Standard Costing
Standard Costing
Standard Costing
Standard Costing
Standard Costing
Introduction
Standard cost is a criterion cost which may be used as a yardstick to measure the
efficiency with which actual cost has been incurred.
Standard Costs are the predetermined costs or the target costs that should be incurred
under efficient operating conditions.
Analysing variances
Types of Standards
2
Standard Costing
Standards will be set for each component of the cost that includes the following:
3. Overheads – setting standards for overheads involves the following two distinct
calculations:
a. Determination of the standard overhead costs,
Once the standard cost is set, the standard cost card (or standard cost sheet) is prepared as
follows:
Direct Materials
Add: Direct Labour
Add: Factory Overheads
= Total Standard cost
3
Standard Costing
Variance Analysis
Variance is the difference between the Actual and the Standard Costs.
Variance Analysis refers to the investigation as to the reasons for deviations in the
financial performance from the standards set by a company in its budget
Analysis conclusion:
if the actual costs > Standard Costs, the variances will be Adverse/unfavorable
if the actual costs < Standard Costs, the variances will be Favorable
Sales price variance = Actual quantity sold × Actual price per unit – Actual quantity sold ×
Standard price per unit
= AQ × (AP – SP)
If the difference calculated is positive, then the actual price (AP) is higher than the standard
price (SP), so the business has achieved a higher sales price than expected, and the variance
is favourable (F). If the difference is negative, then the variance is adverse (A)
4
Standard Costing
Sales Quantity variance = Actual quantity sold × Standard price per unit – Budgeted
quantity sold × Standard price per unit
= SP * (AQ – BQ)
If the difference calculated is positive, then the actual quantity (AQ) is higher than the expected
quantity (SQ), so the business has been able to sell more units, and the variance is favourable
(F). If the difference is negative, then the variance is adverse (A).
Comments
The adverse sales price variance can be a result of a drop in sales price per unit. Although this
could have been due to general competitive or economic conditions and therefore out of the
control of the business, perhaps it was a deliberate attempt to boost sales volume.
Materials price variance = Actual quantity used x Actual price – Actual quantity used ×
Standard price
= AQ × (AP – SP)
Labor price variance = Actual Hours used x Actual wage rate – Actual Hours used ×
Standard Wage Rate
= AH × (AR – SR)
If these price variances are positive, they must be adverse (A), because the actual price
paid must be higher than the standard price.
Materials efficiency variance = Actual quantity used × Standard price – Standard quantity
that would have been used for actual output × Standard price
= (AQ– SQ) × SP
Labor efficiency variance = Actual hours used × Standard wage rate – Standard hours
that would have been used for actual output × Standard wage rate
= (AH– SH) × SR
If the efficiency variances are positive, they must similarly be adverse (A), because the
actual quantity of resource used must be higher than the standard quantity would have
been. Conversely, if the variances are negative, they must be favourable (F).
* Note that the quantities used for these calculations are the quantities of the resource, not the
quantities of output. Similarly, the prices used for these calculations are the prices per unit of the
resource, not the prices per unit of output.
5
Standard Costing
Comments
The adverse materials price variance might be a result of increased prices per kg. It is
possible that this is due to a change of supplier, or to a shortage of supply forcing prices
up.
The favorable materials efficiency variance might suggests that the increased materials
price may be due to a decision to purchase higher quality materials, consequently
resulting in less wastage.
The labor price variance might be favourable which may be the result of hiring lower-
skilled staff, who are cheaper but who take longer to perform the same tasks.
Alternatively, the poor efficiency variance may be the result of mistakes made when
working faster to produce the higher level of output.
The variable overhead efficiency variance might be linked to that for labour as both costs
are based on labour hours.
*Note Fixed costs should not vary with output. Therefore, any difference between the
original budget for fixed costs, and the actual amount of fixed costs, is not due to
changes in output volume.
Fixed Overhead variances are favourable if they are negative, and adverse otherwise.
6
Standard Costing
Advantages Disadvantages
•Management by exception •emphasizing standards may exclude
•promotes economy and efficiency other important objectives
•siplified book-keeping •continuous improvement maybe more
•enhances responsibility accounting important than meeting standards
•acts as a control mechanism •standard costs reports may not be timely
and involves past analysis which may
•facilitates assigning responsibility and
not be relevant in changing scenarios
engages control mechanism on
departments •favourable variances may be
misinterprested and could be a result of
losely set standards
•emphasis on negative may reduce
morale
•invalid assumptions related to
relationship between labor cost and
output can distort results
7
Standard Costing
1. Better Quality which can satisfy customers and competitors might be offering a
deficient product.
2. Innovative product might also be the cause of this
3. Proper utilization of resources
4. Capturing the market in an efficient way and the organization might be taking an
advantage of customer feedback properly
8
Standard Costing
9
Standard Costing
10