Psychological Testing
Psychological Testing
Psychological Testing
ECG 20703
NAME MATRICS ID
- INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………3
- THEORETICAL UNDERSTANDING OF
OF PERSONALITY TEST………………………………………………………….6
- CONCLUSION……………………………………………………………………….8
- REFERENCE……………………………………………………………………...…9
INTRODUCTION
There are many types of psychological test. Among them are personality test,
aptitude test, intelligence test, emotional intelligence test, achievement test, attitude
test, neuropsychological test, project test, observation (direct) test and more. (Stiles,
2021) Under this type of psychological test, there are more specific test that are
developed by a certain founder of test. As for this assignment of psychological testing,
I choose to Clifton Strength of personality test.
BACKGROUND OF CLIFTON STRENGTH OF PERSONALITY TEST
This Clifton Strength test is open to everyone. People, for example, can take
the test for their own personal elves. Individuals can utilize the evaluation to uncover
their top abilities and learn more about what distinguishes them. Everything else is for
the students. The assessment is also available for young people in middle school, high
school, and college who wish to learn what they specialise at. Following that are teams
and an organization's leader. The test can help teams function more effectively
together and increase employee engagement. It can also help leaders demonstrate
their duties and better understand how to lead their teams. The final one is for the
organisation. Based on research, there are 500 companies use this assessment or
test to improve the environment and quality in their work place. (Hodges & Harter,
2005)
There is one theory that can be related to the Clifton strength test, which is the
theory of strength development. The early work of Donald Clifton, coauthor of the
Clifton Strengths assessment (Clifton and Anderson 2002), may be traced back more
than fifty years to the beginnings of strengths-development theory. Clifton's early
studies were carried out while he was a professor of educational psychology at the
University of Nebraska. His early research interests included the study of positive and
negative attitudes (Clifton, Hollingsworth, and Hall 1952) as well as the study of
teacher-student relations and student-teacher characteristics (Dodge and Clifton
1956).
Ongoing research will look at how long the talent themes measured by the
StrengthsFinder will last. There is mounting evidence (for example, Judge et al. 1999)
that certain features of a person's personality are predictive over many decades of life.
As a result, researchers anticipate that the themes' stability will be assessed in years
rather than months. Gallup's research team is currently conducting studies to assess
the construct validity, test-retest reliability, and other psychometric aspects of the
Clifton Strengths of Personality Test. (Hodges & Harter, 2005)
STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF CLIFTONSTRENGTH OF PERSONALITY
TEST
Clifton strength Of Personality Test has its own set of pros and cons. One of
the several advantages of this test is that it measures achievement. Hard work can be
encouraged, as can a high level of stamina and a persistent desire for success.
(Johnson, 2021) The second advantage is that being driven to organise while being
flexible for optimal productivity, as well as making an individual disciplined in dealing
with routine, order, and structure, are essential for their appreciation of the
environment. (Johnson, 2021)
Other strength and advantages in this test are makes a person better at
communication by encouraging them to put their thoughts into words and to present
and converse. Aside from that, it helps individuals with boosting self-assurance, which
means that feeling more competent in managing their life, taking chances, and making
wise decisions. This test can also assist individuals in developing their relationships
with other humans, allowing them to become more empathetic and able to connect
with others by imagining themselves in others’ lives or situations. This person can also
spread happiness, with making people excited about what they are planned.
It is also having a cons and weaknesses of the test. As I know, there are 5
criticisms, Chamorro-Premuzic (2016) discusses some of the negative consequences
of using strengths-based assessments and coaching. The first criticism, is “High
performing leaders tend to get better by developing new strengths, not just enhancing
old ones” (Chamorro-Premuzic, 2016). (Johnson, 2021) The other criticism faced in
this test is some may believe that an individual's top strengths are superior to their
other strengths but do not distinguish them from the rest of the population. An
additional criticism is that the strengths-based approach reflects an equal focus on
growing the strengths of less effective employees rather to focusing resources on high-
potential employees, and they also critique that having too much of a strength can be
harmful, even toxic. Finally, the criticism of this exam is that it focuses on the positives
while neglecting the significance and damage caused by people's faults, which is
wishful thinking.
SUGGESTION AND RECOMMENDATION
The recommendation I have to further enhance this test is in terms of the test
rules and regulations. According to the comments I gained from the respondents who
write the feedback of the test in website about this test, the majority of them thought
they did not have time to answer the questions. (Johnson, 2021) As a result, they had
to respond fast because the time provided for one question was only about 20
seconds. As a result, responders were forced to assume that he had an immediate
reaction to this test.
The next recommendation that I can suggest is that through the feedback
obtained from the test website, this test has some limitations from certain aspects. An
example of the limitation found in this test is that someone who wants to find a job that
matches their talents is not encouraged to take this test because this test is more to a
personality test than a career test. This test only suitable for someone who wants to
know about their strength and talent. (Johnson, 2021)
In summary, I believe that this test is appropriate for all persons, whether they
are employees, students, or therapists. A test such as this can be used to determine
a person's skills and talents. Aside from knowing their strengths, individuals can also
develop them and improve and sharpen the skills they already have. This test
additionally boosts an individual's self-esteem to perform well in academics, work, and
other areas. It also enables an individual to develop a strong empathic attitude and so
become a successful person.
As I realized, as a student, I think can take this test as the test have a many
beneficial to me especially as a student. I can increase my Self-Awareness. It assists
me in better understanding my particular abilities and talents, which can boost my self-
awareness and confidence. Next, by recognising my strengths, this test can assist me
in my academic success as a student, allowing me to modify my study methods to line
with my natural skills, potentially enhancing my academic achievement. Furthermore,
I may begin to design my future career plan, which knowing my abilities can assist
influence my job choices, allowing me to choose a sector or profession that matches
my talents and interests.
REFERENCE
Hodges, & Harter. (2005). A Review of the Theory and Research Underlying
the Strengths Quest Program for Students. Educational Horizons, v83, 190–
201. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ685058.pdf
Johnson, J. (2021, July 21). What Is the CliftonStrengths Assessment, and How
Does It Work? https://www.uschamber.com/co/.
https://www.uschamber.com/co/grow/thrive/cliftonstrengths-assessment