Live in Relationship: Judicial Pronouncements

live in relationship: judicial pronouncements
Brief introduction of live in relationship:

The expression ‘live-in-relationship’ in its ordinary sense to mean that two people living together without intending to
establish any kind of permanent relationship between them. This kind of relationship has emerged primarily out of
convenience. Partners in such kind of relationship initially lack the commitment with each other. The main element that
works in such relationship is ‘compatibility’ between such partners. Due to modernization and city culture, we are
observing this kind relationship in few parts of Indian society. Different kind of persons may be involved in such relations.
Unmarried man and unmarried woman or married man and unmarried woman or unmarried man and married woman
or persons of same sex may live together. The main issues that concern every one who is interested in the progress of the
society are namely, a) whether the Indian society is prepared to accept such new kind of relationship? b) What are the
repercussions of accepting or rejecting of such relations on the continuity and progress of the Indian society? c) Should
the new law be made in India to regulate such kind of relationship? d) What are the consequences of legalization of such
relationship on married partners? Should the existing laws relating maintenance, guardianship, succession and
inheritance be amended to accommodate such relationship? e) What is the role of Indian judiciary in the sphere of
emerging of such relationships? The trend of Indian judiciary is so far not consistent with regard to recognition of such
relationships. But in so far as the protection of the claims of women in such relations is concerned, the Indian judiciary is
firm in its stand to render justice to the vulnerable section of the society.
The concept of Live-in-relationship

Live- in-relationships are not new for western countries. Some tried to define live-in-relationship by observing that it is
an arrangement of living under which the couples who are unmarried live together to conduct a long-going relationship
similarly as in marriage
The main idea, according to some, of cohabiting or conducting a live-in-relationship is that the interested couple wanted
to test their compatibility for each other before going for some commitment. Live-in-relationship is a de facto union in
which couple shares common bed-room without solemnizing marriage. It is non-marital relationship prevailing in West
with the different name like, common law marriages, informal marriages or marriage by habit, deemed marriages etc. It
is a form of interpersonal status which is legally recognized in some jurisdictions as a marriage even though no legally
recognized marriage ceremony is performed or civil marriage contract is entered into or the marriage registered in a civil
registry.
Some bold couples believe that going for a wedding is just a waste of money, because they think their love doesn’t need
any paper certification or social drama. According to Osho, in their true nature of all human beings are polygamy,
marriage makes them monogamy which is against its nature. So that’s the reason after marriage too people keep relation
outside wedlock.We can infer from analyzing the relationships that it is evident that live-in couples are still largely from
professions like entertainment, advertising, modeling and media. According to Samindara Sawant, clinical
psychologist,Disha Counselling Clinic, Mumbai has found that the trend of live-in-relationships has not really caught on in
India, especially in the middle and upper middle classes, where marriage is still very much the norm. Live-in-relationships
are practiced mostly in the metropolitan cities. Such practice is still a social taboo in a major part of our country which is
constituted by villages and towns. According to a view the live-in-relationships are earlier in existence in the form of
‘maitraya karars’ which has been practiced in some parts of Gujarat. There is a gradual transition from the sacrament of
arranged marriages to love marriages and ultimately to live-in relationships, due to many reasons like lack of tolerance
and commitment.
Law and Live-in-Relationships

There is no statute directly dealing with live-in-relationship in India. The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, confers the legitimacy
on child born out of ‘void’ and ‘voidable’ marriages and establishes their succession and property rights. The void
marriage is not a marriage in the eye of law. The moot question is whether the relation existing in void and voidable
marriage is equated with live-in-relationship as understood in its popular sense. The Protection of Women from
Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (PWFDVA) also provides some kind of protection to the aggrieved parties from any kind of
atrocities faced by the females living in ‘relationship in the nature of marriage.’ This Act has been widely hailed as the
first legal Act to recognize the existence of non-marital adult heterosexual relations. This Act defines an “aggrieved
person” who will be covered under this Act as “any woman who is, or has been, in a domestic relationship with the
respondent and who alleges to have been subjected to any act of domestic violence by the respondent.” Further the Act
defines a‘domestic relationship’ as ‘a relationship between two persons who live or have, at any point of time, lived
together in a shared household, when they are related by consanguinity, marriage, or through a relationship in the
nature of marriage, adoption or are family members living together as a joint family.’ In having used the idea of “relations
in the nature of marriage”, the Act seems to have widened the scope of legally recognised domestic relationships
between men and women. In a commentary on one case arising out of the Act, the report Staying Alive 2009 (Lawyers
Collective and ICRW 2009) suggests that whilst this provision has invited much criticism and controversy, it is important
to note that it does not make an invalid marriage valid or provide legal recognition to bigamous marriages… This
provision merely seeks to denounce domestic violence in any quarter. It is not a judgment call on the morality of the
choice to cohabit outside of marriage. It can therefore be argued that it would be mistaken to see the Act as conferring
some sort of a legal status upon nonmarital relations. What it undoubtedly does is to acknowledge the existence of such
relationships and the right of women in such relations to protection from violence. Justice Mallimath Committee as well
as the Law Commission of India states that if a woman has been in a live-in-relationship for a reasonable period, she
should enjoy the legal rights of the wife. The Committee also recommended the amendment of the definition of ‘wife’
under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C) so that a woman in live-in-relationship can get the status of a
wife. But there is a lack of consistency in the recommendations of the Committee.
. If all the recommendations of the committee were implemented, a woman can simultaneously seek maintenance under
Section 125 of the Cr.P.C and be charged with adultery under Section 497 of the IPC. A man on the other hand may be
susceptible to charges of adultery and bigamy at the same time as he pays maintenance to the woman with whom he is
in a bigamous/adulterous relation!
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Rules, 2006:

The rules made under the Domestic Violence Act provide for the procedure for the application for protection orders,
residence orders, and monetary reliefs by women in live-in relationships.
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence (Amendment) Act, 2013:

This amendment to the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, includes "relationship in the nature of marriage" within the
definition of "domestic relationship." This includes live-in relationships, and women in such relationships are entitled to
protection under the Act
Indian Penal Code:

The Indian Penal Code provides for criminal liability for offences like rape, adultery, and bigamy, which can also be
applicable in cases of live-in relationships Overall, while there is no specific law for live-in relationships in India, the
Indian legal system has provided certain legal protection and entitlement to rights to couples in such relationships
through various judgments and provisions
Landmark Judgement For Live-in Relationship

There have been several landmark judgments in India related to live-in relationships, which have played a significant role
in providing legal recognition and protection to such relationships. Some of the most important judgments are:
D. Velusamy v. D. Patchaiammal (2010):[i]

In this case, the Supreme Court of India laid down certain criteria to determine whether a relationship between two
adults, who are not married, qualifies as a "relationship in the nature of marriage" and is within the ambit of domestic
relationship under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005
S. Khushboo v. Kanniammal & Anr. (2010):[ii]

In this case, the Supreme Court held that live-in relationships are not illegal or immoral, and that adults have the right to
live together even if they are not married.
Indra Sarma v. V.K.V. Sarma (2013):[iii]

In this case, the Supreme Court held that a woman in a live-in relationship is entitled to protection under the Domestic
Violence Act, 2005, and is entitled to maintenance if the man deserts her or refuses to maintain her
Payal Sharma v. N. Talwar (2018):[iv]

In this case, the Delhi High Court held that a woman in a live-in relationship is entitled to the same rights as a legally
wedded wife under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and that a child born out of such a relationship is entitled to
maintenance under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956
Lalita Toppo v. State of Jharkhand (2018):[v]

In this case, the Supreme Court held that a couple in a live-in relationship can be deemed to be married if they have lived
together for a long time and have been accepted by society as a married couple
These landmark judgments have played a significant role in providing legal recognition and protection to live-in
relationships in India and have helped to address the social stigma and discrimination faced by couples in such
relationships.
Conclusion
live-in relationships have become more prevalent in India in recent years, and the legal framework for such relationships
is evolving. While there is no specific law in India that governs live-in relationships, the courts have recognized the
validity of such relationships and have provided legal protection to individuals in such relationships through various
judgments.
The courts have held that live-in relationships are not illegal or immoral, and adults have the right to live together even if
they are not married. The courts have also held that women in live-in relationships are entitled to the same rights as
legally married wives, including protection under the Domestic Violence Act and maintenance.
However, there are still many legal and social challenges faced by couples in live-in relationships in India, including
property rights, custody of children, and social stigma. It is important for the government and society to recognize and
accept live-in relationships as a legitimate form of companionship and provide more legal protection to individuals in
such relationships.
Overall, the legal framework for live-in relationships in India is still evolving, and there is a need for more comprehensive
laws and policies to address the various issues and challenges faced by couples in such relationships
Present by : Name: patel Adarsh
Reg no:221FU01019
Course: BA LLB (Hons)

Live in Relationship: Judicial Pronouncements

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Live in Relationship: Judicial Pronouncements

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Live in Relationship: Judicial Pronouncements

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

live in relationship: judicial pronouncements

Brief introduction of live in relationship:

The concept of Live-in-relationship

Law and Live-in-Relationships

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Rules, 2006:

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence (Amendment) Act, 2013:

Indian Penal Code:

Landmark Judgement For Live-in Relationship

D. Velusamy v. D. Patchaiammal (2010):[i]

S. Khushboo v. Kanniammal & Anr. (2010):[ii]

Indra Sarma v. V.K.V. Sarma (2013):[iii]

Payal Sharma v. N. Talwar (2018):[iv]

Lalita Toppo v. State of Jharkhand (2018):[v]

Present by : Name: patel Adarsh

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.