Ethics Activity Sheets 2023-1
Ethics Activity Sheets 2023-1
ACTIVITY SCORE
Setting Up
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Setting Up
12
Case Study
13
Setting Up
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Video
TOTAL
Name:
Course/Year/Section: Date Submitted:
Name: Score:
Course/Year/Section: Date:
Directions: Answer the given question based on your existing knowledge about the lesson.
Recall a personal experience in dealing with problems and analyze how they are rooted in
Filipino qualities. In hindsight, recommend how you could have done things differently.
Directions: Watch the given videos by following the links (provided). After watching the videos,
let us find out how well you comprehend the lesson. State the most important facts you
understand from those videos.
Name: Score:
Course/Year/Section: Date:
Directions: Read the following statements carefully. Identify what is being described in the
statement and write your answers in the space provided before the number.
1. What is ethics?
a. A branch of philosophy that explores the concepts of right and wrong
b. A moral code enforced by authoritative figures
c. Guidelines or criteria that are not directly related to moral judgments
d. Personal beliefs and values that determine acceptable and unacceptable
behaviors
4. Which term refers to guidelines or criteria that are not directly related to moral
judgments?
a. Moral standards
b. Non-moral standards
c. Aesthetics
d. Laws
8. Which term is associated with moral standards and not non-moral standards?
a. Guilt
b. Aesthetics
c. Laws
d. Technical standards
Name: Score:
Course/Year/Section: Date:
Directions: Answer the given question based on your existing knowledge about the lesson.
Select two of the following subjects and outline four arguments, including one in support and
one against each. In a single paragraph, express your viewpoint on the chosen topics.
Name: Score:
Course/Year/Section: Date:
Directions: Present real-life examples or case studies that illustrate each of the three dilemma
levels. These examples can be drawn from either current events, historical contexts, or your
own experiences.
Name: Score:
Course/Year/Section: Date:
Directions: Read the following statements carefully. Identify what is being described in the
statement and write your answers in the space provided before the number.
1. When faced with a moral dilemma, an agent may be forced to choose between two
equally weighty alternatives that have:
a) Only positive consequences.
b) Only negative consequences.
c) Both positive and negative consequences.
d) No consequences.
2. What can happen if an agent chooses not to take action in a moral dilemma?
a) They will be praised for their inaction.
b) They will face no consequences.
c) It can lead to greater harm or loss for themselves or others.
d) It will result in moral success.
6. What ethical questions can emerge in the case of organ transplants discussed in the
text?
a) Autonomy and definition of life and death.
b) Societal norms and cultural beliefs.
c) Personal advocates and education.
d) Structural paradigms and organizational conflicts.
8. Which ethical conflict arises when cultural practices or beliefs clash with universal ethical
standards?
a) Cultural relativism vs. universal ethics.
b) Individual autonomy vs. paternalism.
c) Privacy vs. transparency.
d) Truth vs. loyalty.
10. Which branch of ethics explores different ethical theories such as consequentialism,
deontology, and virtue ethics?
a) Normative ethics
b) Metaethics
c) Applied ethics
d) Descriptive ethics
Name: Score:
Course/Year/Section: Date:
Directions: Read the following statements carefully. Identify what is being described in the
statement and write your answers in the space provided before the number.
4. Which of the following is NOT one of the four principles proposed by Thomas
Beauchamp and James Childress in normative ethics?
a) Respect for autonomy
b) Beneficence
c) Non-maleficence
d) Justice
a) The belief that there are universal moral guidelines for all cultures.
b) The belief that cultural values and practices determine what is right or wrong.
c) The promotion of ethnocentric perspectives on morality.
a) The rejection of cultural diversity in moral discussions.
Name: Score:
Course/Year/Section: Date:
Directions: Connecting theory to practice. Present one (1) real-life example from tourism
industry ethics cases or news stories that illustrate the application of Beauchamp and
Childress's Four Principles.
Name: Score:
Course/Year/Section: Date:
Name: Score:
Course/Year/Section: Date:
Directions: Read the following statements carefully. Identify what is being described in the
statement and write your answers in the space provided before the number.
1. What is one of the strengths of Filipino moral character mentioned in the text?
a) Lack of discipline
b) Crab mentality
c) Strong family values
d) Corruption
3. Which term describes the tendency to pull others down or feel resentful when someone
is progressing or achieving success, as mentioned in the weaknesses of Filipino moral
character?
a) Resilience
b) Crab mentality
c) Generosity
d) Hard work
Name: Score:
Course/Year/Section: Date:
Directions: List Five (5) Filipino Moral Character Strengths and Weaknesses. Explain why it
became a strength and weakness.
STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES
Name: Score:
Course/Year/Section: Date:
Directions: Answer the questions concisely.
Name: Score:
Course/Year/Section: Date:
Plot the stages of your life according to the six stages of moral development of Lawrence
Kohlberg’. Identify where you are now in your moral development.
Name: Score:
Course/Year/Section: Date:
Directions: Read the text below and answer the following questions.
PUERTO PRINCESA, Palawan – This province was the latest jurisdiction in the country to declare Filipino “drag queen”
Pura Luka Vega persona non grata. Vega’s claim to infamy came as a result of a stage performance in which he rapped the
"Ama Namin" (Our Father) prayer and impersonated the Black Nazarene, which many devout Catholics found disturbing.
The declaration, outlined in the resolution submitted by Board Member Winston Arzaga and co-authored by all members
of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan, was unanimously approved on its first and final reading Tuesday morning.
Arzaga said the drag queen's July performance turned a sacred Christian prayer into a disgraceful mockery, completely
ignoring the religious sensitivities, beliefs, and faith held by the extensive Catholic and Christian community in Palawan. "
“What she did was like a sacrilege. She turned a sacred prayer into a form of entertainment. Prayer should be conducted
within the confines of a church," Arzaga said. "If she (Vega) had done it in a temple, it might have been more acceptable,
but she chose to do it in a bar. That's why it became highly deplorable—because she transformed a prayer that should be
revered within the walls of a church into a parody," he added. Arzaga described what Vega did as deeply offensive, as he
converted a prayer meant to be honored within the sanctity of a church into a mockery.
The province of Palawan has recently wrapped up its year-long commemoration of 400 years of Christianity. This
significant event underscores the unwavering commitment of Palaweños to their Christian beliefs. Arzaga asserted that
the offensive behavior exhibited by the drag queen stands in direct opposition to the fundamental principles of showing
respect and remaining devoted to the teachings of the church. Vega supposedly does not identify with any gender label,
calling himself "non-binary" or "gender apathetic," and prefers the pronouns "they/them." The drag queen has been
declared persona non grata in 14 provinces and the capital city of Manila. (PNA)
https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1208783
1. How well do you feel after reading the news clip? Do you feel upset, angry, sad or
indifferent?
Name: Score:
Course/Year/Section: Date:
Directions: Read the given articles by following the links (URL).
After reading the articles, let us find out how well you comprehend the lesson. State the most
important facts you derived from those materials and list down at least 10 Definitions of Terms.
Name: Score:
Course/Year/Section: Date:
1. Share a real-life scenario where you had to apply reasoning and provide details on how
you approached it.
2. Recall an instance where you had to be impartial in a decision or situation. Explain the
context and how you maintained impartiality.
3. Now, reflect on the distinctions between impartiality and reasoning. Can you provide an
example that highlights the fundamental differences between these two concepts?
Name: Score:
Course/Year/Section: Date:
Directions: Rank your level of happiness in each given situation from 1-11. The highest
happiness rate is 1 and 11 is the lowest. Write your answer in the column before the given
situation.
What is the highest reason that makes you happy? And what is the lowest reason that makes
you happy? Provide a short explanation. (10 points)
Name: Score:
Course/Year/Section: Date:
Directions. Read the following statements carefully. Identify what is being described in the
statement and write your answers in the space provided before the number.
a) What is the main argument made by Richard Kinnier, Jerry Kernes, and Therese
Dauterive in their article "A Short List of Universal Values"?
c) What is the relationship between an individual's moral character and their actions,
according to the text?
a) Pre-conventional Morality
b) Conventional Morality
c) Post-conventional Morality
d) Universal Principles
e) How does the relationship between actions and moral character work, as described in
the text?
Name: Score:
Course/Year/Section: Date:
Directions: Let's dive into Aristotle's virtues with a more engaging question:
"Imagine you're exploring Aristotle's philosophy on virtue. Share your understanding of 1-3
basic moral virtues he discusses, and provide a short quote or passage from his works to back
up your insights. Additionally, delve into his concept of the two kinds of virtues (4-5) and
explain how they contribute to his overall philosophy on ethics."
Name: Score:
Course/Year/Section: Date:
Direction: Explore Aristotle's wisdom with this thought-provoking question.
"Aristotle once said, 'For all things that have a function or activity, the good and the well is
thought to reside in the function.' Can you unpack the significance of this quote and its
implications for Aristotle's ethical philosophy?"
Name: Score:
Course/Year/Section: Date:
Instructions:
1. Group into six (6), who will serve as
your teammates for this challenge.
2. Create four large posters, each
dedicated to one of the four types of
laws:
a. Eternal Law
b. Divine Law
c. Human Law
d. Natural Law
3. On each poster, provide a brief
description of the law type, along with
a few keywords or phrases that
characterize it.
4. Provide a set of example scenarios or
cases that relate to each type of law.
These should be printed on separate
cards or sheets of paper.
5. Paste the pictures of this activity.
Natural Law Theory: Crash Course Philosophy #34, from this video reference:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_UfYY7aWKo
After watching the video, let us find out how well you comprehend the lesson. State the most
important facts you derived from the video.
Name: Score:
Course/Year/Section: Date:
What is the difference between Moral Rights and Legal Rights? Site an example.
Name: Score:
Course/Year/Section: Date:
Directions: Present concrete examples related to each field:
• Law: Discuss a legal case where Utilitarian principles influenced the decision-making
process.
• Politics: Explore a political policy or decision shaped by Utilitarian thinking.
• Economics: Analyze a business strategy or economic policy driven by Utilitarian
considerations.