unloading. A safety relief valve must be installed in the air line
to release at 242 kPa (35 psi).
Apply air pressure to unload the car.
Once the car is empty, the air supply valve must be closed and the vent valve in the
air line opened to allow the line pressure to equalize to atmospheric pressure.
Reverse the above procedure to close up the car.
18
4.2.2 Off-loading Equipment and Procedures for Tank Motor Vehicles. The general
procedures for railway tank car unloading also apply to tank trailers (HFC 1965).
4.2.3 Specifications and Materials for Off-loading Equipment. The materials of

construction for off-loading system components discussed in this section along with
specifications refer to those generally used in ferric chloride solution service. It is
recognized that other materials may be used for particular applications as indicated in
Table 5. The components of a typical off-loading system that will be discussed include
pipes and fittings, flexible connections, valves, gaskets, pumps and storage tanks.
The corrosion of carbon steel in contact with aqueous solutions depends on
many factors, e.g., solution pH, dissolved oxygen in the water, temperature, dissolved
salts, and solution velocity. It is readily known that many inorganic salts are highly
corrosive to steel (corrosion rate of greater than 1.27 mm per year), with acidic or neutral
salts tending to increase corrosion rates and alkaline salts tending to lower corrosion
rates. Also important is whether the added salt yields soluble or insoluble reaction
products. Ferric chloride solutions fall into the highly corrosive category, primarily due
to chloride content, oxidizing character, and acidity. They are extremely corrosive to
carbon steel; their use with nickel and nickel-based alloys is limited. For example, acidic
solutions containing the oxidizing ferric ion accelerate the acidic corrosion of Alloy B (62-
70 percent Ni, 28 percent Mo). The ferric ions provide rapid and strong cathodic reactions
to support the anodic dissolution of nickel and molybdenum. The ferric ion is reduced to
the ferrous ion; if the solution contains a sufficient amount of dissolved oxygen to
regenerate the ferric ions, the corrosion can be maintained. Alloy C (59 percent Ni,
16 percent Mo and 16 percent Cr), on the other hand, can be used under 65°C and limited
concentrations, while Alloy 400 (65 percent Ni, 32 percent Cu) is severely corroded.
Types 304 and 316 stainless steels also suffer severe corrosion and chloride pitting when
exposed to ferric chloride solutions. These steels are also subject to stress corrosion
cracking. Materials listed as giving good service for the full range of solution
concentration up to boiling or to the temperature limit of the nonmetallic material are
tantalum, glass/silicates, carbon impregnated with furan or phenolic, Teflon (FEP/TFE),
furan resin, and epoxy resin (CE 1980b).
Schedule 40 seamless ASTM A106 carbon steel pipes and fittings lined or
coated with rubber or polyvinylidene fluoride are recommended (HFC 1965). Flanged
joints and welded connections should be used. The first portion of the unloading line
should be heavy-duty rubber hose.
19
The unloading line should be 51 mm (2 in.) pipe to suit the standard 63 x 50 mm

(2 1/2 x 2 in.) rubberized reducing elbow (FC) on ferric chloride solution tank cars. Pipe
under 25 mm (l in.) is not recommended. Outdoor lines must be self-draining (HFC 1965).
Cast iron or cast steel diaphragm valves lined with polyvinylidene chloride
resin will give best service (DPL V 1972). Viton gaskets can be used.
A flanged, sealless, magnetic drive centrifugal pump with wet end parts of 316
stainless steel is recommended for pumping. However, a rubber-lined centrifugal pump
with rotating and stationary Teflon seals may also be used (HFC 1965).
Welded steel storage tanks with rubber linings are commonly used. Exposed
surfaces are painted with a ferric chloride-resistant paint (FC). Storage tanks should be
sized to contain at least one and a half times the usual shipment (HFC 1965).
4.3 Compatibility with Materials of Construction.
The compatibility of ferric chloride with materials of construction is indicated

in Table 5. The unbracketed abbreviations are described in Table 6. The rating system
for this report is briefly described below.
Recommended: This material will perform satisfactorily in the given application.
Conditional: Material will show deterioration in the given application; however,

it may be suitable for intermittent or short-term service.
Not Recommended: Material will be severely affected in this application and should not
be used.
TABLE 5 COMPATIBILITY WITH MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION
Material of Construction
Chemical
Not
Application Cone. Temp. (OC) Recommended Conditional Recommended
1. Pipes and >5% 49 PE(DPPED

Fittings 1967)
52 PVDC(DCRG
1978)
60 PVC I
PVC II (DPPED
1967)
71 ABS(DPPED
1967)
20
TABLE 5 COMPA TIBILITY WITH MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION

(Cont'd)
Chemical
Not
1. Pipes and 107 PP (DCRG 1978)

Fittings
(Cont'd) 121 Chlorinated
Polyether
(DCRG 1978)
135 PVDF (DCRG
1978)
To operat- PVC I
ing limit ABS
of material PE (MWPP 1978)
Rubber- or
PVCD-lined CS,
Hard Rubber,
"Pyrex", PVC
Piping (HFC 1965)
2. Valves >5% 21 SS 316
(JSSV 1979)
3. Pumps >5% 93 GRP with FPM
"0" Ring
Cold High Silicon
Cast Iron
(HIS 1969)
4. Storage >5% CS, Lined with
to Semi-hard Rub-
saturated ber, Glass, Pheno-
lic Resins, Epoxy
Resins, PVC (HFC
1965)
Up to 40 ].lPVC,PE,PP
10% POM, NR, NBR,
IIR, EPDM,
CR, FPM, CSM
(GF)
5. Others 1%, 21 S5 304, 304L, Monel, Inconel
still 321, 347, 316, (5FC 1982)
316L, Ni (5FC
1982)
21

(Cont'd)
Ma ter ial of Construction

Chemical
Not
--------------------------
5. Others boiling 55 316, 316L SS 304, 304L,
(Cont'd) (SFC 1982) 321, 347,
Ni, Monel,
Inconel (SFC
1982)
5%, 21 SS 316, 316L, SS 304, 304L,
still Inconel (SFC 321, 347, Ni,
1982) Monel (SFC
1982)
5%, 21 Nb, SS 304, 304L, Ni, Monel (SFC
agitated Hastelloy C-276 321,347,316*, 1982)
(CE 1983) 316L, Inconel Alloy 20,
(SFC 1982) Hastelloy B-2
(CE 1983)
5%, 21 SS 304, 304L, Ni, Monel
aerated 321, 347, 316, (SFC 1982)
316L, Inconel
(SFC 1982)
5% RT Ti, Ta (AMC) Zr (AMC)
100 Ti, Ti-Pd, Zr (AMC)
Ta (AM C)
10% 20 Ti, Ta (AMC) SS 316 (ASS) SS 302, 304,
410, 430, (ASS)
Zr (AMC)
65.5 FGRP (red)
FGRP (silver)
(AOS 1982)
93 FGRP (Poly-
thread) (AOS
1982)
96 FGRP (green)
FGRP (Chemline)
(AOS 1982)
Ta (AMC)
10-100% 24-100 Glass (CDS 1967)
24-52 Wood (CDS 1967)
22

(Cont'd)
Chemical
Not
.~--------.
5. Others 84- Concrete (CDS

(Cont'd) 1967)
100 Wood (CDS
1967)
20% 20 Ti, Ta (AMC) Zr (AMC)
Ta (AM C)
30% 20 Ti, Ta (AMC) Zr (AM C)
100 Ti, Ti-Pd, Zr (AM C)
Ta (AMC)
4-0% 65.5 FGRP (red)
FGRP (silver)
(AOS 1982)
93 FGRP (Poly-
thread (AOS 1982)
96 FGRP (green)
FGRP (Chemline)
(AOS 1982)
Satu- 21 PVDF (TPS 1978)
rated PVC (TPS 1978)
60
"Soft", Natural
Rubbers and
Plastics (HFC
1965)
65 Alloy C, Phenolic
Resin
66 PP (TPS 1978)
71 PE, Polystyrene,
Polyvinyl (HFC
1965)
80 PP, NBR, IIR, PE, POM uPVC,NR
EPDM, CR, (GF) (GF)
FPM, CSM
(GF)
23

(Cont'd)
Chemical
Not
5. Others 82 "Hard" Linings PP (TPS 1978)

(Cont'd) of Rubbers and
Plastics (HFC
1965)
85 CPVC (Tps 1978)
Glass, Chemical
Porcelain,
Chemical Stone-
ware, Acid Brick
(HFC 1965)
Satu- 100 NBR, IIR, PP (GF) uPVC, PE,
rated EPDM, CR, POM, NR (GF)
FPM, CSM (GF)
not not Glass/Silicates,
stated stated Carbon Impregnated
with Furan,
Carbon Impregnated
with Phenolic,
TFE, FEP, Furan Resin,
Epoxy Resin
(CE 1980b)
100% 21 IIR, Gatron, CSM, Polyester CS, SS 304, 316
(CE 1980a) elastomer, FPM AI, Brass (CE
(CE 1980a) 1980a)
* This material has been given a lower rating in a similar application by another
reference.
TABLE 6 MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION
Abbrev ia tion Material of Construction

--------
ABS Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene
Alloy 20
Alloy C
Aluminum
Cast Iron, High Silicon
24
TABLE 6 MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION (Cont'd)
Abbreviation Material of Construction
Chlorinated Polyether
CPVC Chlorinated Polyvinyl Chloride
CR Polychloroprene (Neoprene)
CS Carbon Steel
CSM Chlorosulphonated Polyethylene (Hypalon)
Concrete
Epoxy Resin
EPDM Ethylene Propylene Rubber
Fibreglass Reinforced Plastic
FPM Fluorine Rubber (Viton)
Furan Resin
Glass
GRP Glass Reinforced Vinyl Ester
Hastelloy B-2
Inconel
IIR Isobutylene/Isoprene (Butyl) Rubber
Monel
NBR Acrylonitrile/Butadiene Rubber (Nitrile,
Buna N)
NR Natural Rubber
Nickel
Phenolic
PE Polyethylene
POM Polyoxymethylene
PP Pol ypropy lene
Porcelain
PTFE Polytetrafluoroethy lene (Teflon)
PVC (followed by grade, if any) Polyvinyl Chloride
PVDC Polyvinylidene Chloride
PVDF Polyvinyledene Fluoride
Polystyrene
SBR Styrene/Butadiene (GR-5, Buna S) Rubber
25
TABLE 6 MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION (Cont'd)
Abbreviation Material of Construction
55 (followed by grade) Stainless Steel

Ta Tantalum
Ti Titanium
Ti-Pd Titanium-paladium
uPVC Unplasticized Polyvinyl Chloride
Wood (Plywood, Fir)
Zr Zirconium
26
5 CONTAMINANT TRANSPORT
5.1 General Summary
Ferric chloride is sometimes transported as a solid, or as aqueous solutions of

29 to 46 percent concentration in railway tank cars or in tank trucks. When spilled in
water, all forms will dissolve rapidly. When spilled on soil, the liquid forms will spread on
the surface and penetrate into the soil at a rate dependent on the soil type and its water
content. Movement of ferric chloride toward the water table may be an environmental
problem. Because ferric chloride is essentially nonvolatile, dispersion in air is not a
problem.
Factors considered for the transport of a ferric chloride spill in water and soil
include the following:
_________----l[Rate of discharge
Leak or spill _
Percent remammg
Contaminant
Transport - -
Water - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Diffusion and downstream
concentration
S O i l - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Depth and time of penetration
It is important to note that, because of the approximate nature of the contaminant

transport calculations, the approach adopted throughout has been to use conservative
estimates of critical parameters so that predictions are approaching worst case scenarios
for each medium. This may require that the assumptions made for each medium be quite
different and to some extent inconsistent. As well as producing worst case scenarios, this
approach allows comparison of the behaviours of different chemicals under consistent
assumptions.
5.2 Leak Nomograms
5.2.1 Introduction. In solution form, ferric chloride would be transported in largest

quantities by railway tank car. While the capacities of the tank cars vary widely, one
tank car, with a carrying capacity of about 80 000 L, has been chosen throughout the
EnviroTIPS series for development of the leak nomograms.
If the tank car loaded with dilute aqueous solution is punctured on the bottom,
all of the contents will drain out by gravity. The aim of the nomograms is to provide a
27
FIGURE 6 TANK CAR WITH PUNCTURE HOLE IN BOTTOM
simple means to obtain the time history of the conditions in the tank car and the leak rate
of the liquid.
Because of the low volatility of ferric chloride solution and the fact that tank
cars are not pressurized, no leak nomograms have been prepared for vapour release from a
puncture in the top of the tank.
5.2.2 Nomograms.
5.2.2.1 Figure 7: Percent remaining versus time. Figure 7 provides a means of

estimating the percent of liquid remaining in the standard tank car after the time of
puncture for a number of different hole diameters. The hole diameter is actually an
equivalent diameter and can be applied to a noncircular puncture.
The standard tank car (2.75 m <b x 13.4- m long) is assumed to be initially full
(at t=O) with a volume of about 80 000 L of ferric chloride solution. The amount
remaining at any time (t) is not only a function of the discharge rate over time, but also
of the size and shape of the tank car.
5.2.2.2 Figure 8: Discharge rate versus time. Figure 8 provides a means of

estimating the instantaneous discharge rate (Lis) at any time (t) after the time of
puncture for a number of equivalent hole diameters. The nomogram is only applicable to
the standard tank car size with an initial volume of 80 000 L.
5.2.3 Sample Calculations.
i) Problem A
The standard tank car (80 000 L capacity) filled with a 4-5 percent aqueous solution
of ferric chloride has been punctured on the bottom. The equivalent diameter of the
hole is 150 mm. What percent of the initial 80 000 L remains after 10 minutes?
28 FIGURE 7
PERCENT REMAIN ING
FERRIC CHLORIDE
VS TIME
0.0
c:::
c:::
ro
E
Q)
0::
........
c:::
Q)
u
10!-~~~~~~~-r~~~~--~-+--~~~~-lJ-L1-
°l~----~--~--~~~~-L~----~--~--~~-L~LlJ
10 100
Time from Puncture (min.)
FIGU RE 8
DISCHARGE RATE
FERRIC CHLORIDE VS TIME
1,000
~oo mm
I I I I I
: I I T II I
~50 rT)m Equivalent Diameter of Puncture
~400mm
..... -~50 mIT)
10 0
300 mm
~ """,,250 mm-~200 mm
-
70 ...... ••........•••• ••....... ...... .... ... . .. ... ..~t:::::;[~O mm
----
'"
U')
..........
--I
r-.....~OO mm
Q)
0.0
~
ro
10 50 mm
..r:::
0
u
U')
-
1 ,It
1 5 10
50 100
Time from Puncture (min.)
29
Solution to Problem A
Use Figure 7
With t=lO min and d=150 mm, the amount remaining is about 36 percent, or
28 800 L
ii) Problem B
With the same conditions as Problem A, what is the instantaneous discharge rate
from the tank 10 minutes after the accident?
Solution to Problem B
Use Figure 8
With t=lO min and d=150 mm, the instantaneous discharge rate (q) = 70 Lis
5.3 Dispersion in the Air
Because ferric chloride is nonvolatile in foreseeable spill circumstances, there

is no significant potential for dispersion in the air.
5.4 Behaviour in Water
5.4.1 Introduction. When spilled on a water surface, ferric chloride solid or solution
will dissolve or mix rapidly. This mixing can generally be described by classical diffusion
equations with one or more diffusion coefficients. In rivers, the principal mixing agent is
stream turbulence, while in calm water mixing takes place by molecular diffusion.
As mentioned in Section 2 of this manual, the ferric ion in aqueous solution
will tend to hydrolyze in all except the most acid water. Hydroxyl ions often have a
stronger affinity for ferric ion than do organic or inorganic bases. Ferric ions also have a
relatively strong tendency to form complexes in aqueous solution. It will, for example,
react with orthophosphate to form the soluble complex FeHP04+, which under acid
conditions will precipitate as FeP04. In neutral or slightly basic water, the precipitate is
a metastable compound probably containing both P04-3 and OH- ions in variable
proportions depending on the pH. The hydrolysis of ferric ion forms the mononuclear
species (Fe(H2 0 )5 0H )+2 and (Fe(H20)4(OH)2)+ 1. Other species that have been identified
are (Fe(H20)4(OH)2Fe(H20)4)+4, (Fe3(H20)4(OH)4)+5 and (Fe(H20)2(OH)4)-. In the pH
range 5 to 8, ferric ion cannot remain in solution, but only in suspension or as complexes.
Generally, the hydrolysis of ferric ion will lead to the formation of hydrous ferric oxide,
FeO(OH), as a suspension. Once spilled into a water system, the form of the ion will
depend upon the water conditions and will almost certainly lower the pH of the immediate
30
surrounding water (Cotton 1972; Hesse 1972; Water Analysis 1982). The remainder of
Section 5.4 in no way attempts to take into account the ultimate form of the spilled ferric
ion or the final condition of the water, e.g., pH, resulting from interactions of ferric ion
with water.
To estimate the pollutant concentration in a river downstream from a spill,
the turbulent diffusion has been modelled. The model employed is strictly applicable to
neutrally buoyant liquids and solids that dissolve in water. As ferric chloride is denser
than water, initially the maximum concentration would be expected near the bottom. As
mixing takes place, the concentration becomes uniform.
The one-dimensional model uses an idealized rectangular channel section and
assumes a uniform concentration of the pollutant throughout the section. Obviously, this
applies only to points sufficiently far downstream of the spill where mixing and dilution
have distributed the pollutant across the entire river channel. The model is applicable to
rivers where the ratio of width to depth is less than 100 (W /d < 100) and assumes a
Manning's roughness coefficient of 0.03. Details of the model are outlined in the
Introduction Manual.
No modelling has been carried out for molecular diffusion in still water.
Rather, nomograms have been prepared to define the hazard zone and the average
concentration within the hazard zone as a function of spill size, but independent of time.
5.4.2 Nomograms. The following nomograms are presented to calculate pollutant

concentrations in non-tidal rivers and in lakes (still water).
Non-tidal Rivers
Figure 10: distance versus time for a range of average stream velocities
Figure 11: hydraulic radius versus channel width for a range of stream depths
Figure 12: diffusion coefficient versus hydraulic radius for a range of average
stream velocities
Figure 13: alpha* versus diffusion coefficient for various time intervals
Figure 14: alpha versus delta * for a range of spill sizes
Figure 15: maximum concentration versus delta for a range of river cross-sectional
areas
---'--- .---
* Alpha and delta are conversion factors only and are of no significance other than to
facilitate calculation of downstream concentration.
31
Lakes or Still Water Bodies
Figure 16: volume versus radius for the hazard zone for a range of lake depths
Figure 17: average concentration versus volume for the hazard zone for a range of
spill sizes
The flow chart in Figure 9 outlines the steps required to estimate downstream
concentration after a spill and identifies the nomograms to be used. These nomograms
(Figures 10 through 17) are described in the following sub-sections.
5.4.2.1 Nomograms for non-tidal rivers.
Figure 10: Distance versus time. Figure 10 presents a simple relationship

between average stream velocity, time, and distance. Using an estimate of average
stream velocity (U), the time (t) to reach any point of interest, at some distance (X)
downstream of the spill, can be readily obtained from Figure 10.
Figure 11: Hydraulic radius versus channel width. The model used to estimate
downstream pollutant concentration is based on an idealized rectangular channel of width
(W) and depth (d). The hydraulic radius (r) for the channel is required in order to estimate
the turbulent diffusion coefficient (E). The hydraulic radius (r) is defined as the stream
cross-sectional area (A) divided by the wetted perimeter (P). Figure 11 is a nomogram for
computation of the hydraulic radius (r) using the width and depth of the idealized river
cross-section.
Figure 12: Diffusion coefficient versus hydraulic radius. Figure 12 permits

calculation of the longitudinal diffusion coefficient (E), knowing the hydraulic radius (r)
from Figure 11 and the average stream velocity (U).
Figure 1.3: Alpha versus diffusion coefficient. Figure 13 is used to estimate a

conversion factor alpha (a), which is a function of the diffusion coefficient (E) and the
time (t) to reach the point of interest downstream of the spill.
Figure 14: Alpha versus delta. A second conversion factor, delta (t.), must be
estimated from Figure 14 to allow determination of the pollutant concentration at the
point of interest. Delta (t.) is a function of alpha (a) and the spill size.
Figure 15: Maximum concentration versus delta. Figure 15 represents the

final step for calculation of the maximum downstream pollutant concentration (C) at the
point of interest. Using the factor delta (t.) and knowing the stream cross-sectional area
(A), the concentration (C) is readily obtained from the nomogram. The value obtained
32 FIGURE 9
FERRIC CHLORIDE FLOW CHART TO DETERMINE POLLUTANT

CONCENTRATION IN NON·TIDAL RIVERS
SPILL
DEFINE PARAMETERS Step 1: Observed or Estimated

STREAM WIDTH (W) W= m
STREAM DEPTH (d) d= m
AVERAGE VELOCITY (U) U= m/s
SPILL MASS MASS == tonnes
DOWNSTREAM DISTANCE (X)
X= m
CALCULATE TIME (t) TO Step 2: Use Figure 10

REACH POINT OF INTEREST t = minutes
CALCULATE HYDRAULIC Step 3: Use Figure 11

RADIUS (r) OF CHANNEL r = m
CALCULATE LONGITUDINAL Step 4: Use Figure 12

DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT (E) E= m2 /s
I
CALCULATE ALPHA (a) Step 5: Use Figure 13
AT TIME (t) a= _ _ __
CALCULATE DELTA (L1) Step 6: Use Figure 14

FOR SPILL MASS L1= _ _ __
Step 7: Compute stream cross-section al

COMPUTE A = W x d
Area (A)
A =Wx d m2
CALCULATE MAXIMUM CONCENTRATION (C) Step 8: Use Figure 15

C= ppm
FOR STREAM CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA (A) ----
33 FIGURE 10
FERRIC CHLORIDE TIME vs DISTANCE
100 000 I -'

~ A
I.
\~ / ./ ,,~
~~ / .~ / II
10 000 '~' ,,~~
IV'
~\:) ~ ~V /1
~
~<$:- ~ ~ " l/~
I
" .L
If' ~
S~ / / A ~/ / / I
~
~~,,~<0 L~/ I "/ /.V 'I ~~
~ Z I"
~If~~/ I ,,/.~V
1 000
" '1) "~r " ""
~". ~.~ .J /A
" ,,')0:;' ~ /
".
E ~./
---
/ ~~/" ~V ~ ~
".
Q)
E
I-- ,,~~
0 V / ,,'"/. K)v
100
83 ... ··· ...... .....;- .. . . ..... ;. • • • a .~
~
.. ,., . / . /
,~"" yJI'. I~.a
,,-:
~/ A /
If' ~
/ ~ / / if "/
/ ,.~ ~'I ~ / ~ ~· ~ I
,.~ ,.~
" 0
~
'// I ~ l.'••
10
,.,. , ,
,
1 '1 1 1 '1 1
./ ~ ./ If' •
I ./ / " ·:•
./ If'
, /
/ '~V ~/ ~/V "
~ ~
~ I~ ••
/ I ·•
1
If'~
10
0 V 'I 'LVj v 100
~
1 000
··:•
·
:10 000
I
100 000 1 000 000
(0.1 km) ioo
km) (l 000 km)
5 km
Distance, X (m)
34 FIGURE 11
HYDRAULIC RADIUS VS
FERRIC CHLORIDE CHANNEL WIDTH
100
--- - - I- +--
U ~\I\\ 50
\)e~~I"""""""'-
S\\e?>~ 30
,, ~
j.o~
------....- 20
~~
~ ~j...~
~ 1--"'"
10 ../ . I I--"
~
10
~ ....
'"
1/
l....ooo""
~ 4.2 ~ L , ... .--

... 5.0
V.- ~
-
0:::
3.0
~............. ~
i-""'" 2.0
~
1.0
II
1.0
0.1
10
,
:j
50
100 1 000 10 000
Chann el Width, W (m)
35 FIGU RE 12
DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT
FERRIC CHLORIDE VS HYDRAULIC RADIUS
1 000 .-----r---.-----,---,-,·--·---L----+--+---+-+--H-+-t----;;;;;P~-~--___j
.--
-- p?'-- -:7
I
--- en
...........
N
E
L..J...J
.......
c:
(1) 10
-
u
u
( 1)
0
c::
0
en
~
'+-
'+-
Cl
4.2
Hydraulic Radius, r (m)
36 FIGU RE 13
FERRIC CHLORIDE ALPHA vs DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT
100 000
000/
,,0
ooo~
'" """'6
~ '"
io" .... 1-' I-'~
000
~
V ~
~
.., "" ,
10 000 ./ I-' " 0
6°
.- .- -L
'..iII'r
\ "i\\\~ """ 100""'"

~
t' ,- ...... ~
-\\~~"~~ ~ io'" ..", ......... ~
~
~OO/ -r-
'L L~ ,- ./ ~ ~ ./~
, ,.... I-' ~ ~
~
".
,-~ / i...."" ~
".
"'p'"
2 000 -c ... 100""'"
~
,....
~~~ ~ ·
i-"'~ I-'~Ioo""'"
~
~ .- i...."" ·• ~/
v
i-"'~ ~
1 000 ......... ~ ~
~
I-' 0 V ~~ i-"" I-'
,,-..-
", "/
~
~~
~
~
........
.",
~""
..-
./
~
""'" ~
~ .-.L"
./'
~".
-
.........
",.
"
"..
...
··
·••
ro
..s:::::
. /", J' ~
,.... ... ~ ./ , ~
... ~ ./
=
<x:: / i-"""'"
~
,.... ~I-' / , ,...,- ~
,....
,-'-
1-''''
··•
~
~ ~
0 ~ ,.... i-'"
~
",,'"
/ ·•
100
..- '" ·
" "" i""" "'"
l.,,;"""
",
~
. / ' .........
"..
./
10 I
0.1 1.0 10 1 000
Diffusion Coefficient, E (m2js)
37 FIGURE 14
FERRIC CHLORIDE ALPHA vs DELTA
10000
, ,.
" " " ""
,
I"- ~ ~
~
"'
'" "' '" "'," "
I"-
~ "' "" I\.. ~
, ~" ,
"'-
~ '"
" " " ~~ '"
~
~ ~ ~ ~
'"'
"'- ",
"
~
~
~~~~ 1'~70o ~
~ ~
7 ~"& ,70
0 0 ,~?O
1 000
""-
~
, "" 0
~
....
' \00 00
o
"-
"-
~O
" "
~O ~O
"
'""
,
IIiIo.. I' "- "
"' .... "'r\I'"
~ ~ ~ "' "-" "" "I' "'- " "
~
"- '""' "" '"~"- '"'" "-

1'-. I\i.
~
~ "-
~' " ~
~
~ ~~ r\. '
" ~~ ~
~
~
I"'I~
1'..'"'- ,,'""- " ~
, ~
~ ~ re
U\~~&
7~~~ ~~ ~~
~~
~~
I"
~~
"- ~I'
~
2 100 ~ ~ !\.
~
~ " " , ,
, .....
Q.)
"-
Cl
" .... ~
".... ~ " r\. "" "
"",
I"lIo
'",
r----.~ ,
:
I'-
" "'" "
" I\. ~ I\,
f--~.~
~~
~ I" I' I"- ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~
," ",
....
,
tP.. "'III", ~ ~ ~ 1'-
{>~ ....
'0' .... '" r\...' " "~ l' ~,
l'
~~
"'
l'\..' '- "- ~ ~
i'~ '"
~ ,
~
'\ "i'~ ~ ~ \ I'~
~" '\ ~
~~ ,
10
5.5 ...... """" """ "" ... .

.....
......
.....,
~
[~
,
""" 1""\ "~ ""
""III\,.
,,'"
, , "",
....
"-
1\..:
'"
't.
~"
"-
, " ~"'"~!Ii..
"' , ~ ~
"" ,
" , .... "
" I\.. "
.... 1Itt..
I'
....
"-
" ~, r\. i\
':" ~
", ~
I'
~ ~, ....
~ ~
" ~
["'111\
,,~ ~~
~~
l.0
10 100 '"
1 000 1 800 10 000 '" 100 000
Alpha, a
38 FIGURE 15
FERRIC CHLORIDE MAXIMUM CONCENTRATION vs DELTA
10 000 Ii" , II .J , l.J

/' ~ / / " ~ ~ " /' / l~
~ V V ~'f' :./ V ~~ V ./ ~
/
I
/ V l/
~
l/
~
/
V
/ V / V
~ l/
~~~ ~ L iI~ Lk( ~~
;~ -'~~~~<i
~ ~}'S ~'S~~$~
1 000
:yr-~ ~~ ~o/-~~ <-c{S
'\,.
~~r----
)~ / / X V / lA'
~ Cross-sectional Area, A (m~)f'
E
=
= / l/ V / ! / V' / V " V /
./
/
c
- 100 V ~~, ' /V "")1'"~V / )~~/V --I I V
IF ~ ~ ". lJI' ; ~
0
.......
" /' " /' / ./ /' ~
/ V , '" V V
C'O ./ ./ :/ /
.......
~
c
~
V V V V ~
~ ~~ ~
20 / ~ ./ .. . V V / .". / V ~ / V
I ~
Cl.l
'-'
c
0
7' I '"[Z'7 11 1/V I ~V

0
E
:::l
ppm
10 7 ," ,: ., ~
, / /
E ~ ~ ~ I.f ./
x
C'O / / ./ / / ~ /' ./ ~ .-
~
~
/ /; 1I V V .I
~
/ / / ,/ / /:· V V
1.0 V V .I~ //' V ,..Il ''"V
/
~
/
If
'/
~ ;
/
,..
V l/ , I V V~
···
VV V / V ··
0.1 / V
I V
I
~A
0.1 1.0 5.5 10 100 1 000 10 000
Delta, ,1
39
from Figure 15 applies to neutrally buoyant liquids or solids and will vary somewhat for
other pollutants which are heavier or lighter than water.
5.4.2.2 Nomograms for lakes or still water bodies.
Figure 16: Volume versus radius. The spill of a neutrally buoyant liquid in a
lake in the absence of wind and current has been idealized as a cylinder of radius (r) and
length (d), equivalent to the depth of the lake at the point of spill. The volume of water
in the cylinder can be obtained from Figure 16. The radius (r) represents the distance
from the spill to the point of interest.
Figure 17: Average concentration versus volume. For a known volume of

water (within the idealized cylinder of radius (r) and length (d», the average concentration
of pollutant (C) can be obtained from Figure 17 for a known mass of spill. This assumes
the pollutant is spread evenly throughout the cylinder. For pollutants that are more or
less dense than water, the actual concentration at the bottom would be higher or lower,
respectively.
5.4.3 Sample Calculations.
5.4.3.1 Pollutant concentration in non-tidal rivers. A 20 tonne spill of 45 percent

ferric chloride solution has occurred in a river. The stream width is 50 m and the stream
depth is 5 m. The average stream velocity is estimated at 1 m/s. What is the maximum
concentration expected at a water intake located 5 km downstream?
Solution
Step 1: Define parameters
W = 50 m
d=5 m
X = 5000 m
U = 1 mls
spill size = 20 tonnes of 45 percent solution, contains the equivalent of
9 tonnes of ferric chloride
Step 2: Calculate time to reach point of interest
Use Figure 10
With X = 5000 m and U = 1 mis, t = 83 min
I.J.O
FIGURE 16
FERRIC CHLORIDE VOLUME vs RADIUS

10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 8 Area (m2)
10 9 -,
I I
'7
,I Ll
;
I
;
I
I II
J.
I
,I
J.
J r.I
j ~
I T7 j 17 IJ
II I II I{) .. II~
II) J VV IJ~ If ) j
~¥rj/1~ ~ 1
Vo ~
10 8 I I I 'I I
I I I I
.,
II
II
;
I
,;
17 I
II I
J 'I " J I .. 'I
II j , II I II J
M / J 'I I( I) I V
E
>- I )
'I I
~
, / /) , I
~ ~ ~ ~V/JV
I{ 'I
... 1/
10'7
1.5
. . ........~··l
Q)
.... ........ ..... ... .. .

x
E
:::J ~ .~ ", ..
~
0
>-
10 71 I I I
I I I I
II I 7 A 'J I
I II I 'I I
,J I
I I I J " If IJ
I I
I
/1 '/ 7 7,) I ,
'(
~o/ /) J ) If) , 'f

J
If i
~'VI) Vj ~V ~
JJ.~
'I
~~ ~
10 6 II I I I .I rT
I I I I
J. II I II I
.I
I .
'l T I II I
J 'I ; ; ; J.
I)I I Ifl J
'(
,I , I~
" II I I'I I(
j J
, I //) J
j
10 5
10
Jj ~ I j
I(
I
100
~
'1/) / 1 000 10000
Radius, r (m)
41 FIGURE 17
FERRIC CHLORIDE AVERAGE CONCENTRATION vs VOLUME
10000 .....
"- "- .,.
~
"'
" ", ~
~
~
""'
", '"
,
~
~"- " """" "- r\. "

~'" '"' "- ~
f'~~~
~
~'\
I'~ ~
~~ ~
" l\ r\ ' ?'~.~{J

~
1 000 ~
, .,. .,. ,
';;'0
"-, ,
~
"-
"'
~ '" r'-. I'"
~
~ "'
r'-. ~
"\i
1'\ l1li 1'- I\. '"
"- '" r-,~ ~
"- "" r-"
~ f\.. ~
-~
'"'
""~
r-~
~"" ~
~ IY~ "'" ~70
"" ~ 7 ~
--
E
c..
c..
100 .,.
N.?~~~O
"
~ '" "7~~~~
"r\
f'~ Oa~d~Od f' ~ . 0
oS'
0!'ii0 l"!
u
..... ~
.,. ~
.,. ~
c:::::-
"- "- ~
0
.......
"-
I"\.:
~
r'-.
~ ~
~ r'-.
"-
~ '"
~
~
I"" I"
~
, "" '" " , ~
~
ro
.....
.......
"- "-
"- I~
" ~I\.. ,~~
I\.
~
~ "
l'"
~ '"
" l'\.. '" ~ "- ~r- ~ ~ ~"1"- I'll..
c::::: J!I. "- f\
l'\. ~ ~
l1li "-
Q)
~
u
r\:" r\.. l' ~~ ~I\ r-
'"~1'
c:::::
U
0
~.,. ~ r\
,~
f'r--
~l\'" ~ ", ~ L\ ~ "" ~ ~
r-., ~
'" l\ ~ ~
"
Q)
~
b.O
ro
..... 10
,. .,., ,
Q)
:> "-.,. ,.
c:t: "'"- ""
!I!h. .~
~ ~~
~ ~
"'I
"- ."
I~ ~ f"
" r\.. '" l'I ~
~'" !\..
III. ~
~ ~1!Ii ~ .'-
~
~
~
r- r-
r- ~ " !'II.. "' ~
~
~
"- !~'"
"- "- l"
"" ~
~~ ~"- !\. '" "[\ I'
""
,170["\ "" ~"
'11\,.
"'- ~
~" ~
",~~,
~
r-
1.0
,~
~~
~IY"" &1
KO '0l'\ ~
~~
:\""\ , ~~
~
,~ ~ '\
~
0.65 ...... ... . "

•••• --:,a.. ...
~
'\,. '". . . ...."-. ",
~
~
I~ ~
~
~
-~
" I'
.....: • • II •
~ ~ ~ ~
"I\.. 1\..: ~
~
~
~
~
~
'" r\..
"\i
"- ",, "",

!iii
'"' ,"-, ~~ ~,
~""
'""~ ~' "- i'

~
"" \.
~~~~
. '~~ ~~~~ "',
10 7 , 10 9
1.5
Volume, V (m 3)
42
Step 3: Calculate hydraulic radius (r)
Use Figure 11
With W = 50 m and d = 5 m, r = 4.2 m
Step 4: Calculate longitudinal diffusion coefficient (E)
Use Figure 12
With r = 4.2 m and U = 1 mIs, E = 69 m2 /s
Step 5: Calculate alpha (ex)
Use Figure 13
With E = 69 m 2 /s and t = 83 min, ex = 1800
Step 6: Calculate delta U.)
Use Figure 14
With alpha (ex) = 1800 and spill size = 9 tonnes, delta (ll) = 5.5
Step 7: Compute stream cross-sectional area (A)
A = W x d = 50 x5 = 250 m2
Step 8: Calculate maximum concentration (C) at point of interest
Use Figure 15
With II = 5.5 and A = 250 m2, C = 20 ppm
5.4.3.2 A verage pollutant concentration in lakes or still water bodies. A 20 tonne spill
of 45 percent ferric chloride solution has occurred in a lake. The point of interest is
located on the shore approximately 1000 m from the spill. The average depth between the
spill site and the point of interest is 5 m. What is the average concentration which could
be expected?
Solutior
d =5m
r = 1000 m
spill size = 9 tonnes (equivalent)
X = 1000 m
43
Step 2: Determine the volume of water available for dilution or
Use Figure 16
With r = 1000 m, d = 5 m, the volume is approximately 1.5 x 10 7 m 3
Step 3: Determine the average concentration
Use Figure 17
With V = 1.5 x 10 7 m 3 and spill size = 9 tonnes, the average
concentration is 0.65 ppm
5.5 Subsurface Behaviour: Penetration into Soil
5.5.1 Mechanisms. The principles of contaminant transport in soil and their

application to this work are presented in the Introduction Manual. Special considerations
related to the spill of ferric chloride onto soil and its transport downward through the soil
are presented here.
Ferric chloride is shipped as a solid or in solution up to 4-6 percent by weight.
The solutions are miscible with water and, when spilled onto soil, will infiltrate.
However, 4-6 percent by weight ferric chloride is highly viscous and will only infiltrate
slowly. If moisture is present at the time of the spill, either as precipitation or as water
used to flush the site, dilution of the chemical will occur and infiltration will be enhanced.
If, on the other hand, the soil surface is saturated with moisture at the time of the spill,
as might be the case after a rainfall, the spilled chemical will runoff or remain ponded.
If solid ferric chloride is spilled, groundwater and soil contamination should
not be a problem provided that cleanup occurs prior to precipitation or some other form
of water addition.
For this work, the soils have been assumed to be at field capacity. This
si tua tion provides very li ttle interstitial water to dilute the chemical during transport or
to impede its downward movement and thus represents "worst case" analysis.
During transport through the soil, ferric ion can interact with the soil material
and, due to hydrolysis, can contribute to the acidity of a soil. With respect to the latter,
for example, it was shown that some of the replaced acidity in soils was due to the
presence of ferric ion. Experiments to investigate hydrolysis of ferric ion in soils were
carried out using neutral, normal chlorides. The replaced acidity was titrated potentio-
metrically. It was demonstrated that exchangeable ferric ion is unstable, tending to
hydrolyze; the protons produced dissolve the lattice cations. It was also shown that
normally the hydrolysis does not proceed to the stage of hydrous ferric oxide formation.
44
Soluble iron leached through a soil may be precipitated by adsorption on clay

materials or possibly by an increase in pH (possibly at lower depths) which will reduce the
positive charge acquired by the colloidal particles. In the pH range of 5 to 8, ferric ion
cannot remain in solution, but only in suspension or as complexes. For example, the forms
of iron found in natural groundwaters in one investigation were (Fe(H2 0 )6)+3,
(Fe(H20)50H)+2, (Fe(H20)5(OH»+, (Fe(H20)4(OH)2)+ and (Fe(H20)6)+2. Hydrous ferric
oxide may be present in waters of pH greater than 7.
The solubilities of the oxides of iron in the +3 state are low and thus
movement is not as common as in the +2 state. Reduction of ferric ion can be afforded by
the products from the decomposition of organic materials. A more important factor in
the mobilization of iron, however, is the formation of organic complexes or chelates. For
example, leachates of leaves and forest litter are active in the mobilization of iron. Iron
complexes by fulvic acids is mobile whereas iron complexed by humic acids is insoluble.
(Hesse 1972). The movement of ferric ion from a ferric chloride spill may be a complex
phenomenon; no attempt to model this potential process is afforded in this section. It is
expected that some iron will remain in a mobile form for transport downward to the
groundwater table. Upon reaching the groundwater table, the contaminant will continue
to move, now in the direction of groundwater flow. A contaminated plume will be
produced, with dilution and dispersion serving to reduce the concentrations. This is shown
schematically in Figure 18.
5.5.2 Equations Describing Ferric Chloride Movement into Soil. The equations and
assumptions used to describe contaminant movement downward through the unsaturated
soil zone toward the groundwater table have been described in the Introduction Manual.
Transport velocities have been based on Darcy's Law assuming saturated piston flow.
5.5.3 Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity of Ferric Chloride in Soil. The saturated

hydraulic conductivity (K o ), in mis, is given by:
where: k = intrinsic permeability of the soil (m 2 )

p = mass density of the fluid (kg/m3)
]J = absolute viscosity of the fluid (Paos)
g = acceleration due to gravity = 9.81 m/s 2
The fluids involved are 46 and 14.5 percent by weight ferric chloride, and water. The
water calculations represent the extreme as ferric chloride is diluted.
45 FIGURE 18
FERRIC CHLORIDE SCHEMATIC SOIL TRANSPORT
:::::nill::{%~~ _ ·I·.:I:::::::::\:::::::::::::::::::::~:~~::::~:~:~!:~:-:-:-:-:-:-····.....................
~~~~~~~~~~~~:2i~~~~::::.... EIIIIIII 111111111111111' ..... :.:.::::::::::::::::~{:>}}3f.}}}}}~?}~~?:
:::::::::::::::::::::::/:::::::::::::-:-:'. . Con tam in an t PI ume 1111 .. '.:.'.:-:-: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
\\U)//{?«HH)<~\~}::::::::.:.:-.... 1111""""1"1111111111111111111
::::::::::::::::::::::.....: ....... -: .................. ·····:·:-:·:-:·:·:·::::::::::-:-:··m
_
~
111111111111 D······.··:-:·::::::::::::::~~~::
::::::::::::::::::::::.~!~~~~~~~ ..D.f. .F.I.o~.~ .:::::::::::;:;:;:;:::;:;:;::::::-:.:-:....... I
.................................................................................................................................... 11111111 I. ................
....::;::.
...................................................................................................................................................
'.
....... .. . ...............................
.:.:.:.:.: ~:.:.:.:.:.:.: ~:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: -:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:
'
;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
............................................................................................................................................................................................
Soil: Coarse Sand

-Porosity (n) = 0.35
-Intrinsic Permeability (k) = 10- 9 m2
-Field Capacity (0 fc) = 0.075
46
Ferric Chloride
46 percent by Wt. 14.5 percent by Wt.

Water
Property 20°C 20°C
Mass density (p), 1485 1500 1130 1140 998

kg/m 3
Absolute viscosity 15.4x10-3 10.6x10- 3 1.93xlO- 3 1.88x10-3 1.0x10-3
( ].r), Paes
Saturated hydraulic
conductivity (Ko), m/s (0.1x10 7)k (0.14x10 7)k (0.57x107)k (0.6x10 7)k (0.98x10 7)k
-----.---.------.-~-.--.-~-----.---.-----.----.--.-------.--~.-.--.-.----.-.--.-----
5.5.4 Soils. The Introduction Manual describes the three soils selected for this work.
Their relevant properties are:
Soil Type
Coarse Silty Clay

Property Sand Sand Till
-----.---.----
Porosity (n), m 3/m 3 0.35 0.45 0.55
Intrinsic permeability (k), m 2 10-9 10-12 10-15
Field capacity (efC>, m 3/m 3 0.075 0.3 0.45
5.5.5 Penetration Nomograms. Nomograms for the penetration of ferric chloride

into the unsaturated zone above the groundwater table were prepared for each soil. They
present penetration time (t p ) plotted against depth of penetration (B). Because of the
methods and assumptions used, the penetration depth should be considered as a maximum
depth in time tp. A flowchart for the use of the nomogram is presented in Figure 19. The
nomograms are presented as Figures 20, 21 and 22.
The water line on the nomograms represents the maximum penetration of
water at 20°C in time tp. It is a limiting condition as ferric chloride becomes diluted
with water.
5.5.6 Sample Calculation. A 20 tonne spill of 46 percent by weight ferric chloride

solution has occurred on coarse sand. The temperature is 20°C; the spill radius is 8.6 m.
Calculate the depth of penetration 80 minutes after the spill.
47 FIGURE 19
FERRIC CHLORIDE FLOWCHART FOR NOMOGRAM USE
Spill
Identify concentration
Step 1 f 1
Estimate time (tp) Define soil type Estimate soil and

elapsed since spill • coarse sand liquid temperature
• silty san d
e clay till
Step 2
Calculate area of spill (A)
I
Step 3
Obtain penetration depth (8)

in time (tp) from Figure
48
FIGURE 20
FERRIC CHLORIDE PENETRATION IN COARSE SAND
280
240
200
----
c::
E
......0-
c::
0
160 ~"o~<l' ~
'I.-'\:)
......
~ ~,,~'
+-'
(I)
\~
c::
/
(I)
c....
..-
0
OJ
E
f-
120
V? tJ..~ll'\o'
/
R.,\~'
80
V
/
40 /V /
g
LGoe
f eCb, l4.5i7fo, -- feCb, l4.5i7fo, 4
thO, 4°C
H20, 20°C
o
o 2 4 6 8 10 12
Depth of Penetration, B (metres)

49
FIGURE 21
FERRIC CHLORIDE PENETRATION IN SILTY SAND
140
120
100 0'->
~
~
V)
~
:>-.
,,~'
~
"0 ~
~
0-
;p
-+-'
/
80
c::
0
-+-'
~
[7
'-
~"o~OJ'
/
-+-'
Q)
c::
Q)
0~'
-
CL
0
60 9
7
Q)
//
I-
40
/
V
20 /
[/
V
'LO°C ~ f eC\3, \A.5'1o,
feC\3, \A.S'1o~
-
thO, AOC _
o --'--.
- >- H2 0, 20°C
o 2 4 6 8 10 12

50
FIGURE 22
FERRIC CHLORIDE PENETRATION IN CLAY TILL
1 400
1 200
0,",
1 000 ~
~
...--.
(/)
>-.
ro
"'C
......CI..
c:
0
......
800
V
x7 ~
~
,,,;
~~'
't>..~~""
,;,'-.J /
/
ro \~
......
~
Q,)
c:
Q,)
/
-
c....
600
v/ V
0
Q,)
E
I-
400 L
V
200
/ V
V
C\
t e '3, l~.'J~o,
'2.C\oC
:;::::::::--
\-\ 20' ~oC _
\~ 'J~o, ~
t eC\'3' .
H20 , 20°C
I---
o
o .02 .04 .06 .08 .10 .12

51
Solution
Mass spilled = 20 000 kg (20 tonnes)

T = 20°C
r= 8.6 m
Soil = coarse sand
Groundwater table depth (d) = 13 m
Time since spill (t p ) = 80 min
Step 2: Calcula te area of spill
A = TTr2 = 232 m2
Step 3: Estimate depth of penetration (B) at time (t p )
For coarse sand, B = 4.6 m at tp = 80 min

Groundwater table has not been reached in this time
52
6 ENVIRONMENT AL OAT A
6.1 Suggested or Regulated Limits
6.1.1 Water. In Canada, the maximum acceptable concentration of iron in water is

0.3 mg/L. The objective is less than 0.05 mg/L, based on esthetic considerations
(Guidelines/Canadian/Water 1978; Water Management Goals 1978).
In the United States, both drinking water and livestock watering limits of
0.3 ppm iron have been proposed, with chloride limits much higher (350 ppm for irrigation
and 1500 ppm for livestock) (WQC 1971).
6.1.2 Air. Although no specific limit for ferric chloride is given, Ontario limits
ferric oxide concentration to 75 ]Jg/m 3 of air (Ontario E.P. Act 1971).
6.2 Aquatic Toxicity
6.2.1 U.s. Toxicity Rating. No TLm96 has been assigned to ferric chloride (RTECS
1979).
6.2.2 Measured Toxicities.
6.2.2.1 Freshwater toxicity.
Conc. Time Water

(mg/L) (hours) Species Result Conditions Reference
Fish Kill Data
0.6 not stated Goldfish harmful tap OHM-TADS 1981

5 to 10 96 Goldfish lethal laboratory WQCDB-5 1973
bioassay
4-.35 72 Goldfish harmful tap WQC 1963; OHM-
TADS 1981
9 20 Goldfish harmful distilled OHM-TADS 1981
20 14-4- Goldfish harmful tap WQC 1963; OHM-
TADS 1981
100 96 Goldfish safe hard, WQC 1963; OHM-
(FeC13) pH 5.5 TADS1981;
Doudoroff 1953
100 80 min Goldfish fatal( *) soft, Doudoroff 1953
(FeC13) pH 3.4-
100 1.5 Goldfish TLm soft Doudoroff 1953
53
Conc. Time Water

10 96 Goldfish safe very soft, Doudoroff 1953

(FeC1 3) pH 5.0
0.0000166 1200 min Crucian carp survived WQC 1971
N
0.284- N 29 min Crucian carp survived WQC 1971
0.9 not stated Carp toxic pH 5.5 QCW 1976
(as Fe)
1 to 2 not stated Pike, trout lethal QCW 1976
(as Fe)
0.16 N 4-7 min Minnow (Leucisus survived Carpenter 1927
(as FeC13) (59)** phoxinus)
0.125 N 50 min Minnow (Leucisus survived Carpenter 1927
(as FeC13) (63) phoxinus)
(as FeC13) (79.5) phoxinus)
0.05 N 68.5 min Minnow (Leucisus survived Carpenter 1927
(as FeC13) (14-4-) phoxinus)
0.005 N 89.5 min Minnow (Leucisus survived Carpenter 1927
3xl0- 5 M >50 Orizias latipes highest Doudoroff 1953
conc. tole-
rated
1 ppm 10 d Sticklebacks survived pH 5.0 Doudoroff 1953
FeCl3 (Gasterosteus
(as Fe) aculeatus)
1.5 ppm 3d Sticklebacks survived pH 4-.6 Doudoroff 1953
FeC13 (Gasterosteus
(as Fe) aculeatus)
2.0 ppm 2d Sticklebacks survived pH 4-.4- Doudoroff 1953
FeC13 (Gasterosteus
(as Fe) aculeatus)
54
Conc. Time Water

3 ppm 1d Sticklebacks survived pH 4.2 Ooudoroff 1953

FeC13 (Caste rosteus
(as Fe) aculeatus)
7 ppm 6 Sticklebacks survived pH 3.8 Doudoroff 1953
FeC13 (Casterosteus
(as Fe) aculeatus)
20 ppm 3 Sticklebacks survived pH 3.4 Ooudoroff 1953
FeC13 (Caste rosteus
(as Fe) aculeatus)
5 to 10 96 Goldfish lethal lab WQCOB-5 1973
0.6 not stated Goldfish harmful bioassay tap OHM-TAOS 1981
0.9 not stated Carp toxic pH 5.5 QCW 1976
(as Fe)
1 to 2 not stated Pike and trout lethal QCW 1976
(as Fe)
Fish Toxicity Tests
1 240 Stickleback safe tap OHM-TAOS 1981

1.2 144 Stickleback harmful tap CHRIS 1978
6 (as Fe) 24 to 96 Striped bass LC50 static Hughes 1973
finger lings
8 (as Fe) 24 to 96 Striped bass LC100 static OHM-TAOS 1981
finger lings
4 (as Fe) 24 to 96 Striped bass LC50 static Hughes 1973
larvae
6 (as Fe) 48 to 96 Striped bass LC100 static OHM-TAOS 1981
larvae
8 (as Fe) 24 Striped bass LC100 static OHM-TAOS 1981
larvae
74 96 Mosquitofish TLm turbid WQC 1963
270 1.5 Minnow safe OHM-TAOS 1981
540 1.5 Minnow TLm WQC 1963
2700 1 Minnow TLm OHM-TAOS 1981
5400 1 Minnow TLm soft WQC 1963
55
Cone. Time Water

3 not stated Coho salmon no effect static EPA 600/J-79-073

(FeO(OH» on hatch-
ability,
embryonic
develop-
ment or
survivabil-
ity
Microorganisms
36 25 Daphnia magna TLm standard Dowden 1965

(FeCI3) reference
water and
lake
(FeCI3) reference
water and
lake
(FeCI3) (young) reference
water and
lake
116 not stated Cyclops vernalis threshold Lake Erie, WQC 1963
concentra- 20°C
tion
<18 64 Daphnia magna threshold WQC 1963
limit for
immobili-
zation
130 theore- Daphnia magna threshold centrifuged WQC 1971
tic ally limit for Lake Erie
infinite immobili- water
zation
Invertebrates
200 24 Vector snails killed 26°C Gohar 1961

(both B iomorpholaria
alexandrina and
Bulinus truncatus
* Hydrochloric acid in hard water at pH 3.5 is almost as rapidly fatal.

** Values in brackets are for FeS04 under same conditions.
56
6.2.3 Aquatic Studies. Iron salts were found to be most harmful to goldfish
immediately after dissolving in water. Gill blockage (reversible), absorption in the
digestive system, and iron precipitation in the epithelium and renal tubules occur
(WQCDB-5 1973). Toxicity appears to be a function of several other parameters:
hardness, pH, temperature and buffering, but principally acidity (EPA 440/9-75-009).
Ferric chloride is toxic to threespine stickleback in a manner similar to that of
hydrochloric acid solutions of the same pH. This suggests that trivalent iron has a very
low toxicity. The divalent species, on the other hand, can cause problems as it acts as a
reducing agent; when oxidized, it forms hydrous ferric oxide which precipitates as a red-
brown slime. It was also shown that the toxicity of ferric ion to eels and the fish Orizias
Zatipes is similar tl) that of the metals tin, aluminum and nickel, is greater than that of
ferrous ion, and is less than that of the metals mercury, copper, zinc and cadmium.
6.3 Toxicity to Other Biota
6.3.1 Livestock. An acute toxicity ranking of 500 to 999 mg/kg has been assigned to
ferric chloride by determination of the LD50 in mammals (WQCDB-2 1971). The chronic
animal toxicity limit is 1500 ppm (chloride threshold) (OHM-TADS 1981).
6.3.2 Plants. Iron available from plants exists as the ferrous ion (Fe+ 2) and as the
complex ion «Fe(OH)n)(3-n)+. The availability of iron, which exists in more than one
valence state, is affected by the state of oxidation of the soil. Iron toxicity has been
known to occur when soils are flooded, a condition which might place more iron in a
condition that is available for plant uptake (Hesse 1972).
Iron in irrigation waters, however, is not likely to cause plant toxicity
problems because it is not sufficiently soluble in aerated soils at pH levels where plants
grow well (WQC 1972). Chloride is the limiting factor. The chronic plant toxicity limit is
1000 ppm (as chloride) (OHM-TADS 1981).
6.3.3 Insects.
Cone. Time Water

(mg/L) (days) Species Results Conditions Reference
16.0 7 Caddisfly 50% pH 8.1, Warnick 1969

(FeCI3) survived hardness
50*
0.32 96h Mayfly pH 8.2, Warnick 1969
(FeC1 3) hardness
48*
57
Conc. Time Water

(mg/L) (days) Species Results Conditions Reference
------------------
16.0 9 Stone fly 50% pH 7.7, Warnick 1969
(FeCI3) survived hardness
48*
* DO = 8.0 mg/L in all cases
6.4 Degradation
6.4.1 Chemical Degradation. Ferric chloride does not biodegrade. In water

treatment plants, it will contribute to sludge volume accumulation. Inhibition of waste
water sludge digestion has occurred at 500 mg/L, with total inhibition above 1000 mg/L
(Ghosh 1974). Greater than 100 mg/L ferric ion (Fe+ 3) caused significant inhibition of
oxygen uptake (degraded ability of bacteria to utilize oxygen) (PB 276724).
Gasification in a sewage treatment process was not affected by FeCl3 at
<5 ppm but was increasingly retarded by increasing the concentration of FeCl3 up to
20 ppm. This was attributed partly to the acidity caused by hydrolysis of the ferric ion.
It was determined that the numbers of bacteria in fresh solids treated with 10 ppm FeCl3
were greatly reduced. On the other hand, it was noted that the rate and quantity of
oxygen absorbed by fresh solids was independent of the quantity of iron compounds
present. It was also shown that treating fresh solids with FeCl3 increased the rate of
digestion, but lowered the volume of gas produced (Rudolfs 1950).
6.5 Long-term Fate and Effects
Ferric chloride forms an acid solution, ultimately precipitating the red-brown,

gelatinous hydrous oxide (Fe(OH» on dilution (Cotton 1972; Bailar 1973). Phosphates are
also effectively removed as insoluble iron salts (Campbell 1982). An iron-rich sludge on
the bottom may result in continuous release of small amounts of iron, capable of
producing toxic effects with chronic exposure (EPA 440/9-75-009). Marine plants
concentrate iron by a factor of 50 000; marine invertebrates by 20 000; marine fish by
3000; freshwater plants by 5000, invertebrates by 3200; and fish by 300 (Chapman 1968).
58
7 HUMAN HEALTH
There is a limited amount of information in the published literature concerning

the toxicological effects of test animal and human exposures to ferric chloride. Much of
the published information pertaining to the health effects of this chemical deals with its
irritant effects on the eyes and skin, and the consequences of ingestion. No information
was encountered in the literature on the effects of ferric chloride on reproduction, nor its
mutagenicity or carcinogenicity. Little information is available on the effects of chronic
exposures to this chemical.
Ferric chloride was reported in the EPA TSCA inventory in July 1979. The
data summarized here are representative of information found in the literature.
7.1 Recommended Exposure Limits
The exposure standards for ferric chloride are based upon its irritant proper-
ties. Canadian provincial guidelines generally are similar to those of USA-ACGIH unless
indicated otherwise.
Guideline (Time) Origin Recommended Level Reference
Time-weighted Averages (TWA)
TLV® (8 h) USA-ACGIH 1 mg/m 3 (iron salts, TLV 1983

soluble, as Fe)
Short-term Exposure Limits (STEL)
STEL (15 min) USA-ACGIH 2 mg/m 3 (iron salts, TLV 1983

soluble, as Fe)
7.2 Irritation Data
7.2.1 Skin Contact.
Exposure Level
(and Duration) Effects Reference
SPECIES: Human
Solid will burn skin CHRIS 1978

59
Exposure Level
Concentration equi- Prolonged contact with ferric GE 1979

valent to 42° Be chloride solution will cause
skin staining and may cause
dermatitis similar to that caused
by weak acids
Direct contact Anhydrous form is an irritant Hawley 1977;
to skin and tissue Merck 1983
7.2.2 Eye Contact.
Exposure Level
SPECIES: Human
Dust is irritating to eyes. CHRIS 1978

Solid will burn eyes
7.3 Threshold Perception Properties
7.3.1 Odour. Odour Characteristics: Solution in water has slight acid odour
(specifically of hydrochloric acid) (GE 1979).
7.3.2 Taste. Taste Characteristics: Iron taste (AAR 1981).
Parameter Media Concentration Reference
Median Taste distilled water 3.4 ppm QCW 1976

Threshold
Readily Detectable spring water 1.8 mg/L QCW 1976
7.4 Long-term Studies
7.4.1 Inhalation.
Very few data were found with regard to the inhalation of iron compounds, in
general, and none regarding ferric chloride, specifically. It was stated that only ferric
oxide, Fe203, has any industrial risk with very long term chronic inhalation leading to
60
siderosis (a pneumoconiosis due to the inhalation of iron or other metallic particles) (Patty
1981; Kirk-Othmer 1981). It is not probable that a spill situation involving anhydrous
ferric chloride could set up a situation leading to chronic exposure to airborne particles.
The hygroscopic nature of the material would lead to the hydrate formation and clumping.
Acute exposure to airborne ferric chloride, anhydrous or hydrated, would more than likely
produce symptoms similar to those expected from hydrochloric acid aerosol due to
hydrolysis while in solution. Since only limited data were found regarding the toxicity of
ferric chloride, data are also included in this section for other compounds of ferric ion
(Fe+ 3) as well as for the ferrous ion (Fe+ 2) and reduced iron powder. It is felt, in most
cases, that the cation is of primary importance and the anions of lesser importance.
Ferrous compounds are included for comparative purposes.
Iron salts in both the +2 and +3 oxidation states are not exceptionally toxic
when ingested. Humans appear to suffer no harmful effects from drinking natural waters
containing iron. It is known that iron in the +2 oxidation state (ferrous) is generally
absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract more readily than iron in the +3 state (ferric),
presumably because of its greater solubility. A number of factors, including acidity of the
gastric juice, composition of the diet (high phosphate and phytic acid reduce absorption),
vitamin B6, calcium, copper, and others, appear to influence absorption of iron (Patty
1981; Water Analysis 1982).
When iron salts are introduced directly into the bloodstream, they are highly
and instantaneously toxic, particularly the ferric salts. This can be verified by reviewing
the intraperitoneal and intravenous data shown below, and comparing them to ingestion
data (Patty 1981).
The immediate cause of death from inorganic iron compounds in animals is
respiratory failure. Preceding death, the clinical signs are anorexia, oligodipsia, oliguria,
alkalosis, diarrhea, loss of body weight, hypothermia, and alternating irritability and
depression. Autopsy reveals loss of weight in most organs, accompanied by dehydration
when death occurred early and by edema when death was delayed. The dominant
histopathological sign is vascular congestion of the gastrointestinal tract, liver, kidneys,
heart, lungs, brain, spleen, adrenals and hymus gland. Toxic signs begin to disappear in
survivors towards the end of 1 week and completely disappear after 2-4 weeks (Patty
1981).
61
7.4.2 Ingestion.
Exposure Level
SPECIES: Human
60 mg/kg (FeSOtt), adult, TDLO (affects primarily the CNS) Patty 1981
female
200-250 mg/kg (as Fe) Lethal dose Kirk-Othmer 1981
600 mg/kg (FeSOtt), infant TDL8 (affects gastrointestinal Patty 1981
tract
30 g Estimated fatal dose TDB (on-line) 1981
390 mg/kg (FeSOtt), child LDLO Kirk-Othmer 1981
200 mg/kg (FeSOtt), woman LDLO Kirk-Othmer 1981
SPECIES: Rabbit
890 mg/kg (FeCI2*ttH20) LDLO Kirk-Othmer 1981

7 mg/kg LDLO TDB (on-line) 1981
SPECIES: Rat
98.6 g/kg (reduced Fe LD50 Patty 1981

powder)
5 to 0.5 g/kg LD50 CHRIS 1978
3250 mg/kg LD50 Patty 1981
(Fe(N03)3·9H20)
1tt80 mg/kg (FeSOtt) LD50 Patty 1981
900 mg/kg (anhydrous LD 50 (from older literature) Patty 1981
FeCI3)
900 mg/kg (FeCI3·6H20) LDLO OHM-TADS 1981
98tt mg/kg (FeCI2·ttH20) LD50 Kirk-Othmer 1981
319 mg/kg (FeSOtt) LD50 Kirk-Othmer 1981
1989 mg/kg (FeSOtt ·7H20) LDLO Kirk-Othmer 1981
SPECIES: Dog
200 to 800 mg (anhydrous no effect Patty 1981

FeCI2)
1550 mg/kg (ferrocene, LD50 Patty 1981
(C5H5)2Fe)
1520 mg/kg (FeS04 ·7H20) LD50 Kirk-Othmer 1981
62
Exposure Level
1278 mg/kg (only FeCI3) LD50 RTECS 1979

979 mg/kg (FeS04) LD50 Kirk-Othmer 1981
540 mg/kg LD50 TDB (on-line) 1981
440 mg/kg (anhydrous LD50 (from oldei literature) Patty 1981
FeCI3)
400 mg/kg (anhydrous Patty 1981
FeCI3)
SPECIES: Mouse
7.4.3 Intraperitoneal.
Exposure Level
SPECIES: Mouse
335 mg/kg (ferrocene, LD50 Patty 1981

(C2H5}2 Fe )
260 mg/kg (FeCI3e6H20) LD50 Patty 1981
100 mg/kg (FeS04) LD50 Patty 1981
68 mg/kg (anhydrous LD50 Patty 1981
FeCI3)
7.4.4 Intravenous.
Exposure Level
SPECIES: Rabbit
7.2 mg/kg LD50 AAR 1981;

OHM-TAOS 1981
7 mg/kg (anhydrous FeCI3) LDLO RTECS 1979
7 mg/kg (FeCI3) LDLO (from older literature) Patty 1981
63
Exposure Level
SPECIES: Mouse
142 mg/kg (anhydrous LD50 RTECS 1979

FeC13)
49 mg/kg (FeC13) LD50 AAR 1981;
OHM-TAOS 1981
7.4.5 Subcutaneous.
Exposure Level
SPECIES: Mouse
104 000 mg/kg, 13 wk TDLO Patty 1981

(Fe-dextran)
4200 mg/kg, 21 wk TDLO Patty 1981
(ferrous lactate)
(ferrous gluconate)
(FeS0 4)
7.4.6 Carcinogenicity, Teratogenicity, Mutagenicity (Patty 1981). Iron and its

inorganic compounds were screened by subcutaneous injection for tumorigenicity. With
the exception of one fibroma from ferrous sulphate, neither iron nor any of its inorganic
compounds, including hematite (FeO(OH)·xH20), produced any tumours. Ferric oxide was
given by inhalation or by intratracheal route to mice, hamsters and guinea pigs and was
not found to be tumorigenic. Among the organic derivatives, ferrocene (Fe(C5H5)2),
ferritin (iron storage protein), ferric citrate (FeC6H50r3H20), ferric salicylate
(Fe(C6H4(OH)COO)3) and ferric ascorbate (Fe(C6H706)3) did not produce tumours. Fe-
dextran, a complex with a molecular weight of 180 000, resulted in several types of
tumours at the injection site (massive doses). It was later determined that the risk of
malignancy in man was low.
The condition called siderosis in man is now considered to be a benign
pneumoconiosis phenomenon because it does not lead to fibrous proliferation, is of low
order of severity, and usually requires 6 to 10 years of exposure before diagnosable
roentgenographic changes occur. Even though iron ore miners suffer from a higher
percentage of lung cancer than the norm, the carcinogenic effect could not be definitely
blamed on iron oxide. No data were found pertaining to ferric chloride.
7.5 Symptoms of Exposure
General symptoms of exposure found in most information sources have not

been specifically referenced. Only those of a more specific or unusual nature have their
sources indicated. References from ITII (1981) pertain to effects of anhydrous ferric
chloride. References from GE (1979) pertain to 42°Be ferric chloride. References from
AAR (1981) pertain to ferric chloride solution (over 50 percent).
7.5.1 Inhalation of Dust or Solution Vapour.
1. Irritation of nose and throat.

2. Tingling and burning sensation in respiratory tract
3. Coughing.
4. Difficult breathing (AAR 1981).
7.5.2 Ingestion.
1. Sali vation.
2. Burning sensation in mouth and throat.
3. Burning sensation in stomach.
4. Stomach cramps.
5. Nausea and vomiting (GE 1979).
6. Diarrhea.
7. Albuminuria (ITII 1981).
8. Hematuria (ITII 1981).
9. Possible convulsion (Lefevre 1980).
10. Gastric hemorrhage (ITII 1981).
11. Albuminuria and hematuria (ITII 1981).
12. Death.
7.5.3 Skin Contact.
1. Itching.
65
2. Staining of skin (GE 1979).

3. Irritation and burning sensation.
ft. Dermatitis with prolonged exposure (GE 1979).
5. Ulceration and possibly profound necrosis.
7.5.4 Eye Contact.
1. Stinging and burning sensation.

2. Watering of eyes.
3. Inflammation of conjunctiva.
ft. Risk of serious lesions.
7.6 Human Toxicity to Decay or Combustion Products
Under fire/extreme heat conditions, anhydrous ferric chloride may dissociate

to ferrous chloride and chlorine gas:
Similar conditions may hydrolyze ferric chloride solutions to the hydrous ferric oxide,
with the simultaneous evolution of hydrogen chloride fumes (Cotton 1972):
Solid hydrated species may also evolve hydrogen chloride fumes upon heating Uv\erck 1983;
Hawley 1977).
Ferrous chloride thus formed may oxidize and hydrolyze when heated in moist
air, as would be the case in a fire condition. The products would be ferric oxide (Fe203)
and hydrogen chloride (HCn (Merck 1983).
7.6.1 Hydrogen Chloride, Ferrous Chloride and Chlorine. Hydrogen chloride is a

colourless gas with an irritating, pungent odour. It may cause skin burns, bleeding of nose
and gums, and ulceration of the nasal and oral mucosa (Patty 1963). Severe exposures
result in pulmonary edema and laryngeal spasm (Sax 1968). Uninterrupted work in
dangerous concentrations of the gas is unlikely because of its irritating nature. The TL y®
for hydrogen chloride is 5 ppm (7 mg/m 3) (8 h-TW A) (TL Y 1983).
Ferrous chloride at room temperature is a white solid, possibly with a greenish
tint due to the presence of hydrates; it is freely soluble in water. It is a mild irritant.
There is no TLY® specific for ferrous chloride. The TLY® for iron salts, soluble, as Fe, is
1 mg/m 3 (8 h-TWA) and 2 mg/m 3 (STEL) (TLY 1983).
66
Chlorine is a greenish-yellow diatomic gas with a suffocating odour. This gas

is a powerful irritant and can cause fatal pulmonary edema if inhaled. Other symptoms
include respiratory complaints, corrosion of the teeth, inflammation of the mucous
membranes of the nose, and increased susceptibility to tuberculosis in workers chronically
exposed. The TLY® for chlorine is 1 ppm (3 mg/m 3 ) (8 h-TW A) and the STEL is 3 ppm
(9 mg/m 3 ) (TLY 1983).
67
8 CHEMICAL COMPATIBILITY
8.1
vJ
cY'tP
,$0
Ii)v
(;~~V (;tv
(;0
~# {('<: 6
(;~ d~ U $
Ii)
,g 01(;- Q.I()
f/) ~
t$
GENERAL
Heat (hydrated • When heated to Sax 1979;

species or decom posi tion Merck
solutions) form s hydro- 1983
chloric acid
Heat (anhydrous) • Will form C12 Cotton
gas and ultim a- 1972
tely HCl
Water • Sax 1979
SPECIFIC
CHEMICALS
Allyl Chloride • NFPA 1978

Ethylene Oxide • • Bretherick
1979
Potassium • • Very violent NFPA 1978
explosion on
impact
Sodium • • Very violent NFPA 1978
explosion on
impact
Sodium Hypochlo- • • Forms chlorine HMN 1983
rite gas
68
8 CHEMICAL COMPATIBILITY
8.1 Canpatibility of Ferric Chloride with Other Chemicals and Chemical Groups
(Cont'd)
CHEMICAL
GROUPS
Metals • • Prim arily Bretherick

K and Na 1979
Metals (for • Electropositive Bailar 1973
solutions) metals will react
in acidic solution
to liberate
hydrogen
69
9 COUNTERMEASURES
9.1 Recommended Handling Procedures
The following procedures have been derived from a literature review. To

avoid any deviation from the intended meaning, the wording of the original source has
been presented essentially unchanged - in so doing, it is recognized that there may be
some discrepancies between different sources of information. It is recognized that
countermeasures are dependent on the situation, and thus what may appear to be
conflicting information may be in fact correct for different situations. The following
procedures should not be considered as Environment Canada's recommendations.
9.1.1 Fire Concerns. Ferric chloride is a noncombustible material. Under fire

conditions, however, the anhydrous material may dissociate to give ferrous chloride and
chlorine. The former, when heated in moist air, may oxidize and hydrolyze, giving ferric
oxide and hydrogen chloride. Solid hydrated species may also evolve hydrogen chloride
fumes when heated. Ferric chloride aqueous solution, when heated, may hydrolyze to
hydrous ferric oxide with simultaneous evolution of hydrogen chloride fumes (Cotton 1972;
Merck 1983; Hawley 1977; GE 1977; HMIS 1981).
9.1.2 Fire Extinguishing Agents. The fire extinguishing agents generally

recommended for fires where ferric chloride, anhydrous or solution, is in the immediate
fire area are (AAR 1977; DOT 1980; HMIS 1981; TC 1979):
Small fires: dry chemical, C02, water spray or foam

Large fires: water spray, fog or foam
9.1.3 Spill Actions.
9.1.3.1 General. Do not come into contact with spilled material. Stop or reduce
discharge of material if this can be done without risk.
9.1.3.2 Spills on land. When spilled in a solid form, shovel into containers for recovery
or disposal (after appropriate treatment). When spilled in a solution form, contain if
possible and adsorb on sand or other adsorption materials. Neutralization of the acid
solution with concurrent precipitation of hydrous ferric oxide is recommended.
Precipitating agents include 6 M aqueous ammonia (GE 1977) and/or sodium bicarbonate
(NaHC03) (OHM-TAOS 1981).
70
9.1.3.3 Spills in water. A spill of ferric chloride solid or solution into water can be
detrimental to aquatic life by lowering the pH of the water body or by creating a floc of
hydrous ferric oxide due to natural hydrolysis or addition of a neutralizing/precipitating
agent as a result of a cleanup procedure. A general recommended spill action procedure
is to contain the spill if possible. Since removal of soluble iron from a water body may
best be afforded by precipitation of a solid, it is recommended that the water body be
treated with a base to neutralize the acid and convert the iron to the relatively insoluble
hydrous ferric oxide. This can be accomplished by many basic agents, but due to its
buffering action, sodium bicarbonate (NaHC03) is recommended (OHM-TAOS 1981). It is
a buffering agent that will not readily lead to a drastic increase in pH above 7.0 if excess
is added, and it is only moderately toxic to aquatic life (DOT 1976). It is imperative to
note that further treatment may be required after addition of a neutralizing agent.
9.1.4 Cleanup and Treatment.
9.1.4.1 General. Recovered ferric chloride, solid or liquid, can be treated for disposal
by sifting or pouring the material onto a layer of sodium bicarbonate contained in an
impervious holding pond-like area or a large vessel. The solid or slurry should be mixed
thoroughly and then sprayed or covered as completely as possible with 6 M aqueous
ammonia. The latter should be applied until the cloud of ammonium chloride has subsided.
If possible, the mixture should be cooled with iced water or crushed ice during the
addition of aqueous ammonia. It is important to keep added water to a minimum to
facilitate the ultimate disposal process. Any water to be returned to the environment
must be at a pH level acceptable for aquatic life, usually in the 6.0-9.0 range (OHM-TAOS
1981; DOT 1976).
Contaminated water, after treatment with a basic material (sodium bicarbo-
nate, lime (CaO) or other readily accessible/acceptable material), should filtered or
allowed to stand to facilitate gravity separation of the oxide floc. The pH of the water
should be brought within the acceptable range before the water is released to the
environment. The sludge/bottom sediment should be removed for disposal in a proper
waste disposal facility (EPA 600/2-77-227).
9.1.5 Disposal. Waste ferric chloride must never be discharged directly into sewers
or surface waters. Following treatment, either at the spill site or at a waste management
facility, the resultant sludge can be disposed of in a secure landfill. See Sections 9.1.3.3
and 9.1.4.1 for treatment alternatives.
71
9.1.6 Protective Measures. For entry into a situation where the spilled material and
its characteristics are unknown, self-contained breathing apparatus and a totally encapsu-
lated chemical suit should be worn.
If the spilled material is known to be ferric chloride:
Safety goggles and acid resistant clothing should be worn (OHM-TAOS 1981; GE
1977).
Rubber is recommended for gloves (GE 1977).
The following chemical suit materials are recommended for protection against
ferric chloride (EE-20): cloropel, PVC and neoprene (excellent resistance).
Eye wash stations and chemical safety showers should be readily available in areas
of use and spill situations (GE 1977).
9.1.7 Storage Precautions. Ferric chloride solutions are extremely corrosive to

normal construction materials and will attack most metals with the exception of titanium
and tantalum. Piping, containers, etc., for ferric chloride solutions are generally of glass,
rubber or plastic. Floors, walls and equipment that are subject to being splashed with this
solution should be protected with corrosion-resistant paint (GE 1977).
9.2 Specialized Countermeasures Equipment, Materials or Systems
The following items are taken from a previous study (Dillon 1982) and should
not be considered to be the only suitable specialized countermeasures equipment,
materials or systems available. More details on the specifications, performance and
availability of these items can be found in the referenced study.
Treating Agents Hazorb (Sorbent)

Neutralizing/Precipitating Agents Sodium Bicarbonate (NaHC03)
Lime (CaO, CaC03)
Soda Ash (Na2C03)
Calcium Carbonate (CaC03)
72
10 PREVIOUS SPILL EXPERIENCE
This section contains information on previous spill experience which will be

useful to readers in understanding spill response and countermeasures. Only those which
meet the criteria are included, and thus, the number of experiences is not an indication of
the problems or frequency of spillage. As technology in spill control advances, this
section will be updated in future manual revisions to include the most useful information.
10.1 Tank Spill (ECSER 1976)
During routine yard inspection at a chemical facility, a tank containing

approximately 318 000 L of ferric chloride solution began leaking its contents through a
2.5 cm hole. About 14- 000 L of the solution spilled onto the ground before the chemical
itself plugged the hole, 2 hours later.
The spilled material collected in three holding areas located in the yard.
Response crews arrived at the site and began pumping the contained material into a
specially made rubber tank car. Soda ash (Na2C03) was then applied to neutralize the
remaining ferric chloride and contaminated soil. The neutralized soil was disposed of at a
nearby landfill site.
The incident shows that concentrated solutions of ferric chloride may solidify
(through evaporation of water) and thus plug a leak. The incident also illustrates some
cleanup methods.
73
11 ANAL YTICAL METHODS
The general approach adopted for each of the Priority Chemicals was as
follows.
Methods have been documented here for the analysis of samples from air,
water and soil in a normally equipped chemical laboratory remote from the spill site.
Customary sources of standard or recommended analytical methods were consulted, and
outlines are presented for each chemical. These sources included publications of the U.S.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), the American Water Works Association (AWW A), the American
Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), and the American National Standards Institute
(ANSI).
If the standard or recommended methods were judged to be reliable and
specific enough for the analysis of environmental and material samples from spill sites
and if they do not require highly specialized laboratory equipment, no additional methods
were sought. If especially simple, reliable tests (e.g., commonly used industrial methods)
were found, they have been presented as well.
11.1 Quantitative Method for the Detection of Ferric Chloride in Air
11.1.1 Atomic Absorption (NIOSH 1979). The range of concentrations for iron which
may be determined is 21 to 210 ~g/m3 when a 180 L air sample is taken (1.4-5 to 14-.5 ppm
ferric chloride).
A measured volume of air, approximately 180 mL, is drawn through a cassette
filter holder containing a cellulose-ester membrane filter with a 0.8 ~ m pore size and
37 mm diameter, at a flow rate of 1.5 Llmin. The sample and a blank are transferred to
clean 125 mL beakers and 6.0 mL of 10 percent (1.67 M) nitric acid are added. Each
beaker is covered with a watchglass and heated on a hotplate (165°C) in a fume hood until
the sample dissolves and a slightly yellow solution is produced. This will take
approximately 4- hours for most air samples. However, subsequent additions of nitric acid
may be needed to completely ash and destroy high concentrations of organic material and,
under these conditions, longer ashing times will be needed. Once the ashing is complete,
as indicated by a clear solution in the beaker, the watchglass is removed and rinsed with
10 percent nitric acid. The rinsing is placed in the sample beaker. The beakers are then
placed on a 100°C steambath and allowed to go to dryness. Once the sample is dry, the
walls of the beaker are rinsed with 3-5 mL 10 percent nitric acid and reheated for
74
5 minutes at 100°C to solubilize the residue. The sample is then quantitatively

transferred to a 10 mL volumetric flask and diluted to the mark with 10 percent nitric
acid. The 10 mL solution may be analyzed directly for elements of low concentrations or
may be diluted accordingly for higher concentrations.
Standard solutions should match the sample matrix as closely as possible and·
should be run in duplicate. Working standards should be prepared fresh daily. An
oxidizing flame is used with an air-acetylene gas mixture setting the wavelength at
248.3 nm. Blank filters must be analyzed as well, following the same procedure as for the
samples. This procedure is a simple method using a standard Atomic Absorption
instrument and is a method that may be used for many metals. Interferences of
importance include high nickel concentrations and silicon.
11.2 Qualitative Method for the Detection of Ferric Chloride in Air
The sample is collected and extracted as described in Section 11.1.1.

The presence of the ferric ion may be indicated on the addition of 2-3 drops of
6 M hydrochloric acid, followed by about 1 mL of 1 M potassium thiocyanate (KCNS)
solution to a 5 drop sample of solution. The formation of a deep red colour indicates the
presence of ferric ion (Welcher 1955). A light pink colour may be due to a small amount
of iron that has entered the test solution as an impurity from the reagents or glassware
(Welcher 1955; Hogness 1954).
11.3 Quantitative Method for the Detection of Ferric Chloride in Water
11.3.1 Atomic Absorption (ASTM 1979; Water Analysis 1982). Concentrations of 0.15
to 14.5 ppm ferric chloride in water may be determined using this atomic absorption
method.
The dissolved iron may be determined by aspirating the filtered sample
directly into the atomic absorption spectrophotometer. A blank and at least four standard
solutions which bracket the expected iron concentration in the sample are prepared. The
spectrophotometer should be set at 248.3 nm and an air-acetylene flame should be used.
The detection limit is 5 ]J giL.
11.4 Qualitative Method for the Detection of Ferric Chloride in Water
The presence of ferric ion in the water sample may be indicated as follows.
To about 5 drops of sample solution, add 2-3 drops of 6 M hydrochloric acid followed by
about 1 mL of 1 M potassium thiocyanate (KCNS) solution. The presence of ferric ion is
confirmed by the formation of a deep red colour. A light pink colour may be due to a
75
small amount of iron that has entered the test solutJon as an impurity from the reagents
or improper cleaning of the glassware (Hogness 1954).
The presence of chloride can be confirmed by treating a representative portion
(5 mL) of the collected water sample with 2-3 drops of concentrated nitric acid followed
by about 5 drops of 0.1 M silver nitrate (AgN03) solution. The formation of a white
precipitate indicates the presence of chloride ion. This can be confirmed by making the
solution just basic with 6 M aqueous ammonia solution with stirring. The precipitate
should dissolve. Acidifying with nitric acid again should cause the white solid to form
again (Hogness 1954).
11.5 Quantitative Method for the Detection of Ferric Chloride in Soil
11.5.1 Spectrophotometric Method (Hesse 1972). This method is suitable for approxi-
mately 0.05 to 0.25 mg total iron in the aliquot of extract taken for analysis.
A sample containing 0.1 g of oven-dry, 0.15 mm soil, accurately weighed, is
placed into a platinum crucible and moistened with a drop or two of water. Five
millilitres of hydrofluoric acid and 0.5 mL 50 percent perchloric acid are added and the
crucible nearly covered with its lid. The crucible is then heated on a sand-tray at 200°C
until the liquid has evaporated. Any unoxidized organic matter deposited on the upper
part of the crucible or its lid can be oxidized with the flame of a Meker burner.
After cooling, 5 mL of 6 M hydrochloric acid are added and the crucible filled
halfway with water. The crucible is then placed on a hotplate and the contents gently
boiled for 5 minutes. If this treatment does not completely dissolve the solids, the
solution is evaporated to dryness and the acid digestion repeated. The solution is then
transferred to a 100 mL volumetric flask and diluted to volume.
The slightly acidic iron solution is then treated with 1-2 drops of 3 percent
hydrogen peroxide to oxidize to the iron III state. A 10 mL aliquot of a buffer solution is
placed in a 50 mL volumetric flask and diluted to about 30 mL. The buffer solution is
prepared by mixing equal volumes of 1 M acetic acid and 1 M sodium acetate and
adjusting the pH to 4.7 with acetic acid or sodium hydroxide. Five m1llilitres of 4 percent
w Iv aqueous (freshly prepared) Tiron reagent (l,2-dihydroxybenzene-2,5-disulphonic acid
disodium salt) and an aliquot of test solution containing about 0.05-0.25 mg of iron is
added to the buffer solution and diluted to 50 mL. The absorbance is read at 565 nm after
5 minutes.
The standard curve should cover the range 0-10 jl g/mL iron.
76
11.6 Qualitative Method for the Detection of Ferric Chloride in Soil
A small portion of freshly sampled soil is placed in a cavity of white tile and
moistened with dilute (1 M) hydrochloric acid. One drop of 10 percent w/v aqueous
potassium thiocyanate (KeNS) solution is added. The presence of iron (III) is indicated by
a red colour (Hesse 1972).
77
12 REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY
12.1 References
AAR 1977:
Association of American
1977).
AAR 1981: BDM Corporation, The AAR Hazardous Materials Data Base, Prepared for the
Association of American Railroads, Parts I and II, McLean, VA. (May, 1981).
AMC: Corrosion Resistance Chart for Titanium, Zirconium, Tantalum, Astro

Metallurgical Corporation, Wooster, OH. Undated.
AOS 1982: Chemical Resistance Fiber Glass Reinforced Pi in S stems, A.O. Smith-
Inland Inc., Reinforced Plastic Div., Little Rock, AR. April 15, 1982).
ASS: Atlas Steel, Atlas Stainless Steels, Toronto, Ontario. Not dated.
ASTM 1979: American Society for Testing and Materials, Annual Book of ASTM
Standards, Part 31: Water, Philadelphia, PA, DI068-77. (1979).
Bailar 1973: Bailar, J.C., Jr., et al., Comprehensive Inorganic Chemistry, Pergamon
Press, New York. (1973).
Bretherick 1979: Bretherick, L., Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards, Second

Edition, Butterworths, London, England. ( 1979).
Campbell 1982: Campbell, M.E., Glenn, W.M., Profit from Pollution Prevention, A Guide
to Industrial Waste Reduction & Recycling, Pollution Probe Foundation, Toronto, Ontario.
(1982).
Carpenter 1927: Carpenter, K.E., "The Lethal Action of Soluble Metallic Salts on Fishes",
Brit. J. Exp. BioI., Vol. 4, p. 378. (1927).
CBG 1980: Southam Business Publications Ltd., "1981 Chemical Buyers' Guide", Canadian
Chemical Processing, Vol. 64, No.9, Don Mills, Ontario. (December, 1980).
CCR 1978: Department of Industry, Trade and Commerce, Canadian Chemical Register,
Ottawa, Canada. (1978).
CDS 1967: National Association of Corrosion Engineers, Corrosion Data Survey, Houston,
TX. (1967).
CE 1980a: Gallagher, R., "Beat Corrosion with Rubber Hose", Chemical Engineering,
pp. 105-118, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY. (September 8, 1980).
CE 1980b: Kirby, G.N., "How to Select Materials", Chemical Engineering, pp. 86-131,
McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY. (November 3, 1980).
78
CE 1983: Shuker, F.S., "When to Use Refractory Metals and Alloys in the Plant",
Chemical Engineering, pp. 81-84, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY. (May 2,
1983).
Chapman 1968: Chapman, W.H., Fisher, M.L., Pratt, M. W., Concentration Factors of
Chemical Elements in Edible A uatic Or anisms, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory,
Livermore, CA. 30 December 1968 •
CHRIS 1978: U.S. Department of Transportation, Coast Guard, Chemical Hazards

Response Information System (CHRIS), Washington, DC. (1978).
Cotton 1972: Cotton, F .A., Wilkinson, G., Advanced Inorganic Chemistry, Interscience
Publishers, New York, NY. (1972).
CRC 1957: Hodgman, C.D., Weast, R.C., Selby, S.M. (ed.), Handbook of Chemistry and
Physics, 39th Edition, Chemical Rubber Publishing Company, Cleveland, OH. (1957).
CRC 1980: Weast, R.C. (ed.), CRC Handbook of Chemistr Edition,

Chemical Rubber Publishing Company, Cleveland, OH. 1980.
CRC 1982: Weast, R.C. (ed.), CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 63rd Edition,
Chemical Rubber Publishing Company, Cleveland, OH. (1982).
DCRG 1978: Dow Chemical Company, Dow Chemical Resistance Guide for Dow Plastic
Lined Piping Products, Midland, MI. (1978).
Dillon 1982: M.M. Dillon, Surve of Countermeasures S stems for Hazardous Material
Spills, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada. 1982.
Doc. TLV 1981: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH),

Documentation of Threshold Limit Values, Fourth Edition, Cincinnati, OH. (1981).
DOT 1980: "Hazardous Materials", 1980 Emergency Response Guidebook, DOT P 5800.2,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Materials Transportation Bureau, Washington, DC.
(1980).
Doudoroff 1953: Doudoroff, P., Katz, M., "Critical Review of Literature on the Toxicity
of Industrial Wastes and their Components to Fish. II. The Metals and Salts", Sewage and
Industrial Wastes, Vol. 25, No.7, p. 802. (July, 1953).
Dowden 1965: Dowden, B.F., Bennet, H.J., "Toxicity of Selected Chemicals to Certain
Animals", J. Water Pollut. Contr. Fed., Vol. 37, No.9, pp. 1308-1316. (1965).
DPLV 1972: Dow Chemical Company, Dow Plastic Lined Valves, Midland, MI. (1972).
DPPED 1967: DOM-X, DOM-X Plastic Pipe Engineering Data, Toronto, Ontario. (1967).
79
ECSER 1976: Environment Canada, Significant Event Report, "Ferric Chloride", File No.
4462-2!T. (IO October 1976).
EE-20: Buchan, Lawton, Parent Ltd., A Survey of Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus

and Totally-Encapsulated Chemical Protection Suits, Unedited Version. Not dated.
EPA 440/9-75-009: Environmental Protection Agency, Supplement to Development

Document: Hazardous Substances Regulations, Section 311 Federal Water Pollution
Control Act, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water and Standards,
Washington, DC, EPA 440/9-75-009. (November, 1975).
EPA 600/2-77-227:- Huibregtse, K.R., et al., Manual for the Control of Hazardous
Material Spills - Volume One - Spill Assessment and Water Treatment Techniques, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, National Environmental Research Center, Cincinnati,
OH, EPA 600/2-77-227. (November, 1977).
EPA 600/J-79-073: Spehar, R.L., et al., Effects of Pollution on Freshwater Fish, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, MN. (I979).
FC: Pennwalt Corporation, Ferric Chloride, Philadelphia, PA. Not dated.
GE 1977: General Electric Company, Material Safety Data Sheets, Material Safety
Information Services, Schenectady, NY. (October, 1977).
Information Services, Schenectady, NY. (August, 1978).
Information Services, Schenectady, NY. (November, 1979).
GF: GF Plastic Systems Inc., GF Plastic Systems, Santa Ana, CA. Not dated.
Ghosh 1974: Ghosh, S., Conrad, J.R., "Anaerobic Processes", JWPCF, Annual Literature
Review, Vol. 47, No.6. (1974).
Gohar 1961: Gohar, H.A.F., EI-Gindy, H., "Tolerance of Vector Snails of Bitharziasis and
Fasciloisis to Some Chemicals", Proc. Egypt. Acad. Sci., Vol. 16, pp. 37-48. (1961).
GPP: Uniroyal, Guide to Polymer Properties, Uniroyal Inc., Mishawaka, IN. Not dated.
Guidelines/Canadian/Water 1978: Federal-Provincial Working Group on Drinking Water of

the Federal-Provincial Advisory Committee on Environmental and Occupational Health,
Guidelines for Canadian Drinkin Water ualit 1978, Ministry of National Health and
Welfare, Ottawa, Canada. 1978.
Hawley 1977: Hawley, G.G., The Condensed Chemical Dictionary, Ninth Edition, Van
Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, NY. (1977).
Hesse 1972: Hesse, P.R., A Textbook of Soil Chemical Analysis, Chemical PublIshing-Co. -
Inc., New York, NY, pp. 356-358. (1972). , .'
80
HFC 1965: Dow Chemical Company, Handling Ferric Chloride, Midland, MI. (1965).
HIS 1969: Hydraulic Institute, Hydraulic Institute Standards, 12th Edition, New York, NY.
(1969).
HMIS 1981: Department of Defence, Hazardous Materials Information System,

Washington, DC. (1981).
HMN 1983: Hazardous Materials Newsletter. (June 1, 1983).
Hogness 1954: Hogness, T. R., Johnson, W. C., -,,-u....,a:-ll_"t_a_t-;-iv;-:-e-:--,A-:-n-:;:-a-;:l~__a_n_d_C_h_e_m_i_c_al

Equilibrium, Fourth Edition, Holt, Rinebart and Winston Inc., NY.
Hughes 1973: Hughes, J.S., Acute Toxicity of Thirty Chemicals to Striped Bass (Morone
Saxatilis), Presented at the Western Association of State Game and Fish Commissioners,
Salt Lake City, UT. (July, 1973).
ITIl 1981: International Technical Information Institute, Toxic and Hazardous Industrial
Manual for Handlin and Dis osal with Toxicit and Hazard Data,
JANAF 1971: Stull, D.R., Prophet, H., JANAF Thermochemical Tables, Second Edition,
Office of Standard Reference Data, U.S. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC.
(June, 1971).
JSSV 1979: Jenkins Brothers, Jenkins Corrosion Resistant Stainless Steel Valves, New
York, NY. (1979).
Kirk-Othmer 1981: Kirk-Othmer Enc cIo edia of Chemical Technolo ,3rd Edition,
Vols. 13 and 15, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
Lange's Handbook 1979: Dean, J.A. (ed.), Lange's Handbook of Chemistry, 12th Edition,
McGraw Hill Book Company, New York, NY. (1979).
Becker, E.O., First Aid Manual for Chemical

harmaceutical
~~~~-.~-~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~
Chemicals, Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross,
Merck 1976: Windholz, M., Budavari, S., Stroumtsos, L. Y., Fertig, M.N. (ed.), The Merck
Index, Ninth Edition, Merck & Co. Inc., Rahway, NJ. (1976).
Merck 1983: Windholz, M., Budavari, S., Blumetti, R.F., Otterbein, E.S. (ed.), The Merck
Index, Tenth Edition, Merck & Co. Inc., Rahway, NJ. (1983).
MWPP 1978: Rehau, Mechan-O-Joint Water Pressure Pipe and Fittings, Montreal,
Quebec. (1978).
NFP A 1978: National Fire Protection Association, Fire Protection Guide on Hazardous
Materials, Seventh Edition, Boston, MA. (1978).
NIOSH 1979: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Manual of Analytical
Methods, Second Edition, Vol. 5, P & CAM 173, Cincinnati, OH. (August, 1979).
81
OHM-TAOS 1981: Oil and Hazardous Materials Technical Assistance Data System, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Oil and Special Materials Control Division, Office of
Water Program Operations, Washington, DC. (1981).
Ontario E.P. Act 1971: Ontario Ministry of the Environment, "The Environmental
Protection Act, Statutes of Ontario 1971", Chapter 86, as amended; and Regulation 15
(General) as amended. (1971).
Partington 1958: Partington, J.R., General and Inor anic Chemistr for Universit
Students, Third Edition, MacMillan and Company, New York, NY.
Patty 1963: Patty, F.A., Fassett, D.W., Irish, D.O. (ed.), Industrial Hygiene and
Toxicology, Second Revised Edition, Vol. 2, "Toxicology", Interscience Publishers, New
York, NY. (1963).
PB 276724: Effects of Hazardous Materials S ills on Biolo ical Treatment Processes, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 600 2-77-239. 1977).
PC 1972: Personal Communication, Pennwalt of Canada Ltd., Oakville, Ontario. (20

January 1972).
PC 1981: Personal Communication, Diversey, Mississauga, Ontario. (13 November 1981).
Perry 1973: Perry, R.H., Chilton, C.H. (ed.), Chemical Engineer's Handbook, Fifth
Edition, McGraw Hill Book Company, New York, NY. (1973).
QCW 1976: Quality Criteria for Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. (July, 1976).
RTDCR 1974: Regulations for the Transportation of Dangerous Commodities by Rail,

Canadian Transport Commission, published by Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa,
Ontario. (1974).
RTECS 1979: Lewis, R.J., Tatken, R.L., Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical
Substances, 1979, Vols. 1 and 2, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH), Cincinnati, OH. (September, 1980).
Rudolfs 1950: Rudolfs, W., et al., "Review of the Literature on Toxic Materials Affecting
Sewage Treatment Processes, Streams and B.O.D. Determinations", Sewage and Industrial
Wastes, Vol. 22, p. 1157. (September, 1950).
of Industrial Materials, Third Edition, Van

1968).
Sax 1979: Sax, N.I., Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, Fifth Edition, Van
Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY. (1979).
Scott 1979: Scott's Industrial Directory of Ontario Manufacturers, 12th Edition, Penstock
Directories Limited, Oakville, Ontario. (1979).
82
SFC 1982: Corrosion Resistance Chart, Standard Fittings Company, Opelousas, LA.
(June, 1982).
Sienko 1961: Seinko, M.J., Plane, R.A., Chemistry, 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill Book
Company, New York, NY. (1961).
Streeter 1971: Streeter, V.L., Fluid Mechanics, Fifth Edition, McGraw-Hill Book
erous Goods, Supply and Services Canada,

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1~97~9~)~.~-
TCM 1979: General American Transportation Corporation, Tank Car Manual, Chicago, IL.
(May, 1979). .
TDB (on-line) 1981: Toxicity Data Base, Toxicology Information On-Line. Available from
National Library of Medicine, Washington, DC. (1981).
TDGC 1980: Transport Canada, Transportation of Dangerous Goods Code, Vol. 1 (Lists),
Vol. 2, Ottawa, Canada. (June, 1980).
TL V 1983: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, TL V® s Threshold

Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Ph sical A ents in the Workroom Environment
with Intended Changes for 1983-84, Cincinnati, OH. 1983.
TPS 1978: GSR Fluid Handling, Thermoplastic Piping Systems, Sun Valley, CA. (1978).
Ullmann 1975: Ullmanns Encyklopaedie der technischen Chemie, Verlag Chemie,

Weinheim. (I 975).
Warnick 1969: Warnick, S.L., Bell, H.L., The Acute Toxicity of. Some Heavy Metals to
Different Species of Aquatic Insects, Jour. Water Pollution, CONTD. FED., Vol. 41, no. 2,
Part I. (February, 1969).
Water Analysis 1982: Minear, R.A., Keith, L.H. (ed.), Water Analysis, Vol. 1, "Inorganic
Species", Part 1, Academic Press, New York, NY. (1982).
Water Management Goals 1978: Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Water Management
Goals Policies Ob' ectives and 1m lementation Procedures for the Ministr of the
Environment, Toronto, Ontario. November, 1978 •
Welcher 1955: Welcher, F.J., Hahn, R.B., Semimicro Qualitative Analysis, D. Van
Nostrand Co., Inc., Princeton, NJ, p. 436. (1955).
WQC 1963: McKee, J.E., Wolf, H.W., Water ualit Criteria, Second Edition, Resources
Agency of California, State Water Quality Control Board. 1963).
WQC 1971: Water Quality Criteria Data Book - Vol. 3. Effects of Chemicals on Aquatic
Life, Battelle Columbus Laboratories, for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1971).
WQC 1972: National Acacjemy of Sciences, Water Quality Criteria 1972: A Report of the
Committee on Water Quality Criteria, Environmental Studies Board,' National Academy of
SCiences, Washington, DC. (1972).
83
WQCDB-2 1971: Environmental Protection Agency, Water Quality Criteria Data Book:
Inorganic Chemical Pollution of Freshwater, u.s. Environmental Protection Agency,
Water Quality Office, Washington, DC., Vol. 2. (1971).
WQCDB-5 1973: Environmental Protection Agency, Water Quality Criteria Data Book:
Effects of Chemicals on Aquatic Life, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Water
Quality Office, Washington, DC., Vol. 5. (September, 1973).
12.2 Bibliography
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), Documentation of

Threshold Limit Values, Fourth Edition, Cincinnati, OH. (1981).
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, TLV®s Threshold Limit

Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents in the Workroom Environment with
Intended Changes for 1983-84, Cincinnati, Ohio. 11983).
American Society for Testing and Materials, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Part 31:'
Water, Philadelphia, PA, D1068-77. (1979).
Materials in
September 1977).
Astro Metallurgical Corporation, Corrosion Resistance Chart for Titanium, Zirconium,

Tantalum, Wooster, OH. Not dated.
Atlas Steel, Atlas Stainless Steels, Toronto, Ontario. Not dated.
Bailar, J.C., Jr. et al., Comprehensive Inorganic Chemistry, Permagon Press, New York,
NY. (1973).
BDM Corporation, The AAR Hazardous Materials Data Base, Prepared for the Association
of American Railroads, Parts I and II, McLean, VA. (May, 1981).
Bretherick, L., Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards, Second Edition, Butterworths,

London, England. (1979).
Buchan, Lawton, Parent Ltd., A Survey of Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus and

Totally-Encapsulated Chemical Protection Suits, EE-20 Unedited Version. Not dated.
Campbell, M.E., Glenn, W.M., Profit from Pollution Prevention, A Guide to Industrial
Waste Reduction and Recycling, Pollution Probe Foundation, Toronto, Ontario. (1982).
Canadian Transport Commission, Re ulations for the Trans ortation of Dan erous
Commodities by Rail, published by Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. 1974).
Carpenter, K.E., liThe Lethal Action of Soluble Metallic Salts on Fishes", Brit. J. Exp.
Bio!., Vol. 4, p. 378. (1927).
84
Chapman, W.H., Fisher, M.L., Pratt, M. W., Concentration Factors of Chemical Elements
in Edible Aquatic Organisms, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Livermore, CA. (30
December 1968).
Clayton, G.D., Clayton, F.E., Patt 's Industrial H iene and Toxicolo ,3rd Revised
Edition, Vol. 2A, "Toxicology", John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
Cotton, F.A., Wilkinson, G., Advanced Inorganic Chemistry, Interscience Publishers, New
York, NY. (1972).
Dean, J.A. (ed.), Lange's Handbook of Chemistry, 12th Edition, McGraw-Hill Book
Department of Defence, Hazardous Materials Information System, Washington, DC.

(1981).
Department of Industry, Trade and Commerce, Canadian Chemical Register, Ottawa,

Canada. (1978).
M.M. Dillon, Survey of Countermeasures Systems for Hazardous Material Spills,

Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada. (1982).
DOM-X, DOM-X Plastic Pipe Engineering Data, Toronto, Ontario. (1967).
Doudoroff, P., Katz, M., "Critical Review of Literature on the Toxicity of Industrial
Wastes and their Components to Fish. II. The Metals as Salts", Sewage and Industrial
Wastes, Vol. 25, No.7, p. 802. (July, 1953).
Dow Chemical Company, Dow Chemical Resistance Guide for Dow Plastic Lined Piping
Products, Midland, MI. (1978).
Dow Chemical Company, Dow Plastic Lined Valves, Midland, MI. (1972).
Dow Chemical Company, Handling Ferric Chloride, Midland, MI. (1965).
Dowden, B.F., Bennet, H.J., "Toxicity of Selected Chemicals to Certain Animals", J.

Water Pollute Contr. Fed., Vol. 37, No.9, pp. 1308-1316. (1965).
Drake, E., et ai., A Feasibility Study or Response Techniques for Discharges of Hazardous
Chemicals that Dis erse throu h the Water Column, U.S. Department of Transportation,
Washington, DC. July, 1976 •
Supply and Services Canada, TP-1987,
Environment Canada, Significant Event Report, "Ferric Chloride", File No. 4462-2/T. (10
October 1976).
Environmental Protection Agency, Effects of Hazardous Materials Spills on Biological

Treatment Processes, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, PB 276724,
EPA 60072-77-239. (1977).
85
Environmental Protection Agency, Supplement to Development Document: Hazardous

Substances Regulations, Section 311 Federal Water Pollution Control Act, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water and Standards, Washington, DC.
EPA 440/9-75-009. (November, 1975).
Environmental Protection Agency, Water Quality Criteria Data Book: Inorganic Chemical
Pollution of Freshwater, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Water Quality Office,
Washington, DC., Vol. 2. (1971).
Environmental Protection Agency, Water Quality Criteria Data Book: Effects of

Chemicals on Aquatic Life, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Water Quality Office,
Washington, DC., Vol. 5. (September, 1973).
Federal-Provincial Working Group on Drinking Water of the Federal-Provincial Advisory

Committee on Environmental and Occupational Health, Guidelines for Canadian Drinkin
Water Quality 1978, Ministry of National Health and Welfare, Ottawa, Canada. 1978).
Gallagher, R., "Beat Corrosion with Rubber Hose", Chemical Engineering, pp. 105-118,
McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY. (September 8, 1980).
General American Transportation Corporation, Tank Car Manual, Chicago, IL. (May,
1979).
General Electric Company, Materia! Safety Data Sheets, Material Safety Information
Services, Schenectady, NY. (October, 1977).
General Electric Company, Material Safety Data Sheets, Material Safety Information
Services, Schenectady, NY. (August, 1978).
General Electric Company, Material Safety Data Sheets, Material Safety Information
Services, Schenectady, NY. (November, 1979).
GF Plastic Systems Inc., GF Plastic Systems, Santa Ana, California. Not dated.
Ghosh, S., Conrad, J.R., "Anaerobic Processes", JWPCF, Annual Literature Review,
Vol. 7,No. 6. (1974).
Gohar, H.A.F., El-Gindy, H., "Tolerance of Vector Snails of Bitharziasis and Fasciloisis to
Some Chemicals", Proc. Egypt. Acad. Sci., Vol. 16, pp. 37-48. (1961).
GSR Fluid Handling, Thermoplastic Piping Systems, Sun Valley, CA. (1978).
Hawley, G.G., The Condensed Chemical Dictionary, Ninth Edition, Van Nostrand Reinhold
Hazardous Materials Newsletter. (June 1, 1983).
Hesse, P.R., A Textbook of Soil Chemical Analysis, Chemical Publishing Co. Inc., New
York, NY, pp. 356-358. (1972).
Hodgman, C.D., Weast, R.C., Selby, S.M. (ed.), Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 39th
Edition, Chemical Rubber Publishing Co., Cleveland, OH. (1957).
86
Hogness, T.R., Johnson, W.C., ualitative Anal sis and Chemical E uilibrium, Fourth
Edition, Holt, Rinebart and Winston, Inc., New York, NY.
Hughes, J.S., Acute Toxicity of Thirty Chemicals to Striped Bass (Morone Saxatilis),
Presented at the Western Association of State Game and Fish Commissioners, Salt Lake
City, UT. (July, 1973).
Huibregtse, K.R., et al., Manual for the Control of Hazardous Material Spills - Volume
One - Spill Assessment and Water Treatment Techniques, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, National Environmental Research Center, Cincinnati, OH, EPA 600/2-77-227.
(November, 1977).
Hydraulic Institute, Hydraulic Institute Standards, 12th Edition, New York, NY. (1969).
International Technical Information Institute, Toxic and Hazardous Industrial Chemicals

Safety Manual for Handling and Disposal with Toxicity and Hazard Data, Japan. (1981).
Jenkins Brothers, Jenkins Corrosion Resistant Stainless Steel Valves, New York, NY.
( 1979).
Kirby, G.N., "How to Select Materials", Chemical Engineering, pp. 86-131, McGraw-Hill
Book Company, New York, NY. (November 3, 1980).
Chemical Technolo ,3rd Edition, Vols. 13 and 15, John

~~~~~~~~~~-r.l~9~81~)-.----~~~
Lefevre, M.J., Becker, E.O., First Aid Manual for Chemical Accidents - For Use with
Nonpharmaceutical Chemicals, Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross, Inc., Stroudsburg, PA.
(I 980).
and 2, National Institute

(September, 1980).
McKee, J.E., Wolf, H. W., Water ualit Criteria, Second Edition, Resources Agency of
California, State Water Quality Control Board. 1963).
Minear, R.A., Keith, L.H. (ed.), Water Analysis, Vol. 1, "Inorganic Species", Part 1,
Academic Press, New York, NY. (1982).
National Academy of Sciences, Water Quality Criteria 1972: A Report of the Committee
on Water Quality Criteria, Environmental Studies Board, National Academy of Sciences,
Washington, DC. (1972).
National Association of Corrosion Engineers, Corrosion Data Survey, Houston, TX. (1967).
National Fire Protection Association, Fire Protection Guide on Hazardous Materials,

Seventh Edition, Boston, MA. (1978).
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Manual of Analytical Methods,
Second Edition, Vol. 5, P & CAM 173, Cincinnati, OH. (August, 1979).
87
Oil and Hazardous Materials Technical Assistance Data System, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Oil and Special Materials Control Division, Office of Water Program
Operations, Washington, DC. (1981).
Ontario Ministry of the Environment, "The Environmental Protection Act, Statutes of

Ontario 1971", Chapter 86, as amended; and Regulation 15 (General) as amended. (1971).
Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Water Management Goals, Policies, Objectives and
1m lementation Procedures for the Ministr of the Environment, Toronto, Ontario.
November, 1978 .
for Universit Students, Third Edition,
Patty, F.A., Fassett, D.W., Irish, D.D. (ed.), Industrial H iene and Toxicolo ,Second
Revised Edition, Vol. 2, "Toxicology", Interscience Publishers, New York, NY. 1963).
Pennwalt Corporation, Ferric Chloride, Philadelphia, PA. Not dated.
Perry, R.H., Chilton, C.H. (ed.), Chemical Engineer's Handbook, Fifth Edition, McGraw-
Hill Book Company, New York, NY. (1973).
Personal Communication, Pennwalt of Canada Ltd., Oakville, Ontario. (20 January 1972).
Personal Communication, Diversey, Mississauga, Ontario. (13 November 1981).
§uality Criteria for Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
July, 1976).
Rehau, Mechan-O-Joint Water Pressure Pipe and Fittings, Montreal, Quebec. (1978).
Rudolfs, W., et ai., "Review of the Literature on Toxic Materials Affecting Sewage
Treatment Processes, Streams and B.O.D. Determinations", Sewage and Industrial Wastes,
Vol. 22, p. 1157 (September, 1950).
Industrial Materials, Third Edition, Van Nostrand

~~~~~~~~~~19~6~8~).----------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Materials, Fifth Edition, Van Nostrand
Scott's Industrial Director 12th Edition, Penstock Directories

Limited, Oakville, Ontario.
Shuker, F.S., "When to Use Refractory Metals and Alloys in the Plant", Chemical
Engineering, pp. 81-84, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY. (May 2, 1983).
Sienko, M.J., P1eine, R.A., Chemistry, 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New
York, NY. (1961).
A.O. Smith-Inland Inc., Chemical Resistance, Fiber Glass Reinforced Pi in

Reinforced Plastic Div., Little Rock, AR. April 15, 1982 •
88
Southam Business Publications Ltd., "1981 Chemical Buyers' Guide", Canadian Chemical
Processing, Vol. 64, No.9, Don Mills, Ontario. (December, 1980).
Spehar, R.L., et al., Effects of Pollution on Freshwater Fish, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Duluth, MN. (I979).
Standard Fittings Company, Corrosion Resistance Chart, Opelousas, LA. (June, 1982).
Streeter, V.L., Fluid Mechanics, Fifth Edition, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York,
NY. (1971).
Stull, D.R., Prophet, H., JANAF Thermochemical Tables, Second Edition, Office of
Standard Reference Data, U.S. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC. (June,
1971).
Toxicity Data Base, Toxicology Information On-Line. Available from National Library of
Medicine, Washington, DC. (1981).
Transport Canada, Transportation of Dangerous Goods Code, Vol. 1 (Lists), Vol. 2, Ottawa,
Canada. (June, 1980).
Ullmanns Encyklopaedie der technischen Chemie, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim. (1975).
Uniroyal, Guide to Polymer Properties, Uniroyal Inc., Mishawaka, IN. Not dated.
U.S. Department of Transportation, "Hazardous Materials", 1980 Emergency Response

Guidebook, DOT P 5800.2, Materials Transportation Bureau, Washington, DC. U980).
U.S. Department of Transportation, Coast Guard, Chemical Hazards Response Information

System (CHRIS), Washington, DC. (1978).
Water ualit Criteria Data Book - Vol. 3. Effects of Chemicals on Life,

Battelle Columbus Laboratories, for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Weast, R.C. (ed.), CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 60th Edition, Chemical
Rubber Publishing Company, Cleveland, OH. (1980).
Weast, R.C. (ed.), CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 63rd Edition, Chemical
Rubber Publishing Company, Cleveland, OH. (1982).
Welcher, F.J., Hahn, R.B., Semimicro Qualitative Analysis, D. Van Nostrand Co., Inc.,
Princeton, NJ, p. 436. (1955).
Windholz, M., Budavari, S., Blumetti, R.F., Otterbein, E.S. (ed.), The Merck Index, Tenth
Edition, Merck & Co. Inc., Rahway, NJ. (I983).
Windholz, M., Budavari, S., Stroumtsos, L. Y., Fertig, M.N. (ed.), The Merck Index, Ninth
Edition, Merck & Co. Inc., Rahway, NJ. (1976).
EnviroTIPS
Common Abbreviations
BOD biological oxygen demand MMAD mass median aerodynamic

b.p. boiling point diameter
CC closed cup MMD mass median diameter
cm centimetre m.p. mel ting point
CMD count median diameter MW molecular weight
COD chemical oxygen demand N newton
conc. concentration NAS National Academy of Sciences
c.t. critical temperature NfIDA National Fire Protection
eV electron volt Ass0ciation
g gram NIOSH Nat10nal Institute for
ha hectare Occupational Safety and
Hg mercury Hea,lth
IDLH immediately danger0us to Am nan0metre
life amI heal th (i) 0rtho
Imp. gal. Imperial gallon OC 0pen cup
J Joule ~ pa,ra
kg kilogram IDe critica,l pressure
kJ kHojoul,e F>-1EL p>er m~s,s'iliDle exposure level
km kilometre pH measure of acidity/
kPa kilo pas c a.t aolika,l,iIAity
kt kilotorme pp>iD parts pe,r lD,iHion
L litre p,p>,m p>arts per miWon
lb. pound IDs stamiarcrl pressure
LC50 lethal c0nceAtralti]0li\ fifty psi p0unds p>er square inch
LCLO lethal C0I11eel1l'~rail:"]0111 1'0w s sec0Acrl
L050 lethal @'0se fihy STEL st.l0rt-~1;e,rm exp0sure limit
LOLO letlilal @0se It0W STIL short-term i'Aha,lation limit
LEL lower e,x'p>'1'0sif'YIe lii',IiFl~iI: Tc critica.t temp>erature
LFL lower HamliFlcliiDJill,i\ty l;imit TCLO t0~'1c concentration low
m metre 0r meta Te crlec0fil'ilp>0sition temperature
M moi,ar TDLO t0~dc crl0se low
MAC maxi mu m a<:ceptable TLfrFl median tolerance limit
concen,~ra'tiI0A TLV Threshold Limit Value
max maximum Ts standard te mperature
mg milligram TWA time weighted average
MIC maximum immission UEL upper explosive limit
concentration UFL upper flammability limit
min minute or mini mu m VMO volume mean diameter
mm millimetre v/v volume per volume
w/w weight per weight
microgram
micro metre
degrees Baume (density)

En48 10 21 1984 Eng

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

En48 10 21 1984 Eng

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

En48 10 21 1984 Eng

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1+ Environment

Canada ~emlmJiIl~i~jllllmlfifmj Ililim

Environmental and Technical Information for Problem Spills (EnviroTIPS)

ENVIRONMENT AL AND TECHNICAL INFORMA nON FOR PROBLEM SPILLS

Technical Services Branch

© Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1984

LIST OF FIGURES vii

LIST OF TABLES viii

2 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL DATA 3

3 COMMERCE AND PRODUCTION 11

3.1 Grades and Concentrations 11

MATERIAL HANDLING AND COMPATIBILITY 14

4.1 Containers and Transportation Vessels 14

5 CONT AMINANT TRANSPORT 26

5.1 General Summary 26

5.3 DIspersion in the AIr 29

6.i Suggested or Regulated Limits 52

7.1 Recommended Exposure L1.lJuts 58

8.1 Compatibility of Ferric Chloride wlth Other Chemicals

9 COU NTERMEASU RES 69

9.1 Recommended Handling Procedures 69

10 PREVIOUS SPILL EXPERIENCE 72

10.1 Tank Spill 72

11 ANAL YTICAL METHODS 73

11.1 Quantitative Method for the Detection of Ferric Chlonde in Air 73

12 REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY 77

3 VAPOUR PRESSURE vs TEMPERATURE 9

5 TYPICAL DRUM CONTAINER 17

6 TANK CAR WITH PUNCTURE HOLE IN BOTTOM 27

7 PERCENT REMAINING vs TIME 28

8 DISCHARGE RATE vs TIME 28

9 FLOWCHART TO DETERMINE POLLUTANT CONCENTRATION

11 HYDRAULIC RADIUS vs CHANNEL WIDTH 34

12 DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT vs HYDRAULIC RADIUS 35

15 MAXIMUM CONCENTRATION vs DELTA 38

17 AVERAGE CONCENTRATION vs VOLUME 41

18 SCHEMA TIC SOIL TRANSPORT 45

21 PENETRATION IN SILTY SAND 49

22 PENETRATION IN CLAY TILL 50

2 RAIL WAY TANK CAR SPECIFICATIONS 14

3 TANK MOTOR VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS 15

5 COMPATIBILITY WITH MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION 19

FERRIC CHLORIDE (FeCI)

KDENTIFKCA nON NUMBERS

COMMON GRADES & CONCENTRAnONS

Solid: 96 to 99 percent anhydrous ferric chloride

Fire: Not combustible

PHYSICAL PROPERTY DATA

TLV®: 1 mg/m 3 (as Fe)

Emergency Control Procedures in/on

Soil: Construct barriers to contain spill. Remove material by manual or mechanical

2 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL DATA

Physical State Properties

Appearance Brown-black solid (CRC 1980), or an orange-

Specific gravity Solid: 2.898 (25°/4°C) (CRC 1982)

Flammability Noncombustible (CHRIS 1978)

Molecular weight of pure substance 162.21 (eRC 1982)

1 Solutions containing ferric ion are characteristically yellow-brown due to the

In water Anhydrous: 74.4 g/100 mL (DOC),